FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Moon landing...
Moon landing...
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
So are you suggesting because as yet none of the 400000 individuals involved in the entire mission have shouted bazzinga the Russians are in on the gag too  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Come on.... they never went did they?
And don't get me started on 9/11"
Just been watching videos on YT about the supposed glass structures on the moon!
Not sure if they did or didn't go now!
As for 9/11 something is definitely off about the whole thing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Come on.... they never went did they?
And don't get me started on 9/11
Just been watching videos on YT about the supposed glass structures on the moon!
Not sure if they did or didn't go now!
As for 9/11 something is definitely off about the whole thing. "
the only thing off about it was that they used cheap steel to build them and coved it up |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *odareyouMan
over a year ago
not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds) |
You do know they shine a laser beam at a reflector that was placed on the moon to measylure the distance ... it's how they know it's moving away from earth at a rate of 3.8 cm... Or in measurements useful on fab about the extra length most guys add to their cock measurements  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I guess the mirrors up there and left over bits of rocket quite visible through a telescope were planted by some Government agency then?
Oh...wait..."
Nobody said that nothing has ever landed on the moon  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams "
any 'fuel' be that aviation or something else that is alight will if it reaches about 650 degrees causes steel beams to lose their structural integrity through distortion and expansion.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You do know they shine a laser beam at a reflector that was placed on the moon to measylure the distance ... it's how they know it's moving away from earth at a rate of 3.8 cm... Or in measurements useful on fab about the extra length most guys add to their cock measurements "
Any idea why its moving away from earth ? Is there a stronger gravitational pull pulling it away ? Or is earth loosing its gravitational pull ?
The moon has the gravitation pull to move tides but why does the oceans not end up in outer space ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
any 'fuel' be that aviation or something else that is alight will if it reaches about 650 degrees causes steel beams to lose their structural integrity through distortion and expansion.. "
Stop trying to explain science to the flat earth society. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
I did not need to melt it just get it cherry red and any strength in the bean soon goes "
Structural steel as used in the trade towers has to be fore protected so even jet fuel burning wouldn't get it hot enough for it to collapse and who has ever seen a building that big collapse into its own foot print unless in a controlled demolition... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You do know they shine a laser beam at a reflector that was placed on the moon to measylure the distance ... it's how they know it's moving away from earth at a rate of 3.8 cm... Or in measurements useful on fab about the extra length most guys add to their cock measurements "
...the Chinese and Russians have these reflecters on the moon as well. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think they landed when they say they did, it was to stick two fingers up at the Russians to say they got there first."
And that is why you can be certain that they did.
Had they tried to fake it, the Russians would have been all over it like a bad rash.
Some people should just stop watching Capricorn One. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
I did not need to melt it just get it cherry red and any strength in the bean soon goes
Structural steel as used in the trade towers has to be fore protected so even jet fuel burning wouldn't get it hot enough for it to collapse and who has ever seen a building that big collapse into its own foot print unless in a controlled demolition..."
The walls act as a wind tunnel or furness as you would thus increasing those temperatures to extreme extreme temperatures
Petrol and those conditions has the ability to distort cast iron
Are you getting the picture ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago
Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum |
"I guess the mirrors up there and left over bits of rocket quite visible through a telescope were planted by some Government agency then?
Oh...wait...
Nobody said that nothing has ever landed on the moon "
Actually, over the years, quite a few people have said just that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It is strange that no one has been back for so many years.
Agreed
Why is it strange? Seems bloody obvious to me! "
And me. Maybe too far and too bloody expensive for a geology field trip might have something to do with it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"So are you suggesting because as yet none of the 400000 individuals involved in the entire mission have shouted bazzinga the Russians are in on the gag too "
Really...??
There only had to be around 15 people involved tops |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So are you suggesting because as yet none of the 400000 individuals involved in the entire mission have shouted bazzinga the Russians are in on the gag too
Really...??
There only had to be around 15 people involved tops"
I'll not waste my internet ink saying anything more than twaddle ....
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Tim commerford from the band Rage against the machine (who's father worked for NASA) recently remembered when he met Buzz Aldrin.
“I got into it with Buzz Aldrin five years ago at a John Cusack movie premiere. There were a bunch of people gathered around, and I said he said to him:
“I have a question: You have all these missions to the moon. How come there’s no pictures of the flags on the moon?” He said, “Well, those are highly degraded by radiation by now.” I said, “You left a lot of stuff on the moon. It seems that somebody with a telescope or satellite would snap a picture of that so we could see it. It’d be on the cover of every newspaper.”
“You could tell he was getting frustrated, and I asked him why he put a metal rod on top of the flag instead of just letting the flag out and do its thing. He gets all frustrated and says, “I’m just trying to remember what they told me to say.”
Buzz was also asked to swear on a Bible that he'd beento the moon and if he did the guy would donate thousands to a charity of his choice...he punched the guy!!!
Is the really the behaviour of someone who achieved one if the most amazing feats in history?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Yes it can.
Given enough oxygen the charcoal from your BBQ could do it as well."
It melt steel however the amount that was in that plane (considering what would have burnt off in impact) would have been amazing to melt enough steel of a building that was surrounded by steel columns in a way that it collapsed free fall...TWICE!
Oh and there was enough 'jet fuel' to bring down world trade centre 7 too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"As for the moon yes was a fix with the development of telescopes niw day you would be able to see where they land and foot prints as they is no wind to cover it up"
Would you?, a footprint...on the moon...with a telescope...bet you don't get those in John Lewis. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Yes it can.
Given enough oxygen the charcoal from your BBQ could do it as well."
....the steel bowed outwards... Leaving the concrete floors to fall on to each other. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Another bored provocateur with too much time on their hands...."
Another blinkered taxpayer that feels the need to insult those with an 'alternative' opinion to what they are told. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Yes it can.
Given enough oxygen the charcoal from your BBQ could do it as well.....the steel bowed outwards... Leaving the concrete floors to fall on to each other."
these were the first and only steel skyscrapers to have ever collapsed through fire..the report was so corrupt... engineers around the world are challenging it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tim commerford from the band Rage against the machine (who's father worked for NASA) recently remembered when he met Buzz Aldrin.
“I got into it with Buzz Aldrin five years ago at a John Cusack movie premiere. There were a bunch of people gathered around, and I said he said to him:
“I have a question: You have all these missions to the moon. How come there’s no pictures of the flags on the moon?” He said, “Well, those are highly degraded by radiation by now.” I said, “You left a lot of stuff on the moon. It seems that somebody with a telescope or satellite would snap a picture of that so we could see it. It’d be on the cover of every newspaper.”
“You could tell he was getting frustrated, and I asked him why he put a metal rod on top of the flag instead of just letting the flag out and do its thing. He gets all frustrated and says, “I’m just trying to remember what they told me to say.”
Buzz was also asked to swear on a Bible that he'd beento the moon and if he did the guy would donate thousands to a charity of his choice...he punched the guy!!!
Is the really the behaviour of someone who achieved one if the most amazing feats in history??"
If I had sat on top of a giant firework, been blasted into space with the G force pushing my cheeks up around my ears. Then travelled into the unknown, been one of the first to land on any object other than planet Earth, then some stupid fucker asked me to swear on a bible. I would have punched his fucking lights out. TWICE.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Its written all over armstrongs face i think ?
Look at his body language and facial expressions on tv, even in the porridge advert
That ladys and gents is the expression of a person who has carried mankinds biggest secret for 50-60 years and is likely treat like prisoner |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Yes it can.
Given enough oxygen the charcoal from your BBQ could do it as well.....the steel bowed outwards... Leaving the concrete floors to fall on to each other."
Well seeing how the atmosphere is less than 21 % oxygen and the blast from the exploding plane would like all explosions take the weakest link out ie the glazing.
Any remaining fuel wouldn't be near enough to create the heat to generate a storm effect fire...
I've worked in both structural construction and demolition and could see as it happened it wasn't right how it happened..
Since then ive seen the supposed detailed analysis of how it supposedly fell down.It just doesn't add up.
Coupled with all the air defence and everything away on exercise etc..seems someone was selling the need for a war... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tim commerford from the band Rage against the machine (who's father worked for NASA) recently remembered when he met Buzz Aldrin.
“I got into it with Buzz Aldrin five years ago at a John Cusack movie premiere. There were a bunch of people gathered around, and I said he said to him:
“I have a question: You have all these missions to the moon. How come there’s no pictures of the flags on the moon?” He said, “Well, those are highly degraded by radiation by now.” I said, “You left a lot of stuff on the moon. It seems that somebody with a telescope or satellite would snap a picture of that so we could see it. It’d be on the cover of every newspaper.”
“You could tell he was getting frustrated, and I asked him why he put a metal rod on top of the flag instead of just letting the flag out and do its thing. He gets all frustrated and says, “I’m just trying to remember what they told me to say.”
Buzz was also asked to swear on a Bible that he'd beento the moon and if he did the guy would donate thousands to a charity of his choice...he punched the guy!!!
Is the really the behaviour of someone who achieved one if the most amazing feats in history??
If I had sat on top of a giant firework, been blasted into space with the G force pushing my cheeks up around my ears. Then travelled into the unknown, been one of the first to land on any object other than planet Earth, then some stupid fucker asked me to swear on a bible. I would have punched his fucking lights out. TWICE.
"
Would you do the same in the witness box about having a shit ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Yes it can.
Given enough oxygen the charcoal from your BBQ could do it as well.....the steel bowed outwards... Leaving the concrete floors to fall on to each other.
these were the first and only steel skyscrapers to have ever collapsed through fire..the report was so corrupt... engineers around the world are challenging it."
Was the report corrupt? Possibly.
Were the Trade centre towers built to a substandard specification? Maybe.
Did a bunch of mad Mussies fly two planes into them? Certainly. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Yes it can.
Given enough oxygen the charcoal from your BBQ could do it as well.....the steel bowed outwards... Leaving the concrete floors to fall on to each other.
Well seeing how the atmosphere is less than 21 % oxygen and the blast from the exploding plane would like all explosions take the weakest link out ie the glazing.
Any remaining fuel wouldn't be near enough to create the heat to generate a storm effect fire...
I've worked in both structural construction and demolition and could see as it happened it wasn't right how it happened..
Since then ive seen the supposed detailed analysis of how it supposedly fell down.It just doesn't add up.
Coupled with all the air defence and everything away on exercise etc..seems someone was selling the need for a war..."
How many times have you observed those size buildings burn ?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Yes it can.
Given enough oxygen the charcoal from your BBQ could do it as well.....the steel bowed outwards... Leaving the concrete floors to fall on to each other.
these were the first and only steel skyscrapers to have ever collapsed through fire..the report was so corrupt... engineers around the world are challenging it."
Aye, weird, eh? Big planes crash into a structure and it collapses. Them engineers are darned puzzled as to how that could happen, unless the Lizard Race and their radon guns were involved. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"..seems someone was selling the need for a war..."
And obviously, because the U.S. has historically been so shy about intervening overseas, blowing up thousands of its own citizens was the only way they could go to war |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Yes it can.
Given enough oxygen the charcoal from your BBQ could do it as well.....the steel bowed outwards... Leaving the concrete floors to fall on to each other.
Well seeing how the atmosphere is less than 21 % oxygen and the blast from the exploding plane would like all explosions take the weakest link out ie the glazing.
Any remaining fuel wouldn't be near enough to create the heat to generate a storm effect fire...
I've worked in both structural construction and demolition and could see as it happened it wasn't right how it happened..
Since then ive seen the supposed detailed analysis of how it supposedly fell down.It just doesn't add up.
Coupled with all the air defence and everything away on exercise etc..seems someone was selling the need for a war...
How many times have you observed those size buildings burn ?
"
I dont really care how many other buildings youve demolished, youve only ever seen plains fly into the trade towers once
Youve only ever seen them collapse once
Ok more than 1 plane and more than 1 tower, all the same day
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
I did not need to melt it just get it cherry red and any strength in the bean soon goes
Structural steel as used in the trade towers has to be fore protected so even jet fuel burning wouldn't get it hot enough for it to collapse and who has ever seen a building that big collapse into its own foot print unless in a controlled demolition..."
yes the steel should have been coated in a fire resistant material, but there does not exist a fire resistant material which is capable of such an impact as occurred..
by its design and how its applied and after it sets, all fire resistant material is susceptible to impact..
there were issues as reported by the inspecting Fire Engineers going back to the early 90's with the fire resistant coatings in the towers were large sections had become loose since application..
also the ring main necessary to drop such a building would have been installed when and why? before the war on terror?
and any ring main is also not designed to survive the impact of a passenger plane, and why would one bother with both..? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Conspiracy theories were probably started by governments - and they certainly are prolific users of them now.
Its a great way to distract attention, mix real stories in with thr crap and we all start wearing tin foil hsts and miss the plot.
I guess the moon is real and probably the landings.
But space travel is too destructive of our own world, so would prefer it stopped. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tim commerford from the band Rage against the machine (who's father worked for NASA) recently remembered when he met Buzz Aldrin.
“I got into it with Buzz Aldrin five years ago at a John Cusack movie premiere. There were a bunch of people gathered around, and I said he said to him:
“I have a question: You have all these missions to the moon. How come there’s no pictures of the flags on the moon?” He said, “Well, those are highly degraded by radiation by now.” I said, “You left a lot of stuff on the moon. It seems that somebody with a telescope or satellite would snap a picture of that so we could see it. It’d be on the cover of every newspaper.”
“You could tell he was getting frustrated, and I asked him why he put a metal rod on top of the flag instead of just letting the flag out and do its thing. He gets all frustrated and says, “I’m just trying to remember what they told me to say.”
Buzz was also asked to swear on a Bible that he'd beento the moon and if he did the guy would donate thousands to a charity of his choice...he punched the guy!!!
Is the really the behaviour of someone who achieved one if the most amazing feats in history??
If I had sat on top of a giant firework, been blasted into space with the G force pushing my cheeks up around my ears. Then travelled into the unknown, been one of the first to land on any object other than planet Earth, then some stupid fucker asked me to swear on a bible. I would have punched his fucking lights out. TWICE.
Would you do the same in the witness box about having a shit ?"
Whatever that means?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *arksMan
over a year ago
in the centre |
"JFK was assasinated by the clangers for planning to invade the moon. FACT!"
he was actually assinated by pro Castro pigeons, they were heard on the book repository saying " coo ,coo " |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
In my opinion, the NASA landings did actually happen. The evidence is there.
9/11 is a different matter altogether, not whether it happened or not, but who was actually behind it  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Blame the lizard people its all down them and the Jews just face facts lol But just out interest has any one ever seen the Tex n results from when they where testing out injecting pure thc out in Holland a while back out of all the participants most reported seeing lizard people or people with gill type breathers on there necks ...all unrelated n no prior contact n lab test conditions and it was back before all the you tube conspiracy crap ....i could go on but not the place any one non judgmental enough to look at things from a medical n science point a view feel free to pm |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tonight's a good night to land on the moon ..... It's massive
It's actually about the same size - just loooks bigger. "
It's flippin humongous. On the Supermoon night it was rubbish. Tonight it's twice as big as normal. I might fly to it in a hot air balloon. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tonight's a good night to land on the moon ..... It's massive
It's actually about the same size - just loooks bigger.
It's flippin humongous. On the Supermoon night it was rubbish. Tonight it's twice as big as normal. I might fly to it in a hot air balloon."
It looks the same size here! That's so unfair! What moon are you two looking at? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago
Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum |
"Tonight's a good night to land on the moon ..... It's massive
It's actually about the same size - just loooks bigger.
It's flippin humongous. On the Supermoon night it was rubbish. Tonight it's twice as big as normal. I might fly to it in a hot air balloon.
It looks the same size here! That's so unfair! What moon are you two looking at? "
Yeah, its normal moon sized up here.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tonight's a good night to land on the moon ..... It's massive
It's actually about the same size - just loooks bigger.
It's flippin humongous. On the Supermoon night it was rubbish. Tonight it's twice as big as normal. I might fly to it in a hot air balloon.
It looks the same size here! That's so unfair! What moon are you two looking at? "
We have a better moon up north |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Yes it can.
Given enough oxygen the charcoal from your BBQ could do it as well.....the steel bowed outwards... Leaving the concrete floors to fall on to each other.
these were the first and only steel skyscrapers to have ever collapsed through fire..the report was so corrupt... engineers around the world are challenging it.
Was the report corrupt? Possibly.
Were the Trade centre towers built to a substandard specification? Maybe.
Did a bunch of mad Mussies fly two planes into them? Certainly."
Wow...I'm not sure whether I'm shocked at the racism or the fact that you're 'certain' a gang of people managed to hijack two planes with box cutters and other shanks and then both hit their targets perfectly and cause the worst destruction to New York in history??...
Mmmmm...what next...oh wait, that's right they found one of their passports in the road..??? Certainly must have been them, wait..half of them are actually saying they're still alive and Bin Laden has NEVER been officially accused of the crime...but...must have happened how the tellybox told us...just like them fellas that went to the moon. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Some interesting 9/11 facts...
There are thousands of witness testimonies from people who were in the building including hundreds from NYPD and fire department that state there was a series of explosions BEFORE any plane hit the towers. These explosions were in the basement causing damage and injuries to anyone in that area.... FACT
The telephone calls made by the people on the plane could not have been made from a plane at that altitude...FACT
At least 8 of the alleged hijackers reported to be responsible are still alive and have been identified... FACT
Larry Silverstein, head of the Silverstein group who had recently purchased the 99 year 3.2 Billion dollar lease hold of the WTC complex discovered that the buildings were an asbestos time bomb and would need at least 200 million dollars spent on removing it and making the buildings safe.
Instead he took out an insurance policy which coincidentally included "acts of terrorism".
After the attacks the insurers Swiss re argued that it was a single terrorist attack and tried to settle the claim at 3.5 Billion dollars. The Silverstein group challenged this and a following court case agreed it was two separate attacks so the insurers were forced to pay 4.6 Billion dollars out... Fact
All US military response aircraft were mysteriously sent on exercises that day which meant the hijacked planes were able to fly in the most highly guarded airspace in the world without any intervention... FACT
There are plenty more facts well documented which are all pretty damming. If your interested just look and find them.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It was real......the changers told me so!Changers, !!! is that the Clangers cousins."
Yes,they're second cousins to the Clingons who live on the dark side of the moon. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If it was a conspiracy and the building was rigged with explosives, it would be simpler to just exclude the jets from the plot and just say al quaeda just blew the towers up with explosives.
Doesn't pass a common sense test straight off. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If it was a conspiracy and the building was rigged with explosives, it would be simpler to just exclude the jets from the plot and just say al quaeda just blew the towers up with explosives.
Doesn't pass a common sense test straight off."
The official explanation which you obviously have swallowed does not stand up to scrutiny. There is no common sense involved.
Have you ever heard the saying "if you don't stand up for something you'll fall for anything" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If it was a conspiracy and the building was rigged with explosives, it would be simpler to just exclude the jets from the plot and just say al quaeda just blew the towers up with explosives.
Doesn't pass a common sense test straight off.
The official explanation which you obviously have swallowed does not stand up to scrutiny. There is no common sense involved.
Have you ever heard the saying "if you don't stand up for something you'll fall for anything""
I've not swallowed anything. The saying doesn't fit in, but feel free to enjoy believing what you will. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If it was a conspiracy and the building was rigged with explosives, it would be simpler to just exclude the jets from the plot and just say al quaeda just blew the towers up with explosives.
Doesn't pass a common sense test straight off.
The official explanation which you obviously have swallowed does not stand up to scrutiny. There is no common sense involved.
Have you ever heard the saying "if you don't stand up for something you'll fall for anything"
I've not swallowed anything. The saying doesn't fit in, but feel free to enjoy believing what you will. "
Thank you for granting me the freedom to think what I want, much appreciated  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Some interesting 9/11 facts...
There are thousands of witness testimonies from people who were in the building including hundreds from NYPD and fire department that state there was a series of explosions BEFORE any plane hit the towers. These explosions were in the basement causing damage and injuries to anyone in that area.... FACT
The telephone calls made by the people on the plane could not have been made from a plane at that altitude...FACT
At least 8 of the alleged hijackers reported to be responsible are still alive and have been identified... FACT
Larry Silverstein, head of the Silverstein group who had recently purchased the 99 year 3.2 Billion dollar lease hold of the WTC complex discovered that the buildings were an asbestos time bomb and would need at least 200 million dollars spent on removing it and making the buildings safe.
Instead he took out an insurance policy which coincidentally included "acts of terrorism".
After the attacks the insurers Swiss re argued that it was a single terrorist attack and tried to settle the claim at 3.5 Billion dollars. The Silverstein group challenged this and a following court case agreed it was two separate attacks so the insurers were forced to pay 4.6 Billion dollars out... Fact
All US military response aircraft were mysteriously sent on exercises that day which meant the hijacked planes were able to fly in the most highly guarded airspace in the world without any intervention... FACT
There are plenty more facts well documented which are all pretty damming. If your interested just look and find them.
"
Just as you can search for "facts" like those above, they can also be debunked with google searches. It's nice that people question things, but I'm inclined to believe reputable sources, rather than truther blogs. But people will search for whatever backs up their beliefs - we are obviously just on different ends of the spectrum here.
For me, the simple fact that thousands of people would be required to keep the cover up secret makes it highly unlikely to be a huge conspiracy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Some interesting 9/11 facts...
There are thousands of witness testimonies from people who were in the building including hundreds from NYPD and fire department that state there was a series of explosions BEFORE any plane hit the towers. These explosions were in the basement causing damage and injuries to anyone in that area.... FACT
The telephone calls made by the people on the plane could not have been made from a plane at that altitude...FACT
At least 8 of the alleged hijackers reported to be responsible are still alive and have been identified... FACT
Larry Silverstein, head of the Silverstein group who had recently purchased the 99 year 3.2 Billion dollar lease hold of the WTC complex discovered that the buildings were an asbestos time bomb and would need at least 200 million dollars spent on removing it and making the buildings safe.
Instead he took out an insurance policy which coincidentally included "acts of terrorism".
After the attacks the insurers Swiss re argued that it was a single terrorist attack and tried to settle the claim at 3.5 Billion dollars. The Silverstein group challenged this and a following court case agreed it was two separate attacks so the insurers were forced to pay 4.6 Billion dollars out... Fact
All US military response aircraft were mysteriously sent on exercises that day which meant the hijacked planes were able to fly in the most highly guarded airspace in the world without any intervention... FACT
There are plenty more facts well documented which are all pretty damming. If your interested just look and find them.
Just as you can search for "facts" like those above, they can also be debunked with google searches. It's nice that people question things, but I'm inclined to believe reputable sources, rather than truther blogs. But people will search for whatever backs up their beliefs - we are obviously just on different ends of the spectrum here.
For me, the simple fact that thousands of people would be required to keep the cover up secret makes it highly unlikely to be a huge conspiracy."
Fair point well presented but I must take issue with your "reputable sources" statement.
It may only be me, I may be perhaps a little paranoid but what I have learned in my life is that ALL politicians are liars. They will happily piss on your shoes and tell you it is raining. You may have experienced evidence of this before and especially after an election or referendum. So personally I choose not to believe what I am told by a bunch of liars.
But hey that's just me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *horltzMan
over a year ago
heysham |
"Tonight's a good night to land on the moon ..... It's massive
It's actually about the same size - just loooks bigger.
It's flippin humongous. On the Supermoon night it was rubbish. Tonight it's twice as big as normal. I might fly to it in a hot air balloon.
It looks the same size here! That's so unfair! What moon are you two looking at? "
A really really big one , so big you could land on it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All these FACTS will make the court case pretty straightforward, the jury will just need half a day on google to mop it all up.
In the afternoon they can sort out the moon landing.
Sorted."
There will never be a court case, that's just a hunch, I've heard Judge Judy's diary is full |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Jesus it feels like the schools have broken up early.
911 - rigging a building with explosives takes a little planning and a fair bit of preparation work. Planning and preparation that would not have gone unnoticed. Crazy men drove planes into the towers and made a bit of a mess. Whether the governments knew about it and let it happen is another story that might have legs.
Moon - just google the conspiracy and you will find ten reasons debunking that conspiracy. It happened. Move on.
Some ideas on this thread are crazier than the plane on a treadmill!!!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Some interesting 9/11 facts...
There are thousands of witness testimonies from people who were in the building including hundreds from NYPD and fire department that state there was a series of explosions BEFORE any plane hit the towers. These explosions were in the basement causing damage and injuries to anyone in that area.... FACT
The telephone calls made by the people on the plane could not have been made from a plane at that altitude...FACT
At least 8 of the alleged hijackers reported to be responsible are still alive and have been identified... FACT
Larry Silverstein, head of the Silverstein group who had recently purchased the 99 year 3.2 Billion dollar lease hold of the WTC complex discovered that the buildings were an asbestos time bomb and would need at least 200 million dollars spent on removing it and making the buildings safe.
Instead he took out an insurance policy which coincidentally included "acts of terrorism".
After the attacks the insurers Swiss re argued that it was a single terrorist attack and tried to settle the claim at 3.5 Billion dollars. The Silverstein group challenged this and a following court case agreed it was two separate attacks so the insurers were forced to pay 4.6 Billion dollars out... Fact
All US military response aircraft were mysteriously sent on exercises that day which meant the hijacked planes were able to fly in the most highly guarded airspace in the world without any intervention... FACT
There are plenty more facts well documented which are all pretty damming. If your interested just look and find them.
Just as you can search for "facts" like those above, they can also be debunked with google searches. It's nice that people question things, but I'm inclined to believe reputable sources, rather than truther blogs. But people will search for whatever backs up their beliefs - we are obviously just on different ends of the spectrum here.
For me, the simple fact that thousands of people would be required to keep the cover up secret makes it highly unlikely to be a huge conspiracy.
Fair point well presented but I must take issue with your "reputable sources" statement.
It may only be me, I may be perhaps a little paranoid but what I have learned in my life is that ALL politicians are liars. They will happily piss on your shoes and tell you it is raining. You may have experienced evidence of this before and especially after an election or referendum. So personally I choose not to believe what I am told by a bunch of liars.
But hey that's just me "
I agree with you about not trusting politicians! They're usually lying about something or other.
But I do trust respected scientists and structural engineers. Like Popular Mechanics magazine's 5,000 word article debunking the myths about jet fuel, beams, the planes etc.
There's a reason that the truther movement has been on the decline for years, and why the media doesn't report on what would be the biggest story in decades - there is no conspiracy.
Those who believe there is have been duped by others whose healthy skepticism has turned to obsessive paranoia... and a desire to sell books
Again, if you still believe than that's your choice. I just don't like to sit back silent while truthers try to ram their beliefs down everyone's throats like they are objective facts and not just theories based on inaccurate, misleading information. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Some interesting 9/11 facts...
There are thousands of witness testimonies from people who were in the building including hundreds from NYPD and fire department that state there was a series of explosions BEFORE any plane hit the towers. These explosions were in the basement causing damage and injuries to anyone in that area.... FACT
The telephone calls made by the people on the plane could not have been made from a plane at that altitude...FACT
At least 8 of the alleged hijackers reported to be responsible are still alive and have been identified... FACT
Larry Silverstein, head of the Silverstein group who had recently purchased the 99 year 3.2 Billion dollar lease hold of the WTC complex discovered that the buildings were an asbestos time bomb and would need at least 200 million dollars spent on removing it and making the buildings safe.
Instead he took out an insurance policy which coincidentally included "acts of terrorism".
After the attacks the insurers Swiss re argued that it was a single terrorist attack and tried to settle the claim at 3.5 Billion dollars. The Silverstein group challenged this and a following court case agreed it was two separate attacks so the insurers were forced to pay 4.6 Billion dollars out... Fact
All US military response aircraft were mysteriously sent on exercises that day which meant the hijacked planes were able to fly in the most highly guarded airspace in the world without any intervention... FACT
There are plenty more facts well documented which are all pretty damming. If your interested just look and find them.
Just as you can search for "facts" like those above, they can also be debunked with google searches. It's nice that people question things, but I'm inclined to believe reputable sources, rather than truther blogs. But people will search for whatever backs up their beliefs - we are obviously just on different ends of the spectrum here.
For me, the simple fact that thousands of people would be required to keep the cover up secret makes it highly unlikely to be a huge conspiracy.
Fair point well presented but I must take issue with your "reputable sources" statement.
It may only be me, I may be perhaps a little paranoid but what I have learned in my life is that ALL politicians are liars. They will happily piss on your shoes and tell you it is raining. You may have experienced evidence of this before and especially after an election or referendum. So personally I choose not to believe what I am told by a bunch of liars.
But hey that's just me
I agree with you about not trusting politicians! They're usually lying about something or other.
But I do trust respected scientists and structural engineers. Like Popular Mechanics magazine's 5,000 word article debunking the myths about jet fuel, beams, the planes etc.
There's a reason that the truther movement has been on the decline for years, and why the media doesn't report on what would be the biggest story in decades - there is no conspiracy.
Those who believe there is have been duped by others whose healthy skepticism has turned to obsessive paranoia... and a desire to sell books
Again, if you still believe than that's your choice. I just don't like to sit back silent while truthers try to ram their beliefs down everyone's throats like they are objective facts and not just theories based on inaccurate, misleading information. "
So the testimonies of the hundreds of NYPD and firefighters who were AT THE SCENE that there were a series of explosions before any plane hit should be ignored? How did Popular Mechanics magazine debunk them? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Some interesting 9/11 facts...
There are thousands of witness testimonies from people who were in the building including hundreds from NYPD and fire department that state there was a series of explosions BEFORE any plane hit the towers. These explosions were in the basement causing damage and injuries to anyone in that area.... FACT
The telephone calls made by the people on the plane could not have been made from a plane at that altitude...FACT
At least 8 of the alleged hijackers reported to be responsible are still alive and have been identified... FACT
Larry Silverstein, head of the Silverstein group who had recently purchased the 99 year 3.2 Billion dollar lease hold of the WTC complex discovered that the buildings were an asbestos time bomb and would need at least 200 million dollars spent on removing it and making the buildings safe.
Instead he took out an insurance policy which coincidentally included "acts of terrorism".
After the attacks the insurers Swiss re argued that it was a single terrorist attack and tried to settle the claim at 3.5 Billion dollars. The Silverstein group challenged this and a following court case agreed it was two separate attacks so the insurers were forced to pay 4.6 Billion dollars out... Fact
All US military response aircraft were mysteriously sent on exercises that day which meant the hijacked planes were able to fly in the most highly guarded airspace in the world without any intervention... FACT
There are plenty more facts well documented which are all pretty damming. If your interested just look and find them.
Just as you can search for "facts" like those above, they can also be debunked with google searches. It's nice that people question things, but I'm inclined to believe reputable sources, rather than truther blogs. But people will search for whatever backs up their beliefs - we are obviously just on different ends of the spectrum here.
For me, the simple fact that thousands of people would be required to keep the cover up secret makes it highly unlikely to be a huge conspiracy.
Fair point well presented but I must take issue with your "reputable sources" statement.
It may only be me, I may be perhaps a little paranoid but what I have learned in my life is that ALL politicians are liars. They will happily piss on your shoes and tell you it is raining. You may have experienced evidence of this before and especially after an election or referendum. So personally I choose not to believe what I am told by a bunch of liars.
But hey that's just me
I agree with you about not trusting politicians! They're usually lying about something or other.
But I do trust respected scientists and structural engineers. Like Popular Mechanics magazine's 5,000 word article debunking the myths about jet fuel, beams, the planes etc.
There's a reason that the truther movement has been on the decline for years, and why the media doesn't report on what would be the biggest story in decades - there is no conspiracy.
Those who believe there is have been duped by others whose healthy skepticism has turned to obsessive paranoia... and a desire to sell books
Again, if you still believe than that's your choice. I just don't like to sit back silent while truthers try to ram their beliefs down everyone's throats like they are objective facts and not just theories based on inaccurate, misleading information.
So the testimonies of the hundreds of NYPD and firefighters who were AT THE SCENE that there were a series of explosions before any plane hit should be ignored? How did Popular Mechanics magazine debunk them?"
There are many types of loud sharp noises that are not caused by explosives, and seismographic records of the collapse do not show evidence of explosions. If there was a controlled demolition then you would hear a series of closely spaced very loud bangs, but there is no audio evidence of this.
A quick internet search will surely help you with any other questions you have. I'm no expert, but I trust the experts in these fields, not people who just want to believe the man is behind it all. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
So the testimonies of the hundreds of NYPD and firefighters who were AT THE SCENE that there were a series of explosions before any plane hit should be ignored? How did Popular Mechanics magazine debunk them?"
What did the survivors inside the building say about all these explosions before the plane hit? Nothing, because they didn't happen. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
So the testimonies of the hundreds of NYPD and firefighters who were AT THE SCENE that there were a series of explosions before any plane hit should be ignored? How did Popular Mechanics magazine debunk them?
What did the survivors inside the building say about all these explosions before the plane hit? Nothing, because they didn't happen."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *osieWoman
over a year ago
Wembley |
"
So the testimonies of the hundreds of NYPD and firefighters who were AT THE SCENE that there were a series of explosions before any plane hit should be ignored? How did Popular Mechanics magazine debunk them?
What did the survivors inside the building say about all these explosions before the plane hit? Nothing, because they didn't happen."
Simple; they too were part of the conspiracy.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Find it pretty disrespectful to the families of the people that died in the twin towers that people keep bringing up these crackpot conspiracy theories, it's bordering on the lines of a man in the pub told me x so it's got to be true.
Re the moon landings get over it because it happened
All the conspiracy believers can all go back to coating your house in tin foil so that "they" can't find you and come and get you
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If it was a conspiracy and the building was rigged with explosives, it would be simpler to just exclude the jets from the plot and just say al quaeda just blew the towers up with explosives.
Doesn't pass a common sense test straight off."
Quite so. All this waffle about melting points, but no simple explanation as to why the U.S. would damage its own infrastructure and kill its own people when there are literally dozens of easier ways to make a case to go to war in Iraq. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You do know they shine a laser beam at a reflector that was placed on the moon to measylure the distance ... it's how they know it's moving away from earth at a rate of 3.8 cm... Or in measurements useful on fab about the extra length most guys add to their cock measurements
Any idea why its moving away from earth ? Is there a stronger gravitational pull pulling it away ? Or is earth loosing its gravitational pull ?
The moon has the gravitation pull to move tides but why does the oceans not end up in outer space ? "
It has been moving further and further away from the Earth ever since it was created by an Earth collision event with another planetary body.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If it was a conspiracy and the building was rigged with explosives, it would be simpler to just exclude the jets from the plot and just say al quaeda just blew the towers up with explosives.
Doesn't pass a common sense test straight off.
Quite so. All this waffle about melting points, but no simple explanation as to why the U.S. would damage its own infrastructure and kill its own people when there are literally dozens of easier ways to make a case to go to war in Iraq."
.
Or just pay 19 crazy Arabs to do it for you and then help them as much as possible by confusing NORAD with same day simulations... You could probably syphon the money of very easily from the missing billions you'd already admitted to the day before, you could pass it on through high ranking Pakistani secret service who have a genuine interest in doing it anyhow, then blame it all on a guy who you've already treated in a military hospital and know is going to die anyhow from kidney disease!.
.
That's how I'd do it anyhow  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I visited the moon last night, landed had tea and cake then back home and if anyone would like to prove me a liar then please show me your proof
Exactly there is none for my claims as there is none for the incidents previously mentioned on this thread
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Find it pretty disrespectful to the families of the people that died in the twin towers that people keep bringing up these crackpot conspiracy theories, it's bordering on the lines of a man in the pub told me x so it's got to be true.
Re the moon landings get over it because it happened
All the conspiracy believers can all go back to coating your house in tin foil so that "they" can't find you and come and get you
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If it was a conspiracy and the building was rigged with explosives, it would be simpler to just exclude the jets from the plot and just say al quaeda just blew the towers up with explosives.
Doesn't pass a common sense test straight off.
Quite so. All this waffle about melting points, but no simple explanation as to why the U.S. would damage its own infrastructure and kill its own people when there are literally dozens of easier ways to make a case to go to war in Iraq..
Or just pay 19 crazy Arabs to do it for you and then help them as much as possible by confusing NORAD with same day simulations... You could probably syphon the money of very easily from the missing billions you'd already admitted to the day before, you could pass it on through high ranking Pakistani secret service who have a genuine interest in doing it anyhow, then blame it all on a guy who you've already treated in a military hospital and know is going to die anyhow from kidney disease!.
.
That's how I'd do it anyhow "
When the insurance company were arguing in court about paying out only £3.6Bn instead of whatever figure, it's a pity they didn't have the conspiracy theory experts to hand. They would then have simply paid nothing, with this clear cut evidence. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If it was a conspiracy and the building was rigged with explosives, it would be simpler to just exclude the jets from the plot and just say al quaeda just blew the towers up with explosives.
Doesn't pass a common sense test straight off.
Quite so. All this waffle about melting points, but no simple explanation as to why the U.S. would damage its own infrastructure and kill its own people when there are literally dozens of easier ways to make a case to go to war in Iraq..
Or just pay 19 crazy Arabs to do it for you and then help them as much as possible by confusing NORAD with same day simulations... You could probably syphon the money of very easily from the missing billions you'd already admitted to the day before, you could pass it on through high ranking Pakistani secret service who have a genuine interest in doing it anyhow, then blame it all on a guy who you've already treated in a military hospital and know is going to die anyhow from kidney disease!.
.
That's how I'd do it anyhow
When the insurance company were arguing in court about paying out only £3.6Bn instead of whatever figure, it's a pity they didn't have the conspiracy theory experts to hand. They would then have simply paid nothing, with this clear cut evidence."
There is no concrete proof, which insurance company would require to be refuse to pay out |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Anyway im out of this now because no offence but brain cells are not everyones strong point, please i beg you do not ask me for a meet lol
Trust me id be bored out my fukin skull |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Anyway im out of this now because no offence but brain cells are not everyones strong point, please i beg you do not ask me for a meet lol
Trust me id be bored out my fukin skull"
OK, you're far to intelligent for us simple souls (although your brain cells aren't being used for spelling).
Have fun at the University of the Internet. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Find it pretty disrespectful to the families of the people that died in the twin towers that people keep bringing up these crackpot conspiracy theories, it's bordering on the lines of a man in the pub told me x so it's got to be true.
Re the moon landings get over it because it happened
All the conspiracy believers can all go back to coating your house in tin foil so that "they" can't find you and come and get you
"
..so the official line that we all should believe is that the 4 flight and cockpit voice recorders (black boxes) from the flights that hit the towers were completely obliterated to the point there wasn't a trace of them left BUT one if the terrorists passports was found in the rubble a short time later?....hmmmm yeah ok |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Find it pretty disrespectful to the families of the people that died in the twin towers that people keep bringing up these crackpot conspiracy theories, it's bordering on the lines of a man in the pub told me x so it's got to be true.
Re the moon landings get over it because it happened
All the conspiracy believers can all go back to coating your house in tin foil so that "they" can't find you and come and get you
..so the official line that we all should believe is that the 4 flight and cockpit voice recorders (black boxes) from the flights that hit the towers were completely obliterated to the point there wasn't a trace of them left BUT one if the terrorists passports was found in the rubble a short time later?....hmmmm yeah ok "
Although i said im done with this thread
Road traffic accidents in which folk have been decapatated and head found 3 fields away from the burnt out vehicle
Or even a wheel found 3 wheels away from that completly burnt out vehicle
There is no proof that the passport didnt fly from the impact as soon as the cockpit windows was shattered |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Find it pretty disrespectful to the families of the people that died in the twin towers that people keep bringing up these crackpot conspiracy theories, it's bordering on the lines of a man in the pub told me x so it's got to be true.
Re the moon landings get over it because it happened
All the conspiracy believers can all go back to coating your house in tin foil so that "they" can't find you and come and get you
..so the official line that we all should believe is that the 4 flight and cockpit voice recorders (black boxes) from the flights that hit the towers were completely obliterated to the point there wasn't a trace of them left BUT one if the terrorists passports was found in the rubble a short time later?....hmmmm yeah ok
Although i said im done with this thread
Road traffic accidents in which folk have been decapatated and head found 3 fields away from the burnt out vehicle
Or even a wheel found 3 wheels away from that completly burnt out vehicle
There is no proof that the passport didnt fly from the impact as soon as the cockpit windows was shattered "
Fields away before the underage grammer police or the sad little old men who aint had none in years gets on my case lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Find it pretty disrespectful to the families of the people that died in the twin towers that people keep bringing up these crackpot conspiracy theories, it's bordering on the lines of a man in the pub told me x so it's got to be true.
Re the moon landings get over it because it happened
All the conspiracy believers can all go back to coating your house in tin foil so that "they" can't find you and come and get you
..so the official line that we all should believe is that the 4 flight and cockpit voice recorders (black boxes) from the flights that hit the towers were completely obliterated to the point there wasn't a trace of them left BUT one if the terrorists passports was found in the rubble a short time later?....hmmmm yeah ok
Although i said im done with this thread
Road traffic accidents in which folk have been decapatated and head found 3 fields away from the burnt out vehicle
Or even a wheel found 3 wheels away from that completly burnt out vehicle
There is no proof that the passport didnt fly from the impact as soon as the cockpit windows was shattered "
Wtf has a road traffic accident got to do with a passenger aircraft smashing into a building at over 500mph?... Did he throw it out of the window just before impact?....that'll be it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Find it pretty disrespectful to the families of the people that died in the twin towers that people keep bringing up these crackpot conspiracy theories, it's bordering on the lines of a man in the pub told me x so it's got to be true.
Re the moon landings get over it because it happened
All the conspiracy believers can all go back to coating your house in tin foil so that "they" can't find you and come and get you
..so the official line that we all should believe is that the 4 flight and cockpit voice recorders (black boxes) from the flights that hit the towers were completely obliterated to the point there wasn't a trace of them left BUT one if the terrorists passports was found in the rubble a short time later?....hmmmm yeah ok
Although i said im done with this thread
Road traffic accidents in which folk have been decapatated and head found 3 fields away from the burnt out vehicle
Or even a wheel found 3 wheels away from that completly burnt out vehicle
There is no proof that the passport didnt fly from the impact as soon as the cockpit windows was shattered
Wtf has a road traffic accident got to do with a passenger aircraft smashing into a building at over 500mph?... Did he throw it out of the window just before impact?....that'll be it "
Because you have done a test to see if its possible for a passport to fly out of the cockpit window upon impact
No i didnt you had
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Find it pretty disrespectful to the families of the people that died in the twin towers that people keep bringing up these crackpot conspiracy theories, it's bordering on the lines of a man in the pub told me x so it's got to be true.
Re the moon landings get over it because it happened
All the conspiracy believers can all go back to coating your house in tin foil so that "they" can't find you and come and get you
..so the official line that we all should believe is that the 4 flight and cockpit voice recorders (black boxes) from the flights that hit the towers were completely obliterated to the point there wasn't a trace of them left BUT one if the terrorists passports was found in the rubble a short time later?....hmmmm yeah ok
Although i said im done with this thread
Road traffic accidents in which folk have been decapatated and head found 3 fields away from the burnt out vehicle
Or even a wheel found 3 wheels away from that completly burnt out vehicle
There is no proof that the passport didnt fly from the impact as soon as the cockpit windows was shattered
Wtf has a road traffic accident got to do with a passenger aircraft smashing into a building at over 500mph?... Did he throw it out of the window just before impact?....that'll be it
Because you have done a test to see if its possible for a passport to fly out of the cockpit window upon impact
No i didnt you had
"
Think ^^^ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
