"Which i believe is correct. It’s only if contacted by Track and Trace that you legally have to isolate (before 16 Aug)"
I think this has always been the case.
The sooner they sort out appropriate financial support for those who do need to isolate, the easier it will be to get on top of exponential growth in infection levels |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Which i believe is correct. It’s only if contacted by Track and Trace that you legally have to isolate (before 16 Aug)
I think this has always been the case.
The sooner they sort out appropriate financial support for those who do need to isolate, the easier it will be to get on top of exponential growth in infection levels "
  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
He has been slapped down by no.10
If you are pinged you are advised to self isolate, whilst it is advisory, business should be supporting employees to isolate and not be encouraging them to break isolation…
If you are actually contacted by a track and trace advisor then it is a legal requirement that you self isolate |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Which i believe is correct. It’s only if contacted by Track and Trace that you legally have to isolate (before 16 Aug)
I think this has always been the case.
The sooner they sort out appropriate financial support for those who do need to isolate, the easier it will be to get on top of exponential growth in infection levels "
A bit too late for that now. It should have been done when there were only a comparitive handful of cases, but of course it was too expensive then. Fast forward to when there is over 50,000 new cases every day, and now it really is too expensive. Unfortunately the consequences of not doing it are even more expensive.
The entire history of the virus spread in the UK can be summarised as: We can't possibly afford £10 million to do that! With the bill instead reaching £10 billion a couple of months later, £100 billion shortly thereafter, and now measured in trillions and still not finished. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Paul Scully business minister interviewed this morning confirms if pinged there is no legal requirement to isolate. "
Didnt we get told this last week? Alongside a message saying.. "but we are sure people wlll do what's right"... Everybody clear!? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Which i believe is correct. It’s only if contacted by Track and Trace that you legally have to isolate (before 16 Aug)
I think this has always been the case.
The sooner they sort out appropriate financial support for those who do need to isolate, the easier it will be to get on top of exponential growth in infection levels
A bit too late for that now. It should have been done when there were only a comparitive handful of cases, but of course it was too expensive then. Fast forward to when there is over 50,000 new cases every day, and now it really is too expensive. Unfortunately the consequences of not doing it are even more expensive.
The entire history of the virus spread in the UK can be summarised as: We can't possibly afford £10 million to do that! With the bill instead reaching £10 billion a couple of months later, £100 billion shortly thereafter, and now measured in trillions and still not finished. "
I'm stunned that a Conservative government tried to get away with doing nothing for the many... but only it started to affect the bottom line of the privileged few. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
