FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > The Wheels are coming off
The Wheels are coming off
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online. The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination." Considering the study only contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. The mean age of death was 70.4 years. The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. Yes these were within 2 weeks of their vaccine but it also states - Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death. So using their words they found a "CASUAL" link that 325 people most of them around 70 years old died within 2 weeks of vaccination from the vaccine. These conditions are already very high causes of death in that age group naturally. I'd love to know how they can actually prove the vaccine caused their death. Not really concrete evidence if you ask me but whatever. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online. The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination. Considering the study only contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. The mean age of death was 70.4 years. The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. Yes these were within 2 weeks of their vaccine but it also states - Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death. So using their words they found a "CASUAL" link that 325 people most of them around 70 years old died within 2 weeks of vaccination from the vaccine. These conditions are already very high causes of death in that age group naturally. I'd love to know how they can actually prove the vaccine caused their death. Not really concrete evidence if you ask me but whatever. " *********************************** Genuine ask........ Did you mean CAUSAL or CASUAL as you've used both words....?? I have very little interest in medical terminology, even less in medical matters of this type. I casually flashed your post and noticed the anomaly. Sorry.... Pedantic-am-I...!  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why censor????? Deaths 1-20 are up 22%" Where did you get this figure? I can't find anything to suggest this. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why censor????? Deaths 1-20 are up 22%" Because nutjobs and conspiracy theorists would have jumped on it claiming a moral victory regardless of the actual facts. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why censor????? Deaths 1-20 are up 22% Because nutjobs and conspiracy theorists would have jumped on it claiming a moral victory regardless of the actual facts." Its out there if you use the right search engine, I'm into sadism, I get my kicks from this, so does the NHS and government | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
""This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed."" Yes they have, I'll bet a thousand you had no jabs at all like 75% of NHS staff | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
 . If the criteria has to include the causality. They are going to find the causality!
Then you find out there are only
28 out of around 1700 studies.
Puts a very different slant on things. No wonder I found my above post, the removal of the non peer reviewed pre-printed paper due to poor methodology. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
""This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed." Yes they have, I'll bet a thousand you had no jabs at all like 75% of NHS staff" You don't have a clue. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Best of luck but I bet you've had none of them like 75% of nurses" nurses or NHS staff ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Best of luck but I bet you've had none of them like 75% of nurses" Some of us are nurses  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Best of luck but I bet you've had none of them like 75% of nurses Some of us are nurses "And i bet you've not had it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why so defensive, why am I I still alive" noone claimed covid was 100pc lethal. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Best of luck but I bet you've had none of them like 75% of nurses Some of us are nurses
And i bet you've not had it"I had two AZ and two Pfizer. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Best of luck but I bet you've had none of them like 75% of nurses Some of us are nurses
And i bet you've not had it
I had two AZ and two Pfizer.
"good | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why so defensive, why am I I still alive noone claimed covid was 100pc lethal. "And oddly enough, a very biased study didn't find the vaccine 100% fatal either. Quite amusing. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why so defensive, why am I I still alive noone claimed covid was 100pc lethal.
And oddly enough, a very biased study didn't find the vaccine 100% fatal either. Quite amusing."25pc of cases originally linked to the vaccine were then judged not to be. Good paper.  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Nor is smoking, the stronger you are the more resistance you have. Don't take notice of that one with the evil smile, definitely Brigade 77" odd strawman. What's your point caller ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why so defensive, why am I I still alive noone claimed covid was 100pc lethal.
And oddly enough, a very biased study didn't find the vaccine 100% fatal either. Quite amusing."The government was going full mandate, knock on the door of the unvaxxed and hold you down, until they realised 75% of NHS nurses had refused, why, they saw what it was doing. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why so defensive, why am I I still alive noone claimed covid was 100pc lethal.
And oddly enough, a very biased study didn't find the vaccine 100% fatal either. Quite amusing. The government was going full mandate, knock on the door of the unvaxxed and hold you down, until they realised 75% of NHS nurses had refused, why, they saw what it was doing. "i think it were more up untill the anesthetist got on thr news speaking to javid explaining how un realistic it were for the jabs to offer protection unless boosted every 10 weeks few days later it were scapped | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
Popcorns ready, make my day | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why so defensive, why am I I still alive noone claimed covid was 100pc lethal.
And oddly enough, a very biased study didn't find the vaccine 100% fatal either. Quite amusing. The government was going full mandate, knock on the door of the unvaxxed and hold you down, until they realised 75% of NHS nurses had refused, why, they saw what it was doing. i think it were more up untill the anesthetist got on thr news speaking to javid explaining how un realistic it were for the jabs to offer protection unless boosted every 10 weeks few days later it were scapped "Never happened, mate | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why so defensive, why am I I still alive noone claimed covid was 100pc lethal.
And oddly enough, a very biased study didn't find the vaccine 100% fatal either. Quite amusing. The government was going full mandate, knock on the door of the unvaxxed and hold you down, until they realised 75% of NHS nurses had refused, why, they saw what it was doing. i think it were more up untill the anesthetist got on thr news speaking to javid explaining how un realistic it were for the jabs to offer protection unless boosted every 10 weeks few days later it were scapped
Never happened, mate "what didnt? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Loving the range of comments. No medication is 100% safe and considering the urgency and speed with which the vaccine was produced it worked incredibly well. For those that believe the government were trying to inject you with something bad and untested def not the case. The way vaccines work means they did enough pre testing. Vaccines are only aimed at stimulating an antigen response and nothing more. The poor general understanding of biology, biological sciences, pharmacology and basic physiology are what gives rise most of the "alt" theories. The big numbers are over 5.5billion inoculations vs 700m covid infections 7m deaths. Compared with approx 50m deaths due to the Spanish flu in 1918. In relative terms the fact that so many people were prepared to take the vaccine broke the p2p transmission and saved significantly more lives. " It was 17 million two years ago | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
""This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed."" Quality control. Oh noes. Tyranny! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do your own research. BBC is Gates funded" I tried to. That is what I found. Plus, I didn't make the claim. Tho my research has found that 100pc of unvaxinated smell and are virgins. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do your own research. BBC is Gates funded" I've done my own research and found that the BBC/Gates funding canard is wildly misleading and shouted by people who think research means sitting on the toilet scrolling Facebook. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
""This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed." Quality control. Oh noes. Tyranny!" Its been put back, simply go to the site and it reappears by magic, at the date it was censored | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
""This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed." Quality control. Oh noes. Tyranny! Its been put back, simply go to the site and it reappears by magic, at the date it was censored "Do you know what censorship means? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
""This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lancet reserves the right to remove a paper that has been posted if we determine that it has violated our screening criteria. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed." Quality control. Oh noes. Tyranny! Its been put back, simply go to the site and it reappears by magic, at the date it was censored "what do you mean by "at the date it was censored" ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"In the words of Private James Frazer "we're doomed!"" In the words of esteemed Health Ranger Mike Adams, interviewed by Alex Jonesat the beginning of the pandemic: "it's over for humanity. There will only be lone survivors" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"In the words of Private James Frazer "we're doomed!"" DON'T TELL THEM PRIVATE JONES! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"In the words of Private James Frazer "we're doomed!"" Don't tell them your name pike | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online. The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination." Over 99% of people who died were either men or women. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"In the words of Private James Frazer "we're doomed!" Don't tell them your name pike " Lol ^^ As a couple who still suffer the aftermath of Covid we used to take these posts seriously. Now they just lighten the mood as we get on with our daily lives. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most nurse have and doctor like smiley here are trained by big pharma and they simply quote from the book, I'm a chemical engineer, I could be a doctor but my qualification meant I could get a better paid job in industry without going to medical college. In other words, only the dregs go into the NHS, anyone any good goes to Harley Street" My NHS gynaecologist has a practice on Harley Street. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"So why so defensive, why am I I still alive noone claimed covid was 100pc lethal.
And oddly enough, a very biased study didn't find the vaccine 100% fatal either. Quite amusing. The government was going full mandate, knock on the door of the unvaxxed and hold you down, until they realised 75% of NHS nurses had refused, why, they saw what it was doing. "The way to discuss a paper is probably not by spouting what you just have. If you have a good understanding of it and solid points, they can be made with good strength and clarity | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Do your own research. BBC is Gates funded I've done my own research and found that the BBC/Gates funding canard is wildly misleading and shouted by people who think research means sitting on the toilet scrolling Facebook." Or that peer reviewed is the only standard required to assure of a worthy study | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most nurse have and doctor like smiley here are trained by big pharma and they simply quote from the book, I'm a chemical engineer, I could be a doctor but my qualification meant I could get a better paid job in industry without going to medical college. In other words, only the dregs go into the NHS, anyone any good goes to Harley Street" You couldn't be a doctor or a nurse. BTW we are not "trained", we have studied to read through bullshit and to give evidence based care. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Intrigued where this 75pc had come from. Most I can find is 5. Across all staff. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-60104140" From what I've read most reports vary from 5-25% certainly nothing like 75% and of course the reasons could be many and varied; religious, ethnic background etc. The stupid catch all the poster gave is all just designed to fit their narrative. That's why I always take it with a pinch (large) of salt. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most nurse have and doctor like smiley here are trained by big pharma and they simply quote from the book, I'm a chemical engineer, I could be a doctor but my qualification meant I could get a better paid job in industry without going to medical college. In other words, only the dregs go into the NHS, anyone any good goes to Harley Street You couldn't be a doctor or a nurse. BTW we are not "trained", we have studied to read through bullshit and to give evidence based care." Although we do skills training with companies who have monopolies on equipment but that's the nature of innovation. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Most nurse have and doctor like smiley here are trained by big pharma and they simply quote from the book, I'm a chemical engineer, I could be a doctor but my qualification meant I could get a better paid job in industry without going to medical college. In other words, only the dregs go into the NHS, anyone any good goes to Harley Street" What a hugely inaccurate and insulting comment to make. Hang your head in shame. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" Tho my research has found that 100pc of unvaxinated smell and are virgins. "Your method is flawed, rejected by peer review. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
