FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Only 32 in 74000 people
Only 32 in 74000 people
Jump to: Newest in thread
According to sky news only 32 people have been admitted to hospital 3 weeks after having the jab out of the 74,000 people admitted with the virus this year.
That’s a pretty good stat. And it follows on to say that they were all in the elderly population. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago
Dudley |
"According to sky news only 32 people have been admitted to hospital 3 weeks after having the jab out of the 74,000 people admitted with the virus this year.
That’s a pretty good stat. And it follows on to say that they were all in the elderly population. "
Great news, I wonder how the doom and gloom people will spin it?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to sky news only 32 people have been admitted to hospital 3 weeks after having the jab out of the 74,000 people admitted with the virus this year.
That’s a pretty good stat. And it follows on to say that they were all in the elderly population.
Great news, I wonder how the doom and gloom people will spin it? "
Judging by the weird private messages we got they are going down the conspiracy line. Rather than the gloom |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to sky news only 32 people have been admitted to hospital 3 weeks after having the jab out of the 74,000 people admitted with the virus this year.
That’s a pretty good stat. And it follows on to say that they were all in the elderly population.
Great news, I wonder how the doom and gloom people will spin it? "
The world destabilisation agenda is nearing completion. The Martians and the elite are taking over. Wake up sheeple.
... Baa |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago
Dudley |
"According to sky news only 32 people have been admitted to hospital 3 weeks after having the jab out of the 74,000 people admitted with the virus this year.
That’s a pretty good stat. And it follows on to say that they were all in the elderly population.
Great news, I wonder how the doom and gloom people will spin it?
Judging by the weird private messages we got they are going down the conspiracy line. Rather than the gloom"
I've had some great messages lately about all the conspiracies, the things people believe are truly astonishing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago
Dudley |
"According to sky news only 32 people have been admitted to hospital 3 weeks after having the jab out of the 74,000 people admitted with the virus this year.
That’s a pretty good stat. And it follows on to say that they were all in the elderly population.
Great news, I wonder how the doom and gloom people will spin it?
The world destabilisation agenda is nearing completion. The Martians and the elite are taking over. Wake up sheeple.
... Baa"
You forgot the lizard people. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Those poor 32  "
they were only admitted. Doesn't say anything about them passing on.
OP this is really good news. Hopefully will encourage even more to get their vaccine. I've been told my daughter will get her 2nd in the next 2 weeks and I will feel so much better then x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
That is really really good news. So the 34 are the ones that were affected negatively by the virus irrespective of the jab thats a 0.045% basically less than 1%
Boris should open the country up.. People are suffering from mental health issues. The vaccine should be accelerated..if we put all our resources we could fully vaccinate the entire adult population by End of May |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"That is really really good news. So the 34 are the ones that were affected negatively by the virus irrespective of the jab thats a 0.045% basically less than 1%
Boris should open the country up.. People are suffering from mental health issues. The vaccine should be accelerated..if we put all our resources we could fully vaccinate the entire adult population by End of May"
Boris is opening the country up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Yes he is but don't you think the pace is slow. What happened to the Moderna Vaccine 17million doses. Why can't they start offering to 18 to 30s.
I tell you alot of the 18 to 30s would take the vaccine willingly if that's what it takes to get normality back. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes he is but don't you think the pace is slow. What happened to the Moderna Vaccine 17million doses. Why can't they start offering to 18 to 30s.
I tell you alot of the 18 to 30s would take the vaccine willingly if that's what it takes to get normality back."
The pace is determined by the need to see the effect of unlocking.
Supply and ability to administer vaccines are issues. I've certainly not been jabbed yet (and I will be), and I'm over 30.
Single jab is not full treatment for this for any vaccine approved in the UK - and we're nowhere near protecting the vast majority of the population. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yea you're right and I understand that..i understand the need for caution but if they were to invest resources into vaccination, we could open the country up quicker. "
What do you think they're doing?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to sky news only 32 people have been admitted to hospital 3 weeks after having the jab out of the 74,000 people admitted with the virus this year.
That’s a pretty good stat. And it follows on to say that they were all in the elderly population.
Great news, I wonder how the doom and gloom people will spin it? "
Do people really do that? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"According to sky news only 32 people have been admitted to hospital 3 weeks after having the jab out of the 74,000 people admitted with the virus this year.
That’s a pretty good stat. And it follows on to say that they were all in the elderly population.
Great news, I wonder how the doom and gloom people will spin it?
Do people really do that? "
You better believe it....!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I've had the jab and support it
You really need to understand the data though
They had data on only 1700 individuals, and of those 1700 they identifued 32 who had one jab.
Most of the 70,000 cases relate to before we'd even started jabbing! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I've had the jab and support it
You really need to understand the data though
They had data on only 1700 individuals, and of those 1700 they identifued 32 who had one jab.
Most of the 70,000 cases relate to before we'd even started jabbing! "
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/22/extraordinary-covid-jab-data-is-misleading-but-the-numbers-are-still-hugely-positive?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I've had the jab and support it
You really need to understand the data though
They had data on only 1700 individuals, and of those 1700 they identifued 32 who had one jab.
Most of the 70,000 cases relate to before we'd even started jabbing! "
All data has limitations and is based on the time it's gathered. But I think the encouraging picture is also seen with, say, the CDC breakthrough infection data. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I've had the jab and support it
You really need to understand the data though
They had data on only 1700 individuals, and of those 1700 they identifued 32 who had one jab.
Most of the 70,000 cases relate to before we'd even started jabbing!
All data has limitations and is based on the time it's gathered. But I think the encouraging picture is also seen with, say, the CDC breakthrough infection data."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"That is really really good news. So the 34 are the ones that were affected negatively by the virus irrespective of the jab thats a 0.045% basically less than 1%
Boris should open the country up.. People are suffering from mental health issues. The vaccine should be accelerated..if we put all our resources we could fully vaccinate the entire adult population by End of May"
Sounds risky |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago
Dudley |
Still very encouraging news. Honestly, im happy to read good news instead of all the conspiracies and negativity!
The vaccine is working, better than was expected so I'm satisfied its been a success so far. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"That is really really good news. So the 34 are the ones that were affected negatively by the virus irrespective of the jab thats a 0.045% basically less than 1%
Boris should open the country up.. People are suffering from mental health issues. The vaccine should be accelerated..if we put all our resources we could fully vaccinate the entire adult population by End of May"
I think you have a point re going faster. But my assumption is that the pace is determined by the availability of the supplies of vaccines. We hit over 800k a day a month ago... We were told April was going to be slower due to supply constraints.... Supply is always going to be an issue.
Lets not forget we need to get a grip of our borders too...
And make faster and better decisions re red list countries.
And lastly... We need all our near neighbours to have a successful vaccine program completed too.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *tarskyMan
over a year ago
South Devon |
According to the government’s official statistics (available https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reaction), there have been c.700,000 adverse reactions and c.1,000 fatalities for the Pfizer and AstraZenica jabs alone! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to the government’s official statistics (available https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reaction), there have been c.700,000 adverse reactions and c.1,000 fatalities for the Pfizer and AstraZenica jabs alone! "
Do you know a sore arm counts as an adverse reaction?
How does that compare to the deaths and disabilities caused by Covid? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *tarskyMan
over a year ago
South Devon |
You do realise that all the adverse reactions have been categorised so you can see exactly what constitutes an ‘adverse reaction’?
The point is that the Sky report, identified by the OP, is patently misleading. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You do realise that all the adverse reactions have been categorised so you can see exactly what constitutes an ‘adverse reaction’?
The point is that the Sky report, identified by the OP, is patently misleading."
So is your scaremongering. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is no spin in those official reports or the way I have cited it."
... Having actually pulled up the site you posted, I'm going to call bullshit. It's full of "we're figuring this out, we have to do the analysis" type stuff.
You know how people keep saying "got hit by a bus, died with Covid?"
The scientists are trying to figure out if people died/suffered illness with Covid vaccines or of Covid vaccine.
To try to paint anything as definitive in a complex, fast moving, relatively new situation is bullshit on stilts. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago
Dudley |
"There is no spin in those official reports or the way I have cited it."
Actually you're wrong, the yellow card scheme is to report side effects/ reactions potentially caused by the vaccines. Note the word potentially.
A direct quote from this page
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
'The nature of Yellow Card reporting means that reported events are not always proven side effects. Some events may have happened anyway, regardless of vaccination.'
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is no spin in those official reports or the way I have cited it.
Actually you're wrong, the yellow card scheme is to report side effects/ reactions potentially caused by the vaccines. Note the word potentially.
A direct quote from this page
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
'The nature of Yellow Card reporting means that reported events are not always proven side effects. Some events may have happened anyway, regardless of vaccination.'
"
The US equivalent had a report that someone turned into the Incredible Hulk after a vaccine 
It's potentially useful but it's also potentially a lot of made up bullshit |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago
Dudley |
"There is no spin in those official reports or the way I have cited it.
Actually you're wrong, the yellow card scheme is to report side effects/ reactions potentially caused by the vaccines. Note the word potentially.
A direct quote from this page
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
'The nature of Yellow Card reporting means that reported events are not always proven side effects. Some events may have happened anyway, regardless of vaccination.'
The US equivalent had a report that someone turned into the Incredible Hulk after a vaccine
It's potentially useful but it's also potentially a lot of made up bullshit "
It literally states on the page that they are only reported reactions, not proven to be anything to do with the vaccine, yet people still quote it as 'OMG LOOK AT THESE REACTIONS AND DEATHS FROM THE VACCINES'.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is no spin in those official reports or the way I have cited it.
Actually you're wrong, the yellow card scheme is to report side effects/ reactions potentially caused by the vaccines. Note the word potentially.
A direct quote from this page
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
'The nature of Yellow Card reporting means that reported events are not always proven side effects. Some events may have happened anyway, regardless of vaccination.'
The US equivalent had a report that someone turned into the Incredible Hulk after a vaccine
It's potentially useful but it's also potentially a lot of made up bullshit
It literally states on the page that they are only reported reactions, not proven to be anything to do with the vaccine, yet people still quote it as 'OMG LOOK AT THESE REACTIONS AND DEATHS FROM THE VACCINES'.
"
People who follow anti vaxxers call it VAERS dumpster diving. (Name of the US one) Because there's potentially useful information there, but people go through it and don't distinguish the good from the utter garbage. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago
Dudley |
"There is no spin in those official reports or the way I have cited it.
Actually you're wrong, the yellow card scheme is to report side effects/ reactions potentially caused by the vaccines. Note the word potentially.
A direct quote from this page
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
'The nature of Yellow Card reporting means that reported events are not always proven side effects. Some events may have happened anyway, regardless of vaccination.'
The US equivalent had a report that someone turned into the Incredible Hulk after a vaccine
It's potentially useful but it's also potentially a lot of made up bullshit
It literally states on the page that they are only reported reactions, not proven to be anything to do with the vaccine, yet people still quote it as 'OMG LOOK AT THESE REACTIONS AND DEATHS FROM THE VACCINES'.
People who follow anti vaxxers call it VAERS dumpster diving. (Name of the US one) Because there's potentially useful information there, but people go through it and don't distinguish the good from the utter garbage."
Shame they don't go and take a dive elsewhere |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
