FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Top Gun 2: Maverick
Top Gun 2: Maverick
Jump to: Newest in thread
Keep watching the trailer back and still I can't make up my mind...
Is this one step too far for Mr. cruise by making a sequel to his greatest ever movie, loved by millions, almost perfection??
Discuss people. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Nothing will ever beat the first one but I’m still curious where the new one will go |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Got to be worth a watch, even if just for the flight scenes |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It will be cheesy as fuck, just as it should be, will be watching. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Tom Cruise: The Movie
Probably won't see it. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
[Removed by poster at 07/08/19 22:06:45] |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Will be watching it you just gotta |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Definitely watching. Hope he doesn't just crash and burn...... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
See, the first one had Tom Cruise, it had val kilmer, it had Tom (I just cum in my knickers) skerrit, it had huge fucking loud aeroplanes that didn't help my already wet knickers from staring at Tom skerrit and it had cheese and 80's things.
Just about the most perfect package and NOW they've gone and done another one.
And I'm torn on whether I should move along and take a look or stay trapped in my 80's bubble with the first one. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"See, the first one had Tom Cruise, it had val kilmer, it had Tom (I just cum in my knickers) skerrit, it had huge fucking loud aeroplanes that didn't help my already wet knickers from staring at Tom skerrit and it had cheese and 80's things.
Just about the most perfect package and NOW they've gone and done another one.
And I'm torn on whether I should move along and take a look or stay trapped in my 80's bubble with the first one."
Exactly! It's an absolute classic of a film with an incredible, memorable theme song. Just another film that doesn't NEED a sequel. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Nothing will ever beat the first one but I’m still curious where the new one will go"
I recon that he’ll be a great pilot, have a crisis of confidence, struggle to be a great pilot until he meets a beautiful woman who helps reignite his confidence and he becomes an even better pilot........ |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
I can't wait to see it, Tom looks great in the preview but....it will never have the same effect on me as the original. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
And...AND! Why wait 33 fucking years to do it.
I'm just fucking on one now.
Someone out there is deliberately fucking with my calm with this.
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
"And...AND! Why wait 33 fucking years to do it.
I'm just fucking on one now.
Someone out there is deliberately fucking with my calm with this.
"
I read that Kelly McGuiness didn't know it was being made until after!! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"And...AND! Why wait 33 fucking years to do it.
I'm just fucking on one now.
Someone out there is deliberately fucking with my calm with this.
I read that Kelly McGuiness didn't know it was being made until after!! "
Oooooo. Now THATS a bit of an insult.
She was a major key star in the first one. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Cannot wait for this to hit screens. I don't care if people think it's tosh (you've decided that in the strength of a trailer, really?), or if they hate Tom Cruise.
I've decided I'm going to fuckin LOVE this movie, because I like fast planes, fast bikes, and Tom Cruise. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I can't decide.....
I really can't.
If I see it and it's bad I'm going to be soooo disappointed and if I don't see it and it's amazing I'm going to be devastated with myself.
I've not summed it up on the strength of a trailer, I'm just so much of a fan of the first one I just don't know if a sequel is necessary after 33 years. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And...AND! Why wait 33 fucking years to do it.
I'm just fucking on one now.
Someone out there is deliberately fucking with my calm with this.
I read that Kelly McGuiness didn't know it was being made until after!!
Oooooo. Now THATS a bit of an insult.
She was a major key star in the first one. "
Kelly McGillis stopped acting a long time ago.. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"And...AND! Why wait 33 fucking years to do it.
I'm just fucking on one now.
Someone out there is deliberately fucking with my calm with this.
I read that Kelly McGuiness didn't know it was being made until after!!
Oooooo. Now THATS a bit of an insult.
She was a major key star in the first one.
Kelly McGillis stopped acting a long time ago.."
Well maybe so but even if she had no interest in being a part of it maybe it would have been nice to at least tell her they were gonna make the movie. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tom Cruise: The Movie
Probably won't see it."
This.
Shame as I imagine the flight scenes will be awesome |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Got to be worth a watch, even if just for the flight scenes"
As a plane geek myself that's one of the main reasons that I will be watching it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I read that Cruise was keen to use as much real flying footage as possible. He got the flying bug and trained as a helicopter and fixed wing pilot, flying for real in some of his films, he's regarded as a pretty competent pilot.. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"And...AND! Why wait 33 fucking years to do it.
I'm just fucking on one now.
Someone out there is deliberately fucking with my calm with this.
I read that Kelly McGuiness didn't know it was being made until after!!
If you look at the pics of Kelly McGillis recently - it looks like time hasn’t done her any favours!
For me one of the all time favourite movie moments is when she walks down the middle of the class with an amazing view of her seamed stockings. I fell in love with it in 1986.... and still love it now!
Love Rachel xxx
Oooooo. Now THATS a bit of an insult.
She was a major key star in the first one.
Kelly McGillis stopped acting a long time ago.."
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This is binary: it's either going to win or fail.
Go ballistic or crash and burn.
I hope it's the former,I really do,but I have worries because I've been let down a long way - a long,long way - by the eventual return to one of the greatest cinematic franchises of all time: Indiana Jones (several of you thought I was going to say Star Wars, admit it. Oh believe me,that's up there,but I think the new ones have been really pretty good films.).
"... Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" is...well,to me,it does not exist as part of the canon.
I said,years ago,they needed to get on and make it; it needed to involve Atlantis because THAT would involve Nazis (easily his more natural enemy) since it was Hitler's early introduction to the Atlantean myths, particularly the notion that the fabricated 'Aryan' race,a subset of the Nordic peoples,could trace their 'ancestry' back to Aquaman's buddies,that formed a foundation of the Nazi's set of beliefs and self-justification. So much so that time and serious money was spent by the Nazis in search of the so-called Lost Continent.
Thanks a bunch,Himmler.
Indy would have known what to do.
But,instead,we got Shia la Douche, Russians and...oh,good crikey,what were they thinking?..freaking aliens.
And all the while there's still a really good story to be told about Mitchell-Hedges and HIS life.
The flight scenes will doubtless be awesome. I don't see how anyone could top Loggins' "Danger Zone" as a central theme song and I'd put money on it not being as hilariously homoerotic as the first one!
Anyone for volleyball?
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
It'll look good on 4K UHD at home; eventually.
Went to the pictures to see the first one. No real need to for this one. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Will never live up to the first one but will still go see it opening night. The flight scenes look unreal in the trailer, the theme song still gives me goosebumps.
It's my favorite movie ever as someone else said. Young Tom cruise the older handsome Tom skerritt, goofy goose, fast planes and fast bikes what's not to love
I feel the need...the need for speed |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Some things should be left alone. Plus all these action movies now being remade by all female cast is just wrong why not come up with original content and movies x |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Nooo way.. Has imagination just gone from film industry that all they can do is copy, revamp or add to old legendary films.. Bad enough they did a so called version of Italian job.. Personally I found trainspotting two to be a wee bit damp squib.. Just dont |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
There appears to be an F14 in it as well.... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Who will be his sidekick? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who will be his sidekick? "
Could be goose's son will Meg Ryan be in it too x |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Should have quit acting a while ago.. or taken on more realistic roles.. rather than having to be the action hero with cheesy lines all the time. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago
carrbrook stalybridge |
"Who will be his sidekick?
Could be goose's son will Meg Ryan be in it too x " judgeing from the trailer it might be gooses daughter ? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It’s a win win for the studio sadly. Even if it’s crap, people will flock to see it. Personally from what I’ve seen it’s too much of a pastiche of the original already. A volley ball scene ? Really? Only thing that makes sense from what I’ve spied (geek alert) is that after the trauma of losing goose, he’s now flying single seaters ...although the f14 was replaced with the hornet anyway...think they’ve left this one too long. Remember the last Indiana Jones film?? ...... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
As per what cookiekitten said F14s are no more and what happened to him becoming an instructor at Fighter weapons school? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As per what cookiekitten said F14s are no more and what happened to him becoming an instructor at Fighter weapons school?"
At least he didn’t end up “flying a cargo plane full of rubber dog shit outta Hong Kong” .....ahem...sorry .. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As per what cookiekitten said F14s are no more and what happened to him becoming an instructor at Fighter weapons school?
At least he didn’t end up “flying a cargo plane full of rubber dog shit outta Hong Kong” .....ahem...sorry .."
Haha don't start quoting lines next it will be Days of thunder. I hope not because now NASCAR is a pile of poo these days |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As per what cookiekitten said F14s are no more and what happened to him becoming an instructor at Fighter weapons school?"
I think he is now the boss of said school.. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
At least he gets the Kawasaki GPZ750R out again, I had the 900R .
I think it'll be ok, not a patch on the original but nowhere near as bad as Indiana Jones and the ahem Crystal Maze .. whatever. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Who will be his sidekick?
Could be goose's son will Meg Ryan be in it too x "
As I understand it, the plot focusses around Maverick teaching Goose’s son to fly and is still haunted by Goose’s death. He is now the Chief Instructor at Top Gun.
Apparently he is still a Captain ... but Iceman is also in it .... and is his boss - an Admiral!! ... interesting dynanic!
R zx |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
He was a lieutenant in Top Gun. A US Navy Captain is hardly a low rank, akin to an Army Colonel, and only one below Rear Admiral (no sniggering now).
When I was RN I expressed no interest in rank progression, only role progression and was met with the same derision. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Goose is now in "Designated Survivor" I didn't recognise him at first, |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *ogNMuseCouple
over a year ago
Surrey |
"Who will be his sidekick?
Could be goose's son will Meg Ryan be in it too x
As I understand it, the plot focusses around Maverick teaching Goose’s son to fly and is still haunted by Goose’s death. He is now the Chief Instructor at Top Gun.
Apparently he is still a Captain ... but Iceman is also in it .... and is his boss - an Admiral!! ... interesting dynanic!
R zx"
Only problem with it being gooses son - he would be 35+ which I would think is far too old to be starting flight school... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who will be his sidekick?
Could be goose's son will Meg Ryan be in it too x
As I understand it, the plot focusses around Maverick teaching Goose’s son to fly and is still haunted by Goose’s death. He is now the Chief Instructor at Top Gun.
Apparently he is still a Captain ... but Iceman is also in it .... and is his boss - an Admiral!! ... interesting dynanic!
R zx
Only problem with it being gooses son - he would be 35+ which I would think is far too old to be starting flight school..."
Top gun wasn’t a flight school. It’s a course you can be sent in at any time, so that could very well work. 35 isn’t that old for a USN pilot ... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Keep watching the trailer back and still I can't make up my mind...
Is this one step too far for Mr. cruise by making a sequel to his greatest ever movie, loved by millions, almost perfection??
Discuss people. "
The trailer looks great which is rare for a cruise movie.
The first movie was awful when I saw it as a youngster and hardly his greatest movie in my own opinion so this sequel seems justified and hopefully better than the first.
His greatest movies in my opinion are a few good men and far & away. After that all his other movies are too focused on him. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Keep watching the trailer back and still I can't make up my mind...
Is this one step too far for Mr. cruise by making a sequel to his greatest ever movie, loved by millions, almost perfection??
Discuss people.
The trailer looks great which is rare for a cruise movie.
The first movie was awful when I saw it as a youngster and hardly his greatest movie in my own opinion so this sequel seems justified and hopefully better than the first.
His greatest movies in my opinion are a few good men and far & away. After that all his other movies are too focused on him."
One of the advantages of being the star .... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Same as the film The Italian Job , some should just be left alone |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Same as the film The Italian Job , some should just be left alone "
Saying that...there is a natural successor (not sequel) to The Italian Job. Different story, but same calibre.
It's English, set in the 70s, has a black Mini outside a certain London Prison, involves an international gang. A famous posh actor as the head honcho, a brilliant sense of humour, that gettaway and a real feel good factor, that is sorely missing in the American hash up.
This little forgotten gem is called
"A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square"
It's worth hunting down.
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
The new Top Gun trailer has two words, that really set the tone.
Clue: It's about Iceman and his rank!
Fuck! That's gonna cause some headaches. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Looking forward to it finally coming out!! I'm not looking for better than top gun. I just hope it's good. Written by Christopher mcquarrie so I've high hopes! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
It's got some big flying boots to fill.
Let's hope the wait is worth it. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *UNKIEMan
over a year ago
south east |
36 long years i have waited for this movie ..i am convinced it will be every bit as good as the first ... cruise and bruckhiemer know how important this movie is and wont let us down |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"36 long years i have waited for this movie ..i am convinced it will be every bit as good as the first ... cruise and bruckhiemer know how important this movie is and wont let us down " its not long now. I was going to book to see it on the 19th (charity showings) |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Tickets booked for the 25th, in 4DX. Have been waiting sooooo long for this to come out! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *UNKIEMan
over a year ago
south east |
Epic movie .... everybit as good as id hoped it would be ..def be going back to cinema to see it again ...if you are an original Topgun fan you wont be disappointed |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Epic movie .... everybit as good as id hoped it would be ..def be going back to cinema to see it again ...if you are an original Topgun fan you wont be disappointed " I agree with this utterly. I'm off to see it for the 2nd time this evening x |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
So far it’s awesome I am a hour in stoped to look at fab but will pick it back up and finish watching in about 5 minutes |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I feel the need...but it will have to wait until next weekend.. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo"
How? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How?" dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *UNKIEMan
over a year ago
south east |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen. "
Agreed it was def made for cinema |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *itty9899Man
over a year ago
Craggy Island |
Tickets are booked for tomorrow. Been told it's fabulous. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen. "
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon " We will have to agree to disagree as things like this and the up coming jurassic world need the big screen. And besides it supports the film industry x |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon We will have to agree to disagree as things like this and the up coming jurassic world need the big screen. And besides it supports the film industry x"
It dose support them I am all for that x |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen. "
Hoping to see it next week but not sure i can wait that long. Might have to be one of those people who go on their own! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Hoping to see it next week but not sure i can wait that long. Might have to be one of those people who go on their own!" I'm sat in the cinema now watching it for the 2nd time alone xxx |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Hoping to see it next week but not sure i can wait that long. Might have to be one of those people who go on their own! I'm sat in the cinema now watching it for the 2nd time alone xxx"
Ive never been on my own! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Hoping to see it next week but not sure i can wait that long. Might have to be one of those people who go on their own! I'm sat in the cinema now watching it for the 2nd time alone xxx
Ive never been on my own! " I love it xx |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Just watched it! Omg loved it, bit rough in 4Dx mind |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon "
If you're watching a 16:9 silent movie then I might agree with you.
But what about the different format (21:9 maybe?), the compression used, the colour bit rate (are all the components in your system rated for 4k @60 Hz at 4:4:4 bit depth?). Actual pixel density is only one part of the chain, and I'd argue 1080p 4:4:4 is going to be better than 4k 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
And don't get me started on audio. Your home system is not going to match a cinema. It might be good, but does it meet Dolby Atmos standards? (7.2.4).
Go watch in the cinema. It's how it was made to be enjoyed. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Watching maverick on a tv at home is the saddest thing I’ve ever heard. It’s like eating an amazing steak on a paper plate sat in a shed instead of a beautiful restaurant. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon
If you're watching a 16:9 silent movie then I might agree with you.
But what about the different format (21:9 maybe?), the compression used, the colour bit rate (are all the components in your system rated for 4k @60 Hz at 4:4:4 bit depth?). Actual pixel density is only one part of the chain, and I'd argue 1080p 4:4:4 is going to be better than 4k 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
And don't get me started on audio. Your home system is not going to match a cinema. It might be good, but does it meet Dolby Atmos standards? (7.2.4).
Go watch in the cinema. It's how it was made to be enjoyed."
Ooo no my system is not rate for 4K 60hz
Try on the bleeding edge off teach 8k 60hz 12bit colour it’s a top off the line Samsung Q950 it’s rate as the best tv screen in the world right now
It is a no compromise tv with ever bit off tech available at the moment Crammed in to it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon
If you're watching a 16:9 silent movie then I might agree with you.
But what about the different format (21:9 maybe?), the compression used, the colour bit rate (are all the components in your system rated for 4k @60 Hz at 4:4:4 bit depth?). Actual pixel density is only one part of the chain, and I'd argue 1080p 4:4:4 is going to be better than 4k 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
And don't get me started on audio. Your home system is not going to match a cinema. It might be good, but does it meet Dolby Atmos standards? (7.2.4).
Go watch in the cinema. It's how it was made to be enjoyed.
Ooo no my system is not rate for 4K 60hz
Try on the bleeding edge off teach 8k 60hz 12bit colour it’s a top off the line Samsung Q950 it’s rate as the best tv screen in the world right now
It is a no compromise tv with ever bit off tech available at the moment Crammed in to it "
And yet you happily compromise on the quality of the movie with some dodgy TS. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
We’re going to see it with a couple of friends from here. Roll on Thursday. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon
If you're watching a 16:9 silent movie then I might agree with you.
But what about the different format (21:9 maybe?), the compression used, the colour bit rate (are all the components in your system rated for 4k @60 Hz at 4:4:4 bit depth?). Actual pixel density is only one part of the chain, and I'd argue 1080p 4:4:4 is going to be better than 4k 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
And don't get me started on audio. Your home system is not going to match a cinema. It might be good, but does it meet Dolby Atmos standards? (7.2.4).
Go watch in the cinema. It's how it was made to be enjoyed.
Ooo no my system is not rate for 4K 60hz
Try on the bleeding edge off teach 8k 60hz 12bit colour it’s a top off the line Samsung Q950 it’s rate as the best tv screen in the world right now
It is a no compromise tv with ever bit off tech available at the moment Crammed in to it
And yet you happily compromise on the quality of the movie with some dodgy TS. "
Nope as I watched the copy on my phone I will wait till a it hits a clean copy and then watch it on the tv with the tv on full upscale AI mode |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon
If you're watching a 16:9 silent movie then I might agree with you.
But what about the different format (21:9 maybe?), the compression used, the colour bit rate (are all the components in your system rated for 4k @60 Hz at 4:4:4 bit depth?). Actual pixel density is only one part of the chain, and I'd argue 1080p 4:4:4 is going to be better than 4k 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
And don't get me started on audio. Your home system is not going to match a cinema. It might be good, but does it meet Dolby Atmos standards? (7.2.4).
Go watch in the cinema. It's how it was made to be enjoyed.
Ooo no my system is not rate for 4K 60hz
Try on the bleeding edge off teach 8k 60hz 12bit colour it’s a top off the line Samsung Q950 it’s rate as the best tv screen in the world right now
It is a no compromise tv with ever bit off tech available at the moment Crammed in to it
And yet you happily compromise on the quality of the movie with some dodgy TS.
Nope as I watched the copy on my phone I will wait till a it hits a clean copy and then watch it on the tv with the tv on full upscale AI mode " I've got to say your missing out not seeing it on the big screen. There are not many films I feel should really be watched on the big screen but this is definitely one of them. Ans the sound too... can't replicate that at home.
I'll be off to see it again at some point in the next week. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon
If you're watching a 16:9 silent movie then I might agree with you.
But what about the different format (21:9 maybe?), the compression used, the colour bit rate (are all the components in your system rated for 4k @60 Hz at 4:4:4 bit depth?). Actual pixel density is only one part of the chain, and I'd argue 1080p 4:4:4 is going to be better than 4k 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
And don't get me started on audio. Your home system is not going to match a cinema. It might be good, but does it meet Dolby Atmos standards? (7.2.4).
Go watch in the cinema. It's how it was made to be enjoyed.
Ooo no my system is not rate for 4K 60hz
Try on the bleeding edge off teach 8k 60hz 12bit colour it’s a top off the line Samsung Q950 it’s rate as the best tv screen in the world right now
It is a no compromise tv with ever bit off tech available at the moment Crammed in to it
And yet you happily compromise on the quality of the movie with some dodgy TS.
Nope as I watched the copy on my phone I will wait till a it hits a clean copy and then watch it on the tv with the tv on full upscale AI mode I've got to say your missing out not seeing it on the big screen. There are not many films I feel should really be watched on the big screen but this is definitely one of them. Ans the sound too... can't replicate that at home.
I'll be off to see it again at some point in the next week. "
Each to there own on that respective but even to this day I am blow away with just how good the tv is
As for 99% off it’s life it’s switch in game mode
But that one’s in a while when I switch it to full movie mode nothing comes even remotely close
I have done my compatriots with movies I have seen at the cinema and then watch them again on the tv
And the tv completely blows the cinema screen out the water
The one down side to it is it has ruined everything for me in terms off watching things
As once you lived with it for so long everything else just falls so short by a mile
It’s like own a Ferrari then down gradeing to a 1.1 eco boost Ford lol
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon
If you're watching a 16:9 silent movie then I might agree with you.
But what about the different format (21:9 maybe?), the compression used, the colour bit rate (are all the components in your system rated for 4k @60 Hz at 4:4:4 bit depth?). Actual pixel density is only one part of the chain, and I'd argue 1080p 4:4:4 is going to be better than 4k 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
And don't get me started on audio. Your home system is not going to match a cinema. It might be good, but does it meet Dolby Atmos standards? (7.2.4).
Go watch in the cinema. It's how it was made to be enjoyed.
Ooo no my system is not rate for 4K 60hz
Try on the bleeding edge off teach 8k 60hz 12bit colour it’s a top off the line Samsung Q950 it’s rate as the best tv screen in the world right now
It is a no compromise tv with ever bit off tech available at the moment Crammed in to it
And yet you happily compromise on the quality of the movie with some dodgy TS.
Nope as I watched the copy on my phone I will wait till a it hits a clean copy and then watch it on the tv with the tv on full upscale AI mode I've got to say your missing out not seeing it on the big screen. There are not many films I feel should really be watched on the big screen but this is definitely one of them. Ans the sound too... can't replicate that at home.
I'll be off to see it again at some point in the next week.
Each to there own on that respective but even to this day I am blow away with just how good the tv is
As for 99% off it’s life it’s switch in game mode
But that one’s in a while when I switch it to full movie mode nothing comes even remotely close
I have done my compatriots with movies I have seen at the cinema and then watch them again on the tv
And the tv completely blows the cinema screen out the water
The one down side to it is it has ruined everything for me in terms off watching things
As once you lived with it for so long everything else just falls so short by a mile
It’s like own a Ferrari then down gradeing to a 1.1 eco boost Ford lol
"
So was the remake any good then? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *UNKIEMan
over a year ago
south east |
its NOT a remake !!! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
There's so much hype behind this film... I think I'm going to avoid it for a few months/year when people start talking trash about it and TopGun 3 is in the planning.. then maybe... I might watch it. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Hoping to see it next week but not sure i can wait that long. Might have to be one of those people who go on their own! I'm sat in the cinema now watching it for the 2nd time alone xxx
Ive never been on my own! "
You can be my wingman anytime.. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Watching tonight on my new tele woo hoo
How? dodgy way I am guessing. And no matter how big someone's TV is you really need to see this on the big screen.
Probably the worst way to watch it is at the cinema
Most uk cinema screens are only 2k res witch means the quality isn’t good at all
Hence why they have you sit at a distance as once your out off the feild off pixel density anything from 1080p and up will look the same
To be honest you get better quality sitting watching it at home on a home tv screen as most people these days have a 4K tv
But granted the quality off the copy that’s out just now is not as good as the cinema but ones the quality there then would be better at home
I will injoy watching it at 4K upscaled to 8K very soon
If you're watching a 16:9 silent movie then I might agree with you.
But what about the different format (21:9 maybe?), the compression used, the colour bit rate (are all the components in your system rated for 4k @60 Hz at 4:4:4 bit depth?). Actual pixel density is only one part of the chain, and I'd argue 1080p 4:4:4 is going to be better than 4k 4:2:2 or 4:2:0.
And don't get me started on audio. Your home system is not going to match a cinema. It might be good, but does it meet Dolby Atmos standards? (7.2.4).
Go watch in the cinema. It's how it was made to be enjoyed.
Ooo no my system is not rate for 4K 60hz
Try on the bleeding edge off teach 8k 60hz 12bit colour it’s a top off the line Samsung Q950 it’s rate as the best tv screen in the world right now
It is a no compromise tv with ever bit off tech available at the moment Crammed in to it
And yet you happily compromise on the quality of the movie with some dodgy TS.
Nope as I watched the copy on my phone I will wait till a it hits a clean copy and then watch it on the tv with the tv on full upscale AI mode I've got to say your missing out not seeing it on the big screen. There are not many films I feel should really be watched on the big screen but this is definitely one of them. Ans the sound too... can't replicate that at home.
I'll be off to see it again at some point in the next week.
Each to there own on that respective but even to this day I am blow away with just how good the tv is
As for 99% off it’s life it’s switch in game mode
But that one’s in a while when I switch it to full movie mode nothing comes even remotely close
I have done my compatriots with movies I have seen at the cinema and then watch them again on the tv
And the tv completely blows the cinema screen out the water
The one down side to it is it has ruined everything for me in terms off watching things
As once you lived with it for so long everything else just falls so short by a mile
It’s like own a Ferrari then down gradeing to a 1.1 eco boost Ford lol
So was the remake any good then? "
It’s a sequel and yes was worth watching |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Not a fan boy, was dragged along by the other half. So I can give you an honest review. 1st half was very slow and super cheesy, and I was rather disappointed. However 2nd half was a different movie. The action scenes were great and I really enjoyed it. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
We saw the original at home again, on Friday then went to the cinema and saw it properly.
She didn't know it but our allocated seats were F15 for her and F14 for me. (Good call!) I clocked the Eagle and Tomcat references in a heartbeat.
The audience made all the right noises at all the right times.
There were a few references to other massive films.
The first film was a rock and roll pubescent adventure, the sequel is a much more retrospective, which only makes sense if you have seen the original.
What I can say is this; without giving too much away, the whole production crew knew what was expected from them and...
go on, go and see it for yourself! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
Two blasts from Mav's past, are there in the film, one object seen in the original and one only referred to briefly, but never seen. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
"We saw the original at home again, on Friday then went to the cinema and saw it properly.
She didn't know it but our allocated seats were F15 for her and F14 for me. (Good call!) I clocked the Eagle and Tomcat references in a heartbeat.
The audience made all the right noises at all the right times.
There were a few references to other massive films.
The first film was a rock and roll pubescent adventure, the sequel is a much more retrospective, which only makes sense if you have seen the original.
What I can say is this; without giving too much away, the whole production crew knew what was expected from them and...
go on, go and see it for yourself! "
I've watched the original today and seeing the new one on Wednesday |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"We saw the original at home again, on Friday then went to the cinema and saw it properly.
She didn't know it but our allocated seats were F15 for her and F14 for me. (Good call!) I clocked the Eagle and Tomcat references in a heartbeat.
The audience made all the right noises at all the right times.
There were a few references to other massive films.
The first film was a rock and roll pubescent adventure, the sequel is a much more retrospective, which only makes sense if you have seen the original.
What I can say is this; without giving too much away, the whole production crew knew what was expected from them and...
go on, go and see it for yourself! " I had f14 for my seat when I watched it the 2nd time.
Did anyone notice the subtle nod to Jennifer's other big 80s movie???? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"We saw the original at home again, on Friday then went to the cinema and saw it properly.
She didn't know it but our allocated seats were F15 for her and F14 for me. (Good call!) I clocked the Eagle and Tomcat references in a heartbeat.
The audience made all the right noises at all the right times.
There were a few references to other massive films.
The first film was a rock and roll pubescent adventure, the sequel is a much more retrospective, which only makes sense if you have seen the original.
What I can say is this; without giving too much away, the whole production crew knew what was expected from them and...
go on, go and see it for yourself! I had f14 for my seat when I watched it the 2nd time.
Did anyone notice the subtle nod to Jennifer's other big 80s movie????"
No, not me. I could only think of Coyote Ugly but that's way too new. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
F14, is the only seat to sit in! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Two blasts from Mav's past, are there in the film, one object seen in the original and one only referred to briefly, but never seen."
And now we know why he got grief over her in the first….penny would have been 15 when he made his low pass over her! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Watching maverick on a tv at home is the saddest thing I’ve ever heard. It’s like eating an amazing steak on a paper plate sat in a shed instead of a beautiful restaurant. "
This is why we came out of lockdown...alive. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Two blasts from Mav's past, are there in the film, one object seen in the original and one only referred to briefly, but never seen.
And now we know why he got grief over her in the first….penny would have been 15 when he made his low pass over her!"
Crashed and burned, the first time around. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *itty9899Man
over a year ago
Craggy Island |
"We saw the original at home again, on Friday then went to the cinema and saw it properly.
She didn't know it but our allocated seats were F15 for her and F14 for me. (Good call!) I clocked the Eagle and Tomcat references in a heartbeat.
The audience made all the right noises at all the right times.
There were a few references to other massive films.
The first film was a rock and roll pubescent adventure, the sequel is a much more retrospective, which only makes sense if you have seen the original.
What I can say is this; without giving too much away, the whole production crew knew what was expected from them and...
go on, go and see it for yourself! I had f14 for my seat when I watched it the 2nd time.
Did anyone notice the subtle nod to Jennifer's other big 80s movie????"
Yes, they played the song from Labyrinth.
She is gorgeous. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
IF Top Gun was a British film, is a 2 part short film that converts the original into something straight out of The Office.
David Brent, running an aircraft carrier?
Don't have nightmares kids!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5HX1EDdR_M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQaC3zSu_fU |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"We saw the original at home again, on Friday then went to the cinema and saw it properly.
She didn't know it but our allocated seats were F15 for her and F14 for me. (Good call!) I clocked the Eagle and Tomcat references in a heartbeat.
The audience made all the right noises at all the right times.
There were a few references to other massive films.
The first film was a rock and roll pubescent adventure, the sequel is a much more retrospective, which only makes sense if you have seen the original.
What I can say is this; without giving too much away, the whole production crew knew what was expected from them and...
go on, go and see it for yourself! I had f14 for my seat when I watched it the 2nd time.
Did anyone notice the subtle nod to Jennifer's other big 80s movie????
Yes, they played the song from Labyrinth.
She is gorgeous. " they didn't play the song from labyrinth but did play a song By David Bowie.x |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Watched this new Top Gun today. Was superb |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Fucking awesome
As soon as the music started hairs on the back of my neck were up and never went down. Grinned like a big kid all the way through. Best film I've seen for a long time, a lot of that is probably down to nostalgia but who cares. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Just home from seeing it. Defo worth a watch it is as good as the original |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Fucking awesome
As soon as the music started hairs on the back of my neck were up and never went down. Grinned like a big kid all the way through. Best film I've seen for a long time, a lot of that is probably down to nostalgia but who cares."
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Fucking awesome
As soon as the music started hairs on the back of my neck were up and never went down. Grinned like a big kid all the way through. Best film I've seen for a long time, a lot of that is probably down to nostalgia but who cares."
I experienced exactly the same thing. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Fucking awesome
As soon as the music started hairs on the back of my neck were up and never went down. Grinned like a big kid all the way through. Best film I've seen for a long time, a lot of that is probably down to nostalgia but who cares."
Yep, exactly this..
As well as when he whipped the tarp off his old Kawasaki and jumped back on it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Fucking awesome
As soon as the music started hairs on the back of my neck were up and never went down. Grinned like a big kid all the way through. Best film I've seen for a long time, a lot of that is probably down to nostalgia but who cares."
I was the same when I watched it today! Couldn’t help but love it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I've seen it. It was a hit for me. Cheesy in parts, but overall feel good film with epic soundtrack |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Awesome. Expands character's and storyline from the first film, which honours but doesn't cheapen the first
film, while delivering a thrill paced, and much needed shot of cinimatic escapism that wasn't needed but sure glad we got it. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
In my cinema seat was a drinks holder., which just so happened to be a tad bigger than the bottle of tonic water, which spent the whole of the film pretending to be a side mounted joystick |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Just back from the cinema. Loved every second of it. It was a blast to say the least and it definitely exceed our expectations!! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
There wasn't as many memorable quotes, this time around. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Is it not just the same story revamped? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Is it not just the same story revamped? "
Same skeleton, different flesh? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's was awesome hubby and I went to see it at the drive in. I enjoy it alot. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Just got back from watching it.
And I loved the first one as a kid growing up and watched the original only the other night on sky.
When I watched it back I found it pretty cheesy but ok.
The modern top gun is actually great and I dare say it is almost better than the original. Great acting, great action a must watch. The only thing not quite on par, the originals soundtrack was damn well hard to beat and although there are a few of the original tunes in number two, it’s not quite the same. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just got back from watching it.
And I loved the first one as a kid growing up and watched the original only the other night on sky.
When I watched it back I found it pretty cheesy but ok.
The modern top gun is actually great and I dare say it is almost better than the original. Great acting, great action a must watch. The only thing not quite on par, the originals soundtrack was damn well hard to beat and although there are a few of the original tunes in number two, it’s not quite the same."
I agree much better than the original |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *urora1912Woman
over a year ago
Norfolk East anglia |
Watched it tonight so glad I've finally seen it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Thoroughly enjoyed it today. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Went to see it last night both of us loved it Ariel action scenes are stunning, definitely recommend |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
We went to see it last night and both of us really enjoyed it.
NBVN x |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Two blasts from Mav's past, are there in the film, one object seen in the original and one only referred to briefly, but never seen.
And now we know why he got grief over her in the first….penny would have been 15 when he made his low pass over her!"
I was 15 in the summer of 86. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Hubby’s review was:
One of the best sequels he has ever seen. Been to watch it twice and going again.
If you love the original for what it is… an over cheesy, heavily American, high octane, homo-erotic blast with a killer nostalgic soundtrack… then you will love it. As a neutral, the plane sequences and general humour and sentiment are good too.
I haven’t seen it - not a top gun fan |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I thought it was quite boring and predictable to be honest |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
It's entertainment nothing more, waiting until it hits the rental/streaming services to watch it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"I thought it was quite boring and predictable to be honest "
I thought the first was pretty shit too tbh.
Can't help thinking there is just a lot of nostalgia about it and if it came out as an original film now, it would flop. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I thought it was quite boring and predictable to be honest
I thought the first was pretty shit too tbh.
Can't help thinking there is just a lot of nostalgia about it and if it came out as an original film now, it would flop. "
Agree |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I've never watched the first one. They arnt my kinda films. But I watched the 2nd with a few of my mates. And I felt thay it was quite slow and draggy. I also felt that it was abit predictable etc. How ever the ending scene in the jets was pretty good |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *UNKIEMan
over a year ago
south east |
"Two blasts from Mav's past, are there in the film, one object seen in the original and one only referred to briefly, but never seen.
And now we know why he got grief over her in the first….penny would have been 15 when he made his low pass over her!
I was 15 in the summer of 86."
Me to and left the cinema many times that summer wanting to be a navy pilot lol |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Hubby’s review was:
One of the best sequels he has ever seen. Been to watch it twice and going again.
If you love the original for what it is… an over cheesy, heavily American, high octane, homo-erotic blast with a killer nostalgic soundtrack… then you will love it. As a neutral, the plane sequences and general humour and sentiment are good too.
I haven’t seen it - not a top gun fan "
I’ve been to see it & I loved it , Maverick goes out with Penny Benjamin in the film , who is mentioned in the first film “ you did high speed passes over 5 air control towers & 1 admirals daughter “ |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Two blasts from Mav's past, are there in the film, one object seen in the original and one only referred to briefly, but never seen.
And now we know why he got grief over her in the first….penny would have been 15 when he made his low pass over her!
I was 15 in the summer of 86.
Me to and left the cinema many times that summer wanting to be a navy pilot lol "
I've done aerobatics on my first ever flight as a passenger, in a flying brick.
Doing an outside loop is amazing, scary and truly a bucket list item.
Was I sick? No. The withdrawal symptoms never were off.
Flying is a major addiction. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm going to see it this weekend, can't wait, loved the first film |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
From a pilot's perspective it was great, even the tongue in cheek parts. Plot?, who cares..? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Fantastic film I’m glad I saw it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
The chase scene on the ground featured my favourite 'chariot'. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Keep watching the trailer back and still I can't make up my mind...
Is this one step too far for Mr. cruise by making a sequel to his greatest ever movie, loved by millions, almost perfection??
Discuss people. "
How would you write it? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Over a year ago when I first (and only) commented on this thread. So finally got to see the film this afternoon.
Flight sequences brilliant, spectacular and well worth watching on the big screen.
Characters, ok even some quite emotional scenes thrown in for good measure. But mainly forgettable actors playing pilots.
Plot, without giving any spoilers, something happens and rather than go with a surprising ending, they did something predictable and far fetched in the end.
So for me half a decent film I’ll happily watch again on Sky Movies in 6 months time. But still think it’s not a patch on the original film.
(Glad we got to see the GPZ900R again) |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
I did see it last week and I loved it! As soon as the music started me and my friend looked at each other and said 'Yessssss, love it already'. The best sequel ever made |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I did see it last week and I loved it! As soon as the music started me and my friend looked at each other and said 'Yessssss, love it already'. The best sequel ever made "
Terminator 2 (cough cough) |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Just been to see it.
The areal scenes are great and the F-14/SU-57 combat CGI is very believable.
The acting is crap and it's dripping with cheese and testosterone. I'm surprised they weren't grabbing eachother by the penis while chanting "USA USA".
It's good but I was a little disappointed to be honest. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *andonmessMan
over a year ago
A world all of his own |
Went to see it with a friend last night and yep, goose bumps (pardon the pun) from that first metallic bong/gong of the theme tune. Absolutely fantastic cinematography and props to the actors for the training that they all did to have real in cockpit filming.
Absolutely loved it, all of it, nostalgia overload |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Keep watching the trailer back and still I can't make up my mind...
Is this one step too far for Mr. cruise by making a sequel to his greatest ever movie, loved by millions, almost perfection??
Discuss people. "
No, it’s great. Watched it last weekend. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *itty9899Man
over a year ago
Craggy Island |
"Just been to see it.
The areal scenes are great and the F-14/SU-57 combat CGI is very believable.
The acting is crap and it's dripping with cheese and testosterone. I'm surprised they weren't grabbing eachother by the penis while chanting "USA USA".
It's good but I was a little disappointed to be honest."
There was no CGI. it was one of Tom Cruise request into making the sequel. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
It's an awesome film.
The jets are real and only do things they are actually capable of in real life. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's an awesome film.
The jets are real and only do things they are actually capable of in real life."
Not strictly true.
The Darkstar is totally fictional.
America doesn't have any F-14's, not even scrap ones. They destroyed them because they were worried parts would be stripped off and sold to Iran which is the only other country in the world that has them.
The 5th Gen SU-57 can do all the stuff you see in the film but there's currently only 3 operational and they're Russian.
Boring I know but I'm a nerd for this stuff. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"It's an awesome film.
The jets are real and only do things they are actually capable of in real life.
Not strictly true.
The Darkstar is totally fictional.
America doesn't have any F-14's, not even scrap ones. They destroyed them because they were worried parts would be stripped off and sold to Iran which is the only other country in the world that has them.
The 5th Gen SU-57 can do all the stuff you see in the film but there's currently only 3 operational and they're Russian.
Boring I know but I'm a nerd for this stuff."
I'd forgotten about the Darkstar.
Though whether or not there are still Tomcats about, what they do in both films is not beyond reality. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just been to see it.
The areal scenes are great and the F-14/SU-57 combat CGI is very believable.
The acting is crap and it's dripping with cheese and testosterone. I'm surprised they weren't grabbing eachother by the penis while chanting "USA USA".
It's good but I was a little disappointed to be honest.
There was no CGI. it was one of Tom Cruise request into making the sequel. "
There was lots of CGI, America has no F-14's and there's only 3 operational SU-57's which are Russian. That whole end fight is CGI. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's an awesome film.
The jets are real and only do things they are actually capable of in real life.
Not strictly true.
The Darkstar is totally fictional.
America doesn't have any F-14's, not even scrap ones. They destroyed them because they were worried parts would be stripped off and sold to Iran which is the only other country in the world that has them.
The 5th Gen SU-57 can do all the stuff you see in the film but there's currently only 3 operational and they're Russian.
Boring I know but I'm a nerd for this stuff.
I'd forgotten about the Darkstar.
Though whether or not there are still Tomcats about, what they do in both films is not beyond reality."
Splitting the throttle like he does at one point wasn't possible in the F-14 and even if it was the F-14A in the film would have instantly departed and gone into a flat spin, which they were notorious for. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Splitting the throttle like he does at one point wasn't possible in the F-14 and even if it was the F-14A in the film would have instantly departed and gone into a flat spin, which they were notorious for."
I'll check up on that tomorrow |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Splitting the throttle like he does at one point wasn't possible in the F-14 and even if it was the F-14A in the film would have instantly departed and gone into a flat spin, which they were notorious for.
I'll check up on that tomorrow "
There's a former F-14 RIO called Wars Carol on YouTube and he did a video on everything wrong with Top Gun. It's quite an extensive list. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Splitting the throttle like he does at one point wasn't possible in the F-14 and even if it was the F-14A in the film would have instantly departed and gone into a flat spin, which they were notorious for.
I'll check up on that tomorrow
There's a former F-14 RIO called Wars Carol on YouTube and he did a video on everything wrong with Top Gun. It's quite an extensive list."
That should have said "Ward Carol". |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"I'll check up on that tomorrow
There's a former F-14 RIO called Wars Carol on YouTube and he did a video on everything wrong with Top Gun. It's quite an extensive list."
I'm sure it is. I'll get my info from one of its designers |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I watched it last week and loved it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Watched it today, fantastic film, loved it don't care if it's true to life or not |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
Where did they get the HIND from? I want that one! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Where did they get the HIND from? I want that one!"
A cool $4m and you can get a surplus one! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Although Maverick made Ace in this movie, I couldn't help noticing that his 3 kills are denoted on his canopy by silhouettes that look like F18's, ie friendlies. Shouldn't they be F5's aka 'Mig 28' from the first movie? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
"Where did they get the HIND from? I want that one!
A cool $4m and you can get a surplus one!"
Stay there (just dives to the back of the couch and rolls up sleeve, like James Herriot fumbling around for a cash cow, no I meant calf) I need to check for the loose change. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Been tonight to see this, mega film, good old Hollywood American bullshit with a heroic uncle Sam finale, just as it should be. Seat gripping flying sequences & highly recommended |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
And Jen Connolly is still stunning, what a babe, better with age! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *orny PTMan
over a year ago
Peterborough |
Did I imagine this...or did the paramount ident on the VHS version of Top Gun feature an F14 flying around the mountain,? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
It's a bloody good film if that helps you decide. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago
carrbrook stalybridge |
"Did I imagine this...or did the paramount ident on the VHS version of Top Gun feature an F14 flying around the mountain,?" yep
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Overhyped American rubbish as expected |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Overhyped American rubbish as expected " did you think so.. I'm going to see it for the 12th time I think it is. X
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I have seen it and think it’s a very good watch |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Second film just felt like Tom Cruise was indulging himself. But I suppose for a reboot it was relatively good. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Saw it last night, the last 20 minutes is jump the shark material but I was still fist pumping at the end.
Pumping Jennifer connelly would also have been amazing too |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I thought it was ok.
Mr thought it was uttee shite and a rip off of Star Wars. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *onnyadtMan
over a year ago
Uttoxeter |
It's a great big dollop of nostalgic cheesefest, great fun and a good movie. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Enjoyed it, very cheesy with some excellent action scenes. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |