FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > new type of sexuality

new type of sexuality

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *iven to the Wild OP   Couple  over a year ago

Batley

There is another website that has a greater number of options when determining sexuality. Among them is the term 'heteexible' which i think would be a useful option on here.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *alandNitaCouple  over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"There is another website that has a greater number of options when determining sexuality. Among them is the term 'heteexible' which i think would be a useful option on here."

I agree that there needs to be a lot wider range of options on here.

Orally bi seems to be something that would be useful. I've seen a few posts recently, mainly by men, who are stating bi-curious rather than bi as orally bi isn't an option.

Many would also like bi-playful or "situationally bi" as they feel that fits them better.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There is another website that has a greater number of options when determining sexuality. Among them is the term 'heteexible' which i think would be a useful option on here."

Fully agree! I'm not fully bi, or really curious, but I recently sucked a guy whilst I was fucking his wife. I would say I'm situationally bi-oral, or flexible. But it all depends on circumstances. I think pansexual is more prevalent here than bi...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It'd be nice to be able to search by orientation fully, not just whether both in a couple are bi alone. So many profiles just have the looking for all genders boxes ticked yet so many are supposedly straight. Or what if the guy in a couple is bi but the girl isn't?

Or what if you're looking for a gay guy? I know there's fabguys, but the guys on there in general seem to also have profiles on here too, plus it'd be nice for gay women to be able to search easily for other gay women too

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iamondjoeMan  over a year ago

Glastonbury


"There is another website that has a greater number of options when determining sexuality. Among them is the term 'heteexible' which i think would be a useful option on here.

I agree that there needs to be a lot wider range of options on here.

Orally bi seems to be something that would be useful. I've seen a few posts recently, mainly by men, who are stating bi-curious rather than bi as orally bi isn't an option.

Many would also like bi-playful or "situationally bi" as they feel that fits them better.

"

* seasonally bi?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ady4ladyWoman  over a year ago

liverpool

Too many labels and options make it difficult to know if your cumming or going.

Its easier to just put it simply in your profile.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I like the term Omnisexual

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *otsoSnowWhiteWoman  over a year ago

My Ice Castle! South Wales

Bi selective I like

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

To me, everyone is just 'sexual'. That should be our label. Then in terms of preferences and activities, people can describe them as they like in their profile.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eonlylive1seCouple  over a year ago

Atherstone

We use 'trysexual' as in if it feels right at the time we'll try it

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *oneybee-vtyCouple  over a year ago

durham

Its ok to put everything on profile. but many many seem not to read thoroughly, just glance and think they have read.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0