FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > molnupiravir

molnupiravir

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *I Two OP   Couple  over a year ago

PDI 12-26th Nov 24

The magic bullet ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

No. Monotherapy will accelerate mutation.

Helpful, certainly.

I suspect a silver bullet will look something like a vaccine inducing mucosal immunity, in combination with lowered circulation of the virus (and therefore slowing mutation right down).

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" in combination with lowered circulation of the virus (and therefore slowing mutation right down)."

A little late for that maybe?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

A multi-pronged approach is probably needed that will target different aspects of prevention, treatments etc, in very different countries, with varying infrastructures around the world. It's fantastic that we have found some really effective tools to help us, including this one

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


" in combination with lowered circulation of the virus (and therefore slowing mutation right down).

A little late for that maybe?"

No. The more it circulates the better it has a chance to do. No matter how little or much it spreads. So (numbers for illustration) a virus that's circulated a million times has had less chance to evolve against our immune system than a virus that's circulated a trillion times.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

EIDD-2801, AKA Molnupiravir, similar drugs in the same class have been shown to produce birth defects [in animals].

It is of use only in the early stage of sars-cov-2 infection. If the covid disease has progressed, it is of no use.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"EIDD-2801, AKA Molnupiravir, similar drugs in the same class have been shown to produce birth defects [in animals].

It is of use only in the early stage of sars-cov-2 infection. If the covid disease has progressed, it is of no use."

Yes, that's the other issue - severe disease is no longer in the viral phase

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" in combination with lowered circulation of the virus (and therefore slowing mutation right down).

A little late for that maybe?

No. The more it circulates the better it has a chance to do. No matter how little or much it spreads. So (numbers for illustration) a virus that's circulated a million times has had less chance to evolve against our immune system than a virus that's circulated a trillion times."

I get that.

My point was that it's a little late to stop covid spreading worldwide. That horse bolted a couple of years ago.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


" in combination with lowered circulation of the virus (and therefore slowing mutation right down).

A little late for that maybe?

No. The more it circulates the better it has a chance to do. No matter how little or much it spreads. So (numbers for illustration) a virus that's circulated a million times has had less chance to evolve against our immune system than a virus that's circulated a trillion times.

I get that.

My point was that it's a little late to stop covid spreading worldwide. That horse bolted a couple of years ago."

I get that too, but the more we slow it down, the more chance we have of keeping up therapeutically. It's not a yes/no question - it's a "how hard do you want this to be" question.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Not hard enough to ensure the rest of the world has equal access to vaccines.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Not hard enough to ensure the rest of the world has equal access to vaccines."

Depends.

On whether the PTB want to rest of the world to be vaccinated.

Or prefer depopulation.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Not hard enough to ensure the rest of the world has equal access to vaccines."

Yeah... Omicron seems to be a lesson no one wants to look at closely, there.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Not hard enough to ensure the rest of the world has equal access to vaccines.

Yeah... Omicron seems to be a lesson no one wants to look at closely, there."

Though ironically some believe it may have resulted in a lessening of the disease. If that proves to be true it may be that nature will be the source of the solution more so than science.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Not hard enough to ensure the rest of the world has equal access to vaccines.

Yeah... Omicron seems to be a lesson no one wants to look at closely, there.

Though ironically some believe it may have resulted in a lessening of the disease. If that proves to be true it may be that nature will be the source of the solution more so than science."

I'll believe it when I see it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Not hard enough to ensure the rest of the world has equal access to vaccines.

Yeah... Omicron seems to be a lesson no one wants to look at closely, there.

Though ironically some believe it may have resulted in a lessening of the disease. If that proves to be true it may be that nature will be the source of the solution more so than science.

I'll believe it when I see it."

Me too. I guess we'll know soon enough...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ob198XaMan  over a year ago

teleford


"Not hard enough to ensure the rest of the world has equal access to vaccines.

Yeah... Omicron seems to be a lesson no one wants to look at closely, there.

Though ironically some believe it may have resulted in a lessening of the disease. If that proves to be true it may be that nature will be the source of the solution more so than science.

I'll believe it when I see it.

Me too. I guess we'll know soon enough..."

No, not soon enough, hence the current push for masks, working from home and boosters...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Not hard enough to ensure the rest of the world has equal access to vaccines.

Yeah... Omicron seems to be a lesson no one wants to look at closely, there.

Though ironically some believe it may have resulted in a lessening of the disease. If that proves to be true it may be that nature will be the source of the solution more so than science.

I'll believe it when I see it.

Me too. I guess we'll know soon enough...

No, not soon enough, hence the current push for masks, working from home and boosters..."

I can't see how any of that's going to achieve much.

Unless immunity kicks in from the boosters at an unusually rapid rate the boosters will be too late to have much of an impact for people getting together for Christmas parties and gatherings.

As for behavioural changes... I'm not seeing much evidence of that.

If there had been a genuine desire to slow prevalence it would have taken another lockdown.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0