FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Don't you just hate it when......
Don't you just hate it when......
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Can you remember the main word.....boobs, wearing heels, late night......and type into forum search ?"
Nope
It was as me asking if anyone had ever tried the cam rooms. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
"
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt"
Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they  they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aitonelMan
over a year ago
Liverpool |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt
Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone "
Now where would the fun be in that?
All I have to say to those that dislike Clickbait is Too bad, so sad  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt
Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone "
Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aitonelMan
over a year ago
Liverpool |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
"
All the time! Though I very rarely have need to actually look for them because they are mostly pointless, actually very pointless. And so few respond to them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt
Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone
"
You mean click out of it? It probably makes no odds at the end of the day. It does become force of habit though I think, threading this way.
pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt
Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone
Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset....
"
Just a note to a certain user. I can't block you from the forum so leave off unless you actually have something to say please? Just refer to something (anything, as long as it's there) - ie in future. Honestly, it's in the rules.
pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt"
It's such a pain when you click on a "what chocolate thread" and it turns out someone shit the bed  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt
Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone
Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset....
Just a note to a certain user. I can't block you from the forum so leave off unless you actually have something to say please? Just refer to something (anything, as long as it's there) - ie in future. Honestly, it's in the rules.
pt"
Think he was talking to me pet |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt
Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone
Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset....
Just a note to a certain user. I can't block you from the forum so leave off unless you actually have something to say please? Just refer to something (anything, as long as it's there) - ie in future. Honestly, it's in the rules.
pt
Think he was talking to me pet "
I was talking to you Fluffy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt"
Sorry if I upset you, wasn't my intention.
I'll try think of something much more interesting soon |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt
Sorry if I upset you, wasn't my intention.
I'll try think of something much more interesting soon
"
Comedy threads are always welcome! Interesting is what I don't really want as click bait I guess.
pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You want to look up your own thread and can't remember the sodding title of it?
I know it's a huge pain replying to some OP's when over half the words of their post are in their unseeable title!
Seriously though, people need to cut down on this bate and hook method of titling imo. It's been used for some more serious threads of late, just out of force of habit I think. It can be an accidental wind-up for some fabbers though I feel - not everyone wants to just land in certain subjects.
It can somewhat trivialise threads we intended to be more earnest too I think.
pt
Oh well if they don’t like it they don’t have to click on it do they they could just scroll past instead of getting the arse with everyone
Some Ppl aren't picky about what arses they upset....
Just a note to a certain user. I can't block you from the forum so leave off unless you actually have something to say please? Just refer to something (anything, as long as it's there) - ie in future. Honestly, it's in the rules.
pt
Think he was talking to me pet
I was talking to you Fluffy
"
.
Well that's too 'in' or clever for me then I'm afraid. It felt like I was being called an arse either way as there was only Fluffy and myself in the post. Context, please.
pt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
is it spreading 
