FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Police

Police

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *ent in Black OP   Man  over a year ago

Silsden

So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

"

Just saw that.

Well over the top

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ty31Man  over a year ago

NW London

Heavy handed. Lacks common sense.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ent in Black OP   Man  over a year ago

Silsden

A warning would have been more appropriate I reckon.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

I've not seen the fuller details but it would seem prudent to take hot drinks with you, in very cold weather. Many types of exercise also benefit from swift consumption of nutrition, whether solid or in liquid form.

If these people were legally entitled to exercise in the way they were, then this falls to the definition of a 'picnic'. If picnics are inappropriately defined in the law, then it needs resolution. If it's a poor interpretation of this definition, then it needs action to clarify that and to prevent future misapplication of the law. It would seem appropriate for this charge to be dropped against those who have had it levied.

There were reports of people being charged for sitting down, during intermittent exercise bursts last year and that later being accepted as an approved measure, I think.

Even if sat at a public picnic table, whilst consuming hot drinks, it would not reasonably be classed as a pucnic.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Thats just ridiculous.

They were remaining local.

Being sensible going in seperate cars.

Meeting 1 person outside is allowed.

And so is daily exercise!

In the Winter I have taken to carrying a flask of hot drink when I drive anywhere in case I break down. It's just common sense to have that to keep you hydrated and warm.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton

Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ty31Man  over a year ago

NW London


"I've not seen the fuller details but it would seem prudent to take hot drinks with you, in very cold weather. Many types of exercise also benefit from swift consumption of nutrition, whether solid or in liquid form.

If these people were legally entitled to exercise in the way they were, then this falls to the definition of a 'picnic'. If picnics are inappropriately defined in the law, then it needs resolution. If it's a poor interpretation of this definition, then it needs action to clarify that and to prevent future misapplication of the law. It would seem appropriate for this charge to be dropped against those who have had it levied.

There were reports of people being charged for sitting down, during intermittent exercise bursts last year and that later being accepted as an approved measure, I think.

Even if sat at a public picnic table, whilst consuming hot drinks, it would not reasonably be classed as a pucnic. "

According to Priti Patel, officers could now fine people found sitting on public benches

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham

The same force that sent drones up to spy on walkers during the first lockdown!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *exy_HornyCouple  over a year ago

Leigh

5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ig9incherforuMan  over a year ago

Welwyn


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined."

Shame on them for wanting to see a friend....

Police state coming

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andyfloss2000Woman  over a year ago

ashford

Totally over the top yes! X

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eerobCouple  over a year ago

solihull

I think if they contest these tickets they will get off. There are definately worse breaches....silly to give police bad name in these circs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *atEvolutionCouple  over a year ago

atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-55560814

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined."

What is local?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman  over a year ago

On a mooch

I think it comes down to why do you need to drive to take a walk, you can walk out your front door and walk.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman  over a year ago

On a mooch


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

What is local?"

As per the government site

If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live

So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined."

When you have sloppy legislation then it's open to interpretation by Police and others, there is no legally defined limit of what constitutes local so whilst 50 mile would be excessive 5 is not ...

Common sense needs to be applied, and by the comments made about a drink being a picnic it's clearly lacking in the officer who came out with such bollocks..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

What is local?

As per the government site

If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live

So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough

"

Cant see what they have done wrong tbh and the legal fella seems to agree.

Seems unnecessarily heavy handed

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

What is local?

As per the government site

If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live

So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough

"

Which as you know in some boroughs is a lot more than others, Chelsea and Westminster as opposed to Greenwich or Croydon is much different..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ik MMan  over a year ago

Lancashire


"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements "

GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *exy_HornyCouple  over a year ago

Leigh


"What is local?"

There is guidance on the gov website, pretty much says your village or your part of town.

We would define it as setting off on foot or by bike from your own house.

We have a nature reserve a few miles away, we sometimes walk or cycle there from our house. We never drive there as we are too tight to pay for parking. Before the latest lockdown it never ceased to amaze us how many people drove there, paid for parking, and then had "exercise" walking from their car to the chip van at the end of the car park. 300m from the car park the crowds thinned out.

Since the lockdown we have walked 2 miles every day in a circle from our house. Very boring, on the road etc. but it is exercise.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If local why drive? It does say avoid travel during lockdown

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"What is local?

There is guidance on the gov website, pretty much says your village or your part of town.

We would define it as setting off on foot or by bike from your own house.

We have a nature reserve a few miles away, we sometimes walk or cycle there from our house. We never drive there as we are too tight to pay for parking. Before the latest lockdown it never ceased to amaze us how many people drove there, paid for parking, and then had "exercise" walking from their car to the chip van at the end of the car park. 300m from the car park the crowds thinned out.

Since the lockdown we have walked 2 miles every day in a circle from our house. Very boring, on the road etc. but it is exercise."

But it's going to vary depending on where you live isnt it?

Like I said,just seems well over the top.

Hope they fight it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Pity the police aren’t as on the ball with drug dealers and grooming gangs.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *arkus1812Man  over a year ago

Lifes departure lounge NN9 Northamptonshire East not West MidlandsMidlands


"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements

GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous... "

Germany in the 1930s comes to mind

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *exy_HornyCouple  over a year ago

Leigh


"But it's going to vary depending on where you live isnt it?"

No, pretty much everyone can walk from their house to get exercise. It may not be scenic or even particularly pleasant but it fulfills the requirement for exercise.

Our daily walk is neither scenic or pleasant but it is necessary.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oan of DArcCouple  over a year ago

Glasgow


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

"

Think the main issue was driving out of county, they were stopped in Derbyshire, but lived in Leicestershire.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements

GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous...

Germany in the 1930s comes to mind"

Really??

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *wisted999Man  over a year ago

North Bucks

I wonder what the real context is.....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oggoneMan  over a year ago

Derry


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

"

Wasn't this Derbyshire constabulary? They have a history of this idiocy. It will be thrown out of court.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Shame on them travelling to have some recreation time, it's ok to travel for work or shopping mixing with hundreds of people. But go 5 miles for yourself and your fined, keep just working and paying taxes and your ok. Are we getting it now a worker bee puts the hive first and doesn't have me time, welcome to the new world order.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ljamMan  over a year ago

Edinburgh

The articles I've read make it seem pretty heavy handed, but they've been presented mainly from the two walkers' point of view. They did cross county lines though, so I guess they should have known better...

It's really a pretty insignificant incident though, when you consider we're brushing up against four figure daily deaths... maybe just walk out your front door to get your exercise.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eard-lincolnMan  over a year ago

near lincoln

5 mile radius of where they were is only very small villages , and there are numerous parks and places in the area. I’m guessing the 5 miles is not true. Would be interested to see where they did in fact live. There’s also a picture of them both smiling holding their coffees in hand so can’t have been to distraught.

They also said when they arrived there that there was police vehicles already in the car park , so guessing that loads of people have been visiting there and police were cracking down on everyone.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *uck-RogersMan  over a year ago

Tarka trail

Picnic's are nice, But prefer a snickers.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"5 mile radius of where they were is only very small villages , and there are numerous parks and places in the area. I’m guessing the 5 miles is not true. Would be interested to see where they did in fact live. There’s also a picture of them both smiling holding their coffees in hand so can’t have been to distraught.

They also said when they arrived there that there was police vehicles already in the car park , so guessing that loads of people have been visiting there and police were cracking down on everyone. "

Maybe the picture wasnt taken straight after it happened ?

Like the poster says above.. in the scheme of things it very insignificant

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements

GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous...

Germany in the 1930s comes to mind

Really??"

Yes, let's await for tier nein

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ljamMan  over a year ago

Edinburgh


"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements

GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous...

Germany in the 1930s comes to mind

Really??

Yes, let's await for tier nein "

That'd be all reich

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *uttyandbeeCouple  over a year ago

Leeds

So as regular walkers which we intend to do this weekend are we liable to be fined if we take a pack up and a flask of hot soup?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *rHotNottsMan  over a year ago

Dubai & Nottingham

This is odd because all the country parks are selling hot drinks and snacks to people walking , there’s even tables out at some

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eard-lincolnMan  over a year ago

near lincoln

Looking at Starbucks locations as well the nearest one is 8 miles away at ashby de la zouch or 10 miles away at burton on Trent .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lirty-CoupleCouple  over a year ago

Bexley


"So as regular walkers which we intend to do this weekend are we liable to be fined if we take a pack up and a flask of hot soup?"

Possibly if some police person decides it's a picnic not exercise...

There's a video going around on twitter showing a guy who politely confronted a group of police all sitting around having a coffee in a cafe somewhere. His question was why are they allowed to do it when ordinary people aren't.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oved Up 2Couple  over a year ago

nottingham

Derbyshire police again. Imagine saying a takeaway coffee is a picnic lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *himp_KittenCouple  over a year ago

Preston

Always ones to offer a different view regardless of the argument..

In our opinion should they be fined.. no.. we're sure a little advice and sending them on their way would suffice.. However...

We don't know if they were offered advice and decided to argue against this resulting in enforcement.

We do know that the latest guidance / rules states :-

"You must not leave, or be outside of your home except where necessary"

Was it really necessary to go to starbucks together, then drive to an area 5 miles from your home to meet up together to go for a walk..

We'd argue not.

We also know :-

"Exercise with your household (or support bubble) or one other person, this should be limited to once per day, and you should not travel outside your local area."

So in this context they went for exercise with one other person, but is crossing the boundaries of your village / town to exercise outside of your "local area"

Well we'd argue it is, what's wrong with walking from your door step and remaining local.

The guidance also states

"If you do leave home for a permitted reason, you should always stay local - unless it is necessary to go further, for example to go to work. Stay local means stay in the village, town, or part of the city where you live."

It clearly states where to stay, not to travel to starbucks then take another journey 5 miles away crossing a boundary to go for a walk..

In our opinion it's just two people breaking the guidance and whining about it.

Was it over the top to fine them, perhaps, however we don't have the full context so a balanced view is hard to reach.

All we know is we've not be fined, but we're not driving to starbucks to get a drink to drive 5 miles from our house for a walk.. we leave our house, walk locally and come home.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool

The stuff about the hot drink is pathetic

Who the fuck sits there and makes up this stuff?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The police service droids have overreacted from the get go. There is no law that says that you have to wear a mask. There is no official exemption certificate. Even the governments own website states, that there is no reason to account for yourself. None of the regulations are actually in the coronavirus legislation. So they are as far as i understand subordinate to the act. Government advice is not law. The police can turn up mob handed by the dozens but cant attend a burglary. There are plenty of websites showing the gross over reaction of the police. The law i believe is ultra vires. Which is a legitimate defence in court. If someone is brave enough to take this to its ultimate conclusion then the supreme Court judges the police acted ultra viresly then every arrest and fine would be deemed unlawful. Every fine and arrest would be open for compensation and civil action could be taken against the police for wrongful arrest. What would make this all unlawful, is for the sole purpose of protecting the nhs. The mass incarceration of the nation and defacto removal of the rights of the population. To protect a single government organisation must be at some point unlawful

My son is a covid nurse.

Covid is real but the authorities response verges on the police state

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"A warning would have been more appropriate I reckon."

Yep I agree,bit over the top where a warning might have been suffice.

Having said that,why drive 5 miles to exercise?if they live apart,why not walk n meet half way?

What's with the hot drinks to exercise?

Had they been warned before?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I th8nk they can appeal against the fine

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *olidOak85Couple  over a year ago

Yorkshire


"Always ones to offer a different view regardless of the argument..

In our opinion should they be fined.. no.. we're sure a little advice and sending them on their way would suffice.. However...

We don't know if they were offered advice and decided to argue against this resulting in enforcement.

We do know that the latest guidance / rules states :-

"You must not leave, or be outside of your home except where necessary"

Was it really necessary to go to starbucks together, then drive to an area 5 miles from your home to meet up together to go for a walk..

We'd argue not.

We also know :-

"Exercise with your household (or support bubble) or one other person, this should be limited to once per day, and you should not travel outside your local area."

So in this context they went for exercise with one other person, but is crossing the boundaries of your village / town to exercise outside of your "local area"

Well we'd argue it is, what's wrong with walking from your door step and remaining local.

The guidance also states

"If you do leave home for a permitted reason, you should always stay local - unless it is necessary to go further, for example to go to work. Stay local means stay in the village, town, or part of the city where you live."

It clearly states where to stay, not to travel to starbucks then take another journey 5 miles away crossing a boundary to go for a walk..

In our opinion it's just two people breaking the guidance and whining about it.

Was it over the top to fine them, perhaps, however we don't have the full context so a balanced view is hard to reach.

All we know is we've not be fined, but we're not driving to starbucks to get a drink to drive 5 miles from our house for a walk.. we leave our house, walk locally and come home.

"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ee And MikeCouple  over a year ago

Cannock

The police are loving this, you try reporting a terrorist bomber or someone breaking into your car or home and they are too busy playing with their cocks !

However break the COVID rules and it’s all out war on the public, thank god they aren’t armed because they’d be shooting people for buying a non-essential item if you let them.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eard-lincolnMan  over a year ago

near lincoln


"The police service droids have overreacted from the get go. There is no law that says that you have to wear a mask. There is no official exemption certificate. Even the governments own website states, that there is no reason to account for yourself. None of the regulations are actually in the coronavirus legislation. So they are as far as i understand subordinate to the act. Government advice is not law. The police can turn up mob handed by the dozens but cant attend a burglary. There are plenty of websites showing the gross over reaction of the police. The law i believe is ultra vires. Which is a legitimate defence in court. If someone is brave enough to take this to its ultimate conclusion then the supreme Court judges the police acted ultra viresly then every arrest and fine would be deemed unlawful. Every fine and arrest would be open for compensation and civil action could be taken against the police for wrongful arrest. What would make this all unlawful, is for the sole purpose of protecting the nhs. The mass incarceration of the nation and defacto removal of the rights of the population. To protect a single government organisation must be at some point unlawful

My son is a covid nurse.

Covid is real but the authorities response verges on the police state"

Police have always attended any burglary I’ve reported. Hate seeing this used in every argument against the police. They are set their tasks like everyone else.

If there wasn’t so many idiots about doing what they wanted regardless then these two people would probably not have a story to tell. That redo our is obviously a hotspot for people flouncing the law.

No One needs to take the police to court to fight them. Just bloody behave .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eard-lincolnMan  over a year ago

near lincoln


"The police are loving this, you try reporting a terrorist bomber or someone breaking into your car or home and they are too busy playing with their cocks !

However break the COVID rules and it’s all out war on the public, thank god they aren’t armed because they’d be shooting people for buying a non-essential item if you let them.

"

What a load of crap. Of course it’s the polices fault that people still do as they choose without a care .

I rang the police yesterday to report some kids graffitiing a local landmark and they were there in under 5 minutes

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The fine is justified on the grounds of taking two cars on a 10 mile round trip without good reason.

Whatever happened to the clean air experienced during the first lockdown?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *uietlykinkymeWoman  over a year ago

kinky land

I think Derbyshire police can't win.

Local residents complain about the number of people travelling to their area and when the police are not rescuing visitors stuck in their cars, in snow, and proactively trying to stop visitors getting into difficulty, they are slated for handing out fines

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *himp_KittenCouple  over a year ago

Preston


"I think Derbyshire police can't win.

Local residents complain about the number of people travelling to their area and when the police are not rescuing visitors stuck in their cars, in snow, and proactively trying to stop visitors getting into difficulty, they are slated for handing out fines "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ostafunMan  over a year ago

near ipswich

The advice is stay at home you do not need to drive 5 miles to take a walk.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *bthreeCouple  over a year ago

Yeovil

Clearly the 2 people involved failed the "attitude test"unless thats been banned too.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *estivalMan  over a year ago

borehamwood


"The fine is justified on the grounds of taking two cars on a 10 mile round trip without good reason.

Whatever happened to the clean air experienced during the first lockdown?"

i should imagine its got something to do with it being sunny and warm the first lock down and below freezing this time round.myself im still on the bike you warm up within ten mins

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andyfloss2000Woman  over a year ago

ashford


"The fine is justified on the grounds of taking two cars on a 10 mile round trip without good reason.

Whatever happened to the clean air experienced during the first lockdown?

i should imagine its got something to do with it being sunny and warm the first lock down and below freezing this time round.myself im still on the bike you warm up within ten mins"

Yes me to even at 3 15 in morn when I leave for work ! When I get there people say did u cycle ? I say I allways do I dont drive lol! It was icy this morn x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ee And MikeCouple  over a year ago

Cannock


"The police are loving this, you try reporting a terrorist bomber or someone breaking into your car or home and they are too busy playing with their cocks !

However break the COVID rules and it’s all out war on the public, thank god they aren’t armed because they’d be shooting people for buying a non-essential item if you let them.

What a load of crap. Of course it’s the polices fault that people still do as they choose without a care .

I rang the police yesterday to report some kids graffitiing a local landmark and they were there in under 5 minutes "

You must live in a quiet place then, because our youngest daughter who lives in Manchester was in bed one Sunday morning (after working a night shift) when an intruder broke into her bedroom after ransacking her flat, he could have assaulted or killed her but luckily he just ran off.

We poke to Greater Manchester Police after they refused to come out to the incident, their attitude was they were far too too busy and gave my daughter a crime number.

Disgraceful to say the least !

We put an official complaint in writing and the reply that came back almost blamed my daughter for living where she did.

The police need to start and remember it’s our taxes that pay to keep them in a job, there’s no gold shower of money from heaven to do that !

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"The police are loving this, you try reporting a terrorist bomber or someone breaking into your car or home and they are too busy playing with their cocks !

However break the COVID rules and it’s all out war on the public, thank god they aren’t armed because they’d be shooting people for buying a non-essential item if you let them.

What a load of crap. Of course it’s the polices fault that people still do as they choose without a care .

I rang the police yesterday to report some kids graffitiing a local landmark and they were there in under 5 minutes

You must live in a quiet place then, because our youngest daughter who lives in Manchester was in bed one Sunday morning (after working a night shift) when an intruder broke into her bedroom after ransacking her flat, he could have assaulted or killed her but luckily he just ran off.

We poke to Greater Manchester Police after they refused to come out to the incident, their attitude was they were far too too busy and gave my daughter a crime number.

Disgraceful to say the least !

We put an official complaint in writing and the reply that came back almost blamed my daughter for living where she did.

The police need to start and remember it’s our taxes that pay to keep them in a job, there’s no gold shower of money from heaven to do that !"

Shocking that.

Werent they supposed to be hiring more plod?

We had to go to a station a while ago..it was 8 at night and we visited 4 until we found one that was open.

They must be cut to the bone.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined."

Absolutely

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

Absolutely"

What's the difference between taking a walk and a social wander?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

What do people really expect when they’re blinding following “rules” and believing all the propaganda they hear? You wanted state control, here it is.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ostafunMan  over a year ago

near ipswich


"What do people really expect when they’re blinding following “rules” and believing all the propaganda they hear? You wanted state control, here it is. "
You ran out of tinfoil mate?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman  over a year ago

On a mooch


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

What is local?

As per the government site

If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live

So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough

Cant see what they have done wrong tbh and the legal fella seems to agree.

Seems unnecessarily heavy handed

"

The exercise they are doing, walking, can be done straight from your front door, you don’t need to get in your car, grab a takeaway tea and drive five miles to then have a walk

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

When you have sloppy legislation then it's open to interpretation by Police and others, there is no legally defined limit of what constitutes local so whilst 50 mile would be excessive 5 is not ...

Common sense needs to be applied, and by the comments made about a drink being a picnic it's clearly lacking in the officer who came out with such bollocks..

"

is the 5 mile limit only in scotland then? we definitely have a defined 5 miles

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman  over a year ago

On a mooch


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

What is local?

As per the government site

If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live

So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough

Which as you know in some boroughs is a lot more than others, Chelsea and Westminster as opposed to Greenwich or Croydon is much different.."

Oh totally, some boroughs are huge and some aren’t. I live in a large borough, but I can’t get to the other side of it unless I wanted to walk for 2 hours plus or use public transport. I’ve literally stuck to my 2 sq mile neighbourhood when in T3/T4/lockdown

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *un guy 30Man  over a year ago

hyde

Unbelievable

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eard-lincolnMan  over a year ago

near lincoln


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

Absolutely

What's the difference between taking a walk and a social wander?"

The guidance says you can meet one other person for exercise but then also says this

Meeting other people

It is against the law to meet socially with family or friends unless they are part of your household or support bubble. You cannot leave home for recreational or leisure purposes (such as for a picnic or a social meeting).

So to meet for a social wander is different to taking a walk for exercise

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What do people really expect when they’re blinding following “rules” and believing all the propaganda they hear? You wanted state control, here it is. "

I don't want state control. I just want an end to the pandemic.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Always ones to offer a different view regardless of the argument..

In our opinion should they be fined.. no.. we're sure a little advice and sending them on their way would suffice.. However...

We don't know if they were offered advice and decided to argue against this resulting in enforcement.

We do know that the latest guidance / rules states :-

"You must not leave, or be outside of your home except where necessary"

Was it really necessary to go to starbucks together, then drive to an area 5 miles from your home to meet up together to go for a walk..

We'd argue not.

We also know :-

"Exercise with your household (or support bubble) or one other person, this should be limited to once per day, and you should not travel outside your local area."

So in this context they went for exercise with one other person, but is crossing the boundaries of your village / town to exercise outside of your "local area"

Well we'd argue it is, what's wrong with walking from your door step and remaining local.

The guidance also states

"If you do leave home for a permitted reason, you should always stay local - unless it is necessary to go further, for example to go to work. Stay local means stay in the village, town, or part of the city where you live."

It clearly states where to stay, not to travel to starbucks then take another journey 5 miles away crossing a boundary to go for a walk..

In our opinion it's just two people breaking the guidance and whining about it.

Was it over the top to fine them, perhaps, however we don't have the full context so a balanced view is hard to reach.

All we know is we've not be fined, but we're not driving to starbucks to get a drink to drive 5 miles from our house for a walk.. we leave our house, walk locally and come home.

"

2 sides to everything

in the grand scheme of things yes maybe heavy handed but a warning wouldn’t likely have made the news and possibly they (rightly or wrongly) have been made an example of to demonstrate that enforcements are actually now happening... after all ho many threads and comments have we seen along the lines of no point having laws if you don’t enforce them as people will just disregard them

the likelihood of them paying it is low but the message that the police are getting tougher on what they believe to be people flouting the rules is now out there

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

"

I think the police probably have a ridiculously hard job currently, having viewed the response of the woman who filmed the Glostershire hospital when she was arrested you can imagine a scenario where they where quite entitled, rude, offensive etc when questioned.

I wasn’t there, I’m not going to judge the girls or indeed the police, it will be looked at properly in due course I’m sure. X

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oan of DArcCouple  over a year ago

Glasgow


"

is the 5 mile limit only in scotland then? we definitely have a defined 5 miles "

In England there are currently restrictions on inter county travel.

They were in Derbyshire and the article claims one of them lives in Ashby de la Zouch which is in Leicestershire, I suspect this is the real reason they were fined.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think exercise is supposed to start and end at home, not with the car. And it’s not the fault of the police, there have been multiple queries to all levels about what is deemed local. It is also not law, but guidance, it stated on an article today, that the police then have to interpret and discretionary choice etc on whom would be fined. It appeared heavy handed on paper but without black and white rules to implement and promote, these cases will come up.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ecretpassion100Couple  over a year ago

Walsall

Well i do think this is heavy handed but examples need to be set

People who are moaning about lockdown should adear otherwise we will be in this for a long time to come and thats fact !!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *elshcouple18Couple  over a year ago

Cardiff


"Totally over the top yes! X"
would it be over the top if one was covid positive, gave it to the other, then took it back home to their family?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I just think it's all gone too far now.

I've heard all sorts of stories about people being stopped going to the supermarket because there's a convenience store closer.

I'm sorry but I'll shop where ever I like. This is hard enough.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Totally over the top yes! X would it be over the top if one was covid positive, gave it to the other, then took it back home to their family? "

Yes because its the risk they take.

It seems the government think we are no longer able to assess that on our own

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ostafunMan  over a year ago

near ipswich

even with a 5 mile radius you can still be mixing in the same place as someone from 10 miles away from you, its not hard stay at home ,i bet these very same people were out clapping for the nhs last night.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

To be fair I can see Both sides,Ashby is a very beautiful place and plenty of places to go for a walk out of the way of everyone else and they did cross into another county but giving them a telling off for having a warm drink with them takes the piss a little,

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined."

No law to say what local actually means. 5 miles is hardly travelling out of town is it. Some peoples nearest countryside is that far or more. Country has gone crackers. Ok for them to pile into Tesco with 200 other people though.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ethnmelvCouple  over a year ago

Cardiff

I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The questions we would like answering is what where the police doing in such numbers in a remote location ? Skiving off and worried about being caught ? Also what rules where they observing for social distancing when using enclosed vehicles to travel from the station to that location ? The reporting seems wrong as well. The corona laws are for gatherings. The guidance on staying home, social distancing and keeping to your local area etc are not laws and not enforceable. Unless the persons left there local area which is in a high tier group to enter another area of a lower tier. Plus as there is no set definition or distance for local area within UK law. This would be assessed as possibly be your parish, Town or local council/authority area.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andyfloss2000Woman  over a year ago

ashford


"Totally over the top yes! X would it be over the top if one was covid positive, gave it to the other, then took it back home to their family? "

Soooooo in supermarket mixing with god knows how many????? X

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eavenscentitCouple  over a year ago

barnstaple

[Removed by poster at 08/01/21 16:11:43]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ethnmelvCouple  over a year ago

Cardiff

Welsh rules - There are no limits on the distance you can travel during exercise, though the nearer you stay to your home, the better. Your exercise should start and finish from your home and you should exercise alone or with a member of your household or support bubble

Basically don’t drive to a place of excercise...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *elshcouple18Couple  over a year ago

Cardiff


"Welsh rules - There are no limits on the distance you can travel during exercise, though the nearer you stay to your home, the better. Your exercise should start and finish from your home and you should exercise alone or with a member of your household or support bubble

Basically don’t drive to a place of excercise..."

i see we are roughly 10 miles from eachother, so if we both walk 5 miles, we could meet within the rules, as long as we social distance, Think not!!! That's where there's lack of clarity.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eard-lincolnMan  over a year ago

near lincoln


"The questions we would like answering is what where the police doing in such numbers in a remote location ? Skiving off and worried about being caught ? Also what rules where they observing for social distancing when using enclosed vehicles to travel from the station to that location ? The reporting seems wrong as well. The corona laws are for gatherings. The guidance on staying home, social distancing and keeping to your local area etc are not laws and not enforceable. Unless the persons left there local area which is in a high tier group to enter another area of a lower tier. Plus as there is no set definition or distance for local area within UK law. This would be assessed as possibly be your parish, Town or local council/authority area. "

Police rules have changed since Wednesday I think . They now have the power to fine you . The police were there because there was most likely lots of people going there for the same reason these two were . They would have fined anyone that couldn’t prove they were local.

And if highlighting these two stops others from risking it then I’m all for it .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Tbh the police can twist anything to there advantage but if the people new each other and they went to the same place at the same time they its hard to prove it wasn't arranged if it was more local they would have been ok

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Very true I agree 100%

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

"

The same force that used drones to try and shame families out walking in the Peak District in the summer isn’t it? Doesn’t surprise me. Massively ott

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better."

Apparently you can travel.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *elshcouple18Couple  over a year ago

Cardiff


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. "

but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ecretpassion100Couple  over a year ago

Walsall

Back in the first lockdown here in pdi people were scared to be on the streets ...the police stopped everyone even looking inside shopping bags to make sure essential items were brought during the shop and could only go to nearest shop to where you were ...fined on the spot if breaking the rules ... that's why it's safer here and infection rates low amongst other things ... fines need to be given and rules adhered to ...otherwise this will never go away ...you can take exercise anywhere without getting in a car to do so ...you can buy food local wherever you are ...easy for us to say as not currently in the uk but if was would be very strict adhering to every rule and regulations but it won't work if not everyone is doing it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ittleMissCaliWoman  over a year ago

all loved up


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

"

I've read this story and apparently the police were waiting in some numbers for people to turn up at a local reservoir.. as in several police vehicles.. so they were waiting to catch people.

I think they are being very heavy handed.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ye-spyMan  over a year ago

London

The police have become revenue collectors.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *litterbabeWoman  over a year ago

hiding from cock pics.

In England you can travel to exercise currently and meet one person from outside of your home or bubble.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman  over a year ago

On a mooch


"In England you can travel to exercise currently and meet one person from outside of your home or bubble."

That is true but not outside of your local area.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *andy 1Couple  over a year ago

northeast


"Always ones to offer a different view regardless of the argument..

In our opinion should they be fined.. no.. we're sure a little advice and sending them on their way would suffice.. However...

We don't know if they were offered advice and decided to argue against this resulting in enforcement.

We do know that the latest guidance / rules states :-

"You must not leave, or be outside of your home except where necessary"

Was it really necessary to go to starbucks together, then drive to an area 5 miles from your home to meet up together to go for a walk..

We'd argue not.

We also know :-

"Exercise with your household (or support bubble) or one other person, this should be limited to once per day, and you should not travel outside your local area."

So in this context they went for exercise with one other person, but is crossing the boundaries of your village / town to exercise outside of your "local area"

Well we'd argue it is, what's wrong with walking from your door step and remaining local.

The guidance also states

"If you do leave home for a permitted reason, you should always stay local - unless it is necessary to go further, for example to go to work. Stay local means stay in the village, town, or part of the city where you live."

It clearly states where to stay, not to travel to starbucks then take another journey 5 miles away crossing a boundary to go for a walk..

In our opinion it's just two people breaking the guidance and whining about it.

Was it over the top to fine them, perhaps, however we don't have the full context so a balanced view is hard to reach.

All we know is we've not be fined, but we're not driving to starbucks to get a drink to drive 5 miles from our house for a walk.. we leave our house, walk locally and come home.

"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *konCouple  over a year ago

cardiff

Totally draconian

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

This happened to somebody I know. He was dropping his mom home and both got £300 fine because they wasn't from same house hold

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I wonder what the real context is....."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. "

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *sGivesWoodWoman  over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"Pity the police aren’t as on the ball with drug dealers and grooming gangs. "

They aren't such easy targets.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial."

Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day.

"

What someone going for a walk?

But packed schools and shops are fine?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day.

What someone going for a walk?

But packed schools and shops are fine?"

Neither.

There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules.

If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules.

But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *aintscoupleCouple  over a year ago

st helens

The police seem to be very selective on who they dish out fines to. This lockdown does not seem to have affected our local drug dealers.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ools and the brainCouple  over a year ago

couple, us we him her.

Not ridiculous at all.

It sends out a clear message.

"Stop fucking around and bending the rules or else"

Unfortunately the hard work has to start somewhere .

Remember the crazy scenes last year.

Thousands of people at durdle door?

Hundreds of thousands on Brighton beach and other costal resorts.

Traffic queues a mile or two long going to Snowdon.

Unfortunately people HAVE to understand why they can't do certain things.

I am all for exercise and fresh air but why the need to travel miles away?

What a sad time we live in tho, people getting fined for going for a walk and a natter with a mate.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think the rules need to be binary at this stage in the proceedings.It also makes it easier for the police who generally struggle when it comes to exercising their discretion.

If the rules state that people shouldn't be meeting outside of their household (unless it falls within one of the well documented and understood exceptions) then people shouldn't be meeting outside of their household. Exercise, coffee, sex, whatever - it shouldn't be happening - particularly when we are currently recording more than 1000 deaths a day. One of the reasons we're all still stuck in this mess is that many people can't seem to stick to the rules complicated.

Exercise alone - it's not complicated and it might save someone's life.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial."

what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious

also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Exercise up and down your stairs and if you are outside without a valid reason arrested and prison until lockdown is over.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day.

What someone going for a walk?

But packed schools and shops are fine?

Neither.

There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules.

If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules.

But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang."

100% agree ... people want to follow the letter also means there are loopholes when principals based approach of what are we trying to achieve here seems much better way to look at it

unfortunately the law has to work on the letter of and not the principal so we will always have places it doesn’t quite fit or seem to make sense but thats why we have judges to set precedent and interpret the law

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious

also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other "

1000s of people are dying because people are going out for walks?

And not because of schools or shops or most places of businesses that have stayed open?

I meant the actual incident is trivial..the legal expert on the link clearly states they have broke no rules but clearly this is up for debate.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 08/01/21 17:58:33]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eard-lincolnMan  over a year ago

near lincoln


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious

also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other

1000s of people are dying because people are going out for walks?

And not because of schools or shops or most places of businesses that have stayed open?

I meant the actual incident is trivial..the legal expert on the link clearly states they have broke no rules but clearly this is up for debate. "

After reading up on what the expert writes, he seems intent on providing people with loopholes to flout the coronavirus guidelines. And has been doing so since March. His Twitter feed is him arguing with other experts that have a different take on the guidelines .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *mmabluTV/TS  over a year ago

upton wirral


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

"

Sounds it but there attitude may have been the problem we do not know this

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *limmatureguyMan  over a year ago

Tonbridge

I France you were allowed to be up to 1km from home. That is far enough for exercise. If you are exercising you don't need a hot drink.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"The police service droids have overreacted from the get go. There is no law that says that you have to wear a mask. There is no official exemption certificate. Even the governments own website states, that there is no reason to account for yourself. None of the regulations are actually in the coronavirus legislation. So they are as far as i understand subordinate to the act. Government advice is not law. The police can turn up mob handed by the dozens but cant attend a burglary. There are plenty of websites showing the gross over reaction of the police. The law i believe is ultra vires. Which is a legitimate defence in court. If someone is brave enough to take this to its ultimate conclusion then the supreme Court judges the police acted ultra viresly then every arrest and fine would be deemed unlawful. Every fine and arrest would be open for compensation and civil action could be taken against the police for wrongful arrest. What would make this all unlawful, is for the sole purpose of protecting the nhs. The mass incarceration of the nation and defacto removal of the rights of the population. To protect a single government organisation must be at some point unlawful

My son is a covid nurse.

Covid is real but the authorities response verges on the police state"

Absolutely superb but as I've been saying for months, there's hundreds and hundreds on this site alone running and begging for a police state

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"The police service droids have overreacted from the get go. There is no law that says that you have to wear a mask. There is no official exemption certificate. Even the governments own website states, that there is no reason to account for yourself. None of the regulations are actually in the coronavirus legislation. So they are as far as i understand subordinate to the act. Government advice is not law. The police can turn up mob handed by the dozens but cant attend a burglary. There are plenty of websites showing the gross over reaction of the police. The law i believe is ultra vires. Which is a legitimate defence in court. If someone is brave enough to take this to its ultimate conclusion then the supreme Court judges the police acted ultra viresly then every arrest and fine would be deemed unlawful. Every fine and arrest would be open for compensation and civil action could be taken against the police for wrongful arrest. What would make this all unlawful, is for the sole purpose of protecting the nhs. The mass incarceration of the nation and defacto removal of the rights of the population. To protect a single government organisation must be at some point unlawful

My son is a covid nurse.

Covid is real but the authorities response verges on the police state

Police have always attended any burglary I’ve reported. Hate seeing this used in every argument against the police. They are set their tasks like everyone else.

If there wasn’t so many idiots about doing what they wanted regardless then these two people would probably not have a story to tell. That redo our is obviously a hotspot for people flouncing the law.

No One needs to take the police to court to fight them. Just bloody behave . "

Perhaps living in Greater Manchester you might be different.. Over 80,000 crimes shoved under the carpet

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"The advice is stay at home you do not need to drive 5 miles to take a walk."

Does it actually say 5 miles?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"What do people really expect when they’re blinding following “rules” and believing all the propaganda they hear? You wanted state control, here it is. "

Yep, absolutely. People have been begging for it and now it's started.. Will they relinquish this power?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious

also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other

1000s of people are dying because people are going out for walks?

And not because of schools or shops or most places of businesses that have stayed open?

I meant the actual incident is trivial..the legal expert on the link clearly states they have broke no rules but clearly this is up for debate. "

1000s of people are dying because people cant just stay at home within their own bubble and therefore are creating additional opportunities for the virus to spread

wether that be pals out walking at reservoirs , people visiting family in houses, swingers having meets or whole households packing into the shops together when one parent could go on their own ... it all adds to the problem

stay at home as much as possible ... thats the message ... bugger the law its the responsible thing to do

have you heard her interview? she sounds smug entitled and loving the media attention around it to me ... hardly an essential trip for her mental health although that is just my opinion so i await the barrage of abuse for it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *crumdiddlyumptiousMan  over a year ago

.

Fined while traveling in separate cars and being out in the open.

I would just ignore/refuse to pay the fine the fine while electricians, Builders, factory workers etc are being told you can go to work

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"To be fair I can see Both sides,Ashby is a very beautiful place and plenty of places to go for a walk out of the way of everyone else and they did cross into another county but giving them a telling off for having a warm drink with them takes the piss a little,"

Isn't it better, especially in the winter, to take a warm/hot drink with you rather than calling into a cafe for a take away and possibly coming into contact with someone?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better."

That's old hat now. So last year. However, you're closer to a police state than England.. Remember, we don't have an assembly..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ecretlyASoftieWoman  over a year ago

Hull but travel regularly


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined.

Shame on them for wanting to see a friend....

Police state coming

"

Coming? It’s here! At least they didn’t have snowballs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman  over a year ago

On a mooch


"To be fair I can see Both sides,Ashby is a very beautiful place and plenty of places to go for a walk out of the way of everyone else and they did cross into another county but giving them a telling off for having a warm drink with them takes the piss a little,

Isn't it better, especially in the winter, to take a warm/hot drink with you rather than calling into a cafe for a take away and possibly coming into contact with someone? "

You missed the point they were carrying takeaway drinks then from a well known supplier then

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day.

What someone going for a walk?

But packed schools and shops are fine?

Neither.

There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules.

If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules.

But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang."

You vill have no rights left vatsover

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oggoneMan  over a year ago

Derry


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious

also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other

1000s of people are dying because people are going out for walks?

And not because of schools or shops or most places of businesses that have stayed open?

I meant the actual incident is trivial..the legal expert on the link clearly states they have broke no rules but clearly this is up for debate.

1000s of people are dying because people cant just stay at home within their own bubble and therefore are creating additional opportunities for the virus to spread

wether that be pals out walking at reservoirs , people visiting family in houses, swingers having meets or whole households packing into the shops together when one parent could go on their own ... it all adds to the problem

stay at home as much as possible ... thats the message ... bugger the law its the responsible thing to do

have you heard her interview? she sounds smug entitled and loving the media attention around it to me ... hardly an essential trip for her mental health although that is just my opinion so i await the barrage of abuse for it

"

They may not inspire any empathy but the law should be applied without favour or discrimination.

From what I remember there was a few regional police forces that were extreme in their interpretation of the law. Derbyshire Constabulary used drone footage of a single walker on their twitter account in Locldown 1. Remember the easter eggs in cambridgeshire? Or the lady who got fined in Hull at the train station?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"Exercise up and down your stairs and if you are outside without a valid reason arrested and prison until lockdown is over."

Police state then? House arrest and shot on sight?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham

Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? "

Isn't that making an assumption?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby?

Isn't that making an assumption?"

Isn't driving five miles to a beauty spot with coffees,making an assumption,that you'll get away with it,when the rules say,stay home

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby?

Isn't that making an assumption?"

riot van on snake pass today and a lot of police also drone unit up on cat and fiddle yesterday.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hatawasteMan  over a year ago

stafford


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day.

What someone going for a walk?

But packed schools and shops are fine?

Neither.

There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules.

If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules.

But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang.

You vill have no rights left vatsover "

Hmm put it this way .. you wont give a toss about your rights if you are brown bread will you ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby?

Isn't that making an assumption?"

Thats why the question mark is there.

Most forces are adopting the 4Es approach, with a fine being the last of them.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *izandpaulCouple  over a year ago

merseyside

Just need clarification. We drove to the beach today, it's about 2-3 miles.

Is that ok. If not, tell me.

Would have no problem if the rules stated no driving to any exercise place, just exercise from your home. Easy to understand, no way it can be misinterpreted.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ockosaurusMan  over a year ago

Warwick


"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise.

If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining.

Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined."

A walk is classed as excercise (the government even said so) and you are allowed to meet one person for excercise.

So a social walk with one person 'is' acceptable as long as you are not breaking other regulations.

I haven't seen the details, but this seems heavy handed and is likely going to get reversed.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ockosaurusMan  over a year ago

Warwick

Personally I'd prefer them to have stayed home, but if what they are doing isn't breaking the rules (which I believe it isn't), then they should not be fined.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oldswarriorMan  over a year ago

Falkirk


"The police are loving this, you try reporting a terrorist bomber or someone breaking into your car or home and they are too busy playing with their cocks !

However break the COVID rules and it’s all out war on the public, thank god they aren’t armed because they’d be shooting people for buying a non-essential item if you let them.

What a load of crap. Of course it’s the polices fault that people still do as they choose without a care .

I rang the police yesterday to report some kids graffitiing a local landmark and they were there in under 5 minutes "

Yet you are in Lincoln where the crime statistics are comparatively low.

The police are well manned in that particular area, so response times should be adequate.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I had same problem with Derbyshire police today . 3 miles to park drove there alone with dog told not local go home or be fined . Told stay exercise in local area I live city center ffs . But I allowed to go supermarkets which are busier and closest one is further than the park Derbyshire police gone way over top

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? "

And maybe you have no evidence of that in the slightest?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *i1971Man  over a year ago

Cornwall

If I'm out either for work or a necessary purchase in the car, I might as well walk where I know that I'll be walking alone and no other person anywhere close (either due to the location or time I go there).

Alternatively I could walk from home on the pavement passing people all the time I'm out.

In disease transmission tend I know which one in safer doing.

Where I'm sure most transmission has come from locally was mixing around Christmas. Some homes around here had stay streams of vehicles going to & fro every day, including fairly large gatherings for their family/friends.

Socially distanced walks wherever they're taken isn't going to assist transmission.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby?

And maybe you have no evidence of that in the slightest?"

So why were they fined, and others weren't?

A fine is the last resort in the process.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ooo wet tight hornyWoman  over a year ago

lancashire


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

"

I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham

Derbyshire police have said that travel purposes for exercise, is against the spirit of the lockdown.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby?

And maybe you have no evidence of that in the slightest?

So why were they fined, and others weren't?

A fine is the last resort in the process. "

I don't know...if they did surely the police would have confirmed this.

Or they would have been charged or cautioned?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!!"

Its how you define local.

You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby?

Isn't that making an assumption?

Isn't driving five miles to a beauty spot with coffees,making an assumption,that you'll get away with it,when the rules say,stay home "

What assumption did I make?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better.

Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours.

That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong?

Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial.

Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day.

What someone going for a walk?

But packed schools and shops are fine?

Neither.

There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules.

If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules.

But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang.

You vill have no rights left vatsover

Hmm put it this way .. you wont give a toss about your rights if you are brown bread will you ?

"

Catch me if you can.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ooo wet tight hornyWoman  over a year ago

lancashire


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!!

Its how you define local.

You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton."

Again Boris makes things soooo clear...NOT

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby?

Isn't that making an assumption?

Thats why the question mark is there.

Most forces are adopting the 4Es approach, with a fine being the last of them. "

There's 2 question Mark's.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman  over a year ago

On a mooch


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!!

Its how you define local.

You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton."

It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tace 309TV/TS  over a year ago

durham

Seeing as there is no time limit set this time around to the amount of exercise you can do in any one day. Those two people could of walked the 5 miles instead of driving there. So what is the difference. I've seen groups of teenagers some 15 or more hanging around up this, way and no police to be seen anywhere. It looks like once again the motorist is the easiest target

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Exercise up and down your stairs and if you are outside without a valid reason arrested and prison until lockdown is over.

Police state then? House arrest and shot on sight? "

Only shoot on a friday, saturday and sunday.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots.

It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby?

And maybe you have no evidence of that in the slightest?

So why were they fined, and others weren't?

A fine is the last resort in the process.

I don't know...if they did surely the police would have confirmed this.

Or they would have been charged or cautioned?"

It appears that one woman actually travelled 9 miles to be there. If Derbyshire police aren't following the 4Es, as thet have claimed in press statements this week, then they do risk losing public support.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!!

Its how you define local.

You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton.

It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means "

That's not that clear though. It's just some like it to fit to their definition

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Instead of blaming the two women or the police blame the real problem ... Boris and this Government.

If they had said you cannot travel more than 5 miles from your home unless its for work, food shopping or to a medical practice it would have been loud and clear.

As it is i can as a single person have contact with one other single person and i could travel 50 miles or more to visit them as long as i have no contact with others on the way.

The rules and guidance are a shambles and thats down to the government.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *pursChick aka ShortieWoman  over a year ago

On a mooch


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!!

Its how you define local.

You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton.

It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means

That's not that clear though. It's just some like it to fit to their definition "

What is not clear about you must stay local, this means not leaving your village, town, area of city without a reasonable reason ?

Driving 5 miles, picking up coffee on the way, leaving your county just to walk, in my opinion, is not a valid reason

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *adame 2SwordsWoman  over a year ago

Victoria, London

I'm going to defend the police. They have an impossible task on their hands, and all WE are being asked to do is stay at home, watch telly and scoff food. Exercise or not, at times they will have to make examples of people, just to keep us alert if nothing else.

We're all paying the price for those who socialised over the last month and we just have to accept that one day, costs us maybe 6 weeks of restrictions, and instead of trying to fight the system and just knuckle down, otherwise we'll end up in this eternal cycle for the whole of 2021.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Next thing will be you can only shop at your nearest supermarket.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"Instead of blaming the two women or the police blame the real problem ... Boris and this Government.

If they had said you cannot travel more than 5 miles from your home unless its for work, food shopping or to a medical practice it would have been loud and clear.

As it is i can as a single person have contact with one other single person and i could travel 50 miles or more to visit them as long as i have no contact with others on the way.

The rules and guidance are a shambles and thats down to the government."

And the thing about hot drinks is farcical.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!!

Its how you define local.

You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton.

It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means

That's not that clear though. It's just some like it to fit to their definition

What is not clear about you must stay local, this means not leaving your village, town, area of city without a reasonable reason ?

Driving 5 miles, picking up coffee on the way, leaving your county just to walk, in my opinion, is not a valid reason "

Ah so, in my village, the post office/shop closed 2 years ago. The butcher retired about 5 years ago. The only retail premises is the pub and guess what, it's closed. So, if the villagers and me can't leave our village, what do we do? Starve?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ensual massagerMan  over a year ago

Bolton


"Instead of blaming the two women or the police blame the real problem ... Boris and this Government.

If they had said you cannot travel more than 5 miles from your home unless its for work, food shopping or to a medical practice it would have been loud and clear.

As it is i can as a single person have contact with one other single person and i could travel 50 miles or more to visit them as long as i have no contact with others on the way.

The rules and guidance are a shambles and thats down to the government.

And the thing about hot drinks is farcical."

Oops, not allowed a hot drink?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I’m a bit worried about going out on my mountain bike in case the police think i am of to somewhere with a few peaks.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *rincess PhoenixWoman  over a year ago

Southampton

They travelled out of county that's hardly staying local!

Plus as is so often the case we only know what the women who were fined are saying. They might not be telling the whole truth, they might've got gobby and aggressive towards the officer we don't know but then I guess that wouldn't fit into the media's anti police rhetoric

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"Instead of blaming the two women or the police blame the real problem ... Boris and this Government.

If they had said you cannot travel more than 5 miles from your home unless its for work, food shopping or to a medical practice it would have been loud and clear.

As it is i can as a single person have contact with one other single person and i could travel 50 miles or more to visit them as long as i have no contact with others on the way.

The rules and guidance are a shambles and thats down to the government.

And the thing about hot drinks is farcical.

Oops, not allowed a hot drink? "

Apparently not.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"They travelled out of county that's hardly staying local!

Plus as is so often the case we only know what the women who were fined are saying. They might not be telling the whole truth, they might've got gobby and aggressive towards the officer we don't know but then I guess that wouldn't fit into the media's anti police rhetoric "

If they would have got aggressive they would have been charged or cautioned.

What anti police rhetoric?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *rincess PhoenixWoman  over a year ago

Southampton


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!!

Its how you define local.

You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton.

It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means

That's not that clear though. It's just some like it to fit to their definition

What is not clear about you must stay local, this means not leaving your village, town, area of city without a reasonable reason ?

Driving 5 miles, picking up coffee on the way, leaving your county just to walk, in my opinion, is not a valid reason

Ah so, in my village, the post office/shop closed 2 years ago. The butcher retired about 5 years ago. The only retail premises is the pub and guess what, it's closed. So, if the villagers and me can't leave our village, what do we do? Starve? "

Going to a shop for food is an essential journey!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Not heavy handed. No.

Self accountability... over a year now. Stay home not hard is it?

They drove miles... could have had an accident put the emergency service at risk.

Both went to get coffee? Takeaway! Essential. No.

Yes you can exercise with someone but really?

If everyone does this there oudh really a lockdown is there? Everyone behaves like children going to the extreme within the rules.

Just start at fucking home. Get stuff delivered... maybe go for shopping once a week or two weeks on your own. And fucking go for a run outside your house.

If be giving livid in my nan died because sone smart arsenal family member has to go meet their friend from the other side of town to exercise in a park miles away and but need to pop in for a coffee for good measure. Because "they can within the rules"

Say it with me STAY FUCKING HOME

PROTECT THE NHS

SAVE LIVES. Note: is isn't go Costa meet your friend have a run... make it miles away from home.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Not heavy handed. No.

Self accountability... over a year now. Stay home not hard is it?

They drove miles... could have had an accident put the emergency service at risk.

Both went to get coffee? Takeaway! Essential. No.

Yes you can exercise with someone but really?

If everyone does this there oudh really a lockdown is there? Everyone behaves like children going to the extreme within the rules.

Just start at fucking home. Get stuff delivered... maybe go for shopping once a week or two weeks on your own. And fucking go for a run outside your house.

If be giving livid in my nan died because sone smart arsenal family member has to go meet their friend from the other side of town to exercise in a park miles away and but need to pop in for a coffee for good measure. Because "they can within the rules"

Say it with me STAY FUCKING HOME

PROTECT THE NHS

SAVE LIVES. Note: is isn't go Costa meet your friend have a run... make it miles away from home. "

Policeman with poor understanding of rules or on a power trip

Could have had an accident? Hypothetically they can have an accident in the home and put same emergency services at risk.

Assumption that both went - 1 person maybe bought both, maybe not essential but still within the “rules”

Don’t get your issue with the yes you can exercise with one person - again within the “rules”

Stay at home Get stuff delivered - NO all the delivery folk should be at home they might have an accident and put the emergency services at risk

Go for your shopping once a week - NO stay fucking home! You’ve had a year to prepare for this you should have everything you need at home, don’t want to risk having an accident and risking others lives do you

Yes I’m being arsey but none of this is a simple black or white situation so neither are the “rules”

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Obviously some people here think that all villages, towns, etc are in the middle of counties.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lansmanMan  over a year ago

Sheffield


"I’m a bit worried about going out on my mountain bike in case the police think i am of to somewhere with a few peaks. "

Likewise. Im not really warmed up till 5 miles out ... how far can i cycle ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Police definately at fault. They appeared to be making up their own rules. I think the ladies should report them to the police complaints authority. I'm all for police tacking raves and other large party gatherings but these ladies had clearly indentified a safe place to exercise where they were unlikely to encounter other people and were careful about travelling separately and social distancing. I don't know the area concerned but 5 miles is not a long way from home to seek a suitable exercise as spot. About a 15 min journey? I drive to a large Park to walk as I can easily avoid other people out exercising by moving away from them which I can't go outside my home on the pavement. I did walk around the block initially but was constantly having to walk into the road to avoid other pedestrians which was obviously not safe.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *agneto.Man  over a year ago

Bham


"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them.

The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic.

Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just?

"

Finally some order being enforced...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

  

By *elshcouple18Couple  over a year ago

Cardiff


"I'm going to defend the police. They have an impossible task on their hands, and all WE are being asked to do is stay at home, watch telly and scoff food. Exercise or not, at times they will have to make examples of people, just to keep us alert if nothing else.

We're all paying the price for those who socialised over the last month and we just have to accept that one day, costs us maybe 6 weeks of restrictions, and instead of trying to fight the system and just knuckle down, otherwise we'll end up in this eternal cycle for the whole of 2021.

"

someone with a bit of sense..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

0.4062

0.0156