FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > What are your geeky interests?
What are your geeky interests?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Space and Physics. Geeky but obsessive. Brian Cox is our hero! " I've met Brian Cox. When I was at uni in Lancaster. He came over and gave a talk. I was on campus and in accommodation at the time. And saw him. Nice guy, very approachable. Talked to everyone and anyone. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Space and Physics. Geeky but obsessive. Brian Cox is our hero! I've met Brian Cox. When I was at uni in Lancaster. He came over and gave a talk. I was on campus and in accommodation at the time. And saw him. Nice guy, very approachable. Talked to everyone and anyone. " Took my kids to see him last year on his arena tour. Their enthusiasm didn't match mine 😂 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Space and Physics. Geeky but obsessive. Brian Cox is our hero! I've met Brian Cox. When I was at uni in Lancaster. He came over and gave a talk. I was on campus and in accommodation at the time. And saw him. Nice guy, very approachable. Talked to everyone and anyone. Took my kids to see him last year on his arena tour. Their enthusiasm didn't match mine 😂" Hahahah did you get an autograph at least?? 😂 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Space and Physics. Geeky but obsessive. Brian Cox is our hero! " Same here. Actually studied astrophysics at uni. Also an unashamedly big trekkie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Witchcraft and history of witch trials, divination (tarot/pendulum etc), space, gaming and probably so much more "Wow witchcraft and witch trials. That sounds interesting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Witchcraft and history of witch trials, divination (tarot/pendulum etc), space, gaming and probably so much more
Wow witchcraft and witch trials. That sounds interesting "Honestly, it's been an incredible thing to learn about. Turns out that witchcraft is very much a real thing! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I craft. I do a lot of handmade book folding. I made a personalized gift set recently " Hey that is amazing. Good on you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have a few geeky interests. I'm a big geek for Ancient History. So much so have a collection of ancient items, like Roman coins, and Ancient Egyptian Shabti's (figurines they used at funerals) and many others. That is just one example of my geeky interests. " Snap! Except instead of Shabti's mine is marble busts and figurines of Gods etc Shame you're a dude! 😂 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have a few geeky interests. I'm a big geek for Ancient History. So much so have a collection of ancient items, like Roman coins, and Ancient Egyptian Shabti's (figurines they used at funerals) and many others. That is just one example of my geeky interests. Snap! Except instead of Shabti's mine is marble busts and figurines of Gods etc Shame you're a dude! 😂" I do apologise for being a guy 😂😂 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Books, collecting, reading and binding. Mrs " Any type of books or? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m too old and the wrong sex to have a PlayStation (currently playing God of War Ragnarok). I am intrigued by quantum theory and the multiverse." Hey nowt wrong with that. Never too old or wrong gender to play online games | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For me- cars and motorbikes Love driving and riding, but the more geeky aspect is I can spend hours hours polishing and cleaning my collection with various potions, lotions and kit. Hubby- gaming. Has about 20 different consoles, all of which he uses regularly. " Your hubby is a legend because that is my other geeky interest. I'm a massive gamer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Don't really have one, but i have slept with a really geeky person. Does that count? "I'd like to sleep with a geeky person 😈😁 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Don't really have one, but i have slept with a really geeky person. Does that count? "I will allow this 😂 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Medieval history - not so much the who, what, where and when. More the how's and why's of everyday life in the 14th & 15th centuries (plus Dave's fascination with close quarter weapons of the period)" Qh that is interesting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I've been getting really into TTRPG Actual Plays " Now I'm curious. What is that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Collecting 50p coins the ones with different designs on , got about 50 so far, and if they aren’t worth anything I’ve got £25 saved up lol" I started doing that... only have 5 🤣🤣 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Uncovering the potential connections between lots of rather strange and niche concepts that currently appear, to most, as entirely unrelated." Conspiracy theorist then?! 🤔 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Space and Physics. Geeky but obsessive. Brian Cox is our hero! " ...this is my answer too. although I will unashamedly admit, I have no clue! I love to listen to podcasts and read about quantum physics, space/time, relativity and all that; but cannot get my head round any bit of it. Which ironically, is why I love it so much; blows my mind! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Space and Physics. Geeky but obsessive. Brian Cox is our hero! ...this is my answer too. although I will unashamedly admit, I have no clue! I love to listen to podcasts and read about quantum physics, space/time, relativity and all that; but cannot get my head round any bit of it. Which ironically, is why I love it so much; blows my mind! " Yeah I can't understand majority of it either. It is fascinating but complicated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I've been getting really into TTRPG Actual Plays Now I'm curious. What is that?" Table Top RPG, DnD and the like and actual plays are watching performers, preform, an improvised story I guess | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Railway heritage,vehicles,steam engines, gardening, woodworking.Have seven vehicles,around fourteen mowers,and six bicycles." love this  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Space and Physics. Geeky but obsessive. Brian Cox is our hero! ...this is my answer too. although I will unashamedly admit, I have no clue! I love to listen to podcasts and read about quantum physics, space/time, relativity and all that; but cannot get my head round any bit of it. Which ironically, is why I love it so much; blows my mind! " This is me too! I'd have put it in my answer, but couldn't find the words. This sums it up 🙈 ~ Mrs. DS | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? " One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anything science but in particular, Space exploration, applied physics and engineering. Sci-fi and some fantasy. Tabletop gaming. Especially Warhammer, I paint a lot as a way of relaxing " Ooh and also trying to get into DnD… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍." I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!!" You ever watched Lord of the Rings? Where Gandalf would talk about riddles and shit. You wouldn't understand a word but was completely enthralled. Yeah it reminds me of that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!! You ever watched Lord of the Rings? Where Gandalf would talk about riddles and shit. You wouldn't understand a word but was completely enthralled. Yeah it reminds me of that "  Wot u sed 👍 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!! You ever watched Lord of the Rings? Where Gandalf would talk about riddles and shit. You wouldn't understand a word but was completely enthralled. Yeah it reminds me of that Wot u sed 👍"Well I get that, however, but what if we apply the law of parsimony. Also what 50% camp are you in that we live in a simulation? For or against? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!! You ever watched Lord of the Rings? Where Gandalf would talk about riddles and shit. You wouldn't understand a word but was completely enthralled. Yeah it reminds me of that Wot u sed 👍
Well I get that, however, but what if we apply the law of parsimony.
Also what 50% camp are you in that we live in a simulation? For or against?"Simulation doesn't answer anything. Who or what made the simulators? Still goes back to a something/nothing debate. There's something not quite right about "number" - something/nothing as reliable concepts. Which our current brain morphology/thinking modes can't quite get. But, just because we've evolved to point "D" currently with how we think, doesn't mean point "D" is the final point of thinking modes. Plato's Cave etc. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!! You ever watched Lord of the Rings? Where Gandalf would talk about riddles and shit. You wouldn't understand a word but was completely enthralled. Yeah it reminds me of that " I'm getting Theilard de Chardin vibes Religion of progress, consciousness accelerating towards an omega point of universal complexity. I find the paradox is that we are individual points of consciousness in a universal field of existence. Droplets of sea in the sea, if you will. It's just hard for our human minds to hold the concept that we are the self and other simultaneously. Brahman is Atman. And so we perform a dance, one that creates and destroys to the tune of the universe. Reaching outside of ourselves for the answer that is within. Swinging on the spiral of our divinity. It's full of stars. Why not, what else shall we do but embrace the absurd seeking of meaning that drives us mad, ignites our passions and calms our torrid waters. Let go of letting go of seeking? Any colour you like.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!! You ever watched Lord of the Rings? Where Gandalf would talk about riddles and shit. You wouldn't understand a word but was completely enthralled. Yeah it reminds me of that I'm getting Theilard de Chardin vibes Religion of progress, consciousness accelerating towards an omega point of universal complexity. I find the paradox is that we are individual points of consciousness in a universal field of existence. Droplets of sea in the sea, if you will. It's just hard for our human minds to hold the concept that we are the self and other simultaneously. Brahman is Atman. And so we perform a dance, one that creates and destroys to the tune of the universe. Reaching outside of ourselves for the answer that is within. Swinging on the spiral of our divinity. It's full of stars. Why not, what else shall we do but embrace the absurd seeking of meaning that drives us mad, ignites our passions and calms our torrid waters. Let go of letting go of seeking? Any colour you like. "I think we need to ditch the divinity, and also realise the tyranny of science as similar to the tyranny of religion (in terms of conditioning thought patterns). They're both old languages, and we can go further with newer languages. Ethically in particular. It's my major beef with Sheldrake - he was a key figure with Bohm and Krishnamurti, but he went "and so....god". Sorry Rupert - you went backwards just as you were heading the most forwards. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Football manager " Well yeah of course football manager....what team and year are you in? I'm currently in 2032 with QPR just gone unbeaten in prem and won everything | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!! You ever watched Lord of the Rings? Where Gandalf would talk about riddles and shit. You wouldn't understand a word but was completely enthralled. Yeah it reminds me of that I'm getting Theilard de Chardin vibes Religion of progress, consciousness accelerating towards an omega point of universal complexity. I find the paradox is that we are individual points of consciousness in a universal field of existence. Droplets of sea in the sea, if you will. It's just hard for our human minds to hold the concept that we are the self and other simultaneously. Brahman is Atman. And so we perform a dance, one that creates and destroys to the tune of the universe. Reaching outside of ourselves for the answer that is within. Swinging on the spiral of our divinity. It's full of stars. Why not, what else shall we do but embrace the absurd seeking of meaning that drives us mad, ignites our passions and calms our torrid waters. Let go of letting go of seeking? Any colour you like.
I think we need to ditch the divinity, and also realise the tyranny of science as similar to the tyranny of religion (in terms of conditioning thought patterns).
They're both old languages, and we can go further with newer languages.
Ethically in particular.
It's my major beef with Sheldrake - he was a key figure with Bohm and Krishnamurti, but he went "and so....god".
Sorry Rupert - you went backwards just as you were heading the most forwards."Oh I agree, in essence, what ever colour you like. Our explanations will always fall foul, as it is in the seeking in itself that we find meaning. In that sense any definitive answer is tyrannical. And the newer languages will become so too. Philosophical suicide as Camus put it. Some theories simply resonate for me and that's enough for me. I'm not looking for an answer, I just enjoy my curious enquiry. I like Sheldrake's work and morphic resonance theory, but yes he brought that into the lens of his religious faith, I agree. I'm a let's not throw the baby out with the bath water kinda person though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!! You ever watched Lord of the Rings? Where Gandalf would talk about riddles and shit. You wouldn't understand a word but was completely enthralled. Yeah it reminds me of that I'm getting Theilard de Chardin vibes Religion of progress, consciousness accelerating towards an omega point of universal complexity. I find the paradox is that we are individual points of consciousness in a universal field of existence. Droplets of sea in the sea, if you will. It's just hard for our human minds to hold the concept that we are the self and other simultaneously. Brahman is Atman. And so we perform a dance, one that creates and destroys to the tune of the universe. Reaching outside of ourselves for the answer that is within. Swinging on the spiral of our divinity. It's full of stars. Why not, what else shall we do but embrace the absurd seeking of meaning that drives us mad, ignites our passions and calms our torrid waters. Let go of letting go of seeking? Any colour you like.
I think we need to ditch the divinity, and also realise the tyranny of science as similar to the tyranny of religion (in terms of conditioning thought patterns).
They're both old languages, and we can go further with newer languages.
Ethically in particular.
It's my major beef with Sheldrake - he was a key figure with Bohm and Krishnamurti, but he went "and so....god".
Sorry Rupert - you went backwards just as you were heading the most forwards.
Oh I agree, in essence, what ever colour you like. Our explanations will always fall foul, as it is in the seeking in itself that we find meaning. In that sense any definitive answer is tyrannical. And the newer languages will become so too. Philosophical suicide as Camus put it.
Some theories simply resonate for me and that's enough for me. I'm not looking for an answer, I just enjoy my curious enquiry. I like Sheldrake's work and morphic resonance theory, but yes he brought that into the lens of his religious faith, I agree. I'm a let's not throw the baby out with the bath water kinda person though.
"
You're a poet.
I'm a politician.
We're both necessary. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And "Law of Parsimony" - I'm never a fan of "laws" because they suggest an end-point of reality has been reached. But I certainly think reality will favour simplicity, which goes with the idea behind that law. However, the simplest idea to me is that the entire universe is unfolded in every thing. Full data connectivity. My finger = the uni/multiverse. So is that bit of carpet, or that chicken. I think that's the simplest answer I've yet seen. Bohm's version of Holography (Implicate and Explicate Orders). But - it's also one we don't have the tools to deal with (yet). And it (quite rightly) feels thoroughly bonkers. " Also - Lapin - you mentioned that physics/multiverse has helped with mental health. I think that's very true because at a really, really deep level our minds are connected to all of reality (every bit - that's actually a large part of the Bohm/Holography/Implicate Order thing. Bohm is virtually unheard of, but Einstein wanted him as his "successor" because Bohm was uniting Relativity/Quantum better than most. Bohm then got in a lot of trouble during the US McCarthy "Red Under The Bed" witch-hunts, and was driven into near-obscurity via the political public relations efforts against him). Anyway - of course our mental health will suffer. If, at a material reality and intuitive level, we "know" things are deeper to how culture and current science allow us to think, it sets up a "mental tension". We're being told reality is "X", but reality is "A+F+X+++++????". It's a little similar to how some Native American/Siberian-y "philosophies" see everything as moving in the same planes. You are the bear, whilst not being the bear too. But you and the bear are part of the same story and reality. You can't be separated. Our culture says "No" to this. That forces a schism between what our minds "feel" to be truer, and what we're allowed to think/feel. So yup - I missed your MH point, which was callous of me. But MH benefits from a more holistic integration to our world, rather than the fragmentation, particulation, and individualism that have defined European thought, culture, class, and economics very noticeably since around 1500. Fragmentation (measuring) suggests things are fragmented AT THEIR VERY ROOT LEVEL. Mental health, modern physics, economic crises, and cutting edge-philosophies globally aren't comfortable with the fragment any more. It rescued us from the stupidity of religious dogma, but we now need to rescue ourselves from the warfares and competitions it set up in turn. It also leads to MORE innovation, MORE wealth, and MORE abundance for humans and the rest of the planet...galaxy...and so on. Fragmentation has had its day. A necessary 500 years to move us on, and now a millstone around our necks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Trains. I love trains. Have been in Manchester and Berlin in the last month and the highlight of both trips was how good the train network is. " I get that. Visiting Amsterdam I realised how rubbish the trains and buses in Glasgow actually are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"True Crime…" Modern or historical | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"True Crime… Modern or historical " Modern for me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maps Fonts/Graphic Design History Sci-Fi/Star Trek. Used to read more than I do now and covered a fair bit over the years. Usually nonfiction and covering history and politics. I do new to look again at open university and whether it’s doable " Fellow Trekkie here! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"True Crime… Modern or historical Modern for me. " You know about Brix max robbery??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"True Crime… Modern or historical Modern for me. You know about Brix max robbery???" Just googled it! Sounds like I need to search for a podcast about it!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"True Crime… Modern or historical Modern for me. You know about Brix max robbery??? Just googled it! Sounds like I need to search for a podcast about it!!" Get the who killed Daniel Morgan one It’s amazing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"History - especially anything Tudor or Plantagenet. Gaming. Languages - I’m learning Japanese at the moment. L" Good luck with learning Japanese 👍 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"History - especially anything Tudor or Plantagenet. Gaming. Languages - I’m learning Japanese at the moment. OP...thank you for this thread, possibly my favourite, ever! Good luck with learning Japanese 👍 " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Also thanks to klunge and hadsof and any others adding to the physics chat.....much appreciated. " You're very welcome Lapin 🤝. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Deep space stuff, nebulae all that 🌌 "Milankovich cycles 🥶and deep forest theories 👽🛸👾 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Writing spreadsheets and coding macros - they can be like puzzles, I just love how they make me think outside of the box. " are you an accountant? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Deep space stuff, nebulae all that 🌌
Milankovich cycles 🥶and deep forest theories 👽🛸👾"👍👍👍 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Writing spreadsheets and coding macros - they can be like puzzles, I just love how they make me think outside of the box. are you an accountant?" Nope, I don't really need them to be as technical as they are but I enjoy designing and developing them and they save people that use them a lot of time in the long run. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like there are a lot more physics geeks than I thought there would be..... I love the idea of the multiverse, the idea alone had helped with coping with MH. Self taught here....am I wrong in believing, that the only way of reaching a multiverse is by travelling faster than the speed of light, or if we can find a worm hole that bends space / time and has an exit from our universe to another? One of the things about speed is it requires a point A, and a point B, in order to be measured. The word measure comes from the Proto-Indo-European "matra". As the cultures drifted, those that went West (Europeans) believed "measure" was a mark of the real. Those that went East, believed something wasn't quite right with "matra" as measure/real. Matra gave birth to "maya" - illusion. So the same root-word has given birth to very different philosophical worldviews. One that says "measure" is real (time, space, atoms). One that says "it's all a bit of an illusion". Our "Western" physics is now enmeshed in things such as holography, quantum, and even fractals. All of which aren't fully comfortable with old notions of measure. As a result, speed (requiring time and distance) aren't as reliable as once thought. Which feeds a bit more into the "no matter how much stuff you have, and whatever speed it appears to have, how did the stuff ever arrive from non-stuff?" Ie - how and where did "stuff" originate? And where or how did the stuff that stuff originated from, itself originate. Our minds can just about cope with the idea that there's possibly no fundamental stuff or time - the beginning IS the end, the stuff IS the non-stuff. We can just about cope with paradox, even if we can't conceptualise how it works. So I think the next batch of answers, so far beyond Einstein, probably involve a consciousness change whereby linearity is replaced by a paradoxical holism. Blake's "Infinity in every thing". Holography is heading there. So are fractals, in a different way. So I don't think speed of light or wormholes are the main issue. I think our conceptual apparatus (the way we condition ourselves to think) is. And it's only the next stage we'll be uncovering once we "think" differently. Evolution's not done with us yet - it may never be done, until the last "thought" becomes the motive force for the continuation of a timeless, dimensionless, "stuff-less but stuff-full" ongoing paradox. Poetry that ❤️🚀👍. I couldn't keep up with a single word of that! ...and I fucking love it!! You ever watched Lord of the Rings? Where Gandalf would talk about riddles and shit. You wouldn't understand a word but was completely enthralled. Yeah it reminds me of that I'm getting Theilard de Chardin vibes Religion of progress, consciousness accelerating towards an omega point of universal complexity. I find the paradox is that we are individual points of consciousness in a universal field of existence. Droplets of sea in the sea, if you will. It's just hard for our human minds to hold the concept that we are the self and other simultaneously. Brahman is Atman. And so we perform a dance, one that creates and destroys to the tune of the universe. Reaching outside of ourselves for the answer that is within. Swinging on the spiral of our divinity. It's full of stars. Why not, what else shall we do but embrace the absurd seeking of meaning that drives us mad, ignites our passions and calms our torrid waters. Let go of letting go of seeking? Any colour you like.
I think we need to ditch the divinity, and also realise the tyranny of science as similar to the tyranny of religion (in terms of conditioning thought patterns).
They're both old languages, and we can go further with newer languages.
Ethically in particular.
It's my major beef with Sheldrake - he was a key figure with Bohm and Krishnamurti, but he went "and so....god".
Sorry Rupert - you went backwards just as you were heading the most forwards.
Oh I agree, in essence, what ever colour you like. Our explanations will always fall foul, as it is in the seeking in itself that we find meaning. In that sense any definitive answer is tyrannical. And the newer languages will become so too. Philosophical suicide as Camus put it.
Some theories simply resonate for me and that's enough for me. I'm not looking for an answer, I just enjoy my curious enquiry. I like Sheldrake's work and morphic resonance theory, but yes he brought that into the lens of his religious faith, I agree. I'm a let's not throw the baby out with the bath water kinda person though.
You're a poet.
I'm a politician.
We're both necessary."I want to continue the conversation, but I am making efforts to be conscientious and I don't want to add an extra flick of the thumb scroll for other fabberfolk, whom are not interested. I empathise with the suffering that causes others. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like doing hot geeks" 🙋♂️ I volunteer as tribute. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like doing hot geeks 🙋♂️ I volunteer as tribute."  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I want to continue the conversation, but I am making efforts to be conscientious and I don't want to add an extra flick of the thumb scroll for other fabberfolk, whom are not interested. I empathise with the suffering that causes others." How about this rather excellent thread fills, and then you start one off on the more specific things still burning away inside? We could do private message, but I think there might be one or two others who'd potentially enjoy joining in? And if not, we just realise real quick that there's geek, and then there's "eek-that-geek" . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x" Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Also OP - You've crafted an incredible post here. I don’t think I've ever seen a post that has more of the Spirit of Christmas in it (humans actually communicating about really important things to them, and enjoying each other) - mainly because it never set out to connect people, but it just has. It's got soul, depth, and it's all been possible because we're all geeks with concealed depths. Kinda like Stars In Their Eyes, Geek Perv Version. Thank you 💜💙." You are very welcome. I'm happy to help 😊 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"gaming all day" What sorta games do you enjoy? ☺️ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I love looking at churches and cathedrals too, love the architecture of them x" Absolutely! I like going through town centres and seeing the mix of styles, my favourite being Art Deco. Mixing Sci Fi and architecture btw; there's a gargoyle on top of Paisley Abbey that's been modeled on a chestburster from Alien. It got remodelled years ago and a stone mason slipped one in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"gaming all day" PC? Xbox? PS? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun " Agreed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun Agreed " But what if I'm not really a geek geek? ... I just like stuff | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun Agreed But what if I'm not really a geek geek? ... I just like stuff " Depends if the stuff is Cool or not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun Agreed But what if I'm not really a geek geek? ... I just like stuff Depends if the stuff is Cool or not " Church and cathedral architecture?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Space and Physics. Geeky but obsessive. Brian Cox is our hero! " Totally agree here... I every blu disc he's released and watch them regularly. Fascinating and informative. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun Agreed But what if I'm not really a geek geek? ... I just like stuff Depends if the stuff is Cool or not Church and cathedral architecture??" Not cool | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun Agreed But what if I'm not really a geek geek? ... I just like stuff Depends if the stuff is Cool or not Church and cathedral architecture?? Not cool " Oh well. . I've never been cool anyway 🤣🤣 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun Agreed But what if I'm not really a geek geek? ... I just like stuff Depends if the stuff is Cool or not Church and cathedral architecture??" Definitely cool. If we ever go on hols in the UK we often go to the nearest big church or cathedral. I work in the Shard occasionally and often to to Southwark cathedral. Often see a little detail I've not seen before. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun Agreed But what if I'm not really a geek geek? ... I just like stuff Depends if the stuff is Cool or not Church and cathedral architecture?? Not cool Oh well. . I've never been cool anyway 🤣🤣" Well the fack that your discussing having a fan 3 sum with me seem cool to me lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm loving seeing what other people enjoy x Yes it’s great seeing who is a geek. Nothing better than a geek who likes to meet and discuss geek stuff whilst having fun Agreed But what if I'm not really a geek geek? ... I just like stuff Depends if the stuff is Cool or not Church and cathedral architecture?? Definitely cool. If we ever go on hols in the UK we often go to the nearest big church or cathedral. I work in the Shard occasionally and often to to Southwark cathedral. Often see a little detail I've not seen before. " Awesome x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Now I'm a massive buffy and angel fan x" These are brilliant. Team Spike all the way . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Now I'm a massive buffy and angel fan x These are brilliant. Team Spike all the way ." I really loved how they developed his character, and how the developed Cordelias character in Angel x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Now I'm a massive buffy and angel fan x These are brilliant. Team Spike all the way . I really loved how they developed his character, and how the developed Cordelias character in Angel x" They really did them justice. Might need to get them out and rewatch them soon | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Now I'm a massive buffy and angel fan x These are brilliant. Team Spike all the way . I really loved how they developed his character, and how the developed Cordelias character in Angel x They really did them justice. Might need to get them out and rewatch them soon" Same xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Now I'm a massive buffy and angel fan x These are brilliant. Team Spike all the way . I really loved how they developed his character, and how the developed Cordelias character in Angel x They really did them justice. Might need to get them out and rewatch them soon Same xx" Not going to lie, how they left both seasons, done me in. I know they continued through with the comics but it's not the same. And Sarah Michelle Gellar throughout .. oohhh boy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Now I'm a massive buffy and angel fan x These are brilliant. Team Spike all the way . I really loved how they developed his character, and how the developed Cordelias character in Angel x They really did them justice. Might need to get them out and rewatch them soon Same xx Not going to lie, how they left both seasons, done me in. I know they continued through with the comics but it's not the same. And Sarah Michelle Gellar throughout .. oohhh boy" Oh same ! Ooh see I think willow was hotter especially dark willow | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Now I'm a massive buffy and angel fan x These are brilliant. Team Spike all the way . I really loved how they developed his character, and how the developed Cordelias character in Angel x They really did them justice. Might need to get them out and rewatch them soon Same xx Not going to lie, how they left both seasons, done me in. I know they continued through with the comics but it's not the same. And Sarah Michelle Gellar throughout .. oohhh boy Oh same ! Ooh see I think willow was hotter especially dark willow "Agreed.. she was underrated, weren't until I got a bit older I started to properly appreciate. But if we're talking bad girl.. faith was sexy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So judging from the comments. Most peoples interests are gaming, history and science related stuff. Have I got that right?" Hey! At least call us fellow geeks .
I think that covers most of it OP - thanks for the thread . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So judging from the comments. Most peoples interests are gaming, history and science related stuff. Have I got that right? Hey! At least call us fellow geeks .
I think that covers most of it OP - thanks for the thread ."I misread that as Greeks then. Have I been watching too many ancient Greek stuff. Maybe 😂 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Now I'm a massive buffy and angel fan x These are brilliant. Team Spike all the way . I really loved how they developed his character, and how the developed Cordelias character in Angel x They really did them justice. Might need to get them out and rewatch them soon Same xx Not going to lie, how they left both seasons, done me in. I know they continued through with the comics but it's not the same. And Sarah Michelle Gellar throughout .. oohhh boy Oh same ! Ooh see I think willow was hotter especially dark willow
Agreed.. she was underrated, weren't until I got a bit older I started to properly appreciate. But if we're talking bad girl.. faith was sexy"Oh yes . Faith 🥰😍🥵🥵 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
