To be fair! there was a study in 2020, they looked at 56 encephalitis patients over 25 years and found evidence of this virus in seven of them.
The virus (named the Borna Virus) was first identified in the 19th century.
Cal |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *mp411Man
over a year ago
chester |
"Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime
This one was discovered in Germany in the 19th century... that's more than 120 years ago."
Cases in China what part of that did you not understand? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime
This one was discovered in Germany in the 19th century... that's more than 120 years ago.
Cases in China what part of that did you not understand? "
The bit where it was a new virus... despite being around for over a century. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime
This one was discovered in Germany in the 19th century... that's more than 120 years ago.
Cases in China what part of that did you not understand?
The bit where it was a new virus... despite being around for over a century."
It's an absolute delight reading your posts Cal.
Scalpel like precision. 
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mp411Man
over a year ago
chester |
"Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime
This one was discovered in Germany in the 19th century... that's more than 120 years ago.
Cases in China what part of that did you not understand?
The bit where it was a new virus... despite being around for over a century."
Funny... the op said cases in china and yes it's not a new virus but neither is coronavirus 1965 I believe? But new cases have been found in china |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime
This one was discovered in Germany in the 19th century... that's more than 120 years ago.
Cases in China what part of that did you not understand?
The bit where it was a new virus... despite being around for over a century.
Funny... the op said cases in china and yes it's not a new virus but neither is coronavirus 1965 I believe? But new cases have been found in china"
To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\ /' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now. 
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime
This one was discovered in Germany in the 19th century... that's more than 120 years ago.
Cases in China what part of that did you not understand?
The bit where it was a new virus... despite being around for over a century.
Funny... the op said cases in china and yes it's not a new virus but neither is coronavirus 1965 I believe? But new cases have been found in china
To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston "
•
Winston, I just perused the headline in my usual flimflam fashion and assumed it originated from Shrewsbury. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston "
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ohn KanakaMan
over a year ago
Not all that North of North London |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP. "
I think the "wihan must be working overtime" definitely alludes to a lan though doesn't it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him "
Ooh handbags out at dawn lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Apparently it has a 75% kill rate.. Here we go again!
Got a link to that claim? "
I read this "claim" earlier. The thing is, it's not exactly true. The virus belongs to a family of viruses that have up to 75% fatality. This one is just mild symptoms... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP. "
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up. 
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him "
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
"
In football parlance, play the ball not the man. 
If I made untrue claims about the origin of a virus I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about how the mRNA vaccines affected the liver I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about my academic qualifications I'd expect to be challenged.
But that's just me.
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Ooh handbags out at dawn lol"
Winston would clearly win….that’s the real reason he won’t engage with him |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
In football parlance, play the ball not the man.
If I made untrue claims about the origin of a virus I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about how the mRNA vaccines affected the liver I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about my academic qualifications I'd expect to be challenged.
But that's just me.
Winston "
Instead of kicking to touch when the board is red, give the ball to their winger to run in unnoposed then kick anyone to deflect.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'll give those pesky shrews a wide berth from now on.
Err... any idea what they look like, can only see hedgehogs and squirrels in the garden.
Will I be attacked by one on the walk home from the pub, a Ninja variety shrew, oh dear, all confused now.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
In football parlance, play the ball not the man.
If I made untrue claims about the origin of a virus I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about how the mRNA vaccines affected the liver I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about my academic qualifications I'd expect to be challenged.
But that's just me.
Winston
Instead of kicking to touch when the board is red, give the ball to their winger to run in unnoposed then kick anyone to deflect.. "
The ball's coming into the box, it's there to be played.......
But I'll ignore it, sink my teeth into a defenders shoulder and hope no-one sees.
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston "
You are the one who mentioned the actual lab, he didnt mention it. Thats the point the last comment was making |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
You are the one who mentioned the actual lab, he didnt mention it. Thats the point the last comment was making"
Read up. I did not mention the Wuhan lab. The riginal post is still there in black and white.
Feel free to pop back and apologise when you've read it.
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
You are the one who mentioned the actual lab, he didnt mention it. Thats the point the last comment was making
Read up. I did not mention the Wuhan lab. The riginal post is still there in black and white.
Feel free to pop back and apologise when you've read it.
Winston "
Can you point it out to me? Because the first mention of a lab i see in this thread came from you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
You are the one who mentioned the actual lab, he didnt mention it. Thats the point the last comment was making
Read up. I did not mention the Wuhan lab. The riginal post is still there in black and white.
Feel free to pop back and apologise when you've read it.
Winston
Can you point it out to me? Because the first mention of a lab i see in this thread came from you "
6th post down.
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
You are the one who mentioned the actual lab, he didnt mention it. Thats the point the last comment was making
Read up. I did not mention the Wuhan lab. The riginal post is still there in black and white.
Feel free to pop back and apologise when you've read it.
Winston
Can you point it out to me? Because the first mention of a lab i see in this thread came from you
6th post down.
Winston"
Im not seeing any mention of a lab in there, which was exactly what i said to you initially. You are the one who added in the word 'lab' |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
You are the one who mentioned the actual lab, he didnt mention it. Thats the point the last comment was making
Read up. I did not mention the Wuhan lab. The riginal post is still there in black and white.
Feel free to pop back and apologise when you've read it.
Winston
Can you point it out to me? Because the first mention of a lab i see in this thread came from you
6th post down.
Winston
Im not seeing any mention of a lab in there, which was exactly what i said to you initially. You are the one who added in the word 'lab'"
I guess apologies only go one way then |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
You are the one who mentioned the actual lab, he didnt mention it. Thats the point the last comment was making
Read up. I did not mention the Wuhan lab. The riginal post is still there in black and white.
Feel free to pop back and apologise when you've read it.
Winston
Can you point it out to me? Because the first mention of a lab i see in this thread came from you
6th post down.
Winston
Im not seeing any mention of a lab in there, which was exactly what i said to you initially. You are the one who added in the word 'lab'
I guess apologies only go one way then "
I think we're all caught up now |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
In football parlance, play the ball not the man.
If I made untrue claims about the origin of a virus I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about how the mRNA vaccines affected the liver I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about my academic qualifications I'd expect to be challenged.
But that's just me.
Winston
Instead of kicking to touch when the board is red, give the ball to their winger to run in unnoposed then kick anyone to deflect..
The ball's coming into the box, it's there to be played.......
But I'll ignore it, sink my teeth into a defenders shoulder and hope no-one sees.
Winston "
Ouch..
Although apart from that he was good |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
You are the one who mentioned the actual lab, he didnt mention it. Thats the point the last comment was making
Read up. I did not mention the Wuhan lab. The riginal post is still there in black and white.
Feel free to pop back and apologise when you've read it.
Winston
Can you point it out to me? Because the first mention of a lab i see in this thread came from you
6th post down.
Winston
Im not seeing any mention of a lab in there, which was exactly what i said to you initially. You are the one who added in the word 'lab'"
Good point, well spotted. I'll take the hit.
I guess he could have meant Wuhan football club. He did leave it a bit vague.
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
In football parlance, play the ball not the man.
If I made untrue claims about the origin of a virus I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about how the mRNA vaccines affected the liver I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about my academic qualifications I'd expect to be challenged.
But that's just me.
Winston
Instead of kicking to touch when the board is red, give the ball to their winger to run in unnoposed then kick anyone to deflect..
The ball's coming into the box, it's there to be played.......
But I'll ignore it, sink my teeth into a defenders shoulder and hope no-one sees.
Winston
Ouch..
Although apart from that he was good "
My boys could do with a striker with his ability. 
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yep! That's the latest! Cases in China where a virus is passed on by Shrews.
Can’t be too difficult to tame that. "
That made us lol. You do realise that a Taming Of The Shrew reference would be lost on here! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
In football parlance, play the ball not the man.
If I made untrue claims about the origin of a virus I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about how the mRNA vaccines affected the liver I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about my academic qualifications I'd expect to be challenged.
But that's just me.
Winston
Instead of kicking to touch when the board is red, give the ball to their winger to run in unnoposed then kick anyone to deflect..
The ball's coming into the box, it's there to be played.......
But I'll ignore it, sink my teeth into a defenders shoulder and hope no-one sees.
Winston
Ouch..
Although apart from that he was good
My boys could do with a striker with his ability.
Winston "
Ronnie wants a move.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
In football parlance, play the ball not the man.
If I made untrue claims about the origin of a virus I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about how the mRNA vaccines affected the liver I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about my academic qualifications I'd expect to be challenged.
But that's just me.
Winston
Instead of kicking to touch when the board is red, give the ball to their winger to run in unnoposed then kick anyone to deflect..
The ball's coming into the box, it's there to be played.......
But I'll ignore it, sink my teeth into a defenders shoulder and hope no-one sees.
Winston
Ouch..
Although apart from that he was good
My boys could do with a striker with his ability.
Winston
Ronnie wants a move.."
We're daft enough to buy him.
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
In football parlance, play the ball not the man.
If I made untrue claims about the origin of a virus I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about how the mRNA vaccines affected the liver I'd expect to be challenged.
If I made untrue claims about my academic qualifications I'd expect to be challenged.
But that's just me.
Winston
Instead of kicking to touch when the board is red, give the ball to their winger to run in unnoposed then kick anyone to deflect..
The ball's coming into the box, it's there to be played.......
But I'll ignore it, sink my teeth into a defenders shoulder and hope no-one sees.
Winston
Ouch..
Although apart from that he was good
My boys could do with a striker with his ability.
Winston
Ronnie wants a move..
We're daft enough to buy him.
Winston "
Please do..
Actually no, hope he stays put ..  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *lynJMan
over a year ago
Morden |
"Yep! That's the latest! Cases in China where a virus is passed on by Shrews.
Can’t be too difficult to tame that.
That made us lol. You do realise that a Taming Of The Shrew reference would be lost on here! "
I got the reference. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Ok it's a virus. You all for immigration without vetting potential people to citizenship? If it's the next coronavirus do you take the chance? Infecting everyone again? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mp411Man
over a year ago
chester |
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
"
Funny... the op said cases in china and yes it's not a new virus but neither is coronavirus 1965 I believe? But new cases have been found in china
How is that "not accepting" cals statement? I'm agreeing it's not a new virus so there's irony mate |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
Funny... the op said cases in china and yes it's not a new virus but neither is coronavirus 1965 I believe? But new cases have been found in china
How is that "not accepting" cals statement? I'm agreeing it's not a new virus so there's irony mate"
There are many coronaviruses, including those we have as the common cold. Perhaps you could be more specific about the one identified in 1965, referencing credible scientific literature? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston "
Yes it does say Wuhan quite clearly, doesn’t say Wuhan LAB which was my point. It was YOU who said Wuhan lab.
Enjoy your weekend |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
Yes it does say Wuhan quite clearly, doesn’t say Wuhan LAB which was my point. It was YOU who said Wuhan lab.
Enjoy your weekend "
What do you think he ment by saying Wuhan if not meaning the lab? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
Yes it does say Wuhan quite clearly, doesn’t say Wuhan LAB which was my point. It was YOU who said Wuhan lab.
Enjoy your weekend "
Keep up, Winston dealt with this comment a week ago. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
Yes it does say Wuhan quite clearly, doesn’t say Wuhan LAB which was my point. It was YOU who said Wuhan lab.
Enjoy your weekend
What do you think he ment by saying Wuhan if not meaning the lab?"
Don't know but at a guess if he'd have wanted to say lab he'd have written lab? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Winston would argue with himself if he wasn't such a narssist with an ego the size of saturn that's why I won't engage with him
Mate you need to look up the meaning of the word irony..
Instead of accepting the facts Cal told you, you've chosen to attack someone else's ego..
Funny... the op said cases in china and yes it's not a new virus but neither is coronavirus 1965 I believe? But new cases have been found in china
How is that "not accepting" cals statement? I'm agreeing it's not a new virus so there's irony mate
There are many coronaviruses, including those we have as the common cold. Perhaps you could be more specific about the one identified in 1965, referencing credible scientific literature? "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
Yes it does say Wuhan quite clearly, doesn’t say Wuhan LAB which was my point. It was YOU who said Wuhan lab.
Enjoy your weekend
What do you think he ment by saying Wuhan if not meaning the lab?
Don't know but at a guess if he'd have wanted to say lab he'd have written lab? "
It couldn't be clearer really. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By * Plus ECouple
over a year ago
The South |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
Yes it does say Wuhan quite clearly, doesn’t say Wuhan LAB which was my point. It was YOU who said Wuhan lab.
Enjoy your weekend
What do you think he ment by saying Wuhan if not meaning the lab?"
All the people coming back to a thread to have a dig at someone who left the thread more than a week ago.
I imagine he lives rent free in their heads. Lol
Ells |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irldnCouple
over a year ago
Brighton |
First time reading this thread. I will never get those 5 mins back but it was at least a bit amusing.
Reading the thread with the benefit of hindsight it is like watching a bunch of cross-eyed people trying to argue face-to-face!
Aren’t we all an easily triggered lot!
And yeah, been there myself on other threads. We should all take a few chill pills (me too).
Weirdly The Taming of the Shrew was on TV the other day with Burton & Taylor. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
Yes it does say Wuhan quite clearly, doesn’t say Wuhan LAB which was my point. It was YOU who said Wuhan lab.
Enjoy your weekend
What do you think he ment by saying Wuhan if not meaning the lab?
All the people coming back to a thread to have a dig at someone who left the thread more than a week ago.
I imagine he lives rent free in their heads. Lol
Ells"
Oh the irony. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" To clarify for you....
The OP said "cases in china"
You said "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Cal pointed out "that it's not a new virus" and gave detail of its history.
I'm saying "you twisted the OP to make some sort of conspiracy point '\/' and Cal corrected your incorrect claim that it's a new virus from the Wuhan lab"
I think we're all caught up now.
Winston
He also never said “Wuhan lab” so you have clearly just done to him what you accused him of doing to the OP.
Er, "Why are all these new viruses coming from China? Wuhan must be working overtime"
Says Wuhan quite clearly. The post is still there. Read up.
Winston
Yes it does say Wuhan quite clearly, doesn’t say Wuhan LAB which was my point. It was YOU who said Wuhan lab.
Enjoy your weekend
What do you think he ment by saying Wuhan if not meaning the lab?
All the people coming back to a thread to have a dig at someone who left the thread more than a week ago.
I imagine he lives rent free in their heads. Lol
Ells
Oh the irony. "
Oh boys, boys.
You must try to get out more, bit of fresh air will blow all your fears away.
Have fun and stay away from a keyboard for a few hours. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *exfordMan
over a year ago
discombobulated land |
"Yep! That's the latest! Cases in China where a virus is passed on by Shrews. "
I was on the bus yesterday and an old lady had it. I know for definite because she kept flicking her head forward violently, reading her hand to her nose and shouting 'Ahh..shrew!!' |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
