FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > 'Kinky' women
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" I would class myself as kinky. I've evolved over the years to incorporate various practises into my sex life that I've wanted to try and been lucky enough to find a willing partner to experiment with. Now they have been part of my preferences. I won't compromise any more on going without them. I will however do stuff that are not particularly my thing... in return. Because it's 'give and take' literally in a relationship. Yes I would do certain kinks to keep a man happy that I was in a relationship with but I'd expect the same back. But as far as being kinky for the sake of it to lure a man... no. I'm just being myself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" Is that even possible? Could anyone sustain a lifetime or however long of a sexuality that wasn't their own to keep a partner? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? Is that even possible? Could anyone sustain a lifetime or however long of a sexuality that wasn't their own to keep a partner?" It seems some men think it is .... women revolve around men, apparently their life has no meaning without men?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? Is that even possible? Could anyone sustain a lifetime or however long of a sexuality that wasn't their own to keep a partner? It seems some men think it is .... women revolve around men, apparently their life has no meaning without men?!" Yes, some women think it too. I freely admit that I like having a man in my life, I don't do well emotionally alone. I couldn't pretend to be bisexual for instance to get or keep a man though, I'd rather depend on my miserable face and ratty disposition | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" It is a bit of a loaded question as any part of a relationship could be taken as 'givens' not just kink. Framing kink as a way to capture a guy is a little short sighted in what is achieved by the escapism itself. Would male kink mean that are trying to snare a woman? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? Is that even possible? Could anyone sustain a lifetime or however long of a sexuality that wasn't their own to keep a partner? It seems some men think it is .... women revolve around men, apparently their life has no meaning without men?! Yes, some women think it too. I freely admit that I like having a man in my life, I don't do well emotionally alone. I couldn't pretend to be bisexual for instance to get or keep a man though, I'd rather depend on my miserable face and ratty disposition " I she implication then that only women make compromises because they need the relationship so much, because I think it's pretty even on both sides as men desire relationships too, and also make compromises .... I don't think its a male/female think | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? It is a bit of a loaded question as any part of a relationship could be taken as 'givens' not just kink. Framing kink as a way to capture a guy is a little short sighted in what is achieved by the escapism itself. Would male kink mean that are trying to snare a woman?" You pre empted my comment, see above, but I think the man who triggered the thought was implying that its the needy women who change to get the man and the men are just being themselves .... but I think it could go both ways, if that is the nature of the relationship | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? Is that even possible? Could anyone sustain a lifetime or however long of a sexuality that wasn't their own to keep a partner? It seems some men think it is .... women revolve around men, apparently their life has no meaning without men?! Yes, some women think it too. I freely admit that I like having a man in my life, I don't do well emotionally alone. I couldn't pretend to be bisexual for instance to get or keep a man though, I'd rather depend on my miserable face and ratty disposition I she implication then that only women make compromises because they need the relationship so much, because I think it's pretty even on both sides as men desire relationships too, and also make compromises .... I don't think its a male/female think" It depends on the relationship I suppose. I know that Mr N and I have made compromises to ensure our relationship works but I see relationships where it appears that only one person is compromising. It's a funny old world | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I find girls do alot of things to snare/keep a man or even to try n make others like them and women do things because they want to and seem to know their own self worth...but those terms are to do with attitude more than age...women tend to be alot more secure in themselves " I tend to agree with you there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends wnat you call kinky remeber its only kinky first time " I would, in the nicest way, completely disagree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some that known me for years on here and its sister site, will testify ... I LOVE KINKY side of my sex life - but finding a women who lets go is very very rare " Once again I would politely disagree. I attend events and munches and there are plenty of women who are into kink. Inevitably they are one of a couple and there is treble the amount of men to women. But that is like Fab a function of numbers and not the lack of kinky women. In the usual feast or famine way of things I have introduced two ladies this week to the pleasures of kink. Unfortunately such luck is unlikely to repeat itself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" Very good thought OP I'd like to give my own personal opinion on this subject I myself may differ from most men in the sense that if a woman has to keep doing things that are out of her comfort zone to keep a man happy, how can he honestly be happy with that, I can pick up on things and if a woman is uncomfortable or unsure I stop. I think that a sexual interaction between two or more people should be equally pleasurable for all involved. Sexual chemistry is a must.. but you have to be comfortable as well.. when both of those things sync, kinky may come with it, or... it may not... I think it's important for people to be themselves... not everyone will click... that's just how it is.... and if you don't click, move along to someone that will be able to keep your sexual attention just by being them... Again just an opinion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's kinky? For us we'll do things together that we'll not do with others. Life is for experiencing those wow moments, where sex takes you to new highs. It's also about not being mundane and predictable " It's not about what is or isn't, its about if anyone does it for their partner, to keep or get a partner? Is it a female thing, ie females aren't really kinky at all, or do both sexes do it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's kinky? For us we'll do things together that we'll not do with others. Life is for experiencing those wow moments, where sex takes you to new highs. It's also about not being mundane and predictable It's not about what is or isn't, its about if anyone does it for their partner, to keep or get a partner? Is it a female thing, ie females aren't really kinky at all, or do both sexes do it? " I'd say both sexes do it... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's kinky? For us we'll do things together that we'll not do with others. Life is for experiencing those wow moments, where sex takes you to new highs. It's also about not being mundane and predictable It's not about what is or isn't, its about if anyone does it for their partner, to keep or get a partner? Is it a female thing, ie females aren't really kinky at all, or do both sexes do it? " i think it probably chases more off than attracts, being honest x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's kinky? For us we'll do things together that we'll not do with others. Life is for experiencing those wow moments, where sex takes you to new highs. It's also about not being mundane and predictable It's not about what is or isn't, its about if anyone does it for their partner, to keep or get a partner? Is it a female thing, ie females aren't really kinky at all, or do both sexes do it? i think it probably chases more off than attracts, being honest x" I agree. The poster on the other thread implied women were not really kink and were only doing it to 'trap/secure' a man .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's kinky? For us we'll do things together that we'll not do with others. Life is for experiencing those wow moments, where sex takes you to new highs. It's also about not being mundane and predictable It's not about what is or isn't, its about if anyone does it for their partner, to keep or get a partner? Is it a female thing, ie females aren't really kinky at all, or do both sexes do it? i think it probably chases more off than attracts, being honest x I agree. The poster on the other thread implied women were not really kink and were only doing it to 'trap/secure' a man ...." not all men, like cages, cuffs and a collar | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's kinky? For us we'll do things together that we'll not do with others. Life is for experiencing those wow moments, where sex takes you to new highs. It's also about not being mundane and predictable It's not about what is or isn't, its about if anyone does it for their partner, to keep or get a partner? Is it a female thing, ie females aren't really kinky at all, or do both sexes do it? i think it probably chases more off than attracts, being honest x I agree. The poster on the other thread implied women were not really kink and were only doing it to 'trap/secure' a man ...." That's laughable at best... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" Not seen the thread you mean but I'm certainly not kinky to get a fella....extremely bizarre thought. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? Not seen the thread you mean but I'm certainly not kinky to get a fella....extremely bizarre thought. " this was the quote (if I am allowed to quote another thread here, just because it got me thinking) the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" I guess being a swinger would be considered kinky by many in the world out there If he wanted to try something kinky, depending on how kinky it is, I will do it once. I won't do it again if I don't like it. If he doesn't like that then it is not as if I will show him the door; he knows where the door is; I only whisper to him not to slam it on his way out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? Not seen the thread you mean but I'm certainly not kinky to get a fella....extremely bizarre thought. this was the quote (if I am allowed to quote another thread here, just because it got me thinking) the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. " I see. It would be pointless for me as my kinks are not something I would do with every tom dick and Harry. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? I guess being a swinger would be considered kinky by many in the world out there If he wanted to try something kinky, depending on how kinky it is, I will do it once. I won't do it again if I don't like it. If he doesn't like that then it is not as if I will show him the door; he knows where the door is; I only whisper to him not to slam it on his way out" Bloody hell, my phantom builder slammed it three times today in and out. Not nice when I have been in bed with flu ... so I shouted at him. Result? Ends the job spending three hours cleaning all his rubble up, sweeping, mopping and hovering and the house is as spotless as if my OH had done it .... (he does these chores) ... have I discovered a new man? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? I guess being a swinger would be considered kinky by many in the world out there If he wanted to try something kinky, depending on how kinky it is, I will do it once. I won't do it again if I don't like it. If he doesn't like that then it is not as if I will show him the door; he knows where the door is; I only whisper to him not to slam it on his way out Bloody hell, my phantom builder slammed it three times today in and out. Not nice when I have been in bed with flu ... so I shouted at him. Result? Ends the job spending three hours cleaning all his rubble up, sweeping, mopping and hovering and the house is as spotless as if my OH had done it .... (he does these chores) ... have I discovered a new man?" Send him over; that is the type of kink I like | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" When the statements I make bug people so much they create entire topics of conversation to discuss it...I end up reinforcing my opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not at all. I was with my ex for 11 yrs, he was the most boring person in the bedroom department . I could only let my kink out whilst playing alone. " Was married 13 years Most lazy boring ex husband He needed porn to get going and some viagra ... had a 4 inch cock ... I nearly died inside ... the kinky minx is out now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? When the statements I make bug people so much they create entire topics of conversation to discuss it...I end up reinforcing my opinion." Its not about bugging, its about discussion. Some people learn from them, others don't. Lots of things here trigger discussions and thoughts, but from my point of view it is mainly sweeping statements people make without thinking that I want to explore because I can't honestly believe some people think like that or, in this example, categorise and demean all women like that. I think you will find that most women are claiming their own sexuality for themselves, rather than doing it to please men or snare one ... surely, on balance? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not at all. I was with my ex for 11 yrs, he was the most boring person in the bedroom department . I could only let my kink out whilst playing alone. Was married 13 years Most lazy boring ex husband He needed porn to get going and some viagra ... had a 4 inch cock ... I nearly died inside ... the kinky minx is out now " Another the same here... i was with my ex for 14 years. It all started off good, he indulged my naughtiness, but soon enough it all got dull. Predictive, vanilla, mind-numbingly dull. So as soon as I left him 18 months ago, I rediscovered my love of sex. And now there's no stopping me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not at all. I was with my ex for 11 yrs, he was the most boring person in the bedroom department . I could only let my kink out whilst playing alone. Was married 13 years Most lazy boring ex husband He needed porn to get going and some viagra ... had a 4 inch cock ... I nearly died inside ... the kinky minx is out now Another the same here... i was with my ex for 14 years. It all started off good, he indulged my naughtiness, but soon enough it all got dull. Predictive, vanilla, mind-numbingly dull. So as soon as I left him 18 months ago, I rediscovered my love of sex. And now there's no stopping me " So the solution: don't get married!!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? When the statements I make bug people so much they create entire topics of conversation to discuss it...I end up reinforcing my opinion. Its not about bugging, its about discussion. Some people learn from them, others don't. Lots of things here trigger discussions and thoughts, but from my point of view it is mainly sweeping statements people make without thinking that I want to explore because I can't honestly believe some people think like that or, in this example, categorise and demean all women like that. I think you will find that most women are claiming their own sexuality for themselves, rather than doing it to please men or snare one ... surely, on balance? " You know what triggers discomfort and dwelling on statements? When they touch on the truth. I dont listen to what people say because you'll tend to find most people have absolutely no consistency with what they say and how they behave. I dont really see what is being claimed for oneself. With so many complaints of disrespect and pushy single guys, I dont really see what great realization is being achieved. Plenty of people make sweeping statements with neither context or accuracy. They're often ignored, I notice its the ones which actually breach your own sense of assurance which make people dwell on them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" mine doesn't ...and it never has done.. I am quite capable of being kinky and having kinky thoughts all by myself, I don't need a man to bring out the best (or worst) in me..I can do that all by myself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. " Why are you here? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. " You can have respect and nsa sex though, without having the relationship you are talking about though. I have had a couple of fuck buddy relationships over the years, but it was never going to be any more than that, mainly as they were twenty years younger. I dont understand what you find so wrong with dating someone on the lifestyle? If you are into the scene, then a perfect partner would be too. I was one hundred per cent or nsa sex. I met two three or four men a week on and off for three of four years, in stints, depending when I wanted to my own agenda. That suited me until my Oh came along and we both knew instantly, although neither of us were looking for anything else. I don't think anyone is saying they don't want intimacy, just don't need it from here .... in my humble experience, lots and lots of the men I met wanted some type of controlling relationship and that was the stressful bit. Wanting me at their beck and call, wanting to meet more often, etc .... I feel women are much freer with their relationship choices than men, on the whole. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why are you here?" read the profile, its what its there for | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? When the statements I make bug people so much they create entire topics of conversation to discuss it...I end up reinforcing my opinion. Its not about bugging, its about discussion. Some people learn from them, others don't. Lots of things here trigger discussions and thoughts, but from my point of view it is mainly sweeping statements people make without thinking that I want to explore because I can't honestly believe some people think like that or, in this example, categorise and demean all women like that. I think you will find that most women are claiming their own sexuality for themselves, rather than doing it to please men or snare one ... surely, on balance? You know what triggers discomfort and dwelling on statements? When they touch on the truth. I dont listen to what people say because you'll tend to find most people have absolutely no consistency with what they say and how they behave. I dont really see what is being claimed for oneself. With so many complaints of disrespect and pushy single guys, I dont really see what great realization is being achieved. Plenty of people make sweeping statements with neither context or accuracy. They're often ignored, I notice its the ones which actually breach your own sense of assurance which make people dwell on them." You obviously don't know me and my forum posts. If I see someone making what I think is a ridiculous statement, like women revolve around men, then I will call them on it' I still don't see where you get your evidence from, except it may be you are hoping they do ... my OH can tell you clearly neither of us revolves around the other, its mutual. Its not a personal thing, its just it is such a ridiculous statement. I will always call someone, as I said, but I've been a combination of ill and busy, busy at work and with family so haven't been on here that much .... anyone who wants to agree and say I have argued the toss with them, including politics forum posters, feel free ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why are you here? read the profile, its what its there for" Reading between the lines it seems you are annoyed that you aren't getting what you wanted ... not your profile, because I often see these as less of an indication of a person than the nature of their posts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. You can have respect and nsa sex though, without having the relationship you are talking about though. I have had a couple of fuck buddy relationships over the years, but it was never going to be any more than that, mainly as they were twenty years younger. I dont understand what you find so wrong with dating someone on the lifestyle? If you are into the scene, then a perfect partner would be too. I was one hundred per cent or nsa sex. I met two three or four men a week on and off for three of four years, in stints, depending when I wanted to my own agenda. That suited me until my Oh came along and we both knew instantly, although neither of us were looking for anything else. I don't think anyone is saying they don't want intimacy, just don't need it from here .... in my humble experience, lots and lots of the men I met wanted some type of controlling relationship and that was the stressful bit. Wanting me at their beck and call, wanting to meet more often, etc .... I feel women are much freer with their relationship choices than men, on the whole. " Possession is a big part of many relationships. I just find it unrealistic when people expect to meet their boyfriends on Fab. You're asking for the lottery essentially...a guy who is not possessive enough to be okay with you sleeping with other people and also confident enough to be attractive. Its unrealistic, hence why most couples on here (and singles too) met partners 1. before they came on Fab and 2. have often been dating long before they started swinging. But thats another discussion entirely. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why are you here? read the profile, its what its there for" I'd rather not. It just seems you don't have a very high opinion of women here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. " Why do you believe that there are lots of women looking for relationships? Does it say so on a number of profile you've read? Or have you had a number of women request more than just a sexual relationship with you? I'm feeling your mixing with the wrong people if you're experience is that people are using Fab to find relationships. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why are you here? read the profile, its what its there for Reading between the lines it seems you are annoyed that you aren't getting what you wanted ... not your profile, because I often see these as less of an indication of a person than the nature of their posts. " You're 100% right. I dont get what I want from certain demographics on this site and thus I will vent about those demographics. Everyone is entitled to do the same and hence you have what populates the forum. But, at the same time, I know people like using the "you're not getting any" excuse to shut people down. I think people are right when they say there is a "forum clique", its really just more of a gynocentric mindset which is maintained due to the fact that swinging is a pretty female centric activity. So if we're going that route, lets not because its juvenile. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. You can have respect and nsa sex though, without having the relationship you are talking about though. I have had a couple of fuck buddy relationships over the years, but it was never going to be any more than that, mainly as they were twenty years younger. I dont understand what you find so wrong with dating someone on the lifestyle? If you are into the scene, then a perfect partner would be too. I was one hundred per cent or nsa sex. I met two three or four men a week on and off for three of four years, in stints, depending when I wanted to my own agenda. That suited me until my Oh came along and we both knew instantly, although neither of us were looking for anything else. I don't think anyone is saying they don't want intimacy, just don't need it from here .... in my humble experience, lots and lots of the men I met wanted some type of controlling relationship and that was the stressful bit. Wanting me at their beck and call, wanting to meet more often, etc .... I feel women are much freer with their relationship choices than men, on the whole. Possession is a big part of many relationships. I just find it unrealistic when people expect to meet their boyfriends on Fab. You're asking for the lottery essentially...a guy who is not possessive enough to be okay with you sleeping with other people and also confident enough to be attractive. Its unrealistic, hence why most couples on here (and singles too) met partners 1. before they came on Fab and 2. have often been dating long before they started swinging. But thats another discussion entirely. " I think a lot of people come to the conclusion that the only place you will find someone else on the same sexual level is here (or on the scene). People may not come here looking, but if they are here, this is likely to be the best place to meet someone of a like mind. I think you will also find there are a lot of couples on here who met through swinging. Maybe different from the traditional view of what swinging is .... couples whose relationship has grown tired and need to put a new spring into it, but that is swinging evolved and diversified. Again, your comment is male-centric, 'you' whom ever the 'you' you mean is seeking a guy. Again I would counter men are looking for a woman who can share ... etc. If you find someone where love is mutual, of course what you have is something on an entirely different level than NSA sex, so why should any experience that couple has on here have any impact? Personally I think some of your ideas about swinging and swinging relationships smack of your limited experience of the swinging world | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why are you here? read the profile, its what its there for Reading between the lines it seems you are annoyed that you aren't getting what you wanted ... not your profile, because I often see these as less of an indication of a person than the nature of their posts. You're 100% right. I dont get what I want from certain demographics on this site and thus I will vent about those demographics. Everyone is entitled to do the same and hence you have what populates the forum. But, at the same time, I know people like using the "you're not getting any" excuse to shut people down. I think people are right when they say there is a "forum clique", its really just more of a gynocentric mindset which is maintained due to the fact that swinging is a pretty female centric activity. So if we're going that route, lets not because its juvenile. " I M not part of the forum clique. I have passed most of them off | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why are you here? read the profile, its what its there for Reading between the lines it seems you are annoyed that you aren't getting what you wanted ... not your profile, because I often see these as less of an indication of a person than the nature of their posts. You're 100% right. I dont get what I want from certain demographics on this site and thus I will vent about those demographics. Everyone is entitled to do the same and hence you have what populates the forum. But, at the same time, I know people like using the "you're not getting any" excuse to shut people down. I think people are right when they say there is a "forum clique", its really just more of a gynocentric mindset which is maintained due to the fact that swinging is a pretty female centric activity. So if we're going that route, lets not because its juvenile. I M not part of the forum clique. I have passed most of them off" Pissed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why do you believe that there are lots of women looking for relationships? Does it say so on a number of profile you've read? Or have you had a number of women request more than just a sexual relationship with you? I'm feeling your mixing with the wrong people if you're experience is that people are using Fab to find relationships. Mrs" All of the above. Saying "mixed with the wrong people" doesnt really work as I dont really message any of the people I meet. Also I have never been explicitly been told that "I want a relationship" from anyone...but I put two and two together. When someone wants to meet multiple times (even when the sex was poor) or we just talk in between the action, you start to gain a picture of people, despite what they often SAY they desire seeming like the complete opposite. I have noticed this with EVERY dating/sex site I have used. The men are looking for lots of sexual experience and the women are looking for THE sexual experience. Is this the rule, absolutely not. But there is definitely a correlation. Even among the single women, there is a good chance they have a partner at home who is aware or unaware. As human beings we're strongly driven to desire companionship, swinging doesnt change that. I have found that the sheer amount of people who pose the question of whether swinging and dating works should make it clear that plenty here are still in desire of intimacy. Or maybe I am just projecting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why are you here? read the profile, its what its there for Reading between the lines it seems you are annoyed that you aren't getting what you wanted ... not your profile, because I often see these as less of an indication of a person than the nature of their posts. You're 100% right. I dont get what I want from certain demographics on this site and thus I will vent about those demographics. Everyone is entitled to do the same and hence you have what populates the forum. But, at the same time, I know people like using the "you're not getting any" excuse to shut people down. I think people are right when they say there is a "forum clique", its really just more of a gynocentric mindset which is maintained due to the fact that swinging is a pretty female centric activity. So if we're going that route, lets not because its juvenile. " I've read your profile and what you are looking for. There is absalutely no reason you can't find what you want via Fab. I know of loads of guys with fit body's like yours all having fun in clubs, and getting NSA meets, and not getting mixed up with women wanting relationships. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? Is that even possible? Could anyone sustain a lifetime or however long of a sexuality that wasn't their own to keep a partner? It seems some men think it is .... women revolve around men, apparently their life has no meaning without men?!" pfft! that's a very old fashioned take on it.. what happened to being sexually liberated? I would go so far as to say a lot of men wouldn't get a look in if it wasn't for the fact that their wife or girlfriend was so kinky and knew her own mind in the first place | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Or maybe I am just projecting " What about the women who use Fab to have intimacy without having to have a full time man or be monogamous? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think a lot of people come to the conclusion that the only place you will find someone else on the same sexual level is here (or on the scene). People may not come here looking, but if they are here, this is likely to be the best place to meet someone of a like mind. I think you will also find there are a lot of couples on here who met through swinging. Maybe different from the traditional view of what swinging is .... couples whose relationship has grown tired and need to put a new spring into it, but that is swinging evolved and diversified. Again, your comment is male-centric, 'you' whom ever the 'you' you mean is seeking a guy. Again I would counter men are looking for a woman who can share ... etc. If you find someone where love is mutual, of course what you have is something on an entirely different level than NSA sex, so why should any experience that couple has on here have any impact? Personally I think some of your ideas about swinging and swinging relationships smack of your limited experience of the swinging world" LOL do you think single men here are going to ACTUALLY date the women they sleep with here??? What I find mind boggling is that you seem to have had experiences among black men too. LOL of all the men to expect that from Problem with casual sex in general is that it really doesnt teach you anything about the opposite sex. You experience is not the norm, at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why do you believe that there are lots of women looking for relationships? Does it say so on a number of profile you've read? Or have you had a number of women request more than just a sexual relationship with you? I'm feeling your mixing with the wrong people if you're experience is that people are using Fab to find relationships. Mrs All of the above. Saying "mixed with the wrong people" doesnt really work as I dont really message any of the people I meet. Also I have never been explicitly been told that "I want a relationship" from anyone...but I put two and two together. When someone wants to meet multiple times (even when the sex was poor) or we just talk in between the action, you start to gain a picture of people, despite what they often SAY they desire seeming like the complete opposite. I have noticed this with EVERY dating/sex site I have used. The men are looking for lots of sexual experience and the women are looking for THE sexual experience. Is this the rule, absolutely not. But there is definitely a correlation. Even among the single women, there is a good chance they have a partner at home who is aware or unaware. As human beings we're strongly driven to desire companionship, swinging doesnt change that. I have found that the sheer amount of people who pose the question of whether swinging and dating works should make it clear that plenty here are still in desire of intimacy. Or maybe I am just projecting " I have to make a confession here. When I met men as a single woman, I told them what I knew they wanted to hear, so that I could get what I wanted. So, if I wanted to meet once and not again, I would act clingy .... then they'd be gone, thinking it was their idea. Meet multiple times? Both fuck buddies and I would go to cinema and footie games .... hmmm, now you have got me thinking. There was me thinking it was because I liked footie and they just tagged along because I always get in free ... I dont think you give people credit for being as emotionally intelligent as you are | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand the premise? Men are naturally kinky but women aren't? Don't women do pretty well writing books of filth for other women?" Men are filthier than women...its just Do people really think otherwise?? With testosterone and all?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think you give people credit for being as emotionally intelligent as you are" Yes, because they're not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think a lot of people come to the conclusion that the only place you will find someone else on the same sexual level is here (or on the scene). People may not come here looking, but if they are here, this is likely to be the best place to meet someone of a like mind. I think you will also find there are a lot of couples on here who met through swinging. Maybe different from the traditional view of what swinging is .... couples whose relationship has grown tired and need to put a new spring into it, but that is swinging evolved and diversified. Again, your comment is male-centric, 'you' whom ever the 'you' you mean is seeking a guy. Again I would counter men are looking for a woman who can share ... etc. If you find someone where love is mutual, of course what you have is something on an entirely different level than NSA sex, so why should any experience that couple has on here have any impact? Personally I think some of your ideas about swinging and swinging relationships smack of your limited experience of the swinging world LOL do you think single men here are going to ACTUALLY date the women they sleep with here??? What I find mind boggling is that you seem to have had experiences among black men too. LOL of all the men to expect that from Problem with casual sex in general is that it really doesnt teach you anything about the opposite sex. You experience is not the norm, at all. " All with black men, yes .... and there are also many, many black men who hate the bi aspect of their sexuality so much that they dare not admit to it, to the extent that myself and my OH were shocked at how many well hung young black guys there were at a recent tgirl party we went to ... I have been dating and swinging with black guys for almost twenty years, and have my own sons, so I feel I have some experience for sure | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Adding to that. YES, ALOT of people here are looking for relationships. What blows my mind is that if your type into the search function "can you date someone on fab", you're presented with a litany of threads pertaining to the subject. Literally pages of them. And then, at the same time, these people will sit and pretend they're evolved modernists who dont require intimacy. Its all transparent as hell. Maybe we have outliers on this forum, but considering the amount of hoop jumping that comes with single meets and the fact every other threads seems to be complaining about "respect" or "being subject to treatment like a hooker" you have to really ask yourself whether people here are really, truly about NSA sex. Why do you believe that there are lots of women looking for relationships? Does it say so on a number of profile you've read? Or have you had a number of women request more than just a sexual relationship with you? I'm feeling your mixing with the wrong people if you're experience is that people are using Fab to find relationships. Mrs All of the above. Saying "mixed with the wrong people" doesnt really work as I dont really message any of the people I meet. Also I have never been explicitly been told that "I want a relationship" from anyone...but I put two and two together. When someone wants to meet multiple times (even when the sex was poor) or we just talk in between the action, you start to gain a picture of people, despite what they often SAY they desire seeming like the complete opposite. I have noticed this with EVERY dating/sex site I have used. The men are looking for lots of sexual experience and the women are looking for THE sexual experience. Is this the rule, absolutely not. But there is definitely a correlation. Even among the single women, there is a good chance they have a partner at home who is aware or unaware. As human beings we're strongly driven to desire companionship, swinging doesnt change that. I have found that the sheer amount of people who pose the question of whether swinging and dating works should make it clear that plenty here are still in desire of intimacy. Or maybe I am just projecting " Wanting to meet multiple times is not a sign of a woman wanting a relationship. It's a sign that a woman wants more sex from that person. I have about half a dozen men that I play with on mulitiple occasions, either on my own, with my husband or as part of a larger group. I would find it bizarre beyond belief if any of them though I was looking for a relationship simply because I want to play with them regularly. If you only want one night stands maybe you should specify that on your profile, then you are less likely to have women bugging you for a second fuck. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand the premise? Men are naturally kinky but women aren't? Don't women do pretty well writing books of filth for other women? Men are filthier than women...its just Do people really think otherwise?? With testosterone and all??" Kink requires imagination as well as sexual drive. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" To get a man? Nah but I know being Kinky attracts a lot of women to me...and on a very regular basis. But i don't do it for others I do it because that's who I am | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think a lot of people come to the conclusion that the only place you will find someone else on the same sexual level is here (or on the scene). People may not come here looking, but if they are here, this is likely to be the best place to meet someone of a like mind. I think you will also find there are a lot of couples on here who met through swinging. Maybe different from the traditional view of what swinging is .... couples whose relationship has grown tired and need to put a new spring into it, but that is swinging evolved and diversified. Again, your comment is male-centric, 'you' whom ever the 'you' you mean is seeking a guy. Again I would counter men are looking for a woman who can share ... etc. If you find someone where love is mutual, of course what you have is something on an entirely different level than NSA sex, so why should any experience that couple has on here have any impact? Personally I think some of your ideas about swinging and swinging relationships smack of your limited experience of the swinging world LOL do you think single men here are going to ACTUALLY date the women they sleep with here??? What I find mind boggling is that you seem to have had experiences among black men too. LOL of all the men to expect that from Problem with casual sex in general is that it really doesnt teach you anything about the opposite sex. You experience is not the norm, at all. All with black men, yes .... and there are also many, many black men who hate the bi aspect of their sexuality so much that they dare not admit to it, to the extent that myself and my OH were shocked at how many well hung young black guys there were at a recent tgirl party we went to ... I have been dating and swinging with black guys for almost twenty years, and have my own sons, so I feel I have some experience for sure" What does this have to do with my point? Even if it is true (and it is) I love the way that was the tangent you went down. Even if there are black guys who are bisexual without admitting it, this is once again not the norm (LGBT account for 5-8% of the population at best). Dont take your outliers as the rule. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Wanting to meet multiple times is not a sign of a woman wanting a relationship. It's a sign that a woman wants more sex from that person." You didnt read what I wrote. At all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"LOL do you think single men here are going to ACTUALLY date the women they sleep with here???" It does happen and lots of couples met on here. You've got a poor opinion of women on here perhaps? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think a lot of people come to the conclusion that the only place you will find someone else on the same sexual level is here (or on the scene). People may not come here looking, but if they are here, this is likely to be the best place to meet someone of a like mind. I think you will also find there are a lot of couples on here who met through swinging. Maybe different from the traditional view of what swinging is .... couples whose relationship has grown tired and need to put a new spring into it, but that is swinging evolved and diversified. Again, your comment is male-centric, 'you' whom ever the 'you' you mean is seeking a guy. Again I would counter men are looking for a woman who can share ... etc. If you find someone where love is mutual, of course what you have is something on an entirely different level than NSA sex, so why should any experience that couple has on here have any impact? Personally I think some of your ideas about swinging and swinging relationships smack of your limited experience of the swinging world LOL do you think single men here are going to ACTUALLY date the women they sleep with here??? What I find mind boggling is that you seem to have had experiences among black men too. LOL of all the men to expect that from Problem with casual sex in general is that it really doesnt teach you anything about the opposite sex. You experience is not the norm, at all. All with black men, yes .... and there are also many, many black men who hate the bi aspect of their sexuality so much that they dare not admit to it, to the extent that myself and my OH were shocked at how many well hung young black guys there were at a recent tgirl party we went to ... I have been dating and swinging with black guys for almost twenty years, and have my own sons, so I feel I have some experience for sure What does this have to do with my point? Even if it is true (and it is) I love the way that was the tangent you went down. Even if there are black guys who are bisexual without admitting it, this is once again not the norm (LGBT account for 5-8% of the population at best). Dont take your outliers as the rule. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I know you love that use of the word 'outliers' but have you ever considered that you are indeed referring to your experiences here. The fact that we have been around swinging a lot longer and have more life experience and give an example as one way of showing how the reality you see may not indeed be what is really going on. I see you have limited experience, and to be honest, it shows .... men do indeed date and fall in love with women they meet on the scene, why wouldn't they? Unless they had outdated and misogynistic views about women and their sexuality ... and I am talking about black men here too. Some men wouldn't consider dating women they meet here, but I would not consider these men 'swingers' nor as men who respect women. Its a phase their are going through and they will pass through. I am not disillusioned and have no need to be. I am not seeking a man or a relationship, so don't need the validation. I think you are putting it across that you see all women as needy and dependent which is likely to mean even less will be interested in you ... or at least the ones you will attract will reinforce your beliefs. Do you get out on the scene that much? " I see you have simply veered into shaming tactics and claims of "misogyny". My expectations simply differ to yours, in 20 years you still have not reealized this. You also have not realized that the vast majority of the guys you meet (very likely "bulls") have absolutely zero intention of dating the women they have sex with on here. Are their those who defy the norm? Of course, but the difference I am not delusional enough to use them as some kind of barometer as to what to expect of the behaviors of the people here. You can, of course, keep pretending to yourself that there are plenty of guys just clawing at the chance to find relationships on fab, that half of the black population on here are secret bisexuals, that because I engage in debate with you then it somehow translates to remote sexual interest in you. If it makes you feel better. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Thought you might be up for a discussion, but its not about that is it? " But...it is? Isnt that the definition of a forum?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I know you love that use of the word 'outliers' but have you ever considered that you are indeed referring to your experiences here. The fact that we have been around swinging a lot longer and have more life experience and give an example as one way of showing how the reality you see may not indeed be what is really going on. I see you have limited experience, and to be honest, it shows .... men do indeed date and fall in love with women they meet on the scene, why wouldn't they? Unless they had outdated and misogynistic views about women and their sexuality ... and I am talking about black men here too. Some men wouldn't consider dating women they meet here, but I would not consider these men 'swingers' nor as men who respect women. Its a phase their are going through and they will pass through. I am not disillusioned and have no need to be. I am not seeking a man or a relationship, so don't need the validation. I think you are putting it across that you see all women as needy and dependent which is likely to mean even less will be interested in you ... or at least the ones you will attract will reinforce your beliefs. Do you get out on the scene that much? I see you have simply veered into shaming tactics and claims of "misogyny". My expectations simply differ to yours, in 20 years you still have not reealized this. You also have not realized that the vast majority of the guys you meet (very likely "bulls") have absolutely zero intention of dating the women they have sex with on here. Are their those who defy the norm? Of course, but the difference I am not delusional enough to use them as some kind of barometer as to what to expect of the behaviors of the people here. You can, of course, keep pretending to yourself that there are plenty of guys just clawing at the chance to find relationships on fab, that half of the black population on here are secret bisexuals, that because I engage in debate with you then it somehow translates to remote sexual interest in you. If it makes you feel better. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"LOL do you think single men here are going to ACTUALLY date the women they sleep with here??? It does happen and lots of couples met on here. You've got a poor opinion of women on here perhaps?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you .... apparently we are all delusional though .... And need to convince ourselves of the fact that all men want us I don't even want another man...." We must be then if he says so. Funny how I had a 44 part thread about matchmaking and there were an awful lot of men on it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you .... apparently we are all delusional though .... And need to convince ourselves of the fact that all men want us I don't even want another man.... We must be then if he says so. Funny how I had a 44 part thread about matchmaking and there were an awful lot of men on it " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you .... apparently we are all delusional though .... And need to convince ourselves of the fact that all men want us I don't even want another man.... We must be then if he says so. Funny how I had a 44 part thread about matchmaking and there were an awful lot of men on it " I am delusional I met my boyfriend from here last year Neither one of us was looking for a relationship, but it happened nevertheless He is delusional too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh yeah, you reminded me, I did one in London and it had mainly men on it. I like discussion, but not when it gets dominated by two people so prefer others to join in. Apparently we are all deluded females in dire need of such relay men who wouldn't touch us with a barge pole in real life .... hmmm, how many meets will come off the back of that? " Not everyone is in the forums and a lot of women like the gym physique and ignore the personality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you .... apparently we are all delusional though .... And need to convince ourselves of the fact that all men want us I don't even want another man.... We must be then if he says so. Funny how I had a 44 part thread about matchmaking and there were an awful lot of men on it I am delusional I met my boyfriend from here last year Neither one of us was looking for a relationship, but it happened nevertheless He is delusional too " I dated someone off here for 18 months. His idea and I dumped him | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you .... apparently we are all delusional though .... And need to convince ourselves of the fact that all men want us I don't even want another man.... We must be then if he says so. Funny how I had a 44 part thread about matchmaking and there were an awful lot of men on it I am delusional I met my boyfriend from here last year Neither one of us was looking for a relationship, but it happened nevertheless He is delusional too I dated someone off here for 18 months. His idea and I dumped him " Whaaaat? You, a mere woman, dumping a man; such things are unheard of in the 18th century | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would one not date someone from Fab? Confused..." Because to do so would be delusional I think he said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dated someone off here for 18 months. His idea and I dumped him Whaaaat? You, a mere woman, dumping a man; such things are unheard of in the 18th century" I know, twas such shame brought upon the family and all | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Wanting to meet multiple times is not a sign of a woman wanting a relationship. It's a sign that a woman wants more sex from that person. You didnt read what I wrote. At all." I most certainly did read what you said. This is what you said "When someone wants to meet multiple times (even when the sex was poor) or we just talk in between the action, you start to gain a picture of people, despite what they often SAY they desire seeming like the complete opposite." I shortened it, but basically said this behaviour from women does not mean they want a relationship. Talking in between action and you get a picture of what exactly? That's normal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thank you .... apparently we are all delusional though .... And need to convince ourselves of the fact that all men want us I don't even want another man.... We must be then if he says so. Funny how I had a 44 part thread about matchmaking and there were an awful lot of men on it I am delusional I met my boyfriend from here last year Neither one of us was looking for a relationship, but it happened nevertheless He is delusional too " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand the premise? Men are naturally kinky but women aren't? Don't women do pretty well writing books of filth for other women? Men are filthier than women...its just Do people really think otherwise?? With testosterone and all??" men may be filthier but women are kinkier...fact | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I shortened it, but basically said this behaviour from women does not mean they want a relationship. Talking in between action and you get a picture of what exactly? That's normal. " You're qualifying it now. Yes, someones behavior lends me to believe they're looking for a relationship. No, it doesnt simply mean them wanting a second meet automatically meaning they want something serious...but then I never really implied that either. By "talking in between the action", people will often give me an insight into their lives. I doesnt take me long to put togetehr that what they're really after is something substantial, that doesnt mean it has to be something exclusive...but, ultimately, they want something intimate. Essentially, the freedom to fuck other men with a guy who will still consider them a girlfriend/wife/whatever. Its an unrealistic expectation...precisely because possession and sexual exclusivity tend to define the early stages of a relationship. ESPECIALLY for men. If one thinks that this is NOT the way most men think then yes, they're severely delusional. But this forum shows me that there are clearly alot of delusional people on here. As said, those who seem to think because they fuck men, it means they get them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand the premise? Men are naturally kinky but women aren't? Don't women do pretty well writing books of filth for other women? Men are filthier than women...its just Do people really think otherwise?? With testosterone and all?? men may be filthier but women are kinkier...fact" I kinda agree. Kinda. But then when I start to gain insight into the sexual desires of the male partners I have and the female, the men always take the cake on sheer "deviation". Why? Because a lot of "kinkiness" may actually be paraphilias which are symptoms of sexual obsession...paraphilias are way more common in men than in women. By some distance. Plenty of scientific evidence for this too. I tend to think women are more fluid, more willing to explore unchartered sexual territory with a partner they're attracted to. Whereas, most women will tell me that if they're into pegging, and had an ex who was into it, it'll be quite a challenge to find another guy who also has the same proclivities, especially if he is not submissive in bed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" As said, those who seem to think because they fuck men, it means they get them. " Works the other way too. Unless you don't meet women? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Its an unrealistic expectation...precisely because possession and sexual exclusivity tend to define the early stages of a relationship. ESPECIALLY for men. " Really? Really ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" I'm doing nothing to get no one :/ I've learnt that I can be me and the better the connection the better I am! And as for kinky....well what I think is you may not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" As said, those who seem to think because they fuck men, it means they get them. Works the other way too. Unless you don't meet women?" of course it does | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Neanderthals may have a need to possess. 21st century man moved on with the times The more intelligent he became, the more he realised that women these days, don't need him for sex or for financial support. Being clever, he realised quickly that providing her with a stable relationship will get him what he desires most; a constant supply of f**ks " 21st century man... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Its an unrealistic expectation...precisely because possession and sexual exclusivity tend to define the early stages of a relationship. ESPECIALLY for men. Really? Really ? " You sound like a sycophant. I dont value your opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" As said, those who seem to think because they fuck men, it means they get them. Works the other way too. Unless you don't meet women? of course it does" So at 27 you know how ALL women work? Yet those of us who've had several relationships with men, some over 20 years long, know nothing about men. If you want to call anyone delusional it should be yourself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I shortened it, but basically said this behaviour from women does not mean they want a relationship. Talking in between action and you get a picture of what exactly? That's normal. You're qualifying it now. Yes, someones behavior lends me to believe they're looking for a relationship. No, it doesnt simply mean them wanting a second meet automatically meaning they want something serious...but then I never really implied that either. By "talking in between the action", people will often give me an insight into their lives. I doesnt take me long to put togetehr that what they're really after is something substantial, that doesnt mean it has to be something exclusive...but, ultimately, they want something intimate. Essentially, the freedom to fuck other men with a guy who will still consider them a girlfriend/wife/whatever. Its an unrealistic expectation...precisely because possession and sexual exclusivity tend to define the early stages of a relationship. ESPECIALLY for men. If one thinks that this is NOT the way most men think then yes, they're severely delusional. But this forum shows me that there are clearly alot of delusional people on here. As said, those who seem to think because they fuck men, it means they get them. " So you feel that an intimate conversation in between action suggests they want something more substancial? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry, just getting my hair and makeup done before the male comes home ...." Don't forget to bat your eyelids, act all demure and helpless | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I shortened it, but basically said this behaviour from women does not mean they want a relationship. Talking in between action and you get a picture of what exactly? That's normal. You're qualifying it now. Yes, someones behavior lends me to believe they're looking for a relationship. No, it doesnt simply mean them wanting a second meet automatically meaning they want something serious...but then I never really implied that either. By "talking in between the action", people will often give me an insight into their lives. I doesnt take me long to put togetehr that what they're really after is something substantial, that doesnt mean it has to be something exclusive...but, ultimately, they want something intimate. Essentially, the freedom to fuck other men with a guy who will still consider them a girlfriend/wife/whatever. Its an unrealistic expectation...precisely because possession and sexual exclusivity tend to define the early stages of a relationship. ESPECIALLY for men. If one thinks that this is NOT the way most men think then yes, they're severely delusional. But this forum shows me that there are clearly alot of delusional people on here. As said, those who seem to think because they fuck men, it means they get them. So you feel that an intimate conversation in between action suggests they want something more substancial? " No. Perhaps, I didnt word it well. I mean people will tell me about their lives or their other experiences and I deduce that they likely want a relationship. Its not about myself, it could be with whoever they deem most compatible...but, ultimately they want something more than what they claim. What does kinda blow my mind is the fact that what I am saying not exactly unsubstantiated opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not at all. I was with my ex for 11 yrs, he was the most boring person in the bedroom department . I could only let my kink out whilst playing alone. " Did you atleast try new things to spice up the relationship. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"and I deduce that they likely want a relationship. " But you might be wrong, you might assume every woman is helpless and desperate for a man. Your deductions/assumptions might be wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"and I deduce that they likely want a relationship. But you might be wrong, you might assume every woman is helpless and desperate for a man. Your deductions/assumptions might be wrong." They are playing you. Take it from me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would hope that nobody of any gender does things sexually just to keep their partner happy. I know plenty of very kinky women who are that way regardless of who is their partner, or whether they have a partner at a given time. Some people are kinky, some dabble, some discover it later in life, and some are not kinky. I sincerely hope that nobody ever does kinky things just to keep a person in their life. That strikes me as rather sad." This.... so much | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I shortened it, but basically said this behaviour from women does not mean they want a relationship. Talking in between action and you get a picture of what exactly? That's normal. You're qualifying it now. Yes, someones behavior lends me to believe they're looking for a relationship. No, it doesnt simply mean them wanting a second meet automatically meaning they want something serious...but then I never really implied that either. By "talking in between the action", people will often give me an insight into their lives. I doesnt take me long to put togetehr that what they're really after is something substantial, that doesnt mean it has to be something exclusive...but, ultimately, they want something intimate. Essentially, the freedom to fuck other men with a guy who will still consider them a girlfriend/wife/whatever. Its an unrealistic expectation...precisely because possession and sexual exclusivity tend to define the early stages of a relationship. ESPECIALLY for men. If one thinks that this is NOT the way most men think then yes, they're severely delusional. But this forum shows me that there are clearly alot of delusional people on here. As said, those who seem to think because they fuck men, it means they get them. So you feel that an intimate conversation in between action suggests they want something more substancial? No. Perhaps, I didnt word it well. I mean people will tell me about their lives or their other experiences and I deduce that they likely want a relationship. Its not about myself, it could be with whoever they deem most compatible...but, ultimately they want something more than what they claim. What does kinda blow my mind is the fact that what I am saying not exactly unsubstantiated opinion. " I would worry if they text you every other day after the event, and start questioning you about your other conquests and getting possessive. But I don't think you should deduce that a bit of personal chat particularly means anything. And people talk a hell of a lot of crap when caught in a moment of passion. Then it's out of sight out mind until next time. Just enjoy the experience for what it's worth, and don't worry about these things. As you said nobody has actually done anything specific to suggest they want a relationship. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Its an unrealistic expectation...precisely because possession and sexual exclusivity tend to define the early stages of a relationship. ESPECIALLY for men. Really? Really ? You sound like a sycophant. I dont value your opinion." So who's opinion do you value? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are lots of reasons women do this. To put the man at ease .... to be generally chatty. For goodness sake, one of my fuck buddies said he wanted to have a child with me .... but I didn't take him seriously. I chat shit to people like that on meets, I tell people 'personal' stuff that works at the time. You really have to get over yourself, thinking everyone wants a relationship with you .... " From these posts it seems that you lie...alot. Thats not healthy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are lots of reasons women do this. To put the man at ease .... to be generally chatty. For goodness sake, one of my fuck buddies said he wanted to have a child with me .... but I didn't take him seriously. I chat shit to people like that on meets, I tell people 'personal' stuff that works at the time. You really have to get over yourself, thinking everyone wants a relationship with you .... From these posts it seems that you lie...alot. Thats not healthy." Just like classy said, its sex talk ... why not when its nsa., why not have a go and get personal with someone else now, not just me, or my OH will get jealous | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are lots of reasons women do this. To put the man at ease .... to be generally chatty. For goodness sake, one of my fuck buddies said he wanted to have a child with me .... but I didn't take him seriously. I chat shit to people like that on meets, I tell people 'personal' stuff that works at the time. You really have to get over yourself, thinking everyone wants a relationship with you .... " Yeah I had a guy tell me he was going to breed me. Did I believe him? Course I didn't! My main playmate often tells me that he loves me in the moment of passion. Then I don't hear from him for yonks and we both pursue fun with other playmates. I'm not supposed to believe this stuff! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man?" Been single 17yrs Can't have a man around me do my head In But I have needs and a man for a few hours now and again is fine, couldn't live with one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would worry if they text you every other day after the event, and start questioning you about your other conquests and getting possessive. But I don't think you should deduce that a bit of personal chat particularly means anything. And people talk a hell of a lot of crap when caught in a moment of passion. Then it's out of sight out mind until next time. Just enjoy the experience for what it's worth, and don't worry about these things. As you said nobody has actually done anything specific to suggest they want a relationship." I actually think the opposite. The bedroom is where honesty truly resides. Hence how alot of the race related expectations or desire mentioned here...would NEVER be mentioned by the same people in public. Besides, when someone is telling me they love meeting multiple different guys ever week and then also tell me that they're on anti-depresssants and suffering distinct bouts of loneliness...I often ask whether their lifestyle may really be whats best for them. Of course, I wont judge...but I have had it alot. Keep in mind, these women never told me that they actually wanted relationships. Never. But it was clear they were not happy with their love lives, any remotely clairvoyant individual could deduce it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would worry if they text you every other day after the event, and start questioning you about your other conquests and getting possessive. But I don't think you should deduce that a bit of personal chat particularly means anything. And people talk a hell of a lot of crap when caught in a moment of passion. Then it's out of sight out mind until next time. Just enjoy the experience for what it's worth, and don't worry about these things. As you said nobody has actually done anything specific to suggest they want a relationship. I actually think the opposite. The bedroom is where honesty truly resides. Hence how alot of the race related expectations or desire mentioned here...would NEVER be mentioned by the same people in public. Besides, when someone is telling me they love meeting multiple different guys ever week and then also tell me that they're on anti-depresssants and suffering distinct bouts of loneliness...I often ask whether their lifestyle may really be whats best for them. Of course, I wont judge...but I have had it alot. Keep in mind, these women never told me that they actually wanted relationships. Never. But it was clear they were not happy with their love lives, any remotely clairvoyant individual could deduce it. " I would say it wouldn't be a relationship that solves mental health issues ... let alone one with someone from a swinging site. Depression and or loneliness can't be cured by a relationship, even with a 'perfect' man. I think I am going to give up on this one .... it's not going in ... in twenty years maybe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are lots of reasons women do this. To put the man at ease .... to be generally chatty. For goodness sake, one of my fuck buddies said he wanted to have a child with me .... but I didn't take him seriously. I chat shit to people like that on meets, I tell people 'personal' stuff that works at the time. You really have to get over yourself, thinking everyone wants a relationship with you .... From these posts it seems that you lie...alot. Thats not healthy. Just like classy said, its sex talk ... why not when its nsa., why not have a go and get personal with someone else now, not just me, or my OH will get jealous" There is "sex talk" and lying, you're doing the latter. Even from your posts here, you genuinely seem kinda all over the place. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would worry if they text you every other day after the event, and start questioning you about your other conquests and getting possessive. But I don't think you should deduce that a bit of personal chat particularly means anything. And people talk a hell of a lot of crap when caught in a moment of passion. Then it's out of sight out mind until next time. Just enjoy the experience for what it's worth, and don't worry about these things. As you said nobody has actually done anything specific to suggest they want a relationship. I actually think the opposite. The bedroom is where honesty truly resides. Hence how alot of the race related expectations or desire mentioned here...would NEVER be mentioned by the same people in public. Besides, when someone is telling me they love meeting multiple different guys ever week and then also tell me that they're on anti-depresssants and suffering distinct bouts of loneliness...I often ask whether their lifestyle may really be whats best for them. Of course, I wont judge...but I have had it alot. Keep in mind, these women never told me that they actually wanted relationships. Never. But it was clear they were not happy with their love lives, any remotely clairvoyant individual could deduce it. " That's true. That is a bit too personal, and reasonable to deduce they might have issues that need resolving. I don't think that's reflective of the swing scene though, or reason to believe that women on Fab are looking for relationships. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are lots of reasons women do this. To put the man at ease .... to be generally chatty. For goodness sake, one of my fuck buddies said he wanted to have a child with me .... but I didn't take him seriously. I chat shit to people like that on meets, I tell people 'personal' stuff that works at the time. You really have to get over yourself, thinking everyone wants a relationship with you .... From these posts it seems that you lie...alot. Thats not healthy. Just like classy said, its sex talk ... why not when its nsa., why not have a go and get personal with someone else now, not just me, or my OH will get jealous There is "sex talk" and lying, you're doing the latter. Even from your posts here, you genuinely seem kinda all over the place." Okay, is that you getting personal again? I am not, trust me. I am not lonely, needy, depressed or hungry for the attention of a man. I am just ill in bed with a cold and chest infection and forbidden to leave the house so bored. I always like a good discussion, as those who have met me will attest .... getting personal wont help your cause, whatever it is, people know my posts and my opinions on most things. I don't get intimidated by men trying to pull the emotional card ... remember, I eat bulls for breakfast | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would worry if they text you every other day after the event, and start questioning you about your other conquests and getting possessive. But I don't think you should deduce that a bit of personal chat particularly means anything. And people talk a hell of a lot of crap when caught in a moment of passion. Then it's out of sight out mind until next time. Just enjoy the experience for what it's worth, and don't worry about these things. As you said nobody has actually done anything specific to suggest they want a relationship. I actually think the opposite. The bedroom is where honesty truly resides. Hence how alot of the race related expectations or desire mentioned here...would NEVER be mentioned by the same people in public. Besides, when someone is telling me they love meeting multiple different guys ever week and then also tell me that they're on anti-depresssants and suffering distinct bouts of loneliness...I often ask whether their lifestyle may really be whats best for them. Of course, I wont judge...but I have had it alot. Keep in mind, these women never told me that they actually wanted relationships. Never. But it was clear they were not happy with their love lives, any remotely clairvoyant individual could deduce it. I would say it wouldn't be a relationship that solves mental health issues ... let alone one with someone from a swinging site. Depression and or loneliness can't be cured by a relationship, even with a 'perfect' man. I think I am going to give up on this one .... it's not going in ... in twenty years maybe" You're right, they dont. But there is a marked correlation between companionship and mental health. We're social creatures and thus we need social inclusion to be healthy. This is just...fact. No, a love life wont cure mental issues, but I wont pretend for a second that seeking multiple different partners ad nauseum has an affect on ones mind, especially in women. Hence why I tend to find I read profiles and most tend to claim they value "quality over quantity". Also age is no sign of intelligence or wisdom, plenty of 40 year old buffoons out here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would worry if they text you every other day after the event, and start questioning you about your other conquests and getting possessive. But I don't think you should deduce that a bit of personal chat particularly means anything. And people talk a hell of a lot of crap when caught in a moment of passion. Then it's out of sight out mind until next time. Just enjoy the experience for what it's worth, and don't worry about these things. As you said nobody has actually done anything specific to suggest they want a relationship. I actually think the opposite. The bedroom is where honesty truly resides. Hence how alot of the race related expectations or desire mentioned here...would NEVER be mentioned by the same people in public. Besides, when someone is telling me they love meeting multiple different guys ever week and then also tell me that they're on anti-depresssants and suffering distinct bouts of loneliness...I often ask whether their lifestyle may really be whats best for them. Of course, I wont judge...but I have had it alot. Keep in mind, these women never told me that they actually wanted relationships. Never. But it was clear they were not happy with their love lives, any remotely clairvoyant individual could deduce it. That's true. That is a bit too personal, and reasonable to deduce they might have issues that need resolving. I don't think that's reflective of the swing scene though, or reason to believe that women on Fab are looking for relationships. " Maybe I am wrong then. But I like engaging with the people I meet. On a personal level, I've always had a rule that I never fuck people that I cant have a good conversation with. Thing is, you tend to learn a interesting amount about people from a good conversation. Its not about them wanting relationships with me, but as I said in the very first post about this topic, I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There is "sex talk" and lying, you're doing the latter. Even from your posts here, you genuinely seem kinda all over the place." Where you there? Did you hear it? How do you know they are lying? Did you deduce it? It'll be an unpleasant lesson to learn but you don't know everything. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would worry if they text you every other day after the event, and start questioning you about your other conquests and getting possessive. But I don't think you should deduce that a bit of personal chat particularly means anything. And people talk a hell of a lot of crap when caught in a moment of passion. Then it's out of sight out mind until next time. Just enjoy the experience for what it's worth, and don't worry about these things. As you said nobody has actually done anything specific to suggest they want a relationship. I actually think the opposite. The bedroom is where honesty truly resides. Hence how alot of the race related expectations or desire mentioned here...would NEVER be mentioned by the same people in public. Besides, when someone is telling me they love meeting multiple different guys ever week and then also tell me that they're on anti-depresssants and suffering distinct bouts of loneliness...I often ask whether their lifestyle may really be whats best for them. Of course, I wont judge...but I have had it alot. Keep in mind, these women never told me that they actually wanted relationships. Never. But it was clear they were not happy with their love lives, any remotely clairvoyant individual could deduce it. That's true. That is a bit too personal, and reasonable to deduce they might have issues that need resolving. I don't think that's reflective of the swing scene though, or reason to believe that women on Fab are looking for relationships. Maybe I am wrong then. But I like engaging with the people I meet. On a personal level, I've always had a rule that I never fuck people that I cant have a good conversation with. Thing is, you tend to learn a interesting amount about people from a good conversation. Its not about them wanting relationships with me, but as I said in the very first post about this topic, I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. " I have never cancelled a meet nor had one cancelled on me. Maybe they are reading your posts on the forum and changing their minds .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would worry if they text you every other day after the event, and start questioning you about your other conquests and getting possessive. But I don't think you should deduce that a bit of personal chat particularly means anything. And people talk a hell of a lot of crap when caught in a moment of passion. Then it's out of sight out mind until next time. Just enjoy the experience for what it's worth, and don't worry about these things. As you said nobody has actually done anything specific to suggest they want a relationship. I actually think the opposite. The bedroom is where honesty truly resides. Hence how alot of the race related expectations or desire mentioned here...would NEVER be mentioned by the same people in public. Besides, when someone is telling me they love meeting multiple different guys ever week and then also tell me that they're on anti-depresssants and suffering distinct bouts of loneliness...I often ask whether their lifestyle may really be whats best for them. Of course, I wont judge...but I have had it alot. Keep in mind, these women never told me that they actually wanted relationships. Never. But it was clear they were not happy with their love lives, any remotely clairvoyant individual could deduce it. That's true. That is a bit too personal, and reasonable to deduce they might have issues that need resolving. I don't think that's reflective of the swing scene though, or reason to believe that women on Fab are looking for relationships. Maybe I am wrong then. But I like engaging with the people I meet. On a personal level, I've always had a rule that I never fuck people that I cant have a good conversation with. Thing is, you tend to learn a interesting amount about people from a good conversation. Its not about them wanting relationships with me, but as I said in the very first post about this topic, I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. I have never cancelled a meet nor had one cancelled on me. Maybe they are reading your posts on the forum and changing their minds .... " They are probably thankful of a lucky escape | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There is "sex talk" and lying, you're doing the latter. Even from your posts here, you genuinely seem kinda all over the place. Where you there? Did you hear it? How do you know they are lying? Did you deduce it? It'll be an unpleasant lesson to learn but you don't know everything." I was just wondering the same myself ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"but I wont pretend for a second that seeking multiple different partners ad nauseum has an affect on ones mind, especially in women." Did I read that right? Women can't handle having lots of sexual partners? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would worry if they text you every other day after the event, and start questioning you about your other conquests and getting possessive. But I don't think you should deduce that a bit of personal chat particularly means anything. And people talk a hell of a lot of crap when caught in a moment of passion. Then it's out of sight out mind until next time. Just enjoy the experience for what it's worth, and don't worry about these things. As you said nobody has actually done anything specific to suggest they want a relationship. I actually think the opposite. The bedroom is where honesty truly resides. Hence how alot of the race related expectations or desire mentioned here...would NEVER be mentioned by the same people in public. Besides, when someone is telling me they love meeting multiple different guys ever week and then also tell me that they're on anti-depresssants and suffering distinct bouts of loneliness...I often ask whether their lifestyle may really be whats best for them. Of course, I wont judge...but I have had it alot. Keep in mind, these women never told me that they actually wanted relationships. Never. But it was clear they were not happy with their love lives, any remotely clairvoyant individual could deduce it. That's true. That is a bit too personal, and reasonable to deduce they might have issues that need resolving. I don't think that's reflective of the swing scene though, or reason to believe that women on Fab are looking for relationships. Maybe I am wrong then. But I like engaging with the people I meet. On a personal level, I've always had a rule that I never fuck people that I cant have a good conversation with. Thing is, you tend to learn a interesting amount about people from a good conversation. Its not about them wanting relationships with me, but as I said in the very first post about this topic, I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. I have never cancelled a meet nor had one cancelled on me. Maybe they are reading your posts on the forum and changing their minds .... " No they're not. I have not been posting on the forum, and even if they had if one thinks that cancelling on the day/an hour before a meet is justifiable because of disagreeable forum posts then... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"but I wont pretend for a second that seeking multiple different partners ad nauseum has an affect on ones mind, especially in women. Did I read that right? Women can't handle having lots of sexual partners?" That's right, whilst they are waiting and striving for the right man to come along .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"but I wont pretend for a second that seeking multiple different partners ad nauseum has an affect on ones mind, especially in women. Did I read that right? Women can't handle having lots of sexual partners?" N.O.P.E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Have we worked out if women are kinky yet?" Don't know 'about that but it seems that we are non-entities | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Have we worked out if women are kinky yet? Don't know 'about that but it seems that we are non-entities" That's dissapointing . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. " Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"but I wont pretend for a second that seeking multiple different partners ad nauseum has an affect on ones mind, especially in women. Did I read that right? Women can't handle having lots of sexual partners? Oh my god. Oh so this backs up the theory that we are all here to find a man, but so tucked up by the time we find a good one, that we are no use to anyone N.O.P.E" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce " Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce " I will take looks over personality if I want a dial a cock quick shag,.... not for a relationship though. Hey wait a minute, I am sounding like a man now .... I wouldn't date any man I met on here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. " She didn't say good looking; you 'deduced' that too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. " It depends on your definition of 'good looking/fit' though doesn't it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. It depends on your definition of 'good looking/fit' though doesn't it" yeah lets pretend as if "gym body" and "gym fit" is not a thing. Lets also pretend that a guy who is in shape is not about 20 times more likely to be in better shape than someone who doesnt. This is what I mean, you're so desperate to feel better about your decision and get pats on the back from the rest of your clique friends that you'll compromise your own stance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. " As you like to say. read what I said, I did not say "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" What I'm politely trying to say is that loads of women will not find you attractive. Personally I can't stand the 'meathead' look and mentality. So you will know nothing about how loads of women think, feel and operate. Because you're not our type. Anyone's sample of the opposite sex is limited to those they can interact with. You do NOT know everything about women and to suggest you do is arrogant nonsense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. It depends on your definition of 'good looking/fit' though doesn't it yeah lets pretend as if "gym body" and "gym fit" is not a thing. Lets also pretend that a guy who is in shape is not about 20 times more likely to be in better shape than someone who doesnt. This is what I mean, you're so desperate to feel better about your decision and get pats on the back from the rest of your clique friends that you'll compromise your own stance. " eugh, that was meant to "more fit than someone who doesnt". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. It depends on your definition of 'good looking/fit' though doesn't it yeah lets pretend as if "gym body" and "gym fit" is not a thing. Lets also pretend that a guy who is in shape is not about 20 times more likely to be in better shape than someone who doesnt. This is what I mean, you're so desperate to feel better about your decision and get pats on the back from the rest of your clique friends that you'll compromise your own stance. " P, you joined THE clique? Put in a good word for me too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. It depends on your definition of 'good looking/fit' though doesn't it yeah lets pretend as if "gym body" and "gym fit" is not a thing. Lets also pretend that a guy who is in shape is not about 20 times more likely to be in better shape than someone who doesnt. This is what I mean, you're so desperate to feel better about your decision and get pats on the back from the rest of your clique friends that you'll compromise your own stance. " Once again, I am not in the clique and I am also not attracted to that look either .... doesn't do it for me, sorry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. It depends on your definition of 'good looking/fit' though doesn't it yeah lets pretend as if "gym body" and "gym fit" is not a thing. Lets also pretend that a guy who is in shape is not about 20 times more likely to be in better shape than someone who doesnt. This is what I mean, you're so desperate to feel better about your decision and get pats on the back from the rest of your clique friends that you'll compromise your own stance. P, you joined THE clique? Put in a good word for me too " Bloody hell, first I have heard of it. Normally I am pizzing them off and dealing with the consequences | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. As you like to say. read what I said, I did not say "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" What I'm politely trying to say is that loads of women will not find you attractive. Personally I can't stand the 'meathead' look and mentality. So you will know nothing about how loads of women think, feel and operate. Because you're not our type. Anyone's sample of the opposite sex is limited to those they can interact with. You do NOT know everything about women and to suggest you do is arrogant nonsense " This has nothing to do with looks. You attribute looks to ones personality where they really dont have a ton of correlation. I have feeling you just wanted to comment on my body...but once again, I dont see how it pertains to the conversation. And I definitely dont like the idea that there is a "type" of woman who goes for "meatheads". Its an incredibly misogynistic way to think. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. It depends on your definition of 'good looking/fit' though doesn't it yeah lets pretend as if "gym body" and "gym fit" is not a thing. Lets also pretend that a guy who is in shape is not about 20 times more likely to be in better shape than someone who doesnt. This is what I mean, you're so desperate to feel better about your decision and get pats on the back from the rest of your clique friends that you'll compromise your own stance. Once again, I am not in the clique and I am also not attracted to that look either .... doesn't do it for me, sorry " Who cares about the look that you're attracted to? What does it have to do with this conversation? I cant tell whether you're trying to imply that men who go to the gym all think the same way or that you're actually trying to imply that I value your input about your sexual desires. I don't. At all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What I'm politely trying to say is that loads of women will not find you attractive. Personally I can't stand the 'meathead' look and mentality. So you will know nothing about how loads of women think, feel and operate. Because you're not our type. Anyone's sample of the opposite sex is limited to those they can interact with. You do NOT know everything about women and to suggest you do is arrogant nonsense This has nothing to do with looks. You attribute looks to ones personality where they really dont have a ton of correlation. I have feeling you just wanted to comment on my body...but once again, I dont see how it pertains to the conversation. And I definitely dont like the idea that there is a "type" of woman who goes for "meatheads". Its an incredibly misogynistic way to think." No I don't. I'm saying there will be some women who find you attractive and a lot who won't. So your basis for knowing about women is based solely on the women who will interact with you. Not all women. Nothing was said about looks and personality having a correlation. Please stop deducing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What I'm politely trying to say is that loads of women will not find you attractive. Personally I can't stand the 'meathead' look and mentality. So you will know nothing about how loads of women think, feel and operate. Because you're not our type. Anyone's sample of the opposite sex is limited to those they can interact with. You do NOT know everything about women and to suggest you do is arrogant nonsense This has nothing to do with looks. You attribute looks to ones personality where they really dont have a ton of correlation. I have feeling you just wanted to comment on my body...but once again, I dont see how it pertains to the conversation. And I definitely dont like the idea that there is a "type" of woman who goes for "meatheads". Its an incredibly misogynistic way to think. No I don't. I'm saying there will be some women who find you attractive and a lot who won't. So your basis for knowing about women is based solely on the women who will interact with you. Not all women. Nothing was said about looks and personality having a correlation. Please stop deducing" Please don't ask him to stop deducing. This thread won't be half as much fun then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think single women are cut out for swinging and most of my disappointments (in terms of canceled meets/lack of clarity about the situation) have come from the demographic. Maybe it's the type of women you attract? Those that are attracted to the gym body men would tend to be those who seek looks over personality, I would deduce Dont lower the conversation to that shallow rubbish in attempt to feign moral superiority. "Anyone who dates good looking/fit people is just shallow!!" Oh please. It depends on your definition of 'good looking/fit' though doesn't it yeah lets pretend as if "gym body" and "gym fit" is not a thing. Lets also pretend that a guy who is in shape is not about 20 times more likely to be in better shape than someone who doesnt. This is what I mean, you're so desperate to feel better about your decision and get pats on the back from the rest of your clique friends that you'll compromise your own stance. Once again, I am not in the clique and I am also not attracted to that look either .... doesn't do it for me, sorry Who cares about the look that you're attracted to? What does it have to do with this conversation? I cant tell whether you're trying to imply that men who go to the gym all think the same way or that you're actually trying to imply that I value your input about your sexual desires. I don't. At all." I can voice my opinion, its not just to you, so don't try to bully me into being quiet as it wont work. I dont care if you think I am in some clique because that really isn't relevant now is it, talking or relevance here. This thread is about men's outdated views on women and now the stereotypes each adheres to or falls into. You are talking your self frantically into a corner there you know | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I cant tell whether you're trying to imply that men who go to the gym all think the same way or that you're actually trying to imply that I value your input about your sexual desires. I don't. At all." I'm not trying to imply anything. I'm being as clear as I can. Not all women will fancy you and the look you work to achieve. Therefore you will not know what all women are like and cannot keep deducing you know everything about women. If you could see that you don't know all women because you've never interacted with a whole bunch of us then this would be a lot easier. And I'm really not interested in you, as I'm sure you're not in me. But I'm cool with it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, inspired by another thread that has got me thinking ... are so called 'kinky' single women only being kinky to get a man? If so, what does this mean about women in couples, are they staying kinky to keep their man? How many women will admit to their whole sexuality revolving around a man? Is that even possible? Could anyone sustain a lifetime or however long of a sexuality that wasn't their own to keep a partner? It seems some men think it is .... women revolve around men, apparently their life has no meaning without men?!" Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Please don't ask him to stop deducing. This thread won't be half as much fun then" Oooops, sorry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I cant tell whether you're trying to imply that men who go to the gym all think the same way or that you're actually trying to imply that I value your input about your sexual desires. I don't. At all. I'm not trying to imply anything. I'm being as clear as I can. Not all women will fancy you and the look you work to achieve. Therefore you will not know what all women are like and cannot keep deducing you know everything about women. If you could see that you don't know all women because you've never interacted with a whole bunch of us then this would be a lot easier. And I'm really not interested in you, as I'm sure you're not in me. But I'm cool with it " Sorry kink, thought he was having a go at me, but maybe he can't tell us apart either .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Its an unrealistic expectation...precisely because possession and sexual exclusivity tend to define the early stages of a relationship. ESPECIALLY for men. Really? Really ? You sound like a sycophant. I dont value your opinion. So who's opinion do you value? " Guess that's a no then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry kink, thought he was having a go at me, but maybe he can't tell us apart either ...." Yes, I could be the top and you could be the bottom | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Its an unrealistic expectation...precisely because possession and sexual exclusivity tend to define the early stages of a relationship. ESPECIALLY for men. Really? Really ? You sound like a sycophant. I dont value your opinion." And nobody values the opinion of a psychopath | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |