FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Real Doms
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference?" Real ones mums insist you call them Dominic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’ve got doms in my legs from yesterday’s leg session " Only a small amount of people will understand that - try foam rollering. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"there is no such thing as a real Dom, they rare to find and they won’t make their presence known in a thread like this" Run this by me again, there is no such thing! Okay, if that is so, the is no real Dom’s, then they couldn’t possibly make their presence on here? I got that right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? " Depends on what you think a real Dom is I would think? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference?" This is what I was going to ask | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are those that claim to be dom but use it to get a Sub carry out every sexual act they can possibly make them do with their own nenfir being the priority. There are those that are abusers. There are those that get master and slave confused with D/s. " totally agree with everything you just said x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We each want something different, so it's up to each of us to work out how we can find the partners that match our needs. Define the dom you want and seek them. " Exactly! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"there is no such thing as a real Dom, they rare to find and they won’t make their presence known in a thread like this" Yes that is true... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We each want something different, so it's up to each of us to work out how we can find the partners that match our needs. Define the dom you want and seek them. Exactly! " exactly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference?" A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think most of the genuine doms don't like the label or identifying as a dom as so many have given it a bad name. " That's partly why I was debating as to whether I should contribute to this thread or not. I removed "Dom" from my profile name long ago. I have had two subs over the years. On both occasions it developed naturally as part of a relationship and with each it was a wonderful experience. Both were subs not slaves though and it was only a part of the sexual dynamic between us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’ve got doms in my legs from yesterday’s leg session " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? Real ones mums insist you call them Dominic" I laughed at this much more than I should have | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Out of my own Intrest, what's the diffrence between a Dom and a bull, cause i feel like most men feel like a Dom is a bull. But not from what I belive. " Labels can be confining but I have worn both hats. It was actually my experience as a Dom that sparked my interest in becoming what is referred to as a Bull for cuckold couples in particular. I found that the mental aspects crossed over very nicely. If I was to define the differences the first things that pop into my mind are. A Bull is focused on meeting couples A Dom is usually focused on an individual A Bull needs to have a strong physical presence as a key component of their sexuality. With a Dom the balance is tipped more in favour of mental strength, agility emotional intelligence and empathy. To my mind the two can blur quite a lot though. There's your simple answer lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. " I've experienced a few of thoes! Where is the real BDSM community? I wanna join that way you know for sure thats the only way you will meet real Dominants & experience the hype for sure. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. I've experienced a few of thoes! Where is the real BDSM community? I wanna join that way you know for sure thats the only way you will meet real Dominants & experience the hype for sure. " I think the problem is the word "real". As this thread shows there are so many different interpretations and so many people saying there's no such thing as a real dom that it becomes confusing and excludes anyone who isn't part of the elusive BDSM community. We've found it better to tread our own path, to meet people who seem to be on a similar wave length to us and to avoid anybody who is negative about BDSM without also educating and including us. That to us is "real". Community to us means supportive and inclusive. It's rare to see those qualities when anybody asks a question about BDSM on these forums. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. I've experienced a few of thoes! Where is the real BDSM community? I wanna join that way you know for sure thats the only way you will meet real Dominants & experience the hype for sure. " The 'real' bdsm community is everywhere, like seriously everywhere. Derby, Notts, Birmingham, Stoke. Burton, Everywhere! Unfortunately even within the community you get dicks and abusers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think most of the genuine doms don't like the label or identifying as a dom as so many have given it a bad name. " Except, I don't like the idea of "genuine Dom" - it's a bit "no true scotsman". But the name carries so much baggage and too many people use it as an excuse to abuse people (and they get away with it far too often). I call myself dominant and I "own" somebody (by our definition of ownership, but possibly not others), but "Dom" makes me cringe a bit (as does a lot of the language commonly used actually). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Out of my own Intrest, what's the diffrence between a Dom and a bull, cause i feel like most men feel like a Dom is a bull. But not from what I belive. Labels can be confining but I have worn both hats. It was actually my experience as a Dom that sparked my interest in becoming what is referred to as a Bull for cuckold couples in particular. I found that the mental aspects crossed over very nicely. If I was to define the differences the first things that pop into my mind are. A Bull is focused on meeting couples A Dom is usually focused on an individual A Bull needs to have a strong physical presence as a key component of their sexuality. With a Dom the balance is tipped more in favour of mental strength, agility emotional intelligence and empathy. To my mind the two can blur quite a lot though. There's your simple answer lol" Agree with this a lot!!! Many 'doms' are out for themselves and treat the sub with no respect, no honesty, gaslight them and use things against them, turn things in them or make them feel inadequate in order to lower them, belittle them, and gain control in order to gain power to get them to satisy all of their desires without much care of thought to the mental, emotional or physical wellbeing of the sub. Which is just utterly disgusting and ultimately not rewarding for either involved in the long run. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No one size fits all. I (Mr S) have been in the fetish scene/lifestyle for 40 years now and have watched it morph over that time. The one lesson I have learned, and which has been mentioned in this thread, is that the various descriptors such as Dom and Sub very much mean different things to different people. That said, it is also true that you can group people into broad 'types, and this is probably the best one can manage when engaging in these conversations. But I have also found people in the fet scene can, on occasion, be rather precious or anorakish about correct categorisation and behaviour. This rather sucks the fun out if this sort of lifestyle, so I tend to take a liberal approach and simply say I am very kinky. You really need to understand your own inner wants and desires before being able to identify who would be a compatible 'Dom' for you. Just my two penneth." Informed and sensible advice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. I've experienced a few of thoes! Where is the real BDSM community? I wanna join that way you know for sure thats the only way you will meet real Dominants & experience the hype for sure. " Kik is a good way to access bdsm knowledge and discussion. Was in a few that were specifically for in depth discussion. Pm me for some pointers to finding them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We dont like to blow our own trumpet...just keep a low profile...to be honest a good sub is hard to find and there are many wannabees from that sector too....only after a long conversation can a true dom/sub relationship form" True dat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It depends what you are wanting , a session sub for a meet is one thing but a full time D/s girl is a huge amount of mental effort" It's a lot of effort but I don't really find it much work? I enjoy it, anyway - very rewarding (in more than the obvious ways). Guess it's like having a pet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It depends what you are wanting , a session sub for a meet is one thing but a full time D/s girl is a huge amount of mental effort It's a lot of effort but I don't really find it much work? I enjoy it, anyway - very rewarding (in more than the obvious ways). Guess it's like having a pet " Depends on the dynamics of the relationship and the type of sub. Is she a CEO by day and submits to her D to decide her clothes, food, wine, brand/thickness of eyeliner, - that can be a lot of work, just the research to start with! . Do you send regular text instructions / tasks while she’s at work ? That can be a lot of work and a sub won’t tolerate a guy who isn’t sharp and consistent in that area. Or just a session sub in the bedroom for a few hours ... the easy part There’s all types of D/s relationship , including the “pet” who drinks her milk from the bowl on the floor if she misbehaves | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends on the dynamics of the relationship and the type of sub. Is she a CEO by day and submits to her D to decide her clothes, food, wine, brand/thickness of eyeliner, - that can be a lot of work, just the research to start with! . Do you send regular text instructions / tasks while she’s at work ? That can be a lot of work and a sub won’t tolerate a guy who isn’t sharp and consistent in that area. Or just a session sub in the bedroom for a few hours ... the easy part There’s all types of D/s relationship , including the “pet” who drinks her milk from the bowl on the floor if she misbehaves " Thanks for the introduction | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Problem to me is, dominance is a verb not a noun, it’s a process, not a title. As is runner. Are you an Olympic runner, club runner or a person who is jogging to keep fit, you have the title of runner. Once you turn the verb (doing word) into a noun (you can touch it, walk round it, or put it in a wheelbarrow)! is where the problem arises. Think you might find the difference in those who use verbs, process and those who use nouns, titles. Plus I suspect a Dom never talks about their needs, the focus is on the submissive nature of the person they are with Just a last thought, some get mixed up in B/d play and D/s play. Well from my perspective." whatever side of the couple wrote that you just completely head fucked me and i loved every minute of it bravo! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Problem to me is, dominance is a verb not a noun, it’s a process, not a title. As is runner. Are you an Olympic runner, club runner or a person who is jogging to keep fit, you have the title of runner. Once you turn the verb (doing word) into a noun (you can touch it, walk round it, or put it in a wheelbarrow)! is where the problem arises. Think you might find the difference in those who use verbs, process and those who use nouns, titles. Plus I suspect a Dom never talks about their needs, the focus is on the submissive nature of the person they are with Just a last thought, some get mixed up in B/d play and D/s play. Well from my perspective." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Out of my own Intrest, what's the diffrence between a Dom and a bull, cause i feel like most men feel like a Dom is a bull. But not from what I belive. Labels can be confining but I have worn both hats. It was actually my experience as a Dom that sparked my interest in becoming what is referred to as a Bull for cuckold couples in particular. I found that the mental aspects crossed over very nicely. If I was to define the differences the first things that pop into my mind are. A Bull is focused on meeting couples A Dom is usually focused on an individual A Bull needs to have a strong physical presence as a key component of their sexuality. With a Dom the balance is tipped more in favour of mental strength, agility emotional intelligence and empathy. To my mind the two can blur quite a lot though. There's your simple answer lol Agree with this a lot!!! Many 'doms' are out for themselves and treat the sub with no respect, no honesty, gaslight them and use things against them, turn things in them or make them feel inadequate in order to lower them, belittle them, and gain control in order to gain power to get them to satisy all of their desires without much care of thought to the mental, emotional or physical wellbeing of the sub. Which is just utterly disgusting and ultimately not rewarding for either involved in the long run. " The so called dom of one of my ex's that preceded me was like that and worse. It took her several months to totally relax we me and even then his dark shadow still had an impact on her. Fortunately he is now in prison. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Out of my own Intrest, what's the diffrence between a Dom and a bull, cause i feel like most men feel like a Dom is a bull. But not from what I belive. Labels can be confining but I have worn both hats. It was actually my experience as a Dom that sparked my interest in becoming what is referred to as a Bull for cuckold couples in particular. I found that the mental aspects crossed over very nicely. If I was to define the differences the first things that pop into my mind are. A Bull is focused on meeting couples A Dom is usually focused on an individual A Bull needs to have a strong physical presence as a key component of their sexuality. With a Dom the balance is tipped more in favour of mental strength, agility emotional intelligence and empathy. To my mind the two can blur quite a lot though. There's your simple answer lol Agree with this a lot!!! Many 'doms' are out for themselves and treat the sub with no respect, no honesty, gaslight them and use things against them, turn things in them or make them feel inadequate in order to lower them, belittle them, and gain control in order to gain power to get them to satisy all of their desires without much care of thought to the mental, emotional or physical wellbeing of the sub. Which is just utterly disgusting and ultimately not rewarding for either involved in the long run. The so called dom of one of my ex's that preceded me was like that and worse. It took her several months to totally relax we me and even then his dark shadow still had an impact on her. Fortunately he is now in prison." Same here, well not the prison bit. Suspect he was exploring I suspect HIS fantasy. The lady had no experience and agreed to a scene early in the relationship, they were to just met up, no words, do the scene. He left her in tears for days. No idea around subspace, no idea around drop No idea around the psychology of bypassing the cognitive mind. The acts left her in not a very good place. Still think porn does nothing for the difference between Bondage/discipline.....Dominated/submissive... Sadistic/masochistic. Helps if you don’t mix each process under one heading. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Same here, well not the prison bit. Suspect he was exploring I suspect HIS fantasy. The lady had no experience and agreed to a scene early in the relationship, they were to just met up, no words, do the scene. He left her in tears for days. No idea around subspace, no idea around drop No idea around the psychology of bypassing the cognitive mind. The acts left her in not a very good place. Still think porn does nothing for the difference between Bondage/discipline.....Dominated/submissive... Sadistic/masochistic. Helps if you don’t mix each process under one heading." So sorry to hear that. I hope your friend is now ok. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Same here, well not the prison bit. Suspect he was exploring I suspect HIS fantasy. The lady had no experience and agreed to a scene early in the relationship, they were to just met up, no words, do the scene. He left her in tears for days. No idea around subspace, no idea around drop No idea around the psychology of bypassing the cognitive mind. The acts left her in not a very good place. Still think porn does nothing for the difference between Bondage/discipline.....Dominated/submissive... Sadistic/masochistic. Helps if you don’t mix each process under one heading. So sorry to hear that. I hope your friend is now ok." She cognitively understands, which I believe has allowed her to move on. Thank you for you concern. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What’s ‘real’ is in the eye of the beholder really, isn’t it. As in all things, Doms come in many different types. The trick is for Dom and sub to be compatible in their desires and their commitment to whatever dynamic they choose to share and enjoy. I’m a real Dom to the ladies I have been lucky enough to be master to. Finding that shared imagination lust and respect is an amazing thing to enjoy." 100% | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What’s ‘real’ is in the eye of the beholder really, isn’t it. As in all things, Doms come in many different types. The trick is for Dom and sub to be compatible in their desires and their commitment to whatever dynamic they choose to share and enjoy. I’m a real Dom to the ladies I have been lucky enough to be master to. Finding that shared imagination lust and respect is an amazing thing to enjoy." Very hard to find though and even harder when people portray themselves a certain way but are actually not who they claim to be or behave like they say they do. Trust is key and without that nothing will work. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What’s ‘real’ is in the eye of the beholder really, isn’t it. As in all things, Doms come in many different types. The trick is for Dom and sub to be compatible in their desires and their commitment to whatever dynamic they choose to share and enjoy. I’m a real Dom to the ladies I have been lucky enough to be master to. Finding that shared imagination lust and respect is an amazing thing to enjoy. Very hard to find though and even harder when people portray themselves a certain way but are actually not who they claim to be or behave like they say they do. Trust is key and without that nothing will work. " It really isn’t easy to find, is it. But then, the fact that it is so hard to find in part contributes to the intimacy and intensity of the scenario when you do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? " I was sent this tonight by a fellow fabber which is a beautiful analogy If dominance is an act of setting someone free, and submission is an act of willfully devoting oneself to another, then who is the captor and who's is the captive? A leash after all has two ends, both of which must be held. Ultimately, dominant and submissive are bound to one another not by chains but by their own needs. We do for one another what no one else can or will. We are here by choice and by choice we stay.xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No one size fits all. I (Mr S) have been in the fetish scene/lifestyle for 40 years now and have watched it morph over that time. The one lesson I have learned, and which has been mentioned in this thread, is that the various descriptors such as Dom and Sub very much mean different things to different people. That said, it is also true that you can group people into broad 'types, and this is probably the best one can manage when engaging in these conversations. But I have also found people in the fet scene can, on occasion, be rather precious or anorakish about correct categorisation and behaviour. This rather sucks the fun out if this sort of lifestyle, so I tend to take a liberal approach and simply say I am very kinky. You really need to understand your own inner wants and desires before being able to identify who would be a compatible 'Dom' for you. Just my two penneth." Very much this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? " Is not the real question, what am I looking for and who can forfill these requirements for me? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? I was sent this tonight by a fellow fabber which is a beautiful analogy If dominance is an act of setting someone free, and submission is an act of willfully devoting oneself to another, then who is the captor and who's is the captive? A leash after all has two ends, both of which must be held. Ultimately, dominant and submissive are bound to one another not by chains but by their own needs. We do for one another what no one else can or will. We are here by choice and by choice we stay.xx" I have this on my profile and ask for thoughts on it as a way of giving someone a starting point in a message to me. Works really well and I get a few like minded people come through. Also attracts the wrong ones but it is easy to le them out. I also love how this worded. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? Is not the real question, what am I looking for and who can forfill these requirements for me? " Definitely! The real Dom is the one THEY are looking for. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are a few Doms\Dommes on this site but unfortunately there are many wannabes and people who think they can do 50 shades. Bdsm takes time to learn and there are many aspects from sensual to extreme. Your best bet is to pop along to a munch ( bdsm social meet) where you can chat with like minded people. As OP is based in Windsor you would have Reading, Guildford (which I co run), Woking and Farnbrough. This way your be able to ask many questions on things you would like to try or know about and not have the mistake of someone who doesn’t know what he or she is doing. " I'm interested in these | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Your best bet is to pop along to a munch ( bdsm social meet) where you can chat with like minded people. " In my experience you still get a lot of abusive people masquerading as doms even on the BDSM scene (in fact I think it's worse) and in some places it isn't challenged really at all. That said, I've met Ruber in a previous life/profile and any munch he recommends will be legit | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’ve got doms in my legs from yesterday’s leg session Only a small amount of people will understand that - try foam rollering." A good soak in magnesium salts or Epsom salts in the bath also helps | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are those that claim to be dom but use it to get a Sub carry out every sexual act they can possibly make them do with their own nenfir being the priority. There are those that are abusers. There are those that get master and slave confused with D/s. " Oh indeed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are a few Doms\Dommes on this site but unfortunately there are many wannabes and people who think they can do 50 shades. Bdsm takes time to learn and there are many aspects from sensual to extreme. Your best bet is to pop along to a munch ( bdsm social meet) where you can chat with like minded people. As OP is based in Windsor you would have Reading, Guildford (which I co run), Woking and Farnbrough. This way your be able to ask many questions on things you would like to try or know about and not have the mistake of someone who doesn’t know what he or she is doing. I'm interested in these " Sent Pm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Your best bet is to pop along to a munch ( bdsm social meet) where you can chat with like minded people. In my experience you still get a lot of abusive people masquerading as doms even on the BDSM scene (in fact I think it's worse) and in some places it isn't challenged really at all. That said, I've met Ruber in a previous life/profile and any munch he recommends will be legit " your most welcome and thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? " My boy friend is a real dom and good at it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are those that claim to be dom but use it to get a Sub carry out every sexual act they can possibly make them do with their own nenfir being the priority. There are those that are abusers. There are those that get master and slave confused with D/s. " never a more true story | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? " *there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Your best bet is to pop along to a munch ( bdsm social meet) where you can chat with like minded people. In my experience you still get a lot of abusive people masquerading as doms even on the BDSM scene (in fact I think it's worse) and in some places it isn't challenged really at all. That said, I've met Ruber in a previous life/profile and any munch he recommends will be legit " I found the same. Thought munches would be really friendly, inclusive, but was mostly funny lil fellas in leather kilts n DMs boring me about why I wasn't Dom, because I have sex with subfems and because I treat subs like humans first and like them to have a voice and because of how I dressed as I didn't come in 'Dom uniform'...they were 'social' events. I went to several munches and bdsm events and all were weirdly competitive, slightly dreary cock offs tbh. I found, chatted to, met and learned about impact, breathplay, knife play, restraint and torture from legit, experienced Doms inclusive, Doms & subs via other more specialist websites and publications. Ive found a few approachable Doms here, but most are just tedious, narcissistic sociopaths tbh. My advice is to try the main sites/mags for the fetish you're into...eg DDlg is a very different dynamic to Master/slave etc. There are few shortcuts, just put some effort in, find people who share your kinks and network with them. A Real Dom or sub is just whoever you fully bond with, it's as varied as people are, ccoz they're all people bbefore D/s. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. This " That just seems a silly statement to me...why wouldn't an experienced Dom or sub even engage in an enlightening convo and show the difference between a safe, experienced lifestyle/session Dom and a dangerous fake? D/s world can be so drearily up itself sometimes...yawn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. This That just seems a silly statement to me...why wouldn't an experienced Dom or sub even engage in an enlightening convo and show the difference between a safe, experienced lifestyle/session Dom and a dangerous fake? D/s world can be so drearily up itself sometimes...yawn. " Totally agree with that last statement. Meet so many so called lifestyle Doms that really aren’t, not even close, and Subs who are just vulnerable, high maintenance waiting to to be taken advantage of. For me I never even considered I was a “Dom” until someone told me I was a natural Dom and then looked into it and found this whole new world, and realised I’d always had D/s type relationships and been attracted to certain types of women. The session D/s then really took off as an added extra | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. This That just seems a silly statement to me...why wouldn't an experienced Dom or sub even engage in an enlightening convo and show the difference between a safe, experienced lifestyle/session Dom and a dangerous fake? D/s world can be so drearily up itself sometimes...yawn. Totally agree with that last statement. Meet so many so called lifestyle Doms that really aren’t, not even close, and Subs who are just vulnerable, high maintenance waiting to to be taken advantage of. For me I never even considered I was a “Dom” until someone told me I was a natural Dom and then looked into it and found this whole new world, and realised I’d always had D/s type relationships and been attracted to certain types of women. The session D/s then really took off as an added extra " 100% this, there is a complete difference between trusting someone entirely with your sexuality and submissive side and just taking advantage of someone. Someone can be dominant in a pleasing, mutual, sexy, teasing, overpowering way without having to be Mr Grey 2.0. Dominant is also incredibly subjective but hey ho | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Exactly, you can be Dominant without BDSM, and even non sexual. You can enjoy perfectly choosing her meal, wine and even outfit when you go out & the effect of it especially when she’s had a very stressful day at work. Of course if you mess that up , what right do you have to dominate her body ? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"she loved being tied tight while I had my fun." You ran back upstairs and watched MOTD yeah? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Exactly, you can be Dominant without BDSM, and even non sexual. You can enjoy perfectly choosing her meal, wine and even outfit when you go out & the effect of it especially when she’s had a very stressful day at work. Of course if you mess that up , what right do you have to dominate her body ? " The fact that they don't badge it as BDSM, does not stop it from falling into the D/S of BDSM remembering that BDSM stands for B&D, B/D, or BD Bondage and discipline D&s, D/s, or Ds Dominance and submission S&M, S/M, or SM Sadism and masochism I know there are couples out there into Service, Gorean and 1950's wife (to name a few), that are forms of D/S without the BD or SM. People can be kinky without knowing they are being kinky. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone " The last paragraph - could simply be a sadistic Dom. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone The last paragraph - could simply be a sadistic Dom. " Agree, more on the S/m side. Think I have said this before, dominating is a verb not a noun, everyone does it differently, find someone who dances the same steps as you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. " What a stupid comment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone The last paragraph - could simply be a sadistic Dom. Agree, more on the S/m side. Think I have said this before, dominating is a verb not a noun, everyone does it differently, find someone who dances the same steps as you." Sadistic Dom still isn't one in control. Sadists and masochists it's still the masochist in control of what they receive. Basically anyone who does anything the other person doesn't want it's abuse!! Plain and simple. Don't go labeling abusers as sadists If a masochist wants torment but wants it to end the sadist will stop. Fake doms are abusers thats it plain and simple. Dominants are not the ones in control ever they are providers of what the sub/slave etc wants they trust you as the dominant with their desires so no matter whether if you are a master, Dom or sadist or every other dominant role. Fake doms don't give a shit about a person's boundaries, they don't give a shit about aftercare and they certainly don't give a shit about a bond. Dont confuse the abusers with being dominant roles. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone The last paragraph - could simply be a sadistic Dom. Agree, more on the S/m side. Think I have said this before, dominating is a verb not a noun, everyone does it differently, find someone who dances the same steps as you. Sadistic Dom still isn't one in control. Sadists and masochists it's still the masochist in control of what they receive. Basically anyone who does anything the other person doesn't want it's abuse!! Plain and simple. Don't go labeling abusers as sadists If a masochist wants torment but wants it to end the sadist will stop. Fake doms are abusers thats it plain and simple. Dominants are not the ones in control ever they are providers of what the sub/slave etc wants they trust you as the dominant with their desires so no matter whether if you are a master, Dom or sadist or every other dominant role. Fake doms don't give a shit about a person's boundaries, they don't give a shit about aftercare and they certainly don't give a shit about a bond. Dont confuse the abusers with being dominant roles." Do not attempt to tell me that I am confusing x with y! I simply gave an alternative perspective. I mentioned nothing about consent or lack of. There are different types of consent, including consensual non-consent and contracts. Yes abuse exists. Yes manipulation exists. These exist outside of kink as well as within. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone The last paragraph - could simply be a sadistic Dom. Agree, more on the S/m side. Think I have said this before, dominating is a verb not a noun, everyone does it differently, find someone who dances the same steps as you. Sadistic Dom still isn't one in control. Sadists and masochists it's still the masochist in control of what they receive. Basically anyone who does anything the other person doesn't want it's abuse!! Plain and simple. Don't go labeling abusers as sadists If a masochist wants torment but wants it to end the sadist will stop. Fake doms are abusers thats it plain and simple. Dominants are not the ones in control ever they are providers of what the sub/slave etc wants they trust you as the dominant with their desires so no matter whether if you are a master, Dom or sadist or every other dominant role. Fake doms don't give a shit about a person's boundaries, they don't give a shit about aftercare and they certainly don't give a shit about a bond. Dont confuse the abusers with being dominant roles. Do not attempt to tell me that I am confusing x with y! I simply gave an alternative perspective. I mentioned nothing about consent or lack of. There are different types of consent, including consensual non-consent and contracts. Yes abuse exists. Yes manipulation exists. These exist outside of kink as well as within. " Consent non consent requires a person to know your boundaries and trust Myself I'd only agree to dominate with contracts protects myself as well as themselves should any point a boundary is crossed and very well shouldn't have done. Protects me from being arrested for something that was requested of me. I know full well there are abusers outside of the world of kink but some many fake wannabe doms think they can get away with what is actual abuse. Sadly in the world of liberated sexuality they do more often than not because it's a he said she said they said. I never said you were confused I said don't confuse. Don't give people an excuse to coin the term and people new to the scene a false impression of what to expect. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone The last paragraph - could simply be a sadistic Dom. Agree, more on the S/m side. Think I have said this before, dominating is a verb not a noun, everyone does it differently, find someone who dances the same steps as you. Sadistic Dom still isn't one in control. Sadists and masochists it's still the masochist in control of what they receive. Basically anyone who does anything the other person doesn't want it's abuse!! Plain and simple. Don't go labeling abusers as sadists If a masochist wants torment but wants it to end the sadist will stop. Fake doms are abusers thats it plain and simple. Dominants are not the ones in control ever they are providers of what the sub/slave etc wants they trust you as the dominant with their desires so no matter whether if you are a master, Dom or sadist or every other dominant role. Fake doms don't give a shit about a person's boundaries, they don't give a shit about aftercare and they certainly don't give a shit about a bond. Dont confuse the abusers with being dominant roles." I never label anyone, I hate the verb “to be” It automatically sticks people in boxes. It is the most used verb on this site, including this thread. Dominating us an action, not a title, talk to people who love to be submissive, never a “Dom” Anyway, my name isn’t Domenic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone The last paragraph - could simply be a sadistic Dom. Agree, more on the S/m side. Think I have said this before, dominating is a verb not a noun, everyone does it differently, find someone who dances the same steps as you. Sadistic Dom still isn't one in control. Sadists and masochists it's still the masochist in control of what they receive. Basically anyone who does anything the other person doesn't want it's abuse!! Plain and simple. Don't go labeling abusers as sadists If a masochist wants torment but wants it to end the sadist will stop. Fake doms are abusers thats it plain and simple. Dominants are not the ones in control ever they are providers of what the sub/slave etc wants they trust you as the dominant with their desires so no matter whether if you are a master, Dom or sadist or every other dominant role. Fake doms don't give a shit about a person's boundaries, they don't give a shit about aftercare and they certainly don't give a shit about a bond. Dont confuse the abusers with being dominant roles. I never label anyone, I hate the verb “to be” It automatically sticks people in boxes. It is the most used verb on this site, including this thread. Dominating us an action, not a title, talk to people who love to be submissive, never a “Dom” Anyway, my name isn’t Domenic " Dom and Domme is terms for male and female dominant, domination is an action in which they perform, to dominate or to subjugate Just as sub is terms for submissive, a subservient People will give themselves the titles just as a sub would decide theirs. You choose not to use the title of Dom or Domme doesn't make them any less of a title in the BDSM world | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone The last paragraph - could simply be a sadistic Dom. Agree, more on the S/m side. Think I have said this before, dominating is a verb not a noun, everyone does it differently, find someone who dances the same steps as you. Sadistic Dom still isn't one in control. Sadists and masochists it's still the masochist in control of what they receive. Basically anyone who does anything the other person doesn't want it's abuse!! Plain and simple. Don't go labeling abusers as sadists If a masochist wants torment but wants it to end the sadist will stop. Fake doms are abusers thats it plain and simple. Dominants are not the ones in control ever they are providers of what the sub/slave etc wants they trust you as the dominant with their desires so no matter whether if you are a master, Dom or sadist or every other dominant role. Fake doms don't give a shit about a person's boundaries, they don't give a shit about aftercare and they certainly don't give a shit about a bond. Dont confuse the abusers with being dominant roles." With respect I disagree, obviously you are entitled to your view, but here are the reasons why I disagree. It is a common statement that masochists or subs are in control because they can decide what happens to their bodies. This is not strictly true for three reasons. Firstly any person in any relationship can decide what happens to their bodies. It is a human right and, to use an absurd example, the reason why parents cannot use corporal punishment. You cannot say the child is in control of the relationship because the child can prevent their parents applying physical force to them. Control in a relationship is not one aspect, it is made of a number of aspects. The second point is that the dom can choose not to do something to the sub, or even end the scene early against the sub wishes. A dom cannot be controlled to do something that dom does not want to do, as an example comply with a request for needle play if it is not the dom's interest. Many dom's don't do rope so the submissive get their rope fix elsewhere. Thirdly, people tend to forget that even with sadistic doms there is a transaction of mutual benefit it is not one sided and sub may want and desire what the dom can give. There is an old joke where the masochist says "beat me, beat me" and the sadist says with a smile "No". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think most of the genuine doms don't like the label or identifying as a dom as so many have given it a bad name. " Absolutely true. Why be a label when you can be yourself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just have sex It's a lot less complicated " Because fucking with mind, body and soul is far more fun than sex. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is a real dom, and what is a fake dom? And how would one tell the difference? A real dom takes charge, he/she dominates but his/her focus is the good of his/her sub. To satisfy her/his desire to serve and be subdued and help her/him grow. A fake dom absuses the power dynamic to benefit himself/herself. Quite easy to tell apart once you get to know someone The last paragraph - could simply be a sadistic Dom. Agree, more on the S/m side. Think I have said this before, dominating is a verb not a noun, everyone does it differently, find someone who dances the same steps as you. Sadistic Dom still isn't one in control. Sadists and masochists it's still the masochist in control of what they receive. Basically anyone who does anything the other person doesn't want it's abuse!! Plain and simple. Don't go labeling abusers as sadists If a masochist wants torment but wants it to end the sadist will stop. Fake doms are abusers thats it plain and simple. Dominants are not the ones in control ever they are providers of what the sub/slave etc wants they trust you as the dominant with their desires so no matter whether if you are a master, Dom or sadist or every other dominant role. Fake doms don't give a shit about a person's boundaries, they don't give a shit about aftercare and they certainly don't give a shit about a bond. Dont confuse the abusers with being dominant roles. With respect I disagree, obviously you are entitled to your view, but here are the reasons why I disagree. It is a common statement that masochists or subs are in control because they can decide what happens to their bodies. This is not strictly true for three reasons. Firstly any person in any relationship can decide what happens to their bodies. It is a human right and, to use an absurd example, the reason why parents cannot use corporal punishment. You cannot say the child is in control of the relationship because the child can prevent their parents applying physical force to them. Control in a relationship is not one aspect, it is made of a number of aspects. The second point is that the dom can choose not to do something to the sub, or even end the scene early against the sub wishes. A dom cannot be controlled to do something that dom does not want to do, as an example comply with a request for needle play if it is not the dom's interest. Many dom's don't do rope so the submissive get their rope fix elsewhere. Thirdly, people tend to forget that even with sadistic doms there is a transaction of mutual benefit it is not one sided and sub may want and desire what the dom can give. There is an old joke where the masochist says "beat me, beat me" and the sadist says with a smile "No"." Well we have been talking context of what happens in D/s relations differences between a real dominant and a fake Dom aka abuser Please feel free to re-read my comments. There is boundaries for both the dominant and submissive regardless of what kind of dynamic play it is. A real sadist will give the masochist what they desire I never stated it's one sided in the slightest. If the masochist wants torment i.e. being scared and reduced to tears and feeling terrified. If the masochist wants it to stop the sadist will stop they won't carry on this is the control the submissive has. But these fake wannabes will do what ever they want disregarding boundaries. A real dominant and submissive relationship will always be mutually beneficial requires being equally matched in what both want. Someone who enjoys impact play the most won't be with someone who can't or won't do impact play whether it's receiving or giving. What point would it be if either party didn't match? How many submissive can say they've been subjected to one of these abusive people? Forced to endure an attack that was unwanted I've known many who have endured brutal attacks because the Dom wanted to. I will never do anything out of my boundaries and I would never take anyone out of theirs. But there are sick abusive individuals who don't adhere to the rules and rights of a human being. The submissive remains in control of what you do to them they hand themselves over to you and you have a responsibility to make sure their desires and needs are met and they are safe. They use their safe word it is over they have the control and should only be the one with that control to stop what is being done to them. If a submissive wanted to be tied to the bed and flogged but I go further and start to cut them and they want to stop and I ignore them what is that?? It's abuse it's assault. I won't be compelled to go out of my boundaries as a dominant as you say the submissive will seek elsewhere for what they desire. Boundaries mean nothing to fake doms | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You say tomato I say tomato. There are no rights or wrongs, all there is is what is right for those concerned at the point in time they are together. Tomorrow is another day and on that day the rules may or may not change... " No rights no wrongs? Then you clearly haven't met anyone whose been with a fake dom then or experienced it for yourself. Leaves lasting scars mentally and physically, that tomato will turn rotten when it does happen. No and stop and what ever safe word that's used is meant to mean just that When you're left with scars and wounds to heal you never wanted think about your words. At the very least compassion and imagination should help you to understand. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You say tomato I say tomato. There are no rights or wrongs, all there is is what is right for those concerned at the point in time they are together. Tomorrow is another day and on that day the rules may or may not change... No rights no wrongs? Then you clearly haven't met anyone whose been with a fake dom then or experienced it for yourself. Leaves lasting scars mentally and physically, that tomato will turn rotten when it does happen. No and stop and what ever safe word that's used is meant to mean just that When you're left with scars and wounds to heal you never wanted think about your words. At the very least compassion and imagination should help you to understand. " No offense but you completely miss my point. I wasn't talking about "fake" or "real". My point is this, what is right for one is wrong for someone else. I once knew a submissive who got off on the fact she knew she was being abused by someone who didn't know what they where doing. To judge everyone by the same standard fly's in the face of BDSM and all it entails. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You say tomato I say tomato. There are no rights or wrongs, all there is is what is right for those concerned at the point in time they are together. Tomorrow is another day and on that day the rules may or may not change... No rights no wrongs? Then you clearly haven't met anyone whose been with a fake dom then or experienced it for yourself. Leaves lasting scars mentally and physically, that tomato will turn rotten when it does happen. No and stop and what ever safe word that's used is meant to mean just that When you're left with scars and wounds to heal you never wanted think about your words. At the very least compassion and imagination should help you to understand. No offense but you completely miss my point. I wasn't talking about "fake" or "real". My point is this, what is right for one is wrong for someone else. I once knew a submissive who got off on the fact she knew she was being abused by someone who didn't know what they where doing. To judge everyone by the same standard fly's in the face of BDSM and all it entails. " The topic of the thread isn't about what someone likes desires or enjoys but real doms vs fake. No one saying what someone desires is wrong. It's saying that going against a person's wishes and boundaries is wrong. Which is very much what fake doms do and the fact fab and every other site is full of the fakes and finding a real dom is difficult. No one is judging a person's desires here no one is judging what anyone wants as long as it's mutually consensual (consent non consent is based on trust and other person knowing boundaries no one in their right mind would go cnc with a complete stranger) If it's illegal and harms someone in a way in which they did not want then who does so should be judged and hopefully receive justice but that is a rarity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You say tomato I say tomato. There are no rights or wrongs, all there is is what is right for those concerned at the point in time they are together. Tomorrow is another day and on that day the rules may or may not change... No rights no wrongs? Then you clearly haven't met anyone whose been with a fake dom then or experienced it for yourself. Leaves lasting scars mentally and physically, that tomato will turn rotten when it does happen. No and stop and what ever safe word that's used is meant to mean just that When you're left with scars and wounds to heal you never wanted think about your words. At the very least compassion and imagination should help you to understand. No offense but you completely miss my point. I wasn't talking about "fake" or "real". My point is this, what is right for one is wrong for someone else. I once knew a submissive who got off on the fact she knew she was being abused by someone who didn't know what they where doing. To judge everyone by the same standard fly's in the face of BDSM and all it entails. The topic of the thread isn't about what someone likes desires or enjoys but real doms vs fake. No one saying what someone desires is wrong. It's saying that going against a person's wishes and boundaries is wrong. Which is very much what fake doms do and the fact fab and every other site is full of the fakes and finding a real dom is difficult. No one is judging a person's desires here no one is judging what anyone wants as long as it's mutually consensual (consent non consent is based on trust and other person knowing boundaries no one in their right mind would go cnc with a complete stranger) If it's illegal and harms someone in a way in which they did not want then who does so should be judged and hopefully receive justice but that is a rarity. " You seem very angry and I sincerely hope you get passed it in time and feel better. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You say tomato I say tomato. There are no rights or wrongs, all there is is what is right for those concerned at the point in time they are together. Tomorrow is another day and on that day the rules may or may not change... No rights no wrongs? Then you clearly haven't met anyone whose been with a fake dom then or experienced it for yourself. Leaves lasting scars mentally and physically, that tomato will turn rotten when it does happen. No and stop and what ever safe word that's used is meant to mean just that When you're left with scars and wounds to heal you never wanted think about your words. At the very least compassion and imagination should help you to understand. No offense but you completely miss my point. I wasn't talking about "fake" or "real". My point is this, what is right for one is wrong for someone else. I once knew a submissive who got off on the fact she knew she was being abused by someone who didn't know what they where doing. To judge everyone by the same standard fly's in the face of BDSM and all it entails. The topic of the thread isn't about what someone likes desires or enjoys but real doms vs fake. No one saying what someone desires is wrong. It's saying that going against a person's wishes and boundaries is wrong. Which is very much what fake doms do and the fact fab and every other site is full of the fakes and finding a real dom is difficult. No one is judging a person's desires here no one is judging what anyone wants as long as it's mutually consensual (consent non consent is based on trust and other person knowing boundaries no one in their right mind would go cnc with a complete stranger) If it's illegal and harms someone in a way in which they did not want then who does so should be judged and hopefully receive justice but that is a rarity. You seem very angry and I sincerely hope you get passed it in time and feel better." I'm sorry you think so. I don't know where you see the anger. My compassion for another's safety offends you so I assume you're having difficulty understanding that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You say tomato I say tomato. There are no rights or wrongs, all there is is what is right for those concerned at the point in time they are together. Tomorrow is another day and on that day the rules may or may not change... No rights no wrongs? Then you clearly haven't met anyone whose been with a fake dom then or experienced it for yourself. Leaves lasting scars mentally and physically, that tomato will turn rotten when it does happen. No and stop and what ever safe word that's used is meant to mean just that When you're left with scars and wounds to heal you never wanted think about your words. At the very least compassion and imagination should help you to understand. No offense but you completely miss my point. I wasn't talking about "fake" or "real". My point is this, what is right for one is wrong for someone else. I once knew a submissive who got off on the fact she knew she was being abused by someone who didn't know what they where doing. To judge everyone by the same standard fly's in the face of BDSM and all it entails. The topic of the thread isn't about what someone likes desires or enjoys but real doms vs fake. No one saying what someone desires is wrong. It's saying that going against a person's wishes and boundaries is wrong. Which is very much what fake doms do and the fact fab and every other site is full of the fakes and finding a real dom is difficult. No one is judging a person's desires here no one is judging what anyone wants as long as it's mutually consensual (consent non consent is based on trust and other person knowing boundaries no one in their right mind would go cnc with a complete stranger) If it's illegal and harms someone in a way in which they did not want then who does so should be judged and hopefully receive justice but that is a rarity. You seem very angry and I sincerely hope you get passed it in time and feel better. I'm sorry you think so. I don't know where you see the anger. My compassion for another's safety offends you so I assume you're having difficulty understanding that " It's just how you come across to me.. if I'm wrong then I'm wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You say tomato I say tomato. There are no rights or wrongs, all there is is what is right for those concerned at the point in time they are together. Tomorrow is another day and on that day the rules may or may not change... No rights no wrongs? Then you clearly haven't met anyone whose been with a fake dom then or experienced it for yourself. Leaves lasting scars mentally and physically, that tomato will turn rotten when it does happen. No and stop and what ever safe word that's used is meant to mean just that When you're left with scars and wounds to heal you never wanted think about your words. At the very least compassion and imagination should help you to understand. No offense but you completely miss my point. I wasn't talking about "fake" or "real". My point is this, what is right for one is wrong for someone else. I once knew a submissive who got off on the fact she knew she was being abused by someone who didn't know what they where doing. To judge everyone by the same standard fly's in the face of BDSM and all it entails. The topic of the thread isn't about what someone likes desires or enjoys but real doms vs fake. No one saying what someone desires is wrong. It's saying that going against a person's wishes and boundaries is wrong. Which is very much what fake doms do and the fact fab and every other site is full of the fakes and finding a real dom is difficult. No one is judging a person's desires here no one is judging what anyone wants as long as it's mutually consensual (consent non consent is based on trust and other person knowing boundaries no one in their right mind would go cnc with a complete stranger) If it's illegal and harms someone in a way in which they did not want then who does so should be judged and hopefully receive justice but that is a rarity. You seem very angry and I sincerely hope you get passed it in time and feel better. I'm sorry you think so. I don't know where you see the anger. My compassion for another's safety offends you so I assume you're having difficulty understanding that It's just how you come across to me.. if I'm wrong then I'm wrong. " Maybe I should use emojis prolifically to express my emotional state because my use of the English language seems aggressive to you. I can't do much text speak I'm afraid to make it seem more affectionate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You say tomato I say tomato. There are no rights or wrongs, all there is is what is right for those concerned at the point in time they are together. Tomorrow is another day and on that day the rules may or may not change... No rights no wrongs? Then you clearly haven't met anyone whose been with a fake dom then or experienced it for yourself. Leaves lasting scars mentally and physically, that tomato will turn rotten when it does happen. No and stop and what ever safe word that's used is meant to mean just that When you're left with scars and wounds to heal you never wanted think about your words. At the very least compassion and imagination should help you to understand. No offense but you completely miss my point. I wasn't talking about "fake" or "real". My point is this, what is right for one is wrong for someone else. I once knew a submissive who got off on the fact she knew she was being abused by someone who didn't know what they where doing. To judge everyone by the same standard fly's in the face of BDSM and all it entails. The topic of the thread isn't about what someone likes desires or enjoys but real doms vs fake. No one saying what someone desires is wrong. It's saying that going against a person's wishes and boundaries is wrong. Which is very much what fake doms do and the fact fab and every other site is full of the fakes and finding a real dom is difficult. No one is judging a person's desires here no one is judging what anyone wants as long as it's mutually consensual (consent non consent is based on trust and other person knowing boundaries no one in their right mind would go cnc with a complete stranger) If it's illegal and harms someone in a way in which they did not want then who does so should be judged and hopefully receive justice but that is a rarity. You seem very angry and I sincerely hope you get passed it in time and feel better. I'm sorry you think so. I don't know where you see the anger. My compassion for another's safety offends you so I assume you're having difficulty understanding that It's just how you come across to me.. if I'm wrong then I'm wrong. Maybe I should use emojis prolifically to express my emotional state because my use of the English language seems aggressive to you. I can't do much text speak I'm afraid to make it seem more affectionate " This is the problem with emotive subjects such as this, tone is easily misjudged but between us we cleared up the misunderstanding. I'm off home to bed to give my little a cuddle. Night x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. What a stupid comment " Was it?? Or was it deliberately done to spark a conversation?? It's amazing how much stick I've got over this. But it was a deliberate conversation starter as the poster used the term 'real' dom. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am glad the heat has been taken out of this discussion. However I think it is a modern problem that in trying to have a discussion about an issue, people claim they have the sole right to talk on behalf of victims and to do so in a heated manner, and to claim their view is the only right view. Some of us have friends who have been subject to consent violations and abhor what certain people do to others,and are passionate about education and discussion. It still does not mean that being heated about a matter makes a person right. My own view is that using terms such as false and real is not helpful on two levels. On the first level as people have already mentioned that whether doms or subs are considered fake or real can merely be an issue of compatibility. The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. " Finally someone talking some some sense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am glad the heat has been taken out of this discussion. However I think it is a modern problem that in trying to have a discussion about an issue, people claim they have the sole right to talk on behalf of victims and to do so in a heated manner, and to claim their view is the only right view. Some of us have friends who have been subject to consent violations and abhor what certain people do to others,and are passionate about education and discussion. It still does not mean that being heated about a matter makes a person right. My own view is that using terms such as false and real is not helpful on two levels. On the first level as people have already mentioned that whether doms or subs are considered fake or real can merely be an issue of compatibility. The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. " As Falcon says it's a interaction between the dom and the sub and everything should be agreed beforehand the submissive is agreeable to all the stuff she wants dom to do and she can handle, The Dom does not need to show his hand , He more then likely has a few subjects that appreciate his confidence control and his discretion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? " Yeah, me, I've got the deep voice, I hand abuse out freely, I have plenty of cleaning for you to do, and I even wear the black batman cape! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? Yeah, me, I've got the deep voice, I hand abuse out freely, I have plenty of cleaning for you to do, and I even wear the black batman cape! " You’re not a true Dom until you have a black Spider-Man outfit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? Yeah, me, I've got the deep voice, I hand abuse out freely, I have plenty of cleaning for you to do, and I even wear the black batman cape! " If your wearing a mask ?? my garden needs done ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? Yeah, me, I've got the deep voice, I hand abuse out freely, I have plenty of cleaning for you to do, and I even wear the black batman cape! You’re not a true Dom until you have a black Spider-Man outfit." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? Yeah, me, I've got the deep voice, I hand abuse out freely, I have plenty of cleaning for you to do, and I even wear the black batman cape! You’re not a true Dom until you have a black Spider-Man outfit. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. " These people use the title of Dom this is what is being pointed out. Those who know what the roles of a dominant entails know they aren't Doms hence fake doms they have no intention of understanding what it is to be a Dom. Abusers using the guise of being dominant whos main target group are new to the scene and wishing to try being a sub. Fake - not the real thing, imitation So expressing as there is no such thing as a fake dom I'd beg to differ on that Wolf who wears sheep's clothing says he's a sheep doesnt make him a sheep he's still going to eat that flock makes the Wolf a fake sheep an imposter, an imitation A fake dom is an abuser masquerading in order get what they want. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are their any out their ? Yeah, me, I've got the deep voice, I hand abuse out freely, I have plenty of cleaning for you to do, and I even wear the black batman cape! If your wearing a mask ?? my garden needs done ? " Ok, I'm contracting my dommness out for a fee. I have an empty slot early next week. I'll get 4 naked women on the job, I'll get them to beg, and suck dick for the tools. They'll also work naked and in a lead. Can probably do it for 209 quid or so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. These people use the title of Dom this is what is being pointed out. Those who know what the roles of a dominant entails know they aren't Doms hence fake doms they have no intention of understanding what it is to be a Dom. Abusers using the guise of being dominant whos main target group are new to the scene and wishing to try being a sub. Fake - not the real thing, imitation So expressing as there is no such thing as a fake dom I'd beg to differ on that Wolf who wears sheep's clothing says he's a sheep doesnt make him a sheep he's still going to eat that flock makes the Wolf a fake sheep an imposter, an imitation A fake dom is an abuser masquerading in order get what they want. " Could that beg the question, a fake sub is a pillow princess who hasn’t got what she wanted? There is no need for abuse in either the fet or vanilla world. It happens, unfortunately I suspect porn labels D/s in a bad light. B/d is great fun on a light note. D/s relationships are stunning. S/m has amused me. If it’s not fun, don’t do it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. These people use the title of Dom this is what is being pointed out. Those who know what the roles of a dominant entails know they aren't Doms hence fake doms they have no intention of understanding what it is to be a Dom. Abusers using the guise of being dominant whos main target group are new to the scene and wishing to try being a sub. Fake - not the real thing, imitation So expressing as there is no such thing as a fake dom I'd beg to differ on that Wolf who wears sheep's clothing says he's a sheep doesnt make him a sheep he's still going to eat that flock makes the Wolf a fake sheep an imposter, an imitation A fake dom is an abuser masquerading in order get what they want. Could that beg the question, a fake sub is a pillow princess who hasn’t got what she wanted? There is no need for abuse in either the fet or vanilla world. It happens, unfortunately I suspect porn labels D/s in a bad light. B/d is great fun on a light note. D/s relationships are stunning. S/m has amused me. If it’s not fun, don’t do it. " The discussion is validity of what a real vs fake dom is. But feel free to add since you pointed out earlier questioning another about there being no real Doms Let's understands the risks of a fake sub. What is a fake sub? How can one be described as real or fake sub? What harm does a fake sub bring to the community? What if it's a fake switch? Please carry on let's discuss this, you clearly express an interest | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. These people use the title of Dom this is what is being pointed out. Those who know what the roles of a dominant entails know they aren't Doms hence fake doms they have no intention of understanding what it is to be a Dom. Abusers using the guise of being dominant whos main target group are new to the scene and wishing to try being a sub. Fake - not the real thing, imitation So expressing as there is no such thing as a fake dom I'd beg to differ on that Wolf who wears sheep's clothing says he's a sheep doesnt make him a sheep he's still going to eat that flock makes the Wolf a fake sheep an imposter, an imitation A fake dom is an abuser masquerading in order get what they want. Could that beg the question, a fake sub is a pillow princess who hasn’t got what she wanted? There is no need for abuse in either the fet or vanilla world. It happens, unfortunately I suspect porn labels D/s in a bad light. B/d is great fun on a light note. D/s relationships are stunning. S/m has amused me. If it’s not fun, don’t do it. The discussion is validity of what a real vs fake dom is. But feel free to add since you pointed out earlier questioning another about there being no real Doms Let's understands the risks of a fake sub. What is a fake sub? How can one be described as real or fake sub? What harm does a fake sub bring to the community? What if it's a fake switch? Please carry on let's discuss this, you clearly express an interest" Smiles) no not really, I know a stunning relationship when I enter one. So really, plastic Dom’s and subs don’t interest me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. These people use the title of Dom this is what is being pointed out. Those who know what the roles of a dominant entails know they aren't Doms hence fake doms they have no intention of understanding what it is to be a Dom. Abusers using the guise of being dominant whos main target group are new to the scene and wishing to try being a sub. Fake - not the real thing, imitation So expressing as there is no such thing as a fake dom I'd beg to differ on that Wolf who wears sheep's clothing says he's a sheep doesnt make him a sheep he's still going to eat that flock makes the Wolf a fake sheep an imposter, an imitation A fake dom is an abuser masquerading in order get what they want. " I would say in response that you are referring to an assumption that there is a cookie cutter personality of a "real dom" but most people do kink for a variety of reasons and have a variety of personalities. The mantra of a dom should be to be as safe as possible and as considerate as possible. But by using the term dom no-one is saying that they are cookie cutter dom. That is something of new thinking. Saying that you are dom is saying no more than you like control. Therefore there is no wolf in sheep's clothing. There is nothing fake. I often use the example of mountaineering. If a new person walks into a place where mountaineers hangs out and says they want to go climbing. The new person speaks to a person and sets out their limitations. They climb and the mountaineer takes them up Everest and nearly kills the new person. The mountaineer is not fake, or "not a real mountaineer" they may be very skilled. But they are however a dangerous liability. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. These people use the title of Dom this is what is being pointed out. Those who know what the roles of a dominant entails know they aren't Doms hence fake doms they have no intention of understanding what it is to be a Dom. Abusers using the guise of being dominant whos main target group are new to the scene and wishing to try being a sub. Fake - not the real thing, imitation So expressing as there is no such thing as a fake dom I'd beg to differ on that Wolf who wears sheep's clothing says he's a sheep doesnt make him a sheep he's still going to eat that flock makes the Wolf a fake sheep an imposter, an imitation A fake dom is an abuser masquerading in order get what they want. I would say in response that you are referring to an assumption that there is a cookie cutter personality of a "real dom" but most people do kink for a variety of reasons and have a variety of personalities. The mantra of a dom should be to be as safe as possible and as considerate as possible. But by using the term dom no-one is saying that they are cookie cutter dom. That is something of new thinking. Saying that you are dom is saying no more than you like control. Therefore there is no wolf in sheep's clothing. There is nothing fake. I often use the example of mountaineering. If a new person walks into a place where mountaineers hangs out and says they want to go climbing. The new person speaks to a person and sets out their limitations. They climb and the mountaineer takes them up Everest and nearly kills the new person. The mountaineer is not fake, or "not a real mountaineer" they may be very skilled. But they are however a dangerous liability. " From everything I've said where have I expressed there's one type of Dom cookie cutter one size fits all? I'm an Alpha Primal, far from the norms of what people think about when BDSM is mentioned. I'm tired of repeating myself Good luck newbies to the scene stay safe Research research research Ask questions, lay out boundaries be specific Be sensible get to know the person before you put yourself into a situation where you're vulnerable and can't protect yourself. Common sense just because someone says they are a Dom doesn't mean they are | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. These people use the title of Dom this is what is being pointed out. Those who know what the roles of a dominant entails know they aren't Doms hence fake doms they have no intention of understanding what it is to be a Dom. Abusers using the guise of being dominant whos main target group are new to the scene and wishing to try being a sub. Fake - not the real thing, imitation So expressing as there is no such thing as a fake dom I'd beg to differ on that Wolf who wears sheep's clothing says he's a sheep doesnt make him a sheep he's still going to eat that flock makes the Wolf a fake sheep an imposter, an imitation A fake dom is an abuser masquerading in order get what they want. I would say in response that you are referring to an assumption that there is a cookie cutter personality of a "real dom" but most people do kink for a variety of reasons and have a variety of personalities. The mantra of a dom should be to be as safe as possible and as considerate as possible. But by using the term dom no-one is saying that they are cookie cutter dom. That is something of new thinking. Saying that you are dom is saying no more than you like control. Therefore there is no wolf in sheep's clothing. There is nothing fake. I often use the example of mountaineering. If a new person walks into a place where mountaineers hangs out and says they want to go climbing. The new person speaks to a person and sets out their limitations. They climb and the mountaineer takes them up Everest and nearly kills the new person. The mountaineer is not fake, or "not a real mountaineer" they may be very skilled. But they are however a dangerous liability. From everything I've said where have I expressed there's one type of Dom cookie cutter one size fits all? I'm an Alpha Primal, far from the norms of what people think about when BDSM is mentioned. I'm tired of repeating myself Good luck newbies to the scene stay safe Research research research Ask questions, lay out boundaries be specific Be sensible get to know the person before you put yourself into a situation where you're vulnerable and can't protect yourself. Common sense just because someone says they are a Dom doesn't mean they are " Also, have fun. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. These people use the title of Dom this is what is being pointed out. Those who know what the roles of a dominant entails know they aren't Doms hence fake doms they have no intention of understanding what it is to be a Dom. Abusers using the guise of being dominant whos main target group are new to the scene and wishing to try being a sub. Fake - not the real thing, imitation So expressing as there is no such thing as a fake dom I'd beg to differ on that Wolf who wears sheep's clothing says he's a sheep doesnt make him a sheep he's still going to eat that flock makes the Wolf a fake sheep an imposter, an imitation A fake dom is an abuser masquerading in order get what they want. I would say in response that you are referring to an assumption that there is a cookie cutter personality of a "real dom" but most people do kink for a variety of reasons and have a variety of personalities. The mantra of a dom should be to be as safe as possible and as considerate as possible. But by using the term dom no-one is saying that they are cookie cutter dom. That is something of new thinking. Saying that you are dom is saying no more than you like control. Therefore there is no wolf in sheep's clothing. There is nothing fake. I often use the example of mountaineering. If a new person walks into a place where mountaineers hangs out and says they want to go climbing. The new person speaks to a person and sets out their limitations. They climb and the mountaineer takes them up Everest and nearly kills the new person. The mountaineer is not fake, or "not a real mountaineer" they may be very skilled. But they are however a dangerous liability. From everything I've said where have I expressed there's one type of Dom cookie cutter one size fits all? I'm an Alpha Primal, far from the norms of what people think about when BDSM is mentioned. I'm tired of repeating myself Good luck newbies to the scene stay safe Research research research Ask questions, lay out boundaries be specific Be sensible get to know the person before you put yourself into a situation where you're vulnerable and can't protect yourself. Common sense just because someone says they are a Dom doesn't mean they are " People and their responses make me smile wryly. However, I am glad we have reached something on which we can agree. What you have said in the last paragraph I have been saying over the last four years on BDSM threads in the forum. The only change I would make to your last comments is for dom's be wary of subs and don't just jump in to play no matter how willing the sub. Both parties need to do their research. An easy example is when doing rope some people do a Japanese Kinbaku style. If they were to play with someone expecting a western style hands at a distance I want pretty rope for a lovely picture, they will find themselves accused of consent violation. It is up to both parties to know the parameters of play. Call me a wuss but I believe in defensive domming,a bit like defensive doctoring but without the medical qualification. Be safe, have fun. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there are they probably won't answer this. But the wannabes and fake doms might. " lol a wannabe dom I'm naturally dominant does that count | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The second level are people who are consistently ignoring safe words or agreed limits, these people are neither real or fake doms/dommes but are predatory abusers plain and simple. These people use the title of Dom this is what is being pointed out. Those who know what the roles of a dominant entails know they aren't Doms hence fake doms they have no intention of understanding what it is to be a Dom. Abusers using the guise of being dominant whos main target group are new to the scene and wishing to try being a sub. Fake - not the real thing, imitation So expressing as there is no such thing as a fake dom I'd beg to differ on that Wolf who wears sheep's clothing says he's a sheep doesnt make him a sheep he's still going to eat that flock makes the Wolf a fake sheep an imposter, an imitation A fake dom is an abuser masquerading in order get what they want. I would say in response that you are referring to an assumption that there is a cookie cutter personality of a "real dom" but most people do kink for a variety of reasons and have a variety of personalities. The mantra of a dom should be to be as safe as possible and as considerate as possible. But by using the term dom no-one is saying that they are cookie cutter dom. That is something of new thinking. Saying that you are dom is saying no more than you like control. Therefore there is no wolf in sheep's clothing. There is nothing fake. I often use the example of mountaineering. If a new person walks into a place where mountaineers hangs out and says they want to go climbing. The new person speaks to a person and sets out their limitations. They climb and the mountaineer takes them up Everest and nearly kills the new person. The mountaineer is not fake, or "not a real mountaineer" they may be very skilled. But they are however a dangerous liability. From everything I've said where have I expressed there's one type of Dom cookie cutter one size fits all? I'm an Alpha Primal, far from the norms of what people think about when BDSM is mentioned. I'm tired of repeating myself Good luck newbies to the scene stay safe Research research research Ask questions, lay out boundaries be specific Be sensible get to know the person before you put yourself into a situation where you're vulnerable and can't protect yourself. Common sense just because someone says they are a Dom doesn't mean they are People and their responses make me smile wryly. However, I am glad we have reached something on which we can agree. What you have said in the last paragraph I have been saying over the last four years on BDSM threads in the forum. The only change I would make to your last comments is for dom's be wary of subs and don't just jump in to play no matter how willing the sub. Both parties need to do their research. An easy example is when doing rope some people do a Japanese Kinbaku style. If they were to play with someone expecting a western style hands at a distance I want pretty rope for a lovely picture, they will find themselves accused of consent violation. It is up to both parties to know the parameters of play. Call me a wuss but I believe in defensive domming,a bit like defensive doctoring but without the medical qualification. Be safe, have fun. " This forum threads focus was on Doms real vs fake. Touching on submissive and issues I've encountered with new subs. They say they are no limits, can do anything to them they have no boundaries. So questions I ask them are things along the line of cbt? "Forced" feminization? Being pegged? Etc There is always boundaries and limits, the replies I get are no couldn't do cbt they are not into pain. So certainly its not no limits and certainly couldn't do just anything to them. I ask them to consider what they like and usual reply is they don't know. I ask them what have you seen thats caused arousal or fantasy? And so we start from there. Usually it's a photo, porno, someone's mentioned it or seen it in a club. I explain to them it's an adventure and a journey that I would happily guide them within my limits and boundaries. Sadly many of which want to rush straight in no work on trust or mental connection understanding each other face to face discussion about it basically the beginning social meet, arranging the contract and I'm uncomfortable with that I certainly don't want to be arrested for causing bodily harm because they decided after they really didn't like it though that's what was requested of me. So the most il do with anyone without a contract is some strap on play, a bit of light flogging or spanking, and gentle cbt that's as far as il go I wouldn't say there's fake subs just subs lacking knowledge and understanding they are still submissive or subs who wish to flip their nature their role and give their will to another. Many subs I've known have fallen into abusers traps and left with lasting memories and scars. Because they crave the domination, to be submissive but their knowledge is just as basic as most of societies look on what BDSM is and that the dominant has full control and power over a submissive and the dominant can do what ever they like to them because thats what they think it is all about. Which is why so many people judge BDSM they think it's the abusers way of thinking. A proper BDSM relationship in what ever manner it may be is safe, consensual, mutually agreed and mutually beneficial then that that's what should be focused on presenting to the world. More knowledge shared for people who want to join and be a part of the BDSM community and protecting them as best as the community can than leaving them to experience the bad and the worst of it for themselves. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’d expect an experienced Dom to ask me questions first and have a conversation about expectations. I don’t expect to be told what they’re going to do. As others have said being a Dom isn’t about abusing the sub. I’ve struggled to find a compatible Dom. I’ve had a Dom and a Domme but none recently. " Very good choice of terminology: experienced Dom is much better than real, and the opposite, inexperienced better than fake. Then you bring in compatibility - thank you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you have to get a certificate to be real? " This thread is becoming hilarious. You cannot fake authenticity. It doesn’t matter how many times you’ve watched fifty shades, how many BDSM blogs you’ve read, you either are or you are not a Dominant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you have to get a certificate to be real? This thread is becoming hilarious. You cannot fake authenticity. It doesn’t matter how many times you’ve watched fifty shades, how many BDSM blogs you’ve read, you either are or you are not a Dominant. " I'm a dominant end of | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |