FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Would you have an mRNA vaccine?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you have an mRNA vaccine and under what circumstances? They'd been under development long before Covid appeared and could potentially treat many conditions. It's been predicted that they may be joined by a vaccine for cancers before 2030. How open would you be to having other mRNA vaccines? " I believe it's already been trialled for certain cancers in Belfast | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've too often wondered if those banging on about mRNA would take it if they have cancer down the line. " If it's a vaccine, presumably it'd have to be taken before the cancer occurred? Like they recommend HPV vaccines* before you become sexually active - because if you've already got it, it's too late. * I was a young adult when they were new, I'm not thinking about the age who get them now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've too often wondered if those banging on about mRNA would take it if they have cancer down the line. If it's a vaccine, presumably it'd have to be taken before the cancer occurred? Like they recommend HPV vaccines* before you become sexually active - because if you've already got it, it's too late. * I was a young adult when they were new, I'm not thinking about the age who get them now" It's immunotherapy rather than a vaccine. All cancers are different so they'll apparently biopsy the cancer, then repurpose the mRNA and teach that person's immune system to recognise the cancer. Biontech talk about personalised cancer care. I think it would still have to be treated along side other methods, chemo etc but would hopefully stop it coming back at the body would recognise it at an earlier stage. Is my understanding from following Biontech over the last year. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you have an mRNA vaccine and under what circumstances? They'd been under development long before Covid appeared and could potentially treat many conditions. It's been predicted that they may be joined by a vaccine for cancers before 2030. How open would you be to having other mRNA vaccines? I believe it's already been trialled for certain cancers in Belfast " I think there are or have been several trials, which is great news The Covid vaccines have helped manufacturers a lot, due to the large volumes of development and research achieved. Obviously it takes a lot to get from initial trials, potential revisions, further trials, evidence published and peer-reviewed, with possible government approvals to follow. Ordinarily, the majority of initial attempts won't get this far, of course. If I was very ill, without any currently available treatments, I would eagerly consider new treatments, including vaccines. I'd be hopeful of accessing vaccines under research trials, most certainly if I had an otherwise terminal prognosis. The mRNA Covid vaccines that have been used, fill me with hope for the future. If we get successful vaccines that degrade tumours etc, for some types of cancer, I'd hope that they would be more tolerable than some aggressive chemotherapy treatments and that they'd herald a new era in treatments for cancer that would expand. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've too often wondered if those banging on about mRNA would take it if they have cancer down the line. If it's a vaccine, presumably it'd have to be taken before the cancer occurred? Like they recommend HPV vaccines* before you become sexually active - because if you've already got it, it's too late. * I was a young adult when they were new, I'm not thinking about the age who get them now It's immunotherapy rather than a vaccine. All cancers are different so they'll apparently biopsy the cancer, then repurpose the mRNA and teach that person's immune system to recognise the cancer. Biontech talk about personalised cancer care. I think it would still have to be treated along side other methods, chemo etc but would hopefully stop it coming back at the body would recognise it at an earlier stage. Is my understanding from following Biontech over the last year. " Thanks for your insights Magneto | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i will not go through with jean therapy!!!!" What about chinos? G | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i will not go through with jean therapy!!!! What about chinos? G" Corduroy anyone? Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i will not go through with jean therapy!!!!" I'm sure we'd like jeans off you - probably boxers, too - it could be our jean therapy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i will not go through with jean therapy!!!!" You have to, it's impossible to get the right fit without it!! Slim, skinny, tapered, mine field these days. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i will not go through with jean therapy!!!!" Will that be the Jean Genie ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i will not go through with jean therapy!!!! You have to, it's impossible to get the right fit without it!! Slim, skinny, tapered, mine field these days. " There's even something called carrot fit now! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise." Well, aren't you just charming! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise. Well, aren't you just charming! " I am renowned for my honesty, frankness and forthrightness; I have had several long frustrating conversations with vaccine conspiracy theorists; their delusional opinions are astoundingly baseless, and they feed off each other's cr#p, and try to brainwash others who are foolish enough to believe them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you have an mRNA vaccine and under what circumstances? They'd been under development long before Covid appeared and could potentially treat many conditions. It's been predicted that they may be joined by a vaccine for cancers before 2030. How open would you be to having other mRNA vaccines? " Short answer, yes. Given the research currently under way and the idea than an mRNA treatment could be uniquely tailored to an individual is nothing short of a miracle. It's truly earth shattering. Imagine a treatment specifically sequenced for your own unique illness. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd take any medicine or therapeutic recommended by my doctor and passed by the MHRA or equivalent body. I've had four mRNA vaccines so far and am satisfied with the risk as seen in a global sample." I'm on my fifth shot n loving it. Having asmtha can't be too careful... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise. " Whenever I see things like this I remember the criticism from the 'why don't you get the vaccine, you're responsible for the death's of others' crowd and their pathetic pearl clutching, now those same people are wishing for the demise of others Covid promised so much and delivered so little, here's hoping it'll get you all | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise. Whenever I see things like this I remember the criticism from the 'why don't you get the vaccine, you're responsible for the death's of others' crowd and their pathetic pearl clutching, now those same people are wishing for the demise of others Covid promised so much and delivered so little, here's hoping it'll get you all " In fairness, there were loads more looking to round up the non vaxxed in camps, refusing them medical treatment, having their children taken off them and wishing them an early demise. This is peanuts compared to what was rife 18 months ago here and in the real world. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise. Whenever I see things like this I remember the criticism from the 'why don't you get the vaccine, you're responsible for the death's of others' crowd and their pathetic pearl clutching, now those same people are wishing for the demise of others Covid promised so much and delivered so little, here's hoping it'll get you all In fairness, there were loads more looking to round up the non vaxxed in camps, refusing them medical treatment, having their children taken off them and wishing them an early demise. This is peanuts compared to what was rife 18 months ago here and in the real world." I didnt see any of this tbh I just saw constant comparisons to Nazi Germany from anti vaxxers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are people so full of hatred, bitterness and nastyness. It's not what this site is about. Give your heads a wobble, if you don't like someone then block them and move on rather than spew hate filled garbage." Just before we nipped out to the pub last night glanced at the forums. Nastiness, bitterness, bile and angst. In the pub, laughter, contact, friendly company and inclusion. The real world is so much nicer. Only 4 weeks until we see all those lovely people in Gran Canaria, can't wait. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've too often wondered if those banging on about mRNA would take it if they have cancer down the line. " It would need to be far more effective than the current mRNA 'vaccines' that don't stop you catching, transmitting, being hospitalised or dying from the illness you're supposedly vaccinated against to even be worth considering | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you have an mRNA vaccine and under what circumstances? They'd been under development long before Covid appeared and could potentially treat many conditions. It's been predicted that they may be joined by a vaccine for cancers before 2030. How open would you be to having other mRNA vaccines? " No thanks, I survived this far with my immune system intact & don't intend to change that at anytime in the future. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" In fairness, there were loads more looking to round up the non vaxxed in camps, refusing them medical treatment, having their children taken off them and wishing them an early demise. This is peanuts compared to what was rife 18 months ago here and in the real world. I didnt see any of this tbh I just saw constant comparisons to Nazi Germany from anti vaxxers." You must have had your head buried firmly in the sand then, there was a constant stream of so called celebrities demonising those that chose not to be jabbed & that's on top of the Gov't campaigns of 'Get vaccinated to protect others' when it's now been admitted the jabs don't stop transmission. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd take any medicine or therapeutic recommended by my doctor and passed by the MHRA or equivalent body. I've had four mRNA vaccines so far and am satisfied with the risk as seen in a global sample." 100% I would add… we ALL die sometime of something, I am not going to spend my life running in fear of an infinitesimally small body of “evidence” to prolong a life of running in fear. I’d take fewer years in blissful happiness and a day in bitter anger of whatever of whomever may be controlling my happiness. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Why not just set a precedent and not have the vaccine, your choice, and allow others a choice ? There's really no difference in the nastiness trying to convince people not to have it as trying to convince them to have it, especially when lies and stupidity are the only weapons in the arsenal. Advising people to look at the pros and cons is fine, trying to tell the it doesn't work just makes people look stupid. " Unfortunately asking people to be reasonable doesn't always work. G | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've too often wondered if those banging on about mRNA would take it if they have cancer down the line. It would need to be far more effective than the current mRNA 'vaccines' that don't stop you catching, transmitting, being hospitalised or dying from the illness you're supposedly vaccinated against to even be worth considering " The covid vaccine does prevent you from hospitalisation and death though It also played a hand in preventing transmission. There are various studies out there proving this too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you have an mRNA vaccine and under what circumstances? They'd been under development long before Covid appeared and could potentially treat many conditions. It's been predicted that they may be joined by a vaccine for cancers before 2030. How open would you be to having other mRNA vaccines? No thanks, I survived this far with my immune system intact & don't intend to change that at anytime in the future." You haven't been vaccinated against measles, mumps, rubella, polio, smallbox? Never had a tetanus shot? Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you have an mRNA vaccine and under what circumstances? They'd been under development long before Covid appeared and could potentially treat many conditions. It's been predicted that they may be joined by a vaccine for cancers before 2030. How open would you be to having other mRNA vaccines? No thanks, I survived this far with my immune system intact & don't intend to change that at anytime in the future." Our immune systems typically degrade in effectiveness as we age, so it can be a fallacy to assume that how it had been for us whilst younger, is the same it will be as we age. Cancers can also establish at any age and we'll often not be aware of them until it's very late. Most people would not then just rely on how their health and immune systems had been whilst younger, to assume that they should just trust in their past form. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've too often wondered if those banging on about mRNA would take it if they have cancer down the line. It would need to be far more effective than the current mRNA 'vaccines' that don't stop you catching, transmitting, being hospitalised or dying from the illness you're supposedly vaccinated against to even be worth considering The covid vaccine does prevent you from hospitalisation and death though It also played a hand in preventing transmission. There are various studies out there proving this too." Have you seen the ONS data for this year ? 93% of covid deaths were vaccinated despite only 70% of the population being vaccinated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've too often wondered if those banging on about mRNA would take it if they have cancer down the line. It would need to be far more effective than the current mRNA 'vaccines' that don't stop you catching, transmitting, being hospitalised or dying from the illness you're supposedly vaccinated against to even be worth considering The covid vaccine does prevent you from hospitalisation and death though It also played a hand in preventing transmission. There are various studies out there proving this too. Have you seen the ONS data for this year ? 93% of covid deaths were vaccinated despite only 70% of the population being vaccinated. " Really not sure what your trying to achieve by taking stats out of context, are you assuming someone might be stupid enough to think that's supporting your agenda? Maybe you'd like someone to explain in simple terms how the statistics you are fond of actually proves that the vaccine has saved millions lives ? I guess not because you already but are afraid to admit it !! Get it don't get it ... Nobody cares | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've too often wondered if those banging on about mRNA would take it if they have cancer down the line. It would need to be far more effective than the current mRNA 'vaccines' that don't stop you catching, transmitting, being hospitalised or dying from the illness you're supposedly vaccinated against to even be worth considering The covid vaccine does prevent you from hospitalisation and death though It also played a hand in preventing transmission. There are various studies out there proving this too. Have you seen the ONS data for this year ? 93% of covid deaths were vaccinated despite only 70% of the population being vaccinated. " But is that because it was the higher risk groups that got vaccinated first, so a higher proportion of those people were vaccinated? G | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Dr Robert Malone, one of the people responsible for the development of MRNA vaccines doesn't think it's a good idea, so, no, I dont think I will." Please try and be original, that was also debunked in 2020 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Dr Robert Malone, one of the people responsible for the development of MRNA vaccines doesn't think it's a good idea, so, no, I dont think I will." Dr R Malone is a bitter and twisted person who was NOT responsible for development of the MRNA in the same way that paying your taxes does not give you a claim to pushing Russian forces out of Ukraine. He work, with others, on a minor part of something a long time ago that vaguely resembles the process used in vaccinations. More importantly, not only are the other scientists involved at the time, not claiming to have invented the vaccine but are actively refuting his own self aggrandising claims. If you’re going to throw his name around like that then you may as well be saying Jeffrey Dahmer was a people person. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are people so full of hatred, bitterness and nastyness. It's not what this site is about. Give your heads a wobble, if you don't like someone then block them and move on rather than spew hate filled garbage. Just before we nipped out to the pub last night glanced at the forums. Nastiness, bitterness, bile and angst. In the pub, laughter, contact, friendly company and inclusion. The real world is so much nicer. Only 4 weeks until we see all those lovely people in Gran Canaria, can't wait. " Maybe see you there xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"what sort of question is that ??? Of course .... it s killed many old people who went in for routine operations , then died of surgical wounds and blood poisoning that not healed up due to this .... " Just a question here are you saying that covid has caused the wounds to not close properly or the vaccine? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are people so full of hatred, bitterness and nastyness. It's not what this site is about. Give your heads a wobble, if you don't like someone then block them and move on rather than spew hate filled garbage. Just before we nipped out to the pub last night glanced at the forums. Nastiness, bitterness, bile and angst. In the pub, laughter, contact, friendly company and inclusion. The real world is so much nicer. Only 4 weeks until we see all those lovely people in Gran Canaria, can't wait. Maybe see you there xx" Yes, see you there. I'll be the one wearing several masks and having a couple of syringes dangling from my arms. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are people so full of hatred, bitterness and nastyness. It's not what this site is about. Give your heads a wobble, if you don't like someone then block them and move on rather than spew hate filled garbage. Just before we nipped out to the pub last night glanced at the forums. Nastiness, bitterness, bile and angst. In the pub, laughter, contact, friendly company and inclusion. The real world is so much nicer. Only 4 weeks until we see all those lovely people in Gran Canaria, can't wait. Maybe see you there xx" Yes, see you there. I'll be the one wearing several masks and having a couple of syringes dangling from my arms. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are people so full of hatred, bitterness and nastyness. It's not what this site is about. Give your heads a wobble, if you don't like someone then block them and move on rather than spew hate filled garbage. Just before we nipped out to the pub last night glanced at the forums. Nastiness, bitterness, bile and angst. In the pub, laughter, contact, friendly company and inclusion. The real world is so much nicer. Only 4 weeks until we see all those lovely people in Gran Canaria, can't wait. Maybe see you there xx Yes, see you there. I'll be the one wearing several masks and having a couple of syringes dangling from my arms. " We'll be the ones wearing nothing but a smile | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shove all the vaccines " That's not how they are taken... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shove all the vaccines " That's what happens, they shove them into your arm. If you're a very brave boy, you'll get a lollipop too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shove all the vaccines That's what happens, they shove them into your arm. If you're a very brave boy, you'll get a lollipop too. " Based on his last post, he'll be busy shoving all the vaccines up his bum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shove all the vaccines " Please just have 1, not all of them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nope I'm in the control group! " Me too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shove all the vaccines " But your profile says "risks aren't risks unless you take them" or some other such nonsense. Surely, an adventurous, risk taking, dynamic fella like yourself would be fearless and indestructible. Oh, hang on, been on over 12 months and no verified meets, not risky enough for you these clubs, parties and socials. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise. " two more medals please and a round of applause ??; well done you,a great example of social responsibility and caring for others | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise. two more medals please and a round of applause ??; well done you,a great example of social responsibility and caring for others " Wearing a mask, social distancing and getting vaccinated are all great examples of social responsibility and caring for others. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t go near them, Scientists have found irreversible effects from inoculations, one only has to look around and see the fatalities in professional sports to see what’s going on, the lipid nano particles are taking the spike proteins past the blood brain barrier, vials containing the inoculation under a dark field microscope show sone very interesting things too which shouldn’t be in there, my mate had his booster earlier in the year too and the next day he dropped down on site at work, thankfully he was working at the hospital, he had suffered a severe sub cranial haemorrhage he was in a coma for two months now He is learning to walk again, the drs told him it was vaccine induced. I can only think is a Wider agenda here and it has f@*k all to do with a virus " So many words, so little fact | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t go near them, Scientists have found irreversible effects from inoculations, one only has to look around and see the fatalities in professional sports to see what’s going on, the lipid nano particles are taking the spike proteins past the blood brain barrier, vials containing the inoculation under a dark field microscope show sone very interesting things too which shouldn’t be in there, my mate had his booster earlier in the year too and the next day he dropped down on site at work, thankfully he was working at the hospital, he had suffered a severe sub cranial haemorrhage he was in a coma for two months now He is learning to walk again, the drs told him it was vaccine induced. I can only think is a Wider agenda here and it has f@*k all to do with a virus " Please keep replies to the forum, sending us bollox by message isn’t appropriate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t go near them, Scientists have found irreversible effects from inoculations, one only has to look around and see the fatalities in professional sports to see what’s going on, the lipid nano particles are taking the spike proteins past the blood brain barrier, vials containing the inoculation under a dark field microscope show sone very interesting things too which shouldn’t be in there, my mate had his booster earlier in the year too and the next day he dropped down on site at work, thankfully he was working at the hospital, he had suffered a severe sub cranial haemorrhage he was in a coma for two months now He is learning to walk again, the drs told him it was vaccine induced. I can only think is a Wider agenda here and it has f@*k all to do with a virus So many words, so little fact " This. ^^^ Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You sent me a message, but if your here to play games, how about you download the black and red (hidden Bluetooth) app from the store it’s free, then we can play the experiment game, and we can all bicker around the results of the experiment can’t we, I can show you scientific study’s done on this, it is far from a joke, the max addresses are unjoinable too which is weird they have a self defence mechanism, there is a man by the name of klaus schwalbe, sadly he want to make transhumanism a thing, and sorry to say you are the volunteers wether you like it or not " We didn’t send you a message, we responded to your utterly ridiculous forum post, try and get your facts right. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise. two more medals please and a round of applause ??; well done you,a great example of social responsibility and caring for others Wearing a mask, social distancing and getting vaccinated are all great examples of social responsibility and caring for others. Winston " Yes make sure you wear your seat belt if you don't mine won't work | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You sent me a message, but if your here to play games, how about you download the black and red (hidden Bluetooth) app from the store it’s free, then we can play the experiment game, and we can all bicker around the results of the experiment can’t we, I can show you scientific study’s done on this, it is far from a joke, the max addresses are unjoinable too which is weird they have a self defence mechanism, there is a man by the name of klaus schwalbe, sadly he want to make transhumanism a thing, and sorry to say you are the volunteers wether you like it or not " It amuses me no end that those who refused covid vaccines are now in the control group. The irony normally escapes them. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t go near them, Scientists have found irreversible effects from inoculations, one only has to look around and see the fatalities in professional sports to see what’s going on, the lipid nano particles are taking the spike proteins past the blood brain barrier, vials containing the inoculation under a dark field microscope show sone very interesting things too which shouldn’t be in there, my mate had his booster earlier in the year too and the next day he dropped down on site at work, thankfully he was working at the hospital, he had suffered a severe sub cranial haemorrhage he was in a coma for two months now He is learning to walk again, the drs told him it was vaccine induced. I can only think is a Wider agenda here and it has f@*k all to do with a virus So many words, so little fact This. ^^^ Winston " ^^^ baaaaaa | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t go near them, Scientists have found irreversible effects from inoculations, one only has to look around and see the fatalities in professional sports to see what’s going on, the lipid nano particles are taking the spike proteins past the blood brain barrier, vials containing the inoculation under a dark field microscope show sone very interesting things too which shouldn’t be in there, my mate had his booster earlier in the year too and the next day he dropped down on site at work, thankfully he was working at the hospital, he had suffered a severe sub cranial haemorrhage he was in a coma for two months now He is learning to walk again, the drs told him it was vaccine induced. I can only think is a Wider agenda here and it has f@*k all to do with a virus So many words, so little fact This. ^^^ Winston ^^^ baaaaaa " How 2020 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t go near them, Scientists have found irreversible effects from inoculations, one only has to look around and see the fatalities in professional sports to see what’s going on, the lipid nano particles are taking the spike proteins past the blood brain barrier, vials containing the inoculation under a dark field microscope show sone very interesting things too which shouldn’t be in there, my mate had his booster earlier in the year too and the next day he dropped down on site at work, thankfully he was working at the hospital, he had suffered a severe sub cranial haemorrhage he was in a coma for two months now He is learning to walk again, the drs told him it was vaccine induced. I can only think is a Wider agenda here and it has f@*k all to do with a virus So many words, so little fact This. ^^^ Winston ^^^ baaaaaa " I have questions; When you studied for your 3 PHD'S in Epidemiology, Physics and Biology did you express the same opinions to your tutors as you do here? Or..... When you studied for your 3 PHD'S in Epidemiology, Physics and Biology did your tutors not teach you how vaccines work? Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t go near them, Scientists have found irreversible effects from inoculations, one only has to look around and see the fatalities in professional sports to see what’s going on, the lipid nano particles are taking the spike proteins past the blood brain barrier, vials containing the inoculation under a dark field microscope show sone very interesting things too which shouldn’t be in there, my mate had his booster earlier in the year too and the next day he dropped down on site at work, thankfully he was working at the hospital, he had suffered a severe sub cranial haemorrhage he was in a coma for two months now He is learning to walk again, the drs told him it was vaccine induced. I can only think is a Wider agenda here and it has f@*k all to do with a virus So many words, so little fact This. ^^^ Winston ^^^ baaaaaa How 2020 " I don't think the sheeple insult is quite the insult people think it it. When there's a wolf about the sheep group together for mutual protection. It's the weak, the lame and the stupid that ignore the safety of the group and end up attacked by the wolf. I'm happy to be a sheeple. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The institute that founded your holy grail of knowledge also founded the holy grail of pharmaceuticals, you do understand that people that have never had a vaccine from birth are a hell of a lot healthier than those that have had on, and to the question of what is a vaccine, mRNA has never been used in Gunn’s before in not sure if you know the inns and outs of what actually goes inside the body after you consent to being injected with it but it Is far from what a vaccine in the pre MRNA is trust me, it splices your dna and edits the code, that code is natural, we are a miracle and kissing about with it is not something you really want to be going trust me" are you trying to suggest that the vaccines somehow edits our dna?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pfizer executive admits that the covid vaccine was tested for transmission, it doesn’t stop it spreading? WAIT that’s why we’ll got it didn’t we? " No. Hope this helps | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you have an mRNA vaccine and under what circumstances? They'd been under development long before Covid appeared and could potentially treat many conditions. It's been predicted that they may be joined by a vaccine for cancers before 2030. How open would you be to having other mRNA vaccines? " Why wouldn’t you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The institute that founded your holy grail of knowledge also founded the holy grail of pharmaceuticals, you do understand that people that have never had a vaccine from birth are a hell of a lot healthier than those that have had on, and to the question of what is a vaccine, mRNA has never been used in Gunn’s before in not sure if you know the inns and outs of what actually goes inside the body after you consent to being injected with it but it Is far from what a vaccine in the pre MRNA is trust me, it splices your dna and edits the code, that code is natural, we are a miracle and kissing about with it is not something you really want to be going trust meare you trying to suggest that the vaccines somehow edits our dna?? " DNA is the acronym for the National Dyslexic Association. Not a lot of people know that. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The institute that founded your holy grail of knowledge also founded the holy grail of pharmaceuticals, you do understand that people that have never had a vaccine from birth are a hell of a lot healthier than those that have had on, and to the question of what is a vaccine, mRNA has never been used in Gunn’s before in not sure if you know the inns and outs of what actually goes inside the body after you consent to being injected with it but it Is far from what a vaccine in the pre MRNA is trust me, it splices your dna and edits the code, that code is natural, we are a miracle and kissing about with it is not something you really want to be going trust me" I assume you are not a scientist and that also, you do not understand mRNA or DNA. I appreciate it isn’t an easy thing to understand without the background, I’m pretty rusty on it myself. But you are totally wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t go near them, Scientists have found irreversible effects from inoculations, one only has to look around and see the fatalities in professional sports to see what’s going on, the lipid nano particles are taking the spike proteins past the blood brain barrier, vials containing the inoculation under a dark field microscope show sone very interesting things too which shouldn’t be in there, my mate had his booster earlier in the year too and the next day he dropped down on site at work, thankfully he was working at the hospital, he had suffered a severe sub cranial haemorrhage he was in a coma for two months now He is learning to walk again, the drs told him it was vaccine induced. I can only think is a Wider agenda here and it has f@*k all to do with a virus So many words, so little fact This. ^^^ Winston ^^^ baaaaaa I have questions; When you studied for your 3 PHD'S in Epidemiology, Physics and Biology did you express the same opinions to your tutors as you do here? Or..... When you studied for your 3 PHD'S in Epidemiology, Physics and Biology did your tutors not teach you how vaccines work? Winston " True vaccines yes, and the sheeple reference is how people just follow the herd there is no wolf among the sheep for "mutual protection" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The institute that founded your holy grail of knowledge also founded the holy grail of pharmaceuticals, you do understand that people that have never had a vaccine from birth are a hell of a lot healthier than those that have had on, and to the question of what is a vaccine, mRNA has never been used in Gunn’s before in not sure if you know the inns and outs of what actually goes inside the body after you consent to being injected with it but it Is far from what a vaccine in the pre MRNA is trust me, it splices your dna and edits the code, that code is natural, we are a miracle and kissing about with it is not something you really want to be going trust me" "People who have never had a vaccine... are healthier than those that have had on(e)" You're aware that several millions of lives are saved each year by vaccination? I don't think millions of dead people could accurately be described as healthier than the vaccinated living! Would you prefer that Smallpox hadn't been eradicated by vaccination? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People that aren’t vaccinated are much healthier it’s a fact, ask a dr if he has ever seen a kid with autism that isn’t vaccinated, not sure how much research you’ve done into the increase of disease over the years which funnily enough coincides with the introduction of vaccines but it’s Speaks volumes, god only knows how we survived millions of years without a vaccine, as our natural immunity couldn’t fight anything of could it " I've filled my bingo card, everyone. Autism. Good fucking grief | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People that aren’t vaccinated are much healthier it’s a fact, ask a dr if he has ever seen a kid with autism that isn’t vaccinated, not sure how much research you’ve done into the increase of disease over the years which funnily enough coincides with the introduction of vaccines but it’s Speaks volumes, god only knows how we survived millions of years without a vaccine, as our natural immunity couldn’t fight anything of could it I've filled my bingo card, everyone. Autism. Good fucking grief " The level of ignorance and stupidity in this thread has filled a few Forum Bingo cards. Repeating oarrot fashion, the totally false. Autism trope, shows the power of propaganda and how easily some are swayed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People that aren’t vaccinated are much healthier it’s a fact, ask a dr if he has ever seen a kid with autism that isn’t vaccinated, not sure how much research you’ve done into the increase of disease over the years which funnily enough coincides with the introduction of vaccines but it’s Speaks volumes, god only knows how we survived millions of years without a vaccine, as our natural immunity couldn’t fight anything of could it I've filled my bingo card, everyone. Autism. Good fucking grief The level of ignorance and stupidity in this thread has filled a few Forum Bingo cards. Repeating oarrot fashion, the totally false. Autism trope, shows the power of propaganda and how easily some are swayed. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t go near them, Scientists have found irreversible effects from inoculations, one only has to look around and see the fatalities in professional sports to see what’s going on, the lipid nano particles are taking the spike proteins past the blood brain barrier, vials containing the inoculation under a dark field microscope show sone very interesting things too which shouldn’t be in there, my mate had his booster earlier in the year too and the next day he dropped down on site at work, thankfully he was working at the hospital, he had suffered a severe sub cranial haemorrhage he was in a coma for two months now He is learning to walk again, the drs told him it was vaccine induced. I can only think is a Wider agenda here and it has f@*k all to do with a virus So many words, so little fact This. ^^^ Winston ^^^ baaaaaa I have questions; When you studied for your 3 PHD'S in Epidemiology, Physics and Biology did you express the same opinions to your tutors as you do here? Or..... When you studied for your 3 PHD'S in Epidemiology, Physics and Biology did your tutors not teach you how vaccines work? Winston True vaccines yes, and the sheeple reference is how people just follow the herd there is no wolf among the sheep for "mutual protection" " You studied "True" vaccines for your 3 PHD'S in Epidemiology, Physics and Biology? What are "true" vaccines? The wolf in my analogy is Covid. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People that aren’t vaccinated are much healthier it’s a fact, ask a dr if he has ever seen a kid with autism that isn’t vaccinated, not sure how much research you’ve done into the increase of disease over the years which funnily enough coincides with the introduction of vaccines but it’s Speaks volumes, god only knows how we survived millions of years without a vaccine, as our natural immunity couldn’t fight anything of could it " The original vaccine = autism link was made by a Doctor with a research pool of 12 children. He's since been struck of and his work wholly discredited. Since then over a million children have been studied for links to vaccines and Autism. Not a single link or case has been found. You're welcome. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People that aren’t vaccinated are much healthier it’s a fact, ask a dr if he has ever seen a kid with autism that isn’t vaccinated, not sure how much research you’ve done into the increase of disease over the years which funnily enough coincides with the introduction of vaccines but it’s Speaks volumes, god only knows how we survived millions of years without a vaccine, as our natural immunity couldn’t fight anything of could it " Natural immunity did a great job for the plague and influenza in 1918. Increase in autism is down to autism diagnosis improving - take a minute to feel for those who did not get the right support in their childhood and life and were seen to be just a trouble maker. The link between jabs and autism is weak, the study you refer to is of 12 children and has been proven to be wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lambs to the Slaughter, enjoy the ride. " Siri, ask me how this is going in five years | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There have been 4,773 batches administered in uk and 47,707 batches administered globally, the deadliest batch in the uk has 3223 adverse reactions, a death toll of 58, 361 disability’s and 124 life threatening illnesses, that’s one batch out of 4773. We are still in the first stage of this trial and the statistics are shocking every other vaccine was sheaves after a few deaths except this one which got pumped out on a global scale, and how they managed to produce that amount of vaccines in such a small amount of time really amazes me as it’s not a simple process you have to isolate the virus, can someone show me evidence please if the virus being isolated " You mention 'evidence', which is clearly lacking in your rambling word salad. The scientific literature is full of an abundance of peer-reviewed evidence and is the arena to learn from, so that the antivax propaganda is trashed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA." except it doesn't have any in it.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA. except it doesn't have any in it.... " These posts just get more funny. The inaccuracy of details that are easily verifiable are ridiculous. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA. except it doesn't have any in it.... These posts just get more funny. The inaccuracy of details that are easily verifiable are ridiculous. Winston " thing is because or nonsense like this my daughter nearly lost her life and her baby xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA." I thought that was MMR? At least these arguments are eco friendly with all the recycling | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA. except it doesn't have any in it.... These posts just get more funny. The inaccuracy of details that are easily verifiable are ridiculous. Winston thing is because or nonsense like this my daughter nearly lost her life and her baby xx " I'm glad she made the right decisions, despite the lunatic fringe. At least in the States they're starting to take action against conspiracy loons. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA." There’s no dead baby tissue in it but anyway if your that afraid then best not take any medication for anything as it all has the potential to cause illnesses and in extreme cases death. Paracetamol, aspirin, ect | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA." Full ingredient list; ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) ALC-0159 = 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine cholesterol potassium chloride potassium dihydrogen phosphate sodium chloride disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate sucrose Nope, no dead baby tissue. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA. Full ingredient list; ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) ALC-0159 = 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine cholesterol potassium chloride potassium dihydrogen phosphate sodium chloride disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate sucrose Nope, no dead baby tissue. Winston " What about that horrendous killer dihydrogen monoxide? I hear that the World Economic Forum approves of giving this to... children. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA. Full ingredient list; ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) ALC-0159 = 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine cholesterol potassium chloride potassium dihydrogen phosphate sodium chloride disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate sucrose Nope, no dead baby tissue. Winston What about that horrendous killer dihydrogen monoxide? I hear that the World Economic Forum approves of giving this to... children." *wails...... Will somebody think of the children...... Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA. Full ingredient list; ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) ALC-0159 = 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine cholesterol potassium chloride potassium dihydrogen phosphate sodium chloride disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate sucrose Nope, no dead baby tissue. Winston What about that horrendous killer dihydrogen monoxide? I hear that the World Economic Forum approves of giving this to... children. *wails...... Will somebody think of the children...... Winston " Will the globalists never be stopped? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA." Horse shit it too nice a term for this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA." It's great in these difficult times to have a smile put on your face, isn't it - which word salad nonsense always does | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA. It's great in these difficult times to have a smile put on your face, isn't it - which word salad nonsense always does " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it kills 1 person it's not safe......we have thousands dead its not that hard maths. Also, the UK has its highest-ever count of unexplained deaths right now. Dead baby tissue is another name for the mRNA." Please note us females are more likely to die from taking the pill then the COVID jab. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? " Well let's not bother to cure anything then. Back to the dark ages we go. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? " Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Watching people on this thread play with science is a bit like watching someone else's child play with scissors, you shouldn't find it funny but oh lordy....." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Watching people on this thread play with science is a bit like watching someone else's child play with scissors, you shouldn't find it funny but oh lordy....." Love it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston " Yes. Three generations of my family hadn't been born yet at that stage - scientific processes and safeguards have changed significantly (including as a result of that tragedy) in *three generations*. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever is available I will take it; I goty winter fly jab free of charge at Boots today, and will get the next Covid jab when it becomes available. I feel very blessed to be living in this present era where medical technology is providing proven,tested solutions to potentially life threatening conditions. If the medical conspiracy theorist nutjobs refuse to engage with these new technologies, may their stupidity hasten their demise. Well, aren't you just charming! I am renowned for my honesty, frankness and forthrightness; I have had several long frustrating conversations with vaccine conspiracy theorists; their delusional opinions are astoundingly baseless, and they feed off each other's cr#p, and try to brainwash others who are foolish enough to believe them." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston " Do you think when they administered thalidomide they also felt it was safe and had been properly tested? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you have an mRNA vaccine and under what circumstances? They'd been under development long before Covid appeared and could potentially treat many conditions. It's been predicted that they may be joined by a vaccine for cancers before 2030. How open would you be to having other mRNA vaccines? " If the science is sound I'll have them. They could be a key breakthrough for cancer for instance | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would you have an mRNA vaccine and under what circumstances? They'd been under development long before Covid appeared and could potentially treat many conditions. It's been predicted that they may be joined by a vaccine for cancers before 2030. How open would you be to having other mRNA vaccines? If the science is sound I'll have them. They could be a key breakthrough for cancer for instance " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston Do you think when they administered thalidomide they also felt it was safe and had been properly tested? " I do and I do. I'm also capable of grasping that lessons were learnt and more rigorous research, testing and licensing are now in place. The only bit of good news that came out of the whole tragedy. Because Thalidomide was such a tragedy it's still "fresh" in our minds. We forget that it was 65 years ago and whether we choose to believe it or not, science has moved on immeasurably in those 65 years. Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston Do you think when they administered thalidomide they also felt it was safe and had been properly tested? I do and I do. I'm also capable of grasping that lessons were learnt and more rigorous research, testing and licensing are now in place. The only bit of good news that came out of the whole tragedy. Because Thalidomide was such a tragedy it's still "fresh" in our minds. We forget that it was 65 years ago and whether we choose to believe it or not, science has moved on immeasurably in those 65 years. Winston " I don't doubt we know more now than we did 65 years ago. Do you think at the time the experts then were of the opinion that science had moved on immeasurably in their previous 65 years also? Or has "science" only been progressing in the last 65 years? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I don't doubt we know more now than we did 65 years ago. Do you think at the time the experts then were of the opinion that science had moved on immeasurably in their previous 65 years also? Or has "science" only been progressing in the last 65 years? " You're probably right. Hold on,I'll check the internet.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston Do you think when they administered thalidomide they also felt it was safe and had been properly tested? I do and I do. I'm also capable of grasping that lessons were learnt and more rigorous research, testing and licensing are now in place. The only bit of good news that came out of the whole tragedy. Because Thalidomide was such a tragedy it's still "fresh" in our minds. We forget that it was 65 years ago and whether we choose to believe it or not, science has moved on immeasurably in those 65 years. Winston I don't doubt we know more now than we did 65 years ago. Do you think at the time the experts then were of the opinion that science had moved on immeasurably in their previous 65 years also? Or has "science" only been progressing in the last 65 years? " In my scientific discovery accelerates with 65 is a very very long time in modern science. The thalidomide problem came from a lack of understanding of. chirality. One isomer was safe the other not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston Do you think when they administered thalidomide they also felt it was safe and had been properly tested? I do and I do. I'm also capable of grasping that lessons were learnt and more rigorous research, testing and licensing are now in place. The only bit of good news that came out of the whole tragedy. Because Thalidomide was such a tragedy it's still "fresh" in our minds. We forget that it was 65 years ago and whether we choose to believe it or not, science has moved on immeasurably in those 65 years. Winston I don't doubt we know more now than we did 65 years ago. Do you think at the time the experts then were of the opinion that science had moved on immeasurably in their previous 65 years also? Or has "science" only been progressing in the last 65 years? " We think we know more and we know better, we believe we know more too, yet without proper controls we are entering into a era of great unknown of dna manipulation , genetically modified food, and a world of less human connectivity, 65 years ago was an era of great unknown and before that - yes it’s progress but progress to what, what are we progressing to? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston Do you think when they administered thalidomide they also felt it was safe and had been properly tested? I do and I do. I'm also capable of grasping that lessons were learnt and more rigorous research, testing and licensing are now in place. The only bit of good news that came out of the whole tragedy. Because Thalidomide was such a tragedy it's still "fresh" in our minds. We forget that it was 65 years ago and whether we choose to believe it or not, science has moved on immeasurably in those 65 years. Winston I don't doubt we know more now than we did 65 years ago. Do you think at the time the experts then were of the opinion that science had moved on immeasurably in their previous 65 years also? Or has "science" only been progressing in the last 65 years? We think we know more and we know better, we believe we know more too, yet without proper controls we are entering into a era of great unknown of dna manipulation , genetically modified food, and a world of less human connectivity, 65 years ago was an era of great unknown and before that - yes it’s progress but progress to what, what are we progressing to? " I find the unwavering arrogance that we know all we need to know worrying. It's like we don't seem to learn from mistakes. Take thalidomide. Introduced in 1953 and considered safe. Birth defects and issues not noted until 8 years later in 1961. But it was safe. One can imagine the dissenting voices being treated as fools in the same way as those who challenge some of the findings. Yes regulations and processes may have been improved since then. But I'm sure at the time they were considered sufficient to launch the product. When there are vast somes of money to be made and political maneuvering people don't always follow "the process" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston Do you think when they administered thalidomide they also felt it was safe and had been properly tested? I do and I do. I'm also capable of grasping that lessons were learnt and more rigorous research, testing and licensing are now in place. The only bit of good news that came out of the whole tragedy. Because Thalidomide was such a tragedy it's still "fresh" in our minds. We forget that it was 65 years ago and whether we choose to believe it or not, science has moved on immeasurably in those 65 years. Winston I don't doubt we know more now than we did 65 years ago. Do you think at the time the experts then were of the opinion that science had moved on immeasurably in their previous 65 years also? Or has "science" only been progressing in the last 65 years? We think we know more and we know better, we believe we know more too, yet without proper controls we are entering into a era of great unknown of dna manipulation , genetically modified food, and a world of less human connectivity, 65 years ago was an era of great unknown and before that - yes it’s progress but progress to what, what are we progressing to? I find the unwavering arrogance that we know all we need to know worrying. It's like we don't seem to learn from mistakes. Take thalidomide. Introduced in 1953 and considered safe. Birth defects and issues not noted until 8 years later in 1961. But it was safe. One can imagine the dissenting voices being treated as fools in the same way as those who challenge some of the findings. Yes regulations and processes may have been improved since then. But I'm sure at the time they were considered sufficient to launch the product. When there are vast somes of money to be made and political maneuvering people don't always follow "the process" " What I read above is "we're doing better, which is an ongoing process". If you see that as arrogance, I'm not sure you understand the process. Everyone is just doing their best and trying to make the best decisions. What's "their best" continues to improve. The fact we have to reach back before my parents were born to find such a disaster actually speaks to the improvements that have been made since then. But who knows. Maybe in 100 years we'll find out that mobile phones turn us all blue. Best stop using them, lest we be considered arrogant for trusting current safety protocols. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? " mRNA (Messenger RiboNucliec Acid) vaccines do not effect a cells DNA (DeoxyriboNucleic Acid) or even a cells RNA (RiboNucliec Acid). In a somewhat simplified explanation, RNA in a cell tells a cell how to make specific proteins that a cell needs for whatever function it has in your body by issuing chemical messages. mRNA is simply a chemical message that will tell the cell to produce proteins for a very limited but vulnerable part of the virus that you want to protect the body from. When the cell has produced the proteins they are released into the body where the proteins are detected as foreign my the immune system and antibodies created. At same time, as the cell releases the proteins into the body the cell itself dies, destroying the mRNA within it as it does so. At no point is the genetic makeup (RNA or DNA) of either the cell, body or person changed in anyway at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston Do you think when they administered thalidomide they also felt it was safe and had been properly tested? I do and I do. I'm also capable of grasping that lessons were learnt and more rigorous research, testing and licensing are now in place. The only bit of good news that came out of the whole tragedy. Because Thalidomide was such a tragedy it's still "fresh" in our minds. We forget that it was 65 years ago and whether we choose to believe it or not, science has moved on immeasurably in those 65 years. Winston I don't doubt we know more now than we did 65 years ago. Do you think at the time the experts then were of the opinion that science had moved on immeasurably in their previous 65 years also? Or has "science" only been progressing in the last 65 years? We think we know more and we know better, we believe we know more too, yet without proper controls we are entering into a era of great unknown of dna manipulation , genetically modified food, and a world of less human connectivity, 65 years ago was an era of great unknown and before that - yes it’s progress but progress to what, what are we progressing to? I find the unwavering arrogance that we know all we need to know worrying. It's like we don't seem to learn from mistakes. Take thalidomide. Introduced in 1953 and considered safe. Birth defects and issues not noted until 8 years later in 1961. But it was safe. One can imagine the dissenting voices being treated as fools in the same way as those who challenge some of the findings. Yes regulations and processes may have been improved since then. But I'm sure at the time they were considered sufficient to launch the product. When there are vast somes of money to be made and political maneuvering people don't always follow "the process" What I read above is "we're doing better, which is an ongoing process". If you see that as arrogance, I'm not sure you understand the process. Everyone is just doing their best and trying to make the best decisions. What's "their best" continues to improve. The fact we have to reach back before my parents were born to find such a disaster actually speaks to the improvements that have been made since then. But who knows. Maybe in 100 years we'll find out that mobile phones turn us all blue. Best stop using them, lest we be considered arrogant for trusting current safety protocols." We've been using mobiles for 30 odd years. It's a silly comparison. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? Thalidomide was tragic. It was also 1957. I think we've moved on a bit since then. Thank fuck. Winston Do you think when they administered thalidomide they also felt it was safe and had been properly tested? I do and I do. I'm also capable of grasping that lessons were learnt and more rigorous research, testing and licensing are now in place. The only bit of good news that came out of the whole tragedy. Because Thalidomide was such a tragedy it's still "fresh" in our minds. We forget that it was 65 years ago and whether we choose to believe it or not, science has moved on immeasurably in those 65 years. Winston I don't doubt we know more now than we did 65 years ago. Do you think at the time the experts then were of the opinion that science had moved on immeasurably in their previous 65 years also? Or has "science" only been progressing in the last 65 years? We think we know more and we know better, we believe we know more too, yet without proper controls we are entering into a era of great unknown of dna manipulation , genetically modified food, and a world of less human connectivity, 65 years ago was an era of great unknown and before that - yes it’s progress but progress to what, what are we progressing to? I find the unwavering arrogance that we know all we need to know worrying. It's like we don't seem to learn from mistakes. Take thalidomide. Introduced in 1953 and considered safe. Birth defects and issues not noted until 8 years later in 1961. But it was safe. One can imagine the dissenting voices being treated as fools in the same way as those who challenge some of the findings. Yes regulations and processes may have been improved since then. But I'm sure at the time they were considered sufficient to launch the product. When there are vast somes of money to be made and political maneuvering people don't always follow "the process" What I read above is "we're doing better, which is an ongoing process". If you see that as arrogance, I'm not sure you understand the process. Everyone is just doing their best and trying to make the best decisions. What's "their best" continues to improve. The fact we have to reach back before my parents were born to find such a disaster actually speaks to the improvements that have been made since then. But who knows. Maybe in 100 years we'll find out that mobile phones turn us all blue. Best stop using them, lest we be considered arrogant for trusting current safety protocols. We've been using mobiles for 30 odd years. It's a silly comparison. " The first human trial of mRNA vaccines was 2001. Why is it silly? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thalidomide. I'm getting on towards 40. It happened before my parents were born. Billions of doses of medicine are administered in the world every day. Billions! I myself have probably taken over ten thousand doses of medication in my lifetime, and I'm but one person. (I have a condition which has required daily medication for most of my life) And the clear and present danger of medicine is so obvious, so clear, so evident in everything we do, that the example that everyone trots out happened before my parents were born. In my family, three generations ago. Clearly, it's super dangerous. All the time. Every day. Hell, I should be dead five times by now " Seriously? One individual has taken lots of medication so therefore we should assume all medication is safe because they aren't yet dead? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thalidomide. I'm getting on towards 40. It happened before my parents were born. Billions of doses of medicine are administered in the world every day. Billions! I myself have probably taken over ten thousand doses of medication in my lifetime, and I'm but one person. (I have a condition which has required daily medication for most of my life) And the clear and present danger of medicine is so obvious, so clear, so evident in everything we do, that the example that everyone trots out happened before my parents were born. In my family, three generations ago. Clearly, it's super dangerous. All the time. Every day. Hell, I should be dead five times by now Seriously? One individual has taken lots of medication so therefore we should assume all medication is safe because they aren't yet dead? " No, in order to say medicine might be dangerous, you have to go back generations. If it were arrogant to assume general safety, people wouldn't have to go that far back in history. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Definitely not. No one will know for sure what a vaccine based on mRNA will do to your body. It may affect any offspring that people have as it affects their DNA. Look at Thalidomide as an example of a medication that affected babies when the mothers took it for morning sickness. While diseases such as cancer is awful, we cannot try and cure everything. Some diseases attract more funding than others and there becomes an inequality on what should be ‘cured’. Why should some diseases take precedence over another? " It's a pity that you overlooked facts about the MRNA vaccines. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shall we count down to end of thread? 19....." Amazing threads for topping up the block list though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread has an amazing number of posts that contain both Dunning Kruger and Tuteur Corollary. Winston" Have you been watching the Bake Off again? G | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread has an amazing number of posts that contain both Dunning Kruger and Tuteur Corollary. Winston" Shit to flies | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread has an amazing number of posts that contain both Dunning Kruger and Tuteur Corollary. Winston Shit to flies " Winston | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it was worth it early on when the strains were more harmful. Now, I reckon the chance of an adverse effect is higher considering risk-benefit, but this depends on your age. We don’t know at all what might happen in 10 years time etc: a good example is during the swine flu (i think it was this epidemic? Noughties anyway) one of the vaccines eventually went on to cause narcolepsy. Whereas if you’re not old and not very unhealthy, covid rn is reliably fine" Strange that so many people who were not old/unhealthy died from Covid or got long Covid then, isn't it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it was worth it early on when the strains were more harmful. Now, I reckon the chance of an adverse effect is higher considering risk-benefit, but this depends on your age. We don’t know at all what might happen in 10 years time etc: a good example is during the swine flu (i think it was this epidemic? Noughties anyway) one of the vaccines eventually went on to cause narcolepsy. Whereas if you’re not old and not very unhealthy, covid rn is reliably fine Strange that so many people who were not old/unhealthy died from Covid or got long Covid then, isn't it?" Early on. If you’re say 60, you’ll be fine from getting omicron today in all likelihood. You don’t know what the adverse effects might be down the line with the vaccine. You “pay” for the certainty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it was worth it early on when the strains were more harmful. Now, I reckon the chance of an adverse effect is higher considering risk-benefit, but this depends on your age. We don’t know at all what might happen in 10 years time etc: a good example is during the swine flu (i think it was this epidemic? Noughties anyway) one of the vaccines eventually went on to cause narcolepsy. Whereas if you’re not old and not very unhealthy, covid rn is reliably fine Strange that so many people who were not old/unhealthy died from Covid or got long Covid then, isn't it? Early on. If you’re say 60, you’ll be fine from getting omicron today in all likelihood. You don’t know what the adverse effects might be down the line with the vaccine. You “pay” for the certainty. " You don't know what the adverse effects of getting Covid may be. That's rather the point of getting vaccinated. But I know you won't listen. Misleading social media seems to have gotten its hooks too deeply into you by now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it was worth it early on when the strains were more harmful. Now, I reckon the chance of an adverse effect is higher considering risk-benefit, but this depends on your age. We don’t know at all what might happen in 10 years time etc: a good example is during the swine flu (i think it was this epidemic? Noughties anyway) one of the vaccines eventually went on to cause narcolepsy. Whereas if you’re not old and not very unhealthy, covid rn is reliably fine Strange that so many people who were not old/unhealthy died from Covid or got long Covid then, isn't it? Early on. If you’re say 60, you’ll be fine from getting omicron today in all likelihood. You don’t know what the adverse effects might be down the line with the vaccine. You “pay” for the certainty. You don't know what the adverse effects of getting Covid may be. That's rather the point of getting vaccinated. But I know you won't listen. Misleading social media seems to have gotten its hooks too deeply into you by now. " What are you talking about. We know the adverse effects of covid very well because the entire population has had it, we know the odds of things etc. We absolutely do not know what might happen with the vaccine later down the line. Don’t be a muppet and Google “Pandemrix”, I’m not anti-vaxx but you’re being as brainless as those who flock towards the “vaccines are evil” crowd. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |