FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Anyone regret
Anyone regret
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not getting the vaccine (touchy subject) " Vaccine hesitancy is resulting in increased in diseases we had almost completely eradicated. Because of the nonsesense spread by the tinfoil had brigade! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I don’t regret not getting it at all. " I don’t either, I had three. I wouldn’t have any more though as I’m not convinced it’s really that effective. Either way it seems you can still catch it and it’s not really as bad as we were led to believe. I don’t think the measures taken in 2020/21/22 will ever be tolerated again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Marc Bernier ?" ??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not getting the vaccine (touchy subject) " No | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think it's actually more of the fact that people regret getting the vaccine in the first place" There's a lot of that for sure | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is why the virus forum should be finally removed" Because people don't regret not getting the vaccine? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is why the virus forum should be finally removed Because people don't regret not getting the vaccine?" Too much vitriol on both sides of the argument. This is a swingers site not a lets debate our political ideology.....yes I know, I can just pass it by. Just saying. Seems redundant now for this site, plenty of places you can argue your vaccine opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I don’t regret not getting it at all. " Same | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Absolutely not and I'm proud of every single one of you who didn't budge and stuck to your guns even when you were bullied and threatened with you job etc, you're all amazing x" And I'm proud of anyone who made informed decisions, whether that meant accepting or declining the vaccine! I'm also proud of people who don't run others down whether they have had the vaccine it not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Absolutely not and I'm proud of every single one of you who didn't budge and stuck to your guns even when you were bullied and threatened with you job etc, you're all amazing x And I'm proud of anyone who made informed decisions, whether that meant accepting or declining the vaccine! I'm also proud of people who don't run others down whether they have had the vaccine it not." Or not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not getting the vaccine (touchy subject) " the people who really regret not getting the vaccine are dead. I have had all the available vaccinations & still caught covid twice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And so it begins again…. Only another 160 odd posts to go….. " Tis fairly useless exercise yes, but so are a lot of threads here lol. It's not just virus ones, go in the lounge and there's nine out of ten threads that serve very little to no purpose informing anyone or being relevant, because who cares what regrets someone has or what they did. But that's personal to the way one sees it... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Absolutely not and I'm proud of every single one of you who didn't budge and stuck to your guns even when you were bullied and threatened with you job etc, you're all amazing x And I'm proud of anyone who made informed decisions, whether that meant accepting or declining the vaccine! I'm also proud of people who don't run others down whether they have had the vaccine it not. Or not" Probably one of the best responses we've seen in a long time. As a family we didn't get any Covid vacinnes, had our reasons, but no-one wanted to listen. We were vilified, lost friends, pulled into meetings at work. Absolutely don't regret our decision. It was the right thing to do for us as a family x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Did you know they are pushing them onto pregnant woman now…. Assuming they are desired Guess they have to be used before they reach best before … or would have been to be deemed a waste of ££££" They aren't offering anyone a covid booster unless very old or have certain vulnerabilities. Pregnancy isn't one of them. The newborn is at higher risk from covid until the age of 1, but pregnant women are not routinely offered a covid vaccine these days. The restricted number of people offered the covid vaccine this winter was primarily downs to ££££s. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is why the virus forum should be finally removed" Definitely not. It's extremely useful as a filter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not getting the vaccine (touchy subject) the people who really regret not getting the vaccine are dead. I have had all the available vaccinations & still caught covid twice " What a ridiculous comment. Did you interview every one who didn't get the COVID vaccine before they died or have you been able to make contact with them after they died? Going by your personal experience, they could've still caught COVID, and potentially died, even if they had the COVID vaccines. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not getting the vaccine (touchy subject) " If people are living in a world where they regret things then they are not looking forward to a new day but living in the past. What's done is done, move on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What a shame Edith Piaf is not alive today!" Ha ha but her record lives on  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is why the virus forum should be finally removed" If you don't want the virus forum here then commenting on them isn't going to help | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All the medical experts on here as usual. I bet they all eat tonnes of meat and processed shite but never give it a second thought " Relationship of this to the virus is what? It's a weird thing to say without any rationale. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All the medical experts on here as usual. I bet they all eat tonnes of meat and processed shite but never give it a second thought Relationship of this to the virus is what? It's a weird thing to say without any rationale." I can relate to what they said  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All the medical experts on here as usual. I bet they all eat tonnes of meat and processed shite but never give it a second thought Relationship of this to the virus is what? It's a weird thing to say without any rationale. I can relate to what they said "I can stab at a guess but I want the poster's rationale. As it's like all brexiteers are right and remainders left leaning politically (IE nonsensical). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All the medical experts on here as usual. I bet they all eat tonnes of meat and processed shite but never give it a second thought Relationship of this to the virus is what? It's a weird thing to say without any rationale. I can relate to what they said
I can stab at a guess but I want the poster's rationale. As it's like all brexiteers are right and remainders left leaning politically (IE nonsensical)."Of course you can, not everyone is going to explain themselves thoroughly. I'm a "brexiteer", voted leave, have my reasons, I'm definitely not 'right', but people assume that I am because I vote leave. I have friends accused me of being a leftie, again I'm not. It is nonsense but that's the problem when you take it too seriously. Which btw I'm not necessarily saying about you, everyone is guilty of being too serious sometimes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Flu renamed COVID lol Turbo cancers due to vaccine lol Blood clots solely due to vaccine lol " Flu and covid are 2 entirely different viruses. The turbo cancer claim on you tube has been proved to be inaccurate but the covid vaccines are accelerating research into cancer treatments according to the Cancer Research Institute which is great news. Some people got blood clots from the vaccine and some from catching covid but the risk is much higher from catching covid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Flu renamed COVID lol Turbo cancers due to vaccine lol Blood clots solely due to vaccine lol Flu and covid are 2 entirely different viruses. The turbo cancer claim on you tube has been proved to be inaccurate but the covid vaccines are accelerating research into cancer treatments according to the Cancer Research Institute which is great news. Some people got blood clots from the vaccine and some from catching covid but the risk is much higher from catching covid." Shhh don’t talk sense. What will people do with there tinfoil hats and YouTube sound bites? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If I could get one now, I would so long as it's Pfizer." Had AZ and then pfizer, hesitant to have more because pfizer one made me feel like crap. Same as flu jabs, had loads of those but the last 2 made me feel like shit. Some will say its small price to pay feeling dull for a few days but nobody wants to willingly feel like that  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All the medical experts on here as usual. I bet they all eat tonnes of meat and processed shite but never give it a second thought " I eat meat and have never given it a second thought. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If I could get one now, I would so long as it's Pfizer. Had AZ and then pfizer, hesitant to have more because pfizer one made me feel like crap. Same as flu jabs, had loads of those but the last 2 made me feel like shit. Some will say its small price to pay feeling dull for a few days but nobody wants to willingly feel like that "Likewise, I had two AZ, nil side effects. First Pfizer - ended up in A&E due to eyesight affected. Second Pfizer - more side effects. Now I have had COVID, I won't have any more boosters (I prefer immunity naturally induced than artificially). If another pandemic (different pathogen) comes along, yes I'd (probably) have the initial vaccination after making an informed decision. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Check out history 6 shots of mengicoccal vaccine given to soldiers.. Thousands died and spread it. Spanish flu they call it. Started in Kansas USA. True history" "A meningitis vaccine trial at a U.S. military camp did not cause the 1918 Spanish Flu By Reuters Fact Check True story huh? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Check out history 6 shots of mengicoccal vaccine given to soldiers.. Thousands died and spread it. Spanish flu they call it. Started in Kansas USA. True history "A meningitis vaccine trial at a U.S. military camp did not cause the 1918 Spanish Flu By Reuters Fact Check True story huh? " Honestly I wouldn't bother engaging with people who get their info off facebook. Its like beating your head repeatedly against a brickwall 
Mr | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Check out history 6 shots of mengicoccal vaccine given to soldiers.. Thousands died and spread it. Spanish flu they call it. Started in Kansas USA. True history" Yes they made a YouTube documentary at the time lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Check out history 6 shots of mengicoccal vaccine given to soldiers.. Thousands died and spread it. Spanish flu they call it. Started in Kansas USA. True history" Hold on another expert posted this: "It was caused by the introduction of emf radiation from telegraph wires, the deaths were caused by the vaccine that was rolled out, I have detailed files on this event" Now I don't know what to believe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My mate ended up nearly dying of Covid, repeatedly lost consciousness at home, tried to drive to hospital and lost consciousness and crashed his car, then barely escaped being put on a ventilator…. and he still doesn’t regret not getting vaccinated. And he still says it was “just a cold”. There’s some idiots out there whose ego’s are too big to admit they could be wrong about something." When you have science and facts you don’t need an ego. Clearly you prefer bravado and machismo! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I see the WHO have rescinded our measles free status. That’s something to get behind and be proud of in the 21st century." Indeed. not for us to go eradicating illnesses which the almighty has created, with his infinite wisdom, for some mysterious reason but surely for our benefit! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Check out history 6 shots of mengicoccal vaccine given to soldiers.. Thousands died and spread it. Spanish flu they call it. Started in Kansas USA. True history Hold on another expert posted this: "It was caused by the introduction of emf radiation from telegraph wires, the deaths were caused by the vaccine that was rolled out, I have detailed files on this event" Now I don't know what to believe" Only believe what you see on TikTok. Apparently it is full of knowledgeable scientists ans professors. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Don't regret our 2 vaccines as it was only way we could carry on enjoying our lives, holidays etc. one of us caught COVID pre vaccine in 2020, we've both had it post vaccine, 2022. We've not had boosters as we didn't feel the need but no regrets." NOT getting the vaccine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not getting the vaccine (touchy subject) " Possibly some of those who have had tragic outcomes? I know if my dear old mum could have had it, she would. Can't go back in time though. That said I so "regret" the forcing of my young children to have it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Reuters Fact Check " Oh please! You'll be quoting BBC Verify next! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Reuters Fact Check Oh please! You'll be quoting BBC Verify next!" Your point? I included that so anyone could Google it. The vaccine for meningococcal bacterium would not have caused Spanish flu. Different pathogens. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Reuters Fact Check Oh please! You'll be quoting BBC Verify next! Your point? I included that so anyone could Google it. The vaccine for meningococcal bacterium would not have caused Spanish flu. Different pathogens." My point is if you're so confident of your answer you don't need to quote a for-profit fact checking company. Link it to the peer reviewed scientific paper by title and author(s) instead. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Reuters Fact Check Oh please! You'll be quoting BBC Verify next! Your point? I included that so anyone could Google it. The vaccine for meningococcal bacterium would not have caused Spanish flu. Different pathogens. My point is if you're so confident of your answer you don't need to quote a for-profit fact checking company. Link it to the peer reviewed scientific paper by title and author(s) instead." Yeah could have done but didn't  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"NOT GETTING THE VACCINE. How hard was that to read? " Are you getting the vaccine? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Check out history 6 shots of mengicoccal vaccine given to soldiers.. Thousands died and spread it. Spanish flu they call it. Started in Kansas USA. True history" Fortunately not everyone succumbed: "Notes 1918 - Many deaths were prevented by using homoeopathic medicines." Abolish the NHS, drink diluted nothing bashed against a saddle | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"NOT GETTING THE VACCINE. How hard was that to read? Are you getting the vaccine?" No. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ?" They buy a lot of tin foil? Do I win a prize | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? They buy a lot of tin foil? Do I win a prize "Does the 20/80 rule apply | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? They buy a lot of tin foil? Do I win a prize
Does the 20/80 rule apply "The 20/80 rule? Could you elaborate please? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? They buy a lot of tin foil? Do I win a prize
Does the 20/80 rule apply
The 20/80 rule?
Could you elaborate please?"20% of the people come up with 80% of the social media rumours and propaganda. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ?" You tell me. What is the correlation between the percentage of the population of the UK who had one COVID-19 vaccine and the demographic of the virus forums on Fab? Only people over 18 years old can join Fab. How does that affect the 94% who of the UK population ? What percentage of Fab users venture into the the Virus forum? Do we count visitors to the Virus forum or just the people who post threads/comments? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle" No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If I could get one now, I would so long as it's Pfizer. Had AZ and then pfizer, hesitant to have more because pfizer one made me feel like crap. Same as flu jabs, had loads of those but the last 2 made me feel like shit. Some will say its small price to pay feeling dull for a few days but nobody wants to willingly feel like that "The reason why I wouldn't take the Astra Zeneca, was because several colleagues who had it. Had to take time off from work. While the first Pfizer knocked me about for about 3 days. I could feel it going through my arm. The second, not so bad. Maybe a day.....and probably not a good idea to mix them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? They buy a lot of tin foil? Do I win a prize "You do! It's the prize for laughing at your own joke. It's a voucher for 5 more COVID-19 boosters! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If I could get one now, I would so long as it's Pfizer. Had AZ and then pfizer, hesitant to have more because pfizer one made me feel like crap. Same as flu jabs, had loads of those but the last 2 made me feel like shit. Some will say its small price to pay feeling dull for a few days but nobody wants to willingly feel like that
The reason why I wouldn't take the Astra Zeneca, was because several colleagues who had it. Had to take time off from work.
While the first Pfizer knocked me about for about 3 days. I could feel it going through my arm. The second, not so bad. Maybe a day.....and probably not a good idea to mix them."Can't get AZ one now I don't think, but I had no issue with them, it was pfizer that makes you feel crap | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ?" The 6% are here  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here "Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My mate ended up nearly dying of Covid, repeatedly lost consciousness at home, tried to drive to hospital and lost consciousness and crashed his car, then barely escaped being put on a ventilator…. and he still doesn’t regret not getting vaccinated. And he still says it was “just a cold”. There’s some idiots out there whose ego’s are too big to admit they could be wrong about something. When you have science and facts you don’t need an ego. Clearly you prefer bravado and machismo!" Excuse me? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!"Anti-vaxxers have no sense of humour FACT! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!"Got a first | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Anti-vaxxers have no sense of humour
FACT!"They don't need one when they always have the last laugh. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Anti-vaxxers have no sense of humour
FACT!
They don't need one when they always have the last laugh."Laugh about what? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first "They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two. It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My mate ended up nearly dying of Covid, repeatedly lost consciousness at home, tried to drive to hospital and lost consciousness and crashed his car, then barely escaped being put on a ventilator…. and he still doesn’t regret not getting vaccinated. And he still says it was “just a cold”. There’s some idiots out there whose ego’s are too big to admit they could be wrong about something. When you have science and facts you don’t need an ego. Clearly you prefer bravado and machismo! Excuse me?" You anecdote was one of bravado and machismo. What are you failing to grasp? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
"Ha! I can assure you the uni lecturers erred on the side of harsh . And if you think a BSc is earned through a piece of coursework, then you are mistaken.
Besides, why would I fact check something like the stats mentioned when I was responding in humour. Bloody Nora fella, this site is often used for light relief
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
"Checking the facts The bitter, bitter irony | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Anti-vaxxers have no sense of humour
FACT!
They don't need one when they always have the last laugh.
Laugh about what?"You. I'm feeling generous so will pop some COVID-19 booster vouchers in the post for you too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
Checking the facts
The bitter, bitter irony"Indeed! If only NI Two had done the same! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
Checking the facts
The bitter, bitter irony
Indeed! If only NI Two had done the same!"Over 9 in 10 people aged 12 years and over in the UK had received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, nearly 9 in 10 had received two doses and around 7 in 10 had received three or more doses by the end of August 2022. ONS | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Anti-vaxxers have no sense of humour
FACT!
They don't need one when they always have the last laugh.
Laugh about what?
You.
I'm feeling generous so will pop some COVID-19 booster vouchers in the post for you too."Thanks much appreciated I'll send you some brain cells in return | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
Checking the facts
The bitter, bitter irony
Indeed! If only NI Two had done the same!"If only you ever had How's that Spanish flu research going? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
Checking the facts
The bitter, bitter irony
Indeed! If only NI Two had done the same!
Over 9 in 10 people aged 12 years and over in the UK had received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, nearly 9 in 10 had received two doses and around 7 in 10 had received three or more doses by the end of August 2022.
ONS"That isn't what NITwo said though is it? And I'm referring to the figure relating to receiving a single dose. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My mate ended up nearly dying of Covid, repeatedly lost consciousness at home, tried to drive to hospital and lost consciousness and crashed his car, then barely escaped being put on a ventilator…. and he still doesn’t regret not getting vaccinated. And he still says it was “just a cold”. There’s some idiots out there whose ego’s are too big to admit they could be wrong about something. When you have science and facts you don’t need an ego. Clearly you prefer bravado and machismo! Excuse me? You anecdote was one of bravado and machismo. What are you failing to grasp? " You’re the one failing to grasp it. I’m not talking about myself, numb nuts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
Checking the facts
The bitter, bitter irony
Indeed! If only NI Two had done the same!
If only you ever had
How's that Spanish flu research going?""94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine." Is this statistic that NITwo quoted factually correct? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
Checking the facts
The bitter, bitter irony
Indeed! If only NI Two had done the same!
Over 9 in 10 people aged 12 years and over in the UK had received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, nearly 9 in 10 had received two doses and around 7 in 10 had received three or more doses by the end of August 2022.
ONS
That isn't what NITwo said though is it? And I'm referring to the figure relating to receiving a single dose."Go look  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not getting the vaccine (touchy subject) " Nope, not for a second. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. " That's what I said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
Checking the facts
The bitter, bitter irony
Indeed! If only NI Two had done the same!"Eh ? Facts ar available on multiple sources. Rounded to the nearest 1% | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
Checking the facts
The bitter, bitter irony
Indeed! If only NI Two had done the same!
If only you ever had
How's that Spanish flu research going?
"94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Is this statistic that NITwo quoted factually correct?"Surely if your are arguing a point on a social media site you must have the wit to be able to use Google and source facts ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? The 6% are here
Statistics was obviously never your strongest subject!
Got a first
They must've applied a similar level of scrutiny to marking your coursework as you applied to the facts presented by NI Two.
It is rather disappointing from someone who is usually so particular about the checking the facts.
Checking the facts
The bitter, bitter irony
Indeed! If only NI Two had done the same!
If only you ever had
How's that Spanish flu research going?
"94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Is this statistic that NITwo quoted factually correct?
Surely if your are arguing a point on a social media site you must have the wit to be able to use Google and source facts ?"I can find that statistic for the UK population aged 12 years and over. Wikipedia - "92.9% of UK population 12+ have received one vaccine dose" ONS - "Over 9 in 10 people aged 12 years and over in the UK had received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine" However, I'm struggling to find that statistic for "the population of the UK". NI Two - "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine." Can you quote your source please? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ?" Not the statistics I saw, I would say there was way more that didn’t take the vaccine I base this on the fact that the government,corporations and health services almost went full on authoritarian with those that refused to comply, We was bullied threatened ect ect Pretty sure they would have made it mandatory if not for the NHS staffs refusal We was resolute in our decision and would have gone to the bitter end NO we won’t comply ! NO we won’t take your vaccine Ever | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said "No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it. Scroll up and check. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check."20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation 80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?"Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule. Technically, you got it wrong. Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine." Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed."80/20 20/80 Is the same it’s just expressed differently Like A = B or B = A The data is available on the ONS as previously stated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No best decisions we ever made especially for the kids" I can only assume you have with made very few decisions or very poor ones if this is the best one #mindBlown | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated."Quite | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated."It's not the same. Switch the numbers all you like, the words remain static. As for the statistic, previously stated by whom? The ONS only has that statistic for the UK population aged 12 years and over, not the UK population. Unless that's the same, just expressed differently? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite "So you can't quote the source? It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"94% if the population of the UK had at least one vaccine. What does that say about the demographic of the virus forums on fab ? Not the statistics I saw, I would say there was way more that didn’t take the vaccine I base this on the fact that the government,corporations and health services almost went full on authoritarian with those that refused to comply, We was bullied threatened ect ect Pretty sure they would have made it mandatory if not for the NHS staffs refusal We was resolute in our decision and would have gone to the bitter end NO we won’t comply ! NO we won’t take your vaccine Ever " Just short of 95% of over 12s have had a least one vaccination. Which works out just short of 80% of the total population have had at least one covid vaccination. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!"It seems like you're one of the 20% and most of the 80% find the data readily available. Strange that .. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!"Hey lazy 90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021. NHS England Vax stats pdf | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!"As you have probably learned in the past, it's against forum rules to link to government sites and results in a timeout etc Stating a point if view isnt mocking | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
As you have probably learned in the past, it's against forum rules to link to government sites and results in a timeout etc
Stating a point if view isnt mocking
"Don’t feed the trolls. You can’t argue with …  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf"Lazy? I've already quoted two sources which referred to the UK population aged 12 and over. You've just quoted a source for adults (in England?) NI Two still can't quote a source for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine." Until that happens it is false or inaccurate information. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Don’t feed the trolls. " Somebody has read DurhamSlut's post... and is now reverting to insults to cover their tracks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? I've already quoted two sources which referred to the UK population aged 12 and over.
You've just quoted a source for adults (in England?)
NI Two still can't quote a source for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Until that happens it is false or inaccurate information."You repeated my source the ONS. NI stated it was rounded up, also the ONS. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf"Lazy? That's rather insulting and unnecessary isn't it? 40m people had the 1st dose. The population of the UK is nearly 70m (68m). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? That's rather insulting and unnecessary isn't it?
40m people had the 1st dose. The population of the UK is nearly 70m (68m)."The stats are for the adult population. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? That's rather insulting and unnecessary isn't it?
40m people had the 1st dose. The population of the UK is nearly 70m (68m).
The stats are for the adult population. "Yes exactly. The vaccine was not available to the kids initially. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Don’t feed the trolls. Somebody has read DurhamSlut's post... and is now reverting to insults to cover their tracks." You’ve chosen the shoe fits. That’s on you broski. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? That's rather insulting and unnecessary isn't it?
40m people had the 1st dose. The population of the UK is nearly 70m (68m).
The stats are for the adult population.
Yes exactly. The vaccine was not available to the kids initially. "And your point is? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? That's rather insulting and unnecessary isn't it?
40m people had the 1st dose. The population of the UK is nearly 70m (68m).
The stats are for the adult population. "And NI Two's stats was for the 'UK population', not the 'adult population', not the 'UK population aged 12 and over'. All he has to do is quote his source! He seems very hesitant to do so. Maybe he's also read NylonSlut's post? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? That's rather insulting and unnecessary isn't it?
40m people had the 1st dose. The population of the UK is nearly 70m (68m)."Oh puhlease, that doesn't register on the insult scale compared to what goes on in here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? That's rather insulting and unnecessary isn't it?
40m people had the 1st dose. The population of the UK is nearly 70m (68m)."Are you refuting the percentage? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? I've already quoted two sources which referred to the UK population aged 12 and over.
You've just quoted a source for adults (in England?)
NI Two still can't quote a source for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Until that happens it is false or inaccurate information.
You repeated my source the ONS.
NI stated it was rounded up, also the ONS.
"I've only seen that statistic on the ONS website for 'the UK population aged 12 years and over', not 'the population of the UK'. Have you seen "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine", without adult or over 12 years old, on the ONS website? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? I've already quoted two sources which referred to the UK population aged 12 and over.
You've just quoted a source for adults (in England?)
NI Two still can't quote a source for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Until that happens it is false or inaccurate information.
You repeated my source the ONS.
NI stated it was rounded up, also the ONS.
I've only seen that statistic on the ONS website for 'the UK population aged 12 years and over', not 'the population of the UK'.
Have you seen "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine", without adult or over 12 years old, on the ONS website?"93.6% | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? I've already quoted two sources which referred to the UK population aged 12 and over.
You've just quoted a source for adults (in England?)
NI Two still can't quote a source for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Until that happens it is false or inaccurate information.
You repeated my source the ONS.
NI stated it was rounded up, also the ONS.
I've only seen that statistic on the ONS website for 'the UK population aged 12 years and over', not 'the population of the UK'.
Have you seen "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine", without adult or over 12 years old, on the ONS website?
93.6%"A featured snippet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? I've already quoted two sources which referred to the UK population aged 12 and over.
You've just quoted a source for adults (in England?)
NI Two still can't quote a source for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Until that happens it is false or inaccurate information.
You repeated my source the ONS.
NI stated it was rounded up, also the ONS.
I've only seen that statistic on the ONS website for 'the UK population aged 12 years and over', not 'the population of the UK'.
Have you seen "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine", without adult or over 12 years old, on the ONS website?
93.6%
A featured snippet "Not the percentage, just 'UK population' e.g. without adult or over 12 years old. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's called the Pareto principle No, the Pareto principle is otherwise known as the 80/20 rule. 80% of consequences, come from 20% of causes. That's what I said
No, you said "the 20/80 rule" which is why I questioned it.
Scroll up and check.
20% of the people post 80% of the misinformation
80% of the misinformation is posted by 20% of the people
Would you care to elaborate on the technical differences between the two statements or are you just being argumentative for some reason ?
Twist it whatever way you want, the Pareto principle is the 80/20 rule, not the 20/80 rule.
Technically, you got it wrong.
Now, about your source of the statistic for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Could you share it please? It would be great to finally put this to bed.
80/20
20/80
Is the same it’s just expressed differently
Like
A = B or B = A
The data is available on the ONS as previously stated.
Quite
So you can't quote the source?
It is ironic that you set out to mock 'antivaxxers' for spreading false or inaccurate information (misinformation), but ended up spreading false or inaccurate information yourself!
Hey lazy
90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021.
NHS England Vax stats pdf
Lazy? I've already quoted two sources which referred to the UK population aged 12 and over.
You've just quoted a source for adults (in England?)
NI Two still can't quote a source for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine."
Until that happens it is false or inaccurate information.
You repeated my source the ONS.
NI stated it was rounded up, also the ONS.
I've only seen that statistic on the ONS website for 'the UK population aged 12 years and over', not 'the population of the UK'.
Have you seen "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine", without adult or over 12 years old, on the ONS website?
93.6%
A featured snippet
Not the percentage, just 'UK population' e.g. without adult or over 12 years old."Again you're specifying what YOU want. What you want may not be available. Perhaps NI just didn't fully elaborate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Hey lazy 90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021. NHS England Vax stats pdf Lazy? I've already quoted two sources which referred to the UK population aged 12 and over. You've just quoted a source for adults (in England?) NI Two still can't quote a source for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine." Until that happens it is false or inaccurate information. You repeated my source the ONS. NI stated it was rounded up, also the ONS. I've only seen that statistic on the ONS website for 'the UK population aged 12 years and over', not 'the population of the UK'. Have you seen "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine", without adult or over 12 years old, on the ONS website? 93.6% A featured snippet Not the percentage, just 'UK population' e.g. without adult or over 12 years old. Again you're specifying what YOU want. What you want may not be available. Perhaps NI just didn't fully elaborate." Did it ever exist in the first place? If the 94% on the ONS website refers to the UK population 12 years and over who had received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, it is impossible then that 94% of population of the UK also received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Perhaps this is why NI hasn't 'fully elaborated'? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Hey lazy 90.1% of adults received first does of vaccine by October 2021. NHS England Vax stats pdf Lazy? I've already quoted two sources which referred to the UK population aged 12 and over. You've just quoted a source for adults (in England?) NI Two still can't quote a source for "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine." Until that happens it is false or inaccurate information. You repeated my source the ONS. NI stated it was rounded up, also the ONS. I've only seen that statistic on the ONS website for 'the UK population aged 12 years and over', not 'the population of the UK'. Have you seen "94% of the population of the UK had at least one (COVID-19) vaccine", without adult or over 12 years old, on the ONS website? 93.6% A featured snippet Not the percentage, just 'UK population' e.g. without adult or over 12 years old. Again you're specifying what YOU want. What you want may not be available. Perhaps NI just didn't fully elaborate. Did it ever exist in the first place? If the 94% on the ONS website refers to the UK population 12 years and over who had received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, it is impossible then that 94% of population of the UK also received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Perhaps this is why NI hasn't 'fully elaborated'?" No need to reply, it's not compulsory. Facts are there to be found. Have a nice day and enjoy the forums | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No Convid vaccines for me(Scott), caught it once in 2020 was back to normal 2 days later, had an anti body test twice over 12 months apart when work was trying to coerce me into having the fake vaccine, Gemma however was weak minded and had two jabs both coerced by the government(ironically illegal behaviour if done by the regulars but ok when they do it?) Gemma has had covid 5 times and has never been so sick with her other condition with frequent hospital trips for asthma, fail to see why I would regret not being a Guinea pig, side not I have had all my other vaccinations which are proven to stop me catching the diseases they protect against "You consider your partner to be weak minded? Because she made a choice you didn’t agree with? That’s is wild! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not getting the vaccine (touchy subject) " Only the dead ones and those still too ill to reply… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"She didn’t agree with it, but when the government threatened her job she wasn’t able to call the bluff " Still doesn't make her weak minded . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not getting the vaccine (touchy subject) " Glad I didn't "Trust the in science" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
