FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > It's no longer just a flu is it?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. " I wish I could work from home, but so long as you are okay then that's fine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. I wish I could work from home, but so long as you are okay then that's fine." I don't take the attitude that as long as I am OK it is fine. I would avoid contact with people just in case. That's the opposite of what I'm saying. I can't help that I do a job where I can work remotely. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. I wish I could work from home, but so long as you are okay then that's fine." Don’t think that’s what he was saying at all! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. I wish I could work from home, but so long as you are okay then that's fine. I don't take the attitude that as long as I am OK it is fine. I would avoid contact with people just in case. That's the opposite of what I'm saying. I can't help that I do a job where I can work remotely. " Why ever not? I would | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. " I know. But a lot of people were saying we need to stop being snowflakes. Now I think that argument has been comprehensively proven wrong and most people now accept it is far more serious. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. I know. But a lot of people were saying we need to stop being snowflakes. Now I think that argument has been comprehensively proven wrong and most people now accept it is far more serious. " Do they? I’m not so sure. Time will tell. You usually just get the usual comments of “more people die of ...” what a pointless argument that is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Haha it's quite funny how people are worrying so much have you seen the statistics for deaths in the world any way with out this virus more people die from snake bites every day than have died from this virus in one day and I for one have never seen a snake in the wild if your going to catch it you will and if your gonna die from it you will so no point worying to much." It isn't about the current numbers, it's about the potential. If we take no measures we be dying in the hundreds of thousands maybe millions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Haha it's quite funny how people are worrying so much have you seen the statistics for deaths in the world any way with out this virus more people die from snake bites every day than have died from this virus in one day and I for one have never seen a snake in the wild if your going to catch it you will and if your gonna die from it you will so no point worying to much." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Over 100,000 people die from Coronary heart disease each year in the UK. No doubt the same people who are hoarding toilet paper are having 'extra fries' with their burger as we speak. Unfortunately most people are risk illiterate. Here is what a Canadian infectious disease has written. I'm a doctor and an Infectious Diseases Specialist. I've been at this for more than 20 years seeing sick patients on a daily basis. I have worked in inner city hospitals and in the poorest slums of Africa. HIV-AIDS, Hepatitis,TB, SARS, Measles, Shingles, Whooping cough, Diphtheria...there is little I haven't been exposed to in my profession. And with notable exception of SARS, very little has left me feeling vulnerable, overwhelmed or downright scared. I am not scared of Covid-19. I am concerned about the implications of a novel infectious agent that has spread the world over and continues to find new footholds in different soil. I am rightly concerned for the welfare of those who are elderly, in frail health or disenfranchised who stand to suffer mostly, and disproportionately, at the hands of this new scourge. But I am not scared of Covid-19. What I am scared about is the loss of reason and wave of fear that has induced the masses of society into a spellbinding spiral of panic, stockpiling obscene quantities of anything that could fill a bomb shelter adequately in a post-apocalyptic world. I am scared of the N95 masks that are stolen from hospitals and urgent care clinics where they are actually needed for front line healthcare providers and instead are being donned in airports, malls, and coffee lounges, perpetuating even more fear and suspicion of others. I am scared that our hospitals will be overwhelmed with anyone who thinks they " probably don't have it but may as well get checked out no matter what because you just never know..." and those with heart failure, emphysema, pneumonia and strokes will pay the price for overfilled ER waiting rooms with only so many doctors and nurses to assess. I am scared that travel restrictions will become so far reaching that weddings will be canceled, graduations missed and family reunions will not materialize. And well, even that big party called the Olympic Games...that could be kyboshed too. Can you even imagine? I'm scared those same epidemic fears will limit trade, harm partnerships in multiple sectors, business and otherwise and ultimately culminate in a global recession. But mostly, I'm scared about what message we are telling our kids when faced with a threat. Instead of reason, rationality, openmindedness and altruism, we are telling them to panic, be fearful, suspicious, reactionary and self-interested. Covid-19 is nowhere near over. It will be coming to a city, a hospital, a friend, even a family member near you at some point. Expect it. Stop waiting to be surprised further. The fact is the virus itself will not likely do much harm when it arrives. But our own behaviors and "fight for yourself above all else" attitude could prove disastrous. I implore you all. Temper fear with reason, panic with patience and uncertainty with education. We have an opportunity to learn a great deal about health hygiene and limiting the spread of innumerable transmissible diseases in our society. Let's meet this challenge together in the best spirit of compassion for others, patience, and above all, an unfailing effort to seek truth, facts and knowledge as opposed to conjecture, speculation and catastrophizing. Facts not fear. Clean hands. Open hearts. Our children will thank us for it. " . But when I am saying it has the potential to kill more than the flu, that's also experts I've heard that from. I think we agree we shouldn't panic but do need to take more care with hygiene though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In the last year 16,000 people died of the flu in the UK but because that’s an old Illness we dint hear about it " Thousands die every year from flu but that’s not the point. Flu has a vaccine - fair enough it’s a ‘best guess’ vaccine but that helps prevent it from being worse than it is. Covid-19 is new - we don’t know where it’s going to end and there is no vaccine. It spreads more readily, in incubates differently and therefore more will unfortunately die from it. People can’t keep compairing it to seasonal flu. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In the last year 16,000 people died of the flu in the UK but because that’s an old Illness we dint hear about it Thousands die every year from flu but that’s not the point. Flu has a vaccine - fair enough it’s a ‘best guess’ vaccine but that helps prevent it from being worse than it is. Covid-19 is new - we don’t know where it’s going to end and there is no vaccine. It spreads more readily, in incubates differently and therefore more will unfortunately die from it. People can’t keep compairing it to seasonal flu. " China appear to have it under control ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In the last year 16,000 people died of the flu in the UK but because that’s an old Illness we dint hear about it Thousands die every year from flu but that’s not the point. Flu has a vaccine - fair enough it’s a ‘best guess’ vaccine but that helps prevent it from being worse than it is. Covid-19 is new - we don’t know where it’s going to end and there is no vaccine. It spreads more readily, in incubates differently and therefore more will unfortunately die from it. People can’t keep compairing it to seasonal flu. China appear to have it under control ..." They appear to be making headway but they’ve been dealing with this for longer than us and their quarantine procedures were more stringent. I hope their measures work though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Haha it's quite funny how people are worrying so much have you seen the statistics for deaths in the world any way with out this virus more people die from snake bites every day than have died from this virus in one day and I for one have never seen a snake in the wild if your going to catch it you will and if your gonna die from it you will so no point worying to much. It isn't about the current numbers, it's about the potential. If we take no measures we be dying in the hundreds of thousands maybe millions. " The thing is, those if us saying it's just flu aren't saying take no precautions. That's just what the panicked among us want you to believe. Absolutely follow government guidelines. Wash your hands (as you should regardless of new viruses), use antibacterial or antiviral gels, ring helplines, get tested just don't panic. Yes confirmed cases are increasing but so far, in this country, the deaths are not increasing at the same rate are they? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. " No it wasn’t and isn’t ‘just flu’ you’re right there babs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Over 100,000 people die from Coronary heart disease each year in the UK. No doubt the same people who are hoarding toilet paper are having 'extra fries' with their burger as we speak. Unfortunately most people are risk illiterate. Here is what a Canadian infectious disease has written. I'm a doctor and an Infectious Diseases Specialist. I've been at this for more than 20 years seeing sick patients on a daily basis. I have worked in inner city hospitals and in the poorest slums of Africa. HIV-AIDS, Hepatitis,TB, SARS, Measles, Shingles, Whooping cough, Diphtheria...there is little I haven't been exposed to in my profession. And with notable exception of SARS, very little has left me feeling vulnerable, overwhelmed or downright scared. I am not scared of Covid-19. I am concerned about the implications of a novel infectious agent that has spread the world over and continues to find new footholds in different soil. I am rightly concerned for the welfare of those who are elderly, in frail health or disenfranchised who stand to suffer mostly, and disproportionately, at the hands of this new scourge. But I am not scared of Covid-19. What I am scared about is the loss of reason and wave of fear that has induced the masses of society into a spellbinding spiral of panic, stockpiling obscene quantities of anything that could fill a bomb shelter adequately in a post-apocalyptic world. I am scared of the N95 masks that are stolen from hospitals and urgent care clinics where they are actually needed for front line healthcare providers and instead are being donned in airports, malls, and coffee lounges, perpetuating even more fear and suspicion of others. I am scared that our hospitals will be overwhelmed with anyone who thinks they " probably don't have it but may as well get checked out no matter what because you just never know..." and those with heart failure, emphysema, pneumonia and strokes will pay the price for overfilled ER waiting rooms with only so many doctors and nurses to assess. I am scared that travel restrictions will become so far reaching that weddings will be canceled, graduations missed and family reunions will not materialize. And well, even that big party called the Olympic Games...that could be kyboshed too. Can you even imagine? I'm scared those same epidemic fears will limit trade, harm partnerships in multiple sectors, business and otherwise and ultimately culminate in a global recession. But mostly, I'm scared about what message we are telling our kids when faced with a threat. Instead of reason, rationality, openmindedness and altruism, we are telling them to panic, be fearful, suspicious, reactionary and self-interested. Covid-19 is nowhere near over. It will be coming to a city, a hospital, a friend, even a family member near you at some point. Expect it. Stop waiting to be surprised further. The fact is the virus itself will not likely do much harm when it arrives. But our own behaviors and "fight for yourself above all else" attitude could prove disastrous. I implore you all. Temper fear with reason, panic with patience and uncertainty with education. We have an opportunity to learn a great deal about health hygiene and limiting the spread of innumerable transmissible diseases in our society. Let's meet this challenge together in the best spirit of compassion for others, patience, and above all, an unfailing effort to seek truth, facts and knowledge as opposed to conjecture, speculation and catastrophizing. Facts not fear. Clean hands. Open hearts. Our children will thank us for it. " I like this! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. " Yes. I agree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. I know. But a lot of people were saying we need to stop being snowflakes. Now I think that argument has been comprehensively proven wrong and most people now accept it is far more serious. " Not me. I genuinely believe its mass scare mongering, to deflect from, and give an excuse as to why there is possibly a global recession on the cards. I know a fair few production based work places been quiet for a while, before this come out, then booom.. heres the reason.. im not worried one iota | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Over 100,000 people die from Coronary heart disease each year in the UK. No doubt the same people who are hoarding toilet paper are having 'extra fries' with their burger as we speak. Unfortunately most people are risk illiterate. Here is what a Canadian infectious disease has written. I'm a doctor and an Infectious Diseases Specialist. I've been at this for more than 20 years seeing sick patients on a daily basis. I have worked in inner city hospitals and in the poorest slums of Africa. HIV-AIDS, Hepatitis,TB, SARS, Measles, Shingles, Whooping cough, Diphtheria...there is little I haven't been exposed to in my profession. And with notable exception of SARS, very little has left me feeling vulnerable, overwhelmed or downright scared. I am not scared of Covid-19. I am concerned about the implications of a novel infectious agent that has spread the world over and continues to find new footholds in different soil. I am rightly concerned for the welfare of those who are elderly, in frail health or disenfranchised who stand to suffer mostly, and disproportionately, at the hands of this new scourge. But I am not scared of Covid-19. What I am scared about is the loss of reason and wave of fear that has induced the masses of society into a spellbinding spiral of panic, stockpiling obscene quantities of anything that could fill a bomb shelter adequately in a post-apocalyptic world. I am scared of the N95 masks that are stolen from hospitals and urgent care clinics where they are actually needed for front line healthcare providers and instead are being donned in airports, malls, and coffee lounges, perpetuating even more fear and suspicion of others. I am scared that our hospitals will be overwhelmed with anyone who thinks they " probably don't have it but may as well get checked out no matter what because you just never know..." and those with heart failure, emphysema, pneumonia and strokes will pay the price for overfilled ER waiting rooms with only so many doctors and nurses to assess. I am scared that travel restrictions will become so far reaching that weddings will be canceled, graduations missed and family reunions will not materialize. And well, even that big party called the Olympic Games...that could be kyboshed too. Can you even imagine? I'm scared those same epidemic fears will limit trade, harm partnerships in multiple sectors, business and otherwise and ultimately culminate in a global recession. But mostly, I'm scared about what message we are telling our kids when faced with a threat. Instead of reason, rationality, openmindedness and altruism, we are telling them to panic, be fearful, suspicious, reactionary and self-interested. Covid-19 is nowhere near over. It will be coming to a city, a hospital, a friend, even a family member near you at some point. Expect it. Stop waiting to be surprised further. The fact is the virus itself will not likely do much harm when it arrives. But our own behaviors and "fight for yourself above all else" attitude could prove disastrous. I implore you all. Temper fear with reason, panic with patience and uncertainty with education. We have an opportunity to learn a great deal about health hygiene and limiting the spread of innumerable transmissible diseases in our society. Let's meet this challenge together in the best spirit of compassion for others, patience, and above all, an unfailing effort to seek truth, facts and knowledge as opposed to conjecture, speculation and catastrophizing. Facts not fear. Clean hands. Open hearts. Our children will thank us for it. " Now this is the line the media should be taking. Spot on! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. I know. But a lot of people were saying we need to stop being snowflakes. Now I think that argument has been comprehensively proven wrong and most people now accept it is far more serious. Not me. I genuinely believe its mass scare mongering, to deflect from, and give an excuse as to why there is possibly a global recession on the cards. I know a fair few production based work places been quiet for a while, before this come out, then booom.. heres the reason.. im not worried one iota" How can it be scaremongering when people are dying? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. I know. But a lot of people were saying we need to stop being snowflakes. Now I think that argument has been comprehensively proven wrong and most people now accept it is far more serious. Not me. I genuinely believe its mass scare mongering, to deflect from, and give an excuse as to why there is possibly a global recession on the cards. I know a fair few production based work places been quiet for a while, before this come out, then booom.. heres the reason.. im not worried one iota How can it be scaremongering when people are dying? " People die of pretty much everything every day. The hysteria outweighs the risk. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. I know. But a lot of people were saying we need to stop being snowflakes. Now I think that argument has been comprehensively proven wrong and most people now accept it is far more serious. Not me. I genuinely believe its mass scare mongering, to deflect from, and give an excuse as to why there is possibly a global recession on the cards. I know a fair few production based work places been quiet for a while, before this come out, then booom.. heres the reason.. im not worried one iota How can it be scaremongering when people are dying? People die of pretty much everything every day. The hysteria outweighs the risk." Yes people do die everyday from all sorts of things but that’s not the issue at the moment. They don’t isolate countries for nothing, the risk is real. There isn’t mass hysteria. There are some daft folk buying excessive amounts of toilet rolls. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Washing your hands can help resolve many of the death rates listed for flu etc. If people actually did this more often then those people wouldn't be dying in such large numbers either. There are lazy, ignorant people everywhere and one day they will die from interaction from someone just as lazy as themselves ... that is their comeuppance. Its those that are hygienic and considerate of others that don't deserve to die but in a world with those others they're screwed ... bless them ... " Good lord. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lets fuck " Have you been tested? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lets fuck Have you been tested? " By who ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lets fuck Have you been tested? By who ? " Me! I’ll test you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lets fuck Have you been tested? By who ? Me! I’ll test you " Tart! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lets fuck Have you been tested? By who ? Me! I’ll test you Tart! " He loves it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lets fuck Have you been tested? By who ? Me! I’ll test you Tart! He loves it " I do ! Plus your anus look so tight when your cough | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Washing your hands can help resolve many of the death rates listed for flu etc. If people actually did this more often then those people wouldn't be dying in such large numbers either. There are lazy, ignorant people everywhere and one day they will die from interaction from someone just as lazy as themselves ... that is their comeuppance. Its those that are hygienic and considerate of others that don't deserve to die but in a world with those others they're screwed ... bless them ... Good lord. " Thanks for the input ... not sure what it means though? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. I know. But a lot of people were saying we need to stop being snowflakes. Now I think that argument has been comprehensively proven wrong and most people now accept it is far more serious. Not me. I genuinely believe its mass scare mongering, to deflect from, and give an excuse as to why there is possibly a global recession on the cards. I know a fair few production based work places been quiet for a while, before this come out, then booom.. heres the reason.. im not worried one iota How can it be scaremongering when people are dying? " People die of flu all the time, and other things that wouldnt kill already healthy people. This coumtry has 65+ million ppl and about 500 cases of this, with approx 15 deaths, all of people who were already poorly. Its my opinion thats its blown out of proportion to distract us from other issues | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Google days 16,000 people died of flu I'm the UK last year, a bit more than 4! " Multiple thousands die every flu season worldwide but it doesn’t alter the current situation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Google days 16,000 people died of flu I'm the UK last year, a bit more than 4! Multiple thousands die every flu season worldwide but it doesn’t alter the current situation. " Exactly and flu doesn't spread like this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It never was ‘just’ flu. I know. But a lot of people were saying we need to stop being snowflakes. Now I think that argument has been comprehensively proven wrong and most people now accept it is far more serious. Not me. I genuinely believe its mass scare mongering, to deflect from, and give an excuse as to why there is possibly a global recession on the cards. I know a fair few production based work places been quiet for a while, before this come out, then booom.. heres the reason.. im not worried one iota How can it be scaremongering when people are dying? People die of flu all the time, and other things that wouldnt kill already healthy people. This coumtry has 65+ million ppl and about 500 cases of this, with approx 15 deaths, all of people who were already poorly. Its my opinion thats its blown out of proportion to distract us from other issues" There are 6 deaths so far in the uk. It doesn’t matter what people generally die of. We’re talking about the unknown with this one. So you think the WHO are in on this conspiracy? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. " Do you work for the media, This is the sort of scaremongering they peddle 24/7. Let's look at World Health Organization facts, that's a recognised official organisation not your mate down the pub or the tabloids. As is March 11th: 125,000 confirmed cases in 120 countries. 4,500 have died. 67,000 have fully recovered. Now, I'm sure even your small tabloid reading brain can work out that even with the deaths over 50% so far infected have recovered. And let's not forget the 125,000 figure is since December 2019, NOT how many are infected now. So go and count your toilet roll and stop trolling. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Google days 16,000 people died of flu I'm the UK last year, a bit more than 4! Multiple thousands die every flu season worldwide but it doesn’t alter the current situation. " I don't remember any news coverage or MPs spouting about what their doing last year, do you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Google days 16,000 people died of flu I'm the UK last year, a bit more than 4! Multiple thousands die every flu season worldwide but it doesn’t alter the current situation. I don't remember any news coverage or MPs spouting about what their doing last year, do you?" I don’t understand what you mean? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Google days 16,000 people died of flu I'm the UK last year, a bit more than 4! Multiple thousands die every flu season worldwide but it doesn’t alter the current situation. I don't remember any news coverage or MPs spouting about what their doing last year, do you?" If you mean what did they say or do about it last year then what they did was have a flu vaccination campaign. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Google days 16,000 people died of flu I'm the UK last year, a bit more than 4! Multiple thousands die every flu season worldwide but it doesn’t alter the current situation. Exactly and flu doesn't spread like this. " Flu spreads exactly the same way, and in some cases the virus is active outside the body for up to 24 hours (nhs website). The difference is that this is new, so people have a lower resistance and there's no vaccine, yet. The death rate for Covid-19 is a bit higher than flu as a result. Bare in mind most who get flu will have minor symptoms and don't get it verified. Whilst it is important to do our best to contain the virus, I think some people are overreacting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Haha it's quite funny how people are worrying so much have you seen the statistics for deaths in the world any way with out this virus more people die from snake bites every day than have died from this virus in one day and I for one have never seen a snake in the wild if your going to catch it you will and if your gonna die from it you will so no point worying to much." It doesn't multiply in a linear fashion, so if we just do nothing at all then most of the population will be infected by late April and up to two million people could die in the UK alone. Do you honestly think that China and Italy would have taken the steps they have if it wasn't absolutely necessary? The reason the death toll is comparatively low at the moment is precisely because of the measures that have been put in place around the world to help prevent its spread. The level of ignorance shown by some people is staggering. Taking preventative measures now could potentially save hundreds of thousands of lives, including members of your own family. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Haha it's quite funny how people are worrying so much have you seen the statistics for deaths in the world any way with out this virus more people die from snake bites every day than have died from this virus in one day and I for one have never seen a snake in the wild if your going to catch it you will and if your gonna die from it you will so no point worying to much. It doesn't multiply in a linear fashion, so if we just do nothing at all then most of the population will be infected by late April and up to two million people could die in the UK alone. Do you honestly think that China and Italy would have taken the steps they have if it wasn't absolutely necessary? The reason the death toll is comparatively low at the moment is precisely because of the measures that have been put in place around the world to help prevent its spread. The level of ignorance shown by some people is staggering. Taking preventative measures now could potentially save hundreds of thousands of lives, including members of your own family. " But they don’t want to believe that the measures have helped. They just want to say it’s not as bad as flu. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. " Who is overreacting? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In the last year 16,000 people died of the flu in the UK but because that’s an old Illness we dint hear about it Thousands die every year from flu but that’s not the point. Flu has a vaccine - fair enough it’s a ‘best guess’ vaccine but that helps prevent it from being worse than it is. Covid-19 is new - we don’t know where it’s going to end and there is no vaccine. It spreads more readily, in incubates differently and therefore more will unfortunately die from it. People can’t keep compairing it to seasonal flu. " Most people make a full recovery from this virus and therefore have built up a certain amount of immunity in they're bodies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. " It doesn't spread in a linear fashion, it spreads exponentially. If preventative measures are not taken, 400 today could be 1,000 by the weekend and 8,000 the following weekend 'cause the chills, they're multiplying. Bugger it, I give up. Perhaps it's time for a good clear out anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. Who is overreacting? " All the idiots panic buying hand gel and loo rolls | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In the last year 16,000 people died of the flu in the UK but because that’s an old Illness we dint hear about it Thousands die every year from flu but that’s not the point. Flu has a vaccine - fair enough it’s a ‘best guess’ vaccine but that helps prevent it from being worse than it is. Covid-19 is new - we don’t know where it’s going to end and there is no vaccine. It spreads more readily, in incubates differently and therefore more will unfortunately die from it. People can’t keep compairing it to seasonal flu. Most people make a full recovery from this virus and therefore have built up a certain amount of immunity in they're bodies. " That's right the majority will shake it off anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Every shop in italy is now closed except food shops" If people can't work how are they supposed to buy food | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. " It would be in perspective if those 400 would be the only people to contract the virus. They estimate 50 to 70% of us will eventually catch it. That's a best case of 32 million people. And if the mortality rate is anywhere just over 3.4% that gives you 1,105,000 fatalities. There's perspective. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/cZFhjMQrVts 15 minutes or so long but Infectious Disease Expert Michael Osterholm discussing and explaining Coronavirus with Joe Rogan." I watched the full episode. He seems to think that we may be better off getting out and about and letting it run its course. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. It would be in perspective if those 400 would be the only people to contract the virus. They estimate 50 to 70% of us will eventually catch it. That's a best case of 32 million people. And if the mortality rate is anywhere just over 3.4% that gives you 1,105,000 fatalities. There's perspective. " Where did you come up.with 3.4%? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. As you say an estimate which means they don't have a clue. It would be in perspective if those 400 would be the only people to contract the virus. They estimate 50 to 70% of us will eventually catch it. That's a best case of 32 million people. And if the mortality rate is anywhere just over 3.4% that gives you 1,105,000 fatalities. There's perspective. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. It would be in perspective if those 400 would be the only people to contract the virus. They estimate 50 to 70% of us will eventually catch it. That's a best case of 32 million people. And if the mortality rate is anywhere just over 3.4% that gives you 1,105,000 fatalities. There's perspective. Where did you come up.with 3.4%?" It's the fugure that's been bandied about. I've already discussed the fact everyone has their own mortality rate. Mainly because mortality rate is not something that can be calculated until AFTER a pandemic. So it's all guesswork as was using 50% rather than 70%. What do you think it is? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. It would be in perspective if those 400 would be the only people to contract the virus. They estimate 50 to 70% of us will eventually catch it. That's a best case of 32 million people. And if the mortality rate is anywhere just over 3.4% that gives you 1,105,000 fatalities. There's perspective. Where did you come up.with 3.4%? It's the fugure that's been bandied about. I've already discussed the fact everyone has their own mortality rate. Mainly because mortality rate is not something that can be calculated until AFTER a pandemic. So it's all guesswork as was using 50% rather than 70%. What do you think it is?" Rest my case you ssid yourself it's guesswork | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. It would be in perspective if those 400 would be the only people to contract the virus. They estimate 50 to 70% of us will eventually catch it. That's a best case of 32 million people. And if the mortality rate is anywhere just over 3.4% that gives you 1,105,000 fatalities. There's perspective. Where did you come up.with 3.4%?" "The global mortality rate for COVID-19 is 3.4%, WHO said on March 2. This virus causes more severe illness than the flu, but doesn't spread as efficiently, the director-general said" https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-updates.html | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. It would be in perspective if those 400 would be the only people to contract the virus. They estimate 50 to 70% of us will eventually catch it. That's a best case of 32 million people. And if the mortality rate is anywhere just over 3.4% that gives you 1,105,000 fatalities. There's perspective. Where did you come up.with 3.4%? It's the fugure that's been bandied about. I've already discussed the fact everyone has their own mortality rate. Mainly because mortality rate is not something that can be calculated until AFTER a pandemic. So it's all guesswork as was using 50% rather than 70%. What do you think it is? Rest my case you ssid yourself it's guesswork " Maybe that's a better perspective. We don't know what the final death toll will be. In term of a worst case POTTENTIAL then you have 80% of 66.44 million who may contract COVID-19. That's 53,152,000 people who may become infected. Despite a 2.4% of babyboomers and 1.5million population over 85.... Given the WHO figure of 3.4% mortality. Potentially 1,807,168 people dying in the UK alone. A tad more than 400... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. It would be in perspective if those 400 would be the only people to contract the virus. They estimate 50 to 70% of us will eventually catch it. That's a best case of 32 million people. And if the mortality rate is anywhere just over 3.4% that gives you 1,105,000 fatalities. There's perspective. Where did you come up.with 3.4%? It's the fugure that's been bandied about. I've already discussed the fact everyone has their own mortality rate. Mainly because mortality rate is not something that can be calculated until AFTER a pandemic. So it's all guesswork as was using 50% rather than 70%. What do you think it is? Rest my case you ssid yourself it's guesswork Maybe that's a better perspective. We don't know what the final death toll will be. In term of a worst case POTTENTIAL then you have 80% of 66.44 million who may contract COVID-19. That's 53,152,000 people who may become infected. Despite a 2.4% of babyboomers and 1.5million population over 85.... Given the WHO figure of 3.4% mortality. Potentially 1,807,168 people dying in the UK alone. A tad more than 400..." If those figures come to pass it's still low compared to the overall population of the Uk. Where do these figures come from ? If this is a new virus we have nothing to compare to so it's a guesstimate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wht are there so many cases in Italy. Its not next to China. " It was brought in by one person. Mattia. Marathon runner at outbreak epicentre infected 13 people including his pregnant wife, two doctors, three bar-goers and a 77-year-old woman who died | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. It would be in perspective if those 400 would be the only people to contract the virus. They estimate 50 to 70% of us will eventually catch it. That's a best case of 32 million people. And if the mortality rate is anywhere just over 3.4% that gives you 1,105,000 fatalities. There's perspective. Where did you come up.with 3.4%? It's the fugure that's been bandied about. I've already discussed the fact everyone has their own mortality rate. Mainly because mortality rate is not something that can be calculated until AFTER a pandemic. So it's all guesswork as was using 50% rather than 70%. What do you think it is? Rest my case you ssid yourself it's guesswork Maybe that's a better perspective. We don't know what the final death toll will be. In term of a worst case POTTENTIAL then you have 80% of 66.44 million who may contract COVID-19. That's 53,152,000 people who may become infected. Despite a 2.4% of babyboomers and 1.5million population over 85.... Given the WHO figure of 3.4% mortality. Potentially 1,807,168 people dying in the UK alone. A tad more than 400... If those figures come to pass it's still low compared to the overall population of the Uk. Where do these figures come from ? If this is a new virus we have nothing to compare to so it's a guesstimate." The population of the country os known. The rate of infection transmission is known in uncontrolled environment. (Ie. Without Quarantine measures etc) When you have an R0 and a population then you can build a mathematical model of the spread. A mathematical model at Johm Hopkins predicted 500 000 I believe. It all depends on what quarantine measures we take that will determine the final outcome. Which I think we can all agree we don't know yet. Spanish flu lasted 3 years. We are 4 months into a virus that may only have a vaccine in 12 -18 months. To say we only have 400 cases and 6 deaths at this stage is like saying we only have a match in a dry forest. It could be nothing but it could also be huge. We don't know. What we do know is it hits the aged hard. We have a lot of 80+ people in the UK. So the threat is there. People compare this to car deaths etc. But don't look at percentages. For instace if 110 000 people started driving cars and after 4 months 4000 were dead we'd give the whole car thing a rethink..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wht are there so many cases in Italy. Its not next to China. It was brought in by one person. Mattia. Marathon runner at outbreak epicentre infected 13 people including his pregnant wife, two doctors, three bar-goers and a 77-year-old woman who died" Thanks... I must have missed that... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sadly it hits the aged hard it's inevitable. More die from the ordinary flu. We all die of something one day. This corona is just scaremongering. Most people will fight this off. People are loosing their jobs and everything because employers can't afford to keep staff. " True. Most people will just fight it off. Some people will pass it on to others who will die. Not scary for some, scary for those at risk. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-uk-set-to-move-to-delay-phase-schools-could-close-and-major-events-cancelled-11955695 Let's see what tomorrow brings..." I for one will not be putting the news on but will be getting on with my day | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. " Wrong - more people still died from the flu - coronavirus is more infectious but less deadly than the seasonal flu. Simple fact if the whole planet caught the seasonal flu then death rate would be higher than if the whole planet caught coronavirus. You should take same precautions and hygiene either way! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. Wrong - more people still died from the flu - coronavirus is more infectious but less deadly than the seasonal flu. Simple fact if the whole planet caught the seasonal flu then death rate would be higher than if the whole planet caught coronavirus. You should take same precautions and hygiene either way! " The mortality rate for Covid19 is a lot higher...about 1.4%. For seasonal flu it's only 0.1%. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. Wrong - more people still died from the flu - coronavirus is more infectious but less deadly than the seasonal flu. Simple fact if the whole planet caught the seasonal flu then death rate would be higher than if the whole planet caught coronavirus. You should take same precautions and hygiene either way! " The difference is that seasonal flu is much harder to catch than covid 19 because nearly everybody has some level of immunity already, either through annual vaccination or having been exposed to similar strains in previous years. So if one person has flu they may pass it to a few people that are in close contact, who may pass it to a few others, but not many will actually get sick. On the whole, flu outbreaks tend to die down. Even so, annually a few million people get flu, and a few tens of thousands die - somewhere between 1 in 1000 and 1 in 100. What we are seeing with covid 19 is that people have got next to no resistance, it is transmitted really easily, and it spreads really fast. The outbreaks do not die down, they grow, unless extraordinary measures are taken to disallow people from coming into contact with each other. We have doctors catching it, even when they are taking every precaution with gloves, masks, protective clothing, disinfection etc. Every indication so far is that there is a strong possibility of a high percentage of the world's population catching it within the coming few months. And the stats for the death rate are higher than for normal seasonal flu, at between 1 in a 100 up to 1 in 20. So we have a possibility of more people catching covid than flu, and more of those who do catch it will die. Death rate higher on both counts. World population is over 7 billion, so could be something like 100 times as many people catch covid as catch flu. And maybe five times as many of those die than they would of flu. Total deaths worldwide could get into hundreds of millions. So yes it is similar to flu - but worse on all counts. Smallpox killed about 500 million people in total throughout all history. Covid 19 has the potential to do that many within a couple of months. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If they are so uselse's why don't you have a go at sorting it? ! I'm sure your qualified and experienced to do a great great job. " Errrm.... it's not my job, if they paid me I would have said pandemic 6 fucking months ago. We pay these people to sort it, but they don't. They don't need to be rocket scientists to know when an epidemic is going to be a pandemic. They are scared to say the truth or have an agenda which usually is the case. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. " Firstly it was never ever just a flu! People need to start educating themselves seriously this is ridiculous were in the uk and we think so backwardly. It's not about the number dying it's about the contagion risk factor first. All humans are potential carriers thus potential agents of death. Protect yourself now so you can protect all you love and your friends and neighbours and society as a whole. Seriously just akin to a flu what the heck hahahaha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If they are so uselse's why don't you have a go at sorting it? ! I'm sure your qualified and experienced to do a great great job. Errrm.... it's not my job, if they paid me I would have said pandemic 6 fucking months ago. We pay these people to sort it, but they don't. They don't need to be rocket scientists to know when an epidemic is going to be a pandemic. They are scared to say the truth or have an agenda which usually is the case. " Just coincidentally both Trump and the WHO (who receive funding from USA) refused to call this a pandemic. But after the markets crashed they did 180 degree U-Turns. This despite the situation being better in China than when it wasn't a pandemic. The definition of a pandemic is a disease spread over a wide area involving a large number of people. Something it has been, as you correctly point out for some time now. Nothing has really changed except the stock markets tanking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If anyone is interested in the science of corona go to BBC iPlayer and search Inside Science today’s date. The programme covers the complexities behind the virus, pathogens, mutation etc was very interesting " Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Haha it's quite funny how people are worrying so much have you seen the statistics for deaths in the world any way with out this virus more people die from snake bites every day than have died from this virus in one day and I for one have never seen a snake in the wild if your going to catch it you will and if your gonna die from it you will so no point worying to much." I would try to explain the folly of this approach but infer it will fall on deaf ears. By the end of this I think snakes will because safer option. As a matter of interest what IS the figure for snake bite deaths worldwide? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If anyone is interested in the science of corona go to BBC iPlayer and search Inside Science today’s date. The programme covers the complexities behind the virus, pathogens, mutation etc was very interesting Thank you " BBC Sounds! Not iplayer | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put this into perspective. About 400 have corona compare that to the average pooulation of the Uk 65 million it's barely a drop in the ocean. Everyone needs to just calm down. This is such an overreaction. We've had bird flu swine flu. " 400 and likely to grow exponentially. You do know what exponentially means right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Haha it's quite funny how people are worrying so much have you seen the statistics for deaths in the world any way with out this virus more people die from snake bites every day than have died from this virus in one day and I for one have never seen a snake in the wild if your going to catch it you will and if your gonna die from it you will so no point worying to much. I would try to explain the folly of this approach but infer it will fall on deaf ears. By the end of this I think snakes will because safer option. As a matter of interest what IS the figure for snake bite deaths worldwide?" I can't understand why if one discusses COVID-19 then one is "worrying" but if one discusses anything else like "does peeing sitting down make me gay?" it is not worrying. Who makes up these rules of what we are allowed to discuss and not discuss? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. Firstly it was never ever just a flu! People need to start educating themselves seriously this is ridiculous were in the uk and we think so backwardly. It's not about the number dying it's about the contagion risk factor first. All humans are potential carriers thus potential agents of death. Protect yourself now so you can protect all you love and your friends and neighbours and society as a whole. Seriously just akin to a flu what the heck hahahaha" I agree the trouble was too many Govt's including the idiot who is "Donald" tried to play seriousness of the situation down for Political gain. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to understand the seriousness of this but also the reality, and not result in panic actions that fundamentally make the situation worse. People buying up tons of hand sanitizer is stupid - you can have all the supplies of it, but if nobody else has now got it, you might aswell just go snog someone with coronavirus. We all need to be clean to limit the infection. You can Sanatize your hands but then touch something that someone else hasn’t been able to sanatize because you brought 500 gallons of it - means they’ve contaminated what you touching and your sanatizing is no longer effective. Reality is healthy people catching it is likely to result in then being unwell but not dying - the flu more likely to kill them. So it’s important that people with it keep themselves away from people who wouldn’t do so well if they caught it. Which leads on to silly concepts of closing schools etc - kids unlikely to suffer if they catch it, but closing a school while parents are still working will likely result in grand parents etc caring, who maybe at risk. I’d rather my healthy kids have a bad cold for a few weeks than my parents die. The death toll will rise - because of the level of contagious, but not cus it’s worse than the flu in severity but just because it spreads more. Remember 17000 people in uk alone died last year of flu - globally so far only just over 5000 have died of this, that number will rise but only because of rapid spread and likelihood those with health issues will catch it. Which leads to the point of healthy people putting un healthy people at risk through Selfish behaviours. People need to remain calm and follow advice, that way we will deal with this and not make the situation worse, because aside from getting a bad cold or risking others from death - the effects on jobs, on peoples lives will also be massive, " "The death toll will rise - because of the level of contagious, but not cus it’s worse than the flu in severity but just because it spreads more" Really??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. Firstly it was never ever just a flu! People need to start educating themselves seriously this is ridiculous were in the uk and we think so backwardly. It's not about the number dying it's about the contagion risk factor first. All humans are potential carriers thus potential agents of death. Protect yourself now so you can protect all you love and your friends and neighbours and society as a whole. Seriously just akin to a flu what the heck hahahaha I agree the trouble was too many Govt's including the idiot who is "Donald" tried to play seriousness of the situation down for Political gain." It doesnt matter what governments say or do I mean do people still believe the lies peddled by leaders?? Dont people in the United kingdom if not rest of Europe know when the shit has hit the fan? It was so so obvious that this was going to be a crisis and yet people did nothing. I since mid to end January have stocked up on masks gloves gels and food stuff etc I've made sure everything is there and then I've self isolate myself to not become part of the problem. I'm lucky in that I can work from home but that aside atleast i saw what was going on. Why couldn't everyone else? Ignorance is no longer an excuse! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Far more people are dying as a proportion of those infected. Although I'm not personally worried for myself as I'm fairly fit and healthy. I will be taking precautions and avoiding contact with elderly or Ill relatives if I have just a cold. I will also work from home if I'm ill. Firstly it was never ever just a flu! People need to start educating themselves seriously this is ridiculous were in the uk and we think so backwardly. It's not about the number dying it's about the contagion risk factor first. All humans are potential carriers thus potential agents of death. Protect yourself now so you can protect all you love and your friends and neighbours and society as a whole. Seriously just akin to a flu what the heck hahahaha I agree the trouble was too many Govt's including the idiot who is "Donald" tried to play seriousness of the situation down for Political gain. It doesnt matter what governments say or do I mean do people still believe the lies peddled by leaders?? Dont people in the United kingdom if not rest of Europe know when the shit has hit the fan? It was so so obvious that this was going to be a crisis and yet people did nothing. I since mid to end January have stocked up on masks gloves gels and food stuff etc I've made sure everything is there and then I've self isolate myself to not become part of the problem. I'm lucky in that I can work from home but that aside atleast i saw what was going on. Why couldn't everyone else? Ignorance is no longer an excuse! " For some of us what would happen was inevitable. For others it's happened and they are still saying it won't happen. Nothing will convince them. Normalcy Bias. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What I don’t understand is how they get the figures for deaths from flu. I’ve never told the GP when I’ve got flu. If they don’t know how many people get flu in a year how can they give a percentage for the number of deaths. With Covid-19 not everyone is being tested so again I don’t see how they can get a percentage for deaths. " From what I’ve read they think far more people have it than the figures show, but they are mild cases that don’t seek any treatment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The government plan to stop testing most people will mean that we don't have numbers any longer that tell us how it's affecting the population. The callous approach to let most people get infected, with many deaths is inexcusable. We're not taking the right approach, hence being so different to other countries " Are you an expert? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The government plan to stop testing most people will mean that we don't have numbers any longer that tell us how it's affecting the population. The callous approach to let most people get infected, with many deaths is inexcusable. We're not taking the right approach, hence being so different to other countries " What would you do differently then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Have you actually read the government's approach. It seems quite sensible to me. it's not a knee jerk reaction response it's by the leading scientist's this country has. It's not by a gaggle in a pub putting the world to rights who haven't a GCSE between them." This^^^ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What I don’t understand is how they get the figures for deaths from flu. I’ve never told the GP when I’ve got flu. If they don’t know how many people get flu in a year how can they give a percentage for the number of deaths. With Covid-19 not everyone is being tested so again I don’t see how they can get a percentage for deaths. " Correct - they are relative, but they will know if you died of either. So figures for both cases of people getting it are probably higher, but the relative ratio would be the same, as in both they are aware of who died. At the moment there are tons more things that are killing us all more effectively. There is equally tons of things we do that when any illness comes along means we also even more at risk of death if it, like obesity, diet and way we live. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The government plan to stop testing most people will mean that we don't have numbers any longer that tell us how it's affecting the population. The callous approach to let most people get infected, with many deaths is inexcusable. We're not taking the right approach, hence being so different to other countries Are you an expert?" An expert pandemic virologist, I'm not. Even if I was, this current virus is novel, with its own distinctive features. What we can assume is that it's going to be somewhat different, even to other Corona virus type infections and that we should be using the best evidence that we have upon this specific virus and how to minimise the numbers of people that die, as well as sustaining our health service, such that it's able to treat everybody in need. Having a goal of achieving herd immunity levels to this largely unknown virus as our core defence strategy, is not something that we can say is the most reasonable, nor humane approach. It's good that the WHO is critical of this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The government plan to stop testing most people will mean that we don't have numbers any longer that tell us how it's affecting the population. The callous approach to let most people get infected, with many deaths is inexcusable. We're not taking the right approach, hence being so different to other countries Are you an expert? An expert pandemic virologist, I'm not.. " .. so why do you think you know better than the Chief Medical Officer and the Chief Science Advisor, and the huge wealth of experience and skill they and the teams they lead have ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The government plan to stop testing most people will mean that we don't have numbers any longer that tell us how it's affecting the population. The callous approach to let most people get infected, with many deaths is inexcusable. We're not taking the right approach, hence being so different to other countries Are you an expert? An expert pandemic virologist, I'm not.. .. so why do you think you know better than the Chief Medical Officer and the Chief Science Advisor, and the huge wealth of experience and skill they and the teams they lead have ? " It all depends on whether the decision is made on medical grounds i.e what's best for the people, or on budgetary grounds, i.e what's best for the treasury. The argument of saying "do you know better than the chief science advisor" can just as easily be applied by asking does our chief science advisor know better than the WHO? Welcome to the biggest gamble... or scientific human experiment .... of all time. We are talking about 40 million people and according to the BBC 8 million of whom they expect to become seriously ill. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The government plan to stop testing most people will mean that we don't have numbers any longer that tell us how it's affecting the population. The callous approach to let most people get infected, with many deaths is inexcusable. We're not taking the right approach, hence being so different to other countries Are you an expert? An expert pandemic virologist, I'm not.. .. so why do you think you know better than the Chief Medical Officer and the Chief Science Advisor, and the huge wealth of experience and skill they and the teams they lead have ? It all depends on whether the decision is made on medical grounds i.e what's best for the people, or on budgetary grounds, i.e what's best for the treasury. The argument of saying "do you know better than the chief science advisor" can just as easily be applied by asking does our chief science advisor know better than the WHO? Welcome to the biggest gamble... or scientific human experiment .... of all time. We are talking about 40 million people and according to the BBC 8 million of whom they expect to become seriously ill." I’m sticking with the CMA and CSA and the teams of scientists, who only have the best interests of the public in their sights . Indecision and conflicting messages is the last thing we need at the moment . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have to say this made me chuckle... "It can only have been the nudge unit’s idea to get the least trusted man in the nation’s history to tell us that any kind of mass public lockdown would be counterproductive at this stage. Because 20 minutes later, it was immediately like I Am Legend out there"" First it was face masks and hand sanitizer, now its toilet roll and pasta. Next it will be black suits and coffins. Just do the math... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Flu doesn't close schools " No, mass hysteria does | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Flu doesn't close schools No, mass hysteria does " Good grief I think this is way beyond mass hysteria. If you honestly believe it's mass hysteria then you really need to stop burying your head in the sand. Governments are shitting themselves as no one has any ideas how to stop this at the moment and what's next. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Flu doesn't close schools No, mass hysteria does Good grief I think this is way beyond mass hysteria. If you honestly believe it's mass hysteria then you really need to stop burying your head in the sand. Governments are shitting themselves as no one has any ideas how to stop this at the moment and what's next." Indeed it seems no one knows what's next What is the up to date evidence ( not scientific opinion or otherwise) that is leading many to form an opinion and act with such fear I am unaware of any death or suffering rate that warents the response And the prevent hospital from being overwhelmed is also a red herring it is beyond doubt vastly disproportionate to close an entire country bankrupting thousands than it would to find a solution to controlling hospital bed demand The UK has done nothing to prevent any spread the virus has been here weeks If it spreads as claimed there would already be vast numbers and a huge death toll The UK to my mind illustrates exactly how infectious it is without control measures I'm perfectly open to data that explains total global shutdown and the deaths that causes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Flu doesn't close schools No, mass hysteria does " No, the government does, with the odd proviso. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Flu doesn't close schools No, mass hysteria does Good grief I think this is way beyond mass hysteria. If you honestly believe it's mass hysteria then you really need to stop burying your head in the sand. Governments are shitting themselves as no one has any ideas how to stop this at the moment and what's next." Governments are shitting themselves yes I quite agree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Flu doesn't close schools No, mass hysteria does Good grief I think this is way beyond mass hysteria. If you honestly believe it's mass hysteria then you really need to stop burying your head in the sand. Governments are shitting themselves as no one has any ideas how to stop this at the moment and what's next. Indeed it seems no one knows what's next What is the up to date evidence ( not scientific opinion or otherwise) that is leading many to form an opinion and act with such fear I am unaware of any death or suffering rate that warents the response And the prevent hospital from being overwhelmed is also a red herring it is beyond doubt vastly disproportionate to close an entire country bankrupting thousands than it would to find a solution to controlling hospital bed demand The UK has done nothing to prevent any spread the virus has been here weeks If it spreads as claimed there would already be vast numbers and a huge death toll The UK to my mind illustrates exactly how infectious it is without control measures I'm perfectly open to data that explains total global shutdown and the deaths that causes " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Haha it's quite funny how people are worrying so much have you seen the statistics for deaths in the world any way with out this virus more people die from snake bites every day than have died from this virus in one day and I for one have never seen a snake in the wild if your going to catch it you will and if your gonna die from it you will so no point worying to much." dude you are so wrong... The statistics are based on China who coped with the situation... Not one nurse was sent to Italy from the EU or the UK... In two weeks you will see the real statistics... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Flu doesn't close schools No, mass hysteria does Good grief I think this is way beyond mass hysteria. If you honestly believe it's mass hysteria then you really need to stop burying your head in the sand. Governments are shitting themselves as no one has any ideas how to stop this at the moment and what's next. Indeed it seems no one knows what's next What is the up to date evidence ( not scientific opinion or otherwise) that is leading many to form an opinion and act with such fear I am unaware of any death or suffering rate that warents the response And the prevent hospital from being overwhelmed is also a red herring it is beyond doubt vastly disproportionate to close an entire country bankrupting thousands than it would to find a solution to controlling hospital bed demand The UK has done nothing to prevent any spread the virus has been here weeks If it spreads as claimed there would already be vast numbers and a huge death toll The UK to my mind illustrates exactly how infectious it is without control measures I'm perfectly open to data that explains total global shutdown and the deaths that causes " honestly... Dude you have no idea.. China shutdown after 400 cases and they could not stop the rise to 70k if Italy had not shutdown we would have 100k cases by now... Then 1 million the death rate in Italy is 15% and increasing.. Young for guys 23 yrs old on intensive care.. In 10 days there will be no beds for these young guys... Doctors and nurses dying.... 300 people died in Lombardy today... Can you imagine what that looks like... A bomb goes off in Tunisia and kills the tourist industry... This is a bomb of huge proportion... be a hero stay inside.. Don't be responsible for infecting others | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its my opinion thats its blown out of proportion to distract us from other issues" The Illuminati's behind it. Definitely. Or maybe the Freemasons. Yeah, it's definitely the Freemasons. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Flu doesn't close schools No, mass hysteria does Good grief I think this is way beyond mass hysteria. If you honestly believe it's mass hysteria then you really need to stop burying your head in the sand. Governments are shitting themselves as no one has any ideas how to stop this at the moment and what's next." Absolutely this! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its my opinion thats its blown out of proportion to distract us from other issues The Illuminati's behind it. Definitely. Or maybe the Freemasons. Yeah, it's definitely the Freemasons." Don't be ridiculous. It is definitely the No Homers club. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"current mortality rates are meaningless because we don't know how many people have had it. There is close to ZERO community testing. Those that are hospitalised are tested and clearly the people who are more likely to die. You are scare mongering " Yiu make a very good point, we do have little odea how many people are currently infected or how many have been ingected with no really negative result. Therefore yeah we do not have any idea of the mortality rate. I read the other day that, since januatu normal flu has claimed many more lives in America than this. Butbuntil we have an effevtive sfe vaccine, it looks like panic stations in every country it has reached. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Flu doesn't close schools No, mass hysteria does Good grief I think this is way beyond mass hysteria. If you honestly believe it's mass hysteria then you really need to stop burying your head in the sand. Governments are shitting themselves as no one has any ideas how to stop this at the moment and what's next. Indeed it seems no one knows what's next What is the up to date evidence ( not scientific opinion or otherwise) that is leading many to form an opinion and act with such fear I am unaware of any death or suffering rate that warents the response And the prevent hospital from being overwhelmed is also a red herring it is beyond doubt vastly disproportionate to close an entire country bankrupting thousands than it would to find a solution to controlling hospital bed demand The UK has done nothing to prevent any spread the virus has been here weeks If it spreads as claimed there would already be vast numbers and a huge death toll The UK to my mind illustrates exactly how infectious it is without control measures I'm perfectly open to data that explains total global shutdown and the deaths that causes honestly... Dude you have no idea.. China shutdown after 400 cases and they could not stop the rise to 70k if Italy had not shutdown we would have 100k cases by now... Then 1 million the death rate in Italy is 15% and increasing.. Young for guys 23 yrs old on intensive care.. In 10 days there will be no beds for these young guys... Doctors and nurses dying.... 300 people died in Lombardy today... Can you imagine what that looks like... A bomb goes off in Tunisia and kills the tourist industry... This is a bomb of huge proportion... be a hero stay inside.. Don't be responsible for infecting others " Perhaps if you articulate those figures more clearly I would be able to understand and agree I am NOT advocating anyone be a hero or go against advice I'm saying the data I'm aware of does not equate the response I'm certainly not suggesting that the response is not required for something I'll re iterate as you say borders are not respected by virus The virus has been wandering the UK un unfettered for at least 2 months and possibly more if as rampant and deadly as suggested I'd suggest we would now be in serious trouble knee deep in bodies Note I suggest I do not have enough data It is suggested that world wide medical facilities could not cope Seriously the money lost and spend an the global shut down could easily been directed at health Hotels borrowed, staff trained world wide armys utilised beds made All would be simpler (not simple) than a global shutdown requiring every human on the planet to erm conform | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"if your fit and health around 3-4 days flu like symptoms. " yes and for others it's apparently around 11 days or more. Its not the flu | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Bio virus exercise over, its a success, a lot of people will make a lot of money buying cheap stock market shares. Follow the money !!" Wtf?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am still not overly concerned about the actual virus. What concerns me more is the way society is reacting. I've already seen quite a few incidents this past week which make me question how we are going to end up. The risk of riots etc.. they all bother me far more than a virus which while new is still not killing a huge percentage of the population as yet " 8000 people die from the flu in the UK was each year, how many have been related to corona so far - 140 ish. Let’s cow the cows, said Napoleon, Oh and Snowball, why don’t you just fuck off! Apologies to George Orwell. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You need to look at where this is going. It took from early December 2019 to March 5 to hit 100 000 infections. 13 days later we hit 200 000. At this rate we will reach 300 000 about 4 or 5 days. It wont be long and the infected rate will go up by more than 100 000 per day. How many will die before this gets under control? We just passed 10 000. We can no longer trivialise this." Please can you cite where this data came from? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You need to look at where this is going. It took from early December 2019 to March 5 to hit 100 000 infections. 13 days later we hit 200 000. At this rate we will reach 300 000 about 4 or 5 days. It wont be long and the infected rate will go up by more than 100 000 per day. How many will die before this gets under control? We just passed 10 000. We can no longer trivialise this." to be fair I'm not taking much notice of the figures as they arent testing enough people to get anywhere near the real number. I think once they can test for previous infections the numbers will be a be more realistic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Bio virus exercise over, its a success, a lot of people will make a lot of money buying cheap stock market shares. Follow the money !!" Weird! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You need to look at where this is going. It took from early December 2019 to March 5 to hit 100 000 infections. 13 days later we hit 200 000. At this rate we will reach 300 000 about 4 or 5 days. It wont be long and the infected rate will go up by more than 100 000 per day. How many will die before this gets under control? We just passed 10 000. We can no longer trivialise this. to be fair I'm not taking much notice of the figures as they arent testing enough people to get anywhere near the real number. I think once they can test for previous infections the numbers will be a be more realistic " The numbers will be more higher. I've said it on here a few times and I'll repeat that since January I knew about this and made plans to be in self isolation and lockdown expecting this to be over in about a year. The government says about 18months so everyone just prepare for the long haul and self isolate now and get into a lockdown. Btw I also said we should be in lockdown weeks ago and I'm not surprised at all that's the way were going. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You need to look at where this is going. It took from early December 2019 to March 5 to hit 100 000 infections. 13 days later we hit 200 000. At this rate we will reach 300 000 about 4 or 5 days. It wont be long and the infected rate will go up by more than 100 000 per day. How many will die before this gets under control? We just passed 10 000. We can no longer trivialise this. to be fair I'm not taking much notice of the figures as they arent testing enough people to get anywhere near the real number. I think once they can test for previous infections the numbers will be a be more realistic " In other countries they are still testing because that is the only way to defeat the virus. In the UK we are totally unprepared, underfinanced, short staffed and can't be arsed. These figures are coming in from around the world. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You need to look at where this is going. It took from early December 2019 to March 5 to hit 100 000 infections. 13 days later we hit 200 000. At this rate we will reach 300 000 about 4 or 5 days. It wont be long and the infected rate will go up by more than 100 000 per day. How many will die before this gets under control? We just passed 10 000. We can no longer trivialise this. Please can you cite where this data came from?" https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ I've checked these figures against all "official sources" and never found a discrepancy. If you look at the curves they are predictably exponential. I assume that the NHS website has stopped informing us that COVID-19 is "low risk" ????? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have only two questions.. and I know the answers. What exactly was being made at the chemical plant in China that exploded in January? https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3046078/blast-rips-through-chinese-chemical-plant-deemed-unsafe-july and.... when were the first cases of Corona Virus / Covid-19 made public??? Conspiracy theory number 392 " That petro chem plant is over a thousand miles away from Wuhan, and the first case was reported in December...back to conspiracy theory school for you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am still not overly concerned about the actual virus. What concerns me more is the way society is reacting. I've already seen quite a few incidents this past week which make me question how we are going to end up. The risk of riots etc.. they all bother me far more than a virus which while new is still not killing a huge percentage of the population as yet " Our local foodbank was robbed of its entire stock on Wed night by gang of four grown men...i weep for this nation | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am still not overly concerned about the actual virus. What concerns me more is the way society is reacting. I've already seen quite a few incidents this past week which make me question how we are going to end up. The risk of riots etc.. they all bother me far more than a virus which while new is still not killing a huge percentage of the population as yet Our local foodbank was robbed of its entire stock on Wed night by gang of four grown men...i weep for this nation " Will be the first of many. But in two weeks time it will be a capital crime, enforced on the spot by armed soldiers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It was never like the flu. Nobody has resistance and it kills more. I'm hoping the government is better than the Italian government was, as we really need to restrict this quickly. It's a shame it takes almost a week on average to show symptoms, as many will pass it on, in ignorance " I would hate to see what would happen if a something more deadly and virulent appears.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It was never like the flu. Nobody has resistance and it kills more. I'm hoping the government is better than the Italian government was, as we really need to restrict this quickly. It's a shame it takes almost a week on average to show symptoms, as many will pass it on, in ignorance I would hate to see what would happen if a something more deadly and virulent appears...." Deadly and virulent and there will still be voices on here and elsewhere saying that it's just a bit of a cough. But if one of the effects was a 2% chance of permanent male impotence... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is undoubtedly a serious situation but let's keep some perspective in the number of deaths. We haven't been testing people for weeks now unless they are actually admitted to hospital. That means we have absolutely no idea how many are or have been infected, although they estimate its likely 20 or 30 times the reported figure. In contrast, 100% of deaths are reported so it is going to seem like a much higher death rate than is actually the case. " One of the scientific experts was making just this point yesterday in the scientific briefing. The figures are skewed because we are not counting all the infections, but are counting all the deaths | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is undoubtedly a serious situation but let's keep some perspective in the number of deaths. We haven't been testing people for weeks now unless they are actually admitted to hospital. That means we have absolutely no idea how many are or have been infected, although they estimate its likely 20 or 30 times the reported figure. In contrast, 100% of deaths are reported so it is going to seem like a much higher death rate than is actually the case. One of the scientific experts was making just this point yesterday in the scientific briefing. The figures are skewed because we are not counting all the infections, but are counting all the deaths" Actually on a CFR there are 99,509 closed cases worldwide 10,439 have resulted in death. That's just over 10%. So the figures we are being given already factor in unreported cases. In first world countries testing is still being done. It is only in countries where the government puts big business before it's citizens where they haven't bothered to fight back and do testing. WHO says the only way to fight this virus is testing. What is our government doing apart from sticking its head in the sand? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is undoubtedly a serious situation but let's keep some perspective in the number of deaths. We haven't been testing people for weeks now unless they are actually admitted to hospital. That means we have absolutely no idea how many are or have been infected, although they estimate its likely 20 or 30 times the reported figure. In contrast, 100% of deaths are reported so it is going to seem like a much higher death rate than is actually the case. One of the scientific experts was making just this point yesterday in the scientific briefing. The figures are skewed because we are not counting all the infections, but are counting all the deaths Actually on a CFR there are 99,509 closed cases worldwide 10,439 have resulted in death. That's just over 10%. So the figures we are being given already factor in unreported cases. In first world countries testing is still being done. It is only in countries where the government puts big business before it's citizens where they haven't bothered to fight back and do testing. WHO says the only way to fight this virus is testing. What is our government doing apart from sticking its head in the sand?" I have a thread on that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |