FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Number of deaths still low
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Covid is 24th in the league table of deaths,this has to stop and open everything up" It's 24th because we haven't opened up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" Better treatments from the experience health professionals have gained, if deaths remain low and hospital beds arent full then rules will be relaxed again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths" So how does that compare with the UK infection rate if we remove all restrictions? I'm sure watching more of your family die will dramatically improve suicide rates. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Covid is 24th in the league table of deaths,this has to stop and open everything up" So would you open up everything. And do you mean everything. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" They are rising, maybe not fast enough for some but much too fast for others. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths" And where did you get that from ? So since March your saying more people have died from suicide than from Covid , can we have facts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? Better treatments from the experience health professionals have gained, if deaths remain low and hospital beds arent full then rules will be relaxed again " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths" Urm no. There have been nowhere near 42,000 suicides this year. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" In April less people were tested and therefore greatly underestimated the number of people who actually had it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It does not matter what the numbers are; or what the truth is, we are bound by the dictatorship that is our Government; no parliamentary approval of new laws, no debate just imposition by Boris and his inner circle of cohorts. We can do nothing, so live / die with it, if you protest or demonstrate you will be fined / arrested. So be good people and get the people tracking App and be tracked like good people (sorry numbers). " If we are numbers...who is no 1? I never did get to the bottom of that one...knew who no6 was though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It does not matter what the numbers are; or what the truth is, we are bound by the dictatorship that is our Government; no parliamentary approval of new laws, no debate just imposition by Boris and his inner circle of cohorts. We can do nothing, so live / die with it, if you protest or demonstrate you will be fined / arrested. So be good people and get the people tracking App and be tracked like good people (sorry numbers). If we are numbers...who is no 1? I never did get to the bottom of that one...knew who no6 was though " I'd would guess the queen but if your a believer I guess your God | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths" I think not . .. 5000 suicides 40 000 covid deaths | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So that means fewer people are falling ill with it presumably. Yet they say the increase in cases isn't due to the increased number of tests. They tell us what they want us to hear." Don't listen. Just get valid data from credible sources, alongside evidence from reputable peer reviewed professional literature. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths I think not . .. 5000 suicides 40 000 covid deaths " And only 2000 ish in RTA's | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So that means fewer people are falling ill with it presumably. Yet they say the increase in cases isn't due to the increased number of tests. They tell us what they want us to hear. Don't listen. Just get valid data from credible sources, alongside evidence from reputable peer reviewed professional literature. " I am listening. To Vallance and Whitty. They tell us the increase is not due to increased testing So why are the deaths not shooting up ? If it were like the first wave we should be up to 600 a day now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Covid is 24th in the league table of deaths,this has to stop and open everything up" List the 23 or a source please. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths" Source please... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So that means fewer people are falling ill with it presumably. Yet they say the increase in cases isn't due to the increased number of tests. They tell us what they want us to hear. Don't listen. Just get valid data from credible sources, alongside evidence from reputable peer reviewed professional literature. I am listening. To Vallance and Whitty. They tell us the increase is not due to increased testing So why are the deaths not shooting up ? If it were like the first wave we should be up to 600 a day now." Can I ask you the same funliverpool so what is it you want What would be your new normal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So that means fewer people are falling ill with it presumably. Yet they say the increase in cases isn't due to the increased number of tests. They tell us what they want us to hear. Don't listen. Just get valid data from credible sources, alongside evidence from reputable peer reviewed professional literature. I am listening. To Vallance and Whitty. They tell us the increase is not due to increased testing So why are the deaths not shooting up ? If it were like the first wave we should be up to 600 a day now." It's not like the first wave because it hasn't ripped through nursing homes. It's not like the first wave because way more testing. It's not like the first wave because positive tests are 5-10% compare to a figure nearer 50 earlier this year. It's not like the first wave because doctors have learnt how to treat better and more suitable medicines have been identified. All this above we are made aware of daily. Why can't you join the dots? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths" How do we stop suicides? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So that means fewer people are falling ill with it presumably. Yet they say the increase in cases isn't due to the increased number of tests. They tell us what they want us to hear. Don't listen. Just get valid data from credible sources, alongside evidence from reputable peer reviewed professional literature. I am listening. To Vallance and Whitty. They tell us the increase is not due to increased testing So why are the deaths not shooting up ? If it were like the first wave we should be up to 600 a day now. It's not like the first wave because it hasn't ripped through nursing homes. It's not like the first wave because way more testing. It's not like the first wave because positive tests are 5-10% compare to a figure nearer 50 earlier this year. It's not like the first wave because doctors have learnt how to treat better and more suitable medicines have been identified. All this above we are made aware of daily. Why can't you join the dots? " I can and I do That's why I am querying the so-called advice of these experts. You don't need to explain it to me The idea was to make people think it through | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths Source please..." There are no sources. We do not publish suicide figures with any regularity. As of the 1st of September the ONS only just published the figures from 2019 so to claim suicide is on the increase is conjecture. However, there is a huge drain on mental health. I lost my job in March and have struggled to pick up work. Money and bills are tough to see how I manage. I have been through very tough times a few years back and have coping mechanisms I can call on learned to help with it. Many people are feeling this for the first time and in much more difficult circumstances. It will leave its mark. But to put that in context, in 2019 - 5691 people’s deaths were registered as suicide - the highest number recorded for 20 years and equatable to 17/100000. Covid by comparison- at the height of the first wave we had alarming death rates attributed to covid. They were astounding. And to date covid has attributed to roughly to 70/100000 deaths in the UK That said just so you know I am in neither camp, the new rates of infection vs deaths is vastly different to the initial outbreak. Because we are better prepared, can diagnose it faster and use some anti viral and suppression medication therefore limiting the ferocity of it and the need for ICU Treatment. April 17 - 22,351 total with 8,269 listed as covid - 36% deaths September 11 - 9,811 - 99 attributed to covid 1% Let’s hope this trend remains like this. But people. Please only post credible backed up statements rather than adding to either fear or conspiracy. As you were | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths Source please... There are no sources. We do not publish suicide figures with any regularity. As of the 1st of September the ONS only just published the figures from 2019 so to claim suicide is on the increase is conjecture. However, there is a huge drain on mental health. I lost my job in March and have struggled to pick up work. Money and bills are tough to see how I manage. I have been through very tough times a few years back and have coping mechanisms I can call on learned to help with it. Many people are feeling this for the first time and in much more difficult circumstances. It will leave its mark. But to put that in context, in 2019 - 5691 people’s deaths were registered as suicide - the highest number recorded for 20 years and equatable to 17/100000. Covid by comparison- at the height of the first wave we had alarming death rates attributed to covid. They were astounding. And to date covid has attributed to roughly to 70/100000 deaths in the UK That said just so you know I am in neither camp, the new rates of infection vs deaths is vastly different to the initial outbreak. Because we are better prepared, can diagnose it faster and use some anti viral and suppression medication therefore limiting the ferocity of it and the need for ICU Treatment. April 17 - 22,351 total with 8,269 listed as covid - 36% deaths September 11 - 9,811 - 99 attributed to covid 1% Let’s hope this trend remains like this. But people. Please only post credible backed up statements rather than adding to either fear or conspiracy. As you were " Gosh, so much sense in one post. Probably too much for many to absorb | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But if you shot you self would it not be death buy gun shot. " No, because I'd use a bow and arrow | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths Source please... There are no sources. We do not publish suicide figures with any regularity. As of the 1st of September the ONS only just published the figures from 2019 so to claim suicide is on the increase is conjecture. However, there is a huge drain on mental health. I lost my job in March and have struggled to pick up work. Money and bills are tough to see how I manage. I have been through very tough times a few years back and have coping mechanisms I can call on learned to help with it. Many people are feeling this for the first time and in much more difficult circumstances. It will leave its mark. But to put that in context, in 2019 - 5691 people’s deaths were registered as suicide - the highest number recorded for 20 years and equatable to 17/100000. Covid by comparison- at the height of the first wave we had alarming death rates attributed to covid. They were astounding. And to date covid has attributed to roughly to 70/100000 deaths in the UK That said just so you know I am in neither camp, the new rates of infection vs deaths is vastly different to the initial outbreak. Because we are better prepared, can diagnose it faster and use some anti viral and suppression medication therefore limiting the ferocity of it and the need for ICU Treatment. April 17 - 22,351 total with 8,269 listed as covid - 36% deaths September 11 - 9,811 - 99 attributed to covid 1% Let’s hope this trend remains like this. But people. Please only post credible backed up statements rather than adding to either fear or conspiracy. As you were " Thanks you for that well put | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But if you shot you self would it not be death buy gun shot. No, because I'd use a bow and arrow " WOW long arms are you Mr Tickle | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths And where did you get that from ? So since March your saying more people have died from suicide than from Covid , can we have facts " It's a mute point anyway either way. We've been socially distancing, wearing masks, working from home etc so the Covid death rate is hopefully skewed lower because of the restrictions. So if suicide is higher, we still shouldn't open up as deaths will probably rise and if it's lower that's still not a reason to open up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But if you shot you self would it not be death buy gun shot. No, because I'd use a bow and arrow WOW long arms are you Mr Tickle " Nah, you can use your foot or set it up to be triggered by a string pull. Point being shot doesn't necessarily mean by a gun. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But if you shot you self would it not be death buy gun shot. No, because I'd use a bow and arrow WOW long arms are you Mr Tickle Nah, you can use your foot or set it up to be triggered by a string pull. Point being shot doesn't necessarily mean by a gun. " Dope | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But if you shot you self would it not be death buy gun shot. No, because I'd use a bow and arrow WOW long arms are you Mr Tickle Nah, you can use your foot or set it up to be triggered by a string pull. Point being shot doesn't necessarily mean by a gun. " I was looking at you profile pick at the time I put Mr Tickle | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But if you shot you self would it not be death buy gun shot. No, because I'd use a bow and arrow WOW long arms are you Mr Tickle Nah, you can use your foot or set it up to be triggered by a string pull. Point being shot doesn't necessarily mean by a gun. I was looking at you profile pick at the time I put Mr Tickle " Actually S might secretly BE Mr Tickle. He has long arms (and other bodily features) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" They have also changed how they are counting deaths from covid,it makes a difference.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" They no how to treat people better. The problem is not so much deaths but the after effects of the virus | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It does not matter what the numbers are; or what the truth is, we are bound by the dictatorship that is our Government; no parliamentary approval of new laws, no debate just imposition by Boris and his inner circle of cohorts. We can do nothing, so live / die with it, if you protest or demonstrate you will be fined / arrested. So be good people and get the people tracking App and be tracked like good people (sorry numbers). " If people where good there wuld not be the problem s we have now. This government is to soft with people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths How do we stop suicides?" Stop you from writing anything | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" It’s very easy... It can take up to 12 days for people’s sysmtoms to come out It can take 12-14 days after becoming ill where people realise they are in serious trouble and enter hospital Whilst we’ve had people pass away within a week generally people can die much further down the line. We’ve had patients ventilated for 2 months plus, people pass away after 12 weeks etc. The numbers are there, they are now in hospitals and increasing... in my small ward in Manchester our 3 admissions a week is about 8 a day now. Give it 2-3 weeks and the daily deaths will be above 100, we are already at that level and increasing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths" The current estimate is that suicides for the year may reach 6,000 tops... Interestingly they where at their lowest levels since 2001 in the first quarter... In short, your wrong by 36,000 and counting... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths Source please... There are no sources. We do not publish suicide figures with any regularity. As of the 1st of September the ONS only just published the figures from 2019 so to claim suicide is on the increase is conjecture. However, there is a huge drain on mental health. I lost my job in March and have struggled to pick up work. Money and bills are tough to see how I manage. I have been through very tough times a few years back and have coping mechanisms I can call on learned to help with it. Many people are feeling this for the first time and in much more difficult circumstances. It will leave its mark. But to put that in context, in 2019 - 5691 people’s deaths were registered as suicide - the highest number recorded for 20 years and equatable to 17/100000. Covid by comparison- at the height of the first wave we had alarming death rates attributed to covid. They were astounding. And to date covid has attributed to roughly to 70/100000 deaths in the UK That said just so you know I am in neither camp, the new rates of infection vs deaths is vastly different to the initial outbreak. Because we are better prepared, can diagnose it faster and use some anti viral and suppression medication therefore limiting the ferocity of it and the need for ICU Treatment. April 17 - 22,351 total with 8,269 listed as covid - 36% deaths September 11 - 9,811 - 99 attributed to covid 1% Let’s hope this trend remains like this. But people. Please only post credible backed up statements rather than adding to either fear or conspiracy. As you were " Covid was registered as a mitigating factor in every death that occurred where covid was diagnosed, suicide is very different, drug overdoses aren't suicide, drinking yourself to death isn't suicide, cars rammed into trees aren't suicide, slashing your wrists in a bath isn't suicide, unless you leave a note saying your killing yourself it ain't suicide, death by misadventure, death by overdose, death by accident... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? It’s very easy... It can take up to 12 days for people’s sysmtoms to come out It can take 12-14 days after becoming ill where people realise they are in serious trouble and enter hospital Whilst we’ve had people pass away within a week generally people can die much further down the line. We’ve had patients ventilated for 2 months plus, people pass away after 12 weeks etc. The numbers are there, they are now in hospitals and increasing... in my small ward in Manchester our 3 admissions a week is about 8 a day now. Give it 2-3 weeks and the daily deaths will be above 100, we are already at that level and increasing." * Even 100 a day is small compared to what it was in April when we had 1000 on one day 13 deaths posted today It's going to have to shoot up an awful lot and very quickly then We shall see. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? It’s very easy... It can take up to 12 days for people’s sysmtoms to come out It can take 12-14 days after becoming ill where people realise they are in serious trouble and enter hospital Whilst we’ve had people pass away within a week generally people can die much further down the line. We’ve had patients ventilated for 2 months plus, people pass away after 12 weeks etc. The numbers are there, they are now in hospitals and increasing... in my small ward in Manchester our 3 admissions a week is about 8 a day now. Give it 2-3 weeks and the daily deaths will be above 100, we are already at that level and increasing. * Even 100 a day is small compared to what it was in April when we had 1000 on one day 13 deaths posted today It's going to have to shoot up an awful lot and very quickly then We shall see." I agree, if deaths and hospitalisations don't follow cases by mid October then we can stop panicking over case increases. At the end of the day all were actually concerned about it overwhelming the NHS? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? It’s very easy... It can take up to 12 days for people’s sysmtoms to come out It can take 12-14 days after becoming ill where people realise they are in serious trouble and enter hospital Whilst we’ve had people pass away within a week generally people can die much further down the line. We’ve had patients ventilated for 2 months plus, people pass away after 12 weeks etc. The numbers are there, they are now in hospitals and increasing... in my small ward in Manchester our 3 admissions a week is about 8 a day now. Give it 2-3 weeks and the daily deaths will be above 100, we are already at that level and increasing. * Even 100 a day is small compared to what it was in April when we had 1000 on one day 13 deaths posted today It's going to have to shoot up an awful lot and very quickly then We shall see. I agree, if deaths and hospitalisations don't follow cases by mid October then we can stop panicking over case increases. At the end of the day all were actually concerned about it overwhelming the NHS? " Pretty much agree with this. We have to lockdown early because there is a 5 to 6 lag on peak deaths, but if infections don't rocket and deaths don't rise then we could open up end of october. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths How do we stop suicides? Stop you from writing anything " Epic bantz. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths The current estimate is that suicides for the year may reach 6,000 tops... Interestingly they where at their lowest levels since 2001 in the first quarter... In short, your wrong by 36,000 and counting..." The other thing wrong with the suicide argument is that there's no 'realtime' record of suicides, something that the CEO of The Samaritans stated recently. That's mostly because the coroner has to record a death as suicide after an autopsy. People have always committed suicide all year round (with some seasonal peaks) for various reasons and that, unfortunately, will continue - not every suicide can be attributed to Covid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths" Did you know you can’t catch suicide from another person? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths Did you know you can’t catch suicide from another person? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Even 100 a day is small compared to what it was in April when we had 1000 on one day 13 deaths posted today It's going to have to shoot up an awful lot and very quickly then We shall see." That’s the point... you miss the maths and timeline. 13 deaths a day relates to 3-4 weeks ago, a time where we had around 400-500 new infections a day, we where admitting about 3 people a week in my trust. Fast forward to now... we are confirming 4K plus a day, 100’s if admissions across the U.K. trusts... we already know that death toll is coming. We also know the infections and admissions are climbing... we are also pretty sure the new restrictions in place are not checking that growth either, the conditions to deliver your 1000 deaths a day are only a few weeks away. Come the end of November you may just be seeing them again or worst. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" It's been suggested that it's done it's worst as far as deaths are concerned for now. There are those who are still vulnerable with other underlying health issues that managed to avoid it but these numbers are much smaller now. Maybe next year or the year after these numbers may again increase but no one can say as we don't know if or how natural immunity will work with it, or how effective a vaccine will be when they get one safe enough. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Even 100 a day is small compared to what it was in April when we had 1000 on one day 13 deaths posted today It's going to have to shoot up an awful lot and very quickly then We shall see. That’s the point... you miss the maths and timeline. 13 deaths a day relates to 3-4 weeks ago, a time where we had around 400-500 new infections a day, we where admitting about 3 people a week in my trust. Fast forward to now... we are confirming 4K plus a day, 100’s if admissions across the U.K. trusts... we already know that death toll is coming. We also know the infections and admissions are climbing... we are also pretty sure the new restrictions in place are not checking that growth either, the conditions to deliver your 1000 deaths a day are only a few weeks away. Come the end of November you may just be seeing them again or worst." Not true, The 13 deaths reported yesterday were just that. They died in the last few days, not 4 weeks ago Why would deaths be reported 4 weeks late ? If you look back at the figures on Worldometer you will see that the highest recoded number of daily deaths was on April the 11th when they peaked at just around 1100 And this was precisely the same day when the number of cases peaked at around 7500 By your reasoning if deaths are recorded 4 weeks late then they should have peaked on March 11th and the number of virus case would have peaked back sometime in mid February. But they didn't Look up the statistics | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Even 100 a day is small compared to what it was in April when we had 1000 on one day 13 deaths posted today It's going to have to shoot up an awful lot and very quickly then We shall see. That’s the point... you miss the maths and timeline. 13 deaths a day relates to 3-4 weeks ago, a time where we had around 400-500 new infections a day, we where admitting about 3 people a week in my trust. Fast forward to now... we are confirming 4K plus a day, 100’s if admissions across the U.K. trusts... we already know that death toll is coming. We also know the infections and admissions are climbing... we are also pretty sure the new restrictions in place are not checking that growth either, the conditions to deliver your 1000 deaths a day are only a few weeks away. Come the end of November you may just be seeing them again or worst." Many some need to see it to be live it. Some I'll include you are working so hard but others can't be assed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Even 100 a day is small compared to what it was in April when we had 1000 on one day 13 deaths posted today It's going to have to shoot up an awful lot and very quickly then We shall see. That’s the point... you miss the maths and timeline. 13 deaths a day relates to 3-4 weeks ago, a time where we had around 400-500 new infections a day, we where admitting about 3 people a week in my trust. Fast forward to now... we are confirming 4K plus a day, 100’s if admissions across the U.K. trusts... we already know that death toll is coming. We also know the infections and admissions are climbing... we are also pretty sure the new restrictions in place are not checking that growth either, the conditions to deliver your 1000 deaths a day are only a few weeks away. Come the end of November you may just be seeing them again or worst. Not true, The 13 deaths reported yesterday were just that. They died in the last few days, not 4 weeks ago Why would deaths be reported 4 weeks late ? If you look back at the figures on Worldometer you will see that the highest recoded number of daily deaths was on April the 11th when they peaked at just around 1100 And this was precisely the same day when the number of cases peaked at around 7500 By your reasoning if deaths are recorded 4 weeks late then they should have peaked on March 11th and the number of virus case would have peaked back sometime in mid February. But they didn't Look up the statistics" No they mean you catch CV19 to day In a week you get tested and bingo a positive. Start the clock after a week your taken I to hospital 2 weeks later you die So 3 to 4 weeks from getting it you die. So 4 weeks agooo 500 a day where getting it 13 die or more it's the weekend so if 1000 got it to day In about 4 weeks 26 will die or more and the more that get if the more that die | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" are you kind of sighing for a higher death count | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Not true, The 13 deaths reported yesterday were just that. They died in the last few days, not 4 weeks ago Why would deaths be reported 4 weeks late ?" Lordy... someone is being very dense here. Covid does not work like this: man gets infected, coughs, falls over dead... Those 13 deaths relate to today, yes... but they come from an infection time 3-4 weeks plus ago. That’s the time period they likely get infected before falling ill, becoming critical, enter hospital then lose their life. Why do people struggle with this concept that the infection rates do not relate to deaths recorded on the same day??? 13 deaths relates to a time period where confirmed infections actually was around 1/10th of todays figures... therefore don’t be surprised when we all looking at the 100’s in a few weeks time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are those who are still vulnerable with other underlying health issues that managed to avoid it but these numbers are much smaller now." Yes at the last count it’s only circa 15,000,000 with underlying health conditions in the U.K. the great majority also over 55... Even if we plump for the higher 55k punt at those deaths involving covid... that’s not really dented the figures too much has it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths Source please... There are no sources. We do not publish suicide figures with any regularity. As of the 1st of September the ONS only just published the figures from 2019 so to claim suicide is on the increase is conjecture. However, there is a huge drain on mental health. I lost my job in March and have struggled to pick up work. Money and bills are tough to see how I manage. I have been through very tough times a few years back and have coping mechanisms I can call on learned to help with it. Many people are feeling this for the first time and in much more difficult circumstances. It will leave its mark. But to put that in context, in 2019 - 5691 people’s deaths were registered as suicide - the highest number recorded for 20 years and equatable to 17/100000. Covid by comparison- at the height of the first wave we had alarming death rates attributed to covid. They were astounding. And to date covid has attributed to roughly to 70/100000 deaths in the UK That said just so you know I am in neither camp, the new rates of infection vs deaths is vastly different to the initial outbreak. Because we are better prepared, can diagnose it faster and use some anti viral and suppression medication therefore limiting the ferocity of it and the need for ICU Treatment. April 17 - 22,351 total with 8,269 listed as covid - 36% deaths September 11 - 9,811 - 99 attributed to covid 1% Let’s hope this trend remains like this. But people. Please only post credible backed up statements rather than adding to either fear or conspiracy. As you were " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It does not matter what the numbers are; or what the truth is, we are bound by the dictatorship that is our Government; no parliamentary approval of new laws, no debate just imposition by Boris and his inner circle of cohorts. We can do nothing, so live / die with it, if you protest or demonstrate you will be fined / arrested. So be good people and get the people tracking App and be tracked like good people (sorry numbers). If we are numbers...who is no 1? I never did get to the bottom of that one...knew who no6 was though I'd would guess the queen but if your a believer I guess your God " Has to be the Dalai Lama surely, don't they believe in reincarnation? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths And where did you get that from ? So since March your saying more people have died from suicide than from Covid , can we have facts " more people have died from suicide in the last 3 weeks than covid | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It does not matter what the numbers are; or what the truth is, we are bound by the dictatorship that is our Government; no parliamentary approval of new laws, no debate just imposition by Boris and his inner circle of cohorts. We can do nothing, so live / die with it, if you protest or demonstrate you will be fined / arrested. So be good people and get the people tracking App and be tracked like good people (sorry numbers). If we are numbers...who is no 1? I never did get to the bottom of that one...knew who no6 was though " I AM NOT A NUMBER. I AM A FREE MAN | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It does not matter what the numbers are; or what the truth is, we are bound by the dictatorship that is our Government; no parliamentary approval of new laws, no debate just imposition by Boris and his inner circle of cohorts. We can do nothing, so live / die with it, if you protest or demonstrate you will be fined / arrested. So be good people and get the people tracking App and be tracked like good people (sorry numbers). If we are numbers...who is no 1? I never did get to the bottom of that one...knew who no6 was though I AM NOT A NUMBER. I AM A FREE MAN " Only monday to Friday I'm a free man...on a weekend I'm a free... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths" there has been more suicide deaths than covid deaths since March? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths And where did you get that from ? So since March your saying more people have died from suicide than from Covid , can we have facts more people have died from suicide in the last 3 weeks than covid " Really? Do you have figures to substiate that? Someone raised this on another post saying 125 people had died that week from suicide and 27 from covid. Last year on average 109 people a week took their own lives so that is a 16 person increase per week using those stats supplied. Or 2.29 per day vs 20 to 30 people dying of Covid. Even if NO people took their own lives last year and EVERY suicide was attributable to covid (17) it still wouldn't match the covid fatality rate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" Honestly can't believe that this has to be said, but it's because vulnerable people like our friend who has underlying health problems and our parents are isolating from everyone else as they don't want to die! Combine that with hospitals being much emptier, care homes now having more PPE available along with better procedures this all helps to prevent the most vulnerable dying and it's a really good reason why we don't want to open everything back up now as if you ignore all measures in place then the death rate will rapidly rise. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. " Have you told the experts, I'm sure they would take your word for it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Have you told the experts, I'm sure they would take your word for it " No I got it from an expert writing in the spectator. Next pithy remark please. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. " Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I read that in France it’s not as potent at only 10% of the original strength. Hope that’s right and is what’s happening here?" There is no substantial evidence it is weakening to that extent. They are now back to cancelling scheduled treatments in France to help cope with the upswing in hospital admissions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy." Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Covid is 24th in the league table of deaths,this has to stop and open everything up It's 24th because we haven't opened up. " No. We opened up properly at the beginning of July. Remember, lockdowns don't work. As you can see. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Covid is 24th in the league table of deaths,this has to stop and open everything up It's 24th because we haven't opened up. No. We opened up properly at the beginning of July. Remember, lockdowns don't work. As you can see. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag " What's your propose then? Gimme an answer. Lockdown till it "goes away". Come on answers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag " What is it with you characters wanting to protect the health services.? I thought they were supporting to protect and help us!? And why so keen to ruin the private sector and why so keen on a vaccine? It could take 5 to 10 years. Sweden is over it. Why not learn? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag What is it with you characters wanting to protect the health services.? I thought they were supporting to protect and help us!? And why so keen to ruin the private sector and why so keen on a vaccine? It could take 5 to 10 years. Sweden is over it. Why not learn?" Swedish death rates are the highest is Europe and Sweden is a very different culture to the UK’s Today I found out that a 20 year old apprentice engineer in one of the plants I visit has been put in an induced coma so he can be respirated. He has no health issue and is fit, active and healthy. Don’t take the risk | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag What's your propose then? Gimme an answer. Lockdown till it "goes away". Come on answers." If left to me I'd shut the pubs and get the kids primed to be taught online as it seems the universities will be doing. Which will get us over winter and hope like hell we get the silver bullet from somewhere in the world by spring. Now I know you wont agree with me. But your sacrificial plan is not the answer... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would Captain Scott have said to Roald Amundsen. "It's OK old boy, you get to the South Pole first as I understand it gets a bit chilly at night". Or Sir Edmund Hilary say to Sherpa Tensing "oooer the airs a bit thin up here, we'd better get off the mountain as we might die". " Sorry. What's your point? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag What's your propose then? Gimme an answer. Lockdown till it "goes away". Come on answers. If left to me I'd shut the pubs and get the kids primed to be taught online as it seems the universities will be doing. Which will get us over winter and hope like hell we get the silver bullet from somewhere in the world by spring. Now I know you wont agree with me. But your sacrificial plan is not the answer... " How many are you sacrificing when it comes to cancelled surgery,referrals. Suicide up,jobs lost never to return. Suppose your hope of a silver bullet doesn't materialize? Again look at sweden . They have about 5 people per day dying from covid out of a 10 million population. Less than cancer,heart disease.Medics who have worked with covid patients for months not infected. Why because most are resistance. It's useless locking down it will just come out again. You have to let it run . Deaths now in the uk are very low. We're gettingbghete but will get there if we just let it run it's course. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag What's your propose then? Gimme an answer. Lockdown till it "goes away". Come on answers. If left to me I'd shut the pubs and get the kids primed to be taught online as it seems the universities will be doing. Which will get us over winter and hope like hell we get the silver bullet from somewhere in the world by spring. Now I know you wont agree with me. But your sacrificial plan is not the answer... How many are you sacrificing when it comes to cancelled surgery,referrals. Suicide up,jobs lost never to return. Suppose your hope of a silver bullet doesn't materialize? Again look at sweden . They have about 5 people per day dying from covid out of a 10 million population. Less than cancer,heart disease.Medics who have worked with covid patients for months not infected. Why because most are resistance. It's useless locking down it will just come out again. You have to let it run . Deaths now in the uk are very low. We're gettingbghete but will get there if we just let it run it's course. " I said you wouldn't agree...I also said what I would do. We will leave it there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Even 100 a day is small compared to what it was in April when we had 1000 on one day 13 deaths posted today It's going to have to shoot up an awful lot and very quickly then We shall see. That’s the point... you miss the maths and timeline. 13 deaths a day relates to 3-4 weeks ago, a time where we had around 400-500 new infections a day, we where admitting about 3 people a week in my trust. Fast forward to now... we are confirming 4K plus a day, 100’s if admissions across the U.K. trusts... we already know that death toll is coming. We also know the infections and admissions are climbing... we are also pretty sure the new restrictions in place are not checking that growth either, the conditions to deliver your 1000 deaths a day are only a few weeks away. Come the end of November you may just be seeing them again or worst. Not true, The 13 deaths reported yesterday were just that. They died in the last few days, not 4 weeks ago Why would deaths be reported 4 weeks late ? If you look back at the figures on Worldometer you will see that the highest recoded number of daily deaths was on April the 11th when they peaked at just around 1100 And this was precisely the same day when the number of cases peaked at around 7500 By your reasoning if deaths are recorded 4 weeks late then they should have peaked on March 11th and the number of virus case would have peaked back sometime in mid February. But they didn't Look up the statistics" Up from 13 to 71 today... you getting the concept yet fella? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag What is it with you characters wanting to protect the health services.? I thought they were supporting to protect and help us!? And why so keen to ruin the private sector and why so keen on a vaccine? It could take 5 to 10 years. Sweden is over it. Why not learn?" Sweden is far from ‘over’ it. In fact there was a big rise last week in infections leading to their chief medical officer Tegnell saying that there is a very worrying upwards trend and now the government is considering increasing restrictions, particularly in Stockholm. Why not learn? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" We were talking about this earlier today how the infection rates seem to be higher and higher every day yet deaths seem to have dropped through the floor. Could it be that the vast vast amounts of deaths attributed to Covid over the first few months weren't actually anything to do with COVID-19 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? We were talking about this earlier today how the infection rates seem to be higher and higher every day yet deaths seem to have dropped through the floor. Could it be that the vast vast amounts of deaths attributed to Covid over the first few months weren't actually anything to do with COVID-19 " 71 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? We were talking about this earlier today how the infection rates seem to be higher and higher every day yet deaths seem to have dropped through the floor. Could it be that the vast vast amounts of deaths attributed to Covid over the first few months weren't actually anything to do with COVID-19 71" Good film | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? We were talking about this earlier today how the infection rates seem to be higher and higher every day yet deaths seem to have dropped through the floor. Could it be that the vast vast amounts of deaths attributed to Covid over the first few months weren't actually anything to do with COVID-19 " You really don't get it, do you ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There has been no deaths from/of covid in Sweden for the last 3 days, iv just checked" The number of new infections has been rising over the last 3 weeks and the experts know that where a rise in cases goes a rise in deaths follows. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There has been no deaths from/of covid in Sweden for the last 3 days, iv just checked The number of new infections has been rising over the last 3 weeks and the experts know that where a rise in cases goes a rise in deaths follows." Maybe, maybe not, I hope not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There has been no deaths from/of covid in Sweden for the last 3 days, iv just checked The number of new infections has been rising over the last 3 weeks and the experts know that where a rise in cases goes a rise in deaths follows. Maybe, maybe not, I hope not" Well I tend to listen to the experts on these matters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There has been no deaths from/of covid in Sweden for the last 3 days, iv just checked The number of new infections has been rising over the last 3 weeks and the experts know that where a rise in cases goes a rise in deaths follows. Maybe, maybe not, I hope not Well I tend to listen to the experts on these matters." As do i | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The rise you are seeing is a rise in positive test results not infections or cases. The PCR test's CT rate is set at 45 which is far too sensitive and returns a false positive rate of between .8% - 1.4% which means 80% + of the positive test results are false positives. I'm still waiting for the mad rush of infections and deaths from the mass protests in May/June that didn't happen. Or the infections and deaths from the packed beaches. That also didn't happen. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There has been no deaths from/of covid in Sweden for the last 3 days, iv just checked The number of new infections has been rising over the last 3 weeks and the experts know that where a rise in cases goes a rise in deaths follows. Maybe, maybe not, I hope not" There’s zero maybe about it... At the start of this pandemic for every 5 into icu we lost three, end of story. With all the knowledge gained since we now lose 1 in 3, there’s nothing we can do to save that life. We are up to around 8 admissions a day currently on my ward, we know 2-3 of them will sadly pass away. For the record... yesterday’s 13 and today’s 71 seem are doth a bit of a blip, we feel the National daily average should be about 50 deaths a day but we already know that’s going to rise over the next 3 weeks, probably longer in truth. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The rise you are seeing is a rise in positive test results not infections or cases. The PCR test's CT rate is set at 45 which is far too sensitive and returns a false positive rate of between .8% - 1.4% which means 80% + of the positive test results are false positives. I'm still waiting for the mad rush of infections and deaths from the mass protests in May/June that didn't happen. Or the infections and deaths from the packed beaches. That also didn't happen. " Why don’t you actually read up on the infection models for covid-19... you’d realise the huge difference between inside and outside as an environment and then you’d think about the coming cold months and realise we have been incredibly lucky so far this year at minimising the affects of the virus and just how disastrous the coming period could be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People are going to die in a pandemic. We're in one. You can try putting restrictions and lockdowns in place, but, ultimately this just delays the inevitable. They're only meant to be used as a short-term fix, not long-term. Nobody's used to this, this is the problem. We need natural immunity to be achieved through herd immunity. Government needs to stop playing hide and seek with this virus and people need to face facts. The path we're on isn't going to give us an exit strategy. Wake up, use common sense & get a grip ffs. " Exactly this Unfortunately common sense is a very rare commodity this days it seems. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The rise you are seeing is a rise in positive test results not infections or cases. The PCR test's CT rate is set at 45 which is far too sensitive and returns a false positive rate of between .8% - 1.4% which means 80% + of the positive test results are false positives. I'm still waiting for the mad rush of infections and deaths from the mass protests in May/June that didn't happen. Or the infections and deaths from the packed beaches. That also didn't happen. Why don’t you actually read up on the infection models for covid-19... you’d realise the huge difference between inside and outside as an environment and then you’d think about the coming cold months and realise we have been incredibly lucky so far this year at minimising the affects of the virus and just how disastrous the coming period could be." Exactly We got it coming to spring and stifled somewhat with a lock down through spring and into summer...now we've opened up it's on the rise and we have all of autumn and winter to go through..so we need to get a grip on this now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag What is it with you characters wanting to protect the health services.? I thought they were supporting to protect and help us!? And why so keen to ruin the private sector and why so keen on a vaccine? It could take 5 to 10 years. Sweden is over it. Why not learn? Sweden is far from ‘over’ it. In fact there was a big rise last week in infections leading to their chief medical officer Tegnell saying that there is a very worrying upwards trend and now the government is considering increasing restrictions, particularly in Stockholm. Why not learn?" Infection isn't death. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There has been no deaths from/of covid in Sweden for the last 3 days, iv just checked" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok I'm really starting to have second thoughts on all this. Not sure how deaths are labelled in UK but here in Ireland it's died WITH covid where as used be FROM covid. Like how many people died DIRECTLY FROM Covid and had absolutely zero other health issues? This is what I want to know. " How many people die directly from AIDS? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok I'm really starting to have second thoughts on all this. Not sure how deaths are labelled in UK but here in Ireland it's died WITH covid where as used be FROM covid. Like how many people died DIRECTLY FROM Covid and had absolutely zero other health issues? This is what I want to know. How many people die directly from AIDS?" No idea. Why do you reference AIDS? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People are going to die in a pandemic. We're in one. You can try putting restrictions and lockdowns in place, but, ultimately this just delays the inevitable. They're only meant to be used as a short-term fix, not long-term. Nobody's used to this, this is the problem. We need natural immunity to be achieved through herd immunity. Government needs to stop playing hide and seek with this virus and people need to face facts. The path we're on isn't going to give us an exit strategy. Wake up, use common sense & get a grip ffs. " Interesting how it's generally people who aren't in the high risk groups that propose this course of action. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok I'm really starting to have second thoughts on all this. Not sure how deaths are labelled in UK but here in Ireland it's died WITH covid where as used be FROM covid. Like how many people died DIRECTLY FROM Covid and had absolutely zero other health issues? This is what I want to know. How many people die directly from AIDS? No idea. Why do you reference AIDS?" AIDS doesn't kill people, they die from something else but that doesn't mean AIDS isn't dangerous. Similarly, people with conditions that are exacerbated by Covid 19 may not die from Covid 19 but they also wouldn't have died without it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Interesting how it's generally people who aren't in the high risk groups that propose this course of action." Probably this sort of people are gonna get us out of this mess. And how exactly do you know who's in a high risk group or not? Holding a medical report on all fab members perhaps? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Why don’t you actually read up on the infection models for covid-19... you’d realise the huge difference between inside and outside as an environment and then you’d think about the coming cold months and realise we have been incredibly lucky so far this year at minimising the affects of the virus and just how disastrous the coming period could be." I have actually read up on that thank you, did I mispost? as thought I was on a thread "Number of deaths still low" and was giving my opinion to the OP's questions on why there are a relatively higher number of positive test results but a low number of deaths. As they asked So what is happening here? How do they explain that? I don't think I mentioned the upcoming flu season or the indoor/outdoor transmission rates of the virus of which I'm familiar with, but thanks for your recommendation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Interesting how it's generally people who aren't in the high risk groups that propose this course of action. Probably this sort of people are gonna get us out of this mess. And how exactly do you know who's in a high risk group or not? Holding a medical report on all fab members perhaps? " Call it an educated guess, I strongly suspect the people shouting loudest to let the disease rip through the population are not the ones at high risk of dying from it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Uk case numbers have been going down for days, they are not increasing exponentially. " Yet today it was announced that we have the highest number of new infections since July. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think I mentioned the upcoming flu season or the indoor/outdoor transmission rates of the virus of which I'm familiar with, but thanks for your recommendation. " It’s very simple... the deaths are already in progress. Admission rates are shooting up, given a bit of time a large percentage will die. The point is you cited “where are all the deaths from raves, beach gatherings etc”... the risk compared to indoor contact is fractional (as you state you already know). 71 people died today... if that was soldiers in Afghanistan etc I’m sure we’d all be saying give them better equipment, get them out or whatever... yet I suppose supporting them wouldn’t mean making any personal sacrifice would it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Uk case numbers have been going down for days, they are not increasing exponentially. Yet today it was announced that we have the highest number of new infections since July." Not so according to the data. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Interesting how it's generally people who aren't in the high risk groups that propose this course of action. Probably this sort of people are gonna get us out of this mess. And how exactly do you know who's in a high risk group or not? Holding a medical report on all fab members perhaps? Call it an educated guess, I strongly suspect the people shouting loudest to let the disease rip through the population are not the ones at high risk of dying from it." Not suggesting we should leave "the disease rip through population", but playing hide and seek with it is not going to help us either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Interesting how it's generally people who aren't in the high risk groups that propose this course of action. Probably this sort of people are gonna get us out of this mess. And how exactly do you know who's in a high risk group or not? Holding a medical report on all fab members perhaps? Call it an educated guess, I strongly suspect the people shouting loudest to let the disease rip through the population are not the ones at high risk of dying from it. Not suggesting we should leave "the disease rip through population", but playing hide and seek with it is not going to help us either. " So what do you suggest? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? We were talking about this earlier today how the infection rates seem to be higher and higher every day yet deaths seem to have dropped through the floor. Could it be that the vast vast amounts of deaths attributed to Covid over the first few months weren't actually anything to do with COVID-19 You really don't get it, do you ?" Well I was asking a question but feel free to enlighten me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think I mentioned the upcoming flu season or the indoor/outdoor transmission rates of the virus of which I'm familiar with, but thanks for your recommendation. It’s very simple... the deaths are already in progress. Admission rates are shooting up, given a bit of time a large percentage will die. The point is you cited “where are all the deaths from raves, beach gatherings etc”... the risk compared to indoor contact is fractional (as you state you already know). 71 people died today... if that was soldiers in Afghanistan etc I’m sure we’d all be saying give them better equipment, get them out or whatever... yet I suppose supporting them wouldn’t mean making any personal sacrifice would it. " What on earth are you going on about? you're making no sense and that's an awful analogy and again, I don't think I mentioned making or not making personal sacrifices, better or worse equipment. In fact I know I have not mentioned equipment, are you mixing up your replies? I didn't mention today's deaths either. But as you brought it up 71 deaths listed in in UK today. Wales 3, 44 in English hospitals, majority over 80, 2 under 60 rest 60-80. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There has been no deaths from/of covid in Sweden for the last 3 days, iv just checked The number of new infections has been rising over the last 3 weeks and the experts know that where a rise in cases goes a rise in deaths follows. Maybe, maybe not, I hope not There’s zero maybe about it... At the start of this pandemic for every 5 into icu we lost three, end of story. With all the knowledge gained since we now lose 1 in 3, there’s nothing we can do to save that life. We are up to around 8 admissions a day currently on my ward, we know 2-3 of them will sadly pass away. For the record... yesterday’s 13 and today’s 71 seem are doth a bit of a blip, we feel the National daily average should be about 50 deaths a day but we already know that’s going to rise over the next 3 weeks, probably longer in truth. " That's weird, my mate is a nurse at Blackburn Royal and he said its not any busier, no beds filling up, that's in ICU as well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think I mentioned the upcoming flu season or the indoor/outdoor transmission rates of the virus of which I'm familiar with, but thanks for your recommendation. It’s very simple... the deaths are already in progress. Admission rates are shooting up, given a bit of time a large percentage will die. The point is you cited “where are all the deaths from raves, beach gatherings etc”... the risk compared to indoor contact is fractional (as you state you already know). 71 people died today... if that was soldiers in Afghanistan etc I’m sure we’d all be saying give them better equipment, get them out or whatever... yet I suppose supporting them wouldn’t mean making any personal sacrifice would it. What on earth are you going on about? you're making no sense and that's an awful analogy and again, I don't think I mentioned making or not making personal sacrifices, better or worse equipment. In fact I know I have not mentioned equipment, are you mixing up your replies? I didn't mention today's deaths either. But as you brought it up 71 deaths listed in in UK today. Wales 3, 44 in English hospitals, majority over 80, 2 under 60 rest 60-80." And your reference to age... Is that suggesting that over 60’s aren’t really an issue? Your initial post seemed to be stating you where still waiting for death tolls to turn up... you seem to be questioning the need to take action to avoid the spread of this virus. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Uk case numbers have been going down for days, they are not increasing exponentially. " Sunday/Monday figures are often lower than the trend... trend line still shows doubling every 10 days | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ?" Easy to explain. The rise in virus infections this time round is happening more among the under 40s who were and are still less likely to be hospitalised or die from it. Part of the reason for the current restrictions - is to stop it spreading over to the more vulnerable who could potentially die from it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? We were talking about this earlier today how the infection rates seem to be higher and higher every day yet deaths seem to have dropped through the floor. Could it be that the vast vast amounts of deaths attributed to Covid over the first few months weren't actually anything to do with COVID-19 You really don't get it, do you ? Well I was asking a question but feel free to enlighten me " Those most at risk are still either shielding or being very careful about catching the virus but it's only a matter of time if those least at risk are stupid and spread the virus. People working in care homes have children. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think I mentioned the upcoming flu season or the indoor/outdoor transmission rates of the virus of which I'm familiar with, but thanks for your recommendation. It’s very simple... the deaths are already in progress. Admission rates are shooting up, given a bit of time a large percentage will die. The point is you cited “where are all the deaths from raves, beach gatherings etc”... the risk compared to indoor contact is fractional (as you state you already know). 71 people died today... if that was soldiers in Afghanistan etc I’m sure we’d all be saying give them better equipment, get them out or whatever... yet I suppose supporting them wouldn’t mean making any personal sacrifice would it. " Where are these admission rates shooting up? as they are not in England, Here are the actual total covid admissions with daily increase in brackets. Sep 29: 1881 (-2) 28: 1883(162) 27: 1721(99) 26: 1622(7) 25: 1615(134) 24: 1481(100) 23: 1381(46) 22: 1335(74) 21: 1261(120) 20: 1141(93) 19: 1048(60) 18: 988(35) 17: 953(59) 16: 894(28) 15: 866(84) 14: 782(121) 13: 661(28) I don't see much "shooting up" going on for a country with 65 million. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Take time to read it rather than hide behind your sofa https://www.aier.org/article/open-letter-from-medical-doctors-and-health-professionals-to-all-belgian-authorities-and-all-belgian-media/" I’m not hiding behind my sofa, I’m going to work every day and taking appropriate precautions such as hand washing, social distancing, and wearing a mask. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That's weird, my mate is a nurse at Blackburn Royal and he said its not any busier, no beds filling up, that's in ICU as well " Well today’s 174 estimated admissions across the NW, 73 of them COVID-19 confirmed already... I guess like you say, weird that your mate in one of the NW black spots isn’t seeing any of them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think it's comparable anymore because they don't report in the same way they did back then. It was all deaths then, now they only count it if it's with 28 days of a positive test. I think. " Exactly and to be honest a large percentage of the ventilated can last 28 days plus. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think I mentioned the upcoming flu season or the indoor/outdoor transmission rates of the virus of which I'm familiar with, but thanks for your recommendation. It’s very simple... the deaths are already in progress. Admission rates are shooting up, given a bit of time a large percentage will die. The point is you cited “where are all the deaths from raves, beach gatherings etc”... the risk compared to indoor contact is fractional (as you state you already know). 71 people died today... if that was soldiers in Afghanistan etc I’m sure we’d all be saying give them better equipment, get them out or whatever... yet I suppose supporting them wouldn’t mean making any personal sacrifice would it. What on earth are you going on about? you're making no sense and that's an awful analogy and again, I don't think I mentioned making or not making personal sacrifices, better or worse equipment. In fact I know I have not mentioned equipment, are you mixing up your replies? I didn't mention today's deaths either. But as you brought it up 71 deaths listed in in UK today. Wales 3, 44 in English hospitals, majority over 80, 2 under 60 rest 60-80. And your reference to age... Is that suggesting that over 60’s aren’t really an issue? Your initial post seemed to be stating you where still waiting for death tolls to turn up... you seem to be questioning the need to take action to avoid the spread of this virus." Why on earth are you assuming all this rubbish. I won't reply to you anymore as you are clearly a troll as you make absolutely no sense. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I won't reply to you anymore as you are clearly a troll as you make absolutely no sense. " Fabulous, everyone can read your post and take their own view x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do people not understand how pandemics work? The death rate will not massively rise as the first wave basically killed off the most at risk so you will now continually see the number of cases rise but the death rate will only slightly rise as its more healthy people become infected who have a much lower mortality chance with the virus. " Been saying that a while now. The others thing about this virus is that when it hit China last year it was already in a very advanced developed stage. Many virologists have suggested because of this it was probably around in China for 6 months to a year before. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think it's comparable anymore because they don't report in the same way they did back then. It was all deaths then, now they only count it if it's with 28 days of a positive test. I think. " That’s correct. Those who test positive for covid, but die of covid after 28 days, are not being counted among the covid deaths anymore. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think I mentioned the upcoming flu season or the indoor/outdoor transmission rates of the virus of which I'm familiar with, but thanks for your recommendation. It’s very simple... the deaths are already in progress. Admission rates are shooting up, given a bit of time a large percentage will die. The point is you cited “where are all the deaths from raves, beach gatherings etc”... the risk compared to indoor contact is fractional (as you state you already know). 71 people died today... if that was soldiers in Afghanistan etc I’m sure we’d all be saying give them better equipment, get them out or whatever... yet I suppose supporting them wouldn’t mean making any personal sacrifice would it. Where are these admission rates shooting up? as they are not in England, Here are the actual total covid admissions with daily increase in brackets. Sep 29: 1881 (-2) 28: 1883(162) 27: 1721(99) 26: 1622(7) 25: 1615(134) 24: 1481(100) 23: 1381(46) 22: 1335(74) 21: 1261(120) 20: 1141(93) 19: 1048(60) 18: 988(35) 17: 953(59) 16: 894(28) 15: 866(84) 14: 782(121) 13: 661(28) I don't see much "shooting up" going on for a country with 65 million." We cannot sustain the destruction of our economy for such small numbers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We cannot sustain the destruction of our economy for such small numbers. " Which of your family members are you prepared to sacrifice on the altar of capitalism? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Today they say a milestone of 1 million deaths worldwide from Covid 19 was reached today. Over a million people die in road traffic accidents worldwide but we still don’t think twice to driving or getting in to a car every day!" There wouldn't be that many road traffic accidents if the roads were shut. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Today they say a milestone of 1 million deaths worldwide from Covid 19 was reached today. Over a million people die in road traffic accidents worldwide but we still don’t think twice to driving or getting in to a car every day! There wouldn't be that many road traffic accidents if the roads were shut." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think I mentioned the upcoming flu season or the indoor/outdoor transmission rates of the virus of which I'm familiar with, but thanks for your recommendation. It’s very simple... the deaths are already in progress. Admission rates are shooting up, given a bit of time a large percentage will die. The point is you cited “where are all the deaths from raves, beach gatherings etc”... the risk compared to indoor contact is fractional (as you state you already know). 71 people died today... if that was soldiers in Afghanistan etc I’m sure we’d all be saying give them better equipment, get them out or whatever... yet I suppose supporting them wouldn’t mean making any personal sacrifice would it. Where are these admission rates shooting up? as they are not in England, Here are the actual total covid admissions with daily increase in brackets. Sep 29: 1881 (-2) 28: 1883(162) 27: 1721(99) 26: 1622(7) 25: 1615(134) 24: 1481(100) 23: 1381(46) 22: 1335(74) 21: 1261(120) 20: 1141(93) 19: 1048(60) 18: 988(35) 17: 953(59) 16: 894(28) 15: 866(84) 14: 782(121) 13: 661(28) I don't see much "shooting up" going on for a country with 65 million. We cannot sustain the destruction of our economy for such small numbers. " Small sample but looks like doubling every 10 days. To simplify the maths, let's call it 2,000 at the moment. There are about 90 days until christmas. That's 9x 10 day periods. 10 days - 2k 20 - 4k 30 - 8k 40 - 16k 50 - 32k 60 - 64k 70 - 128k 80 - 256k 90 - 512k covid admissions. Merry Christmas... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Exactly! " SO there would be many times more deaths from covid if there was no lockdown. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We cannot sustain the destruction of our economy for such small numbers. Which of your family members are you prepared to sacrifice on the altar of capitalism?" Nothing to do with capitalism - even more will die if we impoverish our nation, how many thousands more are you demanding are sacrificed? We can save the few, or the many, not both. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We cannot sustain the destruction of our economy for such small numbers. Which of your family members are you prepared to sacrifice on the altar of capitalism? Nothing to do with capitalism - even more will die if we impoverish our nation, how many thousands more are you demanding are sacrificed? We can save the few, or the many, not both." Thats a rather poor choice of words considering the "few" you talk about have already sacrificed so much so you can have the freedom you Currently have. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think I mentioned the upcoming flu season or the indoor/outdoor transmission rates of the virus of which I'm familiar with, but thanks for your recommendation. It’s very simple... the deaths are already in progress. Admission rates are shooting up, given a bit of time a large percentage will die. The point is you cited “where are all the deaths from raves, beach gatherings etc”... the risk compared to indoor contact is fractional (as you state you already know). 71 people died today... if that was soldiers in Afghanistan etc I’m sure we’d all be saying give them better equipment, get them out or whatever... yet I suppose supporting them wouldn’t mean making any personal sacrifice would it. Where are these admission rates shooting up? as they are not in England, Here are the actual total covid admissions with daily increase in brackets. Sep 29: 1881 (-2) 28: 1883(162) 27: 1721(99) 26: 1622(7) 25: 1615(134) 24: 1481(100) 23: 1381(46) 22: 1335(74) 21: 1261(120) 20: 1141(93) 19: 1048(60) 18: 988(35) 17: 953(59) 16: 894(28) 15: 866(84) 14: 782(121) 13: 661(28) I don't see much "shooting up" going on for a country with 65 million." You’ve just proven your own point... in two weeks admissions have near enough tripled. So, another two weeks... 6000, another two weeks later 1800... And to point out the obvious, the above are the ICU admission/capacity figures I believe. That discounts a huge number outside of HDU/ICU with the potential for their scenario to degenerate. Many will spend a week or two on a lesser care level before becoming critical. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whitty and Vallance say there is a two-to-three week lag between rising numbers of infections and rising numbers of deaths. Numbers of infections have been rising now since the beginning of September They are approaching the number last seem in April when we had 10000 infections in one day with 1000 deaths This week we have seen infections rise to more than 6000 in a day. But deaths are still very low at around 25-30 on average So what is happening here ? How do they explain that ? People are or have become immune as t lymphocytes have now built up. If you lock down you lock the virus away. Open up it comes back out. If we had let it run its course most would be immune. It's taken longer because it's a new virus so taken us longer to develop immunity but the death rate is still statistical almost identical to flu. Lock down just delays it doesn't stop. Plus the testing they're using is not accurate so figures are inaccurate. Just stay open,let it run and get it over with. Lockdown buys time to find better treatments, to potentially find a vaccine and prevents the health service being overwhelmed. Clearly you don't understand how to treat or manage a new and infectious disease, and thankfully for the tens of thousands you would gladly kill, you aren't in a position to influence policy. Yep it's always the low risk group who would put others up to sacrifice...just so they can get a shag What is it with you characters wanting to protect the health services.? I thought they were supporting to protect and help us!? And why so keen to ruin the private sector and why so keen on a vaccine? It could take 5 to 10 years. Sweden is over it. Why not learn?" “..... Sweden is over it. Why not learn?...” ——————————— Sweden over what ?? Currently Sweden is experiencing higher new daily infections and higher deaths than it’s neighbours Norway & Finland and all the other Nordic countries. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would Captain Scott have said to Roald Amundsen. "It's OK old boy, you get to the South Pole first as I understand it gets a bit chilly at night". Or Sir Edmund Hilary say to Sherpa Tensing "oooer the airs a bit thin up here, we'd better get off the mountain as we might die". Sorry. What's your point?" Many of us Human beings actually quite happy to take a bit of a risk to achieve something. Pretty obvious I'd have thought. You seem to think otherwise and I respect that so trying to do it your way but my natural instinct is to do stuff that possibly you would not consider as too risky so eventually some of us think "oh fuck it, I've had enough of this, let's live a bit and do something I've never done before." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do people not understand how pandemics work? The death rate will not massively rise as the first wave basically killed off the most at risk so you will now continually see the number of cases rise but the death rate will only slightly rise as its more healthy people become infected who have a much lower mortality chance with the virus. " But, this is common sense though. Something that's in short supply on these forums. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Exactly! SO there would be many times more deaths from covid if there was no lockdown." Well, many more would catch it but the death rate would be proportionally less. Most do not die from it. Most of those who have died, have other underlying health issues which and it accelerated their death because big weak immunity. The numbers with underlying health issue with a susceptable weak immunity have now vastly deceased. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do people not understand how pandemics work? The death rate will not massively rise as the first wave basically killed off the most at risk so you will now continually see the number of cases rise but the death rate will only slightly rise as its more healthy people become infected who have a much lower mortality chance with the virus. But, this is common sense though. Something that's in short supply on these forums. " I would suggest some are less clever with less common sense than they think! For the first wave to have killed off all those most at risk it would have had to be left to run its course, it wasn’t and it didn’t. We artificially cut the first wave by going into lockdown when we did! The vast majority of those most at risk did not get exposed to virus in the first wave. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Suicide rate is far more than covid deaths Source please... There are no sources. We do not publish suicide figures with any regularity. As of the 1st of September the ONS only just published the figures from 2019 so to claim suicide is on the increase is conjecture. However, there is a huge drain on mental health. I lost my job in March and have struggled to pick up work. Money and bills are tough to see how I manage. I have been through very tough times a few years back and have coping mechanisms I can call on learned to help with it. Many people are feeling this for the first time and in much more difficult circumstances. It will leave its mark. But to put that in context, in 2019 - 5691 people’s deaths were registered as suicide - the highest number recorded for 20 years and equatable to 17/100000. Covid by comparison- at the height of the first wave we had alarming death rates attributed to covid. They were astounding. And to date covid has attributed to roughly to 70/100000 deaths in the UK That said just so you know I am in neither camp, the new rates of infection vs deaths is vastly different to the initial outbreak. Because we are better prepared, can diagnose it faster and use some anti viral and suppression medication therefore limiting the ferocity of it and the need for ICU Treatment. April 17 - 22,351 total with 8,269 listed as covid - 36% deaths September 11 - 9,811 - 99 attributed to covid 1% Let’s hope this trend remains like this. But people. Please only post credible backed up statements rather than adding to either fear or conspiracy. As you were Great Post! " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the point that everyone seems to miss is that we are a long, long way off a mass vaccination programme and through lots of different reasons the NHS is woefully inadequate for us to try and run with the ‘herd immunity theory’. Hancock is way out of his depth because he has neither the intelligence or the ability to try and see a path through this. Add all those things together and the country will be continued to be in lockdown in some form for possibly years to come. We have a government that doesn’t know how to govern so uses ‘following the science’ as an excuse, we all know Whitey has made comments on numerous occasions that we should be in a lockdown until a vaccine is found. I think when this is all over and we look at deaths from other sources and the mass unemployment we will wonder if trying to eradicate Covid19 was actually worth it ! I will just add this, we had a summer of people flocking to seaside resorts and we had so few deaths on the back of that, the government and media are desperate to report how high the cases are at present, yet deaths armrest still in low double figures. Either more people have had this virus and haven’t died or it’s mutating and becoming weaker. What excuse will the government make in a couple of weeks if deaths aren’t up to 300 - 400 a day, will be very interesting ! " “...... What excuse will the government make in a couple of weeks if deaths aren’t up to 300 - 400 a day....” —————————- The government will not need to make an ‘excuse’ if the deaths aren’t up to 300-400 a day in a couple of weeks. If the above scenario happens, it will prove that local lockdowns and other restrictions have worked !! - thereby preventing 300-400 deaths a day. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the point that everyone seems to miss is that we are a long, long way off a mass vaccination programme and through lots of different reasons the NHS is woefully inadequate for us to try and run with the ‘herd immunity theory’. Hancock is way out of his depth because he has neither the intelligence or the ability to try and see a path through this. Add all those things together and the country will be continued to be in lockdown in some form for possibly years to come. We have a government that doesn’t know how to govern so uses ‘following the science’ as an excuse, we all know Whitey has made comments on numerous occasions that we should be in a lockdown until a vaccine is found. I think when this is all over and we look at deaths from other sources and the mass unemployment we will wonder if trying to eradicate Covid19 was actually worth it ! I will just add this, we had a summer of people flocking to seaside resorts and we had so few deaths on the back of that, the government and media are desperate to report how high the cases are at present, yet deaths armrest still in low double figures. Either more people have had this virus and haven’t died or it’s mutating and becoming weaker. What excuse will the government make in a couple of weeks if deaths aren’t up to 300 - 400 a day, will be very interesting ! “...... What excuse will the government make in a couple of weeks if deaths aren’t up to 300 - 400 a day....” —————————- The government will not need to make an ‘excuse’ if the deaths aren’t up to 300-400 a day in a couple of weeks. If the above scenario happens, it will prove that local lockdowns and other restrictions have worked !! - thereby preventing 300-400 deaths a day. " So the government advisors can never be proven wrong. Even though other epidemiologists questioned their predictions/not predictions. If their predictions/not predictions come about they can say we told you so. If their predictions/not predictions don't come about they can say it's because of the restrictions we put in place. Conveniently glossing over that restrictions have been in place in the north for weeks now and the positive tests keep going up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would Captain Scott have said to Roald Amundsen. "It's OK old boy, you get to the South Pole first as I understand it gets a bit chilly at night". Or Sir Edmund Hilary say to Sherpa Tensing "oooer the airs a bit thin up here, we'd better get off the mountain as we might die". Sorry. What's your point? Many of us Human beings actually quite happy to take a bit of a risk to achieve something. Pretty obvious I'd have thought. You seem to think otherwise and I respect that so trying to do it your way but my natural instinct is to do stuff that possibly you would not consider as too risky so eventually some of us think "oh fuck it, I've had enough of this, let's live a bit and do something I've never done before."" That's fine when your actions only affect you. With this disease, people going "fuck it I'm going to a party" then goes on to affect the people they come across in the supermarket, you know, the ones that are vulnerable and only leaving their houses for essential tasks. This forces them to be exposed to a higher risk they would avoid if they could, all because someone else couldn't be bothered to stick to the rules. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the point that everyone seems to miss is that we are a long, long way off a mass vaccination programme and through lots of different reasons the NHS is woefully inadequate for us to try and run with the ‘herd immunity theory’. Hancock is way out of his depth because he has neither the intelligence or the ability to try and see a path through this. Add all those things together and the country will be continued to be in lockdown in some form for possibly years to come. We have a government that doesn’t know how to govern so uses ‘following the science’ as an excuse, we all know Whitey has made comments on numerous occasions that we should be in a lockdown until a vaccine is found. I think when this is all over and we look at deaths from other sources and the mass unemployment we will wonder if trying to eradicate Covid19 was actually worth it ! I will just add this, we had a summer of people flocking to seaside resorts and we had so few deaths on the back of that, the government and media are desperate to report how high the cases are at present, yet deaths armrest still in low double figures. Either more people have had this virus and haven’t died or it’s mutating and becoming weaker. What excuse will the government make in a couple of weeks if deaths aren’t up to 300 - 400 a day, will be very interesting ! “...... What excuse will the government make in a couple of weeks if deaths aren’t up to 300 - 400 a day....” —————————- The government will not need to make an ‘excuse’ if the deaths aren’t up to 300-400 a day in a couple of weeks. If the above scenario happens, it will prove that local lockdowns and other restrictions have worked !! - thereby preventing 300-400 deaths a day. So the government advisors can never be proven wrong. Even though other epidemiologists questioned their predictions/not predictions. If their predictions/not predictions come about they can say we told you so. If their predictions/not predictions don't come about they can say it's because of the restrictions we put in place. Conveniently glossing over that restrictions have been in place in the north for weeks now and the positive tests keep going up. " Says the person conveniently glossing over the significant levels of non compliance with the rules and restrictions in precisely the places where infections are rising. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think the point that everyone seems to miss is that we are a long, long way off a mass vaccination programme and through lots of different reasons the NHS is woefully inadequate for us to try and run with the ‘herd immunity theory’. Hancock is way out of his depth because he has neither the intelligence or the ability to try and see a path through this. Add all those things together and the country will be continued to be in lockdown in some form for possibly years to come. We have a government that doesn’t know how to govern so uses ‘following the science’ as an excuse, we all know Whitey has made comments on numerous occasions that we should be in a lockdown until a vaccine is found. I think when this is all over and we look at deaths from other sources and the mass unemployment we will wonder if trying to eradicate Covid19 was actually worth it ! I will just add this, we had a summer of people flocking to seaside resorts and we had so few deaths on the back of that, the government and media are desperate to report how high the cases are at present, yet deaths armrest still in low double figures. Either more people have had this virus and haven’t died or it’s mutating and becoming weaker. What excuse will the government make in a couple of weeks if deaths aren’t up to 300 - 400 a day, will be very interesting ! “...... What excuse will the government make in a couple of weeks if deaths aren’t up to 300 - 400 a day....” —————————- The government will not need to make an ‘excuse’ if the deaths aren’t up to 300-400 a day in a couple of weeks. If the above scenario happens, it will prove that local lockdowns and other restrictions have worked !! - thereby preventing 300-400 deaths a day. So the government advisors can never be proven wrong. Even though other epidemiologists questioned their predictions/not predictions. If their predictions/not predictions come about they can say we told you so. If their predictions/not predictions don't come about they can say it's because of the restrictions we put in place. Conveniently glossing over that restrictions have been in place in the north for weeks now and the positive tests keep going up. " Firstly, anyone can be proven wrong, the government advisors haven't and they include epidemiologists. Secondly, the restrictions aren't working in the north due to many people questioning and many ignoring them Are you one of the many | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would Captain Scott have said to Roald Amundsen. "It's OK old boy, you get to the South Pole first as I understand it gets a bit chilly at night". Or Sir Edmund Hilary say to Sherpa Tensing "oooer the airs a bit thin up here, we'd better get off the mountain as we might die". Sorry. What's your point? Many of us Human beings actually quite happy to take a bit of a risk to achieve something. Pretty obvious I'd have thought. You seem to think otherwise and I respect that so trying to do it your way but my natural instinct is to do stuff that possibly you would not consider as too risky so eventually some of us think "oh fuck it, I've had enough of this, let's live a bit and do something I've never done before." That's fine when your actions only affect you. With this disease, people going "fuck it I'm going to a party" then goes on to affect the people they come across in the supermarket, you know, the ones that are vulnerable and only leaving their houses for essential tasks. This forces them to be exposed to a higher risk they would avoid if they could, all because someone else couldn't be bothered to stick to the rules." It's either supreme selfishness or stupidity | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would Captain Scott have said to Roald Amundsen. "It's OK old boy, you get to the South Pole first as I understand it gets a bit chilly at night". Or Sir Edmund Hilary say to Sherpa Tensing "oooer the airs a bit thin up here, we'd better get off the mountain as we might die". Sorry. What's your point? Many of us Human beings actually quite happy to take a bit of a risk to achieve something. Pretty obvious I'd have thought. You seem to think otherwise and I respect that so trying to do it your way but my natural instinct is to do stuff that possibly you would not consider as too risky so eventually some of us think "oh fuck it, I've had enough of this, let's live a bit and do something I've never done before." That's fine when your actions only affect you. With this disease, people going "fuck it I'm going to a party" then goes on to affect the people they come across in the supermarket, you know, the ones that are vulnerable and only leaving their houses for essential tasks. This forces them to be exposed to a higher risk they would avoid if they could, all because someone else couldn't be bothered to stick to the rules." And here lies the problem nowhere did he say he wanted to go to a party. It's the usual trope now. I think I'm capable of washing my hands, keeping my distance, wearing a mask indoors and can live my life accordingly. That doesn't mean I want to go to a party. get pissed or go and get fucked. As for the argument about giving it to someone in a supermarket if as we have been told close contact is within 2 metres for longer than 15 minutes and most people are wearing masks I question how great that risk is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |