FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > SHOULD FAB INCREASE FEES?
SHOULD FAB INCREASE FEES?
Jump to: Newest in thread
I do think that a charge before you are able to send messages would help a little bit. Would it eliminate time wasters, no, but I think it would reduce the number of time wasters and fakes some what. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Personally I think an awful lot of problems around unwanted mail, people wanting pictures etc who he solved by judicious use of mail filters, enthusiastic use of the block button and detailed use of the search feature  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *CExeCouple 9 weeks ago
Lincoln/Exeter |
Absolutely this. Use of the filters and advanced search option makes the site so much better.
Free to use is definitely best, though maybe a verified and members only forum would be good. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *bi HaiveMan 9 weeks ago
Forum Mod Cheeseville, Somerset |
"should fab increase the fees to disuade the timewasters, fakes and pic collectors?
a fiver is naff all for most people these days"
I've never met a fake or a timewaster. All the people I've met have definitely been real as I made physical contact with them, whether just a handshake, a peck on the cheek or more.
As for pic collectors? Anything I've posted publicly is there for all to see. I'm more choosy about who sees anything else so don't really fall foul to collectors.
Fees aren't the magic wand some think they are. A tub of Lurpak (other butters/spreads are also available) I'd as pricey ad a month on Fab. There's also a big wife world of nudity and porn on the Internet, some of which costs way more and yet people still pay for it.
Just be sensible in who you engage with and how. That will solve most of the issues with disingenuous folk. 🤷♂️ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"should fab increase the fees to disuade the timewasters, fakes and pic collectors?
a fiver is naff all for most people these days"
No I don't think they should increase the fees.
Most Fabsters are not fakes. A fiver is not naff all to some people.
How do you know people are picture collectors, most probably just perv the photos and why shouldn't they if they are there?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *uzzleMan 9 weeks ago
Hastings |
I don't think raising the fees would increase membership or stop timewasters.
The biggest flaw on this site is the cock to pussy ratio. Its the same at naturist beach, guys are happy to get their cock out and wonder round, women are less inclinded to get naked.
If you increase fees, I think single guys especially will be put off which will make the cock to pussy ratio worse than it is now!
Plus it needs to be an increase across the board and not just for single males, otherwise I think you will get more guys creating a couples profile where the female is 'unavailable'..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think raising the fees would increase membership or stop timewasters.
The biggest flaw on this site is the cock to pussy ratio. Its the same at naturist beach, guys are happy to get their cock out and wonder round, women are less inclinded to get naked.
If you increase fees, I think single guys especially will be put off which will make the cock to pussy ratio worse than it is now!
Plus it needs to be an increase across the board and not just for single males, otherwise I think you will get more guys creating a couples profile where the female is 'unavailable'....."
Surely if you put off single guys the cock to pussy ratio will be better ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *uzzleMan 9 weeks ago
Hastings |
"I don't think raising the fees would increase membership or stop timewasters.
The biggest flaw on this site is the cock to pussy ratio. Its the same at naturist beach, guys are happy to get their cock out and wonder round, women are less inclinded to get naked.
If you increase fees, I think single guys especially will be put off which will make the cock to pussy ratio worse than it is now!
Plus it needs to be an increase across the board and not just for single males, otherwise I think you will get more guys creating a couples profile where the female is 'unavailable'.....
Surely if you put off single guys the cock to pussy ratio will be better ? "
It won't be better, it will be stagnant and may eventually lead to the closure of Fab. Single guys won't pay to join or send messages because its a waste of time now. Definetly a waste of time to be paying for it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *hismMan 9 weeks ago
Ballygonowhere |
"should fab increase the fees to disuade the timewasters, fakes and pic collectors?
a fiver is naff all for most people these days"
As far as I'm aware,fab doesn't charge folk,unless they want the extra features available
I'm quite happy paying nothing for the limited features I get
It's not like I'm messaging or wanting to message every woman/couple on the site |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"should fab increase the fees to disuade the timewasters, fakes and pic collectors?"
I'm not sure I understand the logic here. To dissuade pic collectors, timewasters and so called fakes from operating a free account, you want us as site supporters to pay more?
Have you really thought that through?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
