FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Circumsized or not
Circumsized or not
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Yes, its not all about the cock the guy has to meet your other preferences inc size, stiffness, etc, etc.
My wifes only had a few circumsized cocks all years ago she said ther was no difference when comparing to uncut on a similar man.
However, I had noted from the feedback from the men that fucked my wife she appeared to be more excited.
Do women note a difference with a cut cock? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" I had noted from the feedback from the men that fucked my wife she appeared to be more excited.
"
You could also deduce from this that circumcised men are more likely to exaggerate when describing your wife's excitement ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" I had noted from the feedback from the men that fucked my wife she appeared to be more excited.
You could also deduce from this that circumcised men are more likely to exaggerate when describing your wife's excitement ? "
Interesting suggestion. Why would circumcised men be more likely to exagerate? Is that due to the represseed effect of the violation all those years ago? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Interesting suggestion. Why would circumcised men be more likely to exagerate? Is that due to the represseed effect of the violation all those years ago?"
How does OP know his wife was more excited with the circumcised men other than what they told him ? How could the circumcised men compare his wife's level of excitement to previos times when they hadn't been there ? It all spunds unscientific evidence to me ! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Mine is a bit tight so it looks circumcised when pulled back behind the glans.  "
Ouch! Tight can be dangerous, especially if you get it caught in your coat zip!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Can’t lie some foreskin looks weird, and some can’t even pull it fully back which is kinda gross cos your defo building up knob cheese. "
Yep no one likes a cheesy smegma dip  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago
Maldon and Peterborough |
"Mine is a bit tight so it looks circumcised when pulled back behind the glans.
Ouch! Tight can be dangerous, especially if you get it caught in your coat zip!! "
Then can you please be careful when zipping me up.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Mine was very tight until a few months ago I had a partial circumcision, fantastic 100% easier to keep it spotless clean , not much heard about partial but it worked a treat for me , happy to talk to anyone about it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I got cut for medical reasons about 11 years ago (commando related zipper accident...don't ask).
Absoutely do not recommend it to anyone unless medically required as it desensitised you. I'd say I lost at least 30% sensation.
I don't belive it's anymore or less more hygienic if you shower daily anyway so that's just a myth.
However it certainly does make you last longer. I was a long laster and repeater anyway but I suspect I can last too long sometimes.
As for reception from women...wife loved it and I've never had any complaints from anyone else bar one lady who refused a meet as she didn't like cut dicks. Sorry luv but I couldn't exactly grow it out for you. Met a couple of ladies who really really loved it
It though....they'd never had a cut dick before and they seemed quite interested in checking it out.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Mine is a bit tight so it looks circumcised when pulled back behind the glans.
Ouch! Tight can be dangerous, especially if you get it caught in your coat zip!!
Then can you please be careful when zipping me up. "
Sorry hun, just had my nails done  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *hunky GentMan
over a year ago
Maldon and Peterborough |
"Mine is a bit tight so it looks circumcised when pulled back behind the glans.
Ouch! Tight can be dangerous, especially if you get it caught in your coat zip!!
Then can you please be careful when zipping me up.
Sorry hun, just had my nails done "
Best leave it hanging out then. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Interesting suggestion. Why would circumcised men be more likely to exagerate? Is that due to the represseed effect of the violation all those years ago?
How does OP know his wife was more excited with the circumcised men other than what they told him ? How could the circumcised men compare his wife's level of excitement to previos times when they hadn't been there ? It all spunds unscientific evidence to me ! "
Well indeed. This had occured to me too. I'd expected him to describe observed levels of excitement with objective tests as far as possible - e.g. volume of screams; time until orgasm; whether she wants to see the guy again. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" I had noted from the feedback from the men that fucked my wife she appeared to be more excited.
You could also deduce from this that circumcised men are more likely to exaggerate when describing your wife's excitement ? "
All of them? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andb69Couple
over a year ago
leeds |
Cut or uncut doesn't make much difference to me while fucking (with a condom!) but for wanking and playing an uncut cock is much better, providing the foreskin is fully retractable - I love the feel of sliding back and forth over the helmet. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Cut or uncut doesn't make much difference to me while fucking (with a condom!) but for wanking and playing an uncut cock is much better, providing the foreskin is fully retractable - I love the feel of sliding back and forth over the helmet. "
This  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Uncircumcised =dirty
White stuff comes out when pulling it back "
No it doesn’t.
Not washing = dirty
Happily uncircumcised, although it only goes about 1/3 down my helmet even fully soft
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Uncircumcised =dirty
White stuff comes out when pulling it back "
With respect that is load of old bow locks I can assure you and anyone else Zeus's cock is absolutly clean.
Whilst iv nothing at all against circumsion, Forskin is natural and if anyones stinks it is because they do not wash it.
Just saying  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Flynns uncircumcised, i honestly can't tell the difference between him and a friend who's cut and very similarly sized when they're both hard. They look and feel identical and last similar times
I genuinely couldnt careless either way, a nice dick is a nice dick whether it's cut or not xx
Elle xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
a few here have mentined 'hygien' - nothing to do with that re cut cock ie if you bath/shower daily and wash properly you are clean cut or no cut and that is a fact
a lame bastard that worked at my place cited his cock was cut becuse its more "hygenic" BS i told him complete BS |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eyupMan
over a year ago
Bridlington |
I’m cut and was cut when I was 19 and yes it hurt lol. Ripped it while having sex before anyone ask, I love the look of it cut but have to admit you do lose the feelings round the tip of your cock but hey ho can’t change it back |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Uncircumcised =dirty
White stuff comes out when pulling it back "
Hmm good observation, so booger comes out from eye, would help after removing eyelid? Genuinely curious to know |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Uncircumcised =dirty
White stuff comes out when pulling it back
With respect that is load of old bow locks I can assure you and anyone else Zeus's cock is absolutly clean.
Whilst iv nothing at all against circumsion, Forskin is natural and if anyones stinks it is because they do not wash it.
Just saying "
Thank you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.
To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis
It should be illegal unless necessary. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Mine was done at birth due to being born in a country where it's done to everyone and not even considered an option. I'd prefer to have been left intact but not much I can do about it after the fact. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Have no preference either way. Its not something ive ever asked. I couldnt even tell you, from who ive met who had and hadnt. I must notice but i can honestly say i cant think of one time ive thought consciously when looking at a cock, oh its cut or oh its un cut. I just see cock. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Back in the 1970s-1980s all boys were circumcised automatically.
"
Not in the U.K. they weren’t.
In all the schools I went to, there were very few circumcised lads. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.
To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis
It should be illegal unless necessary. "
Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....
While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...
And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.
To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis
It should be illegal unless necessary.
Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....
While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...
And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well..."
What absolute nonsense. So is female genital mutilation fine in the cultures that allow it just because it’s a tradition or ritual?
This is basically male genital mutilation if it is performed of an infant for any reason other than health grounds. If they can’t consent, it should not be done. End of |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Mr is circumised and having been together for 14 years, I'm very used to it.
In my experience, penetration doesn't feel much different, with or without a foreskin. I think that's more to do with girth, length and (most especially) technique.
It absolutely makes a difference to hand jobs and blow jobs because the difference in anatomy means a very slightly different technique is needed.
I prefer cut but I guess that could be 14 years of being intimate with Mr.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.
To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis
It should be illegal unless necessary.
Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....
While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...
And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well...
What absolute nonsense. So is female genital mutilation fine in the cultures that allow it just because it’s a tradition or ritual?
This is basically male genital mutilation if it is performed of an infant for any reason other than health grounds. If they can’t consent, it should not be done. End of "
They’re not comparable at all, female genital mutilation is a very dangerous procedure that leaves women with long term discomfort, infection, problems with giving birth amongst other things. Circumcision is a simple operation with no health risks at all. I’d never advocate female genital mutilation, even if it is considered a religious tradition, but you really can’t compare the two. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.
To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis
It should be illegal unless necessary.
Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....
While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...
And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well...
What absolute nonsense. So is female genital mutilation fine in the cultures that allow it just because it’s a tradition or ritual?
This is basically male genital mutilation if it is performed of an infant for any reason other than health grounds. If they can’t consent, it should not be done. End of
They’re not comparable at all, female genital mutilation is a very dangerous procedure that leaves women with long term discomfort, infection, problems with giving birth amongst other things. Circumcision is a simple operation with no health risks at all. I’d never advocate female genital mutilation, even if it is considered a religious tradition, but you really can’t compare the two. "
Yet you can compare circumcision to all the nonsense you compared it to? Doing anything surgical that is physically uneccesary to an infant is abuse. Simple as. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I like my partners clean, other than that uncut is better for a hand job.
To be honest the whole concept of circumcision makes me uncomfortable. I cannot fathom why any loving parent would agree to an unnecessary operation on their child's penis
It should be illegal unless necessary.
Are you going to tell the Jews to put an end to thousands of years of tradition then or shall I? I’m sure they’ll stop doing it though as it makes you uncomfortable....
While we’re at it can we tell Christians to lift their ban on sex before marriage as well because I think that’s a weird concept...
And Muslims not being allowed to eat pork is cruel because pork’s so delicious and they’re missing out so that should be scrapped as well...
What absolute nonsense. So is female genital mutilation fine in the cultures that allow it just because it’s a tradition or ritual?
This is basically male genital mutilation if it is performed of an infant for any reason other than health grounds. If they can’t consent, it should not be done. End of
They’re not comparable at all, female genital mutilation is a very dangerous procedure that leaves women with long term discomfort, infection, problems with giving birth amongst other things. Circumcision is a simple operation with no health risks at all. I’d never advocate female genital mutilation, even if it is considered a religious tradition, but you really can’t compare the two.
Yet you can compare circumcision to all the nonsense you compared it to? Doing anything surgical that is physically uneccesary to an infant is abuse. Simple as. "
I compared them because they’re also religious traditions that I don’t necessarily agree with so if circumcisions should be banned because people outside the religion don’t agree with it then why shouldn’t the other things that I don’t agree with. Surely making young adults feel like sinners for having sex before marriage is a form of abuse too? Telling people what they are and aren’t allowed to eat is a way of controlling them and not allowing them the freedom to make their own choices which is also a form of abuse.
I’m not actually saying that I think circumcising infants is right and I believe it’s as much a form of abuse as the other ways religion controls and manipulates people of faith but what I am saying is that it’s not our place to tell an entire religion that they should stop doing something that’s quite an integral part of their beliefs just because we don’t like it.
I don’t actually believe it is a form of abuse, I was circumcised for medical reasons when I was a young child and it was unpleasant but it hasn’t had any lasting, long term negative affects on me like real abuse would have. To class it as abuse is actually doing an injustice to people who do suffer real abuse that will haunt them for the rest of their lives. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Religion is basically sanctioned delusion and in a secular society there should be absolutely no tolerance of cutting bits off children of any gender because of unproven 'beliefs' or 'faith' that it will somehow improve the life of said child. We have an age of majority for a reason. If an adult wants to alter their genitals or other body parts for reasons of faith then of course it should be allowed, but I would postulate the main reason that these 'traditions' are done to children is of course that by the time they reach adulthood, common sense has kicked in so of course they will die out. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Religion is basically sanctioned delusion and in a secular society there should be absolutely no tolerance of cutting bits off children of any gender because of unproven 'beliefs' or 'faith' that it will somehow improve the life of said child. We have an age of majority for a reason. If an adult wants to alter their genitals or other body parts for reasons of faith then of course it should be allowed, but I would postulate the main reason that these 'traditions' are done to children is of course that by the time they reach adulthood, common sense has kicked in so of course they will die out. "
I’ve just done some quick research into why Jews circumcise infant boys and it seems that the reason is actually unknown, there is a story about God telling someone to circumcise all his children but the tradition pre dates this (on a side note...isn’t it weird how God used to talk to people a lot in biblical times but doesn’t do it so much in modern times....). I totally agree with your description of religions but the point still stands that it’s an ancient tradition that, although unpleasant, doesn’t cause any long term pain or suffering. When a priest pours water over a baby’s head during a christening the baby pretty much always cries and it’s obviously not a pleasant experience for them so should this be banned too? I appreciate it’s not the same level of discomfort for the baby but it’s still discomfort.
How do you feel about children having to take part in Ramadan? It’s obviously incredibly difficult for them to fast for so long so should this be banned too?
By the way, please don’t think I’m being argumentative and I hope I don’t sound aggressive at all, it’s hard not to sound aggressive when debating an opposing opinion with texts but I am genuinely just looking for a discussion and not an argument and do listen to other people’s opinions. I can see why people think it’s wrong and I don’t necessarily agree with the tradition but I also respect traditions and am trying to see it from the view of people that follow the tradition. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I still think performing surgery on an infant for no good reason is abuse and isn’t comparable in any way or for to putting water on a child’s head. Personally, I think religion has no place in the modern world, but fat chance of any of it disappearing.
You say it doesn’t cause any long term pain or suffering. What if it does? I’m sure there’s plenty out there with botched circumcisions. Even some of the guys commenting on here look pretty scarred to me, even if they’re not in any discomfort. I’ve seen on TV guys who’ve actually weighted what skin they had to, in effect, grow another foreskin as they felt they should have had the choice.
The whole thing is just weird, outdated and basically child abuse. Just because it’s been done for centuries doesn’t make it right and it should be against the law. You’ll never convince me otherwise no matter what reasoning you bring up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *1bttmMan
over a year ago
Shoreditch east London |
"Back in the 1970s-1980s all boys were circumcised automatically.
"
Maybe the case in Canada as I notice that's where u are. But quite opp in UK. The majority where uncut with just a handful of guys I remember being cut. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *1bttmMan
over a year ago
Shoreditch east London |
"Uncircumcised =dirty
White stuff comes out when pulling it back "
There's some people that consider having a hairy cock = dirty. The hair traps all the sweat and is unhygienic. Both very naive tbh. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I still think performing surgery on an infant for no good reason is abuse and isn’t comparable in any way or for to putting water on a child’s head. Personally, I think religion has no place in the modern world, but fat chance of any of it disappearing.
You say it doesn’t cause any long term pain or suffering. What if it does? I’m sure there’s plenty out there with botched circumcisions. Even some of the guys commenting on here look pretty scarred to me, even if they’re not in any discomfort. I’ve seen on TV guys who’ve actually weighted what skin they had to, in effect, grow another foreskin as they felt they should have had the choice.
The whole thing is just weird, outdated and basically child abuse. Just because it’s been done for centuries doesn’t make it right and it should be against the law. You’ll never convince me otherwise no matter what reasoning you bring up. "
I did say pouring water on a baby’s head was a much lesser discomfort for baby’s but it’s still a discomfort, where do you draw the line at what discomfort is ok to put a baby through in the name of religion and what isn’t? I do totally agree with you that there’s no good reason for doing it and it’s out dated but I still can’t accept that it’s child abuse, there’s no anger or hatred involved and the child is safe, it seems like an exaggeration to call it that. The fact that Jewish fathers allow their son’s to be circumcised shows that it’s not something they begrudge being done to them.
You’re obviously not a religious person but I bet you celebrate Christmas don’t you? It seems weird and outdated that we celebrate the birth of someone we don’t believe existed but we do it because it’s traditional. A bride wearing a white dress to her wedding to symbolise her virginity is weird and outdated but we still do it because it’s traditional. Having to go to work to provide a service to earn money to pay someone else who’s providing a service is weird and outdated but we still do it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Religion is basically sanctioned delusion and in a secular society there should be absolutely no tolerance of cutting bits off children of any gender because of unproven 'beliefs' or 'faith' that it will somehow improve the life of said child. We have an age of majority for a reason. If an adult wants to alter their genitals or other body parts for reasons of faith then of course it should be allowed, but I would postulate the main reason that these 'traditions' are done to children is of course that by the time they reach adulthood, common sense has kicked in so of course they will die out.
I’ve just done some quick research into why Jews circumcise infant boys and it seems that the reason is actually unknown, there is a story about God telling someone to circumcise all his children but the tradition pre dates this (on a side note...isn’t it weird how God used to talk to people a lot in biblical times but doesn’t do it so much in modern times....). I totally agree with your description of religions but the point still stands that it’s an ancient tradition that, although unpleasant, doesn’t cause any long term pain or suffering. When a priest pours water over a baby’s head during a christening the baby pretty much always cries and it’s obviously not a pleasant experience for them so should this be banned too? I appreciate it’s not the same level of discomfort for the baby but it’s still discomfort.
How do you feel about children having to take part in Ramadan? It’s obviously incredibly difficult for them to fast for so long so should this be banned too?
By the way, please don’t think I’m being argumentative and I hope I don’t sound aggressive at all, it’s hard not to sound aggressive when debating an opposing opinion with texts but I am genuinely just looking for a discussion and not an argument and do listen to other people’s opinions. I can see why people think it’s wrong and I don’t necessarily agree with the tradition but I also respect traditions and am trying to see it from the view of people that follow the tradition. "
If developing a leathery glans due to the lack of the skin specifically designed to stop that from happening isn't a negative long-term effect, then what is?
I speak from the experience of having had my own removed as a baby. Honestly, I wish that that had not been done to me. The fact I have no experience of life as an 'intact' male shouldn't prevent me from holding a viewpoint that what was done to me would not have happened if I was able to exercise my own power of consent. If there are real, tangible benefits to having said procedure, it should be up to the adult to make that decision about their own body. Comparing pouring a bit of water over a baby's head to cutting functional parts of the anatomy with thousands of nerve endings and a direct result on sexual function as an adult is beyond asinine, sorry. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Religious tolerance is not tolerating adults abusing children and claiming a sky fairy said it's OK. It's allowing individuals to practise their own beliefs and rituals without being persecuted. As soon as it involves cruelty to children then it becomes a hard 'no'. If it were to be proven that total immersion baptism or even just a splash of water on the forehead of a baby could cause long term trauma and associated effects then absolutely it should be banned also. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I did say pouring water on a baby’s head was a much lesser discomfort for baby’s but it’s still a discomfort, where do you draw the line at what discomfort is ok to put a baby through in the name of religion and what isn’t? I do totally agree with you that there’s no good reason for doing it and it’s out dated but I still can’t accept that it’s child abuse, there’s no anger or hatred involved and the child is safe, it seems like an exaggeration to call it that. The fact that Jewish fathers allow their son’s to be circumcised shows that it’s not something they begrudge being done to them.
You’re obviously not a religious person but I bet you celebrate Christmas don’t you? It seems weird and outdated that we celebrate the birth of someone we don’t believe existed but we do it because it’s traditional. A bride wearing a white dress to her wedding to symbolise her virginity is weird and outdated but we still do it because it’s traditional. Having to go to work to provide a service to earn money to pay someone else who’s providing a service is weird and outdated but we still do it. "
Your logic and reasoning is getting even more bizarre. How can you not think cutting the flesh of a child with no good reason isn’t child abuse? I’m sure many child abusers have no hatred or anger when abusing a child, but it’s still abuse.
I’m done with arguing before you bring the Easter bunny into it. Almost all your arguments for tradition are things adults choose. Circumcision isn’t one |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I did say pouring water on a baby’s head was a much lesser discomfort for baby’s but it’s still a discomfort, where do you draw the line at what discomfort is ok to put a baby through in the name of religion and what isn’t? I do totally agree with you that there’s no good reason for doing it and it’s out dated but I still can’t accept that it’s child abuse, there’s no anger or hatred involved and the child is safe, it seems like an exaggeration to call it that. The fact that Jewish fathers allow their son’s to be circumcised shows that it’s not something they begrudge being done to them.
You’re obviously not a religious person but I bet you celebrate Christmas don’t you? It seems weird and outdated that we celebrate the birth of someone we don’t believe existed but we do it because it’s traditional. A bride wearing a white dress to her wedding to symbolise her virginity is weird and outdated but we still do it because it’s traditional. Having to go to work to provide a service to earn money to pay someone else who’s providing a service is weird and outdated but we still do it.
Your logic and reasoning is getting even more bizarre. How can you not think cutting the flesh of a child with no good reason isn’t child abuse? I’m sure many child abusers have no hatred or anger when abusing a child, but it’s still abuse.
I’m done with arguing before you bring the Easter bunny into it. Almost all your arguments for tradition are things adults choose. Circumcision isn’t one"
I did consider bringing Easter into it actually haha. I’m sorry you thought it was an argument, I wasn’t trying to be argumentative, I just wanted to discuss it. I can completely see where your coming from and I knew as I was typing the stuff about Christmas and wedding dresses it was a bit bizarre and I probably should have deleted but I was just trying to show that there are lots of things we do because of tradition that are pointless and outdated, I know we choose to do them but they’re still pointless.
I’ve never actually said that I think it’s ok to circumcise infants unnecessarily, I don’t think it’s on the level of child abuse but I certainly don’t think it’s right, I’ve just been trying to highlight that it’s a tradition that is sacramental to Jews and that shouldn’t be ignored and scoffed at.
I’m not religious at all but I respect people who are and I respect their beliefs and traditions, non of us actually know who’s right, maybe there is a God and I’m wrong for not believing in him/her/it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
these threads are getting pretty boring now almost weekly people saying guys with forskins are dirty and guys who are cut are too dry ...mines better than your puff chest out the fact is most of us women do give a shit as long as clean and working ... a cut cock can be dirty too those of you where the forskin dont pull back / painful need to see your drs ... a dirty cock is a dirty cock cut or not ... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"these threads are getting pretty boring now almost weekly people saying guys with forskins are dirty and guys who are cut are too dry ...mines better than your puff chest out the fact is most of us women do give a shit as long as clean and working ... a cut cock can be dirty too those of you where the forskin dont pull back / painful need to see your drs ... a dirty cock is a dirty cock cut or not ... "
100%%% |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just like ASDAs prices my foreskin rolls back during sex with my partner so it gives the feel of cut anyway. With a condom it doesn't roll back. "
Don’t you pull your foreskin back when you put a condom on ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Still got mine and I'm happy with it.
It must help a lot with sensation because when it's pulled back fully it covers about a quarter of the length of my cock and it's by far the most sensitive part (sorry cut guys).
Helps with penetration too. If it's not pulled back it rolls back as it goes in so it makes a tight spot less of a tight spot. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *onB373Man
over a year ago
Berkshire |
I am not circumcised. The bell end is very sensitive and sometime you cum quicker than you would like.
I have been pulling the forskin back and slow making it less sensitive. I am at the stage where I can sleep some nights with the forskin back.
I am also able to push it back during the day... so getting there it has taken months to do this..... Do you have any tips to speed thing up |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I personally have no preference as I always ask the guys to wash their bits on arrival
If pushed I would say it’s slightly more enjoyable sucking a guy who’s circumcised esp when they cum
But for penetration and sex itself I can’t say I have noticed a difference. As another woman said earlier - I’m concentrating more at that point on how long and thick he is and how deep he is inside me tbh |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
…for those who don’t know what it is, it’s where your foreskin rolls into itself 
,
Xx