I’m a bit of stats geek love a good stat but for all those women out there who tell you that good looks and bods aren’t the only thing driving them… they may not be telling the truth. Stats are based on the data provided by the person on their profile:
We looked at East Midlands area only and sampled 120 profiles:
Guys with muscles and toned bodies have on average 72.6% more verifications over 10 than those that say “slim or chubby”
Cubby or Dad Bod types generally have less than 10 verifications (81.2% to be precise)
The proportion of white people is 88% compared to 12% black.
“BBW or large bodied” ladies generally have the most fun in the East Midlands with 69% having more than 10 verifications by males.
Couples are far more successful with 79.8% having more than 10 verifications mostly made up of men (51% men 49% women)
In the East Midlands there are fewer women out there than men on average can’t give you the numbers as they are changing daily.
Men who had no profile pictures made up 28% and of them hardly any had more than 3 verifications (only 8% in fact)
Men who had pictures of genitals as their profile - only 9% had more than 5 verifications.
Men who had muscles / chest / leg pictures - 42% had more than 3 verifications
Women who had written a lot on their profiles - 68% had more than 5 verifications
Women who had pictures of their genitalia - 9% had more than 5 verifications
Women who had breasts or half a face - 55% had more than 5 verifications
It is also worth noting that 49% of women’s verification comments came from clubs or webcam meets
Almost 87% of men’s verifications came from verified women with whom they had slept with.
Women had more fantasies than men - 44% listed fantasies on their profile whilst only 5.1% of men had fantasties listed
But by far the Dad bods have to work a lot harder to impress women, the top category were slim women who had - ready for this - an astonishing 79.2% of more than 40 verifications, of which they had slept with on average 27-30 of their verifiers. One lady we sampled had over 136 verfications whilst the maximum for a man was 30. However one man we left out of the sample did have 196 verifications
There you go that was really just for fun reading. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
As you say, OP, interesting reading.
But I don’t believe those stats can be relied upon unless you know for a fact every person was verified after every meet and every person has displayed every verification.
I have met some people multiple times (I mean who wouldn’t meet this again, right?) but only verified after the first meet. I also choose to only have a selection of verifications visible.
It also depends hugely on motivation, activity levels, ability to hold an initial conversation and personality.
I don’t believe this is something about which you can be objective. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Anything about us trans ladies?
I hate to say it but we couldn’t find enough Trans to sample - not in the East Midlands … Sorry! We did look! "
You need to look on fabguys there are loads. I have met a few |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eliWoman
over a year ago
. |
"As you say, OP, interesting reading.
But I don’t believe those stats can be relied upon unless you know for a fact every person was verified after every meet and every person has displayed every verification.
I have met some people multiple times (I mean who wouldn’t meet this again, right?) but only verified after the first meet. I also choose to only have a selection of verifications visible.
It also depends hugely on motivation, activity levels, ability to hold an initial conversation and personality.
I don’t believe this is something about which you can be objective."
Agreed. I mean it's interesting reading but not something that carries any weight. I have far, far more veris than you can read. And zero sex veris.
It's an interesting attempt to quantify something like this - there's some truth to it but it's not going to be carved into stone any time. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
