I was too young to remember sex without the risk of contracting HIV, so wondered if bum-bum sex used to be important, or maybe it’s the internet that promoted the idea, with the amount of porn scenes available containing anal.
Is the reason that anal become more of a requirement because of HIV, & the necessity of sheaths being used to prevent deseases / conditions, so the reduced sensation may only be exchanged for the tightness of an ‘exit-tube’ (or bum-bum)? Any lasses concur? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Not sure if I got the question right so let's clarify... do you mean anal becoming more popular because of the use of condoms reducing sensations during vaginal penetration? You still would use condom for anal to protect yourself anyway, right? The only difference would be that enveloping tightness I guess?
Why do you call it a requirement?
T |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Reduction in sensation requires the ‘Poop-Shute’ to be employed for increased pleasure (from males perspective anyway).
I would ALWAYS choose a condom with a new partner UNTIL I see her sexual report from a sex clinic.
I’ve seen many ads displaying a no-condom policy - with gang-bangs too! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Jesus ........ Christ.
Not sure, but I think he disapproved of back door lovin'"
I know there was something in the Hebrew scriptures about lying with a man as with a woman.
I suppose you'd have to know what ancient Israelite same sex acts were to be able to comment on anal sex specifically |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Jesus ........ Christ.
Not sure, but I think he disapproved of back door lovin'
I know there was something in the Hebrew scriptures about lying with a man as with a woman.
I suppose you'd have to know what ancient Israelite same sex acts were to be able to comment on anal sex specifically "
This is all a misunderstanding based upon translation error. Mixing up lying as in to be laid down, and lying as in to tell untruths.
The intended meaning of the passage in question, translated to a modern vernacular, should be more like "Hey bro, bro's should never lie to bro's, even if bro's lie to women all the time. It's the bro's code."
Men should not lie to men in the same way that men will lie to women. Especially if it's about sex. You can tell your woman anything to get her knickers off, but the guys down the pub need to know the real story...
Nothing to do with having a bit of bumbum on the quiet when there's nothing else on offer  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
Px 
