FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Furlough
Furlough
Jump to: Newest in thread
 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Source definitely needed ..not only for the information, but the funding of said furlough extension. Not saying it's not necessary, but I think it's time the gov started to provide some insight into how they intend to pay for all this 'free' money, they keep doling out. " Governments can only get there money from either the Taxpayers, printing money , Borrowing, or big business, or Tax raids ,don’t forget there is always a price to pay | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Source definitely needed ..not only for the information, but the funding of said furlough extension. Not saying it's not necessary, but I think it's time the gov started to provide some insight into how they intend to pay for all this 'free' money, they keep doling out. Governments can only get there money from either the Taxpayers, printing money , Borrowing, or big business, or Tax raids ,don’t forget there is always a price to pay " Yep and as I was saying, I'd be interested to know which method/s they intend to use this time round. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Source definitely needed ..not only for the information, but the funding of said furlough extension. Not saying it's not necessary, but I think it's time the gov started to provide some insight into how they intend to pay for all this 'free' money, they keep doling out. Governments can only get there money from either the Taxpayers, printing money , Borrowing, or big business, or Tax raids ,don’t forget there is always a price to pay Yep and as I was saying, I'd be interested to know which method/s they intend to use this time round. " Do you notice its never talked about in the News going to surprise us ,but rest assured most of us are going to be a lot poorer | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Source definitely needed ..not only for the information, but the funding of said furlough extension. Not saying it's not necessary, but I think it's time the gov started to provide some insight into how they intend to pay for all this 'free' money, they keep doling out. " It is to hopefully keep people from losing their jobs, I for one don't mind keep working and probably pay more tax in the future so most people have jobs to go back to What I don't want to pay for is the contracts worth millions given to Government donators or the failed TTI disaster which I know we will all end up paying for too | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I can't give you the source because you will all call me a conspiracy theorist. If my source is correct. It will be public knowledge soon enough. I hope I'm wrong but I promise hand on heart. When they extended furlough in October to April. I said. That's when the lockdown will end. Sure enough they told us at new year that lockdown will continue till February. March at the latest (Hopefully) which means just in time for the end of furlough. Just passing on what I've heard. Don't shoot the messenger lol." It's under consideration..no decision has yet been made .. that's from the government website | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I can't give you the source because you will all call me a conspiracy theorist. If my source is correct. It will be public knowledge soon enough. I hope I'm wrong but I promise hand on heart. When they extended furlough in October to April. I said. That's when the lockdown will end. Sure enough they told us at new year that lockdown will continue till February. March at the latest (Hopefully) which means just in time for the end of furlough. Just passing on what I've heard. Don't shoot the messenger lol. It's under consideration..no decision has yet been made .. that's from the government website " Under consideration tallys with what I've learned. Time will tell.  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I can't give you the source because you will all call me a conspiracy theorist. If my source is correct. It will be public knowledge soon enough. I hope I'm wrong but I promise hand on heart. When they extended furlough in October to April. I said. That's when the lockdown will end. Sure enough they told us at new year that lockdown will continue till February. March at the latest (Hopefully) which means just in time for the end of furlough. Just passing on what I've heard. Don't shoot the messenger lol. It's under consideration..no decision has yet been made .. that's from the government website Under consideration tallys with what I've learned. Time will tell. "Hardly top secret info is it ? Was reported 4 days ago | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I can't give you the source because you will all call me a conspiracy theorist. If my source is correct. It will be public knowledge soon enough. I hope I'm wrong but I promise hand on heart. When they extended furlough in October to April. I said. That's when the lockdown will end. Sure enough they told us at new year that lockdown will continue till February. March at the latest (Hopefully) which means just in time for the end of furlough. Just passing on what I've heard. Don't shoot the messenger lol. It's under consideration..no decision has yet been made .. that's from the government website Under consideration tallys with what I've learned. Time will tell.
Hardly top secret info is it ?
Was reported 4 days ago "Reported as "under consideration". My source says "it's going to happen" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I can't give you the source because you will all call me a conspiracy theorist. If my source is correct. It will be public knowledge soon enough. I hope I'm wrong but I promise hand on heart. When they extended furlough in October to April. I said. That's when the lockdown will end. Sure enough they told us at new year that lockdown will continue till February. March at the latest (Hopefully) which means just in time for the end of furlough. Just passing on what I've heard. Don't shoot the messenger lol. It's under consideration..no decision has yet been made .. that's from the government website Under consideration tallys with what I've learned. Time will tell.
Hardly top secret info is it ?
Was reported 4 days ago
Reported as "under consideration".
My source says "it's going to happen""Sourse ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Did anyone notice that the first day biden was in power, he re joined the W.H.O? That same day the WHO said that the cycle threshold for PCR tests had been too high. Should be 30 cycles max to get a fairly accurate reading. Our NHS run the cycles at 40 to 45. This will give a much higher false positive number. Biden re joins W.H.O. cycle threshold changes. Cases fall. Biden's a hero "Oh goody, someone else who's read that rubbish narrative about that WHO document *facepalm* | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Did anyone notice that the first day biden was in power, he re joined the W.H.O? That same day the WHO said that the cycle threshold for PCR tests had been too high. Should be 30 cycles max to get a fairly accurate reading. Our NHS run the cycles at 40 to 45. This will give a much higher false positive number. Biden re joins W.H.O. cycle threshold changes. Cases fall. Biden's a hero
Oh goody, someone else who's read that rubbish narrative about that WHO document *facepalm*"Aww. Someone else who follows the BBC and MSM to find the truth about stuff. Like I said. Dont shoot the messenger. It's a friendly discussion. Not an opportunity for angry "woke" people to insult others. Grow up love | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Can't tell you sorry. If my source is wrong. Fair enough. I'm just sharing info "You can share information sourced from a filthy bog wall but it doesn't potentially have much value. The type of source that you have could add some level of credibility. No need to go all coy, after you've had your big leak | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"It's not going to be all systems go on February 15th and it seems wiser to implement measures for more than 5 minutes at a time They reportedly want this to be the final lockdown. As results are slow, it's too early to say how slowly we will start to emerge from it. How will you be if it's summer? " If it July, how will it effect students Sophie? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Can't tell you sorry. If my source is wrong. Fair enough. I'm just sharing info
You can share information sourced from a filthy bog wall but it doesn't potentially have much value. The type of source that you have could add some level of credibility. No need to go all coy, after you've had your big leak"It's not from a dodgy blog although most will think it is. It's from a government source. He may be wrong. I'm.just sharing it as a possibility. To be fair though. If they're discussing it in parliament you can be sure my comments aren't necessarily baseless | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Did anyone notice that the first day biden was in power, he re joined the W.H.O? That same day the WHO said that the cycle threshold for PCR tests had been too high. Should be 30 cycles max to get a fairly accurate reading. Our NHS run the cycles at 40 to 45. This will give a much higher false positive number. Biden re joins W.H.O. cycle threshold changes. Cases fall. Biden's a hero
Oh goody, someone else who's read that rubbish narrative about that WHO document *facepalm*
Aww. Someone else who follows the BBC and MSM to find the truth about stuff.
Like I said. Dont shoot the messenger. It's a friendly discussion. Not an opportunity for angry "woke" people to insult others.
Grow up love "
Yeah. Yeah I know about the details of the WHO documents from the BBC. Pull the other one.
A friendly discussion where you have inside knowledge we're not to question because you know, but anyone questioning you needs to grow up? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Source definitely needed ..not only for the information, but the funding of said furlough extension. Not saying it's not necessary, but I think it's time the gov started to provide some insight into how they intend to pay for all this 'free' money, they keep doling out. Governments can only get there money from either the Taxpayers, printing money , Borrowing, or big business, or Tax raids ,don’t forget there is always a price to pay " Apparently some thread users are of the opinion it's free money that never needs to be paid back... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I can't give you the source because you will all call me a conspiracy theorist. If my source is correct. It will be public knowledge soon enough. I hope I'm wrong but I promise hand on heart. When they extended furlough in October to April. I said. That's when the lockdown will end. Sure enough they told us at new year that lockdown will continue till February. March at the latest (Hopefully) which means just in time for the end of furlough. Just passing on what I've heard. Don't shoot the messenger lol. It's under consideration..no decision has yet been made .. that's from the government website Under consideration tallys with what I've learned. Time will tell.
Hardly top secret info is it ?
Was reported 4 days ago "Well also we aren't coming out of this anytime soon. Given we've pressed the release button too soon twice already.... Third times a charm. I can't see us getting out of this till Aug / september graduated opening through till early next year. Theres no magic wand to suddenly change things. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Did anyone notice that the first day biden was in power, he re joined the W.H.O? That same day the WHO said that the cycle threshold for PCR tests had been too high. Should be 30 cycles max to get a fairly accurate reading. Our NHS run the cycles at 40 to 45. This will give a much higher false positive number. Biden re joins W.H.O. cycle threshold changes. Cases fall. Biden's a hero
Oh goody, someone else who's read that rubbish narrative about that WHO document *facepalm*
Aww. Someone else who follows the BBC and MSM to find the truth about stuff.
Like I said. Dont shoot the messenger. It's a friendly discussion. Not an opportunity for angry "woke" people to insult others.
Grow up love
Yeah. Yeah I know about the details of the WHO documents from the BBC. Pull the other one.
A friendly discussion where you have inside knowledge we're not to question because you know, but anyone questioning you needs to grow up?"Absolutely not. Of course you should question. I've done that since February last year. Face palming someone trying to give a heads up from a source actually in government is a bit unfair though. It's ok though. If he's wrong and I'm wrong. It's not harmed anyone. If he's right. Will you resend your palm ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Did anyone notice that the first day biden was in power, he re joined the W.H.O? That same day the WHO said that the cycle threshold for PCR tests had been too high. Should be 30 cycles max to get a fairly accurate reading. Our NHS run the cycles at 40 to 45. This will give a much higher false positive number. Biden re joins W.H.O. cycle threshold changes. Cases fall. Biden's a hero "If false positives are really such a problem how do you explain the healthcare workers who get weekly testing since last April and have not had a positive test yet? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Did anyone notice that the first day biden was in power, he re joined the W.H.O? That same day the WHO said that the cycle threshold for PCR tests had been too high. Should be 30 cycles max to get a fairly accurate reading. Our NHS run the cycles at 40 to 45. This will give a much higher false positive number. Biden re joins W.H.O. cycle threshold changes. Cases fall. Biden's a hero
Oh goody, someone else who's read that rubbish narrative about that WHO document *facepalm*
Aww. Someone else who follows the BBC and MSM to find the truth about stuff.
Like I said. Dont shoot the messenger. It's a friendly discussion. Not an opportunity for angry "woke" people to insult others.
Grow up love
Yeah. Yeah I know about the details of the WHO documents from the BBC. Pull the other one.
A friendly discussion where you have inside knowledge we're not to question because you know, but anyone questioning you needs to grow up?
Absolutely not. Of course you should question. I've done that since February last year.
Face palming someone trying to give a heads up from a source actually in government is a bit unfair though.
It's ok though. If he's wrong and I'm wrong. It's not harmed anyone.
If he's right. Will you resend your palm ? "No, because you've given no reason why you should be regarded as credible, more than one reason why you shouldn't, and respond to criticism with denier bingo. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I'm sure your "source" is glad you can be trusted with such highly secretive and sensitive material. And I'm sure your source's employer is pleased they have such a trustworthy employee. " he said its looking like this will happen. He didn't say it will. Chill out. Virtue signalling is really unflattering  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Did anyone notice that the first day biden was in power, he re joined the W.H.O? That same day the WHO said that the cycle threshold for PCR tests had been too high. Should be 30 cycles max to get a fairly accurate reading. Our NHS run the cycles at 40 to 45. This will give a much higher false positive number. Biden re joins W.H.O. cycle threshold changes. Cases fall. Biden's a hero
Oh goody, someone else who's read that rubbish narrative about that WHO document *facepalm*
Aww. Someone else who follows the BBC and MSM to find the truth about stuff.
Like I said. Dont shoot the messenger. It's a friendly discussion. Not an opportunity for angry "woke" people to insult others.
Grow up love
Yeah. Yeah I know about the details of the WHO documents from the BBC. Pull the other one.
A friendly discussion where you have inside knowledge we're not to question because you know, but anyone questioning you needs to grow up?
Absolutely not. Of course you should question. I've done that since February last year.
Face palming someone trying to give a heads up from a source actually in government is a bit unfair though.
It's ok though. If he's wrong and I'm wrong. It's not harmed anyone.
If he's right. Will you resend your palm ?
No, because you've given no reason why you should be regarded as credible, more than one reason why you shouldn't, and respond to criticism with denier bingo."You're right. I haven't given a reason. I never said it was a fact. It was a bit of interesting info that clearly goes against what your opinion is. You know. That opinion you've been taught by MSM that makes you think its your own . There are more sources of info than the BBC you know | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
I actually hope he's wrong btw. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I can't give you the source because you will all call me a conspiracy theorist. If my source is correct. It will be public knowledge soon enough. I hope I'm wrong but I promise hand on heart. When they extended furlough in October to April. I said. That's when the lockdown will end. Sure enough they told us at new year that lockdown will continue till February. March at the latest (Hopefully) which means just in time for the end of furlough. Just passing on what I've heard. Don't shoot the messenger lol." What you have said is only partially true .. from what I have found out ( not sure of how exactly it works or is planned to ) the government have given individual councils the right to extend furlough until July this year ( or something like that ?) .. if they need to or the situation dictates it .. So currently all support for everyone due to end in April . . Which is still no useful news for all of us who have yet to receive 1p from the government simply because of the job we do! Hopefully something in Seiss 4 But let's see what happens with all things ' furlough' in the next month or so . | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Did anyone notice that the first day biden was in power, he re joined the W.H.O? That same day the WHO said that the cycle threshold for PCR tests had been too high. Should be 30 cycles max to get a fairly accurate reading. Our NHS run the cycles at 40 to 45. This will give a much higher false positive number. Biden re joins W.H.O. cycle threshold changes. Cases fall. Biden's a hero
Oh goody, someone else who's read that rubbish narrative about that WHO document *facepalm*
Aww. Someone else who follows the BBC and MSM to find the truth about stuff.
Like I said. Dont shoot the messenger. It's a friendly discussion. Not an opportunity for angry "woke" people to insult others.
Grow up love
Yeah. Yeah I know about the details of the WHO documents from the BBC. Pull the other one.
A friendly discussion where you have inside knowledge we're not to question because you know, but anyone questioning you needs to grow up?
Absolutely not. Of course you should question. I've done that since February last year.
Face palming someone trying to give a heads up from a source actually in government is a bit unfair though.
It's ok though. If he's wrong and I'm wrong. It's not harmed anyone.
If he's right. Will you resend your palm ?
No, because you've given no reason why you should be regarded as credible, more than one reason why you shouldn't, and respond to criticism with denier bingo.
You're right. I haven't given a reason. I never said it was a fact. It was a bit of interesting info that clearly goes against what your opinion is. You know. That opinion you've been taught by MSM that makes you think its your own . There are more sources of info than the BBC you know "Yes, and there are more sources than BBC/MSM/Sky/The Man or whackadoodle dandy | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"That being said. IF furlough is suddenly extended to July. Won't you look stupid
I actually hope he's wrong btw. "Not particularly. Making decisions on the basis of "some guy on a swinging site who believes in denier stuff has a friend who says some stuff he won't give evidence for" is not clever. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Source definitely needed ..not only for the information, but the funding of said furlough extension. Not saying it's not necessary, but I think it's time the gov started to provide some insight into how they intend to pay for all this 'free' money, they keep doling out. Governments can only get there money from either the Taxpayers, printing money , Borrowing, or big business, or Tax raids ,don’t forget there is always a price to pay Yep and as I was saying, I'd be interested to know which method/s they intend to use this time round. Do you notice its never talked about in the News going to surprise us ,but rest assured most of us are going to be a lot poorer " Well the ones of us left with a job will be paying more tax,ifyou drive i should imagine your gona gwt murderd on fuel duty and more cuts coming.austerity for the last ten years is gona look like the good times | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Did anyone notice that the first day biden was in power, he re joined the W.H.O? That same day the WHO said that the cycle threshold for PCR tests had been too high. Should be 30 cycles max to get a fairly accurate reading. Our NHS run the cycles at 40 to 45. This will give a much higher false positive number. Biden re joins W.H.O. cycle threshold changes. Cases fall. Biden's a hero
Oh goody, someone else who's read that rubbish narrative about that WHO document *facepalm*
Aww. Someone else who follows the BBC and MSM to find the truth about stuff.
Like I said. Dont shoot the messenger. It's a friendly discussion. Not an opportunity for angry "woke" people to insult others.
Grow up love
Yeah. Yeah I know about the details of the WHO documents from the BBC. Pull the other one.
A friendly discussion where you have inside knowledge we're not to question because you know, but anyone questioning you needs to grow up?"I suppose it depends on how you question, yours didn't add anything to the discussion, it sends a discussion a different way | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
