FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Hancock the scapegoat.
Hancock the scapegoat.
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *ubal1 OP Man
over a year ago
Newry Down |
Hancock will now become an individual scapegoat for what has been a collective failure, in some respects.
His successor will have a much easier time, as we emerge from the crisis.
He should have been sacked long ago; he was way out of his depth.
Boris will be rubbing his hands in delight! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Hancock will now become an individual scapegoat for what has been a collective failure, in some respects.
His successor will have a much easier time, as we emerge from the crisis.
He should have been sacked long ago; he was way out of his depth.
Boris will be rubbing his hands in delight!"
Unlike Hancock who will be rubbing his former aides arse x
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hancock will now become an individual scapegoat for what has been a collective failure, in some respects.
His successor will have a much easier time, as we emerge from the crisis.
He should have been sacked long ago; he was way out of his depth.
Boris will be rubbing his hands in delight!
Unlike Hancock who will be rubbing his former aides arse x
"
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Hancock will now become an individual scapegoat for what has been a collective failure, in some respects.
His successor will have a much easier time, as we emerge from the crisis.
He should have been sacked long ago; he was way out of his depth.
Boris will be rubbing his hands in delight!
Unlike Hancock who will be rubbing his former aides arse x
"
He was always going to be the scapegoat, regardless of his groping ways
He's too think for any one outcome. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Hancock will now become an individual scapegoat for what has been a collective failure, in some respects.
His successor will have a much easier time, as we emerge from the crisis.
He should have been sacked long ago; he was way out of his depth.
Boris will be rubbing his hands in delight!
Unlike Hancock who will be rubbing his former aides arse x
He was always going to be the scapegoat, regardless of his groping ways
He's too think for any one outcome."
He will be quite rightly be a Scapegoat because he is a slimey corrupt little fekwit and deserves every bad news that comes his way |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *jhj69Couple
over a year ago
sale |
"Hancock will now become an individual scapegoat for what has been a collective failure, in some respects.
His successor will have a much easier time, as we emerge from the crisis.
He should have been sacked long ago; he was way out of his depth.
Boris will be rubbing his hands in delight!
Unlike Hancock who will be rubbing his former aides arse x
He was always going to be the scapegoat, regardless of his groping ways
He's too think for any one outcome.
He will be quite rightly be a Scapegoat because he is a slimey corrupt little fekwit and deserves every bad news that comes his way "
You could potentially remove the name Hancock and replace it with almost every other minister. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hancock will now become an individual scapegoat for what has been a collective failure, in some respects.
His successor will have a much easier time, as we emerge from the crisis.
He should have been sacked long ago; he was way out of his depth.
Boris will be rubbing his hands in delight!
Unlike Hancock who will be rubbing his former aides arse x
He was always going to be the scapegoat, regardless of his groping ways
He's too think for any one outcome.
He will be quite rightly be a Scapegoat because he is a slimey corrupt little fekwit and deserves every bad news that comes his way
You could potentially remove the name Hancock and replace it with almost every other minister. "
Do you think that they all might have been shagging her then? Wonder if there is a dungeon room in the basement of Westminster? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hancock will now become an individual scapegoat for what has been a collective failure, in some respects.
His successor will have a much easier time, as we emerge from the crisis.
He should have been sacked long ago; he was way out of his depth.
Boris will be rubbing his hands in delight!
Unlike Hancock who will be rubbing his former aides arse x
He was always going to be the scapegoat, regardless of his groping ways
He's too think for any one outcome.
He will be quite rightly be a Scapegoat because he is a slimey corrupt little fekwit and deserves every bad news that comes his way
You could potentially remove the name Hancock and replace it with almost every other minister.
Do you think that they all might have been shagging her then? Wonder if there is a dungeon room in the basement of Westminster?"
Don't know about the dungeon but they do have a cafe that done a nice salmon sandwich for about 50p when I hast delivered up there and beer was damn cheap aswell lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
None of us really know what went on.. I suspect Hancock was a bit of a balance to bjs no more lockdowns / bodies piled high approach... sj and bj are more aligned regarding lock downs and treating it like a cold.... So there won't be the balance in those discussions... Its going to be hold on to your face masks as we race to the crest of the 3rd wave with sj and bj driving the covid gravy train. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irldnCouple
over a year ago
Brighton |
What we do know is the companies of both the brother and the father of his FWB have received substantial (£millions) contracts from Hancock’s Department. But of course that is purely an amazing coincidence! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eaky00Man
over a year ago
Swaffham |
Unlike Hancock his replacement at least seems a man of integrity who resigned upon a matter of principle when he came up against Gollum in his former roll a couple of years ago
He’s also much more pro getting restrictions lifted than Hancock thats for sure which is also a good sign . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
SJ is a banker (est salary £1M/yr before becoming a MP) with no healthcare background - other than being an adviser to JP Morgan, who want to privatise healthcare in the UK.
We’ll see what the new Health Bill says when it’s published in the next few weeks: it may well suggest further / complete privatisation.
DoI: I think this would be a dangerous idea
DoI 2: if we go to fully private work, my salary would go up by three-fivefold |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago
East London |
"Hancock will now become an individual scapegoat for what has been a collective failure, in some respects.
His successor will have a much easier time, as we emerge from the crisis.
He should have been sacked long ago; he was way out of his depth.
Boris will be rubbing his hands in delight!
Unlike Hancock who will be rubbing his former aides arse x
He was always going to be the scapegoat, regardless of his groping ways
He's too think for any one outcome.
He will be quite rightly be a Scapegoat because he is a slimey corrupt little fekwit and deserves every bad news that comes his way
You could potentially remove the name Hancock and replace it with almost every other minister.
Do you think that they all might have been shagging her then? Wonder if there is a dungeon room in the basement of Westminster?
Don't know about the dungeon but they do have a cafe that done a nice salmon sandwich for about 50p when I hast delivered up there and beer was damn cheap aswell lol "
Back in the 80s? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"He only did what most of us would have done thinking could get away with it, players got to play"
Well most of us wouldnt have let 100,000s people die needlessly but good for you for being so open
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'd imagine Bozo's main reason for not sacking him is that Hancock's got loads of dirt on Boris that happened before and after Cummings left. After all, he could have sacked him for just being "totally fucking hopeless" but chose not to- Hancock knew better than anyone what kind of shitstorm was being creates and who was responsible (or irresposible) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd imagine Bozo's main reason for not sacking him is that Hancock's got loads of dirt on Boris that happened before and after Cummings left. After all, he could have sacked him for just being "totally fucking hopeless" but chose not to- Hancock knew better than anyone what kind of shitstorm was being creates and who was responsible (or irresposible)"
So why has he gone now then? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm sure in time he will sell his side of things to a newspaper.
They always do"
Why would anyone want to hear his side of the story. We already know he is a total cunt so I don't think anyone would be that interested in his pathetic excuses. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Hope he didn’t Put his trust in the ppe that was supplied by his mates!!!!
No doubt he’ll appear on some celebrity bullshit program
Hancocks half hour!!!
Lights camera action!!!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd imagine Bozo's main reason for not sacking him is that Hancock's got loads of dirt on Boris that happened before and after Cummings left. After all, he could have sacked him for just being "totally fucking hopeless" but chose not to- Hancock knew better than anyone what kind of shitstorm was being creates and who was responsible (or irresposible)
So why has he gone now then?"
Because his position is untenable. Its not about the affair,but about the hypocrisy. Tory MPs were reporting to the whips that their constituency parties were unhappy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm sure in time he will sell his side of things to a newspaper.
They always do
Why would anyone want to hear his side of the story. We already know he is a total cunt so I don't think anyone would be that interested in his pathetic excuses."
Every single time he appeared on TV or in the Commons, Hancock looked like he was trying to invent the story as he went along. Probably because he was!
Exactly the same look as the kids I used to teach who'd been caught doing things wrong. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *adMerWoman
over a year ago
Sandwich |
Someone was always going to be a scapegoat. He was the perfect patsy.
The leak of security camera footage that would ordinarily have been suppressed is telling.
He interacted with one other person for his sexual gratification. If that’s his worst crime, it’s not that high on my list of crimes.
Cummmings made far worse decisions that weren’t even led by his penis! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Someone was always going to be a scapegoat. He was the perfect patsy.
The leak of security camera footage that would ordinarily have been suppressed is telling.
He interacted with one other person for his sexual gratification. If that’s his worst crime, it’s not that high on my list of crimes.
Cummmings made far worse decisions that weren’t even led by his penis!"
You are delusional, at best. If you think having an affair was his crime you should really get out more. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
