FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > to vaccine or not
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please" Personal decision forget "opinions" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No brainer for me. I'll be in the queue as soon as it is available to the general public. A great day for science. That has had big backing. I have not agreed with many of the restrictions that have been placed on us, but in an attempt to get things back to some sort of normality I have complied. The vaccine is the end game for this so I will be jumping af the opportunity " Yes me too. Just listening to different professors on tv, who all agree the vaccine has been rigourously tested, with no issues. They still don't know how long immunity will last, but it's better than nothing and will take pressure off the nhs. On a slightly selfish note, by the time I get, it would have been given to thousands of people, so any problems will have shown up by then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them" Yes, I see what you're saying, but I doubt that will happen.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm only asking so i can make my own mind up, but i'm willing to hear both sides of the argument" About restrictions? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them" Why and what? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them Why and what?" With the comments above yours I dont think you would be able to travel abroad and possibly not be able to go near vulnerable people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please" Good question and I’m very much in the same boat here. As a former odds compiler I’m struggling to see how a 95% successful vaccine for a disease with less than a 1% fatality rate makes any logical sense. In time I can see being vaccinated becoming a necessity in order to live anything like a ‘normal’ life. As it stands I’ll be one of the last to be eligible so would expect any teething problems to be well ironed out before it’s my turn. The vaccine itself does not concern me, being forced to take it does. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i see your point, thank you" Can you use the quote button when you reply, we don't know who youre replying to | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please" I am not an expert and so wouldn't attempt to influence you but I have a friend who is an ICU consultant who gave me this advice. He asked if I would drive my car every day without wearing a seat belt. Obviously my answer was no. His answer was that far more people die in car crashes because they ARE wearing there seat belt than die worldwide due to reactions to vaccines! When I said yes but this vaccine has been developed very quickly and may not have been tested as well as others he pointed out that these vaccines have all been tested on thousands of people without any serious side effects whereas other products that we use everyday ( cosmetics, sun tan lotion etc etc) may only be tested by 100 people before they are allowed to be sold. Tens of thousands of people die after allergic reactions to everyday products/food etc that we don't even think about before using. He admitted that no vaccine is risk free and there will be some people who have a reaction and possibly die as a result of having the vaccine but the risk is minute in comparison to not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you are fighting for you life it will be too late for the vaccine to work. Thats the point" When you're up against the zombies a shotgun and a machete might be more useful than a syringe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please" There will allways be those who say not to but in time you will not be able to go clubs theatres etc and no flying to Spain for holidays. We have controlling bodies that throught the world are respected thedy have a proven track record. The anti vaxers are just very ignorant with no science in what they say | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please I am not an expert and so wouldn't attempt to influence you but I have a friend who is an ICU consultant who gave me this advice. He asked if I would drive my car every day without wearing a seat belt. Obviously my answer was no. His answer was that far more people die in car crashes because they ARE wearing there seat belt than die worldwide due to reactions to vaccines! When I said yes but this vaccine has been developed very quickly and may not have been tested as well as others he pointed out that these vaccines have all been tested on thousands of people without any serious side effects whereas other products that we use everyday ( cosmetics, sun tan lotion etc etc) may only be tested by 100 people before they are allowed to be sold. Tens of thousands of people die after allergic reactions to everyday products/food etc that we don't even think about before using. He admitted that no vaccine is risk free and there will be some people who have a reaction and possibly die as a result of having the vaccine but the risk is minute in comparison to not. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them" Why? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why does wearing a seatbelt make you more likely to die in a car crash ?" it does not but in a few rare accidents you might have been safer without the seatbelt & similarly if you are the 1 in a million to react badly to the jab you might be safer without | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why does wearing a seatbelt make you more likely to die in a car crash ?" The never said that reread it. They said in some accidents actually wearing the seat belt contributed to the person dying. Is this common not at all. Is wearing a seat belt safer than not wearing one absolutely. Regardless depending on the collision factors wearing a seltbelt in a small number of cases can go against you. That's what they were referring to. KJ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Absolutely for it. And I’ve had covid and positive antibodies now for 6 months. It’s not “rushed” it’s just had every bit of funding and every country thrown at it where usually it takes years of a handful of people. It’s not a new vaccine, it’s an amended flu jab so didn’t need to be created from scratch which in turn reduces time and gives a better understanding of side effects. Each to their own xx" And to be honest, if it was absolutely only my own risk- I probably wouldn’t have it. But we all know that’s not how covid works and I’d be putting other people at risk that would be more susceptible which isn’t okay for me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why does wearing a seatbelt make you more likely to die in a car crash ?" It makes you less likely to die overall. But there will obviously be some few corner cases where because of freak circumstances the seatbelt might increase the injuries. Eg. Seatbelt getting stuck and preventing wearer getting out of a burning car. Accidental strangulation while having sex in car. Faulty belt tensioner causing chest to be crushed. Mostly though the seatbelt will do its job of preventing the driver going through the windscreen or being impaled on the steering column... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why does wearing a seatbelt make you more likely to die in a car crash ?" Damn Volvo saving lives lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please" Nice discussion so far, i don't think anyone should feel bullied one way or the other. For me, whenever I'm offered it, I will have it. I can't imagine that will be anytime soon op so not something I need to spend much time thinking about for a year probably. You're younger than me so unless you're an NHS front line or care home worker, it's unlikely to be coming your way anytime soon either. We should all be mindful of what we put in our bodies... I wonder how many people look at their vitamins, supplements, foods, prescription medication in as much detail as this vaccine has generated. It's good to be aware and make informed decisions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please" Hi, I have no reason to not take it when available to myself, I don't do all the bullshit about it's only taken a year etc or it's a bill gates special. For me it's had billions of dollars/pounds investing and finding a vaccine and it has had countless amounts of houses thrown at it too. My reason for taking it would be to protect my extremely vulnerable family. I'm guessing o won't need to make that decision until about April looking at the data of roll out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm only asking so i can make my own mind up, but i'm willing to hear both sides of the argument" I'm yet to see an 'argument' to why anyone wouldn't take it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm yet to see an 'argument' to why anyone wouldn't take it" What is the take up rate on other vaccinations eg MMR, HPV, flu ? No where bear 100%. People have various reasons for choosing not to be innoculated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them Yes, I see what you're saying, but I doubt that will happen.." And nor should it happen. We don't live in a totalitarian state | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My understanding of the vaccines is it’s not an immunity, like measles for example, but it’s more to try and help your body deal with it when you do catch it.... you won’t know it’s level until you do catch it and whether vaccine has been successful as I don’t think they plan on testing each person after their doses So having the vaccine will reduce the effects you feel hoping your body has generated the necessary cells to fight it, but it doesn’t stop you catching it and the unknown as yet whether you can still pass it on. I can understand why individuals would be cautious about having something that may give them a 70-95% chance of fighting it in their own body; along with all this talk of if you don’t have it you can’t do this, this or this when there are still so many unknowns to this virus and the possible vaccines and the help they could give. That is my layman’s term of what I understand about them at the minute, correct me if I’m wrong. My household is bottom of the list, so hoping for more clarity on it before I have to decide " That's pretty much my understanding , so we still have to follow all the rules, even after having the vaccination. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My understanding of the vaccines is it’s not an immunity, like measles for example, but it’s more to try and help your body deal with it when you do catch it.... you won’t know it’s level until you do catch it and whether vaccine has been successful as I don’t think they plan on testing each person after their doses So having the vaccine will reduce the effects you feel hoping your body has generated the necessary cells to fight it, but it doesn’t stop you catching it and the unknown as yet whether you can still pass it on. I can understand why individuals would be cautious about having something that may give them a 70-95% chance of fighting it in their own body; along with all this talk of if you don’t have it you can’t do this, this or this when there are still so many unknowns to this virus and the possible vaccines and the help they could give. That is my layman’s term of what I understand about them at the minute, correct me if I’m wrong. My household is bottom of the list, so hoping for more clarity on it before I have to decide That's pretty much my understanding , so we still have to follow all the rules, even after having the vaccination." That’s how I understand it too, social distancing, masks etc will still be around for quite some time following the vaccine | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My understanding of the vaccines is it’s not an immunity, like measles for example, but it’s more to try and help your body deal with it when you do catch it.... you won’t know it’s level until you do catch it and whether vaccine has been successful as I don’t think they plan on testing each person after their doses So having the vaccine will reduce the effects you feel hoping your body has generated the necessary cells to fight it, but it doesn’t stop you catching it and the unknown as yet whether you can still pass it on. I can understand why individuals would be cautious about having something that may give them a 70-95% chance of fighting it in their own body; along with all this talk of if you don’t have it you can’t do this, this or this when there are still so many unknowns to this virus and the possible vaccines and the help they could give. That is my layman’s term of what I understand about them at the minute, correct me if I’m wrong. My household is bottom of the list, so hoping for more clarity on it before I have to decide " Yes thats right Spurs The mRNA vaccine essentially preps your bodies T and memory cells into recognising coronavirus earlier than normal so it can mount a more efficient defence response. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No brainer for me. I'll be in the queue as soon as it is available to the general public. A great day for science. That has had big backing. I have not agreed with many of the restrictions that have been placed on us, but in an attempt to get things back to some sort of normality I have complied. The vaccine is the end game for this so I will be jumping af the opportunity Yes me too. Just listening to different professors on tv, who all agree the vaccine has been rigourously tested, with no issues. They still don't know how long immunity will last, but it's better than nothing and will take pressure off the nhs. On a slightly selfish note, by the time I get, it would have been given to thousands of people, so any problems will have shown up by then " The real results may become evident in 10+years. Obviously too late for those who will suffer, but you'll be remembered as the Guinea pigs who helped propel medical science further by accepting a non-proven, despite the big claims to contrary, vaccine that will do very little to suppress infections, yet will do a great deal to subdue people into loyal subjects of the state. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them" Why? If the vaccine works, those who have it will have nothing to fear from those who don't. You'll be protected, right? Why do you want to restrict my freedom? Propaganda brainwashing has really gotten to you already, evidently... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them Why? If the vaccine works, those who have it will have nothing to fear from those who don't. You'll be protected, right? Why do you want to restrict my freedom? Propaganda brainwashing has really gotten to you already, evidently... " Talking about travel restrictions and why should people do it for you when you wont do it for them? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No brainer for me. I'll be in the queue as soon as it is available to the general public. A great day for science. That has had big backing. I have not agreed with many of the restrictions that have been placed on us, but in an attempt to get things back to some sort of normality I have complied. The vaccine is the end game for this so I will be jumping af the opportunity Yes me too. Just listening to different professors on tv, who all agree the vaccine has been rigourously tested, with no issues. They still don't know how long immunity will last, but it's better than nothing and will take pressure off the nhs. On a slightly selfish note, by the time I get, it would have been given to thousands of people, so any problems will have shown up by then The real results may become evident in 10+years. Obviously too late for those who will suffer, but you'll be remembered as the Guinea pigs who helped propel medical science further by accepting a non-proven, despite the big claims to contrary, vaccine that will do very little to suppress infections, yet will do a great deal to subdue people into loyal subjects of the state. " Thank you for that, I'll still have it. Having listened to our nhs staff, on here and their experiences looking after very sick and dying patients, I really don't want to catch Covid, it sounds an awful and painful death. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I look forward to being allowed into a pub and seeing people who wont have the vaccine being turned away, then its fair, dont want the vaccine fine, live in isolation! In France I believe it will be compulsory, quite right to, far too much wine to be d*unk and Coffee sipped to wait" But why do you want people to be restricted when you'll have full protection by having taken the vaccine? It doesn't make any sense at all! Unless, you simply enjoy causing misery to others. But that would be a whole different question that has nothing to do with vaccine and virus And what if I have already had the virus, suffered with it, went through all oxygen masks and intubation, fatigued for months afterwards, fully recovered with anybodies and immunity that will last 100 years, yet a fat doorman stops me at the pub and asks for a shitty immunusation passport for a vaccine that noone knows the long term side effects, and besides the duration of the alleged immunity may last shorter than my pub visit. Bloody world that is going to be! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone refusing vac should be ashamed....if we all do this then we can get back to a normal life quicker" What a crazy thing to say,everyone has a personal choice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My understanding of the vaccines is it’s not an immunity, like measles for example, but it’s more to try and help your body deal with it when you do catch it.... you won’t know it’s level until you do catch it and whether vaccine has been successful as I don’t think they plan on testing each person after their doses So having the vaccine will reduce the effects you feel hoping your body has generated the necessary cells to fight it, but it doesn’t stop you catching it and the unknown as yet whether you can still pass it on. I can understand why individuals would be cautious about having something that may give them a 70-95% chance of fighting it in their own body; along with all this talk of if you don’t have it you can’t do this, this or this when there are still so many unknowns to this virus and the possible vaccines and the help they could give. That is my layman’s term of what I understand about them at the minute, correct me if I’m wrong. My household is bottom of the list, so hoping for more clarity on it before I have to decide Yes thats right Spurs The mRNA vaccine essentially preps your bodies T and memory cells into recognising coronavirus earlier than normal so it can mount a more efficient defence response. " Thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please I am not an expert and so wouldn't attempt to influence you but I have a friend who is an ICU consultant who gave me this advice. He asked if I would drive my car every day without wearing a seat belt. Obviously my answer was no. His answer was that far more people die in car crashes because they ARE wearing there seat belt than die worldwide due to reactions to vaccines! When I said yes but this vaccine has been developed very quickly and may not have been tested as well as others he pointed out that these vaccines have all been tested on thousands of people without any serious side effects whereas other products that we use everyday ( cosmetics, sun tan lotion etc etc) may only be tested by 100 people before they are allowed to be sold. Tens of thousands of people die after allergic reactions to everyday products/food etc that we don't even think about before using. He admitted that no vaccine is risk free and there will be some people who have a reaction and possibly die as a result of having the vaccine but the risk is minute in comparison to not. " This is all very well explained by a physician. Add to it that accepting the vaccine or not should be a free choice for everyone and no restrictions will be placed on those who don't elect to have the vaccine, and we have a perfectly well functioning society. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I look forward to being allowed into a pub and seeing people who wont have the vaccine being turned away, then its fair, dont want the vaccine fine, live in isolation! In France I believe it will be compulsory, quite right to, far too much wine to be d*unk and Coffee sipped to wait But why do you want people to be restricted when you'll have full protection by having taken the vaccine? It doesn't make any sense at all! Unless, you simply enjoy causing misery to others. But that would be a whole different question that has nothing to do with vaccine and virus And what if I have already had the virus, suffered with it, went through all oxygen masks and intubation, fatigued for months afterwards, fully recovered with anybodies and immunity that will last 100 years, yet a fat doorman stops me at the pub and asks for a shitty immunusation passport for a vaccine that noone knows the long term side effects, and besides the duration of the alleged immunity may last shorter than my pub visit. Bloody world that is going to be! " Wow....a FAT doorman stops you? Wow why bring someone's body into your post? People are all shapes and sizes thank god and ill thank him for keeping you out of the bars | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please Good question and I’m very much in the same boat here. As a former odds compiler I’m struggling to see how a 95% successful vaccine for a disease with less than a 1% fatality rate makes any logical sense. In time I can see being vaccinated becoming a necessity in order to live anything like a ‘normal’ life. As it stands I’ll be one of the last to be eligible so would expect any teething problems to be well ironed out before it’s my turn. The vaccine itself does not concern me, being forced to take it does." It's not as straightforward as that though. First thing to say is that if you now have a 1% chance of dying if you get cover, your chances are vastly reduced of dying even if you are in the 5% that the vaccine doesn't protect completely as the symptoms are likely to be reduced significantly. Secondly if you and those you come into contact with most have the vaccine you all protect each other so that your chances of coming into contact with the virus at all are reduced. Thirdly and probably the most importantly based on personal experience having suffered from covid back in March - it's not just the 1% who die. I am still suffering from the after effects of the virus now, you really don't want to get this virus. Things are getting better but I'm not sure if they will return to how they were before. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No brainer for me. I'll be in the queue as soon as it is available to the general public. A great day for science. That has had big backing. I have not agreed with many of the restrictions that have been placed on us, but in an attempt to get things back to some sort of normality I have complied. The vaccine is the end game for this so I will be jumping af the opportunity Yes me too. Just listening to different professors on tv, who all agree the vaccine has been rigourously tested, with no issues. They still don't know how long immunity will last, but it's better than nothing and will take pressure off the nhs. On a slightly selfish note, by the time I get, it would have been given to thousands of people, so any problems will have shown up by then The real results may become evident in 10+years. Obviously too late for those who will suffer, but you'll be remembered as the Guinea pigs who helped propel medical science further by accepting a non-proven, despite the big claims to contrary, vaccine that will do very little to suppress infections, yet will do a great deal to subdue people into loyal subjects of the state. Thank you for that, I'll still have it. Having listened to our nhs staff, on here and their experiences looking after very sick and dying patients, I really don't want to catch Covid, it sounds an awful and painful death." It is. A number of my friends are doctors and nurses. I've heard it directly from them, as if I've been there by the bedside of gasping for air dying patients, some of them very young. The virus is real and the danger is grave. Yet, a rushed vaccine (whatever they tell you about rigorous testing) should never be made compulsory. Any vaccine for that matter, should ever be compulsory. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I live my life, assuming I'm safe, based on the checks and balances that society puts into place. My chair won't collapse, my house won't fall down, my food won't kill me. These things are safety checked to ensure we don't have to worry. So are vaccines. And the standard for vaccines to be deemed safe is higher than many other things, and is much safer than what it's trying to reduce or prevent. Even if you're low risk for Covid-19, the risk of a vaccine is lower. Yes, vaccines have risks. I actually have personal experience with severe adverse reaction to a vaccination. To me it's about choosing the risk of the disease versus choosing the risk of the vaccine. If any of these vaccines were as dangerous as Covid-19, people would have died. They have not. Ultimately the study results will come out and be examined closely by those who know how to read them. The signs are definitely encouraging so far, and our regulatory agency thinks it's encouraging enough that it's willing to jump the gun (it will have looked at some data). Vaccines prevent either serious illness or any illness. They not only protect you, but they also protect those for whom the vaccine does not work or who can't be vaccinated through no fault of their own. But to do this, enough people need to be vaccinated to shield these vulnerable groups. Given the UK and global disease burden, effective vaccination is one of the few tools we have to get our lives back." This 100% | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them" restrictions, like what.... You can't leave the house. The government have said taking the vaccine won't be compulsory. Everyone has a choice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone refusing vac should be ashamed....if we all do this then we can get back to a normal life quicker" I'm waiting and watching. I'm not ashamed, I've worked all through this as a nurse. If they tell me I cant work, so be it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on themrestrictions, like what.... You can't leave the house. The government have said taking the vaccine won't be compulsory. Everyone has a choice " But there are indeed talks that people may be prevented from certain access and freedoms, hence immunisation passports are on the offing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone refusing vac should be ashamed....if we all do this then we can get back to a normal life quicker I'm waiting and watching. I'm not ashamed, I've worked all through this as a nurse. If they tell me I cant work, so be it. " You won't have long to wait some our friends working in the NHS are expecting to have their vaccination tomorrow! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone refusing vac should be ashamed....if we all do this then we can get back to a normal life quicker I'm waiting and watching. I'm not ashamed, I've worked all through this as a nurse. If they tell me I cant work, so be it. " Wise words from someone with the most benevolent, yet underpaid job! Hats off to you for your service and for your wisdom! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No brainer for me. I'll be in the queue as soon as it is available to the general public. A great day for science. That has had big backing. I have not agreed with many of the restrictions that have been placed on us, but in an attempt to get things back to some sort of normality I have complied. The vaccine is the end game for this so I will be jumping af the opportunity Yes me too. Just listening to different professors on tv, who all agree the vaccine has been rigourously tested, with no issues. They still don't know how long immunity will last, but it's better than nothing and will take pressure off the nhs. On a slightly selfish note, by the time I get, it would have been given to thousands of people, so any problems will have shown up by then The real results may become evident in 10+years. Obviously too late for those who will suffer, but you'll be remembered as the Guinea pigs who helped propel medical science further by accepting a non-proven, despite the big claims to contrary, vaccine that will do very little to suppress infections, yet will do a great deal to subdue people into loyal subjects of the state. Thank you for that, I'll still have it. Having listened to our nhs staff, on here and their experiences looking after very sick and dying patients, I really don't want to catch Covid, it sounds an awful and painful death. It is. A number of my friends are doctors and nurses. I've heard it directly from them, as if I've been there by the bedside of gasping for air dying patients, some of them very young. The virus is real and the danger is grave. Yet, a rushed vaccine (whatever they tell you about rigorous testing) should never be made compulsory. Any vaccine for that matter, should ever be compulsory. " Oh I agree it shouldn't be compulsory. What is the opinion of your nhs friends, as a matter of interest, do they think it is advisable that we have it, because it would certainly take the pressure off them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them Why? If the vaccine works, those who have it will have nothing to fear from those who don't. You'll be protected, right? Why do you want to restrict my freedom? Propaganda brainwashing has really gotten to you already, evidently... " Oh dear. You're embarrassing yourself with your ignorance. You clearly have no understanding of how vaccines work or even the process of testing and producing them. The irony of your brainwashing quote. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm yet to see an 'argument' to why anyone wouldn't take it What is the take up rate on other vaccinations eg MMR, HPV, flu ? No where bear 100%. People have various reasons for choosing not to be innoculated. " Still not seen any plausible arguments. People can have whatever reason they like, doesn't make it persuasive. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm yet to see an 'argument' to why anyone wouldn't take it What is the take up rate on other vaccinations eg MMR, HPV, flu ? No where bear 100%. People have various reasons for choosing not to be innoculated. Still not seen any plausible arguments. People can have whatever reason they like, doesn't make it persuasive. " Same here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on themrestrictions, like what.... You can't leave the house. The government have said taking the vaccine won't be compulsory. Everyone has a choice But there are indeed talks that people may be prevented from certain access and freedoms, hence immunisation passports are on the offing. " And rightly so, until the danger of the pandemic has passed. It means your not going to be forced to have the vaccine so you have a choice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So who's had covid?" I had covid back in March and still had symptoms for 3 months. My son had covid last month and was very poorly for 3 weeks. My butcher's father died from covid pneumonia 2 weeks ago and my neice has had it where she couldn't walk and hold things for some time. I will definitely have the vaccine. The more people who take up the vaccine the sooner we can end the restrictions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on themrestrictions, like what.... You can't leave the house. The government have said taking the vaccine won't be compulsory. Everyone has a choice But there are indeed talks that people may be prevented from certain access and freedoms, hence immunisation passports are on the offing. " This is nothing new if you don’t have seroconversion for Hep -B in Dentistry then you are unable to work until you have a booster and seroconvert. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them" so some will take it and some will not, but how will we know who has not taken it, so we can distance from those people? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them" Like what? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them Why and what? With the comments above yours I dont think you would be able to travel abroad and possibly not be able to go near vulnerable people" Isn't that an opinion? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them so some will take it and some will not, but how will we know who has not taken it, so we can distance from those people? " If you have had the vaccine and developed anti bodies then you don't need to avoid them, they need to avoid you, in fact they would need to continue to social distance or shield as necessary possibly for the rest of their life but it's their choice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There is no discussion. You don't want don't take. Quite simple. Wonder if it would be different if someone was told, refuse it and you will go to end of queue or if you get covid you won't be treated by NHS ? " It’s against human rights | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you don't want to take it thats your decision but I also think people who don't take it should still have restrictions placed on them Why? If the vaccine works, those who have it will have nothing to fear from those who don't. You'll be protected, right? Why do you want to restrict my freedom? Propaganda brainwashing has really gotten to you already, evidently... " Absolutely | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There is no discussion. You don't want don't take. Quite simple. Wonder if it would be different if someone was told, refuse it and you will go to end of queue or if you get covid you won't be treated by NHS ? It’s against human rights" Try telling that to people who smoke, drink excessively or are overweight and refused treatment It's reality ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I look forward to being allowed into a pub and seeing people who wont have the vaccine being turned away, then its fair, dont want the vaccine fine, live in isolation! In France I believe it will be compulsory, quite right to, far too much wine to be d*unk and Coffee sipped to wait But why do you want people to be restricted when you'll have full protection by having taken the vaccine? It doesn't make any sense at all! Unless, you simply enjoy causing misery to others. But that would be a whole different question that has nothing to do with vaccine and virus And what if I have already had the virus, suffered with it, went through all oxygen masks and intubation, fatigued for months afterwards, fully recovered with anybodies and immunity that will last 100 years, yet a fat doorman stops me at the pub and asks for a shitty immunusation passport for a vaccine that noone knows the long term side effects, and besides the duration of the alleged immunity may last shorter than my pub visit. Bloody world that is going to be! " Very well said plus I think there'll be a flourishing trade in copy Vaccination Certificates | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So who's had covid? I had covid back in March and still had symptoms for 3 months. My son had covid last month and was very poorly for 3 weeks. My butcher's father died from covid pneumonia 2 weeks ago and my neice has had it where she couldn't walk and hold things for some time. I will definitely have the vaccine. The more people who take up the vaccine the sooner we can end the restrictions. " I had it back in March. I am still suffering considerably 8 months later. Knowing what I know I would advise everyone who can have the vaccine to get it as soon as they can, you are not only protecting yourself but those around you. And don't think I'm fit and healthy it won't affect me. A week before I caught the virus I had ridden 80 miles on my bike, one of the teachers at my Grandson's school, a fit 24 year old semi professional footballer died after contracting covid in June, and 40% of the patients in intensive care out our local hospital are under 50. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There is no discussion. You don't want don't take. Quite simple. Wonder if it would be different if someone was told, refuse it and you will go to end of queue or if you get covid you won't be treated by NHS ? It’s against human rights Try telling that to people who smoke, drink excessively or are overweight and refused treatment It's reality ..." To be fair, that is a completely different argument Smoking is a choice, may be addicted but still a choice Drink is a choice, again may be addicted and becomes a medical problem whether some class it as a disease or illness Overweight may not necessarily be a choice. It could be a medical problem, disease or illness or some phycological reasons. Not necessarily a choice. Why should any of the above be refused NHS treatment and let's say that they were. Don't they have the right NOT to pay into the National Insurance system? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A lot of those who say they are not going to be vaccinated will soon change their minds when they want to go on holiday and realise that they can't get holiday insurance. Even with a high vaccine take up covid is going to be around in high numbers for at least a couple of years. Insurance companies will have no choice but to require covid vaccination ( just as they do other vaccinations now) or the costs could be enormous. " Ah, so is this fact or assuming? Afaik, the op said not opinions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm yet to see an 'argument' to why anyone wouldn't take it What is the take up rate on other vaccinations eg MMR, HPV, flu ? No where bear 100%. People have various reasons for choosing not to be innoculated. " You have a great point there , how many people who are pro Covid vaccine are anti Flu vaccine ? I John have the Flu vaccine where as Jill doesn't , If I choose to take the Covid vaccine that will be my choice I will not be forced to have just so to give me a social passport . To many hypocrites have surfaced since the beginning of this pandemic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There is no discussion. You don't want don't take. Quite simple. Wonder if it would be different if someone was told, refuse it and you will go to end of queue or if you get covid you won't be treated by NHS ? " Doubt it because most of those who will refuse it are probably doing it on moral or risk adverse grounds and have probably spent more time knowing why they won't than the majority who won't have thought much beyond the idea that if they get it the quicker they can start meeting up again. I know this isn't the case for all but reading between the lines can often reveal the drive behind many of the comments especially the constant repetitive shammers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well done for all your views, I'll have a quiet read of them in a bit. My next question - IF i decided to meet someone, do I accept their word that they've had the vaccine. Only ask, because they all say they are single, till they have to be home for dinner!!!! " Im sure it will be on an app on there phone....Next to wife's phone number lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well the nhs are setting up centres to deal with all the side effects from the vaccine and work out what to do with NHs staff that can’t work because of side effects........ Mrs works for the NHs " What is your source for this information? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well the nhs are setting up centres to deal with all the side effects from the vaccine and work out what to do with NHs staff that can’t work because of side effects........ Mrs works for the NHs What is your source for this information?" Didn't you see? Mrs works for the NHS... so no doubt has some strategic oversight of the vaccination strategy. Either that or it's just typical hearsay and spurious bollocks... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Now this is hard are we going to be able to pick witch vaccine we get? If it's the Pfizer 1 I'd rather not. But the AstraZeneca vaccine I'd be happy about. " Yeah, I'll wait for the Oxford one to be approved. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well the nhs are setting up centres to deal with all the side effects from the vaccine and work out what to do with NHs staff that can’t work because of side effects........ Mrs works for the NHs What is your source for this information?" My source is Mrs B ...... she’s an NHs workforce manager, it’s what she’s been working on today ..... not making it up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well the nhs are setting up centres to deal with all the side effects from the vaccine and work out what to do with NHs staff that can’t work because of side effects........ Mrs works for the NHs " I wouldn't be at all surprised, they have already published a list of known side effects, haven't you read them ? Headaches, fever etc they could end up with some staff having to go home after the vaccine so they make plans ? No big conspiracy there then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do take the flu jab usually every year but Im not so keen on a covid one. Seems almost a waste to give it to everyone, including all those unlikely to ever be ill, and I know it's all to do with protecting the vulnerable, herd immunity stuff but could the vaccine become a little something like what the pnuemonia jab is, given to those over a certain age and vulnerable for pnuemonia and they get their protection that way. So I think Im saying it would be a waste to give it to me and less at risk others? Dunno. " I see what you're saying, I think. But I think the answer is, those who are vaccinated who it doesn't protect. If Doris, 95 with heart problems (a fictional character to illustrate) gets the shot and doesn't get a protective immune response, then when the younger people are vaccinated, they're less likely to transmit to her, even though we need it less. That's what herd immunity is. I might be fine. I'm happy to wait because it's likely I'd be fine. But I'll get the jab so I can protect the Dorises out there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well the nhs are setting up centres to deal with all the side effects from the vaccine and work out what to do with NHs staff that can’t work because of side effects........ Mrs works for the NHs What is your source for this information? Didn't you see? Mrs works for the NHS... so no doubt has some strategic oversight of the vaccination strategy. Either that or it's just typical hearsay and spurious bollocks..." My Daughter in law is a senior manager at a hospital in Kent and she is unaware of such a scheme. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well the nhs are setting up centres to deal with all the side effects from the vaccine and work out what to do with NHs staff that can’t work because of side effects........ Mrs works for the NHs " I'd like to read your source if you'd like to disclose it. I've a few family members who work in the NHS at various levels and quite a few doctor friends. Never heard this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well the nhs are setting up centres to deal with all the side effects from the vaccine and work out what to do with NHs staff that can’t work because of side effects........ Mrs works for the NHs What is your source for this information? Didn't you see? Mrs works for the NHS... so no doubt has some strategic oversight of the vaccination strategy. Either that or it's just typical hearsay and spurious bollocks... My Daughter in law is a senior manager at a hospital in Kent and she is unaware of such a scheme." Well this is Oxfordshire | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do take the flu jab usually every year but Im not so keen on a covid one. Seems almost a waste to give it to everyone, including all those unlikely to ever be ill, and I know it's all to do with protecting the vulnerable, herd immunity stuff but could the vaccine become a little something like what the pnuemonia jab is, given to those over a certain age and vulnerable for pnuemonia and they get their protection that way. So I think Im saying it would be a waste to give it to me and less at risk others? Dunno. I see what you're saying, I think. But I think the answer is, those who are vaccinated who it doesn't protect. If Doris, 95 with heart problems (a fictional character to illustrate) gets the shot and doesn't get a protective immune response, then when the younger people are vaccinated, they're less likely to transmit to her, even though we need it less. That's what herd immunity is. I might be fine. I'm happy to wait because it's likely I'd be fine. But I'll get the jab so I can protect the Dorises out there." I agree with your reasoning but is there clear proof that if you are vaccinated you cannot pass it on? This was asked a couple days ago on the news and the answer all round was we don't know yet, unless they have revised this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do take the flu jab usually every year but Im not so keen on a covid one. Seems almost a waste to give it to everyone, including all those unlikely to ever be ill, and I know it's all to do with protecting the vulnerable, herd immunity stuff but could the vaccine become a little something like what the pnuemonia jab is, given to those over a certain age and vulnerable for pnuemonia and they get their protection that way. So I think Im saying it would be a waste to give it to me and less at risk others? Dunno. I see what you're saying, I think. But I think the answer is, those who are vaccinated who it doesn't protect. If Doris, 95 with heart problems (a fictional character to illustrate) gets the shot and doesn't get a protective immune response, then when the younger people are vaccinated, they're less likely to transmit to her, even though we need it less. That's what herd immunity is. I might be fine. I'm happy to wait because it's likely I'd be fine. But I'll get the jab so I can protect the Dorises out there. I agree with your reasoning but is there clear proof that if you are vaccinated you cannot pass it on? This was asked a couple days ago on the news and the answer all round was we don't know yet, unless they have revised this." We don't know as far as I know, but it's the rationale for many vaccines. Plus I want it when it's my turn. If enough are vaccinated Covid will become a non problem, whether through reduced disease or failure to transmit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hi We won’t be taking it as we have already had corona this year February and our immune systems dealt with it. A vaccine does not stop you catching the virus, it entrains your own immune system to recognise and fight it. From our view there is no evidence to suggest that a vaccine will do anything more than our own immune system has already done. However completely understand that if our immune system was compromised and we were in the vulnerable group then we would absolutely have a different view. This is why it is such an individual and polarised choice. There’s loads of information about vaccines and the vaccine companies themselves produce info too, just do due diligence and read their small print... reliability, validity, population the tests were trialled on, were they all young fit and healthy or was the vulnerable and the elderly tested too etc... the more you know outside of opinions the easier it will be to make your decision. " Out of curiosity, what if you require vaccine certification to travel or go to big concerts etc.? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do take the flu jab usually every year but Im not so keen on a covid one. Seems almost a waste to give it to everyone, including all those unlikely to ever be ill, and I know it's all to do with protecting the vulnerable, herd immunity stuff but could the vaccine become a little something like what the pnuemonia jab is, given to those over a certain age and vulnerable for pnuemonia and they get their protection that way. So I think Im saying it would be a waste to give it to me and less at risk others? Dunno. I see what you're saying, I think. But I think the answer is, those who are vaccinated who it doesn't protect. If Doris, 95 with heart problems (a fictional character to illustrate) gets the shot and doesn't get a protective immune response, then when the younger people are vaccinated, they're less likely to transmit to her, even though we need it less. That's what herd immunity is. I might be fine. I'm happy to wait because it's likely I'd be fine. But I'll get the jab so I can protect the Dorises out there." Poor Doris yes, assuming I and others get the correct immune response from it too. It's all stacking cards of uncertainty isnt it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do take the flu jab usually every year but Im not so keen on a covid one. Seems almost a waste to give it to everyone, including all those unlikely to ever be ill, and I know it's all to do with protecting the vulnerable, herd immunity stuff but could the vaccine become a little something like what the pnuemonia jab is, given to those over a certain age and vulnerable for pnuemonia and they get their protection that way. So I think Im saying it would be a waste to give it to me and less at risk others? Dunno. I see what you're saying, I think. But I think the answer is, those who are vaccinated who it doesn't protect. If Doris, 95 with heart problems (a fictional character to illustrate) gets the shot and doesn't get a protective immune response, then when the younger people are vaccinated, they're less likely to transmit to her, even though we need it less. That's what herd immunity is. I might be fine. I'm happy to wait because it's likely I'd be fine. But I'll get the jab so I can protect the Dorises out there. Poor Doris yes, assuming I and others get the correct immune response from it too. It's all stacking cards of uncertainty isnt it. " Yes, but it's the same with every vaccine. We don't worry about measles encephalitis, generally, even though not everyone can be vaccinated against measles and it isn't 100% effective (and measles is up to 10x more contagious than Covid). Enough of us are vaccinated that measles usually doesn't spread, so we don't have to worry about nasty brain swelling and stuff like that. Herd immunity is all of us standing around Doris, protecting her. Some of us might not, but hopefully the layer standing around us will, etc. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do take the flu jab usually every year but Im not so keen on a covid one. Seems almost a waste to give it to everyone, including all those unlikely to ever be ill, and I know it's all to do with protecting the vulnerable, herd immunity stuff but could the vaccine become a little something like what the pnuemonia jab is, given to those over a certain age and vulnerable for pnuemonia and they get their protection that way. So I think Im saying it would be a waste to give it to me and less at risk others? Dunno. I see what you're saying, I think. But I think the answer is, those who are vaccinated who it doesn't protect. If Doris, 95 with heart problems (a fictional character to illustrate) gets the shot and doesn't get a protective immune response, then when the younger people are vaccinated, they're less likely to transmit to her, even though we need it less. That's what herd immunity is. I might be fine. I'm happy to wait because it's likely I'd be fine. But I'll get the jab so I can protect the Dorises out there. I agree with your reasoning but is there clear proof that if you are vaccinated you cannot pass it on? This was asked a couple days ago on the news and the answer all round was we don't know yet, unless they have revised this. We don't know as far as I know, but it's the rationale for many vaccines. Plus I want it when it's my turn. If enough are vaccinated Covid will become a non problem, whether through reduced disease or failure to transmit." But we are we then not talking worldwide vaccination to prevent hotspots re-emerging and then introducing global testing that identifies any changes the virus does to combat the antibodies and then vaccines need modified, much like the flu unless I've misunderstood. Tourism would need to be stopped for say a year or 18 months to make sure any hotspots die out unless one is traveling between two covid neural countries. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do take the flu jab usually every year but Im not so keen on a covid one. Seems almost a waste to give it to everyone, including all those unlikely to ever be ill, and I know it's all to do with protecting the vulnerable, herd immunity stuff but could the vaccine become a little something like what the pnuemonia jab is, given to those over a certain age and vulnerable for pnuemonia and they get their protection that way. So I think Im saying it would be a waste to give it to me and less at risk others? Dunno. I see what you're saying, I think. But I think the answer is, those who are vaccinated who it doesn't protect. If Doris, 95 with heart problems (a fictional character to illustrate) gets the shot and doesn't get a protective immune response, then when the younger people are vaccinated, they're less likely to transmit to her, even though we need it less. That's what herd immunity is. I might be fine. I'm happy to wait because it's likely I'd be fine. But I'll get the jab so I can protect the Dorises out there. I agree with your reasoning but is there clear proof that if you are vaccinated you cannot pass it on? This was asked a couple days ago on the news and the answer all round was we don't know yet, unless they have revised this. We don't know as far as I know, but it's the rationale for many vaccines. Plus I want it when it's my turn. If enough are vaccinated Covid will become a non problem, whether through reduced disease or failure to transmit. But we are we then not talking worldwide vaccination to prevent hotspots re-emerging and then introducing global testing that identifies any changes the virus does to combat the antibodies and then vaccines need modified, much like the flu unless I've misunderstood. Tourism would need to be stopped for say a year or 18 months to make sure any hotspots die out unless one is traveling between two covid neural countries." Ideally yes, but not necessarily. If Citizen A isn't vaccinated, she comes into contact with say 20 people a day every day, maybe up to 140 infection opportunities a week, all the time. If Tourist B isn't vaccinated (assuming we don't demand vaccination before entry) they're here for maybe a week or two before they become someone else's problem. The goal isn't eradication, it's reduction of risk to background levels. Measles still pops up in the UK. People come in with TB. But we don't have to grind society to a halt - we have little outbreaks and deal with it quickly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do take the flu jab usually every year but Im not so keen on a covid one. Seems almost a waste to give it to everyone, including all those unlikely to ever be ill, and I know it's all to do with protecting the vulnerable, herd immunity stuff but could the vaccine become a little something like what the pnuemonia jab is, given to those over a certain age and vulnerable for pnuemonia and they get their protection that way. So I think Im saying it would be a waste to give it to me and less at risk others? Dunno. I see what you're saying, I think. But I think the answer is, those who are vaccinated who it doesn't protect. If Doris, 95 with heart problems (a fictional character to illustrate) gets the shot and doesn't get a protective immune response, then when the younger people are vaccinated, they're less likely to transmit to her, even though we need it less. That's what herd immunity is. I might be fine. I'm happy to wait because it's likely I'd be fine. But I'll get the jab so I can protect the Dorises out there. I agree with your reasoning but is there clear proof that if you are vaccinated you cannot pass it on? This was asked a couple days ago on the news and the answer all round was we don't know yet, unless they have revised this. We don't know as far as I know, but it's the rationale for many vaccines. Plus I want it when it's my turn. If enough are vaccinated Covid will become a non problem, whether through reduced disease or failure to transmit. But we are we then not talking worldwide vaccination to prevent hotspots re-emerging and then introducing global testing that identifies any changes the virus does to combat the antibodies and then vaccines need modified, much like the flu unless I've misunderstood. Tourism would need to be stopped for say a year or 18 months to make sure any hotspots die out unless one is traveling between two covid neural countries. Ideally yes, but not necessarily. If Citizen A isn't vaccinated, she comes into contact with say 20 people a day every day, maybe up to 140 infection opportunities a week, all the time. If Tourist B isn't vaccinated (assuming we don't demand vaccination before entry) they're here for maybe a week or two before they become someone else's problem. The goal isn't eradication, it's reduction of risk to background levels. Measles still pops up in the UK. People come in with TB. But we don't have to grind society to a halt - we have little outbreaks and deal with it quickly." That's true. Let's hope that the vaccine prevents transmission which for me would be the greatest nail in the virus coffin above prevention of contacting it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't believe Bill gates is behind it or that's there's a massive global conspiracy so I'm inclined to believe the scientists and the regulators who say the vaccine is safe and would take it so we can get back to normality, so I can have a beer and steak, watch the football and chill out. Of course there might be some side effects. But I'm on pretty serious meds already that have fatal side effects but taking them is better than the alternative. Same with the covid vaccine as I'm high risk. Yes it would be nice to wait 5 years to see if there are long term effects. But we can't carry on like this for 5 years. People always banging on about suicide rates in lockdown but not bothered enough to take a vaccine to end lockdowns. " That’s all very well but we’ve had Covid, about like a cold for us , so why should we take a vaccine that no one knows what it might do in years to come .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well the nhs are setting up centres to deal with all the side effects from the vaccine and work out what to do with NHs staff that can’t work because of side effects........ Mrs works for the NHs What is your source for this information? Didn't you see? Mrs works for the NHS... so no doubt has some strategic oversight of the vaccination strategy. Either that or it's just typical hearsay and spurious bollocks... My Daughter in law is a senior manager at a hospital in Kent and she is unaware of such a scheme. Well this is Oxfordshire " Your post states it is the NHS who are setting up centres, well as the NHS is nationwide why are they not setting up such centres in counties other than Oxfordshire? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone refusing vac should be ashamed....if we all do this then we can get back to a normal life quicker" I definitely won't feel ashamed because I didn't get a vaccine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not sure if this has been mentioned.... but the no liability clause which has been passed as law is a concern.... no liability for drug company or government...... anyone remember thalidomide???" The law has extended the protection from suit (and pay out options for victims) for Covid-19 vaccines, yes. To the same standard as any other vaccine. The consultation documents on this change are enlightening. I'm not old enough to remember thalidomide, but I do know that the scandal prompted changes in how we monitor safety of drugs, which carries through to this day. Including in these trials | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not sure if this has been mentioned.... but the no liability clause which has been passed as law is a concern.... no liability for drug company or government...... anyone remember thalidomide???" Great someone has answered this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not sure if this has been mentioned.... but the no liability clause which has been passed as law is a concern.... no liability for drug company or government...... anyone remember thalidomide??? The law has extended the protection from suit (and pay out options for victims) for Covid-19 vaccines, yes. To the same standard as any other vaccine. The consultation documents on this change are enlightening. I'm not old enough to remember thalidomide, but I do know that the scandal prompted changes in how we monitor safety of drugs, which carries through to this day. Including in these trials " Interesting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Absolutely for it. And I’ve had covid and positive antibodies now for 6 months. It’s not “rushed” it’s just had every bit of funding and every country thrown at it where usually it takes years of a handful of people. It’s not a new vaccine, it’s an amended flu jab so didn’t need to be created from scratch which in turn reduces time and gives a better understanding of side effects. Each to their own xx" Well said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read the Thalidonide support groups view, it is absolutly nothing like it. That was in the 50's and resulted in the testing regime and approvals. The support society is dumbstruck that the anti vaxxers are using it as an example. Wont go into detail, just have a look, is a total red herring" This surprises me not at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Indeed, the personal choice to kill others, at which point does personal choice become antisocial or dangerous? Is my personal choice to drive at 100mph through a town ok then? Its all about social obligations" If you hit the quote button we'll know who you're replying to | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Absolutely for it. And I’ve had covid and positive antibodies now for 6 months. It’s not “rushed” it’s just had every bit of funding and every country thrown at it where usually it takes years of a handful of people. It’s not a new vaccine, it’s an amended flu jab so didn’t need to be created from scratch which in turn reduces time and gives a better understanding of side effects. Each to their own xx" The AstaZeneca vaccine is a 're work of old covid vaccine I think I read Sarz it is nothing like the Flu jab. As for the Pfizer one don't know much about it. So as stated befor would rather wate for the Oxford vaccine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Absolutely for it. And I’ve had covid and positive antibodies now for 6 months. It’s not “rushed” it’s just had every bit of funding and every country thrown at it where usually it takes years of a handful of people. It’s not a new vaccine, it’s an amended flu jab so didn’t need to be created from scratch which in turn reduces time and gives a better understanding of side effects. Each to their own xx The AstaZeneca vaccine is a 're work of old covid vaccine I think I read Sarz it is nothing like the Flu jab. As for the Pfizer one don't know much about it. So as stated befor would rather wate for the Oxford vaccine. " So do you not want the Oxford AstroZenica vaccine, or would you rather wait for the Oxford AstroZenica vaccine? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read the Thalidonide support groups view, it is absolutly nothing like it. That was in the 50's and resulted in the testing regime and approvals. The support society is dumbstruck that the anti vaxxers are using it as an example. Wont go into detail, just have a look, is a total red herring" Doesn't surprise me at all. That 'example' gets wheeled out on a regular basis. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please Good question and I’m very much in the same boat here. As a former odds compiler I’m struggling to see how a 95% successful vaccine for a disease with less than a 1% fatality rate makes any logical sense. In time I can see being vaccinated becoming a necessity in order to live anything like a ‘normal’ life. As it stands I’ll be one of the last to be eligible so would expect any teething problems to be well ironed out before it’s my turn. The vaccine itself does not concern me, being forced to take it does." Good Post, I'm of the same opinion. X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i'm undecided so up for a CALM discussion. Pros and cons please Good question and I’m very much in the same boat here. As a former odds compiler I’m struggling to see how a 95% successful vaccine for a disease with less than a 1% fatality rate makes any logical sense. In time I can see being vaccinated becoming a necessity in order to live anything like a ‘normal’ life. As it stands I’ll be one of the last to be eligible so would expect any teething problems to be well ironed out before it’s my turn. The vaccine itself does not concern me, being forced to take it does. Good Post, I'm of the same opinion. X" And me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I won't be having it, I'm concerned about the speed of which it's been rushed through, drug companies aren't liable for side affects and the fact that it's only up to 90% effective when the recovery rate for covid is at least 98%, and I think ive probably had it earlier this year anyway. By all means, if people want to have it, they can go ahead and do so, bit don't comdemn others and accuse them of being killers, anti vaxxers etc for exercising their right to choose. " If you are referring to speed of development of the mRNA vaccine. This type of vaccine has been in development for decades not just a single year. Any possible side effects are now well understood as trials have been carried out on 10’s of thousands of people over the years. The difference is that with COVID-19 vast sums of money and people have been thrown at it to isolate the right part of the virus to create a targeted mRNA response. Rather than a small group of researchers continually scrabbling for funding. No one will be forcing you to have the vaccine it will still be your freedom of choice. Though like everything in this life each choice has it’s consequences whether you like it or not. Some professions have a mandatory requirement to be Hepatitis B vaccinated and have seroconversion otherwise you cannot work in that area. It maybe a Hobson’s choice but it’s still a choice. It's all about the dual responsibility of protecting you from others and others from you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I won't be having it, I'm concerned about the speed of which it's been rushed through, drug companies aren't liable for side affects and the fact that it's only up to 90% effective when the recovery rate for covid is at least 98%, and I think ive probably had it earlier this year anyway. By all means, if people want to have it, they can go ahead and do so, bit don't comdemn others and accuse them of being killers, anti vaxxers etc for exercising their right to choose. If you are referring to speed of development of the mRNA vaccine. This type of vaccine has been in development for decades not just a single year. Any possible side effects are now well understood as trials have been carried out on 10’s of thousands of people over the years. The difference is that with COVID-19 vast sums of money and people have been thrown at it to isolate the right part of the virus to create a targeted mRNA response. Rather than a small group of researchers continually scrabbling for funding. No one will be forcing you to have the vaccine it will still be your freedom of choice. Though like everything in this life each choice has it’s consequences whether you like it or not. Some professions have a mandatory requirement to be Hepatitis B vaccinated and have seroconversion otherwise you cannot work in that area. It maybe a Hobson’s choice but it’s still a choice. It's all about the dual responsibility of protecting you from others and others from you. " Sounds interesting. If it was moved that if a person decided not to take up the option of any of the vaccines that are approved, then a list of what they can do or not should be available. As you said, some professionals have a mandatory injection otherwise the can't work in a certain area. That is understandable so, therefore list the areas of prohibited things the anti vaxxers will face if they don't have the injection. They can then make an informed decision whether the prohibited areas of life are worth missing out on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I won't be having it, I'm concerned about the speed of which it's been rushed through, drug companies aren't liable for side affects and the fact that it's only up to 90% effective when the recovery rate for covid is at least 98%, and I think ive probably had it earlier this year anyway. By all means, if people want to have it, they can go ahead and do so, bit don't comdemn others and accuse them of being killers, anti vaxxers etc for exercising their right to choose. If you are referring to speed of development of the mRNA vaccine. This type of vaccine has been in development for decades not just a single year. Any possible side effects are now well understood as trials have been carried out on 10’s of thousands of people over the years. The difference is that with COVID-19 vast sums of money and people have been thrown at it to isolate the right part of the virus to create a targeted mRNA response. Rather than a small group of researchers continually scrabbling for funding. No one will be forcing you to have the vaccine it will still be your freedom of choice. Though like everything in this life each choice has it’s consequences whether you like it or not. Some professions have a mandatory requirement to be Hepatitis B vaccinated and have seroconversion otherwise you cannot work in that area. It maybe a Hobson’s choice but it’s still a choice. It's all about the dual responsibility of protecting you from others and others from you. Sounds interesting. If it was moved that if a person decided not to take up the option of any of the vaccines that are approved, then a list of what they can do or not should be available. As you said, some professionals have a mandatory injection otherwise the can't work in a certain area. That is understandable so, therefore list the areas of prohibited things the anti vaxxers will face if they don't have the injection. They can then make an informed decision whether the prohibited areas of life are worth missing out on. " Once again, the use of the term anti vaxxer. I have not said at any point I am anti vax. I am pro choice and just don't want this one. Please do not tar us all with the same brush. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I won't be having it, I'm concerned about the speed of which it's been rushed through, drug companies aren't liable for side affects and the fact that it's only up to 90% effective when the recovery rate for covid is at least 98%, and I think ive probably had it earlier this year anyway. By all means, if people want to have it, they can go ahead and do so, bit don't comdemn others and accuse them of being killers, anti vaxxers etc for exercising their right to choose. If you are referring to speed of development of the mRNA vaccine. This type of vaccine has been in development for decades not just a single year. Any possible side effects are now well understood as trials have been carried out on 10’s of thousands of people over the years. The difference is that with COVID-19 vast sums of money and people have been thrown at it to isolate the right part of the virus to create a targeted mRNA response. Rather than a small group of researchers continually scrabbling for funding. No one will be forcing you to have the vaccine it will still be your freedom of choice. Though like everything in this life each choice has it’s consequences whether you like it or not. Some professions have a mandatory requirement to be Hepatitis B vaccinated and have seroconversion otherwise you cannot work in that area. It maybe a Hobson’s choice but it’s still a choice. It's all about the dual responsibility of protecting you from others and others from you. Sounds interesting. If it was moved that if a person decided not to take up the option of any of the vaccines that are approved, then a list of what they can do or not should be available. As you said, some professionals have a mandatory injection otherwise the can't work in a certain area. That is understandable so, therefore list the areas of prohibited things the anti vaxxers will face if they don't have the injection. They can then make an informed decision whether the prohibited areas of life are worth missing out on. Once again, the use of the term anti vaxxer. I have not said at any point I am anti vax. I am pro choice and just don't want this one. Please do not tar us all with the same brush. " Sorry, I didn't point my reply at you personally and I agree with choice. I was merely picking up on the point that you raised rather than answering and people didn't understand a disjointed reply. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I won't be having it, I'm concerned about the speed of which it's been rushed through, drug companies aren't liable for side affects and the fact that it's only up to 90% effective when the recovery rate for covid is at least 98%, and I think ive probably had it earlier this year anyway. By all means, if people want to have it, they can go ahead and do so, bit don't comdemn others and accuse them of being killers, anti vaxxers etc for exercising their right to choose. If you are referring to speed of development of the mRNA vaccine. This type of vaccine has been in development for decades not just a single year. Any possible side effects are now well understood as trials have been carried out on 10’s of thousands of people over the years. The difference is that with COVID-19 vast sums of money and people have been thrown at it to isolate the right part of the virus to create a targeted mRNA response. Rather than a small group of researchers continually scrabbling for funding. No one will be forcing you to have the vaccine it will still be your freedom of choice. Though like everything in this life each choice has it’s consequences whether you like it or not. Some professions have a mandatory requirement to be Hepatitis B vaccinated and have seroconversion otherwise you cannot work in that area. It maybe a Hobson’s choice but it’s still a choice. It's all about the dual responsibility of protecting you from others and others from you. Sounds interesting. If it was moved that if a person decided not to take up the option of any of the vaccines that are approved, then a list of what they can do or not should be available. As you said, some professionals have a mandatory injection otherwise the can't work in a certain area. That is understandable so, therefore list the areas of prohibited things the anti vaxxers will face if they don't have the injection. They can then make an informed decision whether the prohibited areas of life are worth missing out on. Once again, the use of the term anti vaxxer. I have not said at any point I am anti vax. I am pro choice and just don't want this one. Please do not tar us all with the same brush. Sorry, I didn't point my reply at you personally and I agree with choice. I was merely picking up on the point that you raised rather than answering and people didn't understand a disjointed reply. " . Thankyou. X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not sure if this has been mentioned.... but the no liability clause which has been passed as law is a concern.... no liability for drug company or government...... anyone remember thalidomide???" You do know that that was not caused by a vaccine??? I think science has moved on since the 1950,s too.I cant believe people still think like this,the drug affected the fetus in pregnant women looking at you i dont think you will be having that problem being a guy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone refusing vac should be ashamed....if we all do this then we can get back to a normal life quicker" Why, please explain | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |