FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Photo verified

Photo verified

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

How broken is this feature, just seen someone photo verified with a picture of Rachel Bilson (US actress).

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Ha ha really ??

I’m actually Angelina Jolie

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I thought the verification photos are not on show ..

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *att71Man  over a year ago

Bristol

So we could in fact add anything then?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I believe it has cut down a lot of fakes but some do slip through the net.

It should be a compulsory process for every member

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ha ha really ??

I’m actually Angelina Jolie "

You look like a collecter of bones.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I believe it has cut down a lot of fakes but some do slip through the net.

It should be a compulsory process for every member "

My member is very verified.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The photo you use to photo verify are never shown, so how do you know OP .

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You can upload the photo verified photo again

I’ve seen a few

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Trouble is you only need a body shot. Not a face. Its to easy for fakers

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can upload the photo verified photo again

I’ve seen a few "

Yeah, but they would always go of the first one sent ..so sombody is going to the trouble of photoshoping their user name in to a well known persons photo..they must just be doing that for a laugh

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *eeBee67Man  over a year ago

Masked and Distant


"Ha ha really ??

I’m actually Angelina Jolie "

How dare you, I'm Angelina

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Trouble is you only need a body shot. Not a face. Its to easy for fakers"

I thought it clearly states a photo with faces in is needed

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ha ha really ??

I’m actually Angelina Jolie

How dare you, I'm Angelina "

No

I’m Angelina

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Trouble is you only need a body shot. Not a face. Its to easy for fakers

I thought it clearly states a photo with faces in is needed "

No. Either photo with face or a full length naked body.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Trouble is you only need a body shot. Not a face. Its to easy for fakers

I thought it clearly states a photo with faces in is needed

No. Either photo with face or a full length naked body."

Well that is pretty pointless them..

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *SAchickWoman  over a year ago

Hillside desolate


"Trouble is you only need a body shot. Not a face. Its to easy for fakers

I thought it clearly states a photo with faces in is needed "

No, either face or full naked body without face, I'm photo verified without my face on show.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Trouble is you only need a body shot. Not a face. Its to easy for fakers

I thought it clearly states a photo with faces in is needed

No, either face or full naked body without face, I'm photo verified without my face on show. "

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The photo you use to photo verify are never shown, so how do you know OP . "

He may mean the profile is photo verified (green flag) and the celeb pic is in their public gallery.

They may have photo verified with one pic and use fake pics for public. I doubt Admin have time to cross check each pic.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Trouble is you only need a body shot. Not a face. Its to easy for fakers

I thought it clearly states a photo with faces in is needed "

No. It can be a undresses body shot. To prove you are a man or women. Thats all.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Well we have learnt something today then...photo verification is meaningless..

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The photo you use to photo verify are never shown, so how do you know OP .

He may mean the profile is photo verified (green flag) and the celeb pic is in their public gallery.

They may have photo verified with one pic and use fake pics for public. I doubt Admin have time to cross check each pic.

"

That was my understanding of it too..and was trying to point this out..

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *SAchickWoman  over a year ago

Hillside desolate


"Well we have learnt something today then...photo verification is meaningless.."

Pretty much. All it proves is that you are the sex you say you are, not that you match your public pics

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The photo you use to photo verify are never shown, so how do you know OP .

He may mean the profile is photo verified (green flag) and the celeb pic is in their public gallery.

They may have photo verified with one pic and use fake pics for public. I doubt Admin have time to cross check each pic.

That was my understanding of it too..and was trying to point this out.. "

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Well we have learnt something today then...photo verification is meaningless..

Pretty much. All it proves is that you are the sex you say you are, not that you match your public pics "

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *eeBee67Man  over a year ago

Masked and Distant

I must be too honest. I used a face pic

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

We are on a swingers site and not shy in anyway. It should be a full nude body shot holding page at waist height. Mine was

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Only really way is from recent verifications from other members I guess. And if they are saying they are who they say they are then it's all good.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We are on a swingers site and not shy in anyway. It should be a full nude body shot holding page at waist height. Mine was"

That's just reducing people to a piece of meat.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We are on a swingers site and not shy in anyway. It should be a full nude body shot holding page at waist height. Mine was

That's just reducing people to a piece of meat. "

Agreed

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *rightonsteveMan  over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!


"I believe it has cut down a lot of fakes but some do slip through the net.

It should be a compulsory process for every member "

Why?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *rightonsteveMan  over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!


"Well we have learnt something today then...photo verification is meaningless.."
yes, it is. I’m not photo verified after 5 years and it’s had zero impact.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I thought the verification photos are not on show .."

They're not...

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We are on a swingers site and not shy in anyway. It should be a full nude body shot holding page at waist height. Mine was

That's just reducing people to a piece of meat.

Agreed "

Is it thow. Its only fab that will see it. So many fake profiles and we all complain of this. Its a tighter way of stopping this

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *he Queen of TartsWoman  over a year ago
Forum Mod

My Own Little World


"I thought the verification photos are not on show .."

They don't. But the OP said the profile had a PV not the the PV pic wasn't them.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *he Queen of TartsWoman  over a year ago
Forum Mod

My Own Little World

Mods can sometimes make mistakes and allow a pic to slip through. Please report any photos that break the site rules, ie not of the profile holder

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We are on a swingers site and not shy in anyway. It should be a full nude body shot holding page at waist height. Mine was

That's just reducing people to a piece of meat.

Agreed

Is it thow. Its only fab that will see it. So many fake profiles and we all complain of this. Its a tighter way of stopping this"

I don't care who sees it, I wouldn't take a pic like that. I don't complain about it. I don't use verifications as proof of anything.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm batman

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ha ha really ??

I’m actually Angelina Jolie "

Can I raid your womb

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

  

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

Report please

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

0.0156

0