FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > dodgy dossier

dodgy dossier

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *etsome OP   Man  over a year ago

birmingham

Will the graphs used on saturday - and shown within minutes to be inaccurate - be Flatten the Sombrero's dodgy dosier?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *orwegian BlueMan  over a year ago

Iceland, but Aldi is closer..

Several studies concluded very similar figures and where there was a delta, this was highlighted.

The dodgy dossier quote was hugely inflammatory, the data was correct and based upon several key facts and some assumptions, which is how projections are calculated.

One of those assumptions was "If nothing is done", this was a correct assumption to use when the study commenced.

Something was then done, ie, the tiered lockdowns, this was not included.

The now updated projections took deaths from 1500 to 1000, a significant drop but not significant enough to not to do something drastic.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *moothman2000Man  over a year ago

Leicestershire


"

The now updated projections took deaths from 1500 to 1000, a significant drop but not significant enough to not to do something drastic.

"

I agree, but the conspiracy nutters unfortunately won't.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"Several studies concluded very similar figures and where there was a delta, this was highlighted.

The dodgy dossier quote was hugely inflammatory, the data was correct and based upon several key facts and some assumptions, which is how projections are calculated.

One of those assumptions was "If nothing is done", this was a correct assumption to use when the study commenced.

Something was then done, ie, the tiered lockdowns, this was not included.

The now updated projections took deaths from 1500 to 1000, a significant drop but not significant enough to not to do something drastic.

"

Shame they didnt act 2 weeks ago.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"

The now updated projections took deaths from 1500 to 1000, a significant drop but not significant enough to not to do something drastic.

I agree, but the conspiracy nutters unfortunately won't."

Tbf when they use false data to justify something so drastic..Its only right questions should be asked.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *etsome OP   Man  over a year ago

birmingham


"Several studies concluded very similar figures and where there was a delta, this was highlighted.

The dodgy dossier quote was hugely inflammatory, the data was correct and based upon several key facts and some assumptions, which is how projections are calculated.

One of those assumptions was "If nothing is done", this was a correct assumption to use when the study commenced.

Something was then done, ie, the tiered lockdowns, this was not included.

The now updated projections took deaths from 1500 to 1000, a significant drop but not significant enough to not to do something drastic.

"

they said the tiers were working - just not quickly enough. It would be interesting to know how much quicker they would have had to work for us to avoid another lockdown

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *moothman2000Man  over a year ago

Leicestershire


"

Tbf when they use false data to justify something so drastic..Its only right questions should be asked."

I think it was unintentional.

If they wanted to hoodwink us (for reasons I can't even think of), they'd have manufactured some figures that suited the narrative in the space of ten minutes.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"

Tbf when they use false data to justify something so drastic..Its only right questions should be asked.

I think it was unintentional.

If they wanted to hoodwink us (for reasons I can't even think of), they'd have manufactured some figures that suited the narrative in the space of ten minutes."

Even so. You would have thought they would have made sure they got their figures right.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *moothman2000Man  over a year ago

Leicestershire


"

Tbf when they use false data to justify something so drastic..Its only right questions should be asked.

I think it was unintentional.

If they wanted to hoodwink us (for reasons I can't even think of), they'd have manufactured some figures that suited the narrative in the space of ten minutes.

Even so. You would have thought they would have made sure they got their figures right."

Yep.

They did themselves no favours.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0