FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > HIV in the UK - scary!
HIV in the UK - scary!
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *arnayguy OP Man
over a year ago
Durham Tees |
A report recently published says there are now 96,000 people living with the virus in the UK. That's a full Wembley Stadium, 96,000!!!
Health officials also warned that A QUARTER OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE VIRUS ARE UNAWARE THEY ARE INFECTED!
Unsafe sex was given as the reason for an increase in numbers.
Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
Gay, bi, curious or straight, please don't take any risks. You never fully know if the other person has.
Cover up people! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
"
That seem like quite an alarmist claim….!.
Could you please provide the source of your information!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
That seem like quite an alarmist claim….!.
Could you please provide the source of your information! "
Here are some of the recent statistics:
96,000 people are living with HIV in the UK. 24 per cent of these people are undiagnosed and do not know about their HIV infection. In 2011, 500 people with HIV died. There were 6,280 new diagnoses in 2011. Nearly half (47 per cent) of the of people diagnosed with HIV in 2011 were diagnosed late, after they should have already started treatment. 48 per cent of new HIV diagnoses in 2011 were among men who have sex with men. All data is taken from the Health Protection Agency (HPA).
Sourcr: Terrence Higgins Trust. The National AIDS Trust.... Both show the same statistics.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
That seem like quite an alarmist claim….!.
Could you please provide the source of your information! "
Without posting the link, read the health page ans associated links on the bbc news web site |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The scary thing is there are people (possibly on here) that are having sex protected/unprotected without the knowledge they are HIV positive.
I wonder if everyone on here was questioned, what percentage would actually be tested ?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Nothing scary there if you always protect yourself and not playing any foul game"
I agree... AIDS no longer needs to stand for Arse Injected Death Sentence if only people were more responsible and not so selfish as to want to risk shortening their own lives as well as others by having unprotected sex.
Getting tested after you've had some gay man bareback probing your sphincter or some bare-cocked bi guy pummelling your wife's Schnowzer is like closing the stable door AFTER leading supermarket chains have stolen your horse. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Another fact I picked up from the HPA 2011 statistics is that of all people that are receiving treatment for HIV in the uk a small majority of them define themselves as heterosexual compared to the slightly smaller number of those that state they are bi or gay. One of the fastest growing groups of new diagnosis in the UK is heterosexuals over the age of 50.
My point is that HIV is NOT a gay or bi condition, we are all at risk regardless of our sexuality or sexual preferences.
As has previously been said on here there is no such thing as safe sex , only safer sex, and through condom use and regular testing your own risk and the risk you hold for those you play with is significantly lessened. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The scary thing is there are people (possibly on here) that are having sex protected/unprotected without the knowledge they are HIV positive.
I wonder if everyone on here was questioned, what percentage would actually be tested ? "
I hope to god everyone in this get tested alot over the year if meeting people even for safe sex .. as oral even kissing you can get things. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
That seem like quite an alarmist claim….!.
Could you please provide the source of your information!
Here are some of the recent statistics:
96,000 people are living with HIV in the UK. 24 per cent of these people are undiagnosed and do not know about their HIV infection. In 2011, 500 people with HIV died. There were 6,280 new diagnoses in 2011. Nearly half (47 per cent) of the of people diagnosed with HIV in 2011 were diagnosed late, after they should have already started treatment. 48 per cent of new HIV diagnoses in 2011 were among men who have sex with men. All data is taken from the Health Protection Agency (HPA).
Sourcr: Terrence Higgins Trust. The National AIDS Trust.... Both show the same statistics.
"
I'm probably being a bit thick here (not had much sleep and brain not working) but if 24% of the 96,000 people that have HIV don't know they've got HIV how the hell does anyone else know? Did they test them, find it positive then tell them they were ok? I'm confused! Lol x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The scary thing is there are people (possibly on here) that are having sex protected/unprotected without the knowledge they are HIV positive.
I wonder if everyone on here was questioned, what percentage would actually be tested ? I hope to god everyone in this get tested alot over the year if meeting people even for safe sex .. as oral even kissing you can get things."
Alas we will never know but I bet there's a lot more that turn a blind eye and don't get tested than you think.
How many people never go to the doctors when they find a lump? Head in the sand syndrome |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I guess providing estimated statistic is obviously not an exact science….
There are even some statistics available suggesting the number of gay or bisexual males in the UK could be approximately three million six hundred thousand, which when equated to the HPA claims of 1 in 20 rate of HIV infection rate equals approximately 180,000 cases,,,
Which is nearly twice that of their own estimated 96,000 claim
Which ever is neared the truth,,,, the truth is, its not worth taking risks…
PS...Oh ,if my maths is wrong.... I've got an excuss ready,, so there.!!!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The scary thing is there are people (possibly on here) that are having sex protected/unprotected without the knowledge they are HIV positive.
I wonder if everyone on here was questioned, what percentage would actually be tested ? I hope to god everyone in this get tested alot over the year if meeting people even for safe sex .. as oral even kissing you can get things.
Alas we will never know but I bet there's a lot more that turn a blind eye and don't get tested than you think.
How many people never go to the doctors when they find a lump? Head in the sand syndrome"
Do you know maybe one day if a swinger you may have to show passport when tested to people we meet and to get into clubs... Your only clean and 100% safe when coming out the door of the gum if teast show you are. If meeting strangers for sex its high risk sex with people you don't know is and always will be. So each persons a risk . Its true. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A report recently published says there are now 96,000 people living with the virus in the UK. That's a full Wembley Stadium, 96,000!!!
Health officials also warned that A QUARTER OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE VIRUS ARE UNAWARE THEY ARE INFECTED!
Unsafe sex was given as the reason for an increase in numbers.
Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
Gay, bi, curious or straight, please don't take any risks. You never fully know if the other person has.
Cover up people!"
Very important to keep sex safe  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
What does surprise me is how many people don't know about g.u.m and how easy and free it is to access it......most people are afraid or fell silly to go...I've worked there ive seen the bad side of it..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
to be honest I find the figure of one in 12 in
London a bot hard to believe. and as
someone said,how do they come up with a
figure of 24% for undiagnosed cases.
someones pulling figures out of a hat |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nnyMan
over a year ago
Glasgow |
I posted this a few days back.
"Interesting discussion on Radio 4 a while back with a guy from one of the HIV/ Aids charities questioning whether the use of the word 'bareback' encouraged practices which made the spread of infection easier than the word 'unsafe' (as opposed to 'safe') sex.
He pointed out (I dunno if it's true) that bareback movies are becoming the norm in the USA and that this is having an effect on the behaviour of regular folk." |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"its on the rise apparently and not really a surprise as there was a thread on here a short while ago with loads defending bareback gangbangs ffs."
Errr u suggesting that fab members have been shown to have a link with this rise then? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The bit that really gets my goat is the suggestion that only gay/bi men spread HIV. 
I know plenty of straight people who are convinced the GUM clinic is not for them cos they don't have sex with prostitutes (cos even off duty ones have prossie tattooed across their tits) and they practice safe sex except for a) when d*unk and b) when they've known the other person for a few weeks and of course c) when doing it up the arse with another hetero cos, well, you can't get preggers up the arse. Oh and lets not forget the fact that they're completely straight and so is everyone that anyone who has ever had sex with anyone they've had sex with.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
The figures have been on the years for a few years now. Some of the guestimate comes from the cases that are seen and an extrapolation from that of other sexual partners that may have been infected that can't be contacted. The rest they extrapolate from the trend statistics and from presentation of other STIs.
The over 50s are a particular worry as they assume their past clean history and the fact that they can't get pregnant is enough protection. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The scary thing is there are people (possibly on here) that are having sex protected/unprotected without the knowledge they are HIV positive.
I wonder if everyone on here was questioned, what percentage would actually be tested ? "
No, the scary thing is that there are people on here who think wearing a condom for vaginal / anal sex is a 100% effective safety measure.
It isn't, a condom reduces the risk, that is all. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *b430Man
over a year ago
Tayside |
"The scary thing is there are people (possibly on here) that are having sex protected/unprotected without the knowledge they are HIV positive.
I wonder if everyone on here was questioned, what percentage would actually be tested ?
No, the scary thing is that there are people on here who think wearing a condom for vaginal / anal sex is a 100% effective safety measure.
It isn't, a condom reduces the risk, that is all."
You should start a thread stating that!   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
"The scary thing is there are people (possibly on here) that are having sex protected/unprotected without the knowledge they are HIV positive.
I wonder if everyone on here was questioned, what percentage would actually be tested ?
No, the scary thing is that there are people on here who think wearing a condom for vaginal / anal sex is a 100% effective safety measure.
It isn't, a condom reduces the risk, that is all."
My point exactly! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
That seem like quite an alarmist claim….!.
Could you please provide the source of your information!
Here are some of the recent statistics:
96,000 people are living with HIV in the UK. 24 per cent of these people are undiagnosed and do not know about their HIV infection. In 2011, 500 people with HIV died. There were 6,280 new diagnoses in 2011. Nearly half (47 per cent) of the of people diagnosed with HIV in 2011 were diagnosed late, after they should have already started treatment. 48 per cent of new HIV diagnoses in 2011 were among men who have sex with men. All data is taken from the Health Protection Agency (HPA).
Sourcr: Terrence Higgins Trust. The National AIDS Trust.... Both show the same statistics.
"
How do they know 24% of the 96000 are HIV , that figure can't be proved until those 24% have been tested surely |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The scary thing is there are people (possibly on here) that are having sex protected/unprotected without the knowledge they are HIV positive.
I wonder if everyone on here was questioned, what percentage would actually be tested ?
No, the scary thing is that there are people on here who think wearing a condom for vaginal / anal sex is a 100% effective safety measure.
It isn't, a condom reduces the risk, that is all."
Short of celibacy, reducing risk using what methods are available including condoms and regular testing, is better than no condones and no testing |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Doesn't shock me ive come across so many profiles of women and men who state they prefer bareback and with multiple verifications.
People really need to screw their heads on with regard to having unprotected sex,unless they are in a relationship and know they are safe to. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think the 96000 is just a number and does not say much if you see it as a tiny percentage of the sexually active population.
Also, HIV is now a chronic disease as ppl can live with the virus for 25 years. More important is knowing how many NEW infections there are per year as this gives you and idea of how the virus is spreading.
Still a condom is the best way of reducing your chances of getting this and other viruses so I only play safe... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Short of celibacy, reducing risk using what methods are available including condoms and regular testing, is better than no condones and no testing"
Driving at 70 is better than driving at 80.
You still don't want to be in an RTA at anything above 10 mph
This is the hypocricy of FAB, every OTHER fucker is the dangerous driver, me I am a good driver and can do 90 safely. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I did hear once that the incubation period could be as long as 10 yrs before it manifests itself "
Yes this is true, anyone who has a hiv test, the sample is kept for ten years. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I love the naivety of the whole situation. People are so busy that HIV and AIDS are forgotten every few years and then they wonder why it's getting worse.
I apologise if anyone is offended but when is the wake up call, please? Constant bombardment of information makes people switch off. Action makes people motivated.
First World Solutions! "It's not my fault, I'm safe" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The scary thing is there are people (possibly on here) that are having sex protected/unprotected without the knowledge they are HIV positive.
I wonder if everyone on here was questioned, what percentage would actually be tested ?
No, the scary thing is that there are people on here who think wearing a condom for vaginal / anal sex is a 100% effective safety measure.
It isn't, a condom reduces the risk, that is all."
]
Exactly.... Reduces the risk!... Pretty much the same as wearing a seat belt in a car. If you get hit chances are your gonna get hurt, seat belt reduces the damage taken. You can't alleviate all risk, but there is a moral obligation if nothing else, to minimise the potential impact on others. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iewMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Angus & Findhorn |
all the best to all living with HIV/Aids.
hey, it could be me.... so far the protection I have taken has worked, I will continue to protect myself to the highest possible level.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
"all the best to all living with HIV/Aids.
hey, it could be me.... so far the protection I have taken has worked, I will continue to protect myself to the highest possible level.
"
Sums it up in a very humane and genuine way! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"all the best to all living with HIV/Aids.
hey, it could be me.... so far the protection I have taken has worked, I will continue to protect myself to the highest possible level.
"
Fuck me, do you wear condoms like Russian Dolls |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
To add to the debate safe sex does not exist. Those practising safer sexual practices leeen the chance of accquiring a STI including HIV.
The accquistion of the virus is a major event in anyones life and with support and new treatments it is possible to lead a full and active life. However there is no room for complacency and as those above have pointed out the use of condoms and sexual health check ups helps to stop the infection rate from increasing.
Crossing the road is risky but if you follow the green cross code then you are likely to remain intact! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I did hear once that the incubation period could be as long as 10 yrs before it manifests itself
Yes this is true, anyone who has a hiv test, the sample is kept for ten years. "
I went for my samples week past thursday and was told the patient records go back 10 yrs not the actual samples. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I did hear once that the incubation period could be as long as 10 yrs before it manifests itself
Yes this is true, anyone who has a hiv test, the sample is kept for ten years.
I went for my samples week past thursday and was told the patient records go back 10 yrs not the actual samples."
My point was that, when infected, you may not show any symptoms for up to 10 yrs.
As regards the testing procedures, I'm sure that it can be picked up fairly quickly. I think every 6 months is the usual time between tests ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
Another thought/ question/point for discussion ... Ok, so you get tested once in six months or however often. The result is only accurate up to the day of the original test.
Why are people advertising they are disiease free when this in reality can never be guaranteed... unless of course they never had sex with anybody since their last test... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Another thought/ question/point for discussion ... Ok, so you get tested once in six months or however often. The result is only accurate up to the day of the original test.
Why are people advertising they are disiease free when this in reality can never be guaranteed... unless of course they never had sex with anybody since their last test..."
So true |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think every 6 months is the usual time between tests ?"
There is a 3 month window period from last "encounter" which begs the question when folk get tested have they actually sustained from any encounter for the 3 month window before being tested.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
As a slight aside here, on another thread someone else mentioned scabies. I have had those irksome little critters living in the Temple that I call my body. Have had "Not meeting" on my profile for about 8 months. 6 months of not scratching mean I might consider changing my profile soon |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
"As a slight aside here, on another thread someone else mentioned scabies. I have had those irksome little critters living in the Temple that I call my body. Have had "Not meeting" on my profile for about 8 months. 6 months of not scratching mean I might consider changing my profile soon "
Very responsible and unselfish! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ruitWoman
over a year ago
near kings lynn |
I got ny results back Thursday from the GUM clinic saying I am fine and using condoms every time after that means I will hopefully stay that way.
I only ever have not used condons with a current partner and after seeing each others test results.
Now single again so back to condoms again now xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I wonder if the internet has led to a increase in sexual infections"
more people in their fifties are catching stds because more of them are getting divorced instead of staying married like they used to.
also when they were growing up there werent things like herpes or HIV where as young people are used to using condoms. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
"I wonder if the internet has led to a increase in sexual infections"
I can honestly say I have never used my mouse for anything other than clicking and dragging...perhaps that is why I never caught anything |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I remember a while qago seeing a prgramm about HIV, and people attitude towards it. They inter_iewed several people, one was a woman early twenties, She hated takning her medicine and didn't tell the person who infected her. She added that she wouldn't tell anyone she slept with that she had the virus either. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I wonder if the internet has led to a increase in sexual infections
I can honestly say I have never used my mouse for anything other than clicking and dragging...perhaps that is why I never caught anything"
...... I've caught the occasional viruses and worms.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
"I wonder if the internet has led to a increase in sexual infections
I can honestly say I have never used my mouse for anything other than clicking and dragging...perhaps that is why I never caught anything
...... I've caught the occasional viruses and worms. "
Actually come to think of it... I had a bad cookie or two... had to take time out |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"A report recently published says there are now 96,000 people living with the virus in the UK. That's a full Wembley Stadium, 96,000!!!
Health officials also warned that A QUARTER OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE VIRUS ARE UNAWARE THEY ARE INFECTED!
Unsafe sex was given as the reason for an increase in numbers.
Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
Gay, bi, curious or straight, please don't take any risks. You never fully know if the other person has.
Cover up people!"
Precisely the reason we wont swing anymore  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
"Does anyone have a statistic for people who only have heterosexual sex,where this does not involve anal.
Genuine question,to my shame,I know far to little on this subject."
I don't have a stat for heterosexual vaginal only sex. People often lie about what they do. In heterosexual situations women are more vulnerable than men. Shaving and waxing and eating crisps or other abrasive foods all increase your risk a little. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
"if you have sex with alot of different people the ricks are high ........ there's no getting away from it ."
You increase your risks but I have met young women who became infected on their first sexual encounter. It's rather like pregnancy, the act exposes you the risk the best you can do it mitigate that risk. Given that we on Fab have all made the choice to have sex we are at risk. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago
glasgow |
"Does anyone have a statistic for people who only have heterosexual sex,where this does not involve anal.
Genuine question,to my shame,I know far to little on this subject.
I don't have a stat for heterosexual vaginal only sex. People often lie about what they do. In heterosexual situations women are more vulnerable than men. Shaving and waxing and eating crisps or other abrasive foods all increase your risk a little."
Thank you,there must be a statistic for this some where.
Till I find it,I'll stick to the mars bars,and galaxies. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
"Does anyone have a statistic for people who only have heterosexual sex,where this does not involve anal.
Genuine question,to my shame,I know far to little on this subject.
I don't have a stat for heterosexual vaginal only sex. People often lie about what they do. In heterosexual situations women are more vulnerable than men. Shaving and waxing and eating crisps or other abrasive foods all increase your risk a little.
Thank you,there must be a statistic for this some where.
Till I find it,I'll stick to the mars bars,and galaxies."
It's been a while since I worked in the sexual health world so I don't keep up with the statistics in the same way. I will try and remember to ask next time I see the people still working in that world. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Here are some of the recent statistics:
96,000 people are living with HIV in the UK. 24 per cent of these people are undiagnosed and do not know about their HIV infection. In 2011, 500 people with HIV died. There were 6,280 new diagnoses in 2011. Nearly half (47 per cent) of the of people diagnosed with HIV in 2011 were diagnosed late, after they should have already started treatment. 48 per cent of new HIV diagnoses in 2011 were among men who have sex with men. All data is taken from the Health Protection Agency (HPA).
Sourcr: Terrence Higgins Trust. The National AIDS Trust.... Both show the same statistics.
I'm probably being a bit thick here (not had much sleep and brain not working) but if 24% of the 96,000 people that have HIV don't know they've got HIV how the hell does anyone else know? Did they test them, find it positive then tell them they were ok? I'm confused! Lol x"
That 24% is people who haven't been "tested" for HIV but have had a sample used for part of the national unlinked anonymous testing to give an idea of the prevalence of HIV and what resources need to be devoted to combating it.
Leftover blood from Antenatal and GUM clinic blood tests, when a HIV test hasn't been requested, is anonymised and irreversibly unlinked from the source clinic and is then tested for HIV. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Another thought/ question/point for discussion ... Ok, so you get tested once in six months or however often. The result is only accurate up to the day of the original test.
Why are people advertising they are disiease free when this in reality can never be guaranteed... unless of course they never had sex with anybody since their last test..."
It takes 3 months for some conditions to incubate, including AIDS - so to say you are clean you have to have been tested AND not had sex for 3 months since! You can never say you are truly safe therefore..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Friend of mine.
Worked away slept with a girl. Came home. Within a year he started to get ill. Young family beautiful wife.
Tested for croms and colitice. Went through about two years of being really ill. We almost lost him. Done all the tests. Couldnt find what was up.
Finally his wife demanded that all tests were done. Came back HIV+. Destroyed his life and marriage. Wife divorced him. Luckily she tested negative.
Now with the correct drugs he's living an almost normal life. Back at work and remarried.
Life does go on with HIV but we must practice safe sex with people we do not no properly. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
We will all die, and I have heard the expression, " she was to die for " or " he was to die for".
if you are not in a monogamous relationship your risk of catching a STD or HIV must be sky high, a test is no guarantee that someone is safe, and remember on a swinging site, lots of people have maybe 50 partners in a year, some more some less,
So you are sleeping with many thousand people, just by having sex once a month..scary |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Another thought/ question/point for discussion ... Ok, so you get tested once in six months or however often. The result is only accurate up to the day of the original test.
Why are people advertising they are disiease free when this in reality can never be guaranteed... unless of course they never had sex with anybody since their last test...
It takes 3 months for some conditions to incubate, including AIDS - so to say you are clean you have to have been tested AND not had sex for 3 months since! You can never say you are truly safe therefore....."
Its all very high risk sex with people you don't know and the stories in the Sunday papers about AIDS some are really bad at times its worrying it really is. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Another thought/ question/point for discussion ... Ok, so you get tested once in six months or however often. The result is only accurate up to the day of the original test.
Why are people advertising they are disiease free when this in reality can never be guaranteed... unless of course they never had sex with anybody since their last test...
It takes 3 months for some conditions to incubate, including AIDS - so to say you are clean you have to have been tested AND not had sex for 3 months since! You can never say you are truly safe therefore.....Its all very high risk sex with people you don't know and the stories in the Sunday papers about AIDS some are really bad at times its worrying it really is."
Totally agree. Need to play safe guy's |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A report recently published says there are now 96,000 people living with the virus in the UK. That's a full Wembley Stadium, 96,000!!!
Health officials also warned that A QUARTER OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE VIRUS ARE UNAWARE THEY ARE INFECTED!
Unsafe sex was given as the reason for an increase in numbers.
Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
Gay, bi, curious or straight, please don't take any risks. You never fully know if the other person has.
Cover up people!"
I agree with the sentiment of the post and safe sex is the way to play not just to reduce the risk of HIV and other STIs.
However it must be through knowledge not fear. The 96000 seems massive but is only 1.3% of the total population. A bigger % of the sexually active population. The hard hitting, fear inducing campaign of the 80s did more to harm and cause people to hide and not test than it helped.
Let's be safe but responsibly informed. Suit up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A report recently published says there are now 96,000 people living with the virus in the UK. That's a full Wembley Stadium, 96,000!!!
Health officials also warned that A QUARTER OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE VIRUS ARE UNAWARE THEY ARE INFECTED!
Unsafe sex was given as the reason for an increase in numbers.
Gay and bisexual men diagnosed with the virus hit an all time high. One in 20 men who have sex with men in the UK now had HIV, with the figure soaring to nearly one in 12 in London.
Gay, bi, curious or straight, please don't take any risks. You never fully know if the other person has.
Cover up people!
I agree with the sentiment of the post and safe sex is the way to play not just to reduce the risk of HIV and other STIs.
However it must be through knowledge not fear. The 96000 seems massive but is only 1.3% of the total population. A bigger % of the sexually active population. The hard hitting, fear inducing campaign of the 80s did more to harm and cause people to hide and not test than it helped.
Let's be safe but responsibly informed. Suit up. "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Oh and beware of statistics
For an HIV+ man to be included in the men with men they first have to admit having sex with men. It may well be that these particular figures are skewed. There is no reason why we shouldn't in fact think that group is bigger.
It should be 1 in 20 men who admitted to having sex with a man was + but the total size of the group having m:m sex can only be considerably bigger. Think how many straight guys on here will be situationally bi.
Society still loves to blame a minority. Rarely is attention drawn to the fact that condom usage or non penetrative sex is far more the cultural norm in Gay communities than straight.
Also no mention is made of other routes of infection. Eg used needles.
Don't absorb information, understand it.
Lies, damned lies and statistics. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
I agree with the sentiment of the post and safe sex is the way to play not just to reduce the risk of HIV and other STIs.
However it must be through knowledge not fear. The 96000 seems massive but is only 1.3% of the total population. A bigger % of the sexually active population. The hard hitting, fear inducing campaign of the 80s did more to harm and cause people to hide and not test than it helped.
Let's be safe but responsibly informed. Suit up. "
The current UK population is 63 million. As a function of total population, this means 0.15% of the population.
Let us assume 20% of the population is too young, and a further 20% is not having intercourse. That would then make the percentage 0.25% of what could be _iewed as 60% of the population who are assumed sexually active. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago
glasgow |
"
I agree with the sentiment of the post and safe sex is the way to play not just to reduce the risk of HIV and other STIs.
However it must be through knowledge not fear. The 96000 seems massive but is only 1.3% of the total population. A bigger % of the sexually active population. The hard hitting, fear inducing campaign of the 80s did more to harm and cause people to hide and not test than it helped.
Let's be safe but responsibly informed. Suit up.
The current UK population is 63 million. As a function of total population, this means 0.15% of the population.
Let us assume 20% of the population is too young, and a further 20% is not having intercourse. That would then make the percentage 0.25% of what could be _iewed as 60% of the population who are assumed sexually active. "
Those figures are very likely correct.
Although the alarmist,and liars will work the statistics to suit themselves.
It's important to play safe,but apparently less important to be honest.
People playing with the figures,lose credibility,and are soon seen as a source of misinformation.
organisations such as the Terence Higgins trust,should at the very least be scrupulously honest,instead of giving out information with intention of alarming,and panicking people.
many of whom,are already in a desperate situation. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I am no expert, but people receiving treatment, and others who are hiv positive, may not all be as openly putting it about with others as we may think.
There are trials underway too, where people who are negative are receiving drug treatments, and let's hope that all who have the illness, and future generations, get improvements to their health and eventually we get a cure etc.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ungle-FeverCouple (FF)
over a year ago
Bristol/Gloucester |
"Friend of mine.
Worked away slept with a girl. Came home. Within a year he started to get ill. Young family beautiful wife.
Tested for croms and colitice. Went through about two years of being really ill. We almost lost him. Done all the tests. Couldnt find what was up.
Finally his wife demanded that all tests were done. Came back HIV+. Destroyed his life and marriage. Wife divorced him. Luckily she tested negative.
Now with the correct drugs he's living an almost normal life. Back at work and remarried.
Life does go on with HIV but we must practice safe sex with people we do not no properly."
A close friend of mine is currently in a similar situation... His future isn't looking very bright.
His wife tested negative but is determined to stand by him. Despite being pregnant!
A silly mistake 10+ years ago! one night of passion. Was only diagnosed last week... It's likely it's too late for treatment to have any effect.
Play safe people... It's just not worth it! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
