FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Hypocrites
Hypocrites
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So if you regularly go shopping you are a judgemental hypocrite. If you fill up so you don't have to go shopping you are a hoarder/panic buyer. If you do neither you die of starvation. Oh what a happy world we live in." If they dont condone people meeting another human being out of the necessity of their mental health but go shopping yes they are judgmental hypocrites. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So many people casting judgement on here. If you do not practice what you preach then you have no right to judge. If you're going to supermarkets you're not isolating. It's a public place and one which has the most foot traffic than anywhere else in the country now. When you understand the ways in which you can be infected by the virus then hopefully people will show more understanding, empathy and compassion. The virus spreads most in forms of micro droplets. Which come from breathing, coughing and sneezing. Every breath and infected person makes expels the virus from their body. On to which is surfaces that have varying rates in which the virus survives outside of the body. It lingers in the air for up to 3hrs. So in an infected person goes shopping then you're surrounded with potential means of catching it. Everything you touch and everywhere you breathe you're at risk. But going shopping people find acceptable they aren't judging people who go shopping. So when it comes to someone meeting someone privately in a private residence people lose their shit and out comes the judgement. But consider the risks who is taking more risks and who is putting more people at risk. Then we have the nhs workers who work directly with victims of the virus. Who go shopping... see where this is going? They are all potential carriers of the virus. To make more sense would be to have shuttle buses for nhs workers dealing with the victims. Saves spreading the virus through public transport and fuel stations by refilling their cars. The government to provide food for the nhs workers so they don't attend large foot traffic areas like supermarkets. Compensate the nhs workers who are in immediate risk of the virus, but also support the public by isolating the possible carriers even though they are doing their job they put others at risk by going to supermarkets. In severe deadly outbreaks it would be the health providers directly quarantined with the patients. They don't get to leave the quarantine whether or not they're infected. So begs the question why if it's so serious that nhs workers directly involved with victims of the virus is this not the case? Why I dare say is compassion for the nhs workers and the need to be with family. People considering the mental health well being of all of this. Not everyone has a support network. Some people are just trying to balance their mental health and seeing as 1 on 1 meets in a private residence has less chance of spread than the above can people stop making judgements on them which is also detrimental to their mental health. Mental health plays a huge roll in physical health. High levels of cortisol has an effect on the immune system. Increasing the odds of being severely affected by not just covid19 but other infections. If you don't leave your house and completely isolated yourself alone and manage to stay sane through it all I think you'll be just fine you'd have battled through and deserve appraisal. But we haven't got through it yet Loneliness and isolation is what breaks people down. Many of you get to isolate with another or other individuals, you still see loved ones and friends. Many of you have only just began living isolated life. Days and weeks soon people will understand what it's like being alone and will need mental health support from where ever they can get it. I'm quite sure nhs workers don't want suicide rates to go up, self harming rates to go up so if people need to meet don't judge them because you'll find yourself being a hypocrite when you leave your house to get what you need from the shops and what ever else makes you leave your house. It's easy to make judgement but look in the mirror first before you do, reflect on what you're actually doing first. I'm not putting health workers down but I am saying is judgement of people here is appalling and yet they judge without seeing the whole picture. Narrowminded that focuses on 1 thing and that's the fact they don't care about anyone else but themselves. They don't see people shopping as a risk because they do it. It's not risky to them in their eyes if others are doing it. Since they aren't meeting people to support their mental health other people who do are wrong. Time will tell how many people will change their _iews. Cabin fever sets in, the little voice in your head gets louder because you've ran out of distractions and you're left with thoughts. There's a reason inmates punishment of isolation rectifies behaviour. Humans need social contact. Think before you cast judgement" I think it's more about avoiding what's unnecessary and obviously getting food is necessary as would be getting medication,hence why those businesses are still open even when a country is on lockdown. Meeting up randomly to fulfill a desire is not necessary at this point in time and that's where people take issue with it. We are lucky in this day and age that we can communicate with others online and therefore nobody needs to be completely isolated from the outside world. Those healthcare,police, firefighters are putting their lives on the line to look after us,it can't really be compared x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So many people casting judgement on here. If you do not practice what you preach then you have no right to judge. If you're going to supermarkets you're not isolating. It's a public place and one which has the most foot traffic than anywhere else in the country now. When you understand the ways in which you can be infected by the virus then hopefully people will show more understanding, empathy and compassion. The virus spreads most in forms of micro droplets. Which come from breathing, coughing and sneezing. Every breath and infected person makes expels the virus from their body. On to which is surfaces that have varying rates in which the virus survives outside of the body. It lingers in the air for up to 3hrs. So in an infected person goes shopping then you're surrounded with potential means of catching it. Everything you touch and everywhere you breathe you're at risk. But going shopping people find acceptable they aren't judging people who go shopping. So when it comes to someone meeting someone privately in a private residence people lose their shit and out comes the judgement. But consider the risks who is taking more risks and who is putting more people at risk. Then we have the nhs workers who work directly with victims of the virus. Who go shopping... see where this is going? They are all potential carriers of the virus. To make more sense would be to have shuttle buses for nhs workers dealing with the victims. Saves spreading the virus through public transport and fuel stations by refilling their cars. The government to provide food for the nhs workers so they don't attend large foot traffic areas like supermarkets. Compensate the nhs workers who are in immediate risk of the virus, but also support the public by isolating the possible carriers even though they are doing their job they put others at risk by going to supermarkets. In severe deadly outbreaks it would be the health providers directly quarantined with the patients. They don't get to leave the quarantine whether or not they're infected. So begs the question why if it's so serious that nhs workers directly involved with victims of the virus is this not the case? Why I dare say is compassion for the nhs workers and the need to be with family. People considering the mental health well being of all of this. Not everyone has a support network. Some people are just trying to balance their mental health and seeing as 1 on 1 meets in a private residence has less chance of spread than the above can people stop making judgements on them which is also detrimental to their mental health. Mental health plays a huge roll in physical health. High levels of cortisol has an effect on the immune system. Increasing the odds of being severely affected by not just covid19 but other infections. If you don't leave your house and completely isolated yourself alone and manage to stay sane through it all I think you'll be just fine you'd have battled through and deserve appraisal. But we haven't got through it yet Loneliness and isolation is what breaks people down. Many of you get to isolate with another or other individuals, you still see loved ones and friends. Many of you have only just began living isolated life. Days and weeks soon people will understand what it's like being alone and will need mental health support from where ever they can get it. I'm quite sure nhs workers don't want suicide rates to go up, self harming rates to go up so if people need to meet don't judge them because you'll find yourself being a hypocrite when you leave your house to get what you need from the shops and what ever else makes you leave your house. It's easy to make judgement but look in the mirror first before you do, reflect on what you're actually doing first. I'm not putting health workers down but I am saying is judgement of people here is appalling and yet they judge without seeing the whole picture. Narrowminded that focuses on 1 thing and that's the fact they don't care about anyone else but themselves. They don't see people shopping as a risk because they do it. It's not risky to them in their eyes if others are doing it. Since they aren't meeting people to support their mental health other people who do are wrong. Time will tell how many people will change their _iews. Cabin fever sets in, the little voice in your head gets louder because you've ran out of distractions and you're left with thoughts. There's a reason inmates punishment of isolation rectifies behaviour. Humans need social contact. Think before you cast judgement I think it's more about avoiding what's unnecessary and obviously getting food is necessary as would be getting medication,hence why those businesses are still open even when a country is on lockdown. Meeting up randomly to fulfill a desire is not necessary at this point in time and that's where people take issue with it. We are lucky in this day and age that we can communicate with others online and therefore nobody needs to be completely isolated from the outside world. Those healthcare,police, firefighters are putting their lives on the line to look after us,it can't really be compared x" This. 
And when you go shopping you can keep your distance. Yesterday I made sure no-one came within 2 metres of me and anyone using the same aisle, I moved away.
I parked in the far corner of the car park and I went home straight afterwards.
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? " Yes | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your only sounding off because you've been having meets. " I'm being judged as I always am. I'm judged for being a sexually liberated woman. I'm judged for trying to balance my mental health. People judging others when their actions are questionable also. Forced closure of clubs Friday and everything since people are judging it's amazing how people change. I have an evening with 2 fwbs and I'm treated with utter disdain. No one knows what goes on in my life or anyone else's but they sit here casting judgement and yet do not consider their own actions. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x " So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So many people casting judgement on here. If you do not practice what you preach then you have no right to judge. If you're going to supermarkets you're not isolating. It's a public place and one which has the most foot traffic than anywhere else in the country now. When you understand the ways in which you can be infected by the virus then hopefully people will show more understanding, empathy and compassion. The virus spreads most in forms of micro droplets. Which come from breathing, coughing and sneezing. Every breath and infected person makes expels the virus from their body. On to which is surfaces that have varying rates in which the virus survives outside of the body. It lingers in the air for up to 3hrs. So in an infected person goes shopping then you're surrounded with potential means of catching it. Everything you touch and everywhere you breathe you're at risk. But going shopping people find acceptable they aren't judging people who go shopping. So when it comes to someone meeting someone privately in a private residence people lose their shit and out comes the judgement. But consider the risks who is taking more risks and who is putting more people at risk. Then we have the nhs workers who work directly with victims of the virus. Who go shopping... see where this is going? They are all potential carriers of the virus. To make more sense would be to have shuttle buses for nhs workers dealing with the victims. Saves spreading the virus through public transport and fuel stations by refilling their cars. The government to provide food for the nhs workers so they don't attend large foot traffic areas like supermarkets. Compensate the nhs workers who are in immediate risk of the virus, but also support the public by isolating the possible carriers even though they are doing their job they put others at risk by going to supermarkets. In severe deadly outbreaks it would be the health providers directly quarantined with the patients. They don't get to leave the quarantine whether or not they're infected. So begs the question why if it's so serious that nhs workers directly involved with victims of the virus is this not the case? Why I dare say is compassion for the nhs workers and the need to be with family. People considering the mental health well being of all of this. Not everyone has a support network. Some people are just trying to balance their mental health and seeing as 1 on 1 meets in a private residence has less chance of spread than the above can people stop making judgements on them which is also detrimental to their mental health. Mental health plays a huge roll in physical health. High levels of cortisol has an effect on the immune system. Increasing the odds of being severely affected by not just covid19 but other infections. If you don't leave your house and completely isolated yourself alone and manage to stay sane through it all I think you'll be just fine you'd have battled through and deserve appraisal. But we haven't got through it yet Loneliness and isolation is what breaks people down. Many of you get to isolate with another or other individuals, you still see loved ones and friends. Many of you have only just began living isolated life. Days and weeks soon people will understand what it's like being alone and will need mental health support from where ever they can get it. I'm quite sure nhs workers don't want suicide rates to go up, self harming rates to go up so if people need to meet don't judge them because you'll find yourself being a hypocrite when you leave your house to get what you need from the shops and what ever else makes you leave your house. It's easy to make judgement but look in the mirror first before you do, reflect on what you're actually doing first. I'm not putting health workers down but I am saying is judgement of people here is appalling and yet they judge without seeing the whole picture. Narrowminded that focuses on 1 thing and that's the fact they don't care about anyone else but themselves. They don't see people shopping as a risk because they do it. It's not risky to them in their eyes if others are doing it. Since they aren't meeting people to support their mental health other people who do are wrong. Time will tell how many people will change their _iews. Cabin fever sets in, the little voice in your head gets louder because you've ran out of distractions and you're left with thoughts. There's a reason inmates punishment of isolation rectifies behaviour. Humans need social contact. Think before you cast judgement I think it's more about avoiding what's unnecessary and obviously getting food is necessary as would be getting medication,hence why those businesses are still open even when a country is on lockdown. Meeting up randomly to fulfill a desire is not necessary at this point in time and that's where people take issue with it. We are lucky in this day and age that we can communicate with others online and therefore nobody needs to be completely isolated from the outside world. Those healthcare,police, firefighters are putting their lives on the line to look after us,it can't really be compared x This.
And when you go shopping you can keep your distance. Yesterday I made sure no-one came within 2 metres of me and anyone using the same aisle, I moved away.
I parked in the far corner of the car park and I went home straight afterwards.
"And yet you picked up items in which others have touched and breathed on. You've touched items and surfaces and breathed the same air as other people. Again not understanding the nature of how contamination occurs. Distance of 2m is based on the distance a normal breath travels. A cough and sneeze that's 8m. So potential contamination is 100s of people and yet 2 people meeting in a private residence is lower than that of going shopping. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your only sounding off because you've been having meets. I'm being judged as I always am. I'm judged for being a sexually liberated woman. I'm judged for trying to balance my mental health. People judging others when their actions are questionable also. Forced closure of clubs Friday and everything since people are judging it's amazing how people change. I have an evening with 2 fwbs and I'm treated with utter disdain. No one knows what goes on in my life or anyone else's but they sit here casting judgement and yet do not consider their own actions. " No judgement from me.... We all have to make our own decisions... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? " no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? " Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? " If I want human connection I see a friend from a safe distance. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? If I want human connection I see a friend from a safe distance. " Or FaceTime  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. " You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your only sounding off because you've been having meets. I'm being judged as I always am. I'm judged for being a sexually liberated woman. I'm judged for trying to balance my mental health. People judging others when their actions are questionable also. Forced closure of clubs Friday and everything since people are judging it's amazing how people change. I have an evening with 2 fwbs and I'm treated with utter disdain. No one knows what goes on in my life or anyone else's but they sit here casting judgement and yet do not consider their own actions. No judgement from me.... We all have to make our own decisions..."
People will make decisions based on their needs. I'm waiting in couple of weeks how many of these judgemental people will begin to meet again just to save their sanity. They will discover that digital connection isn't enough. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? If I want human connection I see a friend from a safe distance. Or FaceTime "There really have never been so many ways to connect with people from distance as there is now | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? If I want human connection I see a friend from a safe distance. Or FaceTime
There really have never been so many ways to connect with people from distance as there is now "Will see how long people last who have never been isolated before. These means of connecting to others digitally won't be the same as actual human interaction. You'll discover its dehumanizing | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds..." And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds... And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking." Better find an alternative than spreading a virus that’s killed thousands, especially to vulnerable people. Acting without thinking... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds..." you obviously know better than the proper advice I have been given from on high then...  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What I don't get is loads on these forums saying stay safe take precautions etc which is totally correct yet look at their profile and says bareback sex only , the mind boggles." I've brought this up on another thread. People pick and choose and cast judgement. They don't see that stds as important as this yet it has consequences the same. If people can't practice what they preach they have no right to judge. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds... you obviously know better than the proper advice I have been given from on high then... "I do that’s right | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? If I want human connection I see a friend from a safe distance. Or FaceTime
There really have never been so many ways to connect with people from distance as there is now
Will see how long people last who have never been isolated before. These means of connecting to others digitally won't be the same as actual human interaction. You'll discover its dehumanizing"It is not dehumanising. I've been through it before, with less digital social options than we have now. It is a huge advantage that we have and you are greatly underestimating and undervaluing it. The 2 things that digital can not fully help with are distance from loved ones. It is not "people" that we crave interaction from but specific people that we are familiar with. Not being around family, a mother or father away from their children etc. The other being physical interaction, this however is partially connected to the above, but also is less about physically interacting with people but just a desire for sexual instinct. One that is quite easily suppressed with a little effort. Hell lots of men on here have been sexually isolated for much longer than what is currently being asked during this global situation. You have an issue with people judging you, but you have no problem dismissing and undervaluing an extremely important lifeline that has saved so many lives. A very important lifeline that you clearly do not understand. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds... And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking. Better find an alternative than spreading a virus that’s killed thousands, especially to vulnerable people. Acting without thinking..." If you know of a better way please share. Volunteers are doing the same thing people getting paid to do. Like home delivery services which are not available due to the fact everyone is accessing the service. What do you expect people to do? If you want to judge and not support the vulnerable then I suggest you find another solution to rectify it. Because people are doing they best they can, and judged for it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What I don't get is loads on these forums saying stay safe take precautions etc which is totally correct yet look at their profile and says bareback sex only , the mind boggles. I've brought this up on another thread. People pick and choose and cast judgement. They don't see that stds as important as this yet it has consequences the same. If people can't practice what they preach they have no right to judge." I think things just get confusing when in reality it's all pretty simple. If you go to the supermarket etc you avoid touching your face and wash your hands to take precautions,yes germs are everywhere but by taking those precautions you are minimising risk. The whole point of social distancing and isolation is to lessen the spread as much as possible, your friends may be carriers with no symptoms and so people think they are safe when in contact with others but are passing a virus to the vulnerable without knowing it. I don't think it's about making judgements as such it's more just the fact that when all advice is clear and the reasons why,that people still take 'unnecessary' risks. The NHS can't cope at the best of times, advice is there for everyone's benefit People just need to listen to it..... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds... And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking. Better find an alternative than spreading a virus that’s killed thousands, especially to vulnerable people. Acting without thinking... If you know of a better way please share. Volunteers are doing the same thing people getting paid to do. Like home delivery services which are not available due to the fact everyone is accessing the service. What do you expect people to do? If you want to judge and not support the vulnerable then I suggest you find another solution to rectify it. Because people are doing they best they can, and judged for it. " Just let everyone fend for them self, strongest survives and the weak well they don’t | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds... you obviously know better than the proper advice I have been given from on high then...
I do that’s right "I'll agree to disagree and in the meantime I shall carry on helping people because in these uncertain times I'd much rather keep busy doing something good than ideal and judgemental | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds... you obviously know better than the proper advice I have been given from on high then...
I do that’s right I'll agree to disagree and in the meantime I shall carry on helping people because in these uncertain times I'd much rather keep busy doing something good than ideal and judgemental "Your my hero, single handily saving us | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? If I want human connection I see a friend from a safe distance. Or FaceTime
There really have never been so many ways to connect with people from distance as there is now
Will see how long people last who have never been isolated before. These means of connecting to others digitally won't be the same as actual human interaction. You'll discover its dehumanizing
It is not dehumanising. I've been through it before, with less digital social options than we have now. It is a huge advantage that we have and you are greatly underestimating and undervaluing it.
The 2 things that digital can not fully help with are distance from loved ones. It is not "people" that we crave interaction from but specific people that we are familiar with. Not being around family, a mother or father away from their children etc.
The other being physical interaction, this however is partially connected to the above, but also is less about physically interacting with people but just a desire for sexual instinct. One that is quite easily suppressed with a little effort.
Hell lots of men on here have been sexually isolated for much longer than what is currently being asked during this global situation.
You have an issue with people judging you, but you have no problem dismissing and undervaluing an extremely important lifeline that has saved so many lives. A very important lifeline that you clearly do not understand. "And you think I have family that I miss the attention of and that digital access will fix? I have more understanding than you care to comprehend. I've been isolated a very long time and I make sacrifices to have social interactions. When you sit alone 24hrs a day, day in day out for not weeks but years. Come back and tell me the face on a screen isn't dehumanizing. That you won't need the actual company of others just so you don't break completely. If people like me were on here just for sex I'd lie here with my legs spread instead every day as fugly as I am I'd always have cock if I wanted just that. But it isn't about just sex. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking." Someone gets it for them and leaves it on their doorstep. Is that so hard a concept to grasp? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I’m more than happy to judge. I live on my own, have no family close by and am now working from home. I’m managing to get by on a supermarket trip at the most weekly and have observed self distancing protocols where possible. I accept that there is a chance I may contract it despite this, but if that happens I can control who I might give it to. Do I like having to live my life like this? Absolutely not but the sooner we’re all doing it the sooner there’s a chance this thing might be over and normal life can resume. I’ve accepted that my needs, wants and desires are secondary to those of the nation and for the time being I am not the most important person in my life. " If youre one of the ones uncommon ones to be asymptomatic then you've been in a supermarket. How is that controlling it. How is going shopping less risky than meeting an individual in private? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking. Someone gets it for them and leaves it on their doorstep. Is that so hard a concept to grasp?" For some people yes. Apparently it's more dangerous to pick up a tin of beans than to shove your Johnson in someone's foo foo. (where's the shrug emoji when you need it?!) | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking. Someone gets it for them and leaves it on their doorstep. Is that so hard a concept to grasp?" You questioning me? On what? The fact the person was judging someone who is collecting shopping for vulnerable people? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? If I want human connection I see a friend from a safe distance. Or FaceTime
There really have never been so many ways to connect with people from distance as there is now
Will see how long people last who have never been isolated before. These means of connecting to others digitally won't be the same as actual human interaction. You'll discover its dehumanizing
It is not dehumanising. I've been through it before, with less digital social options than we have now. It is a huge advantage that we have and you are greatly underestimating and undervaluing it.
The 2 things that digital can not fully help with are distance from loved ones. It is not "people" that we crave interaction from but specific people that we are familiar with. Not being around family, a mother or father away from their children etc.
The other being physical interaction, this however is partially connected to the above, but also is less about physically interacting with people but just a desire for sexual instinct. One that is quite easily suppressed with a little effort.
Hell lots of men on here have been sexually isolated for much longer than what is currently being asked during this global situation.
You have an issue with people judging you, but you have no problem dismissing and undervaluing an extremely important lifeline that has saved so many lives. A very important lifeline that you clearly do not understand.
And you think I have family that I miss the attention of and that digital access will fix?
I have more understanding than you care to comprehend. I've been isolated a very long time and I make sacrifices to have social interactions.
When you sit alone 24hrs a day, day in day out for not weeks but years. Come back and tell me the face on a screen isn't dehumanizing. That you won't need the actual company of others just so you don't break completely.
If people like me were on here just for sex I'd lie here with my legs spread instead every day as fugly as I am I'd always have cock if I wanted just that. But it isn't about just sex. "Thing is in times of normality I really do get what you are saying, but these are not normal times! If everyone followed the advice as soon as it were issued we would stand a better chance of it being over sooner but because people ignore it,the choices will be made for us It's about looking at the needs of EVERYONE not just ourselves. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" I do that’s right I'll agree to disagree and in the meantime I shall carry on helping people because in these uncertain times I'd much rather keep busy doing something good than ideal and judgemental Your my hero, single handily saving us " sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. Perhaps instead of being all judgey. Go see if one of your neighbours needs some shopping or help. Check online for the groups looking for volunteers. They have not yet said you cant maintain a physical relationship with someone as long as you are sticking to certain limitations. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking. Someone gets it for them and leaves it on their doorstep. Is that so hard a concept to grasp? You questioning me? On what? The fact the person was judging someone who is collecting shopping for vulnerable people? " Yes you | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" I do that’s right I'll agree to disagree and in the meantime I shall carry on helping people because in these uncertain times I'd much rather keep busy doing something good than ideal and judgemental Your my hero, single handily saving us sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. Perhaps instead of being all judgey. Go see if one of your neighbours needs some shopping or help. Check online for the groups looking for volunteers. They have not yet said you cant maintain a physical relationship with someone as long as you are sticking to certain limitations. " Yes but then you are seeing said person then seeing vulnerable how thick do you need to be lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm desperately sorry I need to eat. My mental health is suffering too. My unhappy arse is at home, limiting infection. I'm only going out for necessities. Unfortunately, survival means sacrifices must be made." Absolutely | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking. Someone gets it for them and leaves it on their doorstep. Is that so hard a concept to grasp? You questioning me? On what? The fact the person was judging someone who is collecting shopping for vulnerable people? Yes you " And what about me the fact I am sick and tired of people judging others? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" People will make decisions based on their needs. I'm waiting in couple of weeks how many of these judgemental people will begin to meet again just to save their sanity. They will discover that digital connection isn't enough. " OH how true OP.....said before no judgement from me. Easy to be judgemental but life does and will go on.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I’m more than happy to judge. I live on my own, have no family close by and am now working from home. I’m managing to get by on a supermarket trip at the most weekly and have observed self distancing protocols where possible. I accept that there is a chance I may contract it despite this, but if that happens I can control who I might give it to. Do I like having to live my life like this? Absolutely not but the sooner we’re all doing it the sooner there’s a chance this thing might be over and normal life can resume. I’ve accepted that my needs, wants and desires are secondary to those of the nation and for the time being I am not the most important person in my life. If youre one of the ones uncommon ones to be asymptomatic then you've been in a supermarket. How is that controlling it. How is going shopping less risky than meeting an individual in private?" I need food to eat, it is a necessity. Meeting randoms or others isn’t, that’s why I’m not doing it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm desperately sorry I need to eat. My mental health is suffering too. My unhappy arse is at home, limiting infection. I'm only going out for necessities. Unfortunately, survival means sacrifices must be made." True, I agree sacrifice for the greater good | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" And how will the vulnerable people get their shopping. Judging without thinking. Someone gets it for them and leaves it on their doorstep. Is that so hard a concept to grasp? You questioning me? On what? The fact the person was judging someone who is collecting shopping for vulnerable people? Yes you And what about me the fact I am sick and tired of people judging others? " I'm sorry that you and others are offended by the fact that you're undermining national and global public health. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I have more understanding than you care to comprehend. I've been isolated a very long time and I make sacrifices to have social interactions. When you sit alone 24hrs a day, day in day out for not weeks but years. Come back and tell me the face on a screen isn't dehumanizing. That you won't need the actual company of others just so you don't break completely." And that right there is you being a hypocrite yourself. Judging me, and my response. I have been isolated before, much more than a few weeks. So this interaction is now over and I shall leave you to your attempt at justifying your decisions. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds... you obviously know better than the proper advice I have been given from on high then...
I do that’s right I'll agree to disagree and in the meantime I shall carry on helping people because in these uncertain times I'd much rather keep busy doing something good than ideal and judgemental "Ignore those with judgement in their posts. The vulnerable need someone to help them and so you're doing a grand job. It's also good that in doing so you're helping keep your mental health on some sort of even keel. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" I do that’s right I'll agree to disagree and in the meantime I shall carry on helping people because in these uncertain times I'd much rather keep busy doing something good than ideal and judgemental Your my hero, single handily saving us sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. Perhaps instead of being all judgey. Go see if one of your neighbours needs some shopping or help. Check online for the groups looking for volunteers. They have not yet said you cant maintain a physical relationship with someone as long as you are sticking to certain limitations. Yes but then you are seeing said person then seeing vulnerable how thick do you need to be lol " One person??? And you're judging. Yet the shops are filled with the virus from people sick who needed food but it's ok people gotta eat but be damned if you had company. People who still have to continue to work and you judge someone for seeing one fucking person! Can you not see how ridiculous the judgements are. People are indirectly having contact with 100s of people but God the world's going to end because someone has been in contact with one person. Fine couples living together will have to separate one needs to move out, kids will have to leave the home because by this reasoning no one can be within 2m of each other. You can't share the same space with another. Yeah you can't go see your partner it's too dangerous but it's all ok you can go shopping it's all safe there | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? If I want human connection I see a friend from a safe distance. Or FaceTime
There really have never been so many ways to connect with people from distance as there is now
Will see how long people last who have never been isolated before. These means of connecting to others digitally won't be the same as actual human interaction. You'll discover its dehumanizing
It is not dehumanising. I've been through it before, with less digital social options than we have now. It is a huge advantage that we have and you are greatly underestimating and undervaluing it.
The 2 things that digital can not fully help with are distance from loved ones. It is not "people" that we crave interaction from but specific people that we are familiar with. Not being around family, a mother or father away from their children etc.
The other being physical interaction, this however is partially connected to the above, but also is less about physically interacting with people but just a desire for sexual instinct. One that is quite easily suppressed with a little effort.
Hell lots of men on here have been sexually isolated for much longer than what is currently being asked during this global situation.
You have an issue with people judging you, but you have no problem dismissing and undervaluing an extremely important lifeline that has saved so many lives. A very important lifeline that you clearly do not understand. "True, some of us men on here have been sexually isolated for many years. The virus has made no difference to our circumstances. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I dont think people are hypocrites but I do think some are being very judgemental. I will continue to see my long term fwb as already I'm anxious about the social distancing. I have also volunteered to help for some of my local people that cant get out and about and some people on lockdown because it keeps me busy and gives me purpose. I know I am much more at risk while out shopping for hours than I am visiting one person who is basically in isolation apart from seeing me. Yet I've been called selfish and deluded. Mental health is being talked about but I still fear the way we are curbing the spread will ultimately take more lives than the virus itself x So you are still socialising then in contact with vulnerable people ? no I'm not socialising. I'm doing essential shopping for people who cant go out and seeing my long term fwb who we have actually discussed If we actually have something more and maybe should move him in. I dont really call shopping for 27 hour a week socialising. Hes self isolating because he now has no where to go. And his parents are over 70... his sister on the list of vulnerable people. You shouldn’t be doing all that if contact with vulnerable people, that’s how it spreads. It’s like sitting yourself in isolation all day then go out in crowds... you obviously know better than the proper advice I have been given from on high then...
I do that’s right I'll agree to disagree and in the meantime I shall carry on helping people because in these uncertain times I'd much rather keep busy doing something good than ideal and judgemental
Your my hero, single handily saving us "Your sarcasm and judgement, IMO, is out of order. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I’m more than happy to judge. I live on my own, have no family close by and am now working from home. I’m managing to get by on a supermarket trip at the most weekly and have observed self distancing protocols where possible. I accept that there is a chance I may contract it despite this, but if that happens I can control who I might give it to. Do I like having to live my life like this? Absolutely not but the sooner we’re all doing it the sooner there’s a chance this thing might be over and normal life can resume. I’ve accepted that my needs, wants and desires are secondary to those of the nation and for the time being I am not the most important person in my life. If youre one of the ones uncommon ones to be asymptomatic then you've been in a supermarket. How is that controlling it. How is going shopping less risky than meeting an individual in private? I need food to eat, it is a necessity. Meeting randoms or others isn’t, that’s why I’m not doing it. " But people aren't necessarily meeting random people and being judged yet you're ok with that? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your only sounding off because you've been having meets. I'm being judged as I always am. I'm judged for being a sexually liberated woman. I'm judged for trying to balance my mental health. People judging others when their actions are questionable also. Forced closure of clubs Friday and everything since people are judging it's amazing how people change. I have an evening with 2 fwbs and I'm treated with utter disdain. No one knows what goes on in my life or anyone else's but they sit here casting judgement and yet do not consider their own actions. No judgement from me.... We all have to make our own decisions...
People will make decisions based on their needs. I'm waiting in couple of weeks how many of these judgemental people will begin to meet again just to save their sanity. They will discover that digital connection isn't enough. "Or maybe hear that you or someone you met has a vulnerable relative who has contracted it and died as a result. There are many who as a result of meeting now display a disregard for others safety and may find it hard to get meets later when they find they're on many block lists. If one demonstrates such disregard with is that clearly has no vaccine and is killing thousands it could be easily rightly be assumed they have little regard for others sexual health too even in the better times. For me there's little difference. Behaviour is hard to change. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I work in the hospital, front line facing this virus at the moment. We are fully aware that in all probability we will end up catching it at some time. They are estimating that 30% of nhs will be off at any given point in time so as well as a huge influx of patients we will only have two thirds of the staff. The projected timescale of this outbreak is 12 to 18 months at the moment. All I can do is try to be as careful as I can. My hands are raw from scrubbing, my mind and nerves are shattered but hopefully when I get home after another crap shift with more deaths and infections I can spend some quality time with my immediate family and reflect on how lucky we are each and every day as we go on. There is no capacity to isolate the hospital staff with the infected within the hospital and as yet there is no reason. Things are changing daily though for all of us. Keep calm, stay safe, wash your bloody hands and stop moaning at each other." | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do you equate sex as the same level of necessity as food? Do you think most people meet on here to have an orgasm? Or do you think human connection is part of it? If I want human connection I see a friend from a safe distance. Or FaceTime
There really have never been so many ways to connect with people from distance as there is now
Will see how long people last who have never been isolated before. These means of connecting to others digitally won't be the same as actual human interaction. You'll discover its dehumanizing
It is not dehumanising. I've been through it before, with less digital social options than we have now. It is a huge advantage that we have and you are greatly underestimating and undervaluing it.
The 2 things that digital can not fully help with are distance from loved ones. It is not "people" that we crave interaction from but specific people that we are familiar with. Not being around family, a mother or father away from their children etc.
The other being physical interaction, this however is partially connected to the above, but also is less about physically interacting with people but just a desire for sexual instinct. One that is quite easily suppressed with a little effort.
Hell lots of men on here have been sexually isolated for much longer than what is currently being asked during this global situation.
You have an issue with people judging you, but you have no problem dismissing and undervaluing an extremely important lifeline that has saved so many lives. A very important lifeline that you clearly do not understand.
And you think I have family that I miss the attention of and that digital access will fix?
I have more understanding than you care to comprehend. I've been isolated a very long time and I make sacrifices to have social interactions.
When you sit alone 24hrs a day, day in day out for not weeks but years. Come back and tell me the face on a screen isn't dehumanizing. That you won't need the actual company of others just so you don't break completely.
If people like me were on here just for sex I'd lie here with my legs spread instead every day as fugly as I am I'd always have cock if I wanted just that. But it isn't about just sex. "Sadly many people judge by their own yardstick (which doesn't qualify them) and lack empathy. Your opening post is a good one but sadly won't be accepted by narrow-minded individuals. I, too, keep stating about the dangers of long standing high levels of cortisol... But I'm sure people would rather fuel this with their ongoing fear/stress/anger than help themselves with accepting things they cannot control. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your my hero, single handily saving us Your sarcasm and judgement, IMO, is out of order. " Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your only sounding off because you've been having meets. I'm being judged as I always am. I'm judged for being a sexually liberated woman. I'm judged for trying to balance my mental health. People judging others when their actions are questionable also. Forced closure of clubs Friday and everything since people are judging it's amazing how people change. I have an evening with 2 fwbs and I'm treated with utter disdain. No one knows what goes on in my life or anyone else's but they sit here casting judgement and yet do not consider their own actions. No judgement from me.... We all have to make our own decisions...
People will make decisions based on their needs. I'm waiting in couple of weeks how many of these judgemental people will begin to meet again just to save their sanity. They will discover that digital connection isn't enough.
Or maybe hear that you or someone you met has a vulnerable relative who has contracted it and died as a result.
There are many who as a result of meeting now display a disregard for others safety and may find it hard to get meets later when they find they're on many block lists. If one demonstrates such disregard with is that clearly has no vaccine and is killing thousands it could be easily rightly be assumed they have little regard for others sexual health too even in the better times.
For me there's little difference. Behaviour is hard to change."For me complete isolation or the virus during this pandemic will be the death of me. So in order for me to survive I see a fwb which isn't just about sex! I'm judged for trying to make sure I survive. It's not like I'm meeting complete strangers, I'm not having gangbangs with every Tom dick and Harry, I'm not throwing parties. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I’m more than happy to judge. I live on my own, have no family close by and am now working from home. I’m managing to get by on a supermarket trip at the most weekly and have observed self distancing protocols where possible. I accept that there is a chance I may contract it despite this, but if that happens I can control who I might give it to. Do I like having to live my life like this? Absolutely not but the sooner we’re all doing it the sooner there’s a chance this thing might be over and normal life can resume. I’ve accepted that my needs, wants and desires are secondary to those of the nation and for the time being I am not the most important person in my life. If youre one of the ones uncommon ones to be asymptomatic then you've been in a supermarket. How is that controlling it. How is going shopping less risky than meeting an individual in private? I need food to eat, it is a necessity. Meeting randoms or others isn’t, that’s why I’m not doing it. But people aren't necessarily meeting random people and being judged yet you're ok with that?" I’m more than ok with that. As far as I’m concerned anyone who doesn’t live under the same roof as me is a random person right now and I do all I can to avoid contact. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends." Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about" I'm leaving the house to grocery shop in order to *survive*. I'm sorry I have a physiological need for nutrition that means I can't avoid people. Apart from that I'm not leaving the house. At all. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" I do that’s right I'll agree to disagree and in the meantime I shall carry on helping people because in these uncertain times I'd much rather keep busy doing something good than ideal and judgemental Your my hero, single handily saving us sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. Perhaps instead of being all judgey. Go see if one of your neighbours needs some shopping or help. Check online for the groups looking for volunteers. They have not yet said you cant maintain a physical relationship with someone as long as you are sticking to certain limitations. Yes but then you are seeing said person then seeing vulnerable how thick do you need to be lol " please dont get a nose bleed up there on your lofty pedestal...I am not doing anything against the current guidelines... and I'm going to Carry on helping people.. actually my job is putting people more at risk than anything else. How is seeing one person that is only seeing me putting the people I'm helping a risk... To put it basically... I see my fwb ( who to be fair is more my partner than a fwb anyway) who due to his isolated situation ( he is not isolated due to being vulnerable just because of his social situation) he sees me and who ever he has contact with in a shop etx I have my family ... my clients ( who vary in mental capacity whom If I dont pop in and see will see no one during this time. We have been told what to do.. we have been advised from upon high and all accepted that by carrying on working to help these people we are a little more at risk. I also am doing shopping runs for local people who cant go out. I'm getting bank transfers and shopping for them..dropping it at their doors. And I'm thick for following guidelines? I'm not going to carry on trying to explain basics to you as obviously the altitude up there on your high horse is affecting basic understanding. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about" But you know that isnt doable!! We all need food We can only minimise risk by having as little physical interaction as possible We cannot eliminate it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about But you know that isnt doable!! We all need food We can only minimise risk by having as little physical interaction as possible We cannot eliminate it" Honestly, I think some people don't understand risk minimisation. "What I'm doing is fine and if you have a problem then you need to starve to death"  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about I'm leaving the house to grocery shop in order to *survive*. I'm sorry I have a physiological need for nutrition that means I can't avoid people. Apart from that I'm not leaving the house. At all." Be concerned with your own needs. Allow others to be concerned with theirs. Judging another for seeing someone when you are yourself joining others on a larger scale in public areas do you not see the hypocrisy in it. I've not been food shopping in 2 weeks and I only spent £60 before that was a month. I don't have food stocked I can't afford to bulk buy. I will have to brave the shops somehow. But I do know the shops are more riskier than seeing an individual. I have to get taxi for shopping whose to say the driver isn't sick, then I have to collect what I can which I doubt is very little left. Which is expensive given the fact it would probably take multiple trips to get what I need. Have to get to check out with goods I'd wish to purchase and there's the cashier. Who isn't 2m away and touched everything you've just touched and is breathing in your direction. Then it's hand over cash and hope I can pay exactly because the change is contaminated. Pay by card I have to touch the card machine. All of this while walking round a store where people have coughed and spluttered, picked up items, put them back, opened freezer doors. Imagine how many points of indirect contact have been made just from shopping with how many people that day. Then have get taxi home. But having physical contact with a person I must be mad eh? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about I'm leaving the house to grocery shop in order to *survive*. I'm sorry I have a physiological need for nutrition that means I can't avoid people. Apart from that I'm not leaving the house. At all. Be concerned with your own needs. Allow others to be concerned with theirs. Judging another for seeing someone when you are yourself joining others on a larger scale in public areas do you not see the hypocrisy in it. I've not been food shopping in 2 weeks and I only spent £60 before that was a month. I don't have food stocked I can't afford to bulk buy. I will have to brave the shops somehow. But I do know the shops are more riskier than seeing an individual. I have to get taxi for shopping whose to say the driver isn't sick, then I have to collect what I can which I doubt is very little left. Which is expensive given the fact it would probably take multiple trips to get what I need. Have to get to check out with goods I'd wish to purchase and there's the cashier. Who isn't 2m away and touched everything you've just touched and is breathing in your direction. Then it's hand over cash and hope I can pay exactly because the change is contaminated. Pay by card I have to touch the card machine. All of this while walking round a store where people have coughed and spluttered, picked up items, put them back, opened freezer doors. Imagine how many points of indirect contact have been made just from shopping with how many people that day. Then have get taxi home. But having physical contact with a person I must be mad eh?" Meeting anyone socially right now is irresponsible. Period. In a normal situation, do what you like. In a public health emergency, letting people do what they feel is best will cost lives. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I think society today is paying the price for breeding a whole generation of selfish fuckers who hold too much sway over everyone else,they shout the loudest when they can't get their own way and claim either prejudice or being offended. Yet are also the first one's to start throwing stones and criticising others. People are spoilt brats these day's and if I'm honest none of these selfish me first attitudes surprises me. The world is imploding and all people care about is getting their end's away! Shame , shame, shame......." You want to talk about selfish? It wouldn't have got to this point of a pandemic here if people had the support in the beginning. Greedy bastards sitting on their coffers. People forced to work or lose their income while sick. If people weren't so selfish and greedy in the first place we wouldn't be in this situation and that's a fact! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about I'm leaving the house to grocery shop in order to *survive*. I'm sorry I have a physiological need for nutrition that means I can't avoid people. Apart from that I'm not leaving the house. At all. Be concerned with your own needs. Allow others to be concerned with theirs. Judging another for seeing someone when you are yourself joining others on a larger scale in public areas do you not see the hypocrisy in it. I've not been food shopping in 2 weeks and I only spent £60 before that was a month. I don't have food stocked I can't afford to bulk buy. I will have to brave the shops somehow. But I do know the shops are more riskier than seeing an individual. I have to get taxi for shopping whose to say the driver isn't sick, then I have to collect what I can which I doubt is very little left. Which is expensive given the fact it would probably take multiple trips to get what I need. Have to get to check out with goods I'd wish to purchase and there's the cashier. Who isn't 2m away and touched everything you've just touched and is breathing in your direction. Then it's hand over cash and hope I can pay exactly because the change is contaminated. Pay by card I have to touch the card machine. All of this while walking round a store where people have coughed and spluttered, picked up items, put them back, opened freezer doors. Imagine how many points of indirect contact have been made just from shopping with how many people that day. Then have get taxi home. But having physical contact with a person I must be mad eh? Meeting anyone socially right now is irresponsible. Period. In a normal situation, do what you like. In a public health emergency, letting people do what they feel is best will cost lives." If someone you know in coming months commits suicide from the isolation I'm sure those judgments will resonate within you for a long time. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about I'm leaving the house to grocery shop in order to *survive*. I'm sorry I have a physiological need for nutrition that means I can't avoid people. Apart from that I'm not leaving the house. At all. Be concerned with your own needs. Allow others to be concerned with theirs. Judging another for seeing someone when you are yourself joining others on a larger scale in public areas do you not see the hypocrisy in it. I've not been food shopping in 2 weeks and I only spent £60 before that was a month. I don't have food stocked I can't afford to bulk buy. I will have to brave the shops somehow. But I do know the shops are more riskier than seeing an individual. I have to get taxi for shopping whose to say the driver isn't sick, then I have to collect what I can which I doubt is very little left. Which is expensive given the fact it would probably take multiple trips to get what I need. Have to get to check out with goods I'd wish to purchase and there's the cashier. Who isn't 2m away and touched everything you've just touched and is breathing in your direction. Then it's hand over cash and hope I can pay exactly because the change is contaminated. Pay by card I have to touch the card machine. All of this while walking round a store where people have coughed and spluttered, picked up items, put them back, opened freezer doors. Imagine how many points of indirect contact have been made just from shopping with how many people that day. Then have get taxi home. But having physical contact with a person I must be mad eh? Meeting anyone socially right now is irresponsible. Period. In a normal situation, do what you like. In a public health emergency, letting people do what they feel is best will cost lives. If someone you know in coming months commits suicide from the isolation I'm sure those judgments will resonate within you for a long time. " As someone who's at risk for suicide myself, don't you dare. Manage your mental health. Not at the expense of public health. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about I'm leaving the house to grocery shop in order to *survive*. I'm sorry I have a physiological need for nutrition that means I can't avoid people. Apart from that I'm not leaving the house. At all. Be concerned with your own needs. Allow others to be concerned with theirs. Judging another for seeing someone when you are yourself joining others on a larger scale in public areas do you not see the hypocrisy in it. I've not been food shopping in 2 weeks and I only spent £60 before that was a month. I don't have food stocked I can't afford to bulk buy. I will have to brave the shops somehow. But I do know the shops are more riskier than seeing an individual. I have to get taxi for shopping whose to say the driver isn't sick, then I have to collect what I can which I doubt is very little left. Which is expensive given the fact it would probably take multiple trips to get what I need. Have to get to check out with goods I'd wish to purchase and there's the cashier. Who isn't 2m away and touched everything you've just touched and is breathing in your direction. Then it's hand over cash and hope I can pay exactly because the change is contaminated. Pay by card I have to touch the card machine. All of this while walking round a store where people have coughed and spluttered, picked up items, put them back, opened freezer doors. Imagine how many points of indirect contact have been made just from shopping with how many people that day. Then have get taxi home. But having physical contact with a person I must be mad eh? Meeting anyone socially right now is irresponsible. Period. In a normal situation, do what you like. In a public health emergency, letting people do what they feel is best will cost lives. If someone you know in coming months commits suicide from the isolation I'm sure those judgments will resonate within you for a long time. As someone who's at risk for suicide myself, don't you dare. Manage your mental health. Not at the expense of public health." You cast judgements but you have no consideration to another's mental health. So I dare say it. You look after you let others look after themselves your judgement is not necessary. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about I'm leaving the house to grocery shop in order to *survive*. I'm sorry I have a physiological need for nutrition that means I can't avoid people. Apart from that I'm not leaving the house. At all. Be concerned with your own needs. Allow others to be concerned with theirs. Judging another for seeing someone when you are yourself joining others on a larger scale in public areas do you not see the hypocrisy in it. I've not been food shopping in 2 weeks and I only spent £60 before that was a month. I don't have food stocked I can't afford to bulk buy. I will have to brave the shops somehow. But I do know the shops are more riskier than seeing an individual. I have to get taxi for shopping whose to say the driver isn't sick, then I have to collect what I can which I doubt is very little left. Which is expensive given the fact it would probably take multiple trips to get what I need. Have to get to check out with goods I'd wish to purchase and there's the cashier. Who isn't 2m away and touched everything you've just touched and is breathing in your direction. Then it's hand over cash and hope I can pay exactly because the change is contaminated. Pay by card I have to touch the card machine. All of this while walking round a store where people have coughed and spluttered, picked up items, put them back, opened freezer doors. Imagine how many points of indirect contact have been made just from shopping with how many people that day. Then have get taxi home. But having physical contact with a person I must be mad eh? Meeting anyone socially right now is irresponsible. Period. In a normal situation, do what you like. In a public health emergency, letting people do what they feel is best will cost lives. If someone you know in coming months commits suicide from the isolation I'm sure those judgments will resonate within you for a long time. As someone who's at risk for suicide myself, don't you dare. Manage your mental health. Not at the expense of public health. You cast judgements but you have no consideration to another's mental health. So I dare say it. You look after you let others look after themselves your judgement is not necessary." This is where the whole problem is,it's not about everyone looking after themselves!!!! It's about everyone looking after each other. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about I'm leaving the house to grocery shop in order to *survive*. I'm sorry I have a physiological need for nutrition that means I can't avoid people. Apart from that I'm not leaving the house. At all. Be concerned with your own needs. Allow others to be concerned with theirs. Judging another for seeing someone when you are yourself joining others on a larger scale in public areas do you not see the hypocrisy in it. I've not been food shopping in 2 weeks and I only spent £60 before that was a month. I don't have food stocked I can't afford to bulk buy. I will have to brave the shops somehow. But I do know the shops are more riskier than seeing an individual. I have to get taxi for shopping whose to say the driver isn't sick, then I have to collect what I can which I doubt is very little left. Which is expensive given the fact it would probably take multiple trips to get what I need. Have to get to check out with goods I'd wish to purchase and there's the cashier. Who isn't 2m away and touched everything you've just touched and is breathing in your direction. Then it's hand over cash and hope I can pay exactly because the change is contaminated. Pay by card I have to touch the card machine. All of this while walking round a store where people have coughed and spluttered, picked up items, put them back, opened freezer doors. Imagine how many points of indirect contact have been made just from shopping with how many people that day. Then have get taxi home. But having physical contact with a person I must be mad eh? Meeting anyone socially right now is irresponsible. Period. In a normal situation, do what you like. In a public health emergency, letting people do what they feel is best will cost lives. If someone you know in coming months commits suicide from the isolation I'm sure those judgments will resonate within you for a long time. As someone who's at risk for suicide myself, don't you dare. Manage your mental health. Not at the expense of public health. You cast judgements but you have no consideration to another's mental health. So I dare say it. You look after you let others look after themselves your judgement is not necessary." Public health is not an individual problem with individual choices. Your actions will help transmit disease needlessly. This disease kills. There are other ways to manage your mental health. Do so. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most people would regard being able to feed yourself for a week to be essential. Many people would not look at a bukkake party (for example) as essential. So one might be more risky than the other, but one might also be more necessary than the other. Of course, if you feel your plans were absolutely essential then do what you need to do." Individual need for social contact I don't think extends to bukkake parties. It's a gathering of many people which of course is not minimising spread. That would be irresponsible. But is individuals who are not sick meeting more dangerous than going shopping? No it is not. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm absolutely judging. I'll judge all day long. Meeting anyone at the moment is a bad idea. We're all in this together and *everyone* needs to at a minimum keep away from others unless absolutely necessary. All others. Even friends. Then don't leave your house what so ever. Indirect contact is what people need to worry about I'm leaving the house to grocery shop in order to *survive*. I'm sorry I have a physiological need for nutrition that means I can't avoid people. Apart from that I'm not leaving the house. At all. Be concerned with your own needs. Allow others to be concerned with theirs. Judging another for seeing someone when you are yourself joining others on a larger scale in public areas do you not see the hypocrisy in it. I've not been food shopping in 2 weeks and I only spent £60 before that was a month. I don't have food stocked I can't afford to bulk buy. I will have to brave the shops somehow. But I do know the shops are more riskier than seeing an individual. I have to get taxi for shopping whose to say the driver isn't sick, then I have to collect what I can which I doubt is very little left. Which is expensive given the fact it would probably take multiple trips to get what I need. Have to get to check out with goods I'd wish to purchase and there's the cashier. Who isn't 2m away and touched everything you've just touched and is breathing in your direction. Then it's hand over cash and hope I can pay exactly because the change is contaminated. Pay by card I have to touch the card machine. All of this while walking round a store where people have coughed and spluttered, picked up items, put them back, opened freezer doors. Imagine how many points of indirect contact have been made just from shopping with how many people that day. Then have get taxi home. But having physical contact with a person I must be mad eh? Meeting anyone socially right now is irresponsible. Period. In a normal situation, do what you like. In a public health emergency, letting people do what they feel is best will cost lives. If someone you know in coming months commits suicide from the isolation I'm sure those judgments will resonate within you for a long time. As someone who's at risk for suicide myself, don't you dare. Manage your mental health. Not at the expense of public health. You cast judgements but you have no consideration to another's mental health. So I dare say it. You look after you let others look after themselves your judgement is not necessary. This is where the whole problem is,it's not about everyone looking after themselves!!!! It's about everyone looking after each other." You don't think 2 people supporting each others mental well being is looking after another? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most people would regard being able to feed yourself for a week to be essential. Many people would not look at a bukkake party (for example) as essential. So one might be more risky than the other, but one might also be more necessary than the other. Of course, if you feel your plans were absolutely essential then do what you need to do. Individual need for social contact I don't think extends to bukkake parties. It's a gathering of many people which of course is not minimising spread. That would be irresponsible. But is individuals who are not sick meeting more dangerous than going shopping? No it is not. " No, but shopping is *necessary*. We need to eat. And asymptomatic transmission is a thing. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"And this coming from someone criticising me for not having a sexual testing. The thread title is suitable." Yet you don't have a problem with people having sex and not getting tested but have a problem when someone meets another for social contact to maintain mental balance *golfclap* | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most people would regard being able to feed yourself for a week to be essential. Many people would not look at a bukkake party (for example) as essential. So one might be more risky than the other, but one might also be more necessary than the other. Of course, if you feel your plans were absolutely essential then do what you need to do. Individual need for social contact I don't think extends to bukkake parties. It's a gathering of many people which of course is not minimising spread. That would be irresponsible. But is individuals who are not sick meeting more dangerous than going shopping? No it is not. " It’s an inessential risk at a time when no one actually knows whether they are sick. I understand the need to socialise but there are so many ways of doing that now: not least, the chat rooms on here | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most people would regard being able to feed yourself for a week to be essential. Many people would not look at a bukkake party (for example) as essential. So one might be more risky than the other, but one might also be more necessary than the other. Of course, if you feel your plans were absolutely essential then do what you need to do. Individual need for social contact I don't think extends to bukkake parties. It's a gathering of many people which of course is not minimising spread. That would be irresponsible. But is individuals who are not sick meeting more dangerous than going shopping? No it is not. It’s an inessential risk at a time when no one actually knows whether they are sick. I understand the need to socialise but there are so many ways of doing that now: not least, the chat rooms on here" The chatrooms on here hahahaha Isolation means more guys making demands of women over the chatrooms. Which is no good for mental well-being being treated like you're there for their pleasures. Chatrooms will not be the ideal place at all. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most people would regard being able to feed yourself for a week to be essential. Many people would not look at a bukkake party (for example) as essential. So one might be more risky than the other, but one might also be more necessary than the other. Of course, if you feel your plans were absolutely essential then do what you need to do. Individual need for social contact I don't think extends to bukkake parties. It's a gathering of many people which of course is not minimising spread. That would be irresponsible. But is individuals who are not sick meeting more dangerous than going shopping? No it is not. It’s an inessential risk at a time when no one actually knows whether they are sick. I understand the need to socialise but there are so many ways of doing that now: not least, the chat rooms on here The chatrooms on here hahahaha Isolation means more guys making demands of women over the chatrooms. Which is no good for mental well-being being treated like you're there for their pleasures. Chatrooms will not be the ideal place at all." Well fine but everyone has the capacity to video call these days | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most people would regard being able to feed yourself for a week to be essential. Many people would not look at a bukkake party (for example) as essential. So one might be more risky than the other, but one might also be more necessary than the other. Of course, if you feel your plans were absolutely essential then do what you need to do. Individual need for social contact I don't think extends to bukkake parties. It's a gathering of many people which of course is not minimising spread. That would be irresponsible. But is individuals who are not sick meeting more dangerous than going shopping? No it is not. No, but shopping is *necessary*. We need to eat. And asymptomatic transmission is a thing. " For some people social contact is necessary too. Especially for those who don't have family and friends. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" You cast judgements but you have no consideration to another's mental health. So I dare say it. You look after you let others look after themselves your judgement is not necessary." The thing is though it's not as simple as that is it? The actions of others potentially *do* impact me and my family in this current situation - whether that be by going shopping unnecessarily, going to Brighton for the day because it's sunny, or not being able to keep their sex life in check - by taking those risks, they potentially catch COVID and pass it on to me or my family some of whom are high risk and would probably die if they catch it. So I'll stand in judgement of *anyone* taking unnecessary risks through pure selfishness and neediness, regardless of the activity. We all have to eat to survive, so trips to the supermarket are necessary but should be limited to *only* when necessary. Any other activity pretty much is unnecessary to survival and therefore should be avoided and if you are undertaking *any* of them you're being both selfish and irresponsible in my book. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most people would regard being able to feed yourself for a week to be essential. Many people would not look at a bukkake party (for example) as essential. So one might be more risky than the other, but one might also be more necessary than the other. Of course, if you feel your plans were absolutely essential then do what you need to do." Hurray no judgement. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your only sounding off because you've been having meets. I'm being judged as I always am. I'm judged for being a sexually liberated woman. I'm judged for trying to balance my mental health. People judging others when their actions are questionable also. Forced closure of clubs Friday and everything since people are judging it's amazing how people change. I have an evening with 2 fwbs and I'm treated with utter disdain. No one knows what goes on in my life or anyone else's but they sit here casting judgement and yet do not consider their own actions. No judgement from me.... We all have to make our own decisions...
People will make decisions based on their needs. I'm waiting in couple of weeks how many of these judgemental people will begin to meet again just to save their sanity. They will discover that digital connection isn't enough.
Or maybe hear that you or someone you met has a vulnerable relative who has contracted it and died as a result.
There are many who as a result of meeting now display a disregard for others safety and may find it hard to get meets later when they find they're on many block lists. If one demonstrates such disregard with is that clearly has no vaccine and is killing thousands it could be easily rightly be assumed they have little regard for others sexual health too even in the better times.
For me there's little difference. Behaviour is hard to change.
For me complete isolation or the virus during this pandemic will be the death of me. So in order for me to survive I see a fwb which isn't just about sex! I'm judged for trying to make sure I survive. It's not like I'm meeting complete strangers, I'm not having gangbangs with every Tom dick and Harry, I'm not throwing parties.
"Guess adding a third person for last meet was essential. 
Each to their own I guess. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"... Think before you cast judgement" Indeed I will, however, it looks like you had a meet at the weekend. Please correct me if I'm wrong. How do you reconcile that? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"And this coming from someone criticising me for not having a sexual testing. The thread title is suitable. Yet you don't have a problem with people having sex and not getting tested but have a problem when someone meets another for social contact to maintain mental balance *golfclap*" No I don't have a problem with someone not being tested after only having sex once in their lives many years ago with a fellow virgin (safe sex). But you carry on with your reckless behaviour
This thread is so well titled.
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Going to the supermarket to buy essential items and food isn’t the same as having a one on one meet with someone which will obviously involve physical contact. In the shops today I whizzed round and had surgical gloves on, didn’t touch my face didn’t linger or go too close to anyone. Was in and out used hand sanitiser when I got in my car and washed my hands when I got home. " We can't get online delivery from any supermarket here, even though I technically qualify as priority through being physically disabled. Ocado is our regular option but the website is down. Sainsbury's and Tesco etc are not accepting new registration. How do you get food without going to the shops? Obviously you go quickly, get what you need only and scarper quickly. I'm also shop for mates of mine who are more disabled, live alone and also can't get online delivery. One mate should be in the 1.5m extra vulnerable people but he's had nothing. Do I leave him to starve? No, I'm going to the fucking shop for him, OK. But I'm certainly not meeting randomers off the Internet for sex! It's got nothing to do with being liberated, it's got everything to do with common sense and supporting the greater good! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Going to the supermarket to buy essential items and food isn’t the same as having a one on one meet with someone which will obviously involve physical contact. In the shops today I whizzed round and had surgical gloves on, didn’t touch my face didn’t linger or go too close to anyone. Was in and out used hand sanitiser when I got in my car and washed my hands when I got home. We can't get online delivery from any supermarket here, even though I technically qualify as priority through being physically disabled. Ocado is our regular option but the website is down. Sainsbury's and Tesco etc are not accepting new registration. How do you get food without going to the shops? Obviously you go quickly, get what you need only and scarper quickly. I'm also shop for mates of mine who are more disabled, live alone and also can't get online delivery. One mate should be in the 1.5m extra vulnerable people but he's had nothing. Do I leave him to starve? No, I'm going to the fucking shop for him, OK. But I'm certainly not meeting randomers off the Internet for sex! It's got nothing to do with being liberated, it's got everything to do with common sense and supporting the greater good! " The greater good! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your only sounding off because you've been having meets. I'm being judged as I always am. I'm judged for being a sexually liberated woman. I'm judged for trying to balance my mental health. People judging others when their actions are questionable also. Forced closure of clubs Friday and everything since people are judging it's amazing how people change. I have an evening with 2 fwbs and I'm treated with utter disdain. No one knows what goes on in my life or anyone else's but they sit here casting judgement and yet do not consider their own actions. No judgement from me.... We all have to make our own decisions...
People will make decisions based on their needs. I'm waiting in couple of weeks how many of these judgemental people will begin to meet again just to save their sanity. They will discover that digital connection isn't enough.
Or maybe hear that you or someone you met has a vulnerable relative who has contracted it and died as a result.
There are many who as a result of meeting now display a disregard for others safety and may find it hard to get meets later when they find they're on many block lists. If one demonstrates such disregard with is that clearly has no vaccine and is killing thousands it could be easily rightly be assumed they have little regard for others sexual health too even in the better times.
For me there's little difference. Behaviour is hard to change.
For me complete isolation or the virus during this pandemic will be the death of me. So in order for me to survive I see a fwb which isn't just about sex! I'm judged for trying to make sure I survive. It's not like I'm meeting complete strangers, I'm not having gangbangs with every Tom dick and Harry, I'm not throwing parties.
Guess adding a third person for last meet was essential.
Each to their own I guess."Of course the third person was essential, I'm suprised it wasn't a gangbang! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"... Think before you cast judgement Indeed I will, however, it looks like you had a meet at the weekend. Please correct me if I'm wrong. How do you reconcile that?" More than one looking at the veris...and one was a MMF  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"From someone who works in mental health and am still working at this moment in time I feel that communication and human interaction at a distance is the way forward .... don’t think having sex comes under that !!!!" Why is it people keep thinking it's all about sex? Just because it's a swingers site doesn't meant every single thing a person does is sex!! What to know my week, Monday - alone, Tuesday - alone, Wednesday - nipped shop said hi how are you then paid for my stuff, rest of the time alone. Thursday - alone, Friday - went for tea with fwb and watched movies, other fwb arrived chatted watched some music vids, had some sexual fun, chatted some more played on games console. Watched another movie went to bed. Saturday got up watched some vids and chatted then I went home. Without that social interaction I would spiral further into my issues. My physical health and my mental health are a cycle of misery. So if spending some quality time with someone so I don't kill myself is well worth it. Guess how my weekends been? I'm told I'm irresponsible, I'm wrong, I'm the cause of the spread, that basically I should tough it out its ok if I don't survive because no one cares anyway. That I'm not worthy as a person to take care of my needs. Because everyone else matters more. So guess how I fucking feel now? And there's no one here to support me. But you all think it's ok to carry on ignore information but make judgements even though what I've done is no more causing risk than each of you. Think about what your judgements are doing to others. It's amazing how I'm judged from Friday when people were still in the pubs till closing. That my decision Friday I'm treated with utter contempt, that people are treating others the same. All the be kind and now this people lose their compassion and empathy if they ever had it before. I'm a high risk so much so it could only take a common cold virus to kill me. I know the risks every time I leave my door and everytime I meet someone in the street or at the shop. Every time I choose someone to be a sexual partner. I put trust in people not to give me any bug not just covid19. I don't want to die I want to live. But if that means every now and then I need social contact il do just that. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Going to the supermarket to buy essential items and food isn’t the same as having a one on one meet with someone which will obviously involve physical contact. In the shops today I whizzed round and had surgical gloves on, didn’t touch my face didn’t linger or go too close to anyone. Was in and out used hand sanitiser when I got in my car and washed my hands when I got home. We can't get online delivery from any supermarket here, even though I technically qualify as priority through being physically disabled. Ocado is our regular option but the website is down. Sainsbury's and Tesco etc are not accepting new registration. How do you get food without going to the shops? Obviously you go quickly, get what you need only and scarper quickly. I'm also shop for mates of mine who are more disabled, live alone and also can't get online delivery. One mate should be in the 1.5m extra vulnerable people but he's had nothing. Do I leave him to starve? No, I'm going to the fucking shop for him, OK. But I'm certainly not meeting randomers off the Internet for sex! It's got nothing to do with being liberated, it's got everything to do with common sense and supporting the greater good! The greater good! "I'll now be watching Hot Fuzz while in Lockdown | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"... Think before you cast judgement Indeed I will, however, it looks like you had a meet at the weekend. Please correct me if I'm wrong. How do you reconcile that? More than one looking at the veris...and one was a MMF "Please feel free to see my previous post | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"... Think before you cast judgement Indeed I will, however, it looks like you had a meet at the weekend. Please correct me if I'm wrong. How do you reconcile that?" I'm not judging anyone whose meeting .... I don't have to reconcile with that at all | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"It's got nothing to do with being liberated, it's got everything to do with common sense and supporting the greater good! The greater good!
I'll now be watching Hot Fuzz while in Lockdown "Ah yes! Glad somebody got it. I'm watching the entire corneto trilogy tonight  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"If you run out of food you can always eat your high horse " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Going to the supermarket to buy essential items and food isn’t the same as having a one on one meet with someone which will obviously involve physical contact. In the shops today I whizzed round and had surgical gloves on, didn’t touch my face didn’t linger or go too close to anyone. Was in and out used hand sanitiser when I got in my car and washed my hands when I got home. We can't get online delivery from any supermarket here, even though I technically qualify as priority through being physically disabled. Ocado is our regular option but the website is down. Sainsbury's and Tesco etc are not accepting new registration. How do you get food without going to the shops? Obviously you go quickly, get what you need only and scarper quickly. I'm also shop for mates of mine who are more disabled, live alone and also can't get online delivery. One mate should be in the 1.5m extra vulnerable people but he's had nothing. Do I leave him to starve? No, I'm going to the fucking shop for him, OK. But I'm certainly not meeting randomers off the Internet for sex! It's got nothing to do with being liberated, it's got everything to do with common sense and supporting the greater good! " Why does it sound like you’re having a go at me? I said having a one on one meet where physical contact is involved isn’t the same as nipping round a shop to get essential items. Meaning you need the essential items, you don’t need the one on one meet. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" We can't get online delivery from any supermarket here, even though I technically qualify as priority through being physically disabled. Ocado is our regular option but the website is down. Sainsbury's and Tesco etc are not accepting new registration. How do you get food without going to the shops? Obviously you go quickly, get what you need only and scarper quickly. I'm also shop for mates of mine who are more disabled, live alone and also can't get online delivery. One mate should be in the 1.5m extra vulnerable people but he's had nothing. Do I leave him to starve? No, I'm going to the fucking shop for him, OK. But I'm certainly not meeting randomers off the Internet for sex! It's got nothing to do with being liberated, it's got everything to do with common sense and supporting the greater good! " Has your Local Authority got a community hub you can register on? Might be worth checking, you tick what your needs are and then they know you might need someone to shop for you and deliver to your doorstep. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I am backing out of this thread before I really let rip and get myself banned. Bye." But! How selfish of you, not making a sacrifice for those of us in need of entertainment.   | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"If you run out of food you can always eat your high horse " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I am backing out of this thread before I really let rip and get myself banned. Bye." You'll only get banned if it's a smelly one, a silent but deadly. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"From someone who works in mental health and am still working at this moment in time I feel that communication and human interaction at a distance is the way forward .... don’t think having sex comes under that !!!! Why is it people keep thinking it's all about sex? Just because it's a swingers site doesn't meant every single thing a person does is sex!! What to know my week, Monday - alone, Tuesday - alone, Wednesday - nipped shop said hi how are you then paid for my stuff, rest of the time alone. Thursday - alone, Friday - went for tea with fwb and watched movies, other fwb arrived chatted watched some music vids, had some sexual fun, chatted some more played on games console. Watched another movie went to bed. Saturday got up watched some vids and chatted then I went home. Without that social interaction I would spiral further into my issues. My physical health and my mental health are a cycle of misery. So if spending some quality time with someone so I don't kill myself is well worth it. Guess how my weekends been? I'm told I'm irresponsible, I'm wrong, I'm the cause of the spread, that basically I should tough it out its ok if I don't survive because no one cares anyway. That I'm not worthy as a person to take care of my needs. Because everyone else matters more. So guess how I fucking feel now? And there's no one here to support me. But you all think it's ok to carry on ignore information but make judgements even though what I've done is no more causing risk than each of you. Think about what your judgements are doing to others. It's amazing how I'm judged from Friday when people were still in the pubs till closing. That my decision Friday I'm treated with utter contempt, that people are treating others the same. All the be kind and now this people lose their compassion and empathy if they ever had it before. I'm a high risk so much so it could only take a common cold virus to kill me. I know the risks every time I leave my door and everytime I meet someone in the street or at the shop. Every time I choose someone to be a sexual partner. I put trust in people not to give me any bug not just covid19. I don't want to die I want to live. But if that means every now and then I need social contact il do just that. "  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. " So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. " But threesomes are an essential necessity! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established" As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"These types of threads day in day out, are going to play a massive part on your mind. The disagreements are never going to be resolved. Learn to let it go, walk away from the site and do something to take your minds off of it.... These are going to be long weeks ahead...... " This. We all need to look after our mental well-being. If something bothers you, take some time away. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? " Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? " Is the bukkake still on for this Friday? Going to be a full bus coming. All for social interaction of course | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now." I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Is the bukkake still on for this Friday? Going to be a full bus coming. All for social interaction of course " I'm sure you can organise one for yourself. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"The hospital I work in is filling up with sick and dying people that got infected by someone who thought their need for social interaction is more important than other people’s lives. I don’t have a choice, I’m needed at work. I’m getting groceries using click and collect. I’m lonely, scared and need a bunk up. I cry sometimes. I will not be meeting though. Because i worry about the impact that may have on society. "
Blessings upon you and big hugs and a virtual bunk up being sent to you xx | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19." You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"The hospital I work in is filling up with sick and dying people that got infected by someone who thought their need for social interaction is more important than other people’s lives. I don’t have a choice, I’m needed at work. I’m getting groceries using click and collect. I’m lonely, scared and need a bunk up. I cry sometimes. I will not be meeting though. Because i worry about the impact that may have on society. " It's filling up because safety wasn't a concern for the government. If they closed all methods of travel into the country Britain wouldn't be in this position. Instead they allowed travellers to return home from infected areas. Because they were going to offer support should they remain where they were. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"The hospital I work in is filling up with sick and dying people that got infected by someone who thought their need for social interaction is more important than other people’s lives. I don’t have a choice, I’m needed at work. I’m getting groceries using click and collect. I’m lonely, scared and need a bunk up. I cry sometimes. I will not be meeting though. Because i worry about the impact that may have on society. It's filling up because safety wasn't a concern for the government. If they closed all methods of travel into the country Britain wouldn't be in this position. Instead they allowed travellers to return home from infected areas. Because they were going to offer support should they remain where they were. " Weren't going to offer support* | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it "It's ok give it a few weeks I will end up doing everyone a favour. Because I'm not worthy of maintaining my mental health. Recommendation of 12 weeks isolation started Sunday. Which is 2 days after Friday. Here I am typhoid fucking Mary in everyone's eyes. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"It doesn't matter how long your story is, what weekend meets you try to justify, who you admonish for their activities, how good or how bad your health is - mental or physical. Just take a look at what is going on in Bergamo, the centre of the European epicenter and make up your own mind." It's ok il just go shopping it's safer than being in a private accommodation away from everyone else since everyone else is going shopping. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it
It's ok give it a few weeks I will end up doing everyone a favour. Because I'm not worthy of maintaining my mental health.
Recommendation of 12 weeks isolation started Sunday. Which is 2 days after Friday. Here I am typhoid fucking Mary in everyone's eyes."It’s lots of small, low risk interactions that eventually add up to thousands of people dead. If it takes some public shaming to incentivise people not to have those low risk interactions, so be it, I’m afraid. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it
It's ok give it a few weeks I will end up doing everyone a favour. Because I'm not worthy of maintaining my mental health.
Recommendation of 12 weeks isolation started Sunday. Which is 2 days after Friday. Here I am typhoid fucking Mary in everyone's eyes.
It’s lots of small, low risk interactions that eventually add up to thousands of people dead. If it takes some public shaming to incentivise people not to have those low risk interactions, so be it, I’m afraid."What of the people who aren't doing so though? What if these people are strictly minimising who they have contact with. Just like everyone else is doing with their family. But if someone doesn't have family they should just deal with it? Suck it up? Be damned with their mental health? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" We can't get online delivery from any supermarket here, even though I technically qualify as priority through being physically disabled. Ocado is our regular option but the website is down. Sainsbury's and Tesco etc are not accepting new registration. How do you get food without going to the shops? Obviously you go quickly, get what you need only and scarper quickly. I'm also shop for mates of mine who are more disabled, live alone and also can't get online delivery. One mate should be in the 1.5m extra vulnerable people but he's had nothing. Do I leave him to starve? No, I'm going to the fucking shop for him, OK. But I'm certainly not meeting randomers off the Internet for sex! It's got nothing to do with being liberated, it's got everything to do with common sense and supporting the greater good! Has your Local Authority got a community hub you can register on? Might be worth checking, you tick what your needs are and then they know you might need someone to shop for you and deliver to your doorstep. " Our local council website seems to be down and not responding, no one answers the phone. My friends from wheelchair basketball, some of whom live alone and normally have help from their parents (over 70) also cannot access assistance easily so until such time as we can get external support, someone will have to go to the shops, observing the protocols, and I'll continue to provide supplies to my friends. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Going to the supermarket to buy essential items and food isn’t the same as having a one on one meet with someone which will obviously involve physical contact. In the shops today I whizzed round and had surgical gloves on, didn’t touch my face didn’t linger or go too close to anyone. Was in and out used hand sanitiser when I got in my car and washed my hands when I got home. "
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it
It's ok give it a few weeks I will end up doing everyone a favour. Because I'm not worthy of maintaining my mental health.
Recommendation of 12 weeks isolation started Sunday. Which is 2 days after Friday. Here I am typhoid fucking Mary in everyone's eyes.
It’s lots of small, low risk interactions that eventually add up to thousands of people dead. If it takes some public shaming to incentivise people not to have those low risk interactions, so be it, I’m afraid.
What of the people who aren't doing so though? What if these people are strictly minimising who they have contact with. Just like everyone else is doing with their family. But if someone doesn't have family they should just deal with it? Suck it up? Be damned with their mental health?"That is exactly what we are supposed to be doing, yes. As has been pointed out, there are other things you can do for your mental health. There are other ways to communicate. Also, you’ve talked about these people being ‘trusted’ friends. That’s great, but no one knows whether they have it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So many people casting judgement on here. If you do not practice what you preach then you have no right to judge. If you're going to supermarkets you're not isolating. It's a public place and one which has the most foot traffic than anywhere else in the country now. When you understand the ways in which you can be infected by the virus then hopefully people will show more understanding, empathy and compassion. The virus spreads most in forms of micro droplets. Which come from breathing, coughing and sneezing. Every breath and infected person makes expels the virus from their body. On to which is surfaces that have varying rates in which the virus survives outside of the body. It lingers in the air for up to 3hrs. So in an infected person goes shopping then you're surrounded with potential means of catching it. Everything you touch and everywhere you breathe you're at risk. But going shopping people find acceptable they aren't judging people who go shopping. So when it comes to someone meeting someone privately in a private residence people lose their shit and out comes the judgement. But consider the risks who is taking more risks and who is putting more people at risk. Then we have the nhs workers who work directly with victims of the virus. Who go shopping... see where this is going? They are all potential carriers of the virus. To make more sense would be to have shuttle buses for nhs workers dealing with the victims. Saves spreading the virus through public transport and fuel stations by refilling their cars. The government to provide food for the nhs workers so they don't attend large foot traffic areas like supermarkets. Compensate the nhs workers who are in immediate risk of the virus, but also support the public by isolating the possible carriers even though they are doing their job they put others at risk by going to supermarkets. In severe deadly outbreaks it would be the health providers directly quarantined with the patients. They don't get to leave the quarantine whether or not they're infected. So begs the question why if it's so serious that nhs workers directly involved with victims of the virus is this not the case? Why I dare say is compassion for the nhs workers and the need to be with family. People considering the mental health well being of all of this. Not everyone has a support network. Some people are just trying to balance their mental health and seeing as 1 on 1 meets in a private residence has less chance of spread than the above can people stop making judgements on them which is also detrimental to their mental health. Mental health plays a huge roll in physical health. High levels of cortisol has an effect on the immune system. Increasing the odds of being severely affected by not just covid19 but other infections. If you don't leave your house and completely isolated yourself alone and manage to stay sane through it all I think you'll be just fine you'd have battled through and deserve appraisal. But we haven't got through it yet Loneliness and isolation is what breaks people down. Many of you get to isolate with another or other individuals, you still see loved ones and friends. Many of you have only just began living isolated life. Days and weeks soon people will understand what it's like being alone and will need mental health support from where ever they can get it. I'm quite sure nhs workers don't want suicide rates to go up, self harming rates to go up so if people need to meet don't judge them because you'll find yourself being a hypocrite when you leave your house to get what you need from the shops and what ever else makes you leave your house. It's easy to make judgement but look in the mirror first before you do, reflect on what you're actually doing first. I'm not putting health workers down but I am saying is judgement of people here is appalling and yet they judge without seeing the whole picture. Narrowminded that focuses on 1 thing and that's the fact they don't care about anyone else but themselves. They don't see people shopping as a risk because they do it. It's not risky to them in their eyes if others are doing it. Since they aren't meeting people to support their mental health other people who do are wrong. Time will tell how many people will change their _iews. Cabin fever sets in, the little voice in your head gets louder because you've ran out of distractions and you're left with thoughts. There's a reason inmates punishment of isolation rectifies behaviour. Humans need social contact. Think before you cast judgement" Amen to that sister x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it
It's ok give it a few weeks I will end up doing everyone a favour. Because I'm not worthy of maintaining my mental health.
Recommendation of 12 weeks isolation started Sunday. Which is 2 days after Friday. Here I am typhoid fucking Mary in everyone's eyes."You actually want to catch it and die? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your only sounding off because you've been having meets. I'm being judged as I always am. I'm judged for being a sexually liberated woman. I'm judged for trying to balance my mental health. People judging others when their actions are questionable also. Forced closure of clubs Friday and everything since people are judging it's amazing how people change. I have an evening with 2 fwbs and I'm treated with utter disdain. No one knows what goes on in my life or anyone else's but they sit here casting judgement and yet do not consider their own actions. No judgement from me.... We all have to make our own decisions...
People will make decisions based on their needs. I'm waiting in couple of weeks how many of these judgemental people will begin to meet again just to save their sanity. They will discover that digital connection isn't enough.
Or maybe hear that you or someone you met has a vulnerable relative who has contracted it and died as a result.
There are many who as a result of meeting now display a disregard for others safety and may find it hard to get meets later when they find they're on many block lists. If one demonstrates such disregard with is that clearly has no vaccine and is killing thousands it could be easily rightly be assumed they have little regard for others sexual health too even in the better times.
For me there's little difference. Behaviour is hard to change.
For me complete isolation or the virus during this pandemic will be the death of me. So in order for me to survive I see a fwb which isn't just about sex! I'm judged for trying to make sure I survive. It's not like I'm meeting complete strangers, I'm not having gangbangs with every Tom dick and Harry, I'm not throwing parties.
Guess adding a third person for last meet was essential.
Each to their own I guess.
Of course the third person was essential, I'm suprised it wasn't a gangbang!"For the photos and evidence it was only two playing | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it
It's ok give it a few weeks I will end up doing everyone a favour. Because I'm not worthy of maintaining my mental health.
Recommendation of 12 weeks isolation started Sunday. Which is 2 days after Friday. Here I am typhoid fucking Mary in everyone's eyes.
It’s lots of small, low risk interactions that eventually add up to thousands of people dead. If it takes some public shaming to incentivise people not to have those low risk interactions, so be it, I’m afraid.
What of the people who aren't doing so though? What if these people are strictly minimising who they have contact with. Just like everyone else is doing with their family. But if someone doesn't have family they should just deal with it? Suck it up? Be damned with their mental health?
That is exactly what we are supposed to be doing, yes.
As has been pointed out, there are other things you can do for your mental health. There are other ways to communicate.
Also, you’ve talked about these people being ‘trusted’ friends. That’s great, but no one knows whether they have it. "No one knows if the people who still continue to shop have it. The whole point of this is how from friday when the government decided to force closures the very same day I meet 2 fwbs for more than just sex. That if the government hadn't forced closures of public gathering places I wouldn't be so judged. Now people who met other individuals are the focus of people's judgement. Yet other people if given the chance would still continue to carry on. I didn't deserve the treatment I've had this weekend and neither does anyone else. I didn't go out nightclubbing. Even asked admin to remove the social event planned for Wednesday from the meets/events listings. I'm not advocating group gatherings. I'm advocating for people stop being judgemental when they don't know reasons behind their choices. I've lived with my mental health all my adult life. I try to manage it best I can by my self. If I had physical ailment and I need medication you'd tell me to take it, if I need social interaction with a person to keep well basically I'm just meant to ignore it and suffer the consequences of doing so. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"OP could you see a friend and stay two metres away and just chat? That’s social interaction but so much less risky. " You do see that lack of knowledge in the virus do you not? The 2m is the distance a normal breath travels in a single exhale. Risk has already been taken by being 2m so what difference does it make if I chose to have sex with that person or sat next to them watching movies for a few hours. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it
It's ok give it a few weeks I will end up doing everyone a favour. Because I'm not worthy of maintaining my mental health.
Recommendation of 12 weeks isolation started Sunday. Which is 2 days after Friday. Here I am typhoid fucking Mary in everyone's eyes.
It’s lots of small, low risk interactions that eventually add up to thousands of people dead. If it takes some public shaming to incentivise people not to have those low risk interactions, so be it, I’m afraid.
What of the people who aren't doing so though? What if these people are strictly minimising who they have contact with. Just like everyone else is doing with their family. But if someone doesn't have family they should just deal with it? Suck it up? Be damned with their mental health?
That is exactly what we are supposed to be doing, yes.
As has been pointed out, there are other things you can do for your mental health. There are other ways to communicate.
Also, you’ve talked about these people being ‘trusted’ friends. That’s great, but no one knows whether they have it.
No one knows if the people who still continue to shop have it.
The whole point of this is how from friday when the government decided to force closures the very same day I meet 2 fwbs for more than just sex.
That if the government hadn't forced closures of public gathering places I wouldn't be so judged. Now people who met other individuals are the focus of people's judgement. Yet other people if given the chance would still continue to carry on. I didn't deserve the treatment I've had this weekend and neither does anyone else. I didn't go out nightclubbing. Even asked admin to remove the social event planned for Wednesday from the meets/events listings. I'm not advocating group gatherings. I'm advocating for people stop being judgemental when they don't know reasons behind their choices.
I've lived with my mental health all my adult life. I try to manage it best I can by my self. If I had physical ailment and I need medication you'd tell me to take it, if I need social interaction with a person to keep well basically I'm just meant to ignore it and suffer the consequences of doing so."Even if the consequences is death? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it
It's ok give it a few weeks I will end up doing everyone a favour. Because I'm not worthy of maintaining my mental health.
Recommendation of 12 weeks isolation started Sunday. Which is 2 days after Friday. Here I am typhoid fucking Mary in everyone's eyes.
It’s lots of small, low risk interactions that eventually add up to thousands of people dead. If it takes some public shaming to incentivise people not to have those low risk interactions, so be it, I’m afraid.
What of the people who aren't doing so though? What if these people are strictly minimising who they have contact with. Just like everyone else is doing with their family. But if someone doesn't have family they should just deal with it? Suck it up? Be damned with their mental health?
That is exactly what we are supposed to be doing, yes.
As has been pointed out, there are other things you can do for your mental health. There are other ways to communicate.
Also, you’ve talked about these people being ‘trusted’ friends. That’s great, but no one knows whether they have it.
No one knows if the people who still continue to shop have it.
The whole point of this is how from friday when the government decided to force closures the very same day I meet 2 fwbs for more than just sex.
That if the government hadn't forced closures of public gathering places I wouldn't be so judged. Now people who met other individuals are the focus of people's judgement. Yet other people if given the chance would still continue to carry on. I didn't deserve the treatment I've had this weekend and neither does anyone else. I didn't go out nightclubbing. Even asked admin to remove the social event planned for Wednesday from the meets/events listings. I'm not advocating group gatherings. I'm advocating for people stop being judgemental when they don't know reasons behind their choices.
I've lived with my mental health all my adult life. I try to manage it best I can by my self. If I had physical ailment and I need medication you'd tell me to take it, if I need social interaction with a person to keep well basically I'm just meant to ignore it and suffer the consequences of doing so.
Even if the consequences is death?"What's the difference between suicide and potentially catching covid19? Weighing the risks of knowing a downward spiral being completely isolated will result in irrational thinking which leads to death. Or spending time with someone who also is isolated and least likely to have covid19 and prevent downward spiral. Which do you think is more likely to end up with a finale | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"OP could you see a friend and stay two metres away and just chat? That’s social interaction but so much less risky. You do see that lack of knowledge in the virus do you not? The 2m is the distance a normal breath travels in a single exhale. Risk has already been taken by being 2m so what difference does it make if I chose to have sex with that person or sat next to them watching movies for a few hours. " I’m stepping away from the thread. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established"  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" No one knows if the people who still continue to shop have it. " But people HAVE TO shop. It’s not a choice, particularly as those who genuinely need delivery slots are struggling to get them. You’re going to keep on doing what you want to do. I mean it genuinely when I say that I hope you don’t have cause to regret your choices when all is said and done. But please don’t convince yourself that there’s moral equivalence between what you are doing and people wanting to feed themselves and their loved ones. And try to respect that, when you get shamed after broadcasting what you’ve been up to, those people are actually doing the right thing by putting social pressure on others to keep themselves and everyone else safe. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" No one knows if the people who still continue to shop have it. But people HAVE TO shop. It’s not a choice, particularly as those who genuinely need delivery slots are struggling to get them. You’re going to keep on doing what you want to do. I mean it genuinely when I say that I hope you don’t have cause to regret your choices when all is said and done. But please don’t convince yourself that there’s moral equivalence between what you are doing and people wanting to feed themselves and their loved ones. And try to respect that, when you get shamed after broadcasting what you’ve been up to, those people are actually doing the right thing by putting social pressure on others to keep themselves and everyone else safe."
There are other ways to mitigate mental health issues. There are not other ways to get food. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You seriously can't put meets in the same category as people shopping for food! these two things are very different one is a necessity. So are threesomes, but bukkake parties are not. This has been established As I explained my Friday evening it's no where near a bukkake party. How many other people had company Friday? How many were at the pub for final closing until restrictions are lifted? Who’s here saying that’s justified? Look, I don’t really judge you particularly. You’re right that it was probably a low risk interaction, but lots of low risk decisions combine to make a high risk sequence. What’s done is done. I just think you need to be more scared than you are for the sake of other people, and think that the risky decisions should stop now. I'm isolated 99% of my time the risks are higher to me in terms of my mental health than me meeting someone I trust. I'm not likely to be infecting people if I don't see people. So what are the risks of 2 isolated people seeing each other? I'm more likely to catch the virus going to a supermarket. Which I haven't done for weeks. Since as of the past month I've seen a person once every 7 days. That means I've been through the 7 day isolation period. If I'm sick il do 14 days but no doubt that should I catch it I won't be around that long if it's covid19. You say you're high risk and the virus could kill you but you're having threesomes to increase your chances of catching it
It's ok give it a few weeks I will end up doing everyone a favour. Because I'm not worthy of maintaining my mental health.
Recommendation of 12 weeks isolation started Sunday. Which is 2 days after Friday. Here I am typhoid fucking Mary in everyone's eyes."You're obviously hurting. And if people cannot empathise with you, even if they disagree, they are not worthy of your response. We all will be on lockdown very shortly, maybe that will shut them up. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
