FabSwingers.com > Forums > Ireland > Men will ride anything?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that." its absolute horseshite mostly. men will do the casual sex part alot more than women but most won't jump up on anything. they might if frozzled from beer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride on a tractor " me u tractor trailer. Great experience that would be | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pete Pete Pete. C'mon man. The minute that first text is sent the guy on the other end is thinking of the boom boom room. Why else would a bloke on Fab initiate? Unless it's a private message to do with a forum topic or the like. If its a random hi to start a convo the end goal is the no pants dance surely. I'm not having I just want to say hi for hi's sake" Ah now, if that's your intention, g'luck | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that.its absolute horseshite mostly. men will do the casual sex part alot more than women but most won't jump up on anything. they might if frozzled from beer." I agreed with you at first but then I thought well then who are the men sleeping with??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride on a tractor " Did you ever get your hole, did you ever get your hole, did you ever get your whole weeks wages | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride on a tractor " Thanks Belle...that'll be in my head in the shower in the morning now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride on a tractor Did you ever get your hole, did you ever get your hole, did you ever get your whole weeks wages " Did you ever get the feel, ever get the feel, ever get the feel of a fiver? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride on a tractor Did you ever get your hole, did you ever get your hole, did you ever get your whole weeks wages Did you ever get the feel, ever get the feel, ever get the feel of a fiver?" Ah, FFS, I don't even know the song and I'm singing it in my head - get out! I'm sorry I ventured back in here now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that.its absolute horseshite mostly. men will do the casual sex part alot more than women but most won't jump up on anything. they might if frozzled from beer. I agreed with you at first but then I thought well then who are the men sleeping with??? " in general men sleep with women they're attracted 2. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride on a tractor Thanks Belle...that'll be in my head in the shower in the morning now " Sorry BM | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that." op great tread hate that word too off course women will only choose who they want to ride!! Hate that word I’m a love making man might I also point out I’m here since 2019 and still haven’t got the ride!! You fabbers work that out,I’ve made many attempts to write good message to women mentioning stuff in there bio saying stuff I seen and liked on there profile but to be honest it’s ratio women to men far to many men!! And it’s very hard to stand out regardless of effort or how selective you are,I’m not here to sleep with lots of women!! I know lots of ppl say that but for me it’s true!! I’m looking for connection passionate kissing fun adventure etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that." What about the messages that explicitly ask you to ride them, straight off the bat, no conversation or pics exchanged whatsoever? Can we take that as an indication that they'd ride anything or is it some sort of trick? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that." Well here's my opinion on my own actions here regards this topic through the points mentioned in the opening post I do think women are selective , so are men . I dont think men will ride " anyone " l certainly wouldnt, but l did have a long discussion on this point with a lady from fab as the story goes.." once upon a time...."..which she insisted men would which of course l had to defend the mens corner and say they wouldnt. Yes l would agree if a lady gets any message from a guy here she thinks it means the guy is interested in fucking her, why would he write in the first place BUT if its a PM to a point made on the forum it may well be only a compliment or an agreement on what she posted, yes l have often complimented a lady on her reply or comment with NO other hidden agenda only to compliment her. And as regards the last point , l do think men know a lot about SOME women here before they write, l say SOME because they have photos up, they say exactly what they're interested in and what they're not interested in on their profile unlike others who have pure blank profiles with no photo or any written profile only the good ol' " face pic in 1st message or instant block " ..which in turn means a " go fuck yourself " thought from me,..these type want Jam on both sides . So to sum it up on my thoughts here ,l would'nt just " ride " anyone here simply because l look for a mental connection first and not all ladies here are my " type " as in the same way lm not the type some or a lot of ladies here look for either which also proves ladies here wont just " ride " anyone either. Its a jungle here , there are all types moving through it,have fun on your adventures exploring it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's also the proclaimed virtuous-promiscuous, those who are 'not here to shag the whole site'. Wouldn't loose my mind over it just shows that sexual liberation hasn't arrived yet respectively openmindedness is bit limited. Or why would you feel the need to express explicity your 'betterness'? " You'll have to translate that into manspeak for me. I'm not sure if you're being nice to me there or not lol. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that. What about the messages that explicitly ask you to ride them, straight off the bat, no conversation or pics exchanged whatsoever? Can we take that as an indication that they'd ride anything or is it some sort of trick? " Most definitely you can as far as I am concerned but can you also take it as evidence that all man are like that? I'm not going to judge those guys. They will maybe find the right dance partner but I doubt I would make the same choice they would. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been called a timewaster for a simple no thanks reply " you just cant win here " No thanks? But what was the question? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride on a tractor " No but I did on a Honda 50. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some will, some won't Some will when wearing beergoggles Same could be said of women too" Which women? DM me their numbers please | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some will, some won't Some will when wearing beergoggles Same could be said of women too Which women? DM me their numbers please " Me Mick And you have my number | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some will, some won't Some will when wearing beergoggles Same could be said of women too" Blood can sometimes flow from the brain to the cock through alcoholic influence.. I always remember that song.. "I never went to bed with an ugly woman - but I sure woke up with a few" substitute men for women in the song and same applies for girls | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some will, some won't Some will when wearing beergoggles Same could be said of women too Which women? DM me their numbers please Me Mick And you have my number " Mother of God! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride on a tractor " Did you ever get a feel, did you ever get a feel, did you ever get a feel of a fiver | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some will, some won't Some will when wearing beergoggles Same could be said of women too Which women? DM me their numbers please Me Mick And you have my number Mother of God! " Noooo that's not me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some will, some won't Some will when wearing beergoggles Same could be said of women too Which women? DM me their numbers please Me Mick And you have my number Mother of God! Noooo that's not me " *searches phone frantically, looking for mysterious number | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that." Very well said. After my separation, the last thing I wanted to do was hook up and now I am back open for business I am more selective than I ever thought I would be. I don't even get affected by the knock backs or them attitudes you speak of. Its very much each to their own. I've just come on the forums and had a laugh with no expectations and the couple of women I have got talking to are class. Easy peasy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some will, some won't Some will when wearing beergoggles Same could be said of women too Which women? DM me their numbers please Me Mick And you have my number Mother of God! Noooo that's not me *searches phone frantically, looking for mysterious number " You better find that number Mick And share it with me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that. What about the messages that explicitly ask you to ride them, straight off the bat, no conversation or pics exchanged whatsoever? Can we take that as an indication that they'd ride anything or is it some sort of trick? " ^^^^^^^ This Exactly. When I first joined & had zero photos on my profile, no veris etc... The amount of mail I was receiving was unreal...a little fked up tbh. My profile was totally blank & some lads were asking `wanna fk now` Very Strange. Also a guy told me yesterday he would fk anything he's that horny. Very True, & he was serious Another Straight Guy told me he was that horny he fked a guy. My reply to that was... So you're obviously Bi... He was adamant that no he wasn't Bi, He's straight... To all Men, Please do not misinterpret what I am saying here... I am not saying All Men are like this (as in they would fk anything)...But there are the few. I'm well aware alot of men are very select on who they also. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that. What about the messages that explicitly ask you to ride them, straight off the bat, no conversation or pics exchanged whatsoever? Can we take that as an indication that they'd ride anything or is it some sort of trick? ^^^^^^^ This Exactly. When I first joined & had zero photos on my profile, no veris etc... The amount of mail I was receiving was unreal...a little fked up tbh. My profile was totally blank & some lads were asking `wanna fk now` Very Strange. Also a guy told me yesterday he would fk anything he's that horny. Very True, & he was serious Another Straight Guy told me he was that horny he fked a guy. My reply to that was... So you're obviously Bi... He was adamant that no he wasn't Bi, He's straight... To all Men, Please do not misinterpret what I am saying here... I am not saying All Men are like this (as in they would fk anything)...But there are the few. I'm well aware alot of men are very select on who they also. " *Select on who they meet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd ride anything I get my hands on ??" ^^^^^^^ There's the spoof...I mean proof Another guy who`d apparently "ride anything" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that. What about the messages that explicitly ask you to ride them, straight off the bat, no conversation or pics exchanged whatsoever? Can we take that as an indication that they'd ride anything or is it some sort of trick? Most definitely you can as far as I am concerned but can you also take it as evidence that all man are like that? I'm not going to judge those guys. They will maybe find the right dance partner but I doubt I would make the same choice they would." No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that." Shur look it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's also the proclaimed virtuous-promiscuous, those who are 'not here to shag the whole site'. Wouldn't loose my mind over it just shows that sexual liberation hasn't arrived yet respectively openmindedness is bit limited. Or why would you feel the need to express explicity your 'betterness'? You'll have to translate that into manspeak for me. I'm not sure if you're being nice to me there or not lol. " What I'm saying is I've no doubt that men can be as selective and picky as women. But why do we even have to defend the scale of our promiscuity in the first place? Why can we not just live out our sexual life without being put on a scale of sluttyness? Does it really matter how generously we enjoy sex with different partners or not? It all goes back to the ingrained belief of promiscuity is shameful, scandalous, evil etc. Besides that the statement that the statement 'men would ride anything' is a double judgement not only on men but also on women, it implies that there's women that are no good or lesser for whatever reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's also the proclaimed virtuous-promiscuous, those who are 'not here to shag the whole site'. Wouldn't loose my mind over it just shows that sexual liberation hasn't arrived yet respectively openmindedness is bit limited. Or why would you feel the need to express explicity your 'betterness'? You'll have to translate that into manspeak for me. I'm not sure if you're being nice to me there or not lol. What I'm saying is I've no doubt that men can be as selective and picky as women. But why do we even have to defend the scale of our promiscuity in the first place? Why can we not just live out our sexual life without being put on a scale of sluttyness? Does it really matter how generously we enjoy sex with different partners or not? It all goes back to the ingrained belief of promiscuity is shameful, scandalous, evil etc. Besides that the statement that the statement 'men would ride anything' is a double judgement not only on men but also on women, it implies that there's women that are no good or lesser for whatever reason. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd ride anything I get my hands on ??" I can keep my hands off if it increases the chances of a riiiide! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. " Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one)" Exactly this. I agree with another earlier poster as well that even those messages aren't a guarantee (because a lot of people are all talk and won't end up meeting)... But to say that women get the impression that men aren't selective because they have said hello is just false. We get that impression because men give that impression explicitly in their messages. Once again, women being blamed for their experience rather than men being blamed for their behaviour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"While there is some men like women that like to chat and get to know soneone before they decide on the fun factor There is a hell of a lot that use the site as dial a ride." Exactly my point. It just seems that so many ladies on here tar all men with the same brush. We aren't all that way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that. What about the messages that explicitly ask you to ride them, straight off the bat, no conversation or pics exchanged whatsoever? Can we take that as an indication that they'd ride anything or is it some sort of trick? ^^^^^^^ This Exactly. When I first joined & had zero photos on my profile, no veris etc... The amount of mail I was receiving was unreal...a little fked up tbh. My profile was totally blank & some lads were asking `wanna fk now` Very Strange. Also a guy told me yesterday he would fk anything he's that horny. Very True, & he was serious Another Straight Guy told me he was that horny he fked a guy. My reply to that was... So you're obviously Bi... He was adamant that no he wasn't Bi, He's straight... To all Men, Please do not misinterpret what I am saying here... I am not saying All Men are like this (as in they would fk anything)...But there are the few. I'm well aware alot of men are very select on who they also. " Thank you for understanding what I'm trying to say here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one) Exactly this. I agree with another earlier poster as well that even those messages aren't a guarantee (because a lot of people are all talk and won't end up meeting)... But to say that women get the impression that men aren't selective because they have said hello is just false. We get that impression because men give that impression explicitly in their messages. Once again, women being blamed for their experience rather than men being blamed for their behaviour. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one) Exactly this. I agree with another earlier poster as well that even those messages aren't a guarantee (because a lot of people are all talk and won't end up meeting)... But to say that women get the impression that men aren't selective because they have said hello is just false. We get that impression because men give that impression explicitly in their messages. Once again, women being blamed for their experience rather than men being blamed for their behaviour. " Well I sent you a very polite, respectful message a while back just basically saying hi, not asking for anything in particular. Did you assume I wanted to shag you? Do you assume every man who messages you wants to do the naked tango with you immediately? Of course if a man messages you, he has seen something he likes in your profile. If your lucky, he has read something too. The initial contact is just nod across the bar type thing to many men though. He could just be saying I'm here and I'd be honoured if you'd take the time to talk with me to see if you might like me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just wondering how men would react if the shoe was on the other foot and they were getting 2/300 messages a day from women. Wonder if they'd raise their expectations and shorten their attention span with all those messages. Betcha we would !! " I think the most noticeable thing would be a quadrupling of Pfizer's profits! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just wondering how men would react if the shoe was on the other foot and they were getting 2/300 messages a day from women. Wonder if they'd raise their expectations and shorten their attention span with all those messages. Betcha we would !! I think the most noticeable thing would be a quadrupling of Pfizer's profits! " Very true | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one) Exactly this. I agree with another earlier poster as well that even those messages aren't a guarantee (because a lot of people are all talk and won't end up meeting)... But to say that women get the impression that men aren't selective because they have said hello is just false. We get that impression because men give that impression explicitly in their messages. Once again, women being blamed for their experience rather than men being blamed for their behaviour. Well I sent you a very polite, respectful message a while back just basically saying hi, not asking for anything in particular. Did you assume I wanted to shag you? Do you assume every man who messages you wants to do the naked tango with you immediately? Of course if a man messages you, he has seen something he likes in your profile. If your lucky, he has read something too. The initial contact is just nod across the bar type thing to many men though. He could just be saying I'm here and I'd be honoured if you'd take the time to talk with me to see if you might like me. " No I didn't. Just as an FYI... it's 2pm. I have my filters at MAX MAX MAX capacity - no newbies, nobody without pics, site supporters only etc etc - and I have received, so far today, five first messages (ie have never messaged me before) asking directly if I want to meet. Without any other conversation or seeing a pic or anything. I've been up since 10am so that's one per hour. We're not presuming anything or making shit up. We're reading the messages in our inboxes with our eyeballs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Well I sent you a very polite, respectful message a while back just basically saying hi, not asking for anything in particular. Did you assume I wanted to shag you? Do you assume every man who messages you wants to do the naked tango with you immediately? Of course if a man messages you, he has seen something he likes in your profile. If your lucky, he has read something too. The initial contact is just nod across the bar type thing to many men though. He could just be saying I'm here and I'd be honoured if you'd take the time to talk with me to see if you might like me. " Women in this thread (including the poster you were responding to) have explicitly said: - Not all men - It's not the polite hello messages that give the impression you speak of - some women are just as unselective as some men If you think that women who explicitly state their preferences, boundaries & limits on their profiles are "dumb", "silly" & "presumptuous", maybe you should avoid them. Exercise YOUR preferences, boundaries & limits. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Speaking for all men... Yes. Yes they will." You certainly are not speaking for all men so absolutely not.when it comes to being fussy I'm as picky as most of the lady's here are with men. I could put down on our profile my likes and dislikes like some lady's do but I think thats a little unfair . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem with all of this is that people generalise too much. All men are this and all women are that. Humans don't fit into such general categorisations easily. Not all men are the same. Not all women are the same. Having said all that, I still believe, and this is coming from someone who is reasonably selective, that men in general are less selective than women in general. That may just be nature. Mostly in nature males go out with their seed and lash it into whomsoever will accept it. Females on the other hand, will select the male they think is best suited for prolonging the species. Personally I'm quite selective about who I talk to and who I'd meet/ride. God I love the word "ride". I do know though that I'd still ride someone that I wouldn't be prepared to sit and have a coffee with. I'm putting that down to biology but maybe it's just me? " Mickey loves the ride | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride, did ya ever get a ride on a tractor " Did you ever get your hole, did you ever get your hole, did ever get your whole weeks wages | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem with all of this is that people generalise too much. All men are this and all women are that. Humans don't fit into such general categorisations easily. Not all men are the same. Not all women are the same. Having said all that, I still believe, and this is coming from someone who is reasonably selective, that men in general are less selective than women in general. That may just be nature. Mostly in nature males go out with their seed and lash it into whomsoever will accept it. Females on the other hand, will select the male they think is best suited for prolonging the species. Personally I'm quite selective about who I talk to and who I'd meet/ride. God I love the word "ride". I do know though that I'd still ride someone that I wouldn't be prepared to sit and have a coffee with. I'm putting that down to biology but maybe it's just me? Mickey loves the ride " Jaysus, I loves riiiidin! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one)" With regards to your last paragraph - I'm sure there are those men who send out volumes of first messages, just like I'm sure there are those men who are selective in the profiles they approach. I know that there can be a gem behind the blandest, most anonymous profile, I'm sure this applies for both women and men. I do also often wonder how this site would work if the ratio of m:f was reversed? Those women who are more discerning now, with the ratio in their favour, in the profiles they choose to connect/speak with, would they "lower" those standards, for want of a better word, in order to take a chance on a profile, one they wouldn't take a chance on under current circumstances? Would they be more inclined to be the first to message and go on the hunt to be pro-active? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one) With regards to your last paragraph - I'm sure there are those men who send out volumes of first messages, just like I'm sure there are those men who are selective in the profiles they approach. I know that there can be a gem behind the blandest, most anonymous profile, I'm sure this applies for both women and men. I do also often wonder how this site would work if the ratio of m:f was reversed? Those women who are more discerning now, with the ratio in their favour, in the profiles they choose to connect/speak with, would they "lower" those standards, for want of a better word, in order to take a chance on a profile, one they wouldn't take a chance on under current circumstances? Would they be more inclined to be the first to message and go on the hunt to be pro-active?" I believe they would on all counts Without offending anyone the ratio balance has allowed a "higher" standard of guy to be the norm for the ladies of fab. I don't have an issue with this its simply down to supply and demand. Equally the same would occur if the roles were reversed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem with all of this is that people generalise too much. All men are this and all women are that. Humans don't fit into such general categorisations easily. Not all men are the same. Not all women are the same. Having said all that, I still believe, and this is coming from someone who is reasonably selective, that men in general are less selective than women in general. That may just be nature. Mostly in nature males go out with their seed and lash it into whomsoever will accept it. Females on the other hand, will select the male they think is best suited for prolonging the species. Personally I'm quite selective about who I talk to and who I'd meet/ride. God I love the word "ride". I do know though that I'd still ride someone that I wouldn't be prepared to sit and have a coffee with. I'm putting that down to biology but maybe it's just me? " Well said Mick (the answer is still no) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I do also often wonder how this site would work if the ratio of m:f was reversed? Those women who are more discerning now, with the ratio in their favour, in the profiles they choose to connect/speak with, would they "lower" those standards, for want of a better word, in order to take a chance on a profile, one they wouldn't take a chance on under current circumstances? Would they be more inclined to be the first to message and go on the hunt to be pro-active?" I don't actually think it would make a lot of difference to me.Yes it would be harder to get meets if I was looking for them but I don't think what I am looking for would change or I'd 'lower' my standards .I don't see any point in doing that because you would always feel like you had and that wouldn't be fair on the other person involved. I have made first contact on here a few times and it doesn't bother me to do so. What's the worst that can happen I get ignored,blocked or told no .It's not the end of the world. It has made me realise tho how hard it can be to write a first message as well . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem with all of this is that people generalise too much. All men are this and all women are that. Humans don't fit into such general categorisations easily. Not all men are the same. Not all women are the same. Having said all that, I still believe, and this is coming from someone who is reasonably selective, that men in general are less selective than women in general. That may just be nature. Mostly in nature males go out with their seed and lash it into whomsoever will accept it. Females on the other hand, will select the male they think is best suited for prolonging the species. Personally I'm quite selective about who I talk to and who I'd meet/ride. God I love the word "ride". I do know though that I'd still ride someone that I wouldn't be prepared to sit and have a coffee with. I'm putting that down to biology but maybe it's just me? Well said Mick (the answer is still no)" Ah heeeere... Just bend over, will ya ffs! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" With regards to your last paragraph - I'm sure there are those men who send out volumes of first messages, just like I'm sure there are those men who are selective in the profiles they approach. I know that there can be a gem behind the blandest, most anonymous profile, I'm sure this applies for both women and men. I do also often wonder how this site would work if the ratio of m:f was reversed? Those women who are more discerning now, with the ratio in their favour, in the profiles they choose to connect/speak with, would they "lower" those standards, for want of a better word, in order to take a chance on a profile, one they wouldn't take a chance on under current circumstances? Would they be more inclined to be the first to message and go on the hunt to be pro-active?" I did say many, not all And I agree with you that some bland profiles hide absolute diamonds I suspect you'd be right if the ratio was reversed, in that more women might be more pro-active & initiate contact with people that interest them. I think it's what women should be doing anyway. I know I actively look & message first, but only when my interest is piqued & I think there might be compatibility. Sometimes I message just to follow up a forum discussion or let them know I found something funny/interesting on their profile with no interest in anything more. Would I lower my standards if the ratio was reversed? The bar is pretty fucking low as it is, so I don't know that I would. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one) With regards to your last paragraph - I'm sure there are those men who send out volumes of first messages, just like I'm sure there are those men who are selective in the profiles they approach. I know that there can be a gem behind the blandest, most anonymous profile, I'm sure this applies for both women and men. I do also often wonder how this site would work if the ratio of m:f was reversed? Those women who are more discerning now, with the ratio in their favour, in the profiles they choose to connect/speak with, would they "lower" those standards, for want of a better word, in order to take a chance on a profile, one they wouldn't take a chance on under current circumstances? Would they be more inclined to be the first to message and go on the hunt to be pro-active?" I don’t think that would be the case unless you number one concern was your meets appearance. If your criteria for meeting someone is based around clicking with their personality then it doesn’t matter if the ratio is 1:1, 20:1 or 2000:1 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd get up on a cracked plate but I do like a bit of a pattern " Im still waiting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one) With regards to your last paragraph - I'm sure there are those men who send out volumes of first messages, just like I'm sure there are those men who are selective in the profiles they approach. I know that there can be a gem behind the blandest, most anonymous profile, I'm sure this applies for both women and men. I do also often wonder how this site would work if the ratio of m:f was reversed? Those women who are more discerning now, with the ratio in their favour, in the profiles they choose to connect/speak with, would they "lower" those standards, for want of a better word, in order to take a chance on a profile, one they wouldn't take a chance on under current circumstances? Would they be more inclined to be the first to message and go on the hunt to be pro-active? I don’t think that would be the case unless you number one concern was your meets appearance. If your criteria for meeting someone is based around clicking with their personality then it doesn’t matter if the ratio is 1:1, 20:1 or 2000:1" But Jaffa, appearance seems to be absolutely no1 based on bio demands and stated preferences. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd get up on a cracked plate but I do like a bit of a pattern " haha that made me laugh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...I'm horny, who wants to ride me?" Meeeeeeeeee!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...I'm horny, who wants to ride me?" Me, me, me! Mind you, that depends on which of you it is. Still, I'd nearly ride Lee just to get close to herself! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...I'm horny, who wants to ride me? Me, me, me! Mind you, that depends on which of you it is. Still, I'd nearly ride Lee just to get close to herself! " You're on to me Mick! I'll pass on the offer, thanks. I guess the comment was a bit too forward... maybe too obvious. Lee | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" With regards to your last paragraph - I'm sure there are those men who send out volumes of first messages, just like I'm sure there are those men who are selective in the profiles they approach. I know that there can be a gem behind the blandest, most anonymous profile, I'm sure this applies for both women and men. I do also often wonder how this site would work if the ratio of m:f was reversed? Those women who are more discerning now, with the ratio in their favour, in the profiles they choose to connect/speak with, would they "lower" those standards, for want of a better word, in order to take a chance on a profile, one they wouldn't take a chance on under current circumstances? Would they be more inclined to be the first to message and go on the hunt to be pro-active? I did say many, not all And I agree with you that some bland profiles hide absolute diamonds I suspect you'd be right if the ratio was reversed, in that more women might be more pro-active & initiate contact with people that interest them. I think it's what women should be doing anyway. I know I actively look & message first, but only when my interest is piqued & I think there might be compatibility. Sometimes I message just to follow up a forum discussion or let them know I found something funny/interesting on their profile with no interest in anything more. Would I lower my standards if the ratio was reversed? The bar is pretty fucking low as it is, so I don't know that I would. " I didn't mean to imply that you said all. I meant to confirm that there are both types . I personally have also been proactive. I'm perfectly happy sending out an introductory message to a profile to find out if there's potential behind it. Got a couple of great socials and meets out of it too . I do however believe that I personally might put in more work and might approach profiles which don't give away as much if the ratio was reversed. Not because I'm desperate but because I'd be trying to up the chances of success in finding a compatible social/meet. Would I lower my standards? I'm attracted who I'm attracted to. I still won't have sex with someone who doesn't do it for me - but the initial "courting" on this platform would look different, that's for sure! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one) With regards to your last paragraph - I'm sure there are those men who send out volumes of first messages, just like I'm sure there are those men who are selective in the profiles they approach. I know that there can be a gem behind the blandest, most anonymous profile, I'm sure this applies for both women and men. I do also often wonder how this site would work if the ratio of m:f was reversed? Those women who are more discerning now, with the ratio in their favour, in the profiles they choose to connect/speak with, would they "lower" those standards, for want of a better word, in order to take a chance on a profile, one they wouldn't take a chance on under current circumstances? Would they be more inclined to be the first to message and go on the hunt to be pro-active? I don’t think that would be the case unless you number one concern was your meets appearance. If your criteria for meeting someone is based around clicking with their personality then it doesn’t matter if the ratio is 1:1, 20:1 or 2000:1 But Jaffa, appearance seems to be absolutely no1 based on bio demands and stated preferences. " Maybe for some people but definitely not for me or a lot of people I know. Obviously there needs to be some sort of attraction but personality is key for me anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No but I don't think all men are like that. Nor do I think that women are presuming any man who says hello would definitely 100% ride them. Your premise that the idea comes from simple hello messages is wrong. Exactly, the hi, how are you messages aren't what give people the impression you mention. It's the "DTF", "I'm horny & nearby", "I'll be in *your location* tonight, fancy a fuck?", "Would you peg me?", first messages that perpetuate the stereotype. (All examples from my inbox yesterday) Having said that I'm fairly confident that most guys playing the numbers game with copy paste spam - whether it's explicit or more polite, will filter if they get a response. I think it seems that guys are less selective because many will send out large volumes of first messages & will filter after, whereas I think women apply more filters prior to sending a first message (or responding to one) Exactly this. I agree with another earlier poster as well that even those messages aren't a guarantee (because a lot of people are all talk and won't end up meeting)... But to say that women get the impression that men aren't selective because they have said hello is just false. We get that impression because men give that impression explicitly in their messages. Once again, women being blamed for their experience rather than men being blamed for their behaviour. Well I sent you a very polite, respectful message a while back just basically saying hi, not asking for anything in particular. Did you assume I wanted to shag you? Do you assume every man who messages you wants to do the naked tango with you immediately? Of course if a man messages you, he has seen something he likes in your profile. If your lucky, he has read something too. The initial contact is just nod across the bar type thing to many men though. He could just be saying I'm here and I'd be honoured if you'd take the time to talk with me to see if you might like me. No I didn't. Just as an FYI... it's 2pm. I have my filters at MAX MAX MAX capacity - no newbies, nobody without pics, site supporters only etc etc - and I have received, so far today, five first messages (ie have never messaged me before) asking directly if I want to meet. Without any other conversation or seeing a pic or anything. I've been up since 10am so that's one per hour. We're not presuming anything or making shit up. We're reading the messages in our inboxes with our eyeballs. " It wasn't today. It was a while back. Its irrelevant to this thread anyway I guess but I did. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Well I sent you a very polite, respectful message a while back just basically saying hi, not asking for anything in particular. Did you assume I wanted to shag you? Do you assume every man who messages you wants to do the naked tango with you immediately? Of course if a man messages you, he has seen something he likes in your profile. If your lucky, he has read something too. The initial contact is just nod across the bar type thing to many men though. He could just be saying I'm here and I'd be honoured if you'd take the time to talk with me to see if you might like me. Women in this thread (including the poster you were responding to) have explicitly said: - Not all men - It's not the polite hello messages that give the impression you speak of - some women are just as unselective as some men If you think that women who explicitly state their preferences, boundaries & limits on their profiles are "dumb", "silly" & "presumptuous", maybe you should avoid them. Exercise YOUR preferences, boundaries & limits. " I never said or thought that anyone was dumb or silly. Its how they make generalisations that I'm talking about. If anything I've said has caused you offense then read it again and try to give the benefit if the doubt. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Speaking for all men... Yes. Yes they will. You certainly are not speaking for all men so absolutely not.when it comes to being fussy I'm as picky as most of the lady's here are with men. I could put down on our profile my likes and dislikes like some lady's do but I think thats a little unfair . " BRAVO! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd get up on a cracked plate but I do like a bit of a pattern Im still waiting " Maybe your plate has the wrong type of crack for him, lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. " Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. " Over a year on here isnt really new to the place | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk )" To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Over a year on here isnt really new to the place " Well spotted! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages." Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think ride is a great word. " Here here, after some of the comments I might start the RPS.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't believe most guys on here will shag just anyone. I do think quite a few send messages when they are horny and it can come across that they will .But when it comes down to meeting they actually wouldn't. I'm sure most people on here have gotten the" hi I'm horny are you "message at some point. Those messages and guys are easy to ignore. Everyone is on here for their own reason and yes some want just sex and it doesn't matter what the other person is like as it's just sex to them. There are some women who want this also it's not just men and that's fine the site caters for them just as much as it does for people who want to get to know someone first before they meet. But no I don't believe the majority of men will shag just anyone. Saying that they will is just the typical put down line some use on here the same as when the line every woman on here has an ego and wouldn't get a second look outside of fab is used. Everyone should just look for whatever they want from fab and concentrate on their own journey rather than what others are doing. " Absolutely Bo.. completely agree.. especially with the last bit their own journey should be the priority.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I never said or thought that anyone was dumb or silly. Its how they make generalisations that I'm talking about. If anything I've said has caused you offense then read it again and try to give the benefit if the doubt." No offence taken here. I'll admit that you said the attitude was dumb & silly in your OP, not the people, & asked if other men agreed with you. A lot of people are providing context for why some women might make those statements. To paraphrase another poster- everyone has their own way of using this site & their own expectations. Curate your experience to maximise your enjoyment through your own behaviour because you can't control anyone else's actions on here. If you don't like the attitudes of some women then pass them by. They likely won't be compatible with you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two " I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background?" Oh, maybe we can do swapsies | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies " Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! " Would a sheep do instead | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! " Oddly, the guys who send them unsolicited really don't appreciate them reciprocated | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! " don't tempt me Michael | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! don't tempt me Michael" Surley Michael's goal in life is to tempt you, L | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! Would a sheep do instead " Not a problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! don't tempt me Michael" I'd be more forgiving if I was sure it wasn't your own cock at least | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! Would a sheep do instead " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! Oddly, the guys who send them unsolicited really don't appreciate them reciprocated " In one way I don't mind. The benefit from it is that at least you then know the women who have cocks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've read more than one lady's profile that puts out the idea that women are super selective and only "ride" who they want to ride (I actually hate that word lol) but men will ride anyone. I find this a little silly and presumptive. Do any other guys out there think that attitude is dumb? I don't think a guy is necessarily any less selective than a woman. The problem is that the onus is on the man to initiate contact and generally the lady thinks this means he wants to shag her. Ladies, he knows nothing about who you are at that stage so please don't take a simple hello type message as any more than that." I wouldn't agree. I wouldn't just ride anyone. There has to be attraction and most of all a sense of humour for me. For all these guys that just go out to ride a woman mean there is a willing female participant which means the same could apply to woman but I wouldn't tar all woman with the same brush and neither should women tar all men with the same brush. Each too their own. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't believe most guys on here will shag just anyone. I do think quite a few send messages when they are horny and it can come across that they will .But when it comes down to meeting they actually wouldn't. I'm sure most people on here have gotten the" hi I'm horny are you "message at some point. Those messages and guys are easy to ignore. Everyone is on here for their own reason and yes some want just sex and it doesn't matter what the other person is like as it's just sex to them. There are some women who want this also it's not just men and that's fine the site caters for them just as much as it does for people who want to get to know someone first before they meet. But no I don't believe the majority of men will shag just anyone. Saying that they will is just the typical put down line some use on here the same as when the line every woman on here has an ego and wouldn't get a second look outside of fab is used. Everyone should just look for whatever they want from fab and concentrate on their own journey rather than what others are doing. " Well said _ustbo | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well Ladies, I guess I'm the only one. I will ride just about anything, so please take a ticket and I'll get to you as soon as I can " Ah I'm off at the back of the line dammit.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Just send loads of copy and paste messages to all the women, men and couples you can muster with "fancy a riiiide?" Someone's bound to get back to you Report back here, please (No, you're not part of a social experiment. Partake at your own risk ) To forgot to mention he should attach cock pics from countless different angles, to the copy and paste messages. Ah flip!!! I really did - and I'm sure there's loads still missing those extra to finish wallpapering a room or two I got some spare if you need to finish a room off - do you want dirty clothes on the floor or urinals in the background? Oh, maybe we can do swapsies Well I for one would never appreciate a lady sending me a cock pic! Oddly, the guys who send them unsolicited really don't appreciate them reciprocated " Have done this several times from couple profile in response to unsolicited pics. When they ask me why I'm sending a cock pic my response is "Well you sent me one of yours so I thought I would send one of mine". Then they say they are not gay and I tell them neither am I. The conversations usually don't end so well. *Shrugs* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"want to try a shag more married woman if any on here " Thanks for the input to the thread banger. That was very insightful. I'm sure the married ladies will be lining up at your door now, with their panties around their ankles | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't believe most guys on here will shag just anyone. I do think quite a few send messages when they are horny and it can come across that they will .But when it comes down to meeting they actually wouldn't. I'm sure most people on here have gotten the" hi I'm horny are you "message at some point. Those messages and guys are easy to ignore. Everyone is on here for their own reason and yes some want just sex and it doesn't matter what the other person is like as it's just sex to them. There are some women who want this also it's not just men and that's fine the site caters for them just as much as it does for people who want to get to know someone first before they meet. But no I don't believe the majority of men will shag just anyone. Saying that they will is just the typical put down line some use on here the same as when the line every woman on here has an ego and wouldn't get a second look outside of fab is used. Everyone should just look for whatever they want from fab and concentrate on their own journey rather than what others are doing. Well said _ustbo" I agree with everything you said Don. I will not shag any woman given the opportunity. It's not a case of having standards, I have preferences, just the same as the majority of women on fab do. It comes down to personal choice as I know that I am not every females cup of tea and I respect that. At the same time not every female on fab is what I'm looking for. The men who would shag any woman for the sake of a quickie shouldn't tar every woman on fab with the same brush and the same applies to the ladies too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well Ladies, I guess I'm the only one. I will ride just about anything, so please take a ticket and I'll get to you as soon as I can Ah I'm off at the back of the line dammit.." I can't imagine anyone not having you in their preferences lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pete Pete Pete. C'mon man. The minute that first text is sent the guy on the other end is thinking of the boom boom room. Why else would a bloke on Fab initiate? Unless it's a private message to do with a forum topic or the like. If its a random hi to start a convo the end goal is the no pants dance surely. I'm not having I just want to say hi for hi's sake" Well that's not wholeheartedly true now is it? That have been people of conversations started without the intent to get your bit at the end of it, I've talked to two different couples before purely based on their chosen names as a reference to a game series and other people for different matters, so to say every message/conversation initiated by men means they thinking about fucking at the end of it, is bullshit | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Speaking for all men... Yes. Yes they will." No. No they wont. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well, I’m a man. I am also on Fab. And I am here for my very own reasons. Would I shag/ride absolutely any woman? Not a bloody chance! I never have and I never will!!! There are plenty of men just like me on here, I have no doubt of that whatsoever. Equally, I would concede that there are plenty of men on here who fall into that category of ‘anything with a pulse’. Off the top of my head? Any man who sends a message to a blank profile which has no text or no photos on it… now there’s a generalisation about men from a man. But to say we should all be dumped into that demographic just because we happen to have a cock??? That’s like saying all women are bad drivers, or that no man will ever ask for directions… okay, I’ll give you that last one in fairness?! Those guys are the same guys who would probably ride/shag me too if I threw on a dress… and I don’t mind admitting that I am one ugly woman… god it feels so liberating to admit it! So the next time someone sends you a message that screams ‘“I’ve got my entire sexual education from watching porn”, please don’t generalise us? Just hit the block button, smile, wave, and move on to the next fucking idiot. And that is me recognising that it can be tough and exhausting for genuine women on here as a result of some men’s actions. We (and I speak for my people) are all not the same! Apart from the directions thing! Two words… Google Maps!!! " Great. Now I have a vision of you in a dress stuck in my head | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well, I’m a man. I am also on Fab. And I am here for my very own reasons. Would I shag/ride absolutely any woman? Not a bloody chance! I never have and I never will!!! There are plenty of men just like me on here, I have no doubt of that whatsoever. Equally, I would concede that there are plenty of men on here who fall into that category of ‘anything with a pulse’. Off the top of my head? Any man who sends a message to a blank profile which has no text or no photos on it… now there’s a generalisation about men from a man. But to say we should all be dumped into that demographic just because we happen to have a cock??? That’s like saying all women are bad drivers, or that no man will ever ask for directions… okay, I’ll give you that last one in fairness?! Those guys are the same guys who would probably ride/shag me too if I threw on a dress… and I don’t mind admitting that I am one ugly woman… god it feels so liberating to admit it! So the next time someone sends you a message that screams ‘“I’ve got my entire sexual education from watching porn”, please don’t generalise us? Just hit the block button, smile, wave, and move on to the next fucking idiot. And that is me recognising that it can be tough and exhausting for genuine women on here as a result of some men’s actions. We (and I speak for my people) are all not the same! Apart from the directions thing! Two words… Google Maps!!! Great. Now I have a vision of you in a dress stuck in my head " I’m thinking something flattering???? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well, I’m a man. I am also on Fab. And I am here for my very own reasons. Would I shag/ride absolutely any woman? Not a bloody chance! I never have and I never will!!! There are plenty of men just like me on here, I have no doubt of that whatsoever. Equally, I would concede that there are plenty of men on here who fall into that category of ‘anything with a pulse’. Off the top of my head? Any man who sends a message to a blank profile which has no text or no photos on it… now there’s a generalisation about men from a man. But to say we should all be dumped into that demographic just because we happen to have a cock??? That’s like saying all women are bad drivers, or that no man will ever ask for directions… okay, I’ll give you that last one in fairness?! Those guys are the same guys who would probably ride/shag me too if I threw on a dress… and I don’t mind admitting that I am one ugly woman… god it feels so liberating to admit it! So the next time someone sends you a message that screams ‘“I’ve got my entire sexual education from watching porn”, please don’t generalise us? Just hit the block button, smile, wave, and move on to the next fucking idiot. And that is me recognising that it can be tough and exhausting for genuine women on here as a result of some men’s actions. We (and I speak for my people) are all not the same! Apart from the directions thing! Two words… Google Maps!!! " Well said . P.s google maps can send you up the wrong path too sometimes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's probably more disturbing is the reference to other human beings as "anything"" Does it exclusively refer to human beings? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well, I’m a man. I am also on Fab. And I am here for my very own reasons. Would I shag/ride absolutely any woman? Not a bloody chance! I never have and I never will!!! There are plenty of men just like me on here, I have no doubt of that whatsoever. Equally, I would concede that there are plenty of men on here who fall into that category of ‘anything with a pulse’. Off the top of my head? Any man who sends a message to a blank profile which has no text or no photos on it… now there’s a generalisation about men from a man. But to say we should all be dumped into that demographic just because we happen to have a cock??? That’s like saying all women are bad drivers, or that no man will ever ask for directions… okay, I’ll give you that last one in fairness?! Those guys are the same guys who would probably ride/shag me too if I threw on a dress… and I don’t mind admitting that I am one ugly woman… god it feels so liberating to admit it! So the next time someone sends you a message that screams ‘“I’ve got my entire sexual education from watching porn”, please don’t generalise us? Just hit the block button, smile, wave, and move on to the next fucking idiot. And that is me recognising that it can be tough and exhausting for genuine women on here as a result of some men’s actions. We (and I speak for my people) are all not the same! Apart from the directions thing! Two words… Google Maps!!! " Yep But surely we're safe in generalising that men can't multitask? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well, I’m a man. I am also on Fab. And I am here for my very own reasons. Would I shag/ride absolutely any woman? Not a bloody chance! I never have and I never will!!! There are plenty of men just like me on here, I have no doubt of that whatsoever. Equally, I would concede that there are plenty of men on here who fall into that category of ‘anything with a pulse’. Off the top of my head? Any man who sends a message to a blank profile which has no text or no photos on it… now there’s a generalisation about men from a man. But to say we should all be dumped into that demographic just because we happen to have a cock??? That’s like saying all women are bad drivers, or that no man will ever ask for directions… okay, I’ll give you that last one in fairness?! Those guys are the same guys who would probably ride/shag me too if I threw on a dress… and I don’t mind admitting that I am one ugly woman… god it feels so liberating to admit it! So the next time someone sends you a message that screams ‘“I’ve got my entire sexual education from watching porn”, please don’t generalise us? Just hit the block button, smile, wave, and move on to the next fucking idiot. And that is me recognising that it can be tough and exhausting for genuine women on here as a result of some men’s actions. We (and I speak for my people) are all not the same! Apart from the directions thing! Two words… Google Maps!!! Yep But surely we're safe in generalising that men can't multitask? " Sorry guys… I was doing something else there… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well, I’m a man. I am also on Fab. And I am here for my very own reasons. Would I shag/ride absolutely any woman? Not a bloody chance! I never have and I never will!!! There are plenty of men just like me on here, I have no doubt of that whatsoever. Equally, I would concede that there are plenty of men on here who fall into that category of ‘anything with a pulse’. Off the top of my head? Any man who sends a message to a blank profile which has no text or no photos on it… now there’s a generalisation about men from a man. But to say we should all be dumped into that demographic just because we happen to have a cock??? That’s like saying all women are bad drivers, or that no man will ever ask for directions… okay, I’ll give you that last one in fairness?! Those guys are the same guys who would probably ride/shag me too if I threw on a dress… and I don’t mind admitting that I am one ugly woman… god it feels so liberating to admit it! So the next time someone sends you a message that screams ‘“I’ve got my entire sexual education from watching porn”, please don’t generalise us? Just hit the block button, smile, wave, and move on to the next fucking idiot. And that is me recognising that it can be tough and exhausting for genuine women on here as a result of some men’s actions. We (and I speak for my people) are all not the same! Apart from the directions thing! Two words… Google Maps!!! " Good man for saying it like it is. Good forbid men stand up for themselves from time to time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"GUILTY AS CHARGED… my opening line is “girls will ride who they want and lads will ride ANYONE” if I am one of many stating this then it’s a general assumption but Please don’t let my findings upset you. They are not based on messages, conversations but purely PERSONAL observations that I have noted. I have met very nice men all who are very selective but I stand by what I’ve seen. One persons general opinion should not cause you personal upset. I’ve had many abusive messages over it but like most profiles , if you don’t like it move on. A guilty conscience can cause many triggers x " I actually sent you a message regarding your statement!!! now look what you started!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"GUILTY AS CHARGED… my opening line is “girls will ride who they want and lads will ride ANYONE” if I am one of many stating this then it’s a general assumption but Please don’t let my findings upset you. They are not based on messages, conversations but purely PERSONAL observations that I have noted. I have met very nice men all who are very selective but I stand by what I’ve seen. One persons general opinion should not cause you personal upset. I’ve had many abusive messages over it but like most profiles , if you don’t like it move on. A guilty conscience can cause many triggers x I actually sent you a message regarding your statement!!! now look what you started!!!! " Many have … it’s ok I’ll still stand by my findings | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well, I’m a man. I am also on Fab. And I am here for my very own reasons. Would I shag/ride absolutely any woman? Not a bloody chance! I never have and I never will!!! There are plenty of men just like me on here, I have no doubt of that whatsoever. Equally, I would concede that there are plenty of men on here who fall into that category of ‘anything with a pulse’. Off the top of my head? Any man who sends a message to a blank profile which has no text or no photos on it… now there’s a generalisation about men from a man. But to say we should all be dumped into that demographic just because we happen to have a cock??? That’s like saying all women are bad drivers, or that no man will ever ask for directions… okay, I’ll give you that last one in fairness?! Those guys are the same guys who would probably ride/shag me too if I threw on a dress… and I don’t mind admitting that I am one ugly woman… god it feels so liberating to admit it! So the next time someone sends you a message that screams ‘“I’ve got my entire sexual education from watching porn”, please don’t generalise us? Just hit the block button, smile, wave, and move on to the next fucking idiot. And that is me recognising that it can be tough and exhausting for genuine women on here as a result of some men’s actions. We (and I speak for my people) are all not the same! Apart from the directions thing! Two words… Google Maps!!! Yep But surely we're safe in generalising that men can't multitask? " Not at all | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"GUILTY AS CHARGED… my opening line is “girls will ride who they want and lads will ride ANYONE” if I am one of many stating this then it’s a general assumption but Please don’t let my findings upset you. They are not based on messages, conversations but purely PERSONAL observations that I have noted. I have met very nice men all who are very selective but I stand by what I’ve seen. One persons general opinion should not cause you personal upset. I’ve had many abusive messages over it but like most profiles , if you don’t like it move on. A guilty conscience can cause many triggers x I actually sent you a message regarding your statement!!! now look what you started!!!! Many have … it’s ok I’ll still stand by my findings " I feel bad for you. You've not had enough of the good ones approach you. The problem is that the ladies who have very attractive profiles like you, will attract every man. I admit that there are many mutts on here who would get up on the crack of dawn but those who have manners, class and respect don't lead with that idea. You must get to know someone to truly click with them and make the intimacy as good as it can be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"GUILTY AS CHARGED… my opening line is “girls will ride who they want and lads will ride ANYONE” if I am one of many stating this then it’s a general assumption but Please don’t let my findings upset you. They are not based on messages, conversations but purely PERSONAL observations that I have noted. I have met very nice men all who are very selective but I stand by what I’ve seen. One persons general opinion should not cause you personal upset. I’ve had many abusive messages over it but like most profiles , if you don’t like it move on. A guilty conscience can cause many triggers x I actually sent you a message regarding your statement!!! now look what you started!!!! Many have … it’s ok I’ll still stand by my findings I feel bad for you. You've not had enough of the good ones approach you. The problem is that the ladies who have very attractive profiles like you, will attract every man. I admit that there are many mutts on here who would get up on the crack of dawn but those who have manners, class and respect don't lead with that idea. You must get to know someone to truly click with them and make the intimacy as good as it can be." Please don’t feel bad for me and please listen to what I am actually saying. My statement was not based on messages of any kind, how could I make such an assumption because somebody sends a crude message.my statement was not a general crack at men but something I witnessed and observed for my self due to a few situations. I wouldn’t be so narrow minded to put all men into one basket. I have met some of the finest men on fab wil continue to do. I do hope you do too . Happy fabbing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know this is random but can anyone guide me how to use this website? I'm still new and awful with what I'm to do here. Over a year on here isnt really new to the place " Ah it is really. I've only been here in Covid times too and it seems like there's been fuck all happening most of the time I've been here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"GUILTY AS CHARGED… my opening line is “girls will ride who they want and lads will ride ANYONE” if I am one of many stating this then it’s a general assumption but Please don’t let my findings upset you. They are not based on messages, conversations but purely PERSONAL observations that I have noted. I have met very nice men all who are very selective but I stand by what I’ve seen. One persons general opinion should not cause you personal upset. I’ve had many abusive messages over it but like most profiles , if you don’t like it move on. A guilty conscience can cause many triggers x I actually sent you a message regarding your statement!!! now look what you started!!!! Many have … it’s ok I’ll still stand by my findings I feel bad for you. You've not had enough of the good ones approach you. The problem is that the ladies who have very attractive profiles like you, will attract every man. I admit that there are many mutts on here who would get up on the crack of dawn but those who have manners, class and respect don't lead with that idea. You must get to know someone to truly click with them and make the intimacy as good as it can be. Please don’t feel bad for me and please listen to what I am actually saying. My statement was not based on messages of any kind, how could I make such an assumption because somebody sends a crude message.my statement was not a general crack at men but something I witnessed and observed for my self due to a few situations. I wouldn’t be so narrow minded to put all men into one basket. I have met some of the finest men on fab wil continue to do. I do hope you do too . Happy fabbing " I'm not here to meet men so I hope that doesn't happen but I appreciate your point. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just put ur cock in her ...." Would you not at least ask her where she'd prefer you to put it before you jam your stumpy hotdog into her? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You could look at it from an evolution point of view i.e. men's purpose is to spread his seed far and wide, women will be far more selective in choosing good genes for their offspring. Why would this not carry forward to the present day?" Only lads speaking sense as always. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You could look at it from an evolution point of view i.e. men's purpose is to spread his seed far and wide, women will be far more selective in choosing good genes for their offspring. Why would this not carry forward to the present day? Only lads speaking sense as always." Well, apart from the fella who said the exact same thing a few days ago! Yes, me! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"GUILTY AS CHARGED… my opening line is “girls will ride who they want and lads will ride ANYONE” if I am one of many stating this then it’s a general assumption but Please don’t let my findings upset you. They are not based on messages, conversations but purely PERSONAL observations that I have noted. I have met very nice men all who are very selective but I stand by what I’ve seen. One persons general opinion should not cause you personal upset. I’ve had many abusive messages over it but like most profiles , if you don’t like it move on. A guilty conscience can cause many triggers x " I realise that your comment is a general one...perhaps it is a fact that some men are more easily persuaded and less discerning at times - equally there are other guys that are very selective. Males are instinctively hunters.. but some ladies do also have that characteristic too... but much more rare than in men | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You could look at it from an evolution point of view i.e. men's purpose is to spread his seed far and wide, women will be far more selective in choosing good genes for their offspring. Why would this not carry forward to the present day? Only lads speaking sense as always. Well, apart from the fella who said the exact same thing a few days ago! Yes, me! " Get used to it McCarthy, there's no respect anymore for the elderly and their wisdom. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is like a finger, pointing away to the moon. Don't concentrate on the finger, or you will miss all that heavenly glory." The heavenly glory which is so far out of reach I prefer the stinkin' finger, it might come in useful | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |