FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Rip off Britain
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We don't have to go if we don't want to though, do we?" Very true as like anything you pay for.... Yes sir you both want to see planet of the apes. No problem that will be £5 for your wife/girlfriend/sister etc and £25 for you. Thank you sir.... Oh you want a couples ticket, no problem that will be £15 and your sister/friend will be free. Simplistic analogy I know But of course you don't have to go same cinema same facilities same movie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah and what about the atrocious cost of shaving your bollix smooth because of a huge mark-up on razor heads. For example, Gillette can afford to hire the likes of sports stars Roger Federer, Thierry Henry and Tiger Woods etc to advertise its Fusion products Apparently the actual product cost as little as 5p to make. But consumers are charged up to £2.43 a piece for them - a mark-up of more than 4,750%. A pack of eight costs £18.53, and becuase the replacement razor heads are so expensive, apparently they are now the most shoplifted product on British the High Streets. A pack of four Fusion Power cartridges seemingly costs only 20p to manufacture, plus 8p for packaging. But they are sold for £9.72 - a mark-up of £9.44. Yep rip off all right….. I’ll say we are being ripped off,,,,,,, and I’m not talking about wax strips!!! Ouch-ya Oop's... sorry folks... I seem to have wandered of topic again... but bugger,,,, I hate being ripped off with anything... " mens razors are much much better than womens. I bought a Venus and already on the second cartridge, whereas the Fusion i got last year (in a sale at Morrisons) is still working fine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We don't have to go if we don't want to though, do we? Very true as like anything you pay for.... Yes sir you both want to see planet of the apes. No problem that will be £5 for your wife/girlfriend/sister etc and £25 for you. Thank you sir.... Oh you want a couples ticket, no problem that will be £15 and your sister/friend will be free. Simplistic analogy I know But of course you don't have to go same cinema same facilities same movie" funny enough i never saw tons of guy clammering to get in to cinema,was range of people . lets face facts clubs could fill to the brim with single guys every night of the week with zero effort .thats why alot have limits of amount of single guys . would they still wanna go if there were no women there ??? well unless they were gay or bi then nope lol !! takes more to entice cpls or fems into clubs hence the incentives to draw them in . is it fair .. well of course not!! is moaning about gonna change it .. not in sligtest . is it business sense ..yes ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How would you fare in many clubs in Europe that not only have a massive waiting list for single guys, but operate an interview system for those guys that want to join and gain entry to clubs? This is very much the case in many French and Belgian clubs. If you think it is hard for single men in British clubs you would have plenty to moan about in other parts of the continent. " I live in the UK not on the continent. The membership style you mention ( going before a panel) falls in to what would be used in a private members club here in the UK, however the numbers seeking membership would probably fall out side and far exceed the rules governing these clubs and would also have to be used for single fems and couples. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've just searched through the meets section; and despite the recent 2010 changes to the equality act it's amazing how many 'clubs' still think they can and continue to over charge single men and to a lesser degree couples! These venues are service providers and as such cannot differentiate between the sexes re the charges for entry! They are not private members clubs for the most part as their membership criteria doesn't meet that requirement under the prescribed legislation. So we'll keep being ripped off!" Most are private members clubs, however that is irrelevant.The fact is their prices are clear and shown before entry. Does the bus discriminate when it charges less for children? No law says you cannot charge single men less to enter a bar or club.Never heard of ladies nights in nighclubs? Now if you want to rant about capitalism i am right behind you ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah and what about the atrocious cost of shaving your bollix smooth because of a huge mark-up on razor heads. For example, Gillette can afford to hire the likes of sports stars Roger Federer, Thierry Henry and Tiger Woods etc to advertise its Fusion products Apparently the actual product cost as little as 5p to make. But consumers are charged up to £2.43 a piece for them - a mark-up of more than 4,750%. A pack of eight costs £18.53, and becuase the replacement razor heads are so expensive, apparently they are now the most shoplifted product on British the High Streets. A pack of four Fusion Power cartridges seemingly costs only 20p to manufacture, plus 8p for packaging. But they are sold for £9.72 - a mark-up of £9.44. Yep rip off all right….. I’ll say we are being ripped off,,,,,,, and I’m not talking about wax strips!!! Ouch-ya Oop's... sorry folks... I seem to have wandered of topic again... but bugger,,,, I hate being ripped off with anything... mens razors are much much better than womens. I bought a Venus and already on the second cartridge, whereas the Fusion i got last year (in a sale at Morrisons) is still working fine. " Have to agree about razor prices! And although some ladies legs can blunt a mans razor by just being shown it I would agree that mens are better. Although I don't think that Gillette will be to concerned that it costs you more to shave your bollocks! Although I think that some women would happily pay extra if the could watch Roger Federer or Thierry Henry advertising by shaving their own. Tiger has possibly already been seen by most! lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We don't have to go if we don't want to though, do we?" Totally agree. If you don't like the price,don't go. Simple! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've just searched through the meets section; and despite the recent 2010 changes to the equality act it's amazing how many 'clubs' still think they can and continue to over charge single men and to a lesser degree couples! These venues are service providers and as such cannot differentiate between the sexes re the charges for entry! They are not private members clubs for the most part as their membership criteria doesn't meet that requirement under the prescribed legislation. So we'll keep being ripped off! Most are private members clubs, however that is irrelevant.The fact is their prices are clear and shown before entry. Does the bus discriminate when it charges less for children? No law says you cannot charge single men less to enter a bar or club.Never heard of ladies nights in nighclubs? Now if you want to rant about capitalism i am right behind you ! " Sorry to tell you but you are wrong over the charges. No club (vanilla) can discriminate it's entry fee. Ladies nights are singular events.. Private members clubs have to 'vet' prospective new members before a board and are limited to a very small number | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hold up, we are shocked this is even being brought up. Besides I know many nightclubs around that have dome deals like 'ladiea get in free' or 'ladies pay half price before 1am' ." Yes in the past but No longer aloud | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Was actually aware of these laws being drafted over two years ago by talking to the owner of a club However it really just would not work Not all laws are helpful " Came into force October 2010 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Mmmmm thirty quid for a fantastic social night With the opportunity to see live sex shows Relax in comfortable surroundings With more chance of pulling than most bars Ok single ladies get a good deal but do you really think they would go if they had to pay thirty quid? It could be argued that most men pay for nights out on the town with ladies if they both go to a normal bar I know in my case if I take a lady out I foot the bill Same principal really is it not? Xx " Being a gentlemen isn't the question. I surely don't have to tell you that their are a lot of independent ladies who prefer to pay for themselves or go Dutch and not just because they don't want to feel compromised or perhaps qbe expected to go further but because it's their right to do so I still walk on the outside next to the kirb or open a door because that's the way I was brought up. I think youve missed the point. Free sex show? Sounds like you're in a different kind of club | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Mmmmm thirty quid for a fantastic social night With the opportunity to see live sex shows Relax in comfortable surroundings With more chance of pulling than most bars Ok single ladies get a good deal but do you really think they would go if they had to pay thirty quid? It could be argued that most men pay for nights out on the town with ladies if they both go to a normal bar I know in my case if I take a lady out I foot the bill Same principal really is it not? Xx Being a gentlemen isn't the question. I surely don't have to tell you that their are a lot of independent ladies who prefer to pay for themselves or go Dutch and not just because they don't want to feel compromised or perhaps qbe expected to go further but because it's their right to do so I still walk on the outside next to the kirb or open a door because that's the way I was brought up. I think youve missed the point. Free sex show? Sounds like you're in a different kind of club" I ain't saying I don't agree with you of course I do!!! But I just can't see how it would work It would destroy the clubs overnight And as fa not seeing free sex shows you must go to some odd clubs then xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is the OP's desired outcome? Does he want equal charges, with the resultant change in attendance proportion (I assume we're all agreed that the ratios would get a lot worse)? Or Is he just provoking an argument for the sake of it? If the former, he should start complaining to his local Trading Standards office. If the latter, can he please start from a more coherent position next time? The thread title is clearly not the subject, as his point is that there is a law to prevent price disparity (see also his dismissal of discussion about any other country - 'Rip Off Britain' is a comparative term, which by its very nature requires other countries to be referenced). On the point of nightclub 'Ladies Nights' being one offs - firstly, I suggest some more thorough research on that (he'll find out he's wrong); secondly, most clubs have nights where no single men are allowed at all, so could argue that the male-chargeable nights are the exception rather than the rule. " Totally agree with this reply - what's the issue with this thread? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is the OP's desired outcome? Does he want equal charges, with the resultant change in attendance proportion (I assume we're all agreed that the ratios would get a lot worse)? Or Is he just provoking an argument for the sake of it? If the former, he should start complaining to his local Trading Standards office. If the latter, can he please start from a more coherent position next time? The thread title is clearly not the subject, as his point is that there is a law to prevent price disparity (see also his dismissal of discussion about any other country - 'Rip Off Britain' is a comparative term, which by its very nature requires other countries to be referenced). On the point of nightclub 'Ladies Nights' being one offs - firstly, I suggest some more thorough research on that (he'll find out he's wrong); secondly, most clubs have nights where no single men are allowed at all, so could argue that the male-chargeable nights are the exception rather than the rule. " OK, firstly title is what the title is and not rip off Europe; as the Equality law 2010 relates to the UK and not mainland Europe or the USA it relates to here.. We all know that here in the UK we are being over charged for a whole host of products compared to other countries. fact! check ebay if you don't believe me. this thread I though was quite clear and as I've read others have also thought so too.. the argument re other countries does not hold water as I have stated that despite the NEW legislation brought in in October 2010 for the UK that this practise should have come to an end.. If you went to any other service provider and they said you must pay more because of your gender would you still be happy? clearly it will take some one with the brass neck to take this on...but I'm sure it will happen.. I fail to see how equal charges will affect attendance as the amount of single ladies who go to clubs are already outnumbered hugely.. And that's from my own personal experience of attending couples and singles nights. I have already said that clearly couples only nights are the only time you have equality in terms of gender,unless single fems are aloud at the same time as couples..which is then discriminating on gender re single guys.. its a mind field and clearly an awful lot are not aware of this legislation.. and you cannot offer reduced charges to get in to a night club any more for either gender. you don't have to like it but like most things you will have to accept it. So why should this be provoking an argument? this as other threads has informed but also shown that some are and some not aware of what occurred in October 2010. If you didn't know or hadn't realised that these changes have happened you are aware now. I can understand the desire to protect your favourite club...but step back a minute and remember they are not there out of the goodness of their heart but to make a profit off you.. Reduced membership can be offered as an inducement to genders who may not be being fully represented but for a 'limited time'. surely you can understand that for every single female that plays there will always be far more guys no matter what price difference. I know you will understand this; that despite this site being free there is an awful lot more guys than single females represented,true or false? Excellent clubs will adapt and still make a profit of you because they can and will. they have survived the no smoking legislation. I think that it may in some part be about your thoughts that you may have to deal with increased competition. but that's the case already on singles nights.. unless some one out there can tell me of a club that is equally represented by all with the present difference in charges in place. This has affected far larger clubs than just swingers clubs as you golfers can attest too. I would suggest you check out the .gov or human rights website for this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm willing to bet that if clubs were ordered to charge equally for everyone that they would find another way to keep things as they are. Totally off the top of my head (and I've no idea if these would be affected by the equality law):- 1) Restricted numbers of guys allowed in, first 30 or whatever. And couples/single women are allowed to be on a guest list. 2) Men only allowed to visit xxx times a year. 3) Switch over to private members club rules (which I thought swingers clubs were anyway?) and out a lot of the guys via interviews etc." Indeed they would have to find a way around it, or they would become wank clubs (men walking around playing). As many have said, the balance/ratio has to be right 1 single woman, 3 couples, 50 men, will it work, No. I certainly wouldn't want to go to a swing club full of men, I can go to a football match if I want to see a load of W######kers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm willing to bet that if clubs were ordered to charge equally for everyone that they would find another way to keep things as they are. Totally off the top of my head (and I've no idea if these would be affected by the equality law):- 1) Restricted numbers of guys allowed in, first 30 or whatever. And couples/single women are allowed to be on a guest list. 2) Men only allowed to visit xxx times a year. 3) Switch over to private members club rules (which I thought swingers clubs were anyway?) and out a lot of the guys via interviews etc." interesting ideas and these are covered by the legislation.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"_john121, your right, now what are you going to do? " EXACTLEY! lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most clubs do this to stop the guys who just want to go and have a dam good wank. they are trying to sort out the genuine guys who want to play. And as someone has already said, its still cheeper than a night out on the town with the boys. Also like its already been said, dont like it dont go simples. As a couple we dont mind paying more than a single lady as we know how hard it is to get the single ladys in there as it is. YEhhhh in this country and im sure many more, we all get riped off lots with lots of things, hey thats life get over it lol." so why aren't there an equal number of single ladies on a free site like this if your logic is to be followed through. And if the currently there are not equal numbers of single ladies then the it's not working now is it? Do you like to be ripped off or do you shop around? gas electric for example. And when you find the cheapest or best value do you believe that everyone should be entitled to it or just you.. again simplistic but understandable.. why do you think these changes have been brought in? would you prefer to be exempt from them or benefit? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just think how much it is to pay for a good hotel room and the price to go to a good club. Which would you prefer." I won't use a hotel room just for sex so for me it doesn't relate. but they do charge you the same amount for the room whether you male or female or a couple. however, from what I understand you can gate late bookings very cheap! but this is a whole other thread which has been covered re hotel room meets. People are assuming that I'm looking to dramatically reduce the cost for male membership and interestingly nobody has asked that question. well I'm sure that a little reduction from some of the charges that I've seen here would be excellent and welcomed but in general I'm not. its all about pointing out that there should be equality in these charges as laid out in the new legislation. So some clever re thinking may be needed by some clubs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My housemate feels the same. He thinks clubs rip off single men, and to an extent couples. It is often cheaper for his wife to visit a club with me, then it is for him to go with her. So he doesn't go. He doesn't sit here complaining about it. Simples! I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying it's wrong. But complain about it, and all you will succeed in doing is closing clubs down, and there isn't enough of them as it is. " love it! he feels so strongly that he doesn't go with his wife! also forums are a place to air your views,complain,praise what ever are they not? So he chooses not to mention it here so is it fair for what sounds like a couple who are concious of the spend limits that he feels he cant attend? or perhaps he just likes to here her stories of the evenings events. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am not saying its right but for me it is cheaper to travel and go to chams than it is to have a night on the town plus a whole lot more fun." perfect and honest response and you are to be applauded for it. It just goes to show that we all have our perhaps shall I say 'personal' reasons for keeping it as it is.. purse and pleasure and nothing to do with what's right. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a single guy I accept that I'm going to pay more for entry into a club, that's just the way it is. I'm sure the only other option would be to raise the entry fee for single females and couples, which in turn would lead to falling numbers attending and eventually lead to clubs closing. Most clubs don't have a licence to sell alcohol so they need to generate income somehow." why accept? weak argument. remember the petrol crisis? Daganham ladies strike? for those of a slightly older disposition or those who have watched the film. clubs will adapt | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Same applies to clubs that have smoking zones indoors. It's all against the law. Just because u have to charge the same doesn't meant u will have more man and less women. You can still cap them equally. Like.. no more than 30 men or women. Instead of charging 20 to men and 0 to women , 10th to each, then a gent can always buy a drink inside to a lady. Less women would go? Yes but the ones that wouldn't are the ones that just go to mess about to raise their self esteem :p You might disagree with me but the law its the law . Not that in UK anyone gets punished for anything.. people get caught driving with no tax. Driving insurance etc and get 100£ fine and 6points on a licence u don't have. LOL" Some interesting and dangerous to your personal health comments! lol I agree re the driving imposed fines but when you take on the equalities commission the fines might be a little more aggressive in their content! interestingly I watched a prog recently where a gentleman was employing at least 2 illegal workers and he was fined £20,000! makes you think. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"so why aren't there an equal number of single ladies on a free site like this if your logic is to be followed through. And if the currently there are not equal numbers of single ladies then the it's not working now is it?" You can't legislate for sexual desire. The fact is, more men than women want NSA sex. I presently pay £5 to use a swingers club because it's a cost-effective solution to meeting like-minded men. If this was increased to £25, my decision making process would still be the same (what's a cost-effective way for me to meet men for NSA sex), and my conclusion would be to work slightly harder in pubs or vanilla nightclubs. OK, so it's not fair that men have to pay more, but that's TOUGH! No amount of legislation can make me pay to get NSA sex, when I can get it for free. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think maybe some posters missing the Op's point. Discrimination is illegal. October 2010 underlined it and future legislation will most likely continue to close possible 'loopholes'. I (and I'm sure the Op) fully understand the impact this is likely to have on current swinging clubs, the status quo suits the clubs, single women and men who are willing to accept discrimination to not 'rock the boat'. I agree with many on here that clubs in their current format would struggle but in my opinion the current business model of many swinging clubs is simply not sustainable. The basic business model hinges on attracting women to a club and then charging men a disproportionate fee to have access to the women in that club. Increasing the price for women simply makes a club less attractive to them and then in turn less attractive to single guys. I get that, but the law does not respect business models, it respects human rights. Business has to adapt. We were told the smoking ban would kill the restaurant, club and pub industry. Some have suffered, but many have adapted and prospered. The business model for swinging clubs will simply change when these clubs are eventually challenged through legal channels. (There is a section in the 2010 act that does allow for instances when under represented groups can be treated differently, I have been advised through legal channels that single women in a swinging club is highly unlikely to be accepted as one of these groups by a court, but until challenged no one can be certain). Please don't assume by my post that I am flying the flag for change, I don't use clubs, I am just stating the facts as I see them and refusing to bury my head in the sand. I don't think we should underestimate the ingenuity of entrepreneurs and their ability to devise business plans that adapt to suit legislation, changing tastes and demands. At times in life it may be easier to just accept discrimination and not rock the boat, it doesn't make it right though. " I fully understand what you are saying blackspice But totally disagree with your comparison to the smoking ban And at the moment so do a consortium of MPs that are trying to get that particular law relaxed to save the pub trade As I said in an earlier post some laws may be right but are NOT always helpful | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My housemate feels the same. He thinks clubs rip off single men, and to an extent couples. It is often cheaper for his wife to visit a club with me, then it is for him to go with her. So he doesn't go. He doesn't sit here complaining about it. Simples! I'm not saying it's right, I'm not saying it's wrong. But complain about it, and all you will succeed in doing is closing clubs down, and there isn't enough of them as it is. love it! he feels so strongly that he doesn't go with his wife! also forums are a place to air your views,complain,praise what ever are they not? So he chooses not to mention it here so is it fair for what sounds like a couple who are concious of the spend limits that he feels he cant attend? or perhaps he just likes to here her stories of the evenings events." Said housemate here, it is not about money constraints, if we chose to go together we could afford it. The reason he does not do to clubs is firstly he is not a club person, where I am and happily go to clubs when the chance arises. Secondly, he and I object to the fact that if I go on my own I get in free, but as a couple we pay anything from £20.00 up to £30.00. Yes this is cheaper that a single guy rate, but why are we are a couple paying nearly as much as a single guy, when as a single female I get in for free. Yes forums are a place to complain and discuss views but to be honest he chooses not to go to clubs and it works for us as I end up not paying anything. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think maybe some posters missing the Op's point. Discrimination is illegal. October 2010 underlined it and future legislation will most likely continue to close possible 'loopholes'. I (and I'm sure the Op) fully understand the impact this is likely to have on current swinging clubs, the status quo suits the clubs, single women and men who are willing to accept discrimination to not 'rock the boat'. I agree with many on here that clubs in their current format would struggle but in my opinion the current business model of many swinging clubs is simply not sustainable. The basic business model hinges on attracting women to a club and then charging men a disproportionate fee to have access to the women in that club. Increasing the price for women simply makes a club less attractive to them and then in turn less attractive to single guys. I get that, but the law does not respect business models, it respects human rights. Business has to adapt. We were told the smoking ban would kill the restaurant, club and pub industry. Some have suffered, but many have adapted and prospered. The business model for swinging clubs will simply change when these clubs are eventually challenged through legal channels. (There is a section in the 2010 act that does allow for instances when under represented groups can be treated differently, I have been advised through legal channels that single women in a swinging club is highly unlikely to be accepted as one of these groups by a court, but until challenged no one can be certain). Please don't assume by my post that I am flying the flag for change, I don't use clubs, I am just stating the facts as I see them and refusing to bury my head in the sand. I don't think we should underestimate the ingenuity of entrepreneurs and their ability to devise business plans that adapt to suit legislation, changing tastes and demands. At times in life it may be easier to just accept discrimination and not rock the boat, it doesn't make it right though. I fully understand what you are saying blackspice But totally disagree with your comparison to the smoking ban And at the moment so do a consortium of MPs that are trying to get that particular law relaxed to save the pub trade As I said in an earlier post some laws may be right but are NOT always helpful " Agreed. Well over half the pubs locally have closed since the smoking ban. The only ones left are more restaurant than pub. What will you get if the prices are equalised? Same as what happened when men pressurised the government about AOP bus passes (women at 60 and men at 65). The women lost out on 5 years full bus pass. Way to go campaigners. The mens price into clubs will NOT come down. Female prices will go up. Way to go campaigners | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"so why aren't there an equal number of single ladies on a free site like this if your logic is to be followed through. And if the currently there are not equal numbers of single ladies then the it's not working now is it? You can't legislate for sexual desire. The fact is, more men than women want NSA sex. I presently pay £5 to use a swingers club because it's a cost-effective solution to meeting like-minded men. If this was increased to £25, my decision making process would still be the same (what's a cost-effective way for me to meet men for NSA sex), and my conclusion would be to work slightly harder in pubs or vanilla nightclubs. OK, so it's not fair that men have to pay more, but that's TOUGH! No amount of legislation can make me pay to get NSA sex, when I can get it for free." sorry but here's another honest answer its all about self self self...any way you cut it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think maybe some posters missing the Op's point. Discrimination is illegal. October 2010 underlined it and future legislation will most likely continue to close possible 'loopholes'. I (and I'm sure the Op) fully understand the impact this is likely to have on current swinging clubs, the status quo suits the clubs, single women and men who are willing to accept discrimination to not 'rock the boat'. I agree with many on here that clubs in their current format would struggle but in my opinion the current business model of many swinging clubs is simply not sustainable. The basic business model hinges on attracting women to a club and then charging men a disproportionate fee to have access to the women in that club. Increasing the price for women simply makes a club less attractive to them and then in turn less attractive to single guys. I get that, but the law does not respect business models, it respects human rights. Business has to adapt. We were told the smoking ban would kill the restaurant, club and pub industry. Some have suffered, but many have adapted and prospered. The business model for swinging clubs will simply change when these clubs are eventually challenged through legal channels. (There is a section in the 2010 act that does allow for instances when under represented groups can be treated differently, I have been advised through legal channels that single women in a swinging club is highly unlikely to be accepted as one of these groups by a court, but until challenged no one can be certain). Please don't assume by my post that I am flying the flag for change, I don't use clubs, I am just stating the facts as I see them and refusing to bury my head in the sand. I don't think we should underestimate the ingenuity of entrepreneurs and their ability to devise business plans that adapt to suit legislation, changing tastes and demands. At times in life it may be easier to just accept discrimination and not rock the boat, it doesn't make it right though. I fully understand what you are saying blackspice But totally disagree with your comparison to the smoking ban And at the moment so do a consortium of MPs that are trying to get that particular law relaxed to save the pub trade As I said in an earlier post some laws may be right but are NOT always helpful Agreed. Well over half the pubs locally have closed since the smoking ban. The only ones left are more restaurant than pub. What will you get if the prices are equalised? Same as what happened when men pressurised the government about AOP bus passes (women at 60 and men at 65). The women lost out on 5 years full bus pass. Way to go campaigners. The mens price into clubs will NOT come down. Female prices will go up. Way to go campaigners " businesses will survive some will close some new will ones will appear thats what happens to businesses! remember Woolies? sad but true..and all of these businesses will have to follow all of the legislation of the land not pick and choose which they feel is for them... As some have pointed out pubs have closed and again these pubs are not there for charitable reasons but to make money! pure and simple! yes it is sad when some ones lively hood goes and it's terrible when a business goes under but these are the facts; it happens.. open your eyes and realise all you're are doing is lining someone elses pocket and if you think different well wake up and smell the roses.. I challenge anyone here who thinks it's right that its ok to pay different wages for the same job based solely on whether you're male or female...then tell me where is the difference..you're still paying to use the same service and facilities so why should one pay less or more | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Tried to reply to you But exactly my point on fem prices going up and that's what will kill it " why should it? are you saying that women wont pay more? are you saying they only go because its cheap or free? clearly then men are happy to pay what ever because they must be desperate and willing to pay anything for a shag? funny isn't it a little analogy QPR have just announced they will be reducing their ticket prices after listening to their fans. clearly they don't think its going to make them go out of business do they.. ok not a swinging club at least I don't think so... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Tried to reply to you But exactly my point on fem prices going up and that's what will kill it why should it? are you saying that women wont pay more? are you saying they only go because its cheap or free? clearly then men are happy to pay what ever because they must be desperate and willing to pay anything for a shag? funny isn't it a little analogy QPR have just announced they will be reducing their ticket prices after listening to their fans. clearly they don't think its going to make them go out of business do they.. ok not a swinging club at least I don't think so... " poor lamb..just hope you feel equally as passionate about the discrimination women still encounter in the workplace on a daily basis | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"............ We were told the smoking ban would kill the restaurant, club and pub industry. Some have suffered, but many have adapted and prospered............ I fully understand what you are saying blackspice But totally disagree with your comparison to the smoking ban And at the moment so do a consortium of MPs that are trying to get that particular law relaxed to save the pub trade As I said in an earlier post some laws may be right but are NOT always helpful " Your totally right Soaps about the small group of MP's and the rather larger group of powerful lobbyists. (The general concensus is that they've got zero chance of changing the law). I am not arguing the rights or wrongs of the legislation. It is a fact that some pubs have gone bust, it is also a fact that some have adapted and prospered. Are you suggesting legislators should pay more attention to profits than they do to human rights or public health? I agree with the point behind your argument, if clubs are forced to change because of the law of the land and do not adapt to that change, then they will go bust and everyone loses. All I would add is that I believe clubs will adapt or new entrants to the Market will prosper under a different business model. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" why should it? are you saying that women wont pay more? are you saying they only go because its cheap or free? clearly then men are happy to pay what ever because they must be desperate and willing to pay anything for a shag? funny isn't it ok not a swinging club at least I don't think so... " all in all a very interesting thread ! I agree with the above, there is what seems to be a mass discrimination from the women towards the men in certain parts of our swing society, admittedly not all women are like this, but there is a large section out there who de mean the men in this culture. Ok so a lot of guys on here don't do the genuine ones any favours, but until there is some sort of level playing field, then progress cannot be made ? Personally I would love to go to more club nights, but I don't..... A. because I can't afford the extra cost of being a male B. because I just don't think it's fair. Somewhere and somehow, good decent, fun, respectful single men are loosing out because of this, and there fore so are the women/couples looking for them ! The interview process sounds like a winner to me and is something I would quite happily submit too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beach Party this Sunday. Single women - 50 on the list so far. 90(ish)% will turn up. £40 babysitter (if applicable). Outfit £25. Waxing services £20. Haircut/blow dry/colour £20-£80. Cost to get their on their own £5.00-£50. Room cost £35 (all paid by themselves). Alcohol, condoms, lube etc £15.00 Total cost between £165 - £250 all paid for by themselves Couples - 250 on the list - 85% will turn up. Entrance fee £20.00. £40 babysitter (if applicable). Outfit £25 for her. Waxing services £20. Haircut/blow dry/colour (her)£20-£80. Cost to get there £5.00-£50. Room cost £35. Alcohol, condoms, lube etc £15.00 Total cost between 2 people £175 - £280. Totals between £90.00 - £140.00 each. Single guy. 140 on list. 30% will turn up. Entrance Fee £30.00. Cost to get their on their own £5.00-£50. Room cost £35 (all paid by themselves). Alcohol, condoms, lube etc £15.00 Total £85 - £130. Now, I KNOW I'm overstating figures and generalising but it's cheaper for a man to go out for the night to a club (unless he's paying for an escort/prostitute) as they have minimal outlay compared to single females (most of whom you will find on here have children) and couples. So tell me........... who's getting the best deal? Who are those who want the club facilities but fail to attend? Who rarely book a hotel room because they have to get home to the wife? (I know that was bitchy....... ) Who go in expecting sex because they have paid? Who outnumbers on clubs memberships list by at least 100 to 1..... SINGLE MEN. If you don't like it, either shut up, don't use a club or fricking complain to your local trading standards. All the clubs will do is either go bust because to charge single females and couples the same will put club swinging in the super luxury league..... Or, close the single male lists and only have the selected few attend..... and that won't be the overweight, ugly, whining, whinging, married, idiotic, knob wobblers who stand in the corners of everyroom wanking themselves silly because they don't actually want sex, they just want a cheap thrill in the form of cheap live porn. " 1. Men also dye hair, buy new outfits and get waxings ! 2. Some single men also have children ! 3. Stop beating on Single men as a whole ! 4. we are not all that bad ffs ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"so why aren't there an equal number of single ladies on a free site like this if your logic is to be followed through. And if the currently there are not equal numbers of single ladies then the it's not working now is it?" Because there are less single women into swinging than single men. If this site charged then there would be even less. And then men would moan even more!! "Do you like to be ripped off or do you shop around? gas electric for example." Then shop around. There are clubs that charge a low price for gents and no membership fee. "And when you find the cheapest or best value do you believe that everyone should be entitled to it or just you.. " I have a feeling that you are going to be the one who does this. I do hope you are willing to face the consequences when there are 100s of horny women not going to clubs but still not willing to sleep wit you. Yes its unfair. So is the fact that women still haven't got equal rights and equal pay. Something has to make up for it! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beach Party this Sunday. Single women - 50 on the list so far. 90(ish)% will turn up. £40 babysitter (if applicable). Outfit £25. Waxing services £20. Haircut/blow dry/colour £20-£80. Cost to get their on their own £5.00-£50. Room cost £35 (all paid by themselves). Alcohol, condoms, lube etc £15.00 Total cost between £165 - £250 all paid for by themselves Couples - 250 on the list - 85% will turn up. Entrance fee £20.00. £40 babysitter (if applicable). Outfit £25 for her. Waxing services £20. Haircut/blow dry/colour (her)£20-£80. Cost to get there £5.00-£50. Room cost £35. Alcohol, condoms, lube etc £15.00 Total cost between 2 people £175 - £280. Totals between £90.00 - £140.00 each. Single guy. 140 on list. 30% will turn up. Entrance Fee £30.00. Cost to get their on their own £5.00-£50. Room cost £35 (all paid by themselves). Alcohol, condoms, lube etc £15.00 Total £85 - £130. Now, I KNOW I'm overstating figures and generalising but it's cheaper for a man to go out for the night to a club (unless he's paying for an escort/prostitute) as they have minimal outlay compared to single females (most of whom you will find on here have children) and couples. So tell me........... who's getting the best deal? Who are those who want the club facilities but fail to attend? Who rarely book a hotel room because they have to get home to the wife? (I know that was bitchy....... ) Who go in expecting sex because they have paid? Who outnumbers on clubs memberships list by at least 100 to 1..... SINGLE MEN. If you don't like it, either shut up, don't use a club or fricking complain to your local trading standards. All the clubs will do is either go bust because to charge single females and couples the same will put club swinging in the super luxury league..... Or, close the single male lists and only have the selected few attend..... and that won't be the overweight, ugly, whining, whinging, married, idiotic, knob wobblers who stand in the corners of everyroom wanking themselves silly because they don't actually want sex, they just want a cheap thrill in the form of cheap live porn. 1. Men also dye hair, buy new outfits and get waxings ! 2. Some single men also have children ! 3. Stop beating on Single men as a whole ! 4. we are not all that bad ffs !" I know you are not all bad and I was generalising as you can tell. However, my point still stands. Make everyone pay the same as single men and the supply and demand of clubs will be so off kilter that they will either go bust or will only allow a select few in. Unfortunately, the ratio's in swinging are much the same anywhere.... 100 single men, 50 couples, 5 single women. It's the single men who think that swinging is an easy shag (we know they exist) that push the prices up for the true single male swingers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Basically a large bunch of socially inept and creepy men have feckin ruined it for all the super sexy wonder star single men out there ! If your listening window lickers ! I feckin hate you xx" And that is the truest statement spoken this week. By the way......... YOU may adhere to any rules set by private clubs regarding an interview etc........ but what would you say to those clubs that wouldn't take you? Would you moan? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Basically a large bunch of socially inept and creepy men have feckin ruined it for all the super sexy wonder star single men out there ! If your listening window lickers ! I feckin hate you xx And that is the truest statement spoken this week. By the way......... YOU may adhere to any rules set by private clubs regarding an interview etc........ but what would you say to those clubs that wouldn't take you? Would you moan?" No way that I would moan !! If you can't handle rejection then swinging is so not the right place for you The whole single male situation is so frustrating, makes me want to get out of a lifestyle that has been part of my life for almost six years now But then everynow and then someone see's through the cloud of spunk and drool and notices you, and it's all worth while !! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually just thought a summat Been on the scene a long time nearly thirty years actually Joined Chams when it first opened and was a single male then as well Did I even think about the unfairness of the pricing structure? Did I hell as like I was just simply happy to be accepted into a pleasant and friendly club " Were you tall enough to see over the bar in those days? I know you shrink as you get old! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually just thought a summat Been on the scene a long time nearly thirty years actually Joined Chams when it first opened and was a single male then as well Did I even think about the unfairness of the pricing structure? Did I hell as like I was just simply happy to be accepted into a pleasant and friendly club " Probably because you are a realist Soapy, instead of moaning about life you get on with living it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But then everynow and then someone see's through the cloud of spunk and drool and notices you, and it's all worth while !! " D'awww thats so romantic! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But then everynow and then someone see's through the cloud of spunk and drool and notices you, and it's all worth while !! D'awww thats so romantic! " Romance on a swinging site ???? hmmm.... now I am confused PMSL x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The Title 'Rip Off Britain' is in itself misleading, swingers club entry fees for single males are generally higher than for Couples and Females in most other EU countries as well.... The clubs we use in Gran Canaria work on this basis, as do the ones we use in France and Belgium on occasion. In fact it is more often than not that single guys don't get to enter many European clubs on weekends. " The title is misleading, I would be surprised if there's anywhere in the world where single men are not charged a premium or restricted in some way, but different places have different laws or ways of enforcing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The Title 'Rip Off Britain' is in itself misleading, swingers club entry fees for single males are generally higher than for Couples and Females in most other EU countries as well.... The clubs we use in Gran Canaria work on this basis, as do the ones we use in France and Belgium on occasion. In fact it is more often than not that single guys don't get to enter many European clubs on weekends. " re-read opening thread and then the rest title not rip off europe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The Title 'Rip Off Britain' is in itself misleading, swingers club entry fees for single males are generally higher than for Couples and Females in most other EU countries as well.... The clubs we use in Gran Canaria work on this basis, as do the ones we use in France and Belgium on occasion. In fact it is more often than not that single guys don't get to enter many European clubs on weekends. The title is misleading, I would be surprised if there's anywhere in the world where single men are not charged a premium or restricted in some way, but different places have different laws or ways of enforcing. " why is it misleading? do we not live in Britain? the equality act relates to here.. talk about splitting hairs! lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The Title 'Rip Off Britain' is in itself misleading, swingers club entry fees for single males are generally higher than for Couples and Females in most other EU countries as well.... The clubs we use in Gran Canaria work on this basis, as do the ones we use in France and Belgium on occasion. In fact it is more often than not that single guys don't get to enter many European clubs on weekends. re-read opening thread and then the rest title not rip off europe" No need to act like a smart ass....your thread title 'Rip off Britain' makes it sound like it is only this country that works on this entry fee basis....and it's not, it's the norm.....everywhere. Why open a thread if you expect everyone to agree with your stance?, it's a discussion forum....not a place to dictate without debate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ffs, John! If YOU feel that strongly that you have to use QPR prices as a simile with a swingers club, then you really ought to quit while you’re behind! QPR (apart from the football they play) are not trying to reduce one type of person gaining entry, swingers clubs are! The only other way would be to let no more than a certain number into the club and that would bring you out again shouting that it’s not fair! But if you let anyone in who wants to go in, you would very quickly find that it would turn into an almost all male club! You may not like it, but I am sure it will continue. Just like some of the facilities for smoking. Some clubs have shelters that definitely do not comply with the current legislation, but you are not griping about that! You chose to try and get laid by using swinger facilities, so you have to accept the cost for that! We very rarely frequent clubs because the nearest to us and others that we like the look of allow single guys in on a Saturday and we just don’t want them. When we have been to clubs with single guys there, we have been followed about most of the evening, so perhaps they ought to charge the same for admission as couples but tack on a “Nuisance Tax” One final point… If you feel that strongly, grow some balls and go to trading standards yourself! " ol lol lol QPR just demonstrates that when enough people shout someone will eventually listen.. hence the new equality legislation.. boy! you do have to point it out to some! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"so why aren't there an equal number of single ladies on a free site like this if your logic is to be followed through. And if the currently there are not equal numbers of single ladies then the it's not working now is it? Because there are less single women into swinging than single men. If this site charged then there would be even less. And then men would moan even more!! Do you like to be ripped off or do you shop around? gas electric for example. Then shop around. There are clubs that charge a low price for gents and no membership fee. And when you find the cheapest or best value do you believe that everyone should be entitled to it or just you.. I have a feeling that you are going to be the one who does this. I do hope you are willing to face the consequences when there are 100s of horny women not going to clubs but still not willing to sleep wit you. Yes its unfair. So is the fact that women still haven't got equal rights and equal pay. Something has to make up for it!" lol lol lol lol sorry but haven't heard such utter tosh! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"QPR just demonstrates that when enough people shout someone will eventually listen.. hence the new equality legislation.. boy! you do have to point it out to some!" But you can't use a football club as comparison. Football teams get a lot of money from sponsors that advertise on their grounds. Now I may have only been to a few clubs, but nowhere have I seen 'Chameleons! Sponsored by Durex!' or 'Le Chambre! Sponsored by Vanish!'. Maybe not a bad idea but how would the clubs then get the sponsorship needed without every tabloid hack coming and having a nosy? QPR is a lot more likely to be able to subsidise reduced membership. Straw man there I am afraid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"so why aren't there an equal number of single ladies on a free site like this if your logic is to be followed through. And if the currently there are not equal numbers of single ladies then the it's not working now is it? Because there are less single women into swinging than single men. If this site charged then there would be even less. And then men would moan even more!! Do you like to be ripped off or do you shop around? gas electric for example. Then shop around. There are clubs that charge a low price for gents and no membership fee. And when you find the cheapest or best value do you believe that everyone should be entitled to it or just you.. I have a feeling that you are going to be the one who does this. I do hope you are willing to face the consequences when there are 100s of horny women not going to clubs but still not willing to sleep wit you. Yes its unfair. So is the fact that women still haven't got equal rights and equal pay. Something has to make up for it! lol lol lol lol sorry but haven't heard such utter tosh!" Ah, the ad hominem attack. Classic derailing when unable to respond to points raised. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"............ We were told the smoking ban would kill the restaurant, club and pub industry. Some have suffered, but many have adapted and prospered............ I fully understand what you are saying blackspice But totally disagree with your comparison to the smoking ban And at the moment so do a consortium of MPs that are trying to get that particular law relaxed to save the pub trade As I said in an earlier post some laws may be right but are NOT always helpful Your totally right Soaps about the small group of MP's and the rather larger group of powerful lobbyists. (The general concensus is that they've got zero chance of changing the law). I am not arguing the rights or wrongs of the legislation. It is a fact that some pubs have gone bust, it is also a fact that some have adapted and prospered. Are you suggesting legislators should pay more attention to profits than they do to human rights or public health? I agree with the point behind your argument, if clubs are forced to change because of the law of the land and do not adapt to that change, then they will go bust and everyone loses. All I would add is that I believe clubs will adapt or new entrants to the Market will prosper under a different business model. " SPOT ON! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The title is misleading, I would be surprised if there's anywhere in the world where single men are not charged a premium or restricted in some way, but different places have different laws or ways of enforcing. why is it misleading? do we not live in Britain? the equality act relates to here.. talk about splitting hairs! lol" I think it's misleading because nowhere in your postings are you compared or contrasted the situation in Britain with anywhere else. Had the title been 'rip off swinging clubs' that may have been more accurate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Serious lack of logical thought by the OP. that law will not help the Clubs, nor will it help the people who visit them. Message to the OP - Be careful what you wish for and remember the law of unintended consequences." This law will not help ANYONE something the OP seem to be incapable of understanding. The entrance cost for single women going up to that of a single male (it will not go the other way)? How is that going to help anyone? one argument seems to be "It's the Law and it must be obeyed" well apparently it is also the law that you can shoot a welshman after dark with your longbow if he is found to be within the confines of Hereford. It is also against the law to play football on a sunday and you can be jailed for being a witch. In some situations some laws are just plain stupid | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Of course people won't go if they don't like the way they are being ripped off, but thats not really the point I think. If I was a single male going to clubs I might be feeling ripped off too, I know people have said the reasons why the clubs charge this way, on this thread and other threads, but it is still a rip off." Here here! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beach Party this Sunday. Single women - 50 on the list so far. 90(ish)% will turn up. £40 babysitter (if applicable)LET PARENTS SIT IF AVAILABLE. Outfit £25 NOT NEEDED. Waxing services £20 DO IT YOURSELF OR SHAVE. Haircut/blow dry/colour £20-£80 ONCE IN THE HOT TUB POINTLESS. Cost to get their on their own £5.00-£50 WALK TRAIN BUS TAXI. Room cost £35 (all paid by themselves)DONT STAY OVERNIGHT. Alcohol, condoms, lube etc £15.00 DONT BUY ALCOHOL MAKES YOUR BREATH STINK Total cost between SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED all paid for by themselves Couples - 250 on the list - 85% will turn up. Entrance fee £20.00. £40 babysitter (if applicable). Outfit £25 for her NOT NEEDED AND WHAT NO NEW POSING PANTS FOR HIM THEN?. Waxing services £20 FOR BOTH OR JUST HER? . Haircut/blow dry/colour (her)£20-£80. Cost to get there £5.00-£50. Room cost £35. Alcohol, condoms, lube etc £15.00 Total cost between 2 people £175 - £280. Totals between £90.00 - £140.00 each. Single guy. 140 on list. 30% will turn up. Entrance Fee £30.00. Cost to get their on their own £5.00-£50. Room cost £35 (all paid by themselves). Alcohol, condoms, lube etc £15.00 YOU FORGOT WAXING SEVICE AND ALCOHOL BILL WILL BE MORE PERHAPS £50.00 Total £85 - £130. Now, I KNOW I'm overstating figures and generalising BUT YOU CAN MAKE THESE FIGURES UP ALL NIGHT! So tell me........... who's getting the best deal? " I'll tell you who is getting the best deal....EVERYONE who turns up. Some people get on with having fun, some moan about not having fun. I should think that EVERYONE who attends this weekends event will enjoy themselves considerably....at the end of the day, that is all that matters to MOST. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Serious lack of logical thought by the OP. that law will not help the Clubs, nor will it help the people who visit them. Message to the OP - Be careful what you wish for and remember the law of unintended consequences. This law will not help ANYONE something the OP seem to be incapable of understanding. The entrance cost for single women going up to that of a single male (it will not go the other way)? How is that going to help anyone? one argument seems to be "It's the Law and it must be obeyed" well apparently it is also the law that you can shoot a welshman after dark with your longbow if he is found to be within the confines of Hereford. It is also against the law to play football on a sunday and you can be jailed for being a witch. In some situations some laws are just plain stupid" some think seat belts are..some think using your mobile whilst driving is but they're there for a reason and usually its to protect all including those that think its stupid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Bloody well said Jane. In fact, out of the hundreds that attend, I've yet to hear one person moan about the price. It's still a bloody cheap day and night out." I do get that it seems unfair to blokes, but at all the clubs I've been to, I've never heard a bloke complain about it. I suspect they reckon it's worth it! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" some think seat belts are..some think using your mobile whilst driving is but they're there for a reason and usually its to protect all including those that think its stupid." So how exactly is this law being applied to swingers clubs going to help anyone? FYI there are exemptions for both laws you reference. No seatbelt required for cars over a certain age and delivery van drivers do not have to use them. Phones...hand free sets | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Bloody well said Jane. In fact, out of the hundreds that attend, I've yet to hear one person moan about the price. It's still a bloody cheap day and night out." Just sorry I can't make it, I am sure it will be a resounding success....in the main because the people who attend will be intent on enjoying the event. I won't bother wishing you well....because I am damn sure it will be a top drawer day/night for the organisers and the guests. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Serious lack of logical thought by the OP. Yes it is illegal to discriminate - so what? FACT the vast majority of Swingers Clubs are illegal and breach local planning laws by simply existing. In the eyes of the law a Swingers Club can be closed down as easily as a brothel under the same legislation. Most Clubs also don't sell alcohol - with a few exceptions. In other words many, many Clubs exist at the whim of being in favour of the local Constabulary and nothing more - it is a local issue, no law recognises Swinger Clubs in the UK. This is why so many Clubs in the UK are shabby and squalid compared to European counterparts - owners won't risk large scale investment because of the nature of their tenuous existence. So Mr OP wants equality applied - as the law says it should be. The result will be a total change of dynamics and Clubs that are already borderline on profitability will simply close. - Why - because the ratio of single women, couples and single men will not be able to be maintained. If Clubs could exist on a more transparent basis and have a legally recognised status you may well find Clubs looking imaginatively and creatively at adhering to this law but at the moment - that law will not help the Clubs, nor will it help the people who visit them. Message to the OP - Be careful what you wish for and remember the law of unintended consequences." so just to clarify most clubs are borderline illegal? what does that mean? does that mean they dont have health and safety legislation in place or all the other requirements such as insurance and are only trading at the whim of the local police. also why do you feel that by me pointing out something which you clearly agree is now wrong is not logical. the only reason I can see is that like many others this has nothing to do with the good will you feel towards the clubs but more how you would fit in to the new 'rules'. Simple question why is it clubs still feel they can rip of those people who contribute the highest cost when the laws of the land say No you cant? get used to the fact that at some point it will change..someone will test it and if you think that clubs aren't already coming up with new plans then you are sadly mistaken. whats the saying dont shoot the messenger... dogging bullets left right and centre from people who clearly are not prepared to or have the capability to handle change.. and at least now you know its going to happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Bloody well said Jane. In fact, out of the hundreds that attend, I've yet to hear one person moan about the price. It's still a bloody cheap day and night out. I do get that it seems unfair to blokes, but at all the clubs I've been to, I've never heard a bloke complain about it. I suspect they reckon it's worth it!" I am guessing because they chose to pay it and use the club. I am sure there are lots of men out there who don't use it as they think they are getting a raw deal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The title is misleading, I would be surprised if there's anywhere in the world where single men are not charged a premium or restricted in some way, but different places have different laws or ways of enforcing. why is it misleading? do we not live in Britain? the equality act relates to here.. talk about splitting hairs! lol I think it's misleading because nowhere in your postings are you compared or contrasted the situation in Britain with anywhere else. Had the title been 'rip off swinging clubs' that may have been more accurate. " as some else so eloquently stated we are ripped of in Britain with so many things and this is just one more. Which incidently has legislation in place to stop it and the legislation is for the UK not any where else.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The title is misleading, I would be surprised if there's anywhere in the world where single men are not charged a premium or restricted in some way, but different places have different laws or ways of enforcing. why is it misleading? do we not live in Britain? the equality act relates to here.. talk about splitting hairs! lol I think it's misleading because nowhere in your postings are you compared or contrasted the situation in Britain with anywhere else. Had the title been 'rip off swinging clubs' that may have been more accurate. as some else so eloquently stated we are ripped of in Britain with so many things and this is just one more. Which incidently has legislation in place to stop it and the legislation is for the UK not any where else.." Are you assuming that only the UK has anti discrimination laws?.....you may have to rethink that one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just see that a woman doesn't require a Club to meet any good looking male, couple, female or group to have sex with" True, but it's a great way to spend an evening. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Bloody well said Jane. In fact, out of the hundreds that attend, I've yet to hear one person moan about the price. It's still a bloody cheap day and night out. I do get that it seems unfair to blokes, but at all the clubs I've been to, I've never heard a bloke complain about it. I suspect they reckon it's worth it! I am guessing because they chose to pay it and use the club. I am sure there are lots of men out there who don't use it as they think they are getting a raw deal. " yes of course they choose to pay and I hardly think the topic of conversation once in will be about the charges.. mind and penis on other things! lol one couple here who have commented have said he wont go because she can go for free... And my observation was from the club meets and the cost being shown here on the meets section and the disparity between these and that despite 2010 legislation it is still happening. lets say they equalise the fees,an upside may mean that clubs are fuller every night because you could afford to go more often.. the club environment is a generally regarded as the safe environment for ladies to play in, so are we saying that if they had to pay or even a little more to balance that they would stop going? some may others wouldn't and just maybe those clubs that have been described as shabby could afford to smarten up their establishments making them more appealing. then can offer reduced charges if they are in the minority but for limited times with an understanding the charge will go up..which happens in a lot of other club establishments already..once you're hooked you're in... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The title is misleading, I would be surprised if there's anywhere in the world where single men are not charged a premium or restricted in some way, but different places have different laws or ways of enforcing. why is it misleading? do we not live in Britain? the equality act relates to here.. talk about splitting hairs! lol I think it's misleading because nowhere in your postings are you compared or contrasted the situation in Britain with anywhere else. Had the title been 'rip off swinging clubs' that may have been more accurate. as some else so eloquently stated we are ripped of in Britain with so many things and this is just one more. Which incidently has legislation in place to stop it and the legislation is for the UK not any where else.. Are you assuming that only the UK has anti discrimination laws?.....you may have to rethink that one." oh dear here we go...title has Britain in it...Equality Legislation is for the UK thats Britain... I'm not talking about Europe I don't live there the club meets on here are for the UK meets lets have your next smart comment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" some think seat belts are..some think using your mobile whilst driving is but they're there for a reason and usually its to protect all including those that think its stupid. So how exactly is this law being applied to swingers clubs going to help anyone? FYI there are exemptions for both laws you reference. No seatbelt required for cars over a certain age and delivery van drivers do not have to use them. Phones...hand free sets" yes and there are some exemptions for some types of clubs just not for the vast majority of these ones. but all you have to do is visit the either government site or the human equality site and all will become clear | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Serious lack of logical thought by the OP. Yes it is illegal to discriminate - so what? FACT the vast majority of Swingers Clubs are illegal and breach local planning laws by simply existing. In the eyes of the law a Swingers Club can be closed down as easily as a brothel under the same legislation. Most Clubs also don't sell alcohol - with a few exceptions. In other words many, many Clubs exist at the whim of being in favour of the local Constabulary and nothing more - it is a local issue, no law recognises Swinger Clubs in the UK. This is why so many Clubs in the UK are shabby and squalid compared to European counterparts - owners won't risk large scale investment because of the nature of their tenuous existence. So Mr OP wants equality applied - as the law says it should be. The result will be a total change of dynamics and Clubs that are already borderline on profitability will simply close. - Why - because the ratio of single women, couples and single men will not be able to be maintained. If Clubs could exist on a more transparent basis and have a legally recognised status you may well find Clubs looking imaginatively and creatively at adhering to this law but at the moment - that law will not help the Clubs, nor will it help the people who visit them. Message to the OP - Be careful what you wish for and remember the law of unintended consequences. so just to clarify most clubs are borderline illegal? what does that me does that mean they dont have health and safety legislation in place or all the other requirements such as insurance and are only trading at the whim of the local police. also why do you feel that by me pointing out something which you clearly agree is now wrong is not logical. the only reason I can see is that like many others this has nothing to do with the good will you feel towards the clubs but more how you would fit in to the new 'rules'. Simple question why is it clubs still feel they can rip of those people who contribute the highest cost when the laws of the land say No you cant? get used to the fact that at some point it will change..someone will test it and if you think that clubs aren't already coming up with new plans then you are sadly mistaken. whats the saying dont shoot the messenger... dogging bullets left right and centre from people who clearly are not prepared to or have the capability to handle change.. and at least now you know its going to happen" Can't handle change oh you know everyone who disagrees with your stance personally I see Of course we know it's going to happen Actually haven't read one post that says it won't What I have seen though is the majority say that it's going to be a very bad thing when it does | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The title is misleading, I would be surprised if there's anywhere in the world where single men are not charged a premium or restricted in some way, but different places have different laws or ways of enforcing. why is it misleading? do we not live in Britain? the equality act relates to here.. talk about splitting hairs! lol I think it's misleading because nowhere in your postings are you compared or contrasted the situation in Britain with anywhere else. Had the title been 'rip off swinging clubs' that may have been more accurate. as some else so eloquently stated we are ripped of in Britain with so many things and this is just one more. Which incidently has legislation in place to stop it and the legislation is for the UK not any where else.. Are you assuming that only the UK has anti discrimination laws?.....you may have to rethink that one. oh dear here we go...title has Britain in it...Equality Legislation is for the UK thats Britain... I'm not talking about Europe I don't live there the club meets on here are for the UK meets lets have your next smart comment" You do indeed live in Europe.....we all live under current EU laws on equality, all the UK legislation did was provide add ons to a EU directive that the then incumbent Labour government thought never went far enough. There is an obvious answer to this....if you feel that affected by the supposed inequality on club entry fees....why don't YOU go to a no win no fee solicitor and challenge the clubs in court? It's easy to moan about things, it takes a little bit more effort to do something about things that trouble you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"90 % of women show up? LOL. 90% of the 10 that actually get paid by staff to be there :p Bet successful clubs rely on prostitutes. Not saying that there isn't genuine swinging ladies.. I just see that a woman doesn't require a Club to meet any good looking male, couple, female or group to have sex with" How dare you. You've just labelled the ladies that attend the Beach Party as prostitutes. The ladies that attend Chams do NOT get paid by the club. Other clubs do use this practice but not Chameleons. The 90% that turn up at the Beach Party go because they can, because they enjoy the day that the Posse work so hard to provide, they turn up because we look after each other and they turn up because its a cracking night. So...... before you throw that kind of accusation around, get your facts right. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd really love to put the links on here for you all to peruse at your leisure; and then you can all moan as much as you want to your local MP about how unfair it is that you are now going to be paying the same as everyone else to use your local swinging club! the disgust of it! but its against site rules so why not google and check it out. " Can't speak for anyone else....but I couldn't give a crap if my entry fee changed, so if you don't mind I'll leave all the moaning to you. Thanks anyway | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A House of Lords ruling in the case of Charter v Race Relations Board [1973] decided that a club which not only in theory but also in practice operated a system of proposing and seconding new members, followed by consideration of the acceptability of applications by the club committee, was deemed to be a private members' club. If a club genuinely selects its members on personal grounds (rather than, for example, accepting anyone who will pay a fee) it is a private members' club The Easy way around this for clubs in the UK. Make every new member fill out an application form before they gain entry and attend an 'interview' before gainging entry" clever idea and this happens with golf clubs, however, if you have social events or guests from the general public then you are no longer a private club. i refer you to google golf clubs and the new equality legislation. thats how they hoped to get round allowing ladies to play on the same day and other areas relating to club fees. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"90 % of women show up? LOL. 90% of the 10 that actually get paid by staff to be there :p Bet successful clubs rely on prostitutes. Not saying that there isn't genuine swinging ladies.. I just see that a woman doesn't require a Club to meet any good looking male, couple, female or group to have sex with How dare you. You've just labelled the ladies that attend the Beach Party as prostitutes. The ladies that attend Chams do NOT get paid by the club. Other clubs do use this practice but not Chameleons. The 90% that turn up at the Beach Party go because they can, because they enjoy the day that the Posse work so hard to provide, they turn up because we look after each other and they turn up because its a cracking night. So...... before you throw that kind of accusation around, get your facts right. " To be fair, they could have been talking about any club, just because you mention Chams doesn't mean they are meaning Chams and the social that you organised. Chams runs every other day without your social, same as other clubs....and although I don't know as we don't do clubs, I have heard escorts do get paid to attend clubs ( obviously not naming any even if I knew which ones they were ) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A House of Lords ruling in the case of Charter v Race Relations Board [1973] decided that a club which not only in theory but also in practice operated a system of proposing and seconding new members, followed by consideration of the acceptability of applications by the club committee, was deemed to be a private members' club. If a club genuinely selects its members on personal grounds (rather than, for example, accepting anyone who will pay a fee) it is a private members' club The Easy way around this for clubs in the UK. Make every new member fill out an application form before they gain entry and attend an 'interview' before gainging entry clever idea and this happens with golf clubs, however, if you have social events or guests from the general public then you are no longer a private club. i refer you to google golf clubs and the new equality legislation. thats how they hoped to get round allowing ladies to play on the same day and other areas relating to club fees." actually, as an organiser of social events, this would be very easy to work around also. You would set up a committee to work on behalf of the club (the social organiser) and for each person that wanted to attend, they would have to fill out an application form sent via email. pplications would then be vetted by the committee and successful applicants invited. You will also find that very few clubs in the UK would ever have an open door public day for anyone to wander in or out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Serious lack of logical thought by the OP. Yes it is illegal to discriminate - so what? FACT the vast majority of Swingers Clubs are illegal and breach local planning laws by simply existing. In the eyes of the law a Swingers Club can be closed down as easily as a brothel under the same legislation. Most Clubs also don't sell alcohol - with a few exceptions. In other words many, many Clubs exist at the whim of being in favour of the local Constabulary and nothing more - it is a local issue, no law recognises Swinger Clubs in the UK. This is why so many Clubs in the UK are shabby and squalid compared to European counterparts - owners won't risk large scale investment because of the nature of their tenuous existence. So Mr OP wants equality applied - as the law says it should be. The result will be a total change of dynamics and Clubs that are already borderline on profitability will simply close. - Why - because the ratio of single women, couples and single men will not be able to be maintained. If Clubs could exist on a more transparent basis and have a legally recognised status you may well find Clubs looking imaginatively and creatively at adhering to this law but at the moment - that law will not help the Clubs, nor will it help the people who visit them. Message to the OP - Be careful what you wish for and remember the law of unintended consequences. so just to clarify most clubs are borderline illegal? what does that me does that mean they dont have health and safety legislation in place or all the other requirements such as insurance and are only trading at the whim of the local police. also why do you feel that by me pointing out something which you clearly agree is now wrong is not logical. the only reason I can see is that like many others this has nothing to do with the good will you feel towards the clubs but more how you would fit in to the new 'rules'. Simple question why is it clubs still feel they can rip of those people who contribute the highest cost when the laws of the land say No you cant? get used to the fact that at some point it will change..someone will test it and if you think that clubs aren't already coming up with new plans then you are sadly mistaken. whats the saying dont shoot the messenger... dogging bullets left right and centre from people who clearly are not prepared to or have the capability to handle change.. and at least now you know its going to happen Can't handle change oh you know everyone who disagrees with your stance personally I see Of course we know it's going to happen Actually haven't read one post that says it won't What I have seen though is the majority say that it's going to be a very bad thing when it does" prove it or stop scare mongering..thing is you cant prove it because there is no evidence to back it up.. you're just following the sheep and not looking at the bigger picture. which might mean that the "shabby borderline illegal" clubs go under and we all get to meet and play in nice clean safe and new venues..who have a sound business plan and believe in treating everyone equally | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"90 % of women show up? LOL. 90% of the 10 that actually get paid by staff to be there :p Bet successful clubs rely on prostitutes. Not saying that there isn't genuine swinging ladies.. I just see that a woman doesn't require a Club to meet any good looking male, couple, female or group to have sex with How dare you. You've just labelled the ladies that attend the Beach Party as prostitutes. The ladies that attend Chams do NOT get paid by the club. Other clubs do use this practice but not Chameleons. The 90% that turn up at the Beach Party go because they can, because they enjoy the day that the Posse work so hard to provide, they turn up because we look after each other and they turn up because its a cracking night. So...... before you throw that kind of accusation around, get your facts right. To be fair, they could have been talking about any club, just because you mention Chams doesn't mean they are meaning Chams and the social that you organised. Chams runs every other day without your social, same as other clubs....and although I don't know as we don't do clubs, I have heard escorts do get paid to attend clubs ( obviously not naming any even if I knew which ones they were ) " I specifically ran my post with the heading Beach Party. They picked up on the 90% of the Single Women turning up to that event. Therefore, they were directly accusing the Beach Party of using prostitutes. Sorry Rugby, thats how I see it. As for the clubs that do pay the women, they advertise that fact...... I, however, object that they used my thread to state that 90% of the single women are paid to be there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" which might mean that the "shabby borderline illegal" clubs go under and we all get to meet and play in nice clean safe and new venues..who have a sound business plan and believe in treating everyone equally " You are completely missing the point. Clubs operate under English laws as houses of ill repute. As far as I am aware up to about 2008 there was only one legally recognised Swinging Club in the UK and that was La Chambre. Everyone else is winging it because any complaint at all and the Club Owner can be arrested and the Club shut down under prostitution laws - paying money for sex whether or not it actually takes place. Now if you want to start a campaign - why not campaign for Swingers Cl;ubs to be recognised as a legitimate entity in National law. It is really bizarre that you actually want to see a situation pass whereby Clubs go out of business because they have to abide by the law. No one dispute the law exists but in the current climate and with the current lack of legal status for a Swinger Club you are pointedly aiming to eradicate Clubs from Britain. why not just think laterally instead of black and white. No one disputes the law, but the consequences of adopting it will not help anyone in this lifestyle. I can't post links - but if you search around, you will soon find out just how precarious Clubs are and their lack of legal standing in this country. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"90 % of women show up? LOL. 90% of the 10 that actually get paid by staff to be there :p Bet successful clubs rely on prostitutes. Not saying that there isn't genuine swinging ladies.. I just see that a woman doesn't require a Club to meet any good looking male, couple, female or group to have sex with" Beg your pardon but I'm not a prostitute nor am I paid by the staff but I have gone to all previous socials as a single woman - this is the first time I've gone as part of a couple. I suggest you keep your nasty comments about members to yourself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Op, just a question, have you ever been to a club?" Yes to both socials and normal nights | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am one of the single women that go to clubs. I have several single friends that also go to clubs, this is because they offer security that would perhaps be absent in a mans home and i choose not to host. Neither myself, or all the single gals I know, have any trouble paying my way, including paying to get into clubs. If I had to pay the same price as single men, I would still go. OP, get over yourself mate! Single girls in clubs are not prostitutes. Just confident women having sexy fun." Where have I said singles are pros? I've already said that most ladies would probably pay and some may not. Have you read all the threads because I don't believe you have and you're getting confused? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Have you read all the threads because I don't believe you have and you're getting confused? " Yes and No. I am not confused. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Op, just a question, have you ever been to a club? Yes to both socials and normal nights " So...what do YOU intend to do to redress the balance? Will YOU write to a few solicitors and see if this outragous flouting of our laws can be challenged in a court of law? Or do your protests begin and end on a Swingers site forum? Your thread reminds me somewhat of By-Pass protestors, even if I don't agree with a particular road protest I do have enormous respect for those protestors who clamber up trees and live in them for months on end.... But the old women who stand in the local post office queue and moan about the same proposed By Pass without doing anything constructive? They just make me think....Pffffff! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"[Removed by poster at 26/08/11 22:31:14]" Bet ya wondering what was there lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK, so it's not fair that men have to pay more, but that's TOUGH! No amount of legislation can make me pay to get NSA sex, when I can get it for free sorry but here's another honest answer its all about self self self...any way you cut it" Well guess what, John. I DO have sex because it suits me ("self self self", if you want to call it that). Why the feck would I pay to have sex with a stranger, just because YOU don't understand the difference between the sexes? Take your soapbox onto some Government website, and stop lecturing those of us who enjoy NSA sex! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK, so it's not fair that men have to pay more, but that's TOUGH! No amount of legislation can make me pay to get NSA sex, when I can get it for free " You are not paying to have NSA sex...... You pay to use the clubs facilities, ie. Sauna's, jacuzzi's cinemas, buffets, steam rooms, etc.... Anyone who frequents a club with the sole intention of getting sex needs a reality check and needs to be told what swinging is all about. Or is that the OP's point? Why are single men paying extra when they are not guaranteed a shag? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK, so it's not fair that men have to pay more, but that's TOUGH! No amount of legislation can make me pay to get NSA sex, when I can get it for free sorry but here's another honest answer its all about self self self...any way you cut it Well guess what, John. I DO have sex because it suits me ("self self self", if you want to call it that). Why the feck would I pay to have sex with a stranger, just because YOU don't understand the difference between the sexes? Take your soapbox onto some Government website, and stop lecturing those of us who enjoy NSA sex!" Someone's getting her panties in a twist! So your idea is that you can go to a club and have NSA for free and that shouldn't change and that it's right that men should pay and effectively they are paying to have sex with you? Yes is that correct? Interesting idea, I must say that I thought that clubs were about the social side of swinging and that you're actually paying for the use of the facilities, you know hottub, bar, steam etc etc and the sex is in some way a bi product. So you must be the type of individual who would use your local leisure centre for free while others subsidise you. Nice. I have and do use clubs and have great times there, met some great people and now someone who believes in freebies where everyone else pays for her freebies! Now do you understand self self self? I've never come away from a club and thought hmmm I've payed and not played and I'm paying for all those who are getting in for free and playing or not! The whole point of the thread is obvious to a huge number who've read this and mailed me saying so; that despite new equality legislation men and couples are still subsidising selfish people who want free sex in an establishment that provides facilities at great expense just to satisfy themselves and it would seem who have no thought for any one else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK, so it's not fair that men have to pay more, but that's TOUGH! No amount of legislation can make me pay to get NSA sex, when I can get it for free You are not paying to have NSA sex...... You pay to use the clubs facilities, ie. Sauna's, jacuzzi's cinemas, buffets, steam rooms, etc.... Anyone who frequents a club with the sole intention of getting sex needs a reality check and needs to be told what swinging is all about. Or is that the OP's point? Why are single men paying extra when they are not guaranteed a shag? " Well said and there's no such thing as a guaranteed shag! That's not what swinging clubs are about. there are other 'venues' providing those 'services' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That is why the business model is simply untenable. People are not (or should not) be paying for sex, they are paying to use the facilities. When you seperate the sex element from the debate you also take away the percieved need for a pricing differential. The current model reinforces the impression that guys are paying for sex. Whether you agree or disagree with it, the moment this is challenged in the courts, clubs will change. I fully understand why this is so unpalatable to those who are happy with the status quo. The truth is wherever there is discrimination there are those who benefit from the status quo. I'm no 'campaigner for change', I'm just a realist. I believe when the change eventually happens clubs/venues will simply adapt and the next generation of swingers will simply wonder what all the fuss was about. " Unless the law changes - there will not be any Clubs in the future. At the moment a Club Owner can be prosecuted for taking money off people for entering a house of ill repute - there is currently no legal status for a swingers club so it is - in law - a house of ill repute. As the Clubs already operate on the fringes of the law enforcement of a law that is likely to push them under is hardly likely to be welcomed. Still never mind - lets all push for Clubs to adopt that law and forget all about campaigning for Clubs to be recognised legally, enable Owners to invest with confidence and provide a better environment for everyone. It is beyond my understanding that anyone on this Site would actively promote a law that is likely to get rid of the vast majority of Clubs in this country and simply ignore the fact that a law does not even exist to protect those establishments from random closure threats and notices. Why not push to better recognise your hobby in the eyes of the law instead of promoting a law that is likely to reduce the number of places you can go to indulge in your hobby. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Unless the law changes - there will not be any Clubs in the future. At the moment a Club Owner can be prosecuted for taking money off people for entering a house of ill repute - there is currently no legal status for a swingers club so it is - in law - a house of ill repute. As the Clubs already operate on the fringes of the law enforcement of a law that is likely to push them under is hardly likely to be welcomed. Still never mind - lets all push for Clubs to adopt that law and forget all about campaigning for Clubs to be recognised legally, enable Owners to invest with confidence and provide a better environment for everyone. It is beyond my understanding that anyone on this Site would actively promote a law that is likely to get rid of the vast majority of Clubs in this country and simply ignore the fact that a law does not even exist to protect those establishments from random closure threats and notices. Why not push to better recognise your hobby in the eyes of the law instead of promoting a law that is likely to reduce the number of places you can go to indulge in your hobby." I assure you, I am not 'actively promoting' anything, as I have said I am no campaigner for change, I am however a realist. I also disagree with your view on the general legality of these clubs. As long as there is no inference or intent to 'sell sex', how are these clubs illegal? If I attend my local golf club and decide to have sex with one of the female members 'on site', what is the difference? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I also disagree with your view on the general legality of these clubs. As long as there is no inference or intent to 'sell sex', how are these clubs illegal? If I attend my local golf club and decide to have sex with one of the female members 'on site', what is the difference?" Before you disagree why not do a bit of research? Look at your local licensing categories for a start. As I am sure you know, businesses have to be licensed in one category or another. Let's assume that we want a night club based swingers club so you apply for a nightclub licence - any nudity in the night club risks the Police shutting it down. So maybe a better avenue might be a sauna based Club - next time you go to Chameleons - have a look at the sign as you walk in about sex on the premesis. Fact is that sex is sold by these Clubs - just look at their web sites. A bit of research on the internet amnd you will very soon discover just how tenuous an existence Swingers Clubs have in the UK and if you want further proof - ask the people who own your local Club. We have researched it very well when looking once to open a venue in Manchester city centre. It would have been a pointless exercise investing because no laws or licensing categories existed that would protect us from PC Plod having a bad day, a Journo or other complaining or even local residents. Some Clubs have managed an uneasy working relationship with their local council and Police but no law protects them - just the good will from those who hold the power to have them shut down. Rather bizarrely, Gay Clubs do not have the same difficulties in the eyes of the law. As a hetero couple you can genuinely run the risk of having your wife arrested as a prostitute under current legislation - now that is wrong and if you don't believe me - trust google and research it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" 3. Adopt the 'postive distcrimination' line and thereby proving that as Single females and couples are under represented by 50% or more where single men are members, legally changing their tariffs to entice these under-represented minorities into their clubs. " Black single men enter for free because they are under represented? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" 3. Adopt the 'postive distcrimination' line and thereby proving that as Single females and couples are under represented by 50% or more where single men are members, legally changing their tariffs to entice these under-represented minorities into their clubs. Black single men enter for free because they are under represented? " I wished.... lol but the act covers race so not doable..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The whole point of the thread is obvious to a huge number who've read this and mailed me saying so; that despite new equality legislation men and couples are still subsidising selfish people who want free sex in an establishment that provides facilities at great expense just to satisfy themselves and it would seem who have no thought for any one else." Firstly “huge number”! There are not “huge numbers” who post on the forums and I cannot believe that “huge numbers” who have read your posts, have taken the time to put finger to keyboard in private!!! Judging by your other posts where you have been perhaps, a little churlish and have been perhaps a little disingenuous with people, I suspect that you already know that you sound like Citizen Smith! … Secondly, this is a post about how single men have to pay larger amounts than couples and single fems.. I can’t see where the single fems are selfish at all. Are you trying to tell me that if you were offered something for nothing, you would turn it down? Imagine at work, you were offered a bonus that you knew others weren’t getting although they did the same as you.. You would question it? would you not want it? Perhaps if they were guilty of anything it is accepting the status quo and keeping quiet about a good thing. Don’t get me wrong, I agree and always have that women should be charged for club entry. It is shameful that they can be used by clubs to drag in the guys with brains in their cocks as well as the “proper” single guys. And it is shameful that clubs charge single guys so much for entry. BUT (and there is usually one of those somewhere!) What we have at the moment are clubs who make small amounts of money and provide facilities that we want and although the business model may be flawed, it is all we have! The alternative would definitely be closure for many and restricting entry for all but the best single guys. As I said in a previous post, but it was ignored by you… If you feel this strongly about the subject, grow some balls and do something about it! Three options as I see it. 1. Refuse to go to clubs in protest 2. Take out a legal action against a club 3. Accept it for what it is and pay up! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"found it.... I was reading through the act I have spotted something quite fundermental which is going to protect clubs...... the protected status's in the act are.... disability, gender realignment, Pregnancy and Maternity, race, religion, Sex and Sexual Orientation..... doesn't say anything about marital status though..... therefore if you go as a "couple" and consider yourself to be a "couple", then that isn't covered.... so they can charge couples differently then they can singles....... so from what I read, Technically you can't differently charge single guys and single fems...... or between Couples (MM),Couples (MF) and Couples (FF) However in Clubs CAN still have different rules attached to the different types (so before two single guys decide to test the "couple" thing.... I wouldn't be surprised if they put in a "stay together play together" clause to make people think twice about it......) also under the act you are Allowed to positively discriminate for groups of people that are "under represented" as long as you can show that such measures are useful for redress the balances.... and we all know that people section under-represented at clubs are "single fems".... All a club would have to do is open their books and show that single women are under-represented (or they could put up women prices for a few weeks... show that it affects numbers and put it back down again) if someone really wanted to push it... I am guessing that 99% of clubs would then just go couples only to avoid the arguements..... you all act like single guy prices would come down... the actually likely effect is that single women prices would go up... less of them would go..less couples would then go... and then less single guys would go! " As always Fabio speaks sense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The whole point of the thread is obvious to a huge number who've read this and mailed me saying so; that despite new equality legislation men and couples are still subsidising selfish people who want free sex in an establishment that provides facilities at great expense just to satisfy themselves and it would seem who have no thought for any one else. Firstly “huge number”! There are not “huge numbers” who post on the forums and I cannot believe that “huge numbers” who have read your posts, have taken the time to put finger to keyboard in private!!! Judging by your other posts where you have been perhaps, a little churlish and have been perhaps a little disingenuous with people, I suspect that you already know that you sound like Citizen Smith! … Secondly, this is a post about how single men have to pay larger amounts than couples and single fems.. I can’t see where the single fems are selfish at all. Are you trying to tell me that if you were offered something for nothing, you would turn it down? Imagine at work, you were offered a bonus that you knew others weren’t getting although they did the same as you.. You would question it? would you not want it? Perhaps if they were guilty of anything it is accepting the status quo and keeping quiet about a good thing. Don’t get me wrong, I agree and always have that women should be charged for club entry. It is shameful that they can be used by clubs to drag in the guys with brains in their cocks as well as the “proper” single guys. And it is shameful that clubs charge single guys so much for entry. BUT (and there is usually one of those somewhere!) What we have at the moment are clubs who make small amounts of money and provide facilities that we want and although the business model may be flawed, it is all we have! The alternative would definitely be closure for many and restricting entry for all but the best single guys. As I said in a previous post, but it was ignored by you… If you feel this strongly about the subject, grow some balls and do something about it! Three options as I see it. 1. Refuse to go to clubs in protest 2. Take out a legal action against a club 3. Accept it for what it is and pay up! " I won't stop going to clubs as I enjoy meeting and making new people who enjoy the same and who enjoy the facilities they are paying for. I have said that it will take some one with the brass neck to do it and it looks like from a thread that may be happening. I still will continue to pay as I have been I just hope I'm not subsidising your free NSA sex. Once again it's amazing how someone can start a thread that clearly is a touchy subject and informs you about something which you seem to think is unfair but are more than happy to benefit from and are happy to let others pay for you and your pleasure. My position is clear and as I have said whether you like it or not your current freebie will more than likely stop. Yes some business may close but as others have said they will have to or may have to change their business plans to carry on and that's business. At the end of the day life goes on and I'm sure you will find some where else to get your freebies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The whole point of the thread is obvious to a huge number who've read this and mailed me saying so; that despite new equality legislation men and couples are still subsidising selfish people who want free sex in an establishment that provides facilities at great expense just to satisfy themselves and it would seem who have no thought for any one else. Firstly “huge number”! There are not “huge numbers” who post on the forums and I cannot believe that “huge numbers” who have read your posts, have taken the time to put finger to keyboard in private!!! Judging by your other posts where you have been perhaps, a little churlish and have been perhaps a little disingenuous with people, I suspect that you already know that you sound like Citizen Smith! … Secondly, this is a post about how single men have to pay larger amounts than couples and single fems.. I can’t see where the single fems are selfish at all. Are you trying to tell me that if you were offered something for nothing, you would turn it down? Imagine at work, you were offered a bonus that you knew others weren’t getting although they did the same as you.. You would question it? would you not want it? Perhaps if they were guilty of anything it is accepting the status quo and keeping quiet about a good thing. Don’t get me wrong, I agree and always have that women should be charged for club entry. It is shameful that they can be used by clubs to drag in the guys with brains in their cocks as well as the “proper” single guys. And it is shameful that clubs charge single guys so much for entry. BUT (and there is usually one of those somewhere!) What we have at the moment are clubs who make small amounts of money and provide facilities that we want and although the business model may be flawed, it is all we have! The alternative would definitely be closure for many and restricting entry for all but the best single guys. As I said in a previous post, but it was ignored by you… If you feel this strongly about the subject, grow some balls and do something about it! Three options as I see it. 1. Refuse to go to clubs in protest 2. Take out a legal action against a club 3. Accept it for what it is and pay up! " Forgot to mention not everybody who reads the forums responds on the forums because of the attitude they sometimes see being demonstrated to others! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The admission fees for clubs have always seemed unfiar but they work in my favour so who am i to moan lol " I think thats what is pissing him off. Shame. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The admission fees for clubs have always seemed unfiar but they work in my favour so who am i to moan lol " NN never heard you moan! Except occasionally at chams! lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The admission fees for clubs have always seemed unfiar but they work in my favour so who am i to moan lol I think thats what is pissing him off. Shame. " Oh so true! lol As some else once said " I don't believe it!" lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" 3. Adopt the 'postive distcrimination' line and thereby proving that as Single females and couples are under represented by 50% or more where single men are members, legally changing their tariffs to entice these under-represented minorities into their clubs. Black single men enter for free because they are under represented? I wished.... lol but the act covers race so not doable..... " The act also covers gender. The expensive legal advice I have seen states that this 'loophole' will not work for single women in this instance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Forgot to mention not everybody who reads the forums responds on the forums because of the attitude they sometimes see being demonstrated to others!" What you mean like your attitude? I'm right and everyone else is wrong? Ignoring the posts that you can't argue about and being demeaning to a female by stating ohh do get your knickers in a twist Would your sexist comments stretch to telling a guy not to get his pants in a twist? I think not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |