I would say close to 100%. It would be crazy to think anyone could have avoiding such a claimed transmissible air born virus circulating for over 2 years.
It's unfortunate these figures related to test results will never give a true picture of things as they don't include the multitude of times someone has got this and just got on with things and shrugged it of as a cold and let the old trusty immune system deal with it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If we go by the official figures, about 16%. In reality probably more like 30-35% do you not trust the government numbers now ?  "
I'm factoring in asymptomatic cases and people not bothering to test. I absolutely accept that there have been 11 million positive tests. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If we go by the official figures, about 16%. In reality probably more like 30-35%
do you not trust the government numbers now ? "
He probably appreciates there's a lag between cases proved positive and the numbers appearing on the stats.
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If we go by the official figures, about 16%. In reality probably more like 30-35%
do you not trust the government numbers now ?
He probably appreciates there's a lag between cases proved positive and the numbers appearing on the stats.
Winston"
Actually, that lag isn't as bad as you'd imagine, generally the positive tests counted are added in the correct 24 hour period. The real lag comes between infection and test. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
