FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > I’m still So Puzzled

I’m still So Puzzled

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *aralewis OP   Couple  over a year ago

South Yorkshire

We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *alandNitaCouple  over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

"

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ost SockMan  over a year ago

West Wales and Cardiff

Vaccines don’t make you immune to Covid, you can still get it, it’s just you are likely to be less affected by it. I work on the frontline of this, and have seen people test positive after having both jabs.

It’s mainly younger people who we are seeing, so it really is a race to get people vaccinate before the current variants circulate in society and mutate further, possibly into forms that aren’t suppressed so well by the vaccines.

If you listen to the scientists in meetings, most are very pleased with the vaccines and feel positive, but state that there’s some chance of a problematic variant emerging.

Personally, I’m feeling pretty positive, but there is definitely more feeling of concern around the last few days.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ungblackbullMan  over a year ago

scotland


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal"

There was a good graph in the Daily Mail yesterday (yes, really!) showing the number of cases of Delta (Indian variant) and the percentage that ended up in A&E, hospitalised or dead and then stated how many were unvaccinated, 1 dose or double dose.

This shows what we already knew. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting unwell, hospitalised or dying. However, the numbers of fully vaccinated people requiring treatment (or dying) were far lower. If you also factor in that the double vaccinated are mainly 60+ and therefore more vulnerable, this really does demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in keeping people out of hospital.

The problem though is that whilst the virus spreads though the younger age groups (particular kids and their parents in the 25 to 44 age), it gets more opportunity to hit the elderly who the vaccine wasn't effective for.

We also need to be aware that the vaccine is less effective against the delta variant so any further mutations may be even more vaccine resistant and therefore potentially make the vaccine programme a waste of time.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *alandNitaCouple  over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal

-----

There was a good graph in the Daily Mail yesterday (yes, really!) showing the number of cases of Delta (Indian variant) and the percentage that ended up in A&E, hospitalised or dead and then stated how many were unvaccinated, 1 dose or double dose.

This shows what we already knew. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting unwell, hospitalised or dying. However, the numbers of fully vaccinated people requiring treatment (or dying) were far lower. If you also factor in that the double vaccinated are mainly 60+ and therefore more vulnerable, this really does demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in keeping people out of hospital.

The problem though is that whilst the virus spreads though the younger age groups (particular kids and their parents in the 25 to 44 age), it gets more opportunity to hit the elderly who the vaccine wasn't effective for.

We also need to be aware that the vaccine is less effective against the delta variant so any further mutations may be even more vaccine resistant and therefore potentially make the vaccine programme a waste of time."

Sorry but your post is a bit contradictory. The number of fully vaccinated people requiring Hospital intervention being "much lower" indicates that the vaccine does stop people getting sick and dying.

The data has shown an above 80% reduction of hospitalizations of those fully vaccinated and a 65% reduction of infection rate for those protected.

Cal

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *imes_berksMan  over a year ago

Bracknell


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal

There was a good graph in the Daily Mail yesterday (yes, really!) showing the number of cases of Delta (Indian variant) and the percentage that ended up in A&E, hospitalised or dead and then stated how many were unvaccinated, 1 dose or double dose.

This shows what we already knew. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting unwell, hospitalised or dying. However, the numbers of fully vaccinated people requiring treatment (or dying) were far lower. If you also factor in that the double vaccinated are mainly 60+ and therefore more vulnerable, this really does demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in keeping people out of hospital.

The problem though is that whilst the virus spreads though the younger age groups (particular kids and their parents in the 25 to 44 age), it gets more opportunity to hit the elderly who the vaccine wasn't effective for.

We also need to be aware that the vaccine is less effective against the delta variant so any further mutations may be even more vaccine resistant and therefore potentially make the vaccine programme a waste of time."

In reply to your last paragraph, that is why there will be yearly booster jabs that will be effective against new strains and this will probably only be given to the most vulnerable. This is basically the same as for the flu jab each year -it is designed to be effective against the most common predicted strain for that winter season

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ungblackbullMan  over a year ago

scotland


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal

-----

There was a good graph in the Daily Mail yesterday (yes, really!) showing the number of cases of Delta (Indian variant) and the percentage that ended up in A&E, hospitalised or dead and then stated how many were unvaccinated, 1 dose or double dose.

This shows what we already knew. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting unwell, hospitalised or dying. However, the numbers of fully vaccinated people requiring treatment (or dying) were far lower. If you also factor in that the double vaccinated are mainly 60+ and therefore more vulnerable, this really does demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in keeping people out of hospital.

The problem though is that whilst the virus spreads though the younger age groups (particular kids and their parents in the 25 to 44 age), it gets more opportunity to hit the elderly who the vaccine wasn't effective for.

We also need to be aware that the vaccine is less effective against the delta variant so any further mutations may be even more vaccine resistant and therefore potentially make the vaccine programme a waste of time.

Sorry but your post is a bit contradictory. The number of fully vaccinated people requiring Hospital intervention being "much lower" indicates that the vaccine does stop people getting sick and dying.

The data has shown an above 80% reduction of hospitalizations of those fully vaccinated and a 65% reduction of infection rate for those protected.

Cal"

Not contradictory. Just depends what you mean by stop.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *isfits behaving badlyCouple  over a year ago

Coventry

I think the worry is high virus rates massively expands the opportunity for mutation. I think there is a worry of this breading amongst the unvaccinated young could lead to mutations that become more damaging and harmful to young people. Also that the more virus there is in the population the more exposure it has to the vaccinated population and thus more risk of mutation to become resistant to the vacine.

I think the pressure is not so much to continue the restorations long term but to extend a few weeks allowing more of the population to be vaccinated. I understand this argument but don't agree. I think we are at a stage where the total gains of lifting restrictions outweigh the risks. Especially when looking at the wider socio-economic risks of not lifting restorations. Plus what's the point of everyone here staying restricted when the virus is rampant globally and thus those mutations will probably occur elsewhere and spread anyway.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aralewis OP   Couple  over a year ago

South Yorkshire


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal"

The virus isn’t going anywhere even if everyone had the jab

And not everyone believes in science because it’s an opinion

I every country will have a new strain coz as long as people been earth they always been Virus

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aralewis OP   Couple  over a year ago

South Yorkshire


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal

There was a good graph in the Daily Mail yesterday (yes, really!) showing the number of cases of Delta (Indian variant) and the percentage that ended up in A&E, hospitalised or dead and then stated how many were unvaccinated, 1 dose or double dose.

This shows what we already knew. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting unwell, hospitalised or dying. However, the numbers of fully vaccinated people requiring treatment (or dying) were far lower. If you also factor in that the double vaccinated are mainly 60+ and therefore more vulnerable, this really does demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in keeping people out of hospital.

The problem though is that whilst the virus spreads though the younger age groups (particular kids and their parents in the 25 to 44 age), it gets more opportunity to hit the elderly who the vaccine wasn't effective for.

We also need to be aware that the vaccine is less effective against the delta variant so any further mutations may be even more vaccine resistant and therefore potentially make the vaccine programme a waste of time."

So have we eradicated and suppressed the Kent virus

Or is it that uk national was getting banned from entering other country it’s disappeared and the media stopped reporting it

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman  over a year ago

evesham


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

"

Seatbelts stopped many people from dying in car accidents so by your logic we should stop using them as they did their job?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman  over a year ago

evesham


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits "

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *imes_berksMan  over a year ago

Bracknell


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits "

Not lies. You just don’t understand the word assymptomatic

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal

There was a good graph in the Daily Mail yesterday (yes, really!) showing the number of cases of Delta (Indian variant) and the percentage that ended up in A&E, hospitalised or dead and then stated how many were unvaccinated, 1 dose or double dose.

This shows what we already knew. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting unwell, hospitalised or dying. However, the numbers of fully vaccinated people requiring treatment (or dying) were far lower. If you also factor in that the double vaccinated are mainly 60+ and therefore more vulnerable, this really does demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in keeping people out of hospital.

The problem though is that whilst the virus spreads though the younger age groups (particular kids and their parents in the 25 to 44 age), it gets more opportunity to hit the elderly who the vaccine wasn't effective for.

We also need to be aware that the vaccine is less effective against the delta variant so any further mutations may be even more vaccine resistant and therefore potentially make the vaccine programme a waste of time.

So have we eradicated and suppressed the Kent virus

Or is it that uk national was getting banned from entering other country it’s disappeared and the media stopped reporting it"

Now this makes sence Kent virus its all a load of crap , I for one don’t believe a word the government says , and the media lol there just scaremongers.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ackandtheunicornCouple  over a year ago

liverpool

Because it's all a load of bollox. Figures exaggerated so the dictators can maintain control of our lives, whilst enriching their mates with hefty contracts.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine. "

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman  over a year ago

evesham

[Removed by poster at 05/06/21 08:26:37]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman  over a year ago

evesham


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite "

Just because I wasn't ill with it doesn't mean other people weren't or that other people didn't die does it?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *imes_berksMan  over a year ago

Bracknell


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite "

Thank you dory. Just keep trolling, just keep trolling

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits "

STI's can have no symptoms. Doesn't mean they don't exist.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal

-----

There was a good graph in the Daily Mail yesterday (yes, really!) showing the number of cases of Delta (Indian variant) and the percentage that ended up in A&E, hospitalised or dead and then stated how many were unvaccinated, 1 dose or double dose.

This shows what we already knew. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting unwell, hospitalised or dying. However, the numbers of fully vaccinated people requiring treatment (or dying) were far lower. If you also factor in that the double vaccinated are mainly 60+ and therefore more vulnerable, this really does demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in keeping people out of hospital.

The problem though is that whilst the virus spreads though the younger age groups (particular kids and their parents in the 25 to 44 age), it gets more opportunity to hit the elderly who the vaccine wasn't effective for.

We also need to be aware that the vaccine is less effective against the delta variant so any further mutations may be even more vaccine resistant and therefore potentially make the vaccine programme a waste of time.

Sorry but your post is a bit contradictory. The number of fully vaccinated people requiring Hospital intervention being "much lower" indicates that the vaccine does stop people getting sick and dying.

The data has shown an above 80% reduction of hospitalizations of those fully vaccinated and a 65% reduction of infection rate for those protected.

Cal"

I think you are actually both agreeing. The vaccine doesn't 100% 'stop' infection. It reduces it and also can reduce severity.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

The virus isn’t going anywhere even if everyone had the jab

And not everyone believes in science because it’s an opinion

I every country will have a new strain coz as long as people been earth they always been Virus "

What, any science?

Science is not an opinion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *all me FlikWoman  over a year ago

Galaxy Far Far Away


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite "

What it utter shite is the large amount of people who died because of covid and the growing numbers of people with long covid who's lives may never to the same again.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *imes_berksMan  over a year ago

Bracknell


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite

What it utter shite is the large amount of people who died because of covid and the growing numbers of people with long covid who's lives may never to the same again."

Oh don’t worry. He will ignore that evidence

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *alandNitaCouple  over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite

What it utter shite is the large amount of people who died because of covid and the growing numbers of people with long covid who's lives may never to the same again."

As with many illnesses, people are effected differently. There are many viruses that may not present symptoms to everyone but can be easily passed on to others. Many STD's for example can happily spread around without many people knowing they are infected... until they get tested and gave to start ringing everyone they had sex with over the last 6 months.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *irtyold manMan  over a year ago

barnsley

The curent jabs dont make you imune to covid.

The virus changes too quickly like the comon cold to get one total cure.

Young are not imune they just have a more activ imune system than older.

Basicaly this is hear to stay

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ost SockMan  over a year ago

West Wales and Cardiff


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite "

That’s one person. Plenty of people are asymptomatic with covid.

I’ve just spent the last year working with hundreds upon hundreds of Covid patients. Some were seriously ill, some died. A significant number of those who died were healthy and in their twenties and thirties.

I can deal with debate about how to live life going forward, but I struggle with any argument that the last year hasn’t been different, and absolutely harrowing. There are a lot of people dead in Wales who wouldn’t have been in a normal year.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *alandNitaCouple  over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"The curent jabs dont make you imune to covid.

The virus changes too quickly like the comon cold to get one total cure.

Young are not imune they just have a more activ imune system than older.

Basicaly this is hear to stay "

The vaccines do give you an immunity, people just don't seem to know what that means. Having an immunity means that your body knows what to do if infected, not that you can't get infected at all.

There is not actually such a thing as "The common cold", this is a widely held misunderstanding. There are over 200 different viruses from different virus "families" (including coronaviruses and rhinoviruses) that are classified as "a cold".

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite

That’s one person. Plenty of people are asymptomatic with covid.

I’ve just spent the last year working with hundreds upon hundreds of Covid patients. Some were seriously ill, some died. A significant number of those who died were healthy and in their twenties and thirties.

I can deal with debate about how to live life going forward, but I struggle with any argument that the last year hasn’t been different, and absolutely harrowing. There are a lot of people dead in Wales who wouldn’t have been in a normal year."

Thank you for what you do

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *irldnCouple  over a year ago

Brighton

Not sure I am going to word this correctly but here goes...

Prior to the vaccine programme hitting a critical mass of the vulnerable/elderly we know that the vast majority of hospitalisations were from those groups, ie over 70 and/or with other health conditions.

It goes to follow that if c.95% (I believe) of that group are now vaccinated (even double dose now) then we should be seeing a corresponding fall in hospitalisations amongst that group. Still following me?

So it is therefore obvious that those still being hospitalised will now have higher proportions of younger people (ie those not until recently able to be vaccinated or with single dose). However, the key word is “proportion” because absolute numbers in hospital is dramatically lower than before.

So what I want to know is, out of that lower absolute number in hospital, are the proportion WITHIN each age demographic changing compared to before or is the pattern still the same?

Ie assuming (made up numbers) there are 5 million 20-30yr olds in UK and previously 0.1% of those were getting hospitalised (so 5,000), has that changed? If it hasn’t then saying “most of those in hospital are from younger groups” while true, is actually misleading as the overall pattern against the UK population demographics has not changed, ergo the risk profile has not changed.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eavenscentitCouple  over a year ago

barnstaple

So pleased you posted op, people need to wake up.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman  over a year ago

evesham


"So pleased you posted op, people need to wake up."

To all of the deaths and seriously ill people? To all of those still suffering almost a year on with severe medical issues thanks to having covid. You're right. People do need to wake up. Perhaps we need to investigate tin poisoning for done.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *alandNitaCouple  over a year ago

Scunthorpe


"So pleased you posted op, people need to wake up.

To all of the deaths and seriously ill people? To all of those still suffering almost a year on with severe medical issues thanks to having covid. You're right. People do need to wake up. Perhaps we need to investigate tin poisoning for done. "

Tin poisoning from foil hats?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman  over a year ago

evesham


"So pleased you posted op, people need to wake up.

To all of the deaths and seriously ill people? To all of those still suffering almost a year on with severe medical issues thanks to having covid. You're right. People do need to wake up. Perhaps we need to investigate tin poisoning for done.

Tin poisoning from foil hats?"

Yeah

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"So pleased you posted op, people need to wake up.

To all of the deaths and seriously ill people? To all of those still suffering almost a year on with severe medical issues thanks to having covid. You're right. People do need to wake up. Perhaps we need to investigate tin poisoning for done.

Tin poisoning from foil hats?

Yeah"

There's no correlation between aluminium in vaccines and any issues - but maybe we'll find it in the hats

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aralewis OP   Couple  over a year ago

South Yorkshire


"

The virus isn’t going anywhere even if everyone had the jab

And not everyone believes in science because it’s an opinion

I every country will have a new strain coz as long as people been earth they always been Virus

What, any science?

Science is not an opinion. "

Science is coz not all agree with the same outcome

And it’s like how to processes the information

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"

The virus isn’t going anywhere even if everyone had the jab

And not everyone believes in science because it’s an opinion

I every country will have a new strain coz as long as people been earth they always been Virus

What, any science?

Science is not an opinion.

Science is coz not all agree with the same outcome

And it’s like how to processes the information

"

Look to the scientific method, not individual scientists.

People do experiments or trials, they gather data, they present evidence. That evidence is then scrutinised by people who know how to do so. The process repeats. Gradually more data, more evidence is uncovered, and things get closer to "truth".

It's a complicated process but it's how we find out complicated things.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aralewis OP   Couple  over a year ago

South Yorkshire

Well I still think we’re being fooled and lied to

Example we got told stop at home to save the vulnerable and it didn’t effect young people that was only a year ago

Now the vulnerable had the jab and according to what we first got told we’d be ok and out of lockdown..now they need scare us again into complying so now it’s the young ones catching it and spreading it..Really

So wasn’t they catching it before the vulnerable had the jab and what more percentages is catching it now than before and going hospital

To say it’s at all time low hospital admission

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Well I still think we’re being fooled and lied to

Example we got told stop at home to save the vulnerable and it didn’t effect young people that was only a year ago

Now the vulnerable had the jab and according to what we first got told we’d be ok and out of lockdown..now they need scare us again into complying so now it’s the young ones catching it and spreading it..Really

So wasn’t they catching it before the vulnerable had the jab and what more percentages is catching it now than before and going hospital

To say it’s at all time low hospital admission

"

They discovered something, brand new, less than 2 years ago and they're still figuring stuff out.

... I mean is that really surprising? (Particularly as it's changing)

Are some people lying to us? Sure. If Boris told me the sky is blue I'd check. The politicians are probably lying.

So ignore the politicians.

Do you really think that a global conspiracy on this scale is actually possible? Is anyone capable of hiding it that well, so that the only "whistleblowers" sound like they've got no evidence?

... I mean come on, pull the other one.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite

Thank you dory. Just keep trolling, just keep trolling

So I’m a troll because I don’t Agree with you ! Your part of the problem ! You oxygen thief

Wishing me dead huh. What a delightful person

Grow up key board warrior "

the irony

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

“ Example we got told stop at home to save the vulnerable and it didn’t effect young people that was only a year ago”

when were we told this? i remember being told they were in a much more vulnerable position, that the risk was higher, but i don’t remember being told young people would not be effected

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Not sure I am going to word this correctly but here goes...

Prior to the vaccine programme hitting a critical mass of the vulnerable/elderly we know that the vast majority of hospitalisations were from those groups, ie over 70 and/or with other health conditions.

It goes to follow that if c.95% (I believe) of that group are now vaccinated (even double dose now) then we should be seeing a corresponding fall in hospitalisations amongst that group. Still following me?

So it is therefore obvious that those still being hospitalised will now have higher proportions of younger people (ie those not until recently able to be vaccinated or with single dose). However, the key word is “proportion” because absolute numbers in hospital is dramatically lower than before.

So what I want to know is, out of that lower absolute number in hospital, are the proportion WITHIN each age demographic changing compared to before or is the pattern still the same?

Ie assuming (made up numbers) there are 5 million 20-30yr olds in UK and previously 0.1% of those were getting hospitalised (so 5,000), has that changed? If it hasn’t then saying “most of those in hospital are from younger groups” while true, is actually misleading as the overall pattern against the UK population demographics has not changed, ergo the risk profile has not changed."

Makes sense to me.

This is why I don't like statistics. They can be twisted depending on what people want to show.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ost SockMan  over a year ago

West Wales and Cardiff


"Well I still think we’re being fooled and lied to

Example we got told stop at home to save the vulnerable and it didn’t effect young people that was only a year ago

Now the vulnerable had the jab and according to what we first got told we’d be ok and out of lockdown..now they need scare us again into complying so now it’s the young ones catching it and spreading it..Really

So wasn’t they catching it before the vulnerable had the jab and what more percentages is catching it now than before and going hospital

To say it’s at all time low hospital admission

"

Different variants affect different age groups in different ways. It’s that simple.

I’ve seen the age profile change myself over the months, at first hand.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ost SockMan  over a year ago

West Wales and Cardiff


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite

That’s one person. Plenty of people are asymptomatic with covid.

I’ve just spent the last year working with hundreds upon hundreds of Covid patients. Some were seriously ill, some died. A significant number of those who died were healthy and in their twenties and thirties.

I can deal with debate about how to live life going forward, but I struggle with any argument that the last year hasn’t been different, and absolutely harrowing. There are a lot of people dead in Wales who wouldn’t have been in a normal year.

Thank you for what you do"

Thanks - means a lot.

Still feel a bit sad and angry that some people prefer to listen to Jeff on Facebook, than those who have seen exactly what goes on at first hand

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite

That’s one person. Plenty of people are asymptomatic with covid.

I’ve just spent the last year working with hundreds upon hundreds of Covid patients. Some were seriously ill, some died. A significant number of those who died were healthy and in their twenties and thirties.

I can deal with debate about how to live life going forward, but I struggle with any argument that the last year hasn’t been different, and absolutely harrowing. There are a lot of people dead in Wales who wouldn’t have been in a normal year.

Thank you for what you do

Thanks - means a lot.

Still feel a bit sad and angry that some people prefer to listen to Jeff on Facebook, than those who have seen exactly what goes on at first hand "

Its not a vaccine its a dna altering experiment where we are the guinea pigs, basically they put some mrna thing inside which alters dna to make virus (which could actually spread virus)

Because mRNA vaccines are only now beginning to be tested in humans, there are a lot of fairly basic unknowns which can only be answered through human trials. ‘What is really the current challenge, I think, is to understand whether these vaccines will really be able to mount a sufficiently protective immune response in the human and to understand, for example, which quantities of mRNA will be needed to do this,’ said Prof. Bekeredjian-Ding.

Other outstanding questions include whether the proteins that have been chosen for the vaccine are the right ones to prevent a coronavirus infection in the body, how targeted the immune response is to this particular coronavirus, how long any immunity would last, and whether it causes side-effects such as increased inflammatory responses like redness and swelling or, in the worst case, aggravates disease.

there is still a lot of work to be done to understand this response around periods, the length of the protection it could give and whether there are any downsides

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *imes_berksMan  over a year ago

Bracknell


"“Its not a vaccine its a dna altering experiment where we are the guinea pigs, basically they put some mrna thing inside which alters dna to make virus (which could actually spread virus)

Because mRNA vaccines are only now beginning to be tested in humans, there are a lot of fairly basic unknowns which can only be answered through human trials. ‘What is really the current challenge, I think, is to understand whether these vaccines will really be able to mount a sufficiently protective immune response in the human and to understand, for example, which quantities of mRNA will be needed to do this,’ said Prof. Bekeredjian-Ding.

Other outstanding questions include whether the proteins that have been chosen for the vaccine are the right ones to prevent a coronavirus infection in the body, how targeted the immune response is to this particular coronavirus, how long any immunity would last, and whether it causes side-effects such as increased inflammatory responses like redness and swelling or, in the worst case, aggravates disease.

there is still a lot of work to be done to understand this response around periods, the length of the protection it could give and whether there are any downsides"

Apart from the first paragraph, you snipped from a Horizons article from March 2020. Evidence from the phase trials in thousands of humans in 2020 showed that with 95% efficacy at reducing effects and catching the virus that these vaccines are able to mount a sufficient immune response and hence they have sorted out the amount on mRNA to achieve this.

As for your first paragraph, which I assume is your own words (based on “some mrna thing”). Well it is so incorrect, I am lost for words

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite

That’s one person. Plenty of people are asymptomatic with covid.

I’ve just spent the last year working with hundreds upon hundreds of Covid patients. Some were seriously ill, some died. A significant number of those who died were healthy and in their twenties and thirties.

I can deal with debate about how to live life going forward, but I struggle with any argument that the last year hasn’t been different, and absolutely harrowing. There are a lot of people dead in Wales who wouldn’t have been in a normal year.

Thank you for what you do

Thanks - means a lot.

Still feel a bit sad and angry that some people prefer to listen to Jeff on Facebook, than those who have seen exactly what goes on at first hand "

Yeah. Bizarre

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

I don't know who the OP thinks told her that the virus only attacks elderly people but it doesn't. It has always infected everyone. The profile of people most severely affected were the elderly and those with vulnerabilities. But it has affected all age groups, including long-term damage to the young.

Newer variants can also be more infectious, cause more serious illness or disabilities, including over a broader range of the population.

I don't know whether OP was about getting the country into a more dangerous position, by stopping restrictions and downplaying the vaccines, under the guise of a misrepresentation of what the earler scientific evidence was. It's clear that we do have to focus on the scientific evidence from reputable sources that have been peer reviewed, not just the likes of social media or soundbite 'news' feeds, often driven by those with vested interests at heart.

Did you commit to do your bit, getting vaccinated and abiding by social restrictions, for the common good, is what we each need to ask ourselves. Half-measures produce half-hearted results that can be catastrophic. In many ways, we can almost do everything that we previously could do. We need to be grateful that our sacrifices have paid off.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

"

Those who profit most from this want it to drag on and on. And so it does.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ockdownerMan  over a year ago

Preston


"

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

"

You're mistaken

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

I tested positive for covid in January this year without a si gke symptom. Honestly not one. Not a cough. Not a fever. Not a sore throat. It was only picked up as we have a weekly pcr testing programme at work. Isolated at home for 10 days but managed to work from home fine.

So how is this convid so bad then!!! If you can test positive and not ne unwell. It’s utter utter shite

That’s one person. Plenty of people are asymptomatic with covid.

I’ve just spent the last year working with hundreds upon hundreds of Covid patients. Some were seriously ill, some died. A significant number of those who died were healthy and in their twenties and thirties.

I can deal with debate about how to live life going forward, but I struggle with any argument that the last year hasn’t been different, and absolutely harrowing. There are a lot of people dead in Wales who wouldn’t have been in a normal year.

Thank you for what you do

Thanks - means a lot.

Still feel a bit sad and angry that some people prefer to listen to Jeff on Facebook, than those who have seen exactly what goes on at first hand

Its not a vaccine its a dna altering experiment where we are the guinea pigs, basically they put some mrna thing inside which alters dna to make virus (which could actually spread virus)

Because mRNA vaccines are only now beginning to be tested in humans, there are a lot of fairly basic unknowns which can only be answered through human trials. ‘What is really the current challenge, I think, is to understand whether these vaccines will really be able to mount a sufficiently protective immune response in the human and to understand, for example, which quantities of mRNA will be needed to do this,’ said Prof. Bekeredjian-Ding.

Other outstanding questions include whether the proteins that have been chosen for the vaccine are the right ones to prevent a coronavirus infection in the body, how targeted the immune response is to this particular coronavirus, how long any immunity would last, and whether it causes side-effects such as increased inflammatory responses like redness and swelling or, in the worst case, aggravates disease.

there is still a lot of work to be done to understand this response around periods, the length of the protection it could give and whether there are any downsides"

We're so very fortunate to have instead, reputable scientific evidence that is peer-reviewed in the credible scientific literature, rather than archaic 'newsy' talking shop pieces. This has been posted ad nauseum into the forum and it doesn't make it any more valid than the junk that it is and it's ever more irrelevant in June 2021, now that the decades of research have paid off, with saving so many lives and livelihoods. Over 2 billion vaccine doses have now been given, many of them mRNA type vaccines. The biggest wealth of scientific evidence in world history in this time.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Yes, the proof that it's working is getting stronger and the "research" against it is getting ever more tenuous and absurd

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central


"Yes, the proof that it's working is getting stronger and the "research" against it is getting ever more tenuous and absurd "

Over 2 billion vaccinations given now

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Its a clinical trial

It was fast tracked for approval

Only time can tell

Even the scientists working on it are not sure of outcomes as of yet

Some people believe everything mainstream media machine tells them

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Its a clinical trial

It was fast tracked for approval

Only time can tell

Even the scientists working on it are not sure of outcomes as of yet

Some people believe everything mainstream media machine tells them

"

and some people are so full of rage against the machine that they will argue the sky is green just to go against them

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"Its a clinical trial

It was fast tracked for approval

Only time can tell

Even the scientists working on it are not sure of outcomes as of yet

Some people believe everything mainstream media machine tells them

"

I'm curious

What is the non main stream media?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Its a clinical trial

It was fast tracked for approval

Only time can tell

Even the scientists working on it are not sure of outcomes as of yet

Some people believe everything mainstream media machine tells them

I'm curious

What is the non main stream media?"

The people they agree with

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central


"Its a clinical trial

It was fast tracked for approval

Only time can tell

Even the scientists working on it are not sure of outcomes as of yet

Some people believe everything mainstream media machine tells them

"

You've not provided any reputable backing for the outlandodh unfounded claims you've posted, that are within peer-reviewed credible scientific research journals. You making such statements over and over again doesn't do anything but spread alarm and weaken any interest that you may have in wanting to help anyone.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Complete bollocks, 8 out of 10 people won’t know they’ve even had it or even get it, the rest might get a mild illness, not worthy of a doctor’s appointment, even the most vulnerable will not die in the majority, source Chris Whitty

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central


"Its a clinical trial

It was fast tracked for approval

Only time can tell

Even the scientists working on it are not sure of outcomes as of yet

Some people believe everything mainstream media machine tells them

I'm curious

What is the non main stream media?"

Karen et al, Facebook

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central


"Complete bollocks, 8 out of 10 people won’t know they’ve even had it or even get it, the rest might get a mild illness, not worthy of a doctor’s appointment, even the most vulnerable will not die in the majority, source Chris Whitty "

You've not had long Covid, organ damage etc? Vaccinated?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

That’s completely irrelevant, that’s Chris Whitty’s words not mine, unless you think he’s not telling the truth?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"Its a clinical trial

It was fast tracked for approval

Only time can tell

Even the scientists working on it are not sure of outcomes as of yet

Some people believe everything mainstream media machine tells them

I'm curious

What is the non main stream media?

The people they agree with "

The beano?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"Complete bollocks, 8 out of 10 people won’t know they’ve even had it or even get it, the rest might get a mild illness, not worthy of a doctor’s appointment, even the most vulnerable will not die in the majority, source Chris Whitty "

How about that mere 130 odd thousand?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

That’s not the figure, at least 40% covid was not the cause. again not my words but the ONS

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Its a clinical trial

It was fast tracked for approval

Only time can tell

Even the scientists working on it are not sure of outcomes as of yet

Some people believe everything mainstream media machine tells them

You've not provided any reputable backing for the outlandodh unfounded claims you've posted, that are within peer-reviewed credible scientific research journals. You making such statements over and over again doesn't do anything but spread alarm and weaken any interest that you may have in wanting to help anyone. "

Yes, funny how people who tell us to be independent and look for our own sources seem to repeat the same tired lines over and over.

I mean the anti vax stuff is even recycled from other vaccines. Methinks the leaders of the anti movement are too lazy to come up with new arguments

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

"

The vaccine certainly makes you more immune to the virus than if you didn't have the vaccine. However, the vaccine doesn't stop mutations from developing and it might exacerbate underlying issues such as your propensity to blood cots etc.

Hope that helps

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *atnip make me purrWoman  over a year ago

Reading


"Here’s a question from the government ads I’d like answered , you can still carry the convid with out symptoms !!! How the hell is that I’m sure you’d know if you had the convid I’m sure there would be symptoms. More lies from Boris and his gang of fuckwits

Not lies. You just don’t understand the word assymptomatic "

Apparently half as many as those sick with flu every year are carrying it asymptomatically.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

The vaccine certainly makes you more immune to the virus than if you didn't have the vaccine. However, the vaccine doesn't stop mutations from developing and it might exacerbate underlying issues such as your propensity to blood cots etc.

Hope that helps"

In short, the vaccines work incredibly well.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"That’s not the figure, at least 40% covid was not the cause. again not my words but the ONS"

Right.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/02/nearly-40-per-cent-recent-covid-victims-died-primarily-conditions/

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/02/nearly-40-per-cent-recent-covid-victims-died-primarily-conditions/"

Isnt the key word there..recent?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

So that has no bearing on what has happened previously? It’s changed since the start? Cognitive dissonance is real regarding this issue

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"So that has no bearing on what has happened previously? It’s changed since the start? Cognitive dissonance is real regarding this issue "

So just to be clear.. over 130,000 havent died from covid.?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"So that has no bearing on what has happened previously? It’s changed since the start? Cognitive dissonance is real regarding this issue

So just to be clear.. over 130,000 havent died from covid.?"

I think a columnist squinted and defined having a sniffle as a child* as a pre existing condition, and from that determined that the "real" death toll was under 500 people.

* I'm exaggerating, but I think it did include depression and autism, which have zero association to Covid to worsen your outcome.

It's almost like there's dishonest reporting going on by the denialists.

This is my shocked face

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I’ve not said that, why are you so defensive when information comes out that it’s not as serious, that’s weird

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"I’ve not said that, why are you so defensive when information comes out that it’s not as serious, that’s weird "

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I’ve not said that, why are you so defensive when information comes out that it’s not as serious, that’s weird

"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The police are going to be royally pissed off. They’ve spent years getting all these criminals dna then along comes Bill gates with his vaccine that changes their dna.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"The police are going to be royally pissed off. They’ve spent years getting all these criminals dna then along comes Bill gates with his vaccine that changes their dna."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ungblackbullMan  over a year ago

scotland


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal

There was a good graph in the Daily Mail yesterday (yes, really!) showing the number of cases of Delta (Indian variant) and the percentage that ended up in A&E, hospitalised or dead and then stated how many were unvaccinated, 1 dose or double dose.

This shows what we already knew. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting unwell, hospitalised or dying. However, the numbers of fully vaccinated people requiring treatment (or dying) were far lower. If you also factor in that the double vaccinated are mainly 60+ and therefore more vulnerable, this really does demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in keeping people out of hospital.

The problem though is that whilst the virus spreads though the younger age groups (particular kids and their parents in the 25 to 44 age), it gets more opportunity to hit the elderly who the vaccine wasn't effective for.

We also need to be aware that the vaccine is less effective against the delta variant so any further mutations may be even more vaccine resistant and therefore potentially make the vaccine programme a waste of time.

So have we eradicated and suppressed the Kent virus

Or is it that uk national was getting banned from entering other country it’s disappeared and the media stopped reporting it"

What are you on about?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *ungblackbullMan  over a year ago

scotland


"We get told how well the Vaccine Program going so good the they thinking of extending age group down to 30s

So if the most vulnerable had it and we was once told it doesn’t effect the young why are we still wearing mask social distances etc

Death rate low

Hospital admission low

So my question is Does the vaccine actually work coz nothing changed and I thought your meant to be immune to covid or am I mistaken

Your assessment that nothing has changed is flawed. The people who are ending up in hospitals are generally much younger and not vaccinated. There are also much less of them requiring medical intervention.

Whilst it is true that younger and healthier folk are mainly effected less by the virus, the vaccination will reduce the infection rate & number of mutations. The more people who are vaccinated the better the chances of the virus going away.

Cal

-----

There was a good graph in the Daily Mail yesterday (yes, really!) showing the number of cases of Delta (Indian variant) and the percentage that ended up in A&E, hospitalised or dead and then stated how many were unvaccinated, 1 dose or double dose.

This shows what we already knew. The vaccine doesn't stop people from getting unwell, hospitalised or dying. However, the numbers of fully vaccinated people requiring treatment (or dying) were far lower. If you also factor in that the double vaccinated are mainly 60+ and therefore more vulnerable, this really does demonstrate that the vaccine is effective in keeping people out of hospital.

The problem though is that whilst the virus spreads though the younger age groups (particular kids and their parents in the 25 to 44 age), it gets more opportunity to hit the elderly who the vaccine wasn't effective for.

We also need to be aware that the vaccine is less effective against the delta variant so any further mutations may be even more vaccine resistant and therefore potentially make the vaccine programme a waste of time.

Sorry but your post is a bit contradictory. The number of fully vaccinated people requiring Hospital intervention being "much lower" indicates that the vaccine does stop people getting sick and dying.

The data has shown an above 80% reduction of hospitalizations of those fully vaccinated and a 65% reduction of infection rate for those protected.

Cal

I think you are actually both agreeing. The vaccine doesn't 100% 'stop' infection. It reduces it and also can reduce severity. "

I think you were right.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.1562

0