FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Police
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? " Just saw that. Well over the top | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've not seen the fuller details but it would seem prudent to take hot drinks with you, in very cold weather. Many types of exercise also benefit from swift consumption of nutrition, whether solid or in liquid form. If these people were legally entitled to exercise in the way they were, then this falls to the definition of a 'picnic'. If picnics are inappropriately defined in the law, then it needs resolution. If it's a poor interpretation of this definition, then it needs action to clarify that and to prevent future misapplication of the law. It would seem appropriate for this charge to be dropped against those who have had it levied. There were reports of people being charged for sitting down, during intermittent exercise bursts last year and that later being accepted as an approved measure, I think. Even if sat at a public picnic table, whilst consuming hot drinks, it would not reasonably be classed as a pucnic. " According to Priti Patel, officers could now fine people found sitting on public benches | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined." Shame on them for wanting to see a friend.... Police state coming | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined." What is local? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined. What is local?" As per the government site If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined." When you have sloppy legislation then it's open to interpretation by Police and others, there is no legally defined limit of what constitutes local so whilst 50 mile would be excessive 5 is not ... Common sense needs to be applied, and by the comments made about a drink being a picnic it's clearly lacking in the officer who came out with such bollocks.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined. What is local? As per the government site If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough " Cant see what they have done wrong tbh and the legal fella seems to agree. Seems unnecessarily heavy handed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined. What is local? As per the government site If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough " Which as you know in some boroughs is a lot more than others, Chelsea and Westminster as opposed to Greenwich or Croydon is much different.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements " GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is local?" There is guidance on the gov website, pretty much says your village or your part of town. We would define it as setting off on foot or by bike from your own house. We have a nature reserve a few miles away, we sometimes walk or cycle there from our house. We never drive there as we are too tight to pay for parking. Before the latest lockdown it never ceased to amaze us how many people drove there, paid for parking, and then had "exercise" walking from their car to the chip van at the end of the car park. 300m from the car park the crowds thinned out. Since the lockdown we have walked 2 miles every day in a circle from our house. Very boring, on the road etc. but it is exercise. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is local? There is guidance on the gov website, pretty much says your village or your part of town. We would define it as setting off on foot or by bike from your own house. We have a nature reserve a few miles away, we sometimes walk or cycle there from our house. We never drive there as we are too tight to pay for parking. Before the latest lockdown it never ceased to amaze us how many people drove there, paid for parking, and then had "exercise" walking from their car to the chip van at the end of the car park. 300m from the car park the crowds thinned out. Since the lockdown we have walked 2 miles every day in a circle from our house. Very boring, on the road etc. but it is exercise." But it's going to vary depending on where you live isnt it? Like I said,just seems well over the top. Hope they fight it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous... " Germany in the 1930s comes to mind | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it's going to vary depending on where you live isnt it?" No, pretty much everyone can walk from their house to get exercise. It may not be scenic or even particularly pleasant but it fulfills the requirement for exercise. Our daily walk is neither scenic or pleasant but it is necessary. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? " Think the main issue was driving out of county, they were stopped in Derbyshire, but lived in Leicestershire. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous... Germany in the 1930s comes to mind" Really?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? " Wasn't this Derbyshire constabulary? They have a history of this idiocy. It will be thrown out of court. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 mile radius of where they were is only very small villages , and there are numerous parks and places in the area. I’m guessing the 5 miles is not true. Would be interested to see where they did in fact live. There’s also a picture of them both smiling holding their coffees in hand so can’t have been to distraught. They also said when they arrived there that there was police vehicles already in the car park , so guessing that loads of people have been visiting there and police were cracking down on everyone. " Maybe the picture wasnt taken straight after it happened ? Like the poster says above.. in the scheme of things it very insignificant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous... Germany in the 1930s comes to mind Really??" Yes, let's await for tier nein | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well people are shouting for a police state so this is just the start. Let's see how many ridiculous situations come to light before people understand that they're volunteering for the police to control our movements GMB this morning debated whether members of the public should be rewarded for snitching on their neighbours. The clamour for this is nothing short of incredulous... Germany in the 1930s comes to mind Really?? Yes, let's await for tier nein " That'd be all reich | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So as regular walkers which we intend to do this weekend are we liable to be fined if we take a pack up and a flask of hot soup?" Possibly if some police person decides it's a picnic not exercise... There's a video going around on twitter showing a guy who politely confronted a group of police all sitting around having a coffee in a cafe somewhere. His question was why are they allowed to do it when ordinary people aren't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A warning would have been more appropriate I reckon." Yep I agree,bit over the top where a warning might have been suffice. Having said that,why drive 5 miles to exercise?if they live apart,why not walk n meet half way? What's with the hot drinks to exercise? Had they been warned before? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Always ones to offer a different view regardless of the argument.. In our opinion should they be fined.. no.. we're sure a little advice and sending them on their way would suffice.. However... We don't know if they were offered advice and decided to argue against this resulting in enforcement. We do know that the latest guidance / rules states :- "You must not leave, or be outside of your home except where necessary" Was it really necessary to go to starbucks together, then drive to an area 5 miles from your home to meet up together to go for a walk.. We'd argue not. We also know :- "Exercise with your household (or support bubble) or one other person, this should be limited to once per day, and you should not travel outside your local area." So in this context they went for exercise with one other person, but is crossing the boundaries of your village / town to exercise outside of your "local area" Well we'd argue it is, what's wrong with walking from your door step and remaining local. The guidance also states "If you do leave home for a permitted reason, you should always stay local - unless it is necessary to go further, for example to go to work. Stay local means stay in the village, town, or part of the city where you live." It clearly states where to stay, not to travel to starbucks then take another journey 5 miles away crossing a boundary to go for a walk.. In our opinion it's just two people breaking the guidance and whining about it. Was it over the top to fine them, perhaps, however we don't have the full context so a balanced view is hard to reach. All we know is we've not be fined, but we're not driving to starbucks to get a drink to drive 5 miles from our house for a walk.. we leave our house, walk locally and come home. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The police service droids have overreacted from the get go. There is no law that says that you have to wear a mask. There is no official exemption certificate. Even the governments own website states, that there is no reason to account for yourself. None of the regulations are actually in the coronavirus legislation. So they are as far as i understand subordinate to the act. Government advice is not law. The police can turn up mob handed by the dozens but cant attend a burglary. There are plenty of websites showing the gross over reaction of the police. The law i believe is ultra vires. Which is a legitimate defence in court. If someone is brave enough to take this to its ultimate conclusion then the supreme Court judges the police acted ultra viresly then every arrest and fine would be deemed unlawful. Every fine and arrest would be open for compensation and civil action could be taken against the police for wrongful arrest. What would make this all unlawful, is for the sole purpose of protecting the nhs. The mass incarceration of the nation and defacto removal of the rights of the population. To protect a single government organisation must be at some point unlawful My son is a covid nurse. Covid is real but the authorities response verges on the police state" Police have always attended any burglary I’ve reported. Hate seeing this used in every argument against the police. They are set their tasks like everyone else. If there wasn’t so many idiots about doing what they wanted regardless then these two people would probably not have a story to tell. That redo our is obviously a hotspot for people flouncing the law. No One needs to take the police to court to fight them. Just bloody behave . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The police are loving this, you try reporting a terrorist bomber or someone breaking into your car or home and they are too busy playing with their cocks ! However break the COVID rules and it’s all out war on the public, thank god they aren’t armed because they’d be shooting people for buying a non-essential item if you let them. " What a load of crap. Of course it’s the polices fault that people still do as they choose without a care . I rang the police yesterday to report some kids graffitiing a local landmark and they were there in under 5 minutes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think Derbyshire police can't win. Local residents complain about the number of people travelling to their area and when the police are not rescuing visitors stuck in their cars, in snow, and proactively trying to stop visitors getting into difficulty, they are slated for handing out fines " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The fine is justified on the grounds of taking two cars on a 10 mile round trip without good reason. Whatever happened to the clean air experienced during the first lockdown?" i should imagine its got something to do with it being sunny and warm the first lock down and below freezing this time round.myself im still on the bike you warm up within ten mins | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The fine is justified on the grounds of taking two cars on a 10 mile round trip without good reason. Whatever happened to the clean air experienced during the first lockdown? i should imagine its got something to do with it being sunny and warm the first lock down and below freezing this time round.myself im still on the bike you warm up within ten mins" Yes me to even at 3 15 in morn when I leave for work ! When I get there people say did u cycle ? I say I allways do I dont drive lol! It was icy this morn x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The police are loving this, you try reporting a terrorist bomber or someone breaking into your car or home and they are too busy playing with their cocks ! However break the COVID rules and it’s all out war on the public, thank god they aren’t armed because they’d be shooting people for buying a non-essential item if you let them. What a load of crap. Of course it’s the polices fault that people still do as they choose without a care . I rang the police yesterday to report some kids graffitiing a local landmark and they were there in under 5 minutes " You must live in a quiet place then, because our youngest daughter who lives in Manchester was in bed one Sunday morning (after working a night shift) when an intruder broke into her bedroom after ransacking her flat, he could have assaulted or killed her but luckily he just ran off. We poke to Greater Manchester Police after they refused to come out to the incident, their attitude was they were far too too busy and gave my daughter a crime number. Disgraceful to say the least ! We put an official complaint in writing and the reply that came back almost blamed my daughter for living where she did. The police need to start and remember it’s our taxes that pay to keep them in a job, there’s no gold shower of money from heaven to do that ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The police are loving this, you try reporting a terrorist bomber or someone breaking into your car or home and they are too busy playing with their cocks ! However break the COVID rules and it’s all out war on the public, thank god they aren’t armed because they’d be shooting people for buying a non-essential item if you let them. What a load of crap. Of course it’s the polices fault that people still do as they choose without a care . I rang the police yesterday to report some kids graffitiing a local landmark and they were there in under 5 minutes You must live in a quiet place then, because our youngest daughter who lives in Manchester was in bed one Sunday morning (after working a night shift) when an intruder broke into her bedroom after ransacking her flat, he could have assaulted or killed her but luckily he just ran off. We poke to Greater Manchester Police after they refused to come out to the incident, their attitude was they were far too too busy and gave my daughter a crime number. Disgraceful to say the least ! We put an official complaint in writing and the reply that came back almost blamed my daughter for living where she did. The police need to start and remember it’s our taxes that pay to keep them in a job, there’s no gold shower of money from heaven to do that !" Shocking that. Werent they supposed to be hiring more plod? We had to go to a station a while ago..it was 8 at night and we visited 4 until we found one that was open. They must be cut to the bone. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined." Absolutely | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined. Absolutely" What's the difference between taking a walk and a social wander? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What do people really expect when they’re blinding following “rules” and believing all the propaganda they hear? You wanted state control, here it is. " You ran out of tinfoil mate? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined. What is local? As per the government site If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough Cant see what they have done wrong tbh and the legal fella seems to agree. Seems unnecessarily heavy handed " The exercise they are doing, walking, can be done straight from your front door, you don’t need to get in your car, grab a takeaway tea and drive five miles to then have a walk | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined. When you have sloppy legislation then it's open to interpretation by Police and others, there is no legally defined limit of what constitutes local so whilst 50 mile would be excessive 5 is not ... Common sense needs to be applied, and by the comments made about a drink being a picnic it's clearly lacking in the officer who came out with such bollocks.. " is the 5 mile limit only in scotland then? we definitely have a defined 5 miles | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined. What is local? As per the government site If you need to travel you should stay local – meaning avoiding travelling outside of your village, town or the part of a city where you live So for me in London that means I can’t leave my borough Which as you know in some boroughs is a lot more than others, Chelsea and Westminster as opposed to Greenwich or Croydon is much different.." Oh totally, some boroughs are huge and some aren’t. I live in a large borough, but I can’t get to the other side of it unless I wanted to walk for 2 hours plus or use public transport. I’ve literally stuck to my 2 sq mile neighbourhood when in T3/T4/lockdown | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined. Absolutely What's the difference between taking a walk and a social wander?" The guidance says you can meet one other person for exercise but then also says this Meeting other people It is against the law to meet socially with family or friends unless they are part of your household or support bubble. You cannot leave home for recreational or leisure purposes (such as for a picnic or a social meeting). So to meet for a social wander is different to taking a walk for exercise | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What do people really expect when they’re blinding following “rules” and believing all the propaganda they hear? You wanted state control, here it is. " I don't want state control. I just want an end to the pandemic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Always ones to offer a different view regardless of the argument.. In our opinion should they be fined.. no.. we're sure a little advice and sending them on their way would suffice.. However... We don't know if they were offered advice and decided to argue against this resulting in enforcement. We do know that the latest guidance / rules states :- "You must not leave, or be outside of your home except where necessary" Was it really necessary to go to starbucks together, then drive to an area 5 miles from your home to meet up together to go for a walk.. We'd argue not. We also know :- "Exercise with your household (or support bubble) or one other person, this should be limited to once per day, and you should not travel outside your local area." So in this context they went for exercise with one other person, but is crossing the boundaries of your village / town to exercise outside of your "local area" Well we'd argue it is, what's wrong with walking from your door step and remaining local. The guidance also states "If you do leave home for a permitted reason, you should always stay local - unless it is necessary to go further, for example to go to work. Stay local means stay in the village, town, or part of the city where you live." It clearly states where to stay, not to travel to starbucks then take another journey 5 miles away crossing a boundary to go for a walk.. In our opinion it's just two people breaking the guidance and whining about it. Was it over the top to fine them, perhaps, however we don't have the full context so a balanced view is hard to reach. All we know is we've not be fined, but we're not driving to starbucks to get a drink to drive 5 miles from our house for a walk.. we leave our house, walk locally and come home. " 2 sides to everything in the grand scheme of things yes maybe heavy handed but a warning wouldn’t likely have made the news and possibly they (rightly or wrongly) have been made an example of to demonstrate that enforcements are actually now happening... after all ho many threads and comments have we seen along the lines of no point having laws if you don’t enforce them as people will just disregard them the likelihood of them paying it is low but the message that the police are getting tougher on what they believe to be people flouting the rules is now out there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? " I think the police probably have a ridiculously hard job currently, having viewed the response of the woman who filmed the Glostershire hospital when she was arrested you can imagine a scenario where they where quite entitled, rude, offensive etc when questioned. I wasn’t there, I’m not going to judge the girls or indeed the police, it will be looked at properly in due course I’m sure. X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" is the 5 mile limit only in scotland then? we definitely have a defined 5 miles " In England there are currently restrictions on inter county travel. They were in Derbyshire and the article claims one of them lives in Ashby de la Zouch which is in Leicestershire, I suspect this is the real reason they were fined. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Totally over the top yes! X" would it be over the top if one was covid positive, gave it to the other, then took it back home to their family? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Totally over the top yes! X would it be over the top if one was covid positive, gave it to the other, then took it back home to their family? " Yes because its the risk they take. It seems the government think we are no longer able to assess that on our own | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined." No law to say what local actually means. 5 miles is hardly travelling out of town is it. Some peoples nearest countryside is that far or more. Country has gone crackers. Ok for them to pile into Tesco with 200 other people though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Totally over the top yes! X would it be over the top if one was covid positive, gave it to the other, then took it back home to their family? " Soooooo in supermarket mixing with god knows how many????? X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Welsh rules - There are no limits on the distance you can travel during exercise, though the nearer you stay to your home, the better. Your exercise should start and finish from your home and you should exercise alone or with a member of your household or support bubble Basically don’t drive to a place of excercise..." i see we are roughly 10 miles from eachother, so if we both walk 5 miles, we could meet within the rules, as long as we social distance, Think not!!! That's where there's lack of clarity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The questions we would like answering is what where the police doing in such numbers in a remote location ? Skiving off and worried about being caught ? Also what rules where they observing for social distancing when using enclosed vehicles to travel from the station to that location ? The reporting seems wrong as well. The corona laws are for gatherings. The guidance on staying home, social distancing and keeping to your local area etc are not laws and not enforceable. Unless the persons left there local area which is in a high tier group to enter another area of a lower tier. Plus as there is no set definition or distance for local area within UK law. This would be assessed as possibly be your parish, Town or local council/authority area. " Police rules have changed since Wednesday I think . They now have the power to fine you . The police were there because there was most likely lots of people going there for the same reason these two were . They would have fined anyone that couldn’t prove they were local. And if highlighting these two stops others from risking it then I’m all for it . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? " The same force that used drones to try and shame families out walking in the Peak District in the summer isn’t it? Doesn’t surprise me. Massively ott | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better." Apparently you can travel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. " but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? " I've read this story and apparently the police were waiting in some numbers for people to turn up at a local reservoir.. as in several police vehicles.. so they were waiting to catch people. I think they are being very heavy handed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In England you can travel to exercise currently and meet one person from outside of your home or bubble." That is true but not outside of your local area. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Always ones to offer a different view regardless of the argument.. In our opinion should they be fined.. no.. we're sure a little advice and sending them on their way would suffice.. However... We don't know if they were offered advice and decided to argue against this resulting in enforcement. We do know that the latest guidance / rules states :- "You must not leave, or be outside of your home except where necessary" Was it really necessary to go to starbucks together, then drive to an area 5 miles from your home to meet up together to go for a walk.. We'd argue not. We also know :- "Exercise with your household (or support bubble) or one other person, this should be limited to once per day, and you should not travel outside your local area." So in this context they went for exercise with one other person, but is crossing the boundaries of your village / town to exercise outside of your "local area" Well we'd argue it is, what's wrong with walking from your door step and remaining local. The guidance also states "If you do leave home for a permitted reason, you should always stay local - unless it is necessary to go further, for example to go to work. Stay local means stay in the village, town, or part of the city where you live." It clearly states where to stay, not to travel to starbucks then take another journey 5 miles away crossing a boundary to go for a walk.. In our opinion it's just two people breaking the guidance and whining about it. Was it over the top to fine them, perhaps, however we don't have the full context so a balanced view is hard to reach. All we know is we've not be fined, but we're not driving to starbucks to get a drink to drive 5 miles from our house for a walk.. we leave our house, walk locally and come home. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wonder what the real context is....." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. " That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pity the police aren’t as on the ball with drug dealers and grooming gangs. " They aren't such easy targets. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial." Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day. " What someone going for a walk? But packed schools and shops are fine? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day. What someone going for a walk? But packed schools and shops are fine?" Neither. There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules. If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules. But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial." what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day. What someone going for a walk? But packed schools and shops are fine? Neither. There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules. If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules. But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang." 100% agree ... people want to follow the letter also means there are loopholes when principals based approach of what are we trying to achieve here seems much better way to look at it unfortunately the law has to work on the letter of and not the principal so we will always have places it doesn’t quite fit or seem to make sense but thats why we have judges to set precedent and interpret the law | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other " 1000s of people are dying because people are going out for walks? And not because of schools or shops or most places of businesses that have stayed open? I meant the actual incident is trivial..the legal expert on the link clearly states they have broke no rules but clearly this is up for debate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other 1000s of people are dying because people are going out for walks? And not because of schools or shops or most places of businesses that have stayed open? I meant the actual incident is trivial..the legal expert on the link clearly states they have broke no rules but clearly this is up for debate. " After reading up on what the expert writes, he seems intent on providing people with loopholes to flout the coronavirus guidelines. And has been doing so since March. His Twitter feed is him arguing with other experts that have a different take on the guidelines . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? " Sounds it but there attitude may have been the problem we do not know this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The police service droids have overreacted from the get go. There is no law that says that you have to wear a mask. There is no official exemption certificate. Even the governments own website states, that there is no reason to account for yourself. None of the regulations are actually in the coronavirus legislation. So they are as far as i understand subordinate to the act. Government advice is not law. The police can turn up mob handed by the dozens but cant attend a burglary. There are plenty of websites showing the gross over reaction of the police. The law i believe is ultra vires. Which is a legitimate defence in court. If someone is brave enough to take this to its ultimate conclusion then the supreme Court judges the police acted ultra viresly then every arrest and fine would be deemed unlawful. Every fine and arrest would be open for compensation and civil action could be taken against the police for wrongful arrest. What would make this all unlawful, is for the sole purpose of protecting the nhs. The mass incarceration of the nation and defacto removal of the rights of the population. To protect a single government organisation must be at some point unlawful My son is a covid nurse. Covid is real but the authorities response verges on the police state" Absolutely superb but as I've been saying for months, there's hundreds and hundreds on this site alone running and begging for a police state | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The police service droids have overreacted from the get go. There is no law that says that you have to wear a mask. There is no official exemption certificate. Even the governments own website states, that there is no reason to account for yourself. None of the regulations are actually in the coronavirus legislation. So they are as far as i understand subordinate to the act. Government advice is not law. The police can turn up mob handed by the dozens but cant attend a burglary. There are plenty of websites showing the gross over reaction of the police. The law i believe is ultra vires. Which is a legitimate defence in court. If someone is brave enough to take this to its ultimate conclusion then the supreme Court judges the police acted ultra viresly then every arrest and fine would be deemed unlawful. Every fine and arrest would be open for compensation and civil action could be taken against the police for wrongful arrest. What would make this all unlawful, is for the sole purpose of protecting the nhs. The mass incarceration of the nation and defacto removal of the rights of the population. To protect a single government organisation must be at some point unlawful My son is a covid nurse. Covid is real but the authorities response verges on the police state Police have always attended any burglary I’ve reported. Hate seeing this used in every argument against the police. They are set their tasks like everyone else. If there wasn’t so many idiots about doing what they wanted regardless then these two people would probably not have a story to tell. That redo our is obviously a hotspot for people flouncing the law. No One needs to take the police to court to fight them. Just bloody behave . " Perhaps living in Greater Manchester you might be different.. Over 80,000 crimes shoved under the carpet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The advice is stay at home you do not need to drive 5 miles to take a walk." Does it actually say 5 miles? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What do people really expect when they’re blinding following “rules” and believing all the propaganda they hear? You wanted state control, here it is. " Yep, absolutely. People have been begging for it and now it's started.. Will they relinquish this power? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other 1000s of people are dying because people are going out for walks? And not because of schools or shops or most places of businesses that have stayed open? I meant the actual incident is trivial..the legal expert on the link clearly states they have broke no rules but clearly this is up for debate. " 1000s of people are dying because people cant just stay at home within their own bubble and therefore are creating additional opportunities for the virus to spread wether that be pals out walking at reservoirs , people visiting family in houses, swingers having meets or whole households packing into the shops together when one parent could go on their own ... it all adds to the problem stay at home as much as possible ... thats the message ... bugger the law its the responsible thing to do have you heard her interview? she sounds smug entitled and loving the media attention around it to me ... hardly an essential trip for her mental health although that is just my opinion so i await the barrage of abuse for it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be fair I can see Both sides,Ashby is a very beautiful place and plenty of places to go for a walk out of the way of everyone else and they did cross into another county but giving them a telling off for having a warm drink with them takes the piss a little," Isn't it better, especially in the winter, to take a warm/hot drink with you rather than calling into a cafe for a take away and possibly coming into contact with someone? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better." That's old hat now. So last year. However, you're closer to a police state than England.. Remember, we don't have an assembly.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined. Shame on them for wanting to see a friend.... Police state coming " Coming? It’s here! At least they didn’t have snowballs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be fair I can see Both sides,Ashby is a very beautiful place and plenty of places to go for a walk out of the way of everyone else and they did cross into another county but giving them a telling off for having a warm drink with them takes the piss a little, Isn't it better, especially in the winter, to take a warm/hot drink with you rather than calling into a cafe for a take away and possibly coming into contact with someone? " You missed the point they were carrying takeaway drinks then from a well known supplier then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day. What someone going for a walk? But packed schools and shops are fine? Neither. There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules. If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules. But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang." You vill have no rights left vatsover | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. what this fails to take into account is those 1000 people are dying because people are all out and about when they should be in home, not in spite of it... so the message isnt this is trivial the message is this is serious also police and nhs don’t use the same resource so in that respect its not focus on one or the other 1000s of people are dying because people are going out for walks? And not because of schools or shops or most places of businesses that have stayed open? I meant the actual incident is trivial..the legal expert on the link clearly states they have broke no rules but clearly this is up for debate. 1000s of people are dying because people cant just stay at home within their own bubble and therefore are creating additional opportunities for the virus to spread wether that be pals out walking at reservoirs , people visiting family in houses, swingers having meets or whole households packing into the shops together when one parent could go on their own ... it all adds to the problem stay at home as much as possible ... thats the message ... bugger the law its the responsible thing to do have you heard her interview? she sounds smug entitled and loving the media attention around it to me ... hardly an essential trip for her mental health although that is just my opinion so i await the barrage of abuse for it " They may not inspire any empathy but the law should be applied without favour or discrimination. From what I remember there was a few regional police forces that were extreme in their interpretation of the law. Derbyshire Constabulary used drone footage of a single walker on their twitter account in Locldown 1. Remember the easter eggs in cambridgeshire? Or the lady who got fined in Hull at the train station? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Exercise up and down your stairs and if you are outside without a valid reason arrested and prison until lockdown is over." Police state then? House arrest and shot on sight? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? " Isn't that making an assumption? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? Isn't that making an assumption?" Isn't driving five miles to a beauty spot with coffees,making an assumption,that you'll get away with it,when the rules say,stay home | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? Isn't that making an assumption?" riot van on snake pass today and a lot of police also drone unit up on cat and fiddle yesterday. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day. What someone going for a walk? But packed schools and shops are fine? Neither. There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules. If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules. But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang. You vill have no rights left vatsover " Hmm put it this way .. you wont give a toss about your rights if you are brown bread will you ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? Isn't that making an assumption?" Thats why the question mark is there. Most forces are adopting the 4Es approach, with a fine being the last of them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"5 miles from home is not local. It is rarely necessary to drive to exercise. If they regularly walked or cycled 10 miles a day and the reservoir was on their route then they are justified in complaining. Their exercise looked more like a social wander drinking a takeaway coffee so they were, quite correctly, fined." A walk is classed as excercise (the government even said so) and you are allowed to meet one person for excercise. So a social walk with one person 'is' acceptable as long as you are not breaking other regulations. I haven't seen the details, but this seems heavy handed and is likely going to get reversed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The police are loving this, you try reporting a terrorist bomber or someone breaking into your car or home and they are too busy playing with their cocks ! However break the COVID rules and it’s all out war on the public, thank god they aren’t armed because they’d be shooting people for buying a non-essential item if you let them. What a load of crap. Of course it’s the polices fault that people still do as they choose without a care . I rang the police yesterday to report some kids graffitiing a local landmark and they were there in under 5 minutes " Yet you are in Lincoln where the crime statistics are comparatively low. The police are well manned in that particular area, so response times should be adequate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? " And maybe you have no evidence of that in the slightest? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? And maybe you have no evidence of that in the slightest?" So why were they fined, and others weren't? A fine is the last resort in the process. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? " I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? And maybe you have no evidence of that in the slightest? So why were they fined, and others weren't? A fine is the last resort in the process. " I don't know...if they did surely the police would have confirmed this. Or they would have been charged or cautioned? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!!" Its how you define local. You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? Isn't that making an assumption? Isn't driving five miles to a beauty spot with coffees,making an assumption,that you'll get away with it,when the rules say,stay home " What assumption did I make? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m confused. In Wales we are not allowed to drive to take excercise. Is it different in England? If the rules are the same, then people should be fined. We all quote Cumings as a bad example, but this is no better. Apparently you can travel. but not for exercise, that must start and stop at your house. Luckily for us, we have woodland and beach within walking distance from ours. That legal expert on the link saying they have done nothing wrong? Considering over 1000 people are dying a day ,its seems ridiculously trivial. Well maybe we need something like this to stop over 1000 people dying a day. What someone going for a walk? But packed schools and shops are fine? Neither. There seems to be too much effort put into finding loopholes in "the rules" and not enough put into tring to achieve what the intention is behind the rules. If everyone had a decent sense of responsibility we wouldn't need rules. But hey ... we all have "rights", the consequences can go hang. You vill have no rights left vatsover Hmm put it this way .. you wont give a toss about your rights if you are brown bread will you ? " Catch me if you can. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!! Its how you define local. You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton." Again Boris makes things soooo clear...NOT | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? Isn't that making an assumption? Thats why the question mark is there. Most forces are adopting the 4Es approach, with a fine being the last of them. " There's 2 question Mark's. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!! Its how you define local. You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton." It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Exercise up and down your stairs and if you are outside without a valid reason arrested and prison until lockdown is over. Police state then? House arrest and shot on sight? " Only shoot on a friday, saturday and sunday. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Derbyshire police are targeting their beauty spots. It appears that most are turned away without a fine, so maybe these two women started getting gobby? And maybe you have no evidence of that in the slightest? So why were they fined, and others weren't? A fine is the last resort in the process. I don't know...if they did surely the police would have confirmed this. Or they would have been charged or cautioned?" It appears that one woman actually travelled 9 miles to be there. If Derbyshire police aren't following the 4Es, as thet have claimed in press statements this week, then they do risk losing public support. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!! Its how you define local. You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton. It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means " That's not that clear though. It's just some like it to fit to their definition | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!! Its how you define local. You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton. It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means That's not that clear though. It's just some like it to fit to their definition " What is not clear about you must stay local, this means not leaving your village, town, area of city without a reasonable reason ? Driving 5 miles, picking up coffee on the way, leaving your county just to walk, in my opinion, is not a valid reason | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of blaming the two women or the police blame the real problem ... Boris and this Government. If they had said you cannot travel more than 5 miles from your home unless its for work, food shopping or to a medical practice it would have been loud and clear. As it is i can as a single person have contact with one other single person and i could travel 50 miles or more to visit them as long as i have no contact with others on the way. The rules and guidance are a shambles and thats down to the government." And the thing about hot drinks is farcical. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!! Its how you define local. You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton. It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means That's not that clear though. It's just some like it to fit to their definition What is not clear about you must stay local, this means not leaving your village, town, area of city without a reasonable reason ? Driving 5 miles, picking up coffee on the way, leaving your county just to walk, in my opinion, is not a valid reason " Ah so, in my village, the post office/shop closed 2 years ago. The butcher retired about 5 years ago. The only retail premises is the pub and guess what, it's closed. So, if the villagers and me can't leave our village, what do we do? Starve? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of blaming the two women or the police blame the real problem ... Boris and this Government. If they had said you cannot travel more than 5 miles from your home unless its for work, food shopping or to a medical practice it would have been loud and clear. As it is i can as a single person have contact with one other single person and i could travel 50 miles or more to visit them as long as i have no contact with others on the way. The rules and guidance are a shambles and thats down to the government. And the thing about hot drinks is farcical." Oops, not allowed a hot drink? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Instead of blaming the two women or the police blame the real problem ... Boris and this Government. If they had said you cannot travel more than 5 miles from your home unless its for work, food shopping or to a medical practice it would have been loud and clear. As it is i can as a single person have contact with one other single person and i could travel 50 miles or more to visit them as long as i have no contact with others on the way. The rules and guidance are a shambles and thats down to the government. And the thing about hot drinks is farcical. Oops, not allowed a hot drink? " Apparently not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They travelled out of county that's hardly staying local! Plus as is so often the case we only know what the women who were fined are saying. They might not be telling the whole truth, they might've got gobby and aggressive towards the officer we don't know but then I guess that wouldn't fit into the media's anti police rhetoric " If they would have got aggressive they would have been charged or cautioned. What anti police rhetoric? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? I think driving 5 miles to exercise is not keeping it local...only absolutely necessary journeys to be taken...IE: school, medical, work...exercise only local so surely 5 miles is not local. If they where involved in a road traffic accident that's more pressure on the nhs and other 999 workers who would have to attend, so as petty as it seems these rules are set for a reason!! Its how you define local. You are allowed to travel.. but as I understand there is no specific defeniton. It’s been pointed out in the thread what local means That's not that clear though. It's just some like it to fit to their definition What is not clear about you must stay local, this means not leaving your village, town, area of city without a reasonable reason ? Driving 5 miles, picking up coffee on the way, leaving your county just to walk, in my opinion, is not a valid reason Ah so, in my village, the post office/shop closed 2 years ago. The butcher retired about 5 years ago. The only retail premises is the pub and guess what, it's closed. So, if the villagers and me can't leave our village, what do we do? Starve? " Going to a shop for food is an essential journey! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not heavy handed. No. Self accountability... over a year now. Stay home not hard is it? They drove miles... could have had an accident put the emergency service at risk. Both went to get coffee? Takeaway! Essential. No. Yes you can exercise with someone but really? If everyone does this there oudh really a lockdown is there? Everyone behaves like children going to the extreme within the rules. Just start at fucking home. Get stuff delivered... maybe go for shopping once a week or two weeks on your own. And fucking go for a run outside your house. If be giving livid in my nan died because sone smart arsenal family member has to go meet their friend from the other side of town to exercise in a park miles away and but need to pop in for a coffee for good measure. Because "they can within the rules" Say it with me STAY FUCKING HOME PROTECT THE NHS SAVE LIVES. Note: is isn't go Costa meet your friend have a run... make it miles away from home. " Policeman with poor understanding of rules or on a power trip Could have had an accident? Hypothetically they can have an accident in the home and put same emergency services at risk. Assumption that both went - 1 person maybe bought both, maybe not essential but still within the “rules” Don’t get your issue with the yes you can exercise with one person - again within the “rules” Stay at home Get stuff delivered - NO all the delivery folk should be at home they might have an accident and put the emergency services at risk Go for your shopping once a week - NO stay fucking home! You’ve had a year to prepare for this you should have everything you need at home, don’t want to risk having an accident and risking others lives do you Yes I’m being arsey but none of this is a simple black or white situation so neither are the “rules” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m a bit worried about going out on my mountain bike in case the police think i am of to somewhere with a few peaks. " Likewise. Im not really warmed up till 5 miles out ... how far can i cycle ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So I’ve just read a story in the news that two people drove to an area (about 5 miles) in separate cars to exercise together. They also had hot drinks with them. The police fined them £200 each and said they were breaking rules as it was classed as a picnic. Do you think this is heavy handed? Or just? " Finally some order being enforced... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going to defend the police. They have an impossible task on their hands, and all WE are being asked to do is stay at home, watch telly and scoff food. Exercise or not, at times they will have to make examples of people, just to keep us alert if nothing else. We're all paying the price for those who socialised over the last month and we just have to accept that one day, costs us maybe 6 weeks of restrictions, and instead of trying to fight the system and just knuckle down, otherwise we'll end up in this eternal cycle for the whole of 2021. " someone with a bit of sense.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |