FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Compulsory vaccination by any other name
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. " Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. " Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. " Can't see anyone needing a vaccine passport in pubs restaurants and cinemas. Football grounds maybe initially but i doubt long term. I can definitely see you needing it for international travel. Governments and airlines will insist on it. They do for other vaccinations so why not. Just in the uk if enough people get vaccinated quickly enough it will protect everyone even the anti vaxx freeriders. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. " No just don't go to the places mentioned until the virus is out of the way. On the other hand it is strange immunity passports are mentioned as no-one yet knows if a person who has been vaccinated has immunity or not, they still do not know for certain if someone who has had covid-19 has any immunity but there are suggestions some may have up to 6 months so far | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison." Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself." somebody get that on a billboard | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself." yes! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. somebody get that on a billboard" Double yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. " I'm studying Criminology at the moment and that is one of the concepts "You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself." Yeah, but.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. I'm studying Criminology at the moment and that is one of the concepts "You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility"" Ah I studied philosophy and this was also covered... "With great power there must also come great responsibility" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Can't see anyone needing a vaccine passport in pubs restaurants and cinemas. Football grounds maybe initially but i doubt long term. I can definitely see you needing it for international travel. Governments and airlines will insist on it. They do for other vaccinations so why not. Just in the uk if enough people get vaccinated quickly enough it will protect everyone even the anti vaxx freeriders." You could well be right and not just the UK. I can see popular holiday countries making it a pre condition | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies." Well people have tried to argue in court that euthanasia should be allowed, and it's never worked. They sure as hell aren't going to accept an argument about restrictions designed to protect others. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And much like track and trace most places won’t bother with checking it, employers will insist that staff don’t install/use it " I'd expect a new law to be introduced to cover that eventuality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Well people have tried to argue in court that euthanasia should be allowed, and it's never worked. They sure as hell aren't going to accept an argument about restrictions designed to protect others." Freedom of choice vs State control of people's bodies. It's a slightly different argument to assisted suicide. Using that logic though, why isn't the flu jab compulsory? Or should that be included in the Immunity Passport too? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Deffinatly hope we have health passports. I for one don't want to sit next to a virus riddled idiot " If you have had the vaccine it wont be a problem will it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Deffinatly hope we have health passports. I for one don't want to sit next to a virus riddled idiot " You wouldn’t know that the individuals around you had been definitely vaccinated, as some will be exempt for medical reasons and not ‘idiots’ as you so eloquently put it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They do no, being vaccinated doesn't guarantee immunity, right? " I don’t think some of them do, but then again nor do the scientists know for sure yet or how long it lasts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Well people have tried to argue in court that euthanasia should be allowed, and it's never worked. They sure as hell aren't going to accept an argument about restrictions designed to protect others. Freedom of choice vs State control of people's bodies. It's a slightly different argument to assisted suicide. " Freedom of choice has limitations when it impacts the greater society. Nobody is removing your 'freedom' not to have a vaccination, but restrictions on your activities could be a price that you, not the rest of us, could potentially have to live with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Well people have tried to argue in court that euthanasia should be allowed, and it's never worked. They sure as hell aren't going to accept an argument about restrictions designed to protect others. Freedom of choice vs State control of people's bodies. It's a slightly different argument to assisted suicide. Freedom of choice has limitations when it impacts the greater society. Nobody is removing your 'freedom' not to have a vaccination, but restrictions on your activities could be a price that you, not the rest of us, could potentially have to live with. " Those restrictions could potentially cost people their jobs (in certain industries). Using those criteria, why is the flu jab not included in the Immunity passport? There is no guarantee that immunisation will be successful and no guarantee that it will be safe in the long term (side effects etc). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. " I agree with him 100% and you can be pretty certain that if you want a holiday you will need proof of vaccination to get on a plane before long. At last some sense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a choice that you are freely able to take. As always, review the evidence and understand the context that you are within. Until anything is in law, you are not bohndaried, unless your mind does that to you. Travel has a long history of vaccination requirements. We can all do our various parts in making the UK safer again. As the country becomes safer, we can also help to rebuild the economy. Assorted restrictions will continue until we're a safe enough country again. We voted for these people in to lead us to , so we live with the consequences " Thank god we voted Boris in that is all I can say could you imagine Corbyn in charge very very scary | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Deffinatly hope we have health passports. I for one don't want to sit next to a virus riddled idiot You wouldn’t know that the individuals around you had been definitely vaccinated, as some will be exempt for medical reasons and not ‘idiots’ as you so eloquently put it " You are quite right. Two or three out of a hundred might not be able to have a vaccine, I'll take my chances. But I still don't want anti vaxxers next to me. It seems like there's quite a few of em | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. " Wow who'd have thought, something that keeps us safe and economies running. Nooo not for me I'd rather moan about something. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Those restrictions could potentially cost people their jobs (in certain industries). " Well that's something for those who decide to exercise their 'freedom' to consider. " Using those criteria, why is the flu jab not included in the Immunity passport? " It might well be, as this is only the beginning of the conversation there's no reason why that shouldn't be added. " There is no guarantee that immunisation will be successful and no guarantee that it will be safe in the long term (side effects etc). " Well don't have it then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Those restrictions could potentially cost people their jobs (in certain industries). Well that's something for those who decide to exercise their 'freedom' to consider. " And presumably for their employers to retrospectively alter their contracts of employment? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Those restrictions could potentially cost people their jobs (in certain industries). Well that's something for those who decide to exercise their 'freedom' to consider. And presumably for their employers to retrospectively alter their contracts of employment? " That's common practice already. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Deffinatly hope we have health passports. I for one don't want to sit next to a virus riddled idiot If you have had the vaccine it wont be a problem will it" That's just the problem. A lot of people seem to think that if they don't have the vaccine and rely on others to have it the virus will dissappear and we won't have to worry. The reality is that if not enough people have the vaccine we won't get herd immunity - or at least not for a very long time and everyone will still be at risk even some of those that have been vaccinated as no coaching is 100% effective. The only way we are going to defeat this virus is by enough of us being vaccinated. If not we will still be living like we are now in 5 years time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies." Why is it ‘sinister’ ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? " That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body." No they don’t, it will be private companies , airlines, pubs, cinemas, etc etc who will make that decision. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies." x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body." Governments have always had that ability. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body." Quite a few countries already demand a pcr rest before they let you in, I'd imagine they might consider vaccination instead ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. " Still a choice KnucklePuck Just one some people wont like. If you opt out of the vaccine then you opt out of society. Its called the social contract | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. " It is your choice but the chances are that if you want to go abroad to a lot of countries in the next few years you will need to prove you have been vaccinated. Most of these 'antivaxers' will soon change their minds when they realise that they can't have their two weeks in Benidorm! Like it or not there will be a lot of pressure from all areas to encourage people to be vaccinated. The travel and hospitality industries for example know that without a high percentage of people being vaccinated this virus will destroy there business for years to come. I can see airlines and even travel companies requesting proof of vaccination. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body." Next you will be saying that it’s all a secret plot by Bill Gates to inject us with microchips.... Vaccination will not be mandatory by the UK government. Travel and areas of society might make it a necessity. However you have the free choice to decide to be vaccinated or not and accept the choices that come with your decision. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body. No they don’t, it will be private companies , airlines, pubs, cinemas, etc etc who will make that decision. " No it won't... It will be the insurance companies cos if you catch it at the cinema you will sue them. One o the main reasons large entertainment spaces are closed is they can't get insurance. Same as trying to get travel insurance to China or India. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body. Next you will be saying that it’s all a secret plot by Bill Gates to inject us with microchips.... Vaccination will not be mandatory by the UK government. Travel and areas of society might make it a necessity. However you have the free choice to decide to be vaccinated or not and accept the choices that come with your decision. " So what if you life insurance companies request it as conditions of renewals. And life insurance is linked to a mortgage. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body. Next you will be saying that it’s all a secret plot by Bill Gates to inject us with microchips.... Vaccination will not be mandatory by the UK government. Travel and areas of society might make it a necessity. However you have the free choice to decide to be vaccinated or not and accept the choices that come with your decision. So what if you life insurance companies request it as conditions of renewals. And life insurance is linked to a mortgage." Then you accept this as the T&C’s of having a mortgage, life insuranc, etc.... If you don’t like it sell up cancel your life insurance and live off grid but without being a burden on the rest of society. Basically put your money where your mouth is. It’s about the benefit of society not selfish individualism that you are seeming promoting Nothing sinister at all. Just individuals trying to have it all without taking any responsibility | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx" Not sure what you point is ..... Are you saying that nobody should be vaccinated because a few are not abe to be ??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx Not sure what you point is ..... Are you saying that nobody should be vaccinated because a few are not abe to be ???" No what I'm saying is that you can't just limit people freedom based on if they have or haven't had a vaccine. You need to be more flexible and tolerant. Oh and before you say I'm not an antivaxxer and trust me I'm more fed up of this virus that any of you can ever possibly be | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx" Why would immunosupressed people be flying abroad during a pandemic? How wouod they get insurance? Why would they be in a pub during a pandemic? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself." So. . Much. . This. E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body. Next you will be saying that it’s all a secret plot by Bill Gates to inject us with microchips.... Vaccination will not be mandatory by the UK government. Travel and areas of society might make it a necessity. However you have the free choice to decide to be vaccinated or not and accept the choices that come with your decision. So what if you life insurance companies request it as conditions of renewals. And life insurance is linked to a mortgage. Then you accept this as the T&C’s of having a mortgage, life insuranc, etc.... If you don’t like it sell up cancel your life insurance and live off grid but without being a burden on the rest of society. Basically put your money where your mouth is. It’s about the benefit of society not selfish individualism that you are seeming promoting Nothing sinister at all. Just individuals trying to have it all without taking any responsibility " No I'm all for it I'll be at the front of that que when it's my turn. I live almost isolated to avoid catching it and not being able to work so more the happy to have it.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx Why would immunosupressed people be flying abroad during a pandemic? How wouod they get insurance? Why would they be in a pub during a pandemic? " Maybe because this pandemic might be forever? We have been having flu epidemics and pandemics every single year since 1918 and quite possibly this is the new flu. What do you want them to do? Isolate as soon as they get a cancer diagnosed for example? As I said on my comment you need to be flexible and more tolerant. Oh by the way I have had 6 b hepatitis vaccines and still not developed any immunity. A vaccine does not warrantee immunity as the media is making it look like. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx Not sure what you point is ..... Are you saying that nobody should be vaccinated because a few are not abe to be ??? No what I'm saying is that you can't just limit people freedom based on if they have or haven't had a vaccine. You need to be more flexible and tolerant. Oh and before you say I'm not an antivaxxer and trust me I'm more fed up of this virus that any of you can ever possibly be" We are not I don't know but I would guess if you have had a lung transplant your travel insurance is expensive so insurance companies are all ready in control. Is that not a restriction on liberty all ready?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx Not sure what you point is ..... Are you saying that nobody should be vaccinated because a few are not abe to be ??? No what I'm saying is that you can't just limit people freedom based on if they have or haven't had a vaccine. You need to be more flexible and tolerant. Oh and before you say I'm not an antivaxxer and trust me I'm more fed up of this virus that any of you can ever possibly be We are not I don't know but I would guess if you have had a lung transplant your travel insurance is expensive so insurance companies are all ready in control. Is that not a restriction on liberty all ready?? " Well you can travel with no insurance can't you? I have never used travel insurance and here I am. And well I have met quite a lot of people inmunosupressed and they still have a life you know? They still go to the cinema go on holidays go to the pub and restaurants. They have had a transplant to live not to stay home "safe". They have cancer and want to live not stay inbetween 4 walls afraid of what might happen to them if they leave the house don't you think? Should we lock you up if you develop one of these illnesses in case you get the flu and ban you from travelling or doing other things? Anyway I don't expect you to understand it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow who'd have thought, something that keeps us safe and economies running. Nooo not for me I'd rather moan about something. " I'm not moaning pal, let me just grab the crayons to explain... UK government We will NOT make it compulsory!! UK government we will stop you from your general freedom if you don't have the vaccine. UK government the decision is completely yours. You want freedom so to speak have the vaccine if you don't expect to wear mask, loose your job, not go out to venues or events.... Best have the vaccine then. It's not freedom of choice it's compulsory my any other name. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx Not sure what you point is ..... Are you saying that nobody should be vaccinated because a few are not abe to be ??? No what I'm saying is that you can't just limit people freedom based on if they have or haven't had a vaccine. You need to be more flexible and tolerant. Oh and before you say I'm not an antivaxxer and trust me I'm more fed up of this virus that any of you can ever possibly be We are not I don't know but I would guess if you have had a lung transplant your travel insurance is expensive so insurance companies are all ready in control. Is that not a restriction on liberty all ready?? Well you can travel with no insurance can't you? I have never used travel insurance and here I am. And well I have met quite a lot of people inmunosupressed and they still have a life you know? They still go to the cinema go on holidays go to the pub and restaurants. They have had a transplant to live not to stay home "safe". They have cancer and want to live not stay inbetween 4 walls afraid of what might happen to them if they leave the house don't you think? Should we lock you up if you develop one of these illnesses in case you get the flu and ban you from travelling or doing other things? Anyway I don't expect you to understand it. " I have dealings with insurance and any travel espesaly flight with out insurance is in my opinion just mad as it could cost you so much. The wife is a repat medic do you know what it can cost to get you home if you get unwell. Let alone have a hart attack or die on a plane... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A vaccine does not warrantee immunity as the media is making it look like. " No they're not. The media are quoting the efficacy stated by the manufacturers which has ranged between 65% and 90% depending on the vaccine and dosage. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx Not sure what you point is ..... Are you saying that nobody should be vaccinated because a few are not abe to be ??? No what I'm saying is that you can't just limit people freedom based on if they have or haven't had a vaccine. You need to be more flexible and tolerant. Oh and before you say I'm not an antivaxxer and trust me I'm more fed up of this virus that any of you can ever possibly be We are not I don't know but I would guess if you have had a lung transplant your travel insurance is expensive so insurance companies are all ready in control. Is that not a restriction on liberty all ready?? Well you can travel with no insurance can't you? I have never used travel insurance and here I am. And well I have met quite a lot of people inmunosupressed and they still have a life you know? They still go to the cinema go on holidays go to the pub and restaurants. They have had a transplant to live not to stay home "safe". They have cancer and want to live not stay inbetween 4 walls afraid of what might happen to them if they leave the house don't you think? Should we lock you up if you develop one of these illnesses in case you get the flu and ban you from travelling or doing other things? Anyway I don't expect you to understand it. " I agree with you completely. I know people with no immune system and by their accounts you wouldn't be allowed to have any freedom. If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx Not sure what you point is ..... Are you saying that nobody should be vaccinated because a few are not abe to be ??? No what I'm saying is that you can't just limit people freedom based on if they have or haven't had a vaccine. You need to be more flexible and tolerant. Oh and before you say I'm not an antivaxxer and trust me I'm more fed up of this virus that any of you can ever possibly be We are not I don't know but I would guess if you have had a lung transplant your travel insurance is expensive so insurance companies are all ready in control. Is that not a restriction on liberty all ready?? Well you can travel with no insurance can't you? I have never used travel insurance and here I am. And well I have met quite a lot of people inmunosupressed and they still have a life you know? They still go to the cinema go on holidays go to the pub and restaurants. They have had a transplant to live not to stay home "safe". They have cancer and want to live not stay inbetween 4 walls afraid of what might happen to them if they leave the house don't you think? Should we lock you up if you develop one of these illnesses in case you get the flu and ban you from travelling or doing other things? Anyway I don't expect you to understand it. " So do you have a fit to fly... And I guess you can drive with out insurance so long as you have a bond of oh I think it's now 5 billion to self insure as do some large companies | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself." Nailed it. If you want to get the benefits of society, you've got to contribute. The price of contribution right now should be vaccination (naturally with allowances made for those who are medically exempt). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this goes ahead, I would really like to know if they are going to give you the vaccine and then test you for immunity? It's very well having your documents stamped to say you've been immunised, but it doesn't mean you are actually immune" I think it's highly unlikely as it would both cost and divert resources away from vaccinating the millions of others here. An antibody test could reveal some of your potential immunity but T cell tests are more expensive and unlikely to be available outside of research operations. The best we can have will be herd immunity, from sufficient high density of the population who have it. Repeat vaccinations may be needed too but we'll need the first round kicked off before we think of this. Perhaps people will get them before winter, with flu jabs, as the winter will be an easier time for both to spread. Individually people will hope they have immunity and trust that enough other people have it too. I'm guessing that some parts of the world will be slower to bring it under control and so we'll need to maintain immunity for several years at least. If we continue with high uptake of the flu jab and both are given at the same time, we'll think less about it, as time passes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) " Not being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic, so as far as 'rights' are concerned, none are being broken. All privately owned premises (pubs, clubs, shops etc.) have always been within their rights to refuse admittance anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body. No they don’t, it will be private companies , airlines, pubs, cinemas, etc etc who will make that decision. No it won't... It will be the insurance companies cos if you catch it at the cinema you will sue them. One o the main reasons large entertainment spaces are closed is they can't get insurance. Same as trying to get travel insurance to China or India." You try ‘proving’ you caught the virus at a cinema , it would be impossible . Nobody will be forced to take a vaccine, but quite rightly this ‘choice’ will have certain consequences. As many posters have already pointed out, there are numerous rules that have to be adhered to when travelling etc, having a vaccine will be another | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx" They will be the people who will gain from others' willingness to get it, so that we have herd immunity. An official covid safe approval could denote both those who are unable to have it as well as those who have had it. This discussion here is only due to a government minister sharing his initial thoughts, s day or so into the job. We don't know what they and other governments will establish, nor what private businesses etc will implement. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx They will be the people who will gain from others' willingness to get it, so that we have herd immunity. An official covid safe approval could denote both those who are unable to have it as well as those who have had it. This discussion here is only due to a government minister sharing his initial thoughts, s day or so into the job. We don't know what they and other governments will establish, nor what private businesses etc will implement. " So glad to find someone that understands what I am saying and has some common sense. Thank you! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx They will be the people who will gain from others' willingness to get it, so that we have herd immunity. An official covid safe approval could denote both those who are unable to have it as well as those who have had it. This discussion here is only due to a government minister sharing his initial thoughts, s day or so into the job. We don't know what they and other governments will establish, nor what private businesses etc will implement. So glad to find someone that understands what I am saying and has some common sense. Thank you! " So I guess you a risk taker I assume you buy travel we do mean out of the UK And probably out of Europe... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) Not being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic, so as far as 'rights' are concerned, none are being broken. All privately owned premises (pubs, clubs, shops etc.) have always been within their rights to refuse admittance anyway. " You're right not being vaccinated isn't a protected right, but freely being allowed to visit a cinema is going the pub is etc. No pub, club, cinema has turn a customer away due to them not being vaccinated because it's never had to happen before but if the government decides that you will receive immunity passports to allow entrance to said places then that is not on the venue's is it !? Last year you were allowed to go where you wanted without passports/certificates but if the government said no entry without the flu vaccine would that be your decision or compulsory ?? You want to go places I assume you will have to have it but for whatever reason you really don't want it (could be any reason religious, anti etc) you wouldn't be allowed so I'll repeat again if this is to go ahead for whatever reason, jobs, holidays, venues then it would basically become compulsory. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) Not being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic, so as far as 'rights' are concerned, none are being broken. All privately owned premises (pubs, clubs, shops etc.) have always been within their rights to refuse admittance anyway. You're right not being vaccinated isn't a protected right, but freely being allowed to visit a cinema is going the pub is etc. No pub, club, cinema has turn a customer away due to them not being vaccinated because it's never had to happen before but if the government decides that you will receive immunity passports to allow entrance to said places then that is not on the venue's is it !? Last year you were allowed to go where you wanted without passports/certificates but if the government said no entry without the flu vaccine would that be your decision or compulsory ?? You want to go places I assume you will have to have it but for whatever reason you really don't want it (could be any reason religious, anti etc) you wouldn't be allowed so I'll repeat again if this is to go ahead for whatever reason, jobs, holidays, venues then it would basically become compulsory." Last year we weren't in the middle of a pandemic so your comparison is a little unbalanced. If you don't want to be vaccinated, exercise your right not to have it, but there may be possible consequences that fall well outside of those rights. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) Not being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic, so as far as 'rights' are concerned, none are being broken. All privately owned premises (pubs, clubs, shops etc.) have always been within their rights to refuse admittance anyway. You're right not being vaccinated isn't a protected right, but freely being allowed to visit a cinema is going the pub is etc. No pub, club, cinema has turn a customer away due to them not being vaccinated because it's never had to happen before but if the government decides that you will receive immunity passports to allow entrance to said places then that is not on the venue's is it !? Last year you were allowed to go where you wanted without passports/certificates but if the government said no entry without the flu vaccine would that be your decision or compulsory ?? You want to go places I assume you will have to have it but for whatever reason you really don't want it (could be any reason religious, anti etc) you wouldn't be allowed so I'll repeat again if this is to go ahead for whatever reason, jobs, holidays, venues then it would basically become compulsory. Last year we weren't in the middle of a pandemic so your comparison is a little unbalanced. If you don't want to be vaccinated, exercise your right not to have it, but there may be possible consequences that fall well outside of those rights." How is it unbalanced when I'm using a what if scenario ? If we never had this current situation and it was a bad flu year eg 2014/2015 when 47,000 people died did we have talks about immunity passports NO (I completely understand this is different etc) If you want to attend a place/venue etc you can only do so with vaccination this would basically make it compulsory I can't make it any simpler for you. I haven't onced said I won't be vaccinated but if I choose not too then I must face the consequences really ? Sorry but in my humble opinion you're wrong we shouldn't face consequences we should be able to choose to be vaccinated not told if you don't you won't be allowed and so on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) Not being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic, so as far as 'rights' are concerned, none are being broken. All privately owned premises (pubs, clubs, shops etc.) have always been within their rights to refuse admittance anyway. You're right not being vaccinated isn't a protected right, but freely being allowed to visit a cinema is going the pub is etc. No pub, club, cinema has turn a customer away due to them not being vaccinated because it's never had to happen before but if the government decides that you will receive immunity passports to allow entrance to said places then that is not on the venue's is it !? Last year you were allowed to go where you wanted without passports/certificates but if the government said no entry without the flu vaccine would that be your decision or compulsory ?? You want to go places I assume you will have to have it but for whatever reason you really don't want it (could be any reason religious, anti etc) you wouldn't be allowed so I'll repeat again if this is to go ahead for whatever reason, jobs, holidays, venues then it would basically become compulsory. Last year we weren't in the middle of a pandemic so your comparison is a little unbalanced. If you don't want to be vaccinated, exercise your right not to have it, but there may be possible consequences that fall well outside of those rights. How is it unbalanced when I'm using a what if scenario ? If we never had this current situation and it was a bad flu year eg 2014/2015 when 47,000 people died did we have talks about immunity passports NO (I completely understand this is different etc) If you want to attend a place/venue etc you can only do so with vaccination this would basically make it compulsory I can't make it any simpler for you. I haven't onced said I won't be vaccinated but if I choose not too then I must face the consequences really ? Sorry but in my humble opinion you're wrong we shouldn't face consequences we should be able to choose to be vaccinated not told if you don't you won't be allowed and so on " You understand Flu is different to covid, but you're the one who keeps bringing it up? You can choose wether to be vaccinated or not, but as I said, simply, there may be consequences. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) Not being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic, so as far as 'rights' are concerned, none are being broken. All privately owned premises (pubs, clubs, shops etc.) have always been within their rights to refuse admittance anyway. You're right not being vaccinated isn't a protected right, but freely being allowed to visit a cinema is going the pub is etc. No pub, club, cinema has turn a customer away due to them not being vaccinated because it's never had to happen before but if the government decides that you will receive immunity passports to allow entrance to said places then that is not on the venue's is it !? Last year you were allowed to go where you wanted without passports/certificates but if the government said no entry without the flu vaccine would that be your decision or compulsory ?? You want to go places I assume you will have to have it but for whatever reason you really don't want it (could be any reason religious, anti etc) you wouldn't be allowed so I'll repeat again if this is to go ahead for whatever reason, jobs, holidays, venues then it would basically become compulsory. Last year we weren't in the middle of a pandemic so your comparison is a little unbalanced. If you don't want to be vaccinated, exercise your right not to have it, but there may be possible consequences that fall well outside of those rights. How is it unbalanced when I'm using a what if scenario ? If we never had this current situation and it was a bad flu year eg 2014/2015 when 47,000 people died did we have talks about immunity passports NO (I completely understand this is different etc) If you want to attend a place/venue etc you can only do so with vaccination this would basically make it compulsory I can't make it any simpler for you. I haven't onced said I won't be vaccinated but if I choose not too then I must face the consequences really ? Sorry but in my humble opinion you're wrong we shouldn't face consequences we should be able to choose to be vaccinated not told if you don't you won't be allowed and so on You understand Flu is different to covid, but you're the one who keeps bringing it up? You can choose wether to be vaccinated or not, but as I said, simply, there may be consequences. " Using travel as one example. There are some travel requirements already for other diseases for some countries. Not sure why such drama about needing a covid vaccination to travel. Like the other requirements either you have it and can travel to said destination. or don't have it and you can't travel. The reason some countries already insist for some diseases is they don't want travellers bringing it in and starting a local epidemic. This is not a new concept with covid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Deffinatly hope we have health passports. I for one don't want to sit next to a virus riddled idiot If you have had the vaccine it wont be a problem will it That's just the problem. A lot of people seem to think that if they don't have the vaccine and rely on others to have it the virus will dissappear and we won't have to worry. The reality is that if not enough people have the vaccine we won't get herd immunity - or at least not for a very long time and everyone will still be at risk even some of those that have been vaccinated as no coaching is 100% effective. The only way we are going to defeat this virus is by enough of us being vaccinated. If not we will still be living like we are now in 5 years time." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) Not being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic, so as far as 'rights' are concerned, none are being broken. All privately owned premises (pubs, clubs, shops etc.) have always been within their rights to refuse admittance anyway. You're right not being vaccinated isn't a protected right, but freely being allowed to visit a cinema is going the pub is etc. No pub, club, cinema has turn a customer away due to them not being vaccinated because it's never had to happen before but if the government decides that you will receive immunity passports to allow entrance to said places then that is not on the venue's is it !? Last year you were allowed to go where you wanted without passports/certificates but if the government said no entry without the flu vaccine would that be your decision or compulsory ?? You want to go places I assume you will have to have it but for whatever reason you really don't want it (could be any reason religious, anti etc) you wouldn't be allowed so I'll repeat again if this is to go ahead for whatever reason, jobs, holidays, venues then it would basically become compulsory. Last year we weren't in the middle of a pandemic so your comparison is a little unbalanced. If you don't want to be vaccinated, exercise your right not to have it, but there may be possible consequences that fall well outside of those rights. How is it unbalanced when I'm using a what if scenario ? If we never had this current situation and it was a bad flu year eg 2014/2015 when 47,000 people died did we have talks about immunity passports NO (I completely understand this is different etc) If you want to attend a place/venue etc you can only do so with vaccination this would basically make it compulsory I can't make it any simpler for you. I haven't onced said I won't be vaccinated but if I choose not too then I must face the consequences really ? Sorry but in my humble opinion you're wrong we shouldn't face consequences we should be able to choose to be vaccinated not told if you don't you won't be allowed and so on You understand Flu is different to covid, but you're the one who keeps bringing it up? You can choose wether to be vaccinated or not, but as I said, simply, there may be consequences. Using travel as one example. There are some travel requirements already for other diseases for some countries. Not sure why such drama about needing a covid vaccination to travel. Like the other requirements either you have it and can travel to said destination. or don't have it and you can't travel. The reason some countries already insist for some diseases is they don't want travellers bringing it in and starting a local epidemic. This is not a new concept with covid. " Agree with this.... But also employer will have to protect employees so you might need it to go to a pub... as the employer has a duty of care... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) Not being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic, so as far as 'rights' are concerned, none are being broken. All privately owned premises (pubs, clubs, shops etc.) have always been within their rights to refuse admittance anyway. You're right not being vaccinated isn't a protected right, but freely being allowed to visit a cinema is going the pub is etc. No pub, club, cinema has turn a customer away due to them not being vaccinated because it's never had to happen before but if the government decides that you will receive immunity passports to allow entrance to said places then that is not on the venue's is it !? Last year you were allowed to go where you wanted without passports/certificates but if the government said no entry without the flu vaccine would that be your decision or compulsory ?? You want to go places I assume you will have to have it but for whatever reason you really don't want it (could be any reason religious, anti etc) you wouldn't be allowed so I'll repeat again if this is to go ahead for whatever reason, jobs, holidays, venues then it would basically become compulsory. Last year we weren't in the middle of a pandemic so your comparison is a little unbalanced. If you don't want to be vaccinated, exercise your right not to have it, but there may be possible consequences that fall well outside of those rights. How is it unbalanced when I'm using a what if scenario ? If we never had this current situation and it was a bad flu year eg 2014/2015 when 47,000 people died did we have talks about immunity passports NO (I completely understand this is different etc) If you want to attend a place/venue etc you can only do so with vaccination this would basically make it compulsory I can't make it any simpler for you. I haven't onced said I won't be vaccinated but if I choose not too then I must face the consequences really ? Sorry but in my humble opinion you're wrong we shouldn't face consequences we should be able to choose to be vaccinated not told if you don't you won't be allowed and so on You understand Flu is different to covid, but you're the one who keeps bringing it up? You can choose wether to be vaccinated or not, but as I said, simply, there may be consequences. Using travel as one example. There are some travel requirements already for other diseases for some countries. Not sure why such drama about needing a covid vaccination to travel. Like the other requirements either you have it and can travel to said destination. or don't have it and you can't travel. The reason some countries already insist for some diseases is they don't want travellers bringing it in and starting a local epidemic. This is not a new concept with covid. " This. ^ It's not rocket science, I really don't understand why people are getting their panties in a bunch. Have the jab or don't have the jab. Choose, either way. But accept there are likely consequences if you elect not to have it. People are whining and whingeing about lockdown, when will it end? Now we have a potential solution to that conundrum and they don't want to take it. Fuckwittery at it's higher end. E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If they were to say that if you hadn't had the flu vaccine you couldn't come in or wasn't allowed to attend because you wasn't vaccinated how many people would be saying it's against my rights etc (and before anyone moans I know it's not like the flu virus) Not being vaccinated isn't a protected characteristic, so as far as 'rights' are concerned, none are being broken. All privately owned premises (pubs, clubs, shops etc.) have always been within their rights to refuse admittance anyway. You're right not being vaccinated isn't a protected right, but freely being allowed to visit a cinema is going the pub is etc. No pub, club, cinema has turn a customer away due to them not being vaccinated because it's never had to happen before but if the government decides that you will receive immunity passports to allow entrance to said places then that is not on the venue's is it !? Last year you were allowed to go where you wanted without passports/certificates but if the government said no entry without the flu vaccine would that be your decision or compulsory ?? You want to go places I assume you will have to have it but for whatever reason you really don't want it (could be any reason religious, anti etc) you wouldn't be allowed so I'll repeat again if this is to go ahead for whatever reason, jobs, holidays, venues then it would basically become compulsory. Last year we weren't in the middle of a pandemic so your comparison is a little unbalanced. If you don't want to be vaccinated, exercise your right not to have it, but there may be possible consequences that fall well outside of those rights. How is it unbalanced when I'm using a what if scenario ? If we never had this current situation and it was a bad flu year eg 2014/2015 when 47,000 people died did we have talks about immunity passports NO (I completely understand this is different etc) If you want to attend a place/venue etc you can only do so with vaccination this would basically make it compulsory I can't make it any simpler for you. I haven't onced said I won't be vaccinated but if I choose not too then I must face the consequences really ? Sorry but in my humble opinion you're wrong we shouldn't face consequences we should be able to choose to be vaccinated not told if you don't you won't be allowed and so on You understand Flu is different to covid, but you're the one who keeps bringing it up? You can choose wether to be vaccinated or not, but as I said, simply, there may be consequences. Using travel as one example. There are some travel requirements already for other diseases for some countries. Not sure why such drama about needing a covid vaccination to travel. Like the other requirements either you have it and can travel to said destination. or don't have it and you can't travel. The reason some countries already insist for some diseases is they don't want travellers bringing it in and starting a local epidemic. This is not a new concept with covid. This. ^ It's not rocket science, I really don't understand why people are getting their panties in a bunch. Have the jab or don't have the jab. Choose, either way. But accept there are likely consequences if you elect not to have it. People are whining and whingeing about lockdown, when will it end? Now we have a potential solution to that conundrum and they don't want to take it. Fuckwittery at it's higher end. E " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It won’t happen and this will all die down once Brexit is finally done " Are you being sarcastic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st " I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st " X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You need a yellow fever jab and certificate to go to some African countries. You haven't got one you can't enter .No exceptions. It could be the same with Covid vacination certificates within the UK for swing clubs and sporting events etc. Its not about oneself it's about protecting others. " Maybe, but that’s unusual, can’t recall any country specifically asking for proof of vaccinations on entry. In practice very tricky to do, I actually can’t see many UK restaurants etc enforcing it. We’ve hardly been out, but even in our limited experience this year not every venue has enforced track and trace. No way that hospitality staff are going to get into lengthy conversations with potential customers about their medical histories, privacy etc. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"On this thread people have mentioned pregnant women not being able to get a Jab? So they can't fly. Good news folks! Pregnant women shouldn't be flying anyway. The sooner health passports are required, the better. Why should I have to sit next to someone on a plane, very closely for hours on end, who puts me at risk? Also it wouldn't be a good idea for someone to fly if they have immune problems. I for one, am looking forward to health passports " Someone had better tell the medical profession because lots of pregnant women fly with their say so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You need a yellow fever jab and certificate to go to some African countries. You haven't got one you can't enter .No exceptions. It could be the same with Covid vacination certificates within the UK for swing clubs and sporting events etc. Its not about oneself it's about protecting others. Maybe, but that’s unusual, can’t recall any country specifically asking for proof of vaccinations on entry. In practice very tricky to do, I actually can’t see many UK restaurants etc enforcing it. We’ve hardly been out, but even in our limited experience this year not every venue has enforced track and trace. No way that hospitality staff are going to get into lengthy conversations with potential customers about their medical histories, privacy etc. " That's because the Yellow fever vaccine is to protect you because yellow fever is already in that country. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"On this thread people have mentioned pregnant women not being able to get a Jab? So they can't fly. Good news folks! Pregnant women shouldn't be flying anyway. The sooner health passports are required, the better. Why should I have to sit next to someone on a plane, very closely for hours on end, who puts me at risk? Also it wouldn't be a good idea for someone to fly if they have immune problems. I for one, am looking forward to health passports Someone had better tell the medical profession because lots of pregnant women fly with their say so." No need to tell the medical profession. This problem has been known for decades. Airline's already ban late term pregnant ladies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Deffinatly hope we have health passports. I for one don't want to sit next to a virus riddled idiot You wouldn’t know that the individuals around you had been definitely vaccinated, as some will be exempt for medical reasons and not ‘idiots’ as you so eloquently put it You are quite right. Two or three out of a hundred might not be able to have a vaccine, I'll take my chances. But I still don't want anti vaxxers next to me. It seems like there's quite a few of em " Not everyone who doesn't want this particular vaccine is anti vax. Time to curb the hysteria I think. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. " That won't work, it would be like swingers clubs having to pay out for stds... it just won't happen. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st " Although your post is frankly fucking ridiculous, any government can impose anything on any business, public or private, through legislation. Some of the "stuff" posted on these threads makes me wonder how some people function without a wet nurse. E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You need a yellow fever jab and certificate to go to some African countries. You haven't got one you can't enter .No exceptions. It could be the same with Covid vacination certificates within the UK for swing clubs and sporting events etc. Its not about oneself it's about protecting others. Maybe, but that’s unusual, can’t recall any country specifically asking for proof of vaccinations on entry. In practice very tricky to do, I actually can’t see many UK restaurants etc enforcing it. We’ve hardly been out, but even in our limited experience this year not every venue has enforced track and trace. No way that hospitality staff are going to get into lengthy conversations with potential customers about their medical histories, privacy etc. " I don't see individual restaurants or hospitality venues enforcing anything but without a doubt it will be a requirement to travel to some countries. Australia and New Zealand have both required vaccinations in the past and I suspect they will again. It's going to take a long time for C19 to die down to an 'acceptable' level even with vaccination. If a country has a much lower level of C19 than others they aren't going to allow travel from areas of the world with much higher levels unless travellers have been tested/vaccinated or possibly both. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st Although your post is frankly fucking ridiculous, any government can impose anything on any business, public or private, through legislation. Some of the "stuff" posted on these threads makes me wonder how some people function without a wet nurse. E " Couldn't have said it better myself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. That won't work, it would be like swingers clubs having to pay out for stds... it just won't happen." Are condoms used in clubs? , how much does insurance cost for say, bareback clubs? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st Although your post is frankly fucking ridiculous, any government can impose anything on any business, public or private, through legislation. Some of the "stuff" posted on these threads makes me wonder how some people function without a wet nurse. E Couldn't have said it better myself. " Feel free to copy and paste it. There's no copyright. E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st Although your post is frankly fucking ridiculous, any government can impose anything on any business, public or private, through legislation. Some of the "stuff" posted on these threads makes me wonder how some people function without a wet nurse. E Couldn't have said it better myself. Feel free to copy and paste it. There's no copyright. E" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. That won't work, it would be like swingers clubs having to pay out for stds... it just won't happen. Are condoms used in clubs? , how much does insurance cost for say, bareback clubs? " exactly plus theres complications, what happens if you dont have a mobile phone, or a smart phone, are you not allowed in? what happens if you need the jab every year? then you have the civil rights issue etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"On this thread people have mentioned pregnant women not being able to get a Jab? So they can't fly. Good news folks! Pregnant women shouldn't be flying anyway. The sooner health passports are required, the better. Why should I have to sit next to someone on a plane, very closely for hours on end, who puts me at risk? Also it wouldn't be a good idea for someone to fly if they have immune problems. I for one, am looking forward to health passports " I think you're right. The last 30 years has seen a massive increase in global travel a perfect mechanism for quickly spreading infections to all corners of the world. The amazing thing is that this hasn't happened many times over already. Much better risk management is needed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. That won't work, it would be like swingers clubs having to pay out for stds... it just won't happen. Are condoms used in clubs? , how much does insurance cost for say, bareback clubs? exactly plus theres complications, what happens if you dont have a mobile phone, or a smart phone, are you not allowed in? what happens if you need the jab every year? then you have the civil rights issue etc" To be frank, if a new Jab is needed every year, why not? How many people really don't have access to a smart phone. (not sure what that's got to do with vaccinations) Now Civil rights, come with responsibilities, what about my rights not to be infected by an anti vaxxer sat next to me on a plane? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. That won't work, it would be like swingers clubs having to pay out for stds... it just won't happen. Are condoms used in clubs? , how much does insurance cost for say, bareback clubs? exactly plus theres complications, what happens if you dont have a mobile phone, or a smart phone, are you not allowed in? what happens if you need the jab every year? then you have the civil rights issue etc To be frank, if a new Jab is needed every year, why not? How many people really don't have access to a smart phone. (not sure what that's got to do with vaccinations) Now Civil rights, come with responsibilities, what about my rights not to be infected by an anti vaxxer sat next to me on a plane? " "How many people really don't have access to a smart phone. (not sure what that's got to do with vaccinations)" I think someone mentions a QR code on your phone to say you have been vaccinated. By the way, not all of us not wanting this particular vaccine are anti vaxxers either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. That won't work, it would be like swingers clubs having to pay out for stds... it just won't happen. Are condoms used in clubs? , how much does insurance cost for say, bareback clubs? exactly plus theres complications, what happens if you dont have a mobile phone, or a smart phone, are you not allowed in? what happens if you need the jab every year? then you have the civil rights issue etc To be frank, if a new Jab is needed every year, why not? How many people really don't have access to a smart phone. (not sure what that's got to do with vaccinations) Now Civil rights, come with responsibilities, what about my rights not to be infected by an anti vaxxer sat next to me on a plane? " As you've been vaccinated that's unlikely .. bad example | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It won’t happen and this will all die down once Brexit is finally done " It won't die down once brexit is done but it will certainly lose some of its focus as the goverment concern themselves with thousands of lorries not being allowed into France on a daily basis. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. That won't work, it would be like swingers clubs having to pay out for stds... it just won't happen. Are condoms used in clubs? , how much does insurance cost for say, bareback clubs? exactly plus theres complications, what happens if you dont have a mobile phone, or a smart phone, are you not allowed in? what happens if you need the jab every year? then you have the civil rights issue etc To be frank, if a new Jab is needed every year, why not? How many people really don't have access to a smart phone. (not sure what that's got to do with vaccinations) Now Civil rights, come with responsibilities, what about my rights not to be infected by an anti vaxxer sat next to me on a plane? "How many people really don't have access to a smart phone. (not sure what that's got to do with vaccinations)" I think someone mentions a QR code on your phone to say you have been vaccinated. By the way, not all of us not wanting this particular vaccine are anti vaxxers either. " I've just received my shiny black e-passport. Facial recognition etc, inoculation info can be put on a data base to be accessed by it. So that'd be the modern way to do it.No need for qr codes. As for not being an anti vaxxer, if your Dr, recommended the vaccine to you, and you refuse, that makes an anti-vaxxer in my book. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It won’t happen and this will all die down once Brexit is finally done " What we need is a catchy 3 word saying... Hnmmmm... "get covid done"... If we say it all together 20 times the magic will work. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body. No they don’t, it will be private companies , airlines, pubs, cinemas, etc etc who will make that decision. No it won't... It will be the insurance companies cos if you catch it at the cinema you will sue them. One o the main reasons large entertainment spaces are closed is they can't get insurance. Same as trying to get travel insurance to China or India." Bullshit how can you prove you caught a virus in a specific place | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. That won't work, it would be like swingers clubs having to pay out for stds... it just won't happen. Are condoms used in clubs? , how much does insurance cost for say, bareback clubs? exactly plus theres complications, what happens if you dont have a mobile phone, or a smart phone, are you not allowed in? what happens if you need the jab every year? then you have the civil rights issue etc To be frank, if a new Jab is needed every year, why not? How many people really don't have access to a smart phone. (not sure what that's got to do with vaccinations) Now Civil rights, come with responsibilities, what about my rights not to be infected by an anti vaxxer sat next to me on a plane? As you've been vaccinated that's unlikely .. bad example" As you say, unlikely, but possible... Good example? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. That won't work, it would be like swingers clubs having to pay out for stds... it just won't happen. Are condoms used in clubs? , how much does insurance cost for say, bareback clubs? exactly plus theres complications, what happens if you dont have a mobile phone, or a smart phone, are you not allowed in? what happens if you need the jab every year? then you have the civil rights issue etc To be frank, if a new Jab is needed every year, why not? How many people really don't have access to a smart phone. (not sure what that's got to do with vaccinations) Now Civil rights, come with responsibilities, what about my rights not to be infected by an anti vaxxer sat next to me on a plane? As you've been vaccinated that's unlikely .. bad example As you say, unlikely, but possible... Good example? " I can think of better, but anyway | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. " I totally agree! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'll be interested to see if this is legally challenged and how that goes. I find it slightly sinister that the government seems so keen to take that much control over people's bodies. Why is it ‘sinister’ ? That the government has the power to exclude a person from society for exercising autonomy over their own body. No they don’t, it will be private companies , airlines, pubs, cinemas, etc etc who will make that decision. No it won't... It will be the insurance companies cos if you catch it at the cinema you will sue them. One o the main reasons large entertainment spaces are closed is they can't get insurance. Same as trying to get travel insurance to China or India. Bullshit how can you prove you caught a virus in a specific place " Not into tech, but with e-passports, an infa red temp check whilst doing the facial recognition would be very helpful to add in another layer of safety. So people with a temperature can't get onto planes. Not perfect but deffinatly helpful | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. I totally agree! " And this. I'll be taking a vaccine because I want to do my bit for my society. And I know that vaccines are held to the same - or higher - standards than all the other things that I take for granted are low risk. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hmm wonder if you will need a certificate to goto the supermarket, take away, bank post office etc ... How are they going to enforce it on a private business? Vaccine squad goose stepping down the high st I don't think the government will need to impose a law. Businesses will have to pay a much bigger insurance bill, if they want to allow the un-vaccinated in. No need for scare stories about fictional "goose stepping" vaccine squads. And people wonder where mis-information is coming from from, let's stick to reality please. " Reality right now is, we don't have a vaccine, let alone evidence of a plan of how it may be used in our society and those in our nearest neighbouring countries in the short term or longer term. Anything else is just guess work. However, you'd like to hope that the collective "we" learn some valuable and hard fought lessons from this experience about how to avoid, contain, manage, treat any such future pandemics. Right now it doesn't feel like in this country (OK, in these fora) we have made massive strides. Come on folks, stronger together. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone who refuses a vaccine may invalidate their life insurance if they have been seen to neglect their health It will most certainly be in new policies as will get out clauses for future pandemics ( if not already in small print)" Yes. I'm sure many companies will look to find a way to exclude the expense this disease has brought. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. I totally agree! And this. I'll be taking a vaccine because I want to do my bit for my society. And I know that vaccines are held to the same - or higher - standards than all the other things that I take for granted are low risk." Only a snapshot I know but I personally don't know anyone who will not be accepting the vaccine which is very encouraging. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In mental health... if deemed to have capacity and not on a dols, they can refuse to have the vaccine? I will choose not to have it if offered, preferring to take me chances... it's my right. " Your right, it's your right, don't have it If I own an establishment it's my right to ask if you've had it and my right to refuse you admission you haven't or if you refuse to answer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. I totally agree! And this. I'll be taking a vaccine because I want to do my bit for my society. And I know that vaccines are held to the same - or higher - standards than all the other things that I take for granted are low risk. Only a snapshot I know but I personally don't know anyone who will not be accepting the vaccine which is very encouraging. " That is encouraging. I'm emerging from this wondering how we improve communication on these matters, combat misinformation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think that is highly unlikely " Me too but i did see that there is provision to put on the nhs app whether you have had the jab which could be a way around the so called passport.Show your app before entering that way they could tell if you have been vaccinated or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In mental health... if deemed to have capacity and not on a dols, they can refuse to have the vaccine? I will choose not to have it if offered, preferring to take me chances... it's my right. " Yes me 2 x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think that is highly unlikely Me too but i did see that there is provision to put on the nhs app whether you have had the jab which could be a way around the so called passport.Show your app before entering that way they could tell if you have been vaccinated or not. " Or borrowed someone else's phone.? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think that is highly unlikely Me too but i did see that there is provision to put on the nhs app whether you have had the jab which could be a way around the so called passport.Show your app before entering that way they could tell if you have been vaccinated or not. Or borrowed someone else's phone.? " id be more likely to lend someone my passport than my phone haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So back to my original statement If you don't have it you will have restrictions, if you do you won't that's just another way of saying compulsory. Christ knows why certain people on here don't get it. I never mentioned certain things originally because I know there's restrictions in place especially if your traveling (injections, insurance) but I was very simply saying it's just another way of sugar coating the word compulsory. Apparently you'll have to face consequences if you don't (said by someone on here) if that's not compulsory I don't know what that is. If you have it you don't face consequences if you don't you will. " That still isn't compulsory...if someone qualifies for the flu jab and they choose not to have it thats their choice, but there could be consequences that go along with that choice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So back to my original statement If you don't have it you will have restrictions, if you do you won't that's just another way of saying compulsory. Christ knows why certain people on here don't get it. I never mentioned certain things originally because I know there's restrictions in place especially if your traveling (injections, insurance) but I was very simply saying it's just another way of sugar coating the word compulsory. Apparently you'll have to face consequences if you don't (said by someone on here) if that's not compulsory I don't know what that is. If you have it you don't face consequences if you don't you will. " All choices come with consequences. That's the way absolutely everything in life works. Absolutely everything. At the moment if you go to Australia you're in hotel quarantine, army guarded (most states) for 14 days. Go to Australia, don't go to Australia. That's your choice. Some stores say you have to be dressed, not in pyjamas, to enter. That doesn't make being dressed in pyjamas compulsory. You just don't go there in pyjamas. "Not getting to do certain optional things" unless you're vaccinated isn't compulsory. Compulsory would be "get vaccinated or no NHS." Or "get vaccinated or prison." (No I'm not advocating for that!) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So back to my original statement If you don't have it you will have restrictions, if you do you won't that's just another way of saying compulsory. Christ knows why certain people on here don't get it. I never mentioned certain things originally because I know there's restrictions in place especially if your traveling (injections, insurance) but I was very simply saying it's just another way of sugar coating the word compulsory. Apparently you'll have to face consequences if you don't (said by someone on here) if that's not compulsory I don't know what that is. If you have it you don't face consequences if you don't you will. " I think you're making your own point. If you haven't had it, nobody is going to drag you to a yellow bibbed serco facility and stick a needle in your arm. You just may not be able to do some of the things you want to... And that's your choice. No drama. And it's a big of because right now there is no approved vaccine or evidence of a plan for how it will be used. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think that is highly unlikely Me too but i did see that there is provision to put on the nhs app whether you have had the jab which could be a way around the so called passport.Show your app before entering that way they could tell if you have been vaccinated or not. Or borrowed someone else's phone.? id be more likely to lend someone my passport than my phone haha " Yeah all those fab cock shots you've been sent! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What about those who can't have the vaccine? Pregnant women, all the people that has been transplanted and are on inmunosurpressors, or simply those that are allergic just to mention a few. According to what I am seeing here they won't be allowed out since they haven't been vaccinated? Am I correct? Is that fair on them? What would you think if you were one of these people and everyone was out and about getting on with life and you had to be isolated and marginated? Seriously guys you need to start looking beyond yourselves. C xx They will be the people who will gain from others' willingness to get it, so that we have herd immunity. An official covid safe approval could denote both those who are unable to have it as well as those who have had it. This discussion here is only due to a government minister sharing his initial thoughts, s day or so into the job. We don't know what they and other governments will establish, nor what private businesses etc will implement. So glad to find someone that understands what I am saying and has some common sense. Thank you! " Thanks. This is overblown. It's just a mouthy rentagob Minister who's probably done no work at all. He's only just got the job. Sure fires some people up though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So back to my original statement If you don't have it you will have restrictions, if you do you won't that's just another way of saying compulsory. Christ knows why certain people on here don't get it. I never mentioned certain things originally because I know there's restrictions in place especially if your traveling (injections, insurance) but I was very simply saying it's just another way of sugar coating the word compulsory. Apparently you'll have to face consequences if you don't (said by someone on here) if that's not compulsory I don't know what that is. If you have it you don't face consequences if you don't you will. " You are confusing compulsory with social pressure. Compulsory means no choice. Vaccination is not going to be mandatory so you have choice and each choice has consequences. You still have that choice so therefore it’s not compulsory. It’s private institutions that are likely to mandate it like hospitality, insurance providers, sports facilities.... etc, etc, etc...... as a part of a duty of care to their employees and customers. If you don’t want to be vaccinated you take the risk that certain things maybe restricted to you but that’s your freedom of choice. Freedom is not a selfish individualistic free for all pursuit it comes with responsibilities. Your choice!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes as others have said, the choices we make, do have consequences. " Doesn't hurt to remind ourselves of that fact sometimes. It's easy to get lost in the self obsessed world we inhabit now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes as others have said, the choices we make, do have consequences. Doesn't hurt to remind ourselves of that fact sometimes. It's easy to get lost in the self obsessed world we inhabit now. " It is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In mental health... if deemed to have capacity and not on a dols, they can refuse to have the vaccine? I will choose not to have it if offered, preferring to take me chances... it's my right. " Travel company's may refuse to carry you to your chosen holiday destination. It's their right. Companies may refuse to employ you. It's their right. Businesses may refuse to serve you. It's their right. Rights got both ways. Your right to do as you please comes with your right to accept the consequences. Rights come with social responsibility. "My rights" is another way of saying me me me me me, with no thought (or care) of the impact on others. E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So back to my original statement If you don't have it you will have restrictions, if you do you won't that's just another way of saying compulsory. Christ knows why certain people on here don't get it. I never mentioned certain things originally because I know there's restrictions in place especially if your traveling (injections, insurance) but I was very simply saying it's just another way of sugar coating the word compulsory. Apparently you'll have to face consequences if you don't (said by someone on here) if that's not compulsory I don't know what that is. If you have it you don't face consequences if you don't you will. " I'm sorry, there's easy way to say this. You don't have a clue what compulsory means. E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In mental health... if deemed to have capacity and not on a dols, they can refuse to have the vaccine? I will choose not to have it if offered, preferring to take me chances... it's my right. Travel company's may refuse to carry you to your chosen holiday destination. It's their right. Companies may refuse to employ you. It's their right. Businesses may refuse to serve you. It's their right. Rights got both ways. Your right to do as you please comes with your right to accept the consequences. Rights come with social responsibility. "My rights" is another way of saying me me me me me, with no thought (or care) of the impact on others. E " Exactly. You have rights to make choices. Others have rights to make choices about you. Businesses have rights to set terms of business, including protecting the rights of other users. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm sorry, there's no easy way to say this. You don't have a clue what compulsory means. E" I'll put it in terms I suspect more will understand. If this goes ahead, this is like Mummy saying that if you eat your peas you can have pudding. Compulsory is Mummy saying either a) if you don't eat your peas you get no other food at all until you eat your peas, or b) if you don't eat your peas I'll hold you down and force them down your throat. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow who'd have thought, something that keeps us safe and economies running. Nooo not for me I'd rather moan about something. I'm not moaning pal, let me just grab the crayons to explain... UK government We will NOT make it compulsory!! UK government we will stop you from your general freedom if you don't have the vaccine. UK government the decision is completely yours. You want freedom so to speak have the vaccine if you don't expect to wear mask, loose your job, not go out to venues or events.... Best have the vaccine then. It's not freedom of choice it's compulsory my any other name." I'll be very interested in any case that involves someone losing their job over refusing a vaccine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm sorry, there's no easy way to say this. You don't have a clue what compulsory means. E I'll put it in terms I suspect more will understand. If this goes ahead, this is like Mummy saying that if you eat your peas you can have pudding. Compulsory is Mummy saying either a) if you don't eat your peas you get no other food at all until you eat your peas, or b) if you don't eat your peas I'll hold you down and force them down your throat." I'm ok, like peas. E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm sorry, there's no easy way to say this. You don't have a clue what compulsory means. E I'll put it in terms I suspect more will understand. If this goes ahead, this is like Mummy saying that if you eat your peas you can have pudding. Compulsory is Mummy saying either a) if you don't eat your peas you get no other food at all until you eat your peas, or b) if you don't eat your peas I'll hold you down and force them down your throat. I'm ok, like peas. E" Me too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow who'd have thought, something that keeps us safe and economies running. Nooo not for me I'd rather moan about something. I'm not moaning pal, let me just grab the crayons to explain... UK government We will NOT make it compulsory!! UK government we will stop you from your general freedom if you don't have the vaccine. UK government the decision is completely yours. You want freedom so to speak have the vaccine if you don't expect to wear mask, loose your job, not go out to venues or events.... Best have the vaccine then. It's not freedom of choice it's compulsory my any other name. I'll be very interested in any case that involves someone losing their job over refusing a vaccine. " If your job is in pharmaceutical research is be willing bet vaccination would be a requirement. Many other types of research where a clean bill of health is required. If M cuts himself shaving he can't work in certain areas in his employers business, risk of infection etc. E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself." Yet you keep commenting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. Yet you keep commenting " I believe the OP is allowed to, as long as forum rules are observed. E | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. Yet you keep commenting I believe the OP is allowed to, as long as forum rules are observed. E" Absolutely | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm sorry, there's no easy way to say this. You don't have a clue what compulsory means. E I'll put it in terms I suspect more will understand. If this goes ahead, this is like Mummy saying that if you eat your peas you can have pudding. Compulsory is Mummy saying either a) if you don't eat your peas you get no other food at all until you eat your peas, or b) if you don't eat your peas I'll hold you down and force them down your throat. I'm ok, like peas. E" Mushy peas if you’re force feeding please... less chance of choking | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So back to my original statement If you don't have it you will have restrictions, if you do you won't that's just another way of saying compulsory. Christ knows why certain people on here don't get it. I never mentioned certain things originally because I know there's restrictions in place especially if your traveling (injections, insurance) but I was very simply saying it's just another way of sugar coating the word compulsory. Apparently you'll have to face consequences if you don't (said by someone on here) if that's not compulsory I don't know what that is. If you have it you don't face consequences if you don't you will. I'm sorry, there's easy way to say this. You don't have a clue what compulsory means. E" What does compulsory mean well here is a list of other wort that can be used in the context... obligatory, mandatory, required, necessary, imperative, requisite and coercive. You will be obliged to have the vaccine or you won't be allowed. It will be mandatory to have it if you want to come in here. Sorry you can't have insurance it's required that you have the vaccine. I could go on but the big one then coercive as in coercive behaviour, being told it's your own free will to have it but if you don't you won't be allowed to do the stuff you love. I suggest you look up what it means first before chirping up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. Yet you keep commenting I believe the OP is allowed to, as long as forum rules are observed. E" Forum rules state you shouldn't shame or abuse other people You can question their opinion not their decision to state their opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. Yet you keep commenting I believe the OP is allowed to, as long as forum rules are observed. E" The top part of this was my message nothing else was written by myself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So back to my original statement If you don't have it you will have restrictions, if you do you won't that's just another way of saying compulsory. Christ knows why certain people on here don't get it. I never mentioned certain things originally because I know there's restrictions in place especially if your traveling (injections, insurance) but I was very simply saying it's just another way of sugar coating the word compulsory. Apparently you'll have to face consequences if you don't (said by someone on here) if that's not compulsory I don't know what that is. If you have it you don't face consequences if you don't you will. " Of course its not do you not understand the word compulsory ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So it appears that the new minister for vaccination has admitted that immunity passports are being considered and if you have the vaccine you will be allowed to go the pub/restaurant, cinemas, football grounds etc. He has also said that if you were to not have the vaccine you will have to live with restrictions etc but "it's your choice" not much a choice then is it ? Compulsory by any other name. Wow, they'll be insisting on licences to drive cars next. You want to live in society, it comes with responsibility. Even by your standards that’s a pretty poor comparison. Quite frankly, I'm beyond caring, so sick of the bollocks that's spouted on here daily, and the constant bending, twisting and down right flouting of the law. I stand by what I said, you want to be a part of society, act like it and think beyond yourself. Yet you keep commenting I believe the OP is allowed to, as long as forum rules are observed. E Forum rules state you shouldn't shame or abuse other people You can question their opinion not their decision to state their opinion." Please note the top message was written by me nothing else. I haven't once put anyone down ,shame them or abuse the forum rules. I have an opinion someone else has a different one. What I don't appreciate is the emails I have had telling me how I should do this and do that to myself because my opinion isn't there's. Just saying. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So back to my original statement If you don't have it you will have restrictions, if you do you won't that's just another way of saying compulsory. Christ knows why certain people on here don't get it. I never mentioned certain things originally because I know there's restrictions in place especially if your traveling (injections, insurance) but I was very simply saying it's just another way of sugar coating the word compulsory. Apparently you'll have to face consequences if you don't (said by someone on here) if that's not compulsory I don't know what that is. If you have it you don't face consequences if you don't you will. Of course its not do you not understand the word compulsory ? " Read what compulsory means before chipping in it'll save a lot of effort on my behalf | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As I see it and it's only my opinion, that if the vaccine is good and prevents anyone having the vaccination fro getting covid19 then why worry if others decide not to have the vaccination. If they're not bothered about having a particular vaccine in their body, why would it concern people who do have it. It's not as though you can get it because you've had the vaccination. I'm not for it or against it but people have the right to allow a vaccine to be put in their body. Nobody knows the long term effects of the vaccine and when the vaccine companies are asking for legal immunity, it makes you think is it safe. All medicines and drugs have side effects and to some, the side effects are possibly worse than the illness. Personally, I say it should be optional not compulsory or mandatory. " I agree with everything you have just said, thank you. I was merely making a opinion as it doesn't sound like free will if you're being held back from doing things you normally would. I haven't decided if to have it or not personally at this moment yes but that changes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As I see it and it's only my opinion, that if the vaccine is good and prevents anyone having the vaccination fro getting covid19 then why worry if others decide not to have the vaccination. If they're not bothered about having a particular vaccine in their body, why would it concern people who do have it. It's not as though you can get it because you've had the vaccination. I'm not for it or against it but people have the right to allow a vaccine to be put in their body. Nobody knows the long term effects of the vaccine and when the vaccine companies are asking for legal immunity, it makes you think is it safe. All medicines and drugs have side effects and to some, the side effects are possibly worse than the illness. Personally, I say it should be optional not compulsory or mandatory. " The problem with this is that there are certain sections of society that are unable to have vaccines that rely on others to get vaccinated to achieve “Herd Immunity”.... and for Covid they’re talking of 80% take up required for this... Those that don’t get vaccinated because they’re badly informed or just selfish and ignorant are putting others at risk just as much as people that don’t follow social distancing rules or wear masks etc. To limit this risk it’s perfectly acceptable for private premises to refuse you entry or participation just as they can refuse you entry if you’re carrying a knife or being abusive | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So back to my original statement If you don't have it you will have restrictions, if you do you won't that's just another way of saying compulsory. Christ knows why certain people on here don't get it. I never mentioned certain things originally because I know there's restrictions in place especially if your traveling (injections, insurance) but I was very simply saying it's just another way of sugar coating the word compulsory. Apparently you'll have to face consequences if you don't (said by someone on here) if that's not compulsory I don't know what that is. If you have it you don't face consequences if you don't you will. Of course its not do you not understand the word compulsory ? Read what compulsory means before chipping in it'll save a lot of effort on my behalf" Is it compulsory if 8 out of ten pubs insist on it before entering or 2 out of 3 airlines insist on it before boarding their planes? because that sounds more like freedom of choice to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |