FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Forget that date in June!

Forget that date in June!

Jump to: Newest in thread

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

If you are not in a monogamous relationship at that time.

You will be a part of the sexual black market.

Your only hope will be that the 'prices' to obtain will not go sky-high.

Along with yourself (dancing with the angels)

This is your future reality.

Or so the story goes....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single "
I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active."

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

"
The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

"
No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc"

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

"
I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

I think every one should be able to do what they want, within reason. I'm pro liberty if it does not effect others. It's not for me or any government to dictate terms other than what is absolutely necessary. There's a dilemma here, so I'm not overly bothered.

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

"
Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. "
A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

"
For instance future mass singularity will impact on the amount of babies born (population)

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

So for example if 70% are in monogamous relationship then the current policy may be happily received. But what about the remaining 30% singles who have different circumstances or preferences? Effectively I'm being made to "behave" through the law.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

There’s a COVID forum for all the conspiracies etc

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

"
I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"There’s a COVID forum for all the conspiracies etc

"
This is not a conspiracy but a discussion of consequences.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

"
Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"There’s a COVID forum for all the conspiracies etc

I haven’t read a conspiracy issue, I must admit. I find it to be an interesting discussion between them.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"There’s a COVID forum for all the conspiracies etc

This is not a conspiracy but a discussion of consequences."

It's an awful lot of words for very little content is what it is

Perhaps you. An clarify the 'sexual black market' you refer to?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry."

But the threat of worse consequences will be mitigated as the vaccine roll out will have been almost completed. Yes there will be those who choose not to have it and that's their risk to take.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry."

Well Im stumped. My actions are bound by law. Victorian moral times then. I become a prude except for procreation.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

What are you talking about?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"What are you talking about?"

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry.

But the threat of worse consequences will be mitigated as the vaccine roll out will have been almost completed. Yes there will be those who choose not to have it and that's their risk to take.

"
Yes it is reputed to lessen the risk of transmission.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry.

But the threat of worse consequences will be mitigated as the vaccine roll out will have been almost completed. Yes there will be those who choose not to have it and that's their risk to take.

Yes it is reputed to lessen the risk of transmission."

And the severity of symptoms

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *annaBeStrongMan over a year ago

wokingham

Sorry have I missed something?

What is this thread about?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

My concern is the apparent consensus reached by a government may effect different people in different ways. Free market and free action were the hitherto solutions.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry.

Well Im stumped. My actions are bound by law. Victorian moral times then. I become a prude except for procreation.

"
No accusation of prudishness toward you.

Just stating that if people live more separated lifestyles induced by the present circumstances (along with others) surely a natural consequence of that will be a decrease in population.

I'm not saying go fuck to save the world!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry.

Well Im stumped. My actions are bound by law. Victorian moral times then. I become a prude except for procreation.

No accusation of prudishness toward you.

Just stating that if people live more separated lifestyles induced by the present circumstances (along with others) surely a natural consequence of that will be a decrease in population.

I'm not saying go fuck to save the world!

I meant to say I want to fuck but I can't, in order to save the world and follow the law

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

My concern is the apparent consensus reached by a government may effect different people in different ways. Free market and free action were the hitherto solutions. "
(Thumbs up to that reply)

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

My concern is the apparent consensus reached by a government may effect different people in different ways. Free market and free action were the hitherto solutions. (Thumbs up to that reply)"
A sense of illicitness, being pushed underground, trading in secret...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Won't happen! I know quite a few couples who've started dating through the last 15 months! Even I found and made a bubble buddy for the last year!

Lol ...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry.

Well Im stumped. My actions are bound by law. Victorian moral times then. I become a prude except for procreation.

No accusation of prudishness toward you.

Just stating that if people live more separated lifestyles induced by the present circumstances (along with others) surely a natural consequence of that will be a decrease in population.

I'm not saying go fuck to save the world!

I meant to say I want to fuck but I can't, in order to save the world and follow the law"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Won't happen! I know quite a few couples who've started dating through the last 15 months! Even I found and made a bubble buddy for the last year!

Lol ... "
Ok that's good to hear.

But they are not everyone.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

My concern is the apparent consensus reached by a government may effect different people in different ways. Free market and free action were the hitherto solutions. (Thumbs up to that reply) A sense of illicitness, being pushed underground, trading in secret..."

Why do you reply twice to every post lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"Won't happen! I know quite a few couples who've started dating through the last 15 months! Even I found and made a bubble buddy for the last year!

Lol ... Ok that's good to hear.

But they are not everyone."

Not everyone partnered up pre covid though. Why do they have to post covid?

I think the population will be just fine.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Won't happen! I know quite a few couples who've started dating through the last 15 months! Even I found and made a bubble buddy for the last year!

Lol ... Ok that's good to hear.

But they are not everyone."
So the power of love (or necessity) will always find a way?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

"
gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

I love V for vendetta as much as the next guy or gal, and I'm always looking out for my rights being taken away for the "greater good" but I don't think you are correct in your theory

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

My concern is the apparent consensus reached by a government may effect different people in different ways. Free market and free action were the hitherto solutions. (Thumbs up to that reply) A sense of illicitness, being pushed underground, trading in secret...

Why do you reply twice to every post lol "
The first reply here to you wasn't the OP.

The OP gave a thumbs up to that reply words in brackets...

then tried answering your words about the sparesness of the theory.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

My concern is the apparent consensus reached by a government may effect different people in different ways. Free market and free action were the hitherto solutions. (Thumbs up to that reply) A sense of illicitness, being pushed underground, trading in secret...

Why do you reply twice to every post lol The first reply here to you wasn't the OP.

The OP gave a thumbs up to that reply words in brackets...

then tried answering your words about the sparesness of the theory."

That makes absolutely no sense

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

I love V for vendetta as much as the next guy or gal, and I'm always looking out for my rights being taken away for the "greater good" but I don't think you are correct in your theory "
Reread the entire thread for a better feel for the discussion.

Instead of taking the opinion of someone who arrived halfway through!

Has it really been laid out as simplistic as all that?

Plus she has mishmashed two different peoples words into an offhand opinion of her own.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

I love V for vendetta as much as the next guy or gal, and I'm always looking out for my rights being taken away for the "greater good" but I don't think you are correct in your theory Reread the entire thread for a better feel for the discussion.

Instead of taking the opinion of someone who arrived halfway through!

Has it really been laid out as simplistic as all that?

Plus she has mishmashed two different peoples words into an offhand opinion of her own."

She also said *think* because no one can make sense of your pseudo intellectual babble half of the time but it's fun trying.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"If you are not in a monogamous relationship at that time.

You will be a part of the sexual black market.

Your only hope will be that the 'prices' to obtain will not go sky-high.

Along with yourself (dancing with the angels)

This is your future reality.

Or so the story goes...."

Just for clarity. Here is the original post which says if you are not in a couple you will be traded on the sexual Black Market.... No mishmashing done by she.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *all me FlikWoman over a year ago

Galaxy Far Far Away

"Sorry have I missed something?

What is this thread about? "

Have to say I'm confused...think it's a hypothetical discussion rather than any recent news.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

My concern is the apparent consensus reached by a government may effect different people in different ways. Free market and free action were the hitherto solutions. (Thumbs up to that reply) A sense of illicitness, being pushed underground, trading in secret...

Why do you reply twice to every post lol The first reply here to you wasn't the OP.

The OP gave a thumbs up to that reply words in brackets...

then tried answering your words about the sparesness of the theory.

That makes absolutely no sense

"
You stated earlier in the thread about a whole lot of words for very little something or other.

It's funny how a reasonable person (the first man) could engage with me in a reasonable fashion.

But some (you) arrive with 'shotgun' blasting and a mish mash of words strung together purported to be all from me!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

My concern is the apparent consensus reached by a government may effect different people in different ways. Free market and free action were the hitherto solutions. (Thumbs up to that reply) A sense of illicitness, being pushed underground, trading in secret...

Why do you reply twice to every post lol The first reply here to you wasn't the OP.

The OP gave a thumbs up to that reply words in brackets...

then tried answering your words about the sparesness of the theory.

That makes absolutely no sense

You stated earlier in the thread about a whole lot of words for very little something or other.

It's funny how a reasonable person (the first man) could engage with me in a reasonable fashion.

But some (you) arrive with 'shotgun' blasting and a mish mash of words strung together purported to be all from me!"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"If you are not in a monogamous relationship at that time.

You will be a part of the sexual black market.

Your only hope will be that the 'prices' to obtain will not go sky-high.

Along with yourself (dancing with the angels)

This is your future reality.

Or so the story goes....

Just for clarity. Here is the original post which says if you are not in a couple you will be traded on the sexual Black Market.... No mishmashing done by she. "
Do you see the word traded anywhere?

I speak of its illicitness or sense of.

It's underground aspect those are the things I am getting at.

Not you will be traded by some superior exterior entity on a black market without your agreement!

You will as it were be a part of it (a trader yourself)

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"If you are not in a monogamous relationship at that time.

You will be a part of the sexual black market.

Your only hope will be that the 'prices' to obtain will not go sky-high.

Along with yourself (dancing with the angels)

This is your future reality.

Or so the story goes....

Just for clarity. Here is the original post which says if you are not in a couple you will be traded on the sexual Black Market.... No mishmashing done by she. Do you see the word traded anywhere?

I speak of its illicitness or sense of.

It's underground aspect those are the things I am getting at.

Not you will be traded by some superior exterior entity on a black market without your agreement!

You will as it were be a part of it (a trader yourself)"

Do still traded, even if by myself.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

My concern is the apparent consensus reached by a government may effect different people in different ways. Free market and free action were the hitherto solutions. (Thumbs up to that reply) A sense of illicitness, being pushed underground, trading in secret...

Why do you reply twice to every post lol The first reply here to you wasn't the OP.

The OP gave a thumbs up to that reply words in brackets...

then tried answering your words about the sparesness of the theory.

That makes absolutely no sense

You stated earlier in the thread about a whole lot of words for very little something or other.

It's funny how a reasonable person (the first man) could engage with me in a reasonable fashion.

But some (you) arrive with 'shotgun' blasting and a mish mash of words strung together purported to be all from me!

I've never purported anything of the sort. I do think you try to make your threads overly wordy and that leaves them open to interpretation, which is what I did based on your op. Is that not the basis of conversation? "
If that includes reading and getting a feel for what has been discussed before you arrived and not putting words in a persons mouth they did not say then fine.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *unloversCouple over a year ago

rotherham

Wow

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"If you are not in a monogamous relationship at that time.

You will be a part of the sexual black market.

Your only hope will be that the 'prices' to obtain will not go sky-high.

Along with yourself (dancing with the angels)

This is your future reality.

Or so the story goes....

Just for clarity. Here is the original post which says if you are not in a couple you will be traded on the sexual Black Market.... No mishmashing done by she. Do you see the word traded anywhere?

I speak of its illicitness or sense of.

It's underground aspect those are the things I am getting at.

Not you will be traded by some superior exterior entity on a black market without your agreement!

You will as it were be a part of it (a trader yourself)

Do still traded, even if by myself. "
I get you a single celibate lifestyle is another way to escape.

Or a polygamous established relationship

Or maybe other examples....this is for all those who want neither or have their own way...as you have yours.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ad NannaWoman over a year ago

East London

Are you worried that the next generation of young people will never be able to couple up and procreate; thereby threatening us with extinction?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

Instead of taking the opinion of someone who arrived halfway through!

Has it really been laid out as simplistic as all that?

Plus she has mishmashed two different peoples words into an offhand opinion of her own.

She also said *think* because no one can make sense of your pseudo intellectual babble half of the time but it's fun trying. "
No one? I'm not offended but I would say the first part of the thread just me and my comrade reasoning was just fine.

Maybe you should reread...but it might take some thought.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

Also.... I did ask for clarity around the sexual black market comment but was seemingly ignored. What else could I do but come to my own conclusion?! A conclusion not a million miles away from its apparent intent with illicit meets 'traded' between singletons.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Are you worried that the next generation of young people will never be able to couple up and procreate; thereby threatening us with extinction?"
Are you?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

Instead of taking the opinion of someone who arrived halfway through!

Has it really been laid out as simplistic as all that?

Plus she has mishmashed two different peoples words into an offhand opinion of her own.

She also said *think* because no one can make sense of your pseudo intellectual babble half of the time but it's fun trying. No one? I'm not offended but I would say the first part of the thread just me and my comrade reasoning was just fine.

Maybe you should reread...but it might take some thought."

I have my thoughts clearly in me head thank you very much and I stand by them. Many more people have asked what you are going on about that have claimed to understand it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Also.... I did ask for clarity around the sexual black market comment but was seemingly ignored. What else could I do but come to my own conclusion?! A conclusion not a million miles away from its apparent intent with illicit meets 'traded' between singletons. "
You forget about the governmental influences.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

Instead of taking the opinion of someone who arrived halfway through!

Has it really been laid out as simplistic as all that?

Plus she has mishmashed two different peoples words into an offhand opinion of her own.

Maybe you should reread...but it might take some thought.

I have my thoughts clearly in me head thank you very much and I stand by them. Many more people have asked what you are going on about that have claimed to understand it. "
That's why you are the majority...see earlier part of thread...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ouple in LancashireCouple over a year ago

in Lancashire

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

Instead of taking the opinion of someone who arrived halfway through!

Has it really been laid out as simplistic as all that?

Plus she has mishmashed two different peoples words into an offhand opinion of her own.

Maybe you should reread...but it might take some thought."

Some thought, fine..

Over thinking to the point it's not a logical debate and in the realms of they're all out to get us, no ta..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

Instead of taking the opinion of someone who arrived halfway through!

Has it really been laid out as simplistic as all that?

Plus she has mishmashed two different peoples words into an offhand opinion of her own.

Maybe you should reread...but it might take some thought.

Some thought, fine..

Over thinking to the point it's not a logical debate and in the realms of they're all out to get us, no ta..

"
So all life is completely logical.

All life is totally rational.

No room for consideration if life really so.

Every answer would be laid out on a plate and clearly obvious.

No investigation necessary

No joining the dots ever.

They are all out to get us?

Who are the ALL you speak of?

I never wrote that.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

Instead of taking the opinion of someone who arrived halfway through!

Has it really been laid out as simplistic as all that?

Plus she has mishmashed two different peoples words into an offhand opinion of her own.

Maybe you should reread...but it might take some thought.

Some thought, fine..

Over thinking to the point it's not a logical debate and in the realms of they're all out to get us, no ta..

So all life is completely logical.

All life is totally rational.

No room for consideration if life really so.

Every answer would be laid out on a plate and clearly obvious.

No investigation necessary

No joining the dots ever.

They are all out to get us?

Who are the ALL you speak of?

I never wrote that."
If life were...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I really can’t say what I want. So all I’ll say is. All the best mate.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *hatawasteMan over a year ago

stafford

"If you are not in a monogamous relationship at that time.

You will be a part of the sexual black market.

Your only hope will be that the 'prices' to obtain will not go sky-high.

Along with yourself (dancing with the angels)

This is your future reality.

Or so the story goes...."

Heading towards that dystopian future predicted in the 40 and 50s we all dreaded..

Sex provided and authorised by the government to single people .. From clean, regularly tested fuck doll employees possibly much more into the future cyborg /Robots .

The Type of doll you get is dictated by your wealth and employment of course and there would be a version for the unemployed made available too . Could be just a robotic hand job you slip into to get some kind of relief now and again.. Means tested of course

During the sex facility that is provided you would be tested, monitored and assessed and data recorded . If necessary you would be Re adjusted psychologically too so you fit back into your mundane grey work life cube afterwards and never complain .

These dolls would be not fertile of course because let's face it we have far too many children being born in the world..

Having children and how that happens would be a whole new would.

I think I just gave myself a recurring nightmare for the next week! ??

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry.

But the threat of worse consequences will be mitigated as the vaccine roll out will have been almost completed. Yes there will be those who choose not to have it and that's their risk to take.

"
So how will those who take it interact with those who do not?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"If you are not in a monogamous relationship at that time.

You will be a part of the sexual black market.

Your only hope will be that the 'prices' to obtain will not go sky-high.

Along with yourself (dancing with the angels)

This is your future reality.

Or so the story goes....

Heading towards that dystopian future predicted in the 40 and 50s we all dreaded..

Sex provided and authorised by the government to single people .. From clean, regularly tested fuck doll employees possibly much more into the future cyborg /Robots .

These dolls would be not fertile of course because let's face it we have far too many children being born in the world..

Having children and how that happens would be a whole new would.

I think I just gave myself a recurring nightmare for the next week! ??

"
No you are just considering possible extremes based on trends towards.

Done with style and humour.

Not to be taken literally...but...and some always do!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"I really can’t say what I want. So all I’ll say is. All the best mate.

"
Your best wishes are appreciated and I return the same to you.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *alandNitaCouple over a year ago

Scunthorpe

I don't understand why people still harbor this delusion of dystopia. The country (and wider world) have faced much worse events and bounced back... and beyond.

The future is brighter than we can even imagine.

Cal

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *oldswarriorMan over a year ago

Falkirk

Hmmmm reading through the post I think it's purely based on the OP's opinion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *AABMan over a year ago

Not far

Reading through all that, can I have 10 minutes of my life back?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Hmmmm reading through the post I think it's purely based on the OP's opinion.

"
This was shoved onto the virus list and I am here by default.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Hmmmm reading through the post I think it's purely based on the OP's opinion.

This was shoved onto the virus list and I am here by default."
Sort of gatecrashed.

What's going on here then! (laugh)

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *oldswarriorMan over a year ago

Falkirk

"Hmmmm reading through the post I think it's purely based on the OP's opinion.

This was shoved onto the virus list and I am here by default."

Lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ophieslutTV/TS over a year ago

Central

I had a strong belief in fairies in my garden. I hope they are alright.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"What are you talking about?

I *think* it's saying if we didn't pair up before lockdown we're doomed to be single forever and any sex we get will be illicitly traded on some sexual black market

gotcha. And thank you.

That's nonsense. No government would actually do that. Because no government actually wants to do that. They want to be reelected.

These lockdowns are having a monstrous effect on the economy. They don't really care about us but they really really care about the money in your bank account.

Instead of taking the opinion of someone who arrived halfway through!

Has it really been laid out as simplistic as all that?

Plus she has mishmashed two different peoples words into an offhand opinion of her own.

She also said *think* because no one can make sense of your pseudo intellectual babble half of the time but it's fun trying. "

. i was checking the time of the posts and trying to work out if it was 2 folk still up from saturday night and totally high having the conversation

the referring to themselves in 3rd person doesn’t help the matter either

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

honestly, not clue what is going on with most of the thread or even where the thinking for theOP cane from but with regards to this

" What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

that stopped being normality and became the exception long ago

nowadays (at least for the generation still of an age to pro create which seems to be some of the concern) you either met young at school / uni or your part time job while doing those which will still exist because thats generally not the kind of work people can do from home, or you met online on apps

meet cutes were resigned mostly to the movies about a decade ago

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *all me FlikWoman over a year ago

Galaxy Far Far Away

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry.

But the threat of worse consequences will be mitigated as the vaccine roll out will have been almost completed. Yes there will be those who choose not to have it and that's their risk to take.

So how will those who take it interact with those who do not?"

Maybe they won't...who knows!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman over a year ago

evesham

"Is this a leak from the corridors of power?

That's not so nice, I'm forever single I like people who are aware of the possibilities.

Your sunday morning thinking cap is active.

Guess Bojo got it spot on... There's hardly a reaction to this in this forum

The date is important but the possible effects go way beyond the date and will impact our future relationships.

No need for the word possible...the effects etc

Well the threshold is appeasing the majority... Anything else, well, doesn't matter

. It's a tough one. I'm not complaining but am disappointed after so long hmmm

I read you on that.

Your use of the word appeasement is interesting and the majority are seemingly OK with that (I speak beyond fab)

What of the future impact on how people used to meet and develop relationships face to face.

At work, events, parks, pubs, gyms etc etc..

Do you see that culture changing for good or is there a return to 'normality'?

In an ideal world I do my own thing and everyone else does their own way - if that makes sense

Your thinking is exactly the way I feel so you are making perfect sense.

My internal welfare (including my mental) will always trump any suffocating governmental and possibly 'sickness' inducing decree.

That's if they go too far.

No I don't mean that.

The law is what it is.

My only chance, if I'm in a minority as I am in this context as a single person, is that my reasonable preferences should be considered in decision making.

So my vote is for any such considerate government,where mere satisfaction of 51% is not the end game. A considerate government...but what of an inconsiderate government.

Would you support ANY law as such?

Because it is law?

The percentages thing we will have to await and see in this context of singularity.

If for example a government was to decree I can't meet people in normal times, because we understand that to be arbitrary, that would be cause for concern.

But in covid times it may be understandable.

I understand the understandable i.e in Covid times.

Your example below that hits on the crux of the matter.

Will Covid times ever be over?

Will the new normal possess the same opportunities as the old?

Can old normal return without restrictiveness?

Every individual will be impacted and will have to find their way through it all laws and all.

So I still state if one is not in a monogamous relationship (unless they choose celibacy) they will be part of a 'sexual black market' in a manner of speaking.

Because a certain thing will not suddenly disappear come that date in June.

Neither will the potential threat it is reputed to carry.

But the threat of worse consequences will be mitigated as the vaccine roll out will have been almost completed. Yes there will be those who choose not to have it and that's their risk to take.

So how will those who take it interact with those who do not?"

Carefully? The vaccine protects the person that has it mostly. It doesn't fully prevent transmission though so that's for the unvaccinated to work out I guess

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *nnie2009Couple over a year ago

Blackpool

"Sorry have I missed something?

What is this thread about? "
not got a clue lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Sorry have I missed something?

What is this thread about? not got a clue lol"

I do not know myself now lol.

I thought OP was saying lock down restrictions are having a disproportionate effect on singles rather than those in existing relationships. I agreed - I'm single, I can't meet new people, I can't shag, or form new relationships.

This might not affect the majority of people in existing relationships but it is nevertheless real for singles.

Finally I thought OP was saying, because of this, singles might be thinking of effectively breaking the lock down restrictions. I am not so sure about that, as I personally would not break laws.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *nnie2009Couple over a year ago

Blackpool

"If you are not in a monogamous relationship at that time.

You will be a part of the sexual black market.

Your only hope will be that the 'prices' to obtain will not go sky-high.

Along with yourself (dancing with the angels)

This is your future reality.

Or so the story goes...."
this made me laugh

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *irtyd468Man over a year ago

North

"I had a strong belief in fairies in my garden. I hope they are alright. "

Im sure the fairies talk more sense too

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *uietlykinkymeWoman over a year ago

kinky land

Have a little positively

We locked down to save our NHS, our NHS is not under the same pressure and slowly all the rules are fizzling out

Singles can mingle again soon

and some proper heat & sun are showing on the horizon

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *eeleyWoman over a year ago

Dudley

Well fuck a duck, this is the weirdest thread I've come across today.

Tbh, I've always traded my vag on the black market, I even sold a kidney once.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *olly_chromaticTV/TS over a year ago

Stockport

Maybe this black market meets in quiet laybys and car parks at night, with people turning up in cars or lorries. Then some of the people indulge in illicit shagging while others look on, taking photos and wanking?

I'll bet that the covid police will be going round the cars and demanding to see vaccine passports, though really it'll just be an excuse for the dirty buggers to have a perve while they're on night duty...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *naswingdressWoman over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

"Maybe this black market meets in quiet laybys and car parks at night, with people turning up in cars or lorries. Then some of the people indulge in illicit shagging while others look on, taking photos and wanking?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Apparently it's pseudoscience to have a moan about extended government imposed celibacy for me.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Sorry have I missed something?

What is this thread about? not got a clue lol

I do not know myself now lol.

This might not affect the majority of people in existing relationships but it is nevertheless real for singles.

Finally I thought OP was saying, because of this, singles might be thinking of effectively breaking the lock down restrictions. I am not so sure about that, as I personally would not break laws.

"
?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic