"What film doesn’t need a sequel?
What film didn't need a sequel?
Doesn’t need is the thing
Didn't need highlander "
Ahhh….There is a, The Thing sequel (technically a prequel though) - It’s unsurprisingly, not a patch on Carpenter’s classic but is sort of watchable (although Rob Bottin’s incredible hands on special effects work is predictably replaced with CGI galore) 
Anyhoo….
Doesn’t Require a sequel: Shawshank Redemption
Didn’t require a sequel. John Wick (I’m not a big fan of the sequels)  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Doesn't need a sequel: Taxi Driver. De Niro at one point was very interested in what an older Travis Bickle would be like.
Didn't need a sequel: Starship Troopers |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What film doesn’t need a sequel?
What film didn't need a sequel?
Doesn’t need is the thing
Didn't need highlander "
Doesn’t : A Bridge Too Far
Didn’t : Grease
I actually find most of Grease unwatchable these days but the sequel was never ever, ever watchable  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
