FabSwingers.com > Forums > Scotland > Use of Cis terminology
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread smells of Tory" That's sweeping generalisation. I've never voted Tory in my life. Labour, then SNP...though that may change as NS is buying into this pish too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread smells of Tory That's sweeping generalisation. I've never voted Tory in my life. Labour, then SNP...though that may change as NS is buying into this pish too." Buying into what pish? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread smells of Tory That's sweeping generalisation. I've never voted Tory in my life. Labour, then SNP...though that may change as NS is buying into this pish too. Buying into what pish? " Virtue signalling. I saw footage of her recently stating her pronouns. Fair enough, she can do that if she wants but call me cynical...it's not to be inclusive, or kind, it's an attempt to appeal to a younger demographic. There are far more people in the community with disabilities (visible or not) than there are trans people but I've yet to see or hear an MP stand up and refer to themselves as able bodied, or hearing, in recognition of their "privilege" and to demonstrate they know everyone isn't the same. It's completely disingenuous on the part of the politicians. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who cares? If you’re annoyed by a 3 letter prefix you need to get your priorities sorted. How often are you realistically going to be referred to as ‘cis’ in day to day life anyway? If it makes things easier for others then it’s all good in my eyes " I had to Google it Hey ho | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who cares? If you’re annoyed by a 3 letter prefix you need to get your priorities sorted. How often are you realistically going to be referred to as ‘cis’ in day to day life anyway? If it makes things easier for others then it’s all good in my eyes " So in some circumstances I'm being asked to use pronouns which don't obviously correlate with the person I see in front of me (I do just to avoid hassle btw) but I can't expect the same courtesy in return when I ask not to be referred to as Cis? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a friend of prison officers, the female guards are pissed at having to search males with erections, and that's not uncommon, or face losing their jobs. This happened multiple times and they are repremanded if they refuse. And contrary to belief, male guards really don't want to search females either." Rhona Hotchkiss (former prison governor at Cornton Vale) has spoke extensively about this. Have a look for her on YouTube. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a friend of prison officers, the female guards are pissed at having to search males with erections, and that's not uncommon, or face losing their jobs. This happened multiple times and they are repremanded if they refuse. And contrary to belief, male guards really don't want to search females either." my point is can't have it both ways..well there's a joke in there somewhere lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who cares? If you’re annoyed by a 3 letter prefix you need to get your priorities sorted. How often are you realistically going to be referred to as ‘cis’ in day to day life anyway? If it makes things easier for others then it’s all good in my eyes So in some circumstances I'm being asked to use pronouns which don't obviously correlate with the person I see in front of me (I do just to avoid hassle btw) but I can't expect the same courtesy in return when I ask not to be referred to as Cis? " You being referred to by someone as a cis-woman isn't someone using a pronoun. Granted, it may be somewhat irritating for you but, in essence, they are agreeing with your viewpoint in that they are addressing you as an individual who was assigned female gender at birth and lives as a woman. It's not a misgendering situation. If you use the person's prefered pronouns, that's amazing as you are recognising their identity in doing so. If you didn't use their preferred pronouns, not to say that you ever do or would, that would be like someone referring to you as he/him/man etc which, I assume, would be a bit irritating to you as well. At the end of the day, the use of pronouns and gender indicators is all about providing recognition to the way people identify and should be respected. Hell, if someone wanted to he referred to as a tattie, I would, because realistically it doesn't affect me in any manner but not referring to someone as they wish to be referred could be very impactful in their life. C x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Me personally feel uneasy calling someone them.its rude to me.if she or he looks like a female or male I'm saying him or her.Sorry if that offends you but its a fekn headfu*k to ask folk to know instinctively what you want to be known as." Okay, but what if they ASKED you to? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand how anyone can be against normalising the use of pronouns. Regardless of your “beliefs”, it’s such a simple and small thing for you to adjust which can make someone feel accepted, safe and respected. At the end of the day, nobody can force you to use specific language so you can do what you want. I just don’t get why you would actively go out of your way to be intolerant. The fact that there’s even a conversation or debate about this is so fucked. " I've said I would use their pronouns (he/she...no made up nonsense) when talking to them. That doesn't extend to what I'm thinking though. None of us has the right to expect to define how others see us. In that case I'd expect to be seen as an 18yr centrefold 365 days a year. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who cares? If you’re annoyed by a 3 letter prefix you need to get your priorities sorted. How often are you realistically going to be referred to as ‘cis’ in day to day life anyway? If it makes things easier for others then it’s all good in my eyes So in some circumstances I'm being asked to use pronouns which don't obviously correlate with the person I see in front of me (I do just to avoid hassle btw) but I can't expect the same courtesy in return when I ask not to be referred to as Cis? You being referred to by someone as a cis-woman isn't someone using a pronoun. Granted, it may be somewhat irritating for you but, in essence, they are agreeing with your viewpoint in that they are addressing you as an individual who was assigned female gender at birth and lives as a woman. It's not a misgendering situation. If you use the person's prefered pronouns, that's amazing as you are recognising their identity in doing so. If you didn't use their preferred pronouns, not to say that you ever do or would, that would be like someone referring to you as he/him/man etc which, I assume, would be a bit irritating to you as well. At the end of the day, the use of pronouns and gender indicators is all about providing recognition to the way people identify and should be respected. Hell, if someone wanted to he referred to as a tattie, I would, because realistically it doesn't affect me in any manner but not referring to someone as they wish to be referred could be very impactful in their life. C x " By referring to me as a "cis woman" the inference is that there are different kinds of women. And there aren't. Just the female kind. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand how anyone can be against normalising the use of pronouns. Regardless of your “beliefs”, it’s such a simple and small thing for you to adjust which can make someone feel accepted, safe and respected. At the end of the day, nobody can force you to use specific language so you can do what you want. I just don’t get why you would actively go out of your way to be intolerant. The fact that there’s even a conversation or debate about this is so fucked. " This whole thread sums up the hatred and othering that trans people face. It’s horrible. I suppose in a site where people are disinhibited about some aspects of their life, they’re more likely to use that anonymity to lower the mask and let the hate out. Its the sneering hateful way it’s delivered that really irks too. They say they “don’t have a problem with….” but then demand an end to or limitations on rights which people have held for years. The anonymity of a swingers site just makes it easier for the hateful speech in the thread above to flow freely. They hide their faces because they know society will judge theirs for their kinks, fetishes, or other sexual proclivities, but are quite happy to throw hate at anyone who doesn’t confirm to their own version of ‘normal’. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns." I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand how anyone can be against normalising the use of pronouns. Regardless of your “beliefs”, it’s such a simple and small thing for you to adjust which can make someone feel accepted, safe and respected. At the end of the day, nobody can force you to use specific language so you can do what you want. I just don’t get why you would actively go out of your way to be intolerant. The fact that there’s even a conversation or debate about this is so fucked. This whole thread sums up the hatred and othering that trans people face. It’s horrible. I suppose in a site where people are disinhibited about some aspects of their life, they’re more likely to use that anonymity to lower the mask and let the hate out. Its the sneering hateful way it’s delivered that really irks too. They say they “don’t have a problem with….” but then demand an end to or limitations on rights which people have held for years. The anonymity of a swingers site just makes it easier for the hateful speech in the thread above to flow freely. They hide their faces because they know society will judge theirs for their kinks, fetishes, or other sexual proclivities, but are quite happy to throw hate at anyone who doesn’t confirm to their own version of ‘normal’. " Why is it deemed hateful to say wee disagree with someone? This is an adult site. Adults should be able to disagree without name calling? I don't hate anyone on here. Why would I hate people who I have never met? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x" Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? " Trans doesn't bother me as a term. It doesn't apply to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Me personally feel uneasy calling someone them.its rude to me.if she or he looks like a female or male I'm saying him or her.Sorry if that offends you but its a fekn headfu*k to ask folk to know instinctively what you want to be known as. Okay, but what if they ASKED you to? " I did ask them and they went mental at me for for being transphibic and denying their existence. Sound familiar? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? Trans doesn't bother me as a term. It doesn't apply to me." And thats great. You would be amazed though at the types of responses people have posted on the various threads in these forums. The transphobia is rife on this site which is crazy. Not just the disagreement about pronouns/terminology but actual, bilious hate being spewed. Aren't we all just here for a good time?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x" That’s literally the reason why this thread was made. OP doesn’t like to be called a cis-man. Seems to be something small or slight thing, no? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? Trans doesn't bother me as a term. It doesn't apply to me. And thats great. You would be amazed though at the types of responses people have posted on the various threads in these forums. The transphobia is rife on this site which is crazy. Not just the disagreement about pronouns/terminology but actual, bilious hate being spewed. Aren't we all just here for a good time?!" I've been called transphobic, a bigot, a TERF and told to fuck off for expressing the above views. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? " I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry did I miss the hateful speech? Again on this forum too many take disagreeing with someone as hate speech or personal attacks. We are all ment to be grown adults not kids throwing their toys out a pram because God forbid someone has a different opinion. " It depends on what your opinion is about though. Contrary to popular belief, opinions CAN be wrong and some should be condemned. Nobody is saying that there’s hate speech in this thread, but there have been some threads with some very questionable, bigoted and downright hateful “opinions”. You wouldn’t be encouraging people to have differing opinions about racism, would you? We can all agree that is factually something that should be fought against. It’s the same idea when discussing people’s sexuality/gender identity etc. We should all be agreeing that being tolerant, respectful and accepting of people is the way forward, yet it’s still something that’s being debated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x" Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x" In your opinion, for what reason can that question not be addressed to women? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x " Of course I do. Do you honestly think I would identify myself as anything else? I'm not a man and I'm not trans, that does not apply to me. What do you identify as? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread smells of Tory" Quote stinks of I don't agree so I brand it Tory and I can pigeon hole it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Me personally feel uneasy calling someone them.its rude to me.if she or he looks like a female or male I'm saying him or her.Sorry if that offends you but its a fekn headfu*k to ask folk to know instinctively what you want to be known as." You’re so close to getting the whole point here. Gender identify can be confusing. You are unlikely to have heard of the concept of ‘non binary’ in relation to gender before now. We’ve known for a while, though, in polite society that intentionally misgendering a trans or NB person is rude and deeply offensive. Normalising setting out which pronouns you use is exactly to avoid any guessing and reduce the chances of accidental misgendering. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x Of course I do. Do you honestly think I would identify myself as anything else? I'm not a man and I'm not trans, that does not apply to me. What do you identify as?" Looks like we’re just a couple of CIS-women then x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x " Sex is observed at birth. Not assigned. None of my midwife friends have ever had to have a wee confab as there was some confusion over the sex of a baby they delivered. (And intersex is a whole other debate before someone jumps in with that one, it has bugger all to do with trans). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x Sex is observed at birth. Not assigned. None of my midwife friends have ever had to have a wee confab as there was some confusion over the sex of a baby they delivered. (And intersex is a whole other debate before someone jumps in with that one, it has bugger all to do with trans)." Sex and gender are different. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x Of course I do. Do you honestly think I would identify myself as anything else? I'm not a man and I'm not trans, that does not apply to me. What do you identify as?" There was a similar moral panic when “straight” and “heterosexual” started to be used to indicate “not gay/bi”. If your objection to the term is because to you it simply means “normal”, you might want to consider why that would be a problem. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x " And there's the issue. She is, by definition, a woman, not a cis-woman. Because that is her preferred pronoun. Why can't she be called woman? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x Sex is observed at birth. Not assigned. None of my midwife friends have ever had to have a wee confab as there was some confusion over the sex of a baby they delivered. (And intersex is a whole other debate before someone jumps in with that one, it has bugger all to do with trans). Sex and gender are different. " How many genders are there? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh fgs does it really matter? The world has gone mad for labelling! " Only ones I'm interested in are the yellow ones as they get snapped up for his dinner | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x And there's the issue. She is, by definition, a woman, not a cis-woman. Because that is her preferred pronoun. Why can't she be called woman? " I don’t think you understand what a pronoun is. If she’s a cis woman, I imagine the pronouns she uses are she/her. Certainly those are the pronouns you’ve been using for her without any issue. If you didn’t know they were a woman, I’m quite sure you could use “they” without any issue. “Cis woman” doesn’t replace “woman” it’s a sub set. In the same way as “tall woman” or “German woman” or “kind woman” are all descriptive sets. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x And there's the issue. She is, by definition, a woman, not a cis-woman. Because that is her preferred pronoun. Why can't she be called woman? " As already explained to you earlier in the thread, “cis” is not the same as the typical he/him, she/her, they/them pronouns. It’s just used for describing someone who identifies as the gender assigned to them at birth. It’s a very useful term, especially in conversations like this where you may want to differentiate someone who is cis versus someone who is trans. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x And there's the issue. She is, by definition, a woman, not a cis-woman. Because that is her preferred pronoun. Why can't she be called woman? I don’t think you understand what a pronoun is. If she’s a cis woman, I imagine the pronouns she uses are she/her. Certainly those are the pronouns you’ve been using for her without any issue. If you didn’t know they were a woman, I’m quite sure you could use “they” without any issue. “Cis woman” doesn’t replace “woman” it’s a sub set. In the same way as “tall woman” or “German woman” or “kind woman” are all descriptive sets." Great explanation, far better than mine! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x And there's the issue. She is, by definition, a woman, not a cis-woman. Because that is her preferred pronoun. Why can't she be called woman? I don’t think you understand what a pronoun is. If she’s a cis woman, I imagine the pronouns she uses are she/her. Certainly those are the pronouns you’ve been using for her without any issue. If you didn’t know they were a woman, I’m quite sure you could use “they” without any issue. “Cis woman” doesn’t replace “woman” it’s a sub set. In the same way as “tall woman” or “German woman” or “kind woman” are all descriptive sets." What is a woman? (Extra points for giving us a definition without using the word "woman") | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. " It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who cares? If you’re annoyed by a 3 letter prefix you need to get your priorities sorted. How often are you realistically going to be referred to as ‘cis’ in day to day life anyway? If it makes things easier for others then it’s all good in my eyes " That's my take on it too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x And there's the issue. She is, by definition, a woman, not a cis-woman. Because that is her preferred pronoun. Why can't she be called woman? As already explained to you earlier in the thread, “cis” is not the same as the typical he/him, she/her, they/them pronouns. It’s just used for describing someone who identifies as the gender assigned to them at birth. It’s a very useful term, especially in conversations like this where you may want to differentiate someone who is cis versus someone who is trans. " I think you knew what i meant. Woman who started as a woman and remains a woman = cis-woman. Woman who started as a man = woman, not trans woman? Why are they so offended by being called what they are instead of pushing women out of the term woman and taking it over? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am a woman. I only learned what cis stood for very recently. I’m still a woman." Yes. No-one is suggesting you aren’t. A trans woman is also a woman. Them being a woman doesn’t make you any less a woman. You are a cis woman and they are a trans woman. The only time you need to worry about anyone using ‘cis’ to describe you is if they are describing you as being distinct from trans women. But you’re still a woman. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am a woman. I only learned what cis stood for very recently. I’m still a woman." Yeah, you’re a woman, but you’re also a cis woman x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What is a woman? (Extra points for giving us a definition without using the word "woman")" That’s not how language (or science) works. I could ask you the same question but to define a chair (without using the word chair or the word table). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. " And this is where we disagree. I'm a man, they are a trans man. I, and many others, don't accept they are a man. Thats not offensive, not hate speech and certainly doesnt degrade them or refuse their existence. It calls them what they are, they just don't like it. Being offended doesn't automatically mean you're right. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then obviously I'd do it. That's manners. In real life I know trans people and never ever had any of them had their knickers in a twist as much as folk on here about correct pronouns. I'm pretty sure it's because people get offended by the slightest thing. Something is said and it always gets twisted and or taken out of context in some way x Like those being irritated by the use of cis/trans? I'm certainly not irritated by it as I am not cis or trans. That's really not a question that should be directed at women x Do you identify as a woman? If that’s the gender you were assigned at birth then you are, by definition, a cis-woman x And there's the issue. She is, by definition, a woman, not a cis-woman. Because that is her preferred pronoun. Why can't she be called woman? I don’t think you understand what a pronoun is. If she’s a cis woman, I imagine the pronouns she uses are she/her. Certainly those are the pronouns you’ve been using for her without any issue. If you didn’t know they were a woman, I’m quite sure you could use “they” without any issue. “Cis woman” doesn’t replace “woman” it’s a sub set. In the same way as “tall woman” or “German woman” or “kind woman” are all descriptive sets. Great explanation, far better than mine! " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. And this is where we disagree. I'm a man, they are a trans man. I, and many others, don't accept they are a man. Thats not offensive, not hate speech and certainly doesnt degrade them or refuse their existence. It calls them what they are, they just don't like it. Being offended doesn't automatically mean you're right. " Okay I was waiting for you to eventually just admit that your problem isn’t a 3 letter prefix, but rather a deeper intolerance against other people. That makes a lot more sense now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. And this is where we disagree. I'm a man, they are a trans man. I, and many others, don't accept they are a man. Thats not offensive, not hate speech and certainly doesnt degrade them or refuse their existence. It calls them what they are, they just don't like it. Being offended doesn't automatically mean you're right. " If it’s just a name why not use the terms real woman and non biological woman? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. And this is where we disagree. I'm a man, they are a trans man. I, and many others, don't accept they are a man. Thats not offensive, not hate speech and certainly doesnt degrade them or refuse their existence. It calls them what they are, they just don't like it. Being offended doesn't automatically mean you're right. " Okay. A couple of things. Apologies for misgendering you - I read “Gina” and my mind filled in the blanks. You don’t appear to be too offended, so that’s good. Just in case though, it was unintentional and not an attempt to point-score. I can’t agree with your “they just don’t like it” argument. There are all sorts of reasons why saying things like that is wrong. Someone might not think that immigrants to these shores can be “British/Scottish”. To quietly seethe at this injustice is your lookout. To loudly and repeatedly claim that they’re not and never will be “British/Scottish” and to take to Internet forums to state that case over and over again would be the actions of someone who is racist. This is an imperfect comparison for a number of reasons, but my point isn’t about the philosophy of what makes a “woman” or what makes a “Brit”, my point is about the social blind-spot many people seem to have about this issue and who don’t seem to care who they hurt when throwing their opinions around. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry but your very angry at alot of folk. As much as you can say it until your red blue or pink in the face women born woman and choose to stay women will never use the term cis women." You’re simply wrong about that. Aside from your problematic use of “choose” there, it’s simply not true. There are plenty cis women who do agree with you. But there are also plenty who don’t. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. And this is where we disagree. I'm a man, they are a trans man. I, and many others, don't accept they are a man. Thats not offensive, not hate speech and certainly doesnt degrade them or refuse their existence. It calls them what they are, they just don't like it. Being offended doesn't automatically mean you're right. Okay I was waiting for you to eventually just admit that your problem isn’t a 3 letter prefix, but rather a deeper intolerance against other people. That makes a lot more sense now. " You disagree therefore you're intolerant. That didn't take long. I win the bullshit bingo round with that remark | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As I said I had to Google the term so new 1 on me.hence why I'd say most wouldn't." I think you’re right. The reason a lot of people wouldn’t use it is that they don’t know it exists, never mind what it means. I genuinely hope we’ve been able to help you understand a little more about what it means and why it is used… and maybe make it a little less threatening or frightening for you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. And this is where we disagree. I'm a man, they are a trans man. I, and many others, don't accept they are a man. Thats not offensive, not hate speech and certainly doesnt degrade them or refuse their existence. It calls them what they are, they just don't like it. Being offended doesn't automatically mean you're right. If it’s just a name why not use the terms real woman and non biological woman?" SNP terminology used for adverts for smear test invites for "persons with a uterus" ffs Women have a uterus. The world is going mad. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. And this is where we disagree. I'm a man, they are a trans man. I, and many others, don't accept they are a man. Thats not offensive, not hate speech and certainly doesnt degrade them or refuse their existence. It calls them what they are, they just don't like it. Being offended doesn't automatically mean you're right. Okay. A couple of things. Apologies for misgendering you - I read “Gina” and my mind filled in the blanks. You don’t appear to be too offended, so that’s good. Just in case though, it was unintentional and not an attempt to point-score. I can’t agree with your “they just don’t like it” argument. There are all sorts of reasons why saying things like that is wrong. Someone might not think that immigrants to these shores can be “British/Scottish”. To quietly seethe at this injustice is your lookout. To loudly and repeatedly claim that they’re not and never will be “British/Scottish” and to take to Internet forums to state that case over and over again would be the actions of someone who is racist. This is an imperfect comparison for a number of reasons, but my point isn’t about the philosophy of what makes a “woman” or what makes a “Brit”, my point is about the social blind-spot many people seem to have about this issue and who don’t seem to care who they hurt when throwing their opinions around. " No offence taken, you've not been rude and hopefully I've not been rude back. I don't want to get off topic regarding the brit thing so I'll keep it on track although I get what you're meaning with the similarity. Language is not set in stone, it changes over time as society changes. My issue is the minority, and trans are a minority, seem to be making a mountain out of a molehill regarding the use of the word female or woman. They are a very noisy minority and the main bulk of people disagree with what they are doing to the words. Being in disagreement with someone is not hatred of the person or an attqck on them, certainly not in this case, its a disagreement on the use of the english language. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What is a woman? (Extra points for giving us a definition without using the word "woman") That’s not how language (or science) works. I could ask you the same question but to define a chair (without using the word chair or the word table). " Chair: (noun) a separate seat for one person, typically with a back and four legs. Woman: (noun) an adult female human being. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. And this is where we disagree. I'm a man, they are a trans man. I, and many others, don't accept they are a man. Thats not offensive, not hate speech and certainly doesnt degrade them or refuse their existence. It calls them what they are, they just don't like it. Being offended doesn't automatically mean you're right. Okay. A couple of things. Apologies for misgendering you - I read “Gina” and my mind filled in the blanks. You don’t appear to be too offended, so that’s good. Just in case though, it was unintentional and not an attempt to point-score. I can’t agree with your “they just don’t like it” argument. There are all sorts of reasons why saying things like that is wrong. Someone might not think that immigrants to these shores can be “British/Scottish”. To quietly seethe at this injustice is your lookout. To loudly and repeatedly claim that they’re not and never will be “British/Scottish” and to take to Internet forums to state that case over and over again would be the actions of someone who is racist. This is an imperfect comparison for a number of reasons, but my point isn’t about the philosophy of what makes a “woman” or what makes a “Brit”, my point is about the social blind-spot many people seem to have about this issue and who don’t seem to care who they hurt when throwing their opinions around. No offence taken, you've not been rude and hopefully I've not been rude back. I don't want to get off topic regarding the brit thing so I'll keep it on track although I get what you're meaning with the similarity. Language is not set in stone, it changes over time as society changes. My issue is the minority, and trans are a minority, seem to be making a mountain out of a molehill regarding the use of the word female or woman. They are a very noisy minority and the main bulk of people disagree with what they are doing to the words. Being in disagreement with someone is not hatred of the person or an attqck on them, certainly not in this case, its a disagreement on the use of the english language. " That’s just it though. Minorities always seem to be being noisy, unreasonable or making demands. Thankfully society changes and develops and we get better. I don’t think it’s fair to say a majority of people disagree. I think an equally vocal minority disagree and am the vast majority are unaware than anyone even wants their opinion. That aside… it wasn’t too long ago a majority didn’t want equal marriage. It’s not too long ago a majority wanted gay sex to stay in the statute books. It’s not too long ago a majority had no issue with using a slur on a shop owner’s ethnicity as a description of the shop. It’s not too long ago a majority thought it was ridiculous to spend money on reasonable adjustments for disabled people. It’s not too long ago a majority thought poor people and their children were a fine source of labour. No one would have identified it as hatred in the 70s and 80s for kids to make a childish rhyme about south East Asians while pulling the corners of their eyes in different directions. We recognise it as hate now when Jim Davidson does it on stage, but back then there was no overt ill will or malice. That doesn’t mean it was any less shitty a way to behave. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What is a woman? (Extra points for giving us a definition without using the word "woman") That’s not how language (or science) works. I could ask you the same question but to define a chair (without using the word chair or the word table). Chair: (noun) a separate seat for one person, typically with a back and four legs. Woman: (noun) an adult female human being. " So is a stool a chair? It is a seat for one person with four legs and as you’ve said, some chairs don’t have backs. (You were always either going to also describe a bench, a stool or a horse… the point stands that that’s not how language works). I can define a kilogram precisely - but only in relation to another measure, or a known quantity/standard example. Someone has to point to something and agree “that’s a kilogram”. For mass there is only one variable to argue about (but argue they do). There are a lot of variables in a person. Is a woman with short hair still a woman (and does calling her a short-haired woman erase women?). Is a woman with no breasts still a woman…? A woman with no ovaries…? … no uterus? How much of the descriptive features can you deviate from before your definition fails? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As I said I had to Google the term so new 1 on me.hence why I'd say most wouldn't. I think you’re right. The reason a lot of people wouldn’t use it is that they don’t know it exists, never mind what it means. I genuinely hope we’ve been able to help you understand a little more about what it means and why it is used… and maybe make it a little less threatening or frightening for you. " excuse me? Your talking to me as if I'm a child. Threatening? How the hell can someone being known as them that of whatever seem threatening to me? Ps..I'm not afraid of the dark either ffs So condescending! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" my point is about the social blind-spot many people seem to have about this issue and who don’t seem to care who they hurt when throwing their opinions around. " this is in your opinion of course , I'm hurt that you could say such a thing ( not really) but just making a point . Newsflash bud, opinions are exactly what they are , opinions, if someone is hurt by them or offended by them that's just tough tittie. Being offended does not mean the other person was offensive, Cis man or woman up ffs, i couldn't care less what a person identifys as but don't preach every 5 minutes about it or take a hissy fit if I Address you wrongly. I'm a penguin by the way so would be very hurt if you don't call me mr penguin going forward. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" my point is about the social blind-spot many people seem to have about this issue and who don’t seem to care who they hurt when throwing their opinions around. this is in your opinion of course , I'm hurt that you could say such a thing ( not really) but just making a point . Newsflash bud, opinions are exactly what they are , opinions, if someone is hurt by them or offended by them that's just tough tittie. Being offended does not mean the other person was offensive, Cis man or woman up ffs, i couldn't care less what a person identifys as but don't preach every 5 minutes about it or take a hissy fit if I Address you wrongly. I'm a penguin by the way so would be very hurt if you don't call me mr penguin going forward. " New profile name Zest? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very good, but yet again the question is not answered. Why can't a woman just be called a woman if that is the desired term? And it has replaced woman in the trans community. And how come its ok for a man to say they are a woman but not a woman? They are called cis-woman instead. It hasn’t though. You’re a woman. I have no issue with that. A trans woman is also a woman. The difference between you (one of them) is that you’re a cis woman and they’re a trans woman. I’m a man. A trans man is also a man. They’re a trans man and I’m a cis man. We’re both men. Them existing makes me no less a man. Me existing makes then no less a man. And this is where we disagree. I'm a man, they are a trans man. I, and many others, don't accept they are a man. Thats not offensive, not hate speech and certainly doesnt degrade them or refuse their existence. It calls them what they are, they just don't like it. Being offended doesn't automatically mean you're right. Okay. A couple of things. Apologies for misgendering you - I read “Gina” and my mind filled in the blanks. You don’t appear to be too offended, so that’s good. Just in case though, it was unintentional and not an attempt to point-score. I can’t agree with your “they just don’t like it” argument. There are all sorts of reasons why saying things like that is wrong. Someone might not think that immigrants to these shores can be “British/Scottish”. To quietly seethe at this injustice is your lookout. To loudly and repeatedly claim that they’re not and never will be “British/Scottish” and to take to Internet forums to state that case over and over again would be the actions of someone who is racist. This is an imperfect comparison for a number of reasons, but my point isn’t about the philosophy of what makes a “woman” or what makes a “Brit”, my point is about the social blind-spot many people seem to have about this issue and who don’t seem to care who they hurt when throwing their opinions around. No offence taken, you've not been rude and hopefully I've not been rude back. I don't want to get off topic regarding the brit thing so I'll keep it on track although I get what you're meaning with the similarity. Language is not set in stone, it changes over time as society changes. My issue is the minority, and trans are a minority, seem to be making a mountain out of a molehill regarding the use of the word female or woman. They are a very noisy minority and the main bulk of people disagree with what they are doing to the words. Being in disagreement with someone is not hatred of the person or an attqck on them, certainly not in this case, its a disagreement on the use of the english language. That’s just it though. Minorities always seem to be being noisy, unreasonable or making demands. Thankfully society changes and develops and we get better. I don’t think it’s fair to say a majority of people disagree. I think an equally vocal minority disagree and am the vast majority are unaware than anyone even wants their opinion. That aside… it wasn’t too long ago a majority didn’t want equal marriage. It’s not too long ago a majority wanted gay sex to stay in the statute books. It’s not too long ago a majority had no issue with using a slur on a shop owner’s ethnicity as a description of the shop. It’s not too long ago a majority thought it was ridiculous to spend money on reasonable adjustments for disabled people. It’s not too long ago a majority thought poor people and their children were a fine source of labour. No one would have identified it as hatred in the 70s and 80s for kids to make a childish rhyme about south East Asians while pulling the corners of their eyes in different directions. We recognise it as hate now when Jim Davidson does it on stage, but back then there was no overt ill will or malice. That doesn’t mean it was any less shitty a way to behave. " Ethnic minorities, gay men and lesbian women were never identifying into another category of society and impacting on their rights. They stood on their own in their communities. They simply wanted to right to live freely without fear or discrimination. Some (not all) trans women fail to appreciate the genuine concerns of women when a person born male, with a fully developed male body is allowed access to female only spaces. What about men identifying as TW and being transferred to womens prisons. Women's prisons....a population who are extremely likely to have been exposed to male violence or sexual abuse in their lives. And you're expecting them to share a cell with a biological man? Or does the "be kind" mantra not extend to them because they're in prison? What about women in domestic abuse shelters? Again victims of male violence? Is it fair to expect them to share a confined space with a biological man who identifies as a woman (and most likely means them absolutely no harm!) but still acts as a visual reminder of everything they fear? And I don't feel the same about trans men (biological women) They do not pose the same threat to men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is getting ridiculous, people are so concerned about being politically correct that common sense doesn't seem to exist anymore." Says it all when one of the most sensible posts comes from an avatar of a pair of Gregory's on a boabie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It smells of something! " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" my point is about the social blind-spot many people seem to have about this issue and who don’t seem to care who they hurt when throwing their opinions around. this is in your opinion of course , I'm hurt that you could say such a thing ( not really) but just making a point . Newsflash bud, opinions are exactly what they are , opinions, if someone is hurt by them or offended by them that's just tough tittie. Being offended does not mean the other person was offensive, Cis man or woman up ffs, i couldn't care less what a person identifys as but don't preach every 5 minutes about it or take a hissy fit if I Address you wrongly. I'm a penguin by the way so would be very hurt if you don't call me mr penguin going forward. New profile name Zest? " Done x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Ethnic minorities, gay men and lesbian women were never identifying into another category of society and impacting on their rights. They stood on their own in their communities. They simply wanted to right to live freely without fear or discrimination. Some (not all) trans women fail to appreciate the genuine concerns of women when a person born male, with a fully developed male body is allowed access to female only spaces. What about men identifying as TW and being transferred to womens prisons. Women's prisons....a population who are extremely likely to have been exposed to male violence or sexual abuse in their lives. And you're expecting them to share a cell with a biological man? Or does the "be kind" mantra not extend to them because they're in prison? What about women in domestic abuse shelters? Again victims of male violence? Is it fair to expect them to share a confined space with a biological man who identifies as a woman (and most likely means them absolutely no harm!) but still acts as a visual reminder of everything they fear? And I don't feel the same about trans men (biological women) They do not pose the same threat to men. " Your understanding of queer history and the history of race relations is very different from mine. The equality act contains exemptions for exactly the scenario you describe in prisons. Where risks are so high a blanket decision in any direction would be wrong, so a case by case approach is taken (certainly within HMPS and SPS). Your domestic abuse shelter example is more tricky and requires far more nuance than we can get into here - but again, I’d point to the equality act and the official guidance to that act which sets out the level of exceptional circumstances which would need to apply to use the statutory exemptions. In any case the status quo has been in place since EA2010 was enacted, so any changes you’re talking about would require the rolling back of existing rights and not the granting of any new ones. “Self ID” is one of the most unhelpful terms around as people assume it to confer access to “single sex spaces”. It doesn’t. The EA2010 takes care of that. The proposed GRA reforms are about the process of obtaining a GRC - which the EA2010 specifically states is not a factor in establishing whether a person is entitled to protections under that act. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I mean, I’ve been called worse in my time. If someone feels comfortable calling me a cis man, I can’t stop them. So what’s the point in caring? Live and let live. They can’t force you to like it any more than you can force them to stop saying it." This reminds me of an old saying ( You be you and I'll be me ) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This reminds me of an old saying ( You be you and I'll be me ) " Exactly this There are bigger worries in the world than this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So here is my limited understanding of this, everyone want to be treated fairly and equally. So what we are aiming for is equality for all, is this correct? Will anyone be offended if I refer to them as a person? And when speaking to them directly I can use their name? Hi everyone my name's Jim. " hi Jim | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So here is my limited understanding of this, everyone want to be treated fairly and equally. So what we are aiming for is equality for all, is this correct? Will anyone be offended if I refer to them as a person? And when speaking to them directly I can use their name? Hi everyone my name's Jim. hi Jim " Hi | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This reminds me of an old saying ( You be you and I'll be me ) Exactly this There are bigger worries in the world than this." I couldn't agree more. I'd never even heard of "cis" until a few days ago lol x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This reminds me of an old saying ( You be you and I'll be me ) Exactly this There are bigger worries in the world than this. I couldn't agree more. I'd never even heard of "cis" until a few days ago lol x" I thought it was a thread about cjs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This reminds me of an old saying ( You be you and I'll be me ) Exactly this There are bigger worries in the world than this. I couldn't agree more. I'd never even heard of "cis" until a few days ago lol x I thought it was a thread about cjs " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've learned something new today though, cis is derived from Latin " I first encountered it as a prefix in chemistry so the first time I heard it being used in this context, it was much easier to understand the terminology thankfully C x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've learned something new today though, cis is derived from Latin I first encountered it as a prefix in chemistry so the first time I heard it being used in this context, it was much easier to understand the terminology thankfully C x" Whats the opposite of Cis? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've learned something new today though, cis is derived from Latin I first encountered it as a prefix in chemistry so the first time I heard it being used in this context, it was much easier to understand the terminology thankfully C x Whats the opposite of Cis?" That would be trans At least in the geometric/configurational isomerism respect at least. Had to rewrite that a couple times cause I made a right arse of posting haha C x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've learned something new today though, cis is derived from Latin I first encountered it as a prefix in chemistry so the first time I heard it being used in this context, it was much easier to understand the terminology thankfully C x Whats the opposite of Cis? That would be trans At least in the geometric/configurational isomerism respect at least. Had to rewrite that a couple times cause I made a right arse of posting haha C x " Thanks. The two deleted posts added drama | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I can understand why some people don’t feel like they fit within traditional gender roles but at the same time wow the list is exhausting Personally I’m female, born female still female no intention to be anything other than female CIS - to me means construction industry scheme lol why after 40years should I be forced to change how I see my gender ? I’m not forcing anyone else to me male female or trans ! I accept that others want to find an alternative for themselves but at the same time respect works both ways don’t try force me to change when I’ve been accepting and supportive of you ! " That's the thing though, the use of the term cis doesn't force you to change how you see your gender. You see your gender exactly the way cis defines it. All it does in reality is add a handy descriptor for your gender to those who might appreciate that consideration. C x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I can understand why some people don’t feel like they fit within traditional gender roles but at the same time wow the list is exhausting Personally I’m female, born female still female no intention to be anything other than female CIS - to me means construction industry scheme lol why after 40years should I be forced to change how I see my gender ? I’m not forcing anyone else to me male female or trans ! I accept that others want to find an alternative for themselves but at the same time respect works both ways don’t try force me to change when I’ve been accepting and supportive of you ! That's the thing though, the use of the term cis doesn't force you to change how you see your gender. You see your gender exactly the way cis defines it. All it does in reality is add a handy descriptor for your gender to those who might appreciate that consideration. C x" Exactly this. The really key thing (as discussed in other threads…!) is that if you’re a cis man, or a cis woman, that’s nobody’s business but your own unless you want them to know. I happen to be quite happy letting you all know I’m a cis man. I’m happy to let some people know what I’m packing in my pants. And I’m happy to let some people know what, if any, surgery I’ve had on that package. But if I choose not to tell you…. That’s fine. Because I’m a man. It doesn’t matter if you assume I’m cis or assume I’m trans. It might be relevant at some point, in which case ‘cis’ provides a useful descriptor for the set to which I belong. I’m also a person with coeliac disease. All people with coeliac disease are people. Not all people are people with coeliac disease. Having this handy description is useful when deciding whether to give me the good bread or the shit bread. I suspect some folk on this thread might not want to give me any bread though, and that’s fine, because I’m also an overweight man (another descriptive set) and I should be kept away from bread as I can’t be trusted with it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I can understand why some people don’t feel like they fit within traditional gender roles but at the same time wow the list is exhausting Personally I’m female, born female still female no intention to be anything other than female CIS - to me means construction industry scheme lol why after 40years should I be forced to change how I see my gender ? I’m not forcing anyone else to me male female or trans ! I accept that others want to find an alternative for themselves but at the same time respect works both ways don’t try force me to change when I’ve been accepting and supportive of you ! That's the thing though, the use of the term cis doesn't force you to change how you see your gender. You see your gender exactly the way cis defines it. All it does in reality is add a handy descriptor for your gender to those who might appreciate that consideration. C x Exactly this. The really key thing (as discussed in other threads…!) is that if you’re a cis man, or a cis woman, that’s nobody’s business but your own unless you want them to know. I happen to be quite happy letting you all know I’m a cis man. I’m happy to let some people know what I’m packing in my pants. And I’m happy to let some people know what, if any, surgery I’ve had on that package. But if I choose not to tell you…. That’s fine. Because I’m a man. It doesn’t matter if you assume I’m cis or assume I’m trans. It might be relevant at some point, in which case ‘cis’ provides a useful descriptor for the set to which I belong. I’m also a person with coeliac disease. All people with coeliac disease are people. Not all people are people with coeliac disease. Having this handy description is useful when deciding whether to give me the good bread or the shit bread. I suspect some folk on this thread might not want to give me any bread though, and that’s fine, because I’m also an overweight man (another descriptive set) and I should be kept away from bread as I can’t be trusted with it. " after all that I'm sure you'd get a piece at anybody's door | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand how after over 100 replies to the thread people still don’t understand the use of the word of the cis prefix. It’s literally just used as an extra word to clarify whether you’re cis or trans, that’s it. All these replies stating “i’m not a cis woman, I’m just a woman”. Yeah you’re a woman, but you are *also* a cis woman. Fucking hell, it’s so basic. " Is it possible that they understand it but just don't like it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is a bit off topic, but why do we need to have additional names/words to define us? There will never be enough, to try and distinguish me from the rest would take a mountain of pronouns. I can simply do it in 3 words, I am me. No one else in the world is the same as me. I agree 100% that we all need to accept each other for who we are, all equal. But we don't need to further divide ourselves into different boxes. Treat other how you would want to be treated. In the words of two great philosophers "Be Excellent to each other"" That’s fine until I decide I want a slice of Jim on my aforementioned piece. Descriptive language is how we (most of us, mostly) interact with each other in the world. Jim isn’t into people like me… isn’t there a name for that? How do you soften the blow (remember I’m already coming to terms with the shit bread, now you’re telling me I’m not getting any Jim filling) without using descriptive language. Without adjectives, nouns, noun adjuncts… pronouns, even. How do we tell each other what we’d like to do to each other without gently peppering our speech with more adverbs than a first year doing their first creative writing essay? Words and how we use them do matter, that’s why my dietician at the coeliac clinic sensitively highlights that I’m in the “overweight” group, and that I should try cutting down on the amount of gluten free bread I eat as it’s more calorific than regular bread… rather than saying “you’re a fat fuck, I don’t care what you want to hear, but you need to put the toast down”. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is a bit off topic, but why do we need to have additional names/words to define us? There will never be enough, to try and distinguish me from the rest would take a mountain of pronouns. I can simply do it in 3 words, I am me. No one else in the world is the same as me. I agree 100% that we all need to accept each other for who we are, all equal. But we don't need to further divide ourselves into different boxes. Treat other how you would want to be treated. In the words of two great philosophers "Be Excellent to each other" That’s fine until I decide I want a slice of Jim on my aforementioned piece. Descriptive language is how we (most of us, mostly) interact with each other in the world. Jim isn’t into people like me… isn’t there a name for that? How do you soften the blow (remember I’m already coming to terms with the shit bread, now you’re telling me I’m not getting any Jim filling) without using descriptive language. Without adjectives, nouns, noun adjuncts… pronouns, even. How do we tell each other what we’d like to do to each other without gently peppering our speech with more adverbs than a first year doing their first creative writing essay? Words and how we use them do matter, that’s why my dietician at the coeliac clinic sensitively highlights that I’m in the “overweight” group, and that I should try cutting down on the amount of gluten free bread I eat as it’s more calorific than regular bread… rather than saying “you’re a fat fuck, I don’t care what you want to hear, but you need to put the toast down”. " I disagree. I think you are exaggerating to make your point. I at no point said we need to stop using words to describe what we like want or think at any point. My point is we need to stop thinking of new ways to divide ourselves from each other, where does it end? The goal is simple equality for all. No amount of words can describe a person, we are all constantly changing, the only thing I know of that can't change is my species. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I disagree. I think you are exaggerating to make your point. I at no point said we need to stop using words to describe what we like want or think at any point. My point is we need to stop thinking of new ways to divide ourselves from each other, where does it end? The goal is simple equality for all. No amount of words can describe a person, we are all constantly changing, the only thing I know of that can't change is my species." I was, of course. As you clearly were by saying you need only three words to describe yourself. As was said to you (and you agreed) in another thread you can’t “all lives matter” this kind of thing. Currently all lives don’t seem to matter the same and we all need to stand up and fight for those who are oppressed. And while equality is a laudable goal… we’re a long way off so we can’t just sit back and ‘treat everyone the same’, because that’s not really equality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand how after over 100 replies to the thread people still don’t understand the use of the word of the cis prefix. It’s literally just used as an extra word to clarify whether you’re cis or trans, that’s it. All these replies stating “i’m not a cis woman, I’m just a woman”. Yeah you’re a woman, but you are *also* a cis woman. Fucking hell, it’s so basic. " I get it, I just don’t want to use it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What a loada pish. Arguing over letters of the fuckin alphabet Man Woman Thread closed" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand how after over 100 replies to the thread people still don’t understand the use of the word of the cis prefix. It’s literally just used as an extra word to clarify whether you’re cis or trans, that’s it. All these replies stating “i’m not a cis woman, I’m just a woman”. Yeah you’re a woman, but you are *also* a cis woman. Fucking hell, it’s so basic. I get it, I just don’t want to use it. " Neither do I and shall not be told that I have to use it either x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand how after over 100 replies to the thread people still don’t understand the use of the word of the cis prefix. It’s literally just used as an extra word to clarify whether you’re cis or trans, that’s it. All these replies stating “i’m not a cis woman, I’m just a woman”. Yeah you’re a woman, but you are *also* a cis woman. Fucking hell, it’s so basic. I get it, I just don’t want to use it. Neither do I and shall not be told that I have to use it either x" Where has anyone said you have to use it? You don’t like it. Fine. You don’t want to use it. Also fine. You seem to be very upset about something that hasn’t happened and doesn’t affect you if you don’t want it to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand how after over 100 replies to the thread people still don’t understand the use of the word of the cis prefix. It’s literally just used as an extra word to clarify whether you’re cis or trans, that’s it. All these replies stating “i’m not a cis woman, I’m just a woman”. Yeah you’re a woman, but you are *also* a cis woman. Fucking hell, it’s so basic. I get it, I just don’t want to use it. Neither do I and shall not be told that I have to use it either x Where has anyone said you have to use it? You don’t like it. Fine. You don’t want to use it. Also fine. You seem to be very upset about something that hasn’t happened and doesn’t affect you if you don’t want it to. " I'm not upset about it all. I really couldn't give a shit about it anyway. You seem to be the one carrying on with this thread, not me. Have a rest from it lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It’s literally just used as an extra word to clarify whether you’re cis or trans, that’s it. All these replies stating “i’m not a cis woman, I’m just a woman”. Yeah you’re a woman, but you are *also* a cis woman. Fucking hell, it’s so basic. " No it's literally a word that is not required to clarify anything , your either a trans woman or a woman, trans man or man. Fuckin hell as you say its so basic. OR Is it so basic we need to change to see your point but you can't change to see anyone else's point . Sounds so basic but very likely in my opinion its the latter. ( hurtful , insulting, or offending as it may be) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"*shouts* jiiiiiiimmmmy " I'm ignoring you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy." I hate being called babe but that's a different thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread " You trying to hijack this thread! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! " Are you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? " Me! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! " Yeah you lol x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x" Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment " You have to eat another McPlant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You two get a room " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment You have to eat another McPlant " Anything but that! It was awful! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment You have to eat another McPlant Anything but that! It was awful!" Was it too green for you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment You have to eat another McPlant Anything but that! It was awful! Was it too green for you? " The burger tasted foul, i threwcit away and just ate the bun and the salad. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment You have to eat another McPlant Anything but that! It was awful! Was it too green for you? The burger tasted foul, i threwcit away and just ate the bun and the salad." Had to Google it as I've not been in McDonald's for ages. Since when did they go vegan? Give me KFC any day! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment You have to eat another McPlant Anything but that! It was awful! Was it too green for you? The burger tasted foul, i threwcit away and just ate the bun and the salad. Had to Google it as I've not been in McDonald's for ages. Since when did they go vegan? Give me KFC any day! " Its only a recent addition, I can't see it lasting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment You have to eat another McPlant Anything but that! It was awful! Was it too green for you? The burger tasted foul, i threwcit away and just ate the bun and the salad. Had to Google it as I've not been in McDonald's for ages. Since when did they go vegan? Give me KFC any day! Its only a recent addition, I can't see it lasting." I should hope not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment You have to eat another McPlant Anything but that! It was awful! Was it too green for you? The burger tasted foul, i threwcit away and just ate the bun and the salad. Had to Google it as I've not been in McDonald's for ages. Since when did they go vegan? Give me KFC any day! Its only a recent addition, I can't see it lasting. I should hope not " Seemed a strange idea to me, but I thought I would give it a go, you never know what you could be missing out on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Went from cis to mcds " I actually hijacked a thread, thats my cherry popped | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just call everyone darlin. Saves any hassle. Awrite gorgeous works well to. No one I have ever called gorgeous complains and tells me I'm wrong " Hawwwwwd oan… you haven’t called me gorgeous | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just call everyone darlin. Saves any hassle. Awrite gorgeous works well to. No one I have ever called gorgeous complains and tells me I'm wrong Hawwwwwd oan… you haven’t called me gorgeous " I've not been called darlin or gorgeous! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think everyone is far too sensitive to gender to be honest - but yes ultimately it is up to you how you want to define it. The one thing I will point out is that while you might not like the term 'cis' it is at most a minor inconvenience for you compared to literally the risk of trans people being murdered so your post comes across as very 'first world problems'. I'm not why you're asking only straight and bi people either since sexuality and gender are completely different things... but you knew that right?" Compared to trans people being murdered? Thats a huge jump in logic, what crime statistics confirm that comment? And if its not that much of an issue to call somwone what they want to be called then don't use the terminology at all when speaking about cis men, just call them men. Problem solved. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is the objection to Cis about you being called a cis female/male or is it to the use of cis female/male altogether? Personally I hate being called Jimmy. I hate being called babe but that's a different thread You trying to hijack this thread! Are you? Me! Yeah you lol x Ok, you caught me! What's my punishment You have to eat another McPlant Anything but that! It was awful! Was it too green for you? The burger tasted foul, i threwcit away and just ate the bun and the salad. Had to Google it as I've not been in McDonald's for ages. Since when did they go vegan? Give me KFC any day! Its only a recent addition, I can't see it lasting. I should hope not Seemed a strange idea to me, but I thought I would give it a go, you never know what you could be missing out on " Maybe you could enlighten me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just call everyone darlin. Saves any hassle. Awrite gorgeous works well to. No one I have ever called gorgeous complains and tells me I'm wrong Hawwwwwd oan… you haven’t called me gorgeous I've not been called darlin or gorgeous! " Morning darlin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just call everyone darlin. Saves any hassle. Awrite gorgeous works well to. No one I have ever called gorgeous complains and tells me I'm wrong Hawwwwwd oan… you haven’t called me gorgeous I've not been called darlin or gorgeous! Morning darlin " (Psst he’s a bit gorgeous isn’t he ) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just call everyone darlin. Saves any hassle. Awrite gorgeous works well to. No one I have ever called gorgeous complains and tells me I'm wrong Hawwwwwd oan… you haven’t called me gorgeous I've not been called darlin or gorgeous! Morning darlin (Psst he’s a bit gorgeous isn’t he ) " Whispers yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think everyone is far too sensitive to gender to be honest - but yes ultimately it is up to you how you want to define it. The one thing I will point out is that while you might not like the term 'cis' it is at most a minor inconvenience for you compared to literally the risk of trans people being murdered so your post comes across as very 'first world problems'. I'm not why you're asking only straight and bi people either since sexuality and gender are completely different things... but you knew that right?" How does me accepting to called Cis stop some fucking nutter from attacking a Trans person? And stats please too as mentioned. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think everyone is far too sensitive to gender to be honest - but yes ultimately it is up to you how you want to define it. The one thing I will point out is that while you might not like the term 'cis' it is at most a minor inconvenience for you compared to literally the risk of trans people being murdered so your post comes across as very 'first world problems'. " Tbf , going by the strong objections above , calling someone cis this or that might put you at much greater risk of that you speak. If the threat is as real as you make out surely antagonising the vast majorityof others requests NOT to be identified as you would like is a small concession to accept after all it is just " a small inconvenience " you would have. No ?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread still going " Aye. Some folk have just finished reading the stuff from yesterday and Googling new terminology. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread still going Aye. Some folk have just finished reading the stuff from yesterday and Googling new terminology. " Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This conversation really brings out the "I fear change" mob." I was taught to question stuff I don't agree with. Not everything comes down to fear and phobias. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |