Found an interesting article here explaining a bit more about how they discovered boosters were needed.
Also interested to see this... About basic assumptions that were made that now have doubts cast..
"Peter English, a retired consultant in communicable disease control, said the prevailing assumption so far had been that protection against serious illness and more severe outcomes, for example by T-cells, would persist, “perhaps for many years”.
“This paper casts doubt on these assumptions,” said English. “It documents a gradual decrease in prevention against severe disease over time, with severe disease becoming about five times more likely, compared to shortly after vaccination, after just a few months.”
Here's the full article..
https://www.ft.com/content/1d7371c2-c248-4833-b9c9-2f91f48a4725 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
