FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Latest news ...83% support 2nd wave of Locked Down.
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it" Hear* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it" Know better in what respect? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd prefer lockdown for as long as needed to remove the virus as much as possible. It should have been tougher at the start. We have to get used to things being different and tougher, as most people have " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Know better in what respect?" That the experts,there seems to be quite a few lately, actually I only listen to one now, his podcast is straight talk, no sugar coating anything,it's quite scary what he thinks will happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wonder out of that 83% how many haven't followed the advice of the first lockdown" probably 10 % | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Know better in what respect? That the experts,there seems to be quite a few lately, actually I only listen to one now, his podcast is straight talk, no sugar coating anything,it's quite scary what he thinks will happen" Your correct Sending you a link to the bloke I listen/watch...has pretty good.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't frequent pubs, am a long haired git who hasn't been anywhere near a hairdresser in years and as I can't actually think of any shops I've missed going to... all this excitement makes no difference to me at all... " Stick your hair under a baseball cap when you do go out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts?" 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news ...83% Of the people they asked are cowards. " And 17% are idiots eh... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We should have opened everything up when the schools went back, the virus infection levels went too low from delaying it till now, and people are so desperate for a taste of life they will now not social distance for it. So levels can only go up, the virus isn't going to burn out like sars did and a second wave is on the cusp " Shhhh enough of the sensible comments | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Know better in what respect? That the experts,there seems to be quite a few lately, actually I only listen to one now, his podcast is straight talk, no sugar coating anything,it's quite scary what he thinks will happen" The problem with these experts is that they all say different things, you can pick and choose whichever one supports your own opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Know better in what respect? That the experts,there seems to be quite a few lately, actually I only listen to one now, his podcast is straight talk, no sugar coating anything,it's quite scary what he thinks will happen" can you direct me to podcast. Be interested in hearing his views. thanks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it" Who is the disease expert? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Who is the disease expert?" I think he's on a overlooked post by dash...I'll bump it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Who is the disease expert? I think he's on a overlooked post by dash...I'll bump it " Thanking you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Who is the disease expert? I think he's on a overlooked post by dash...I'll bump it Thanking you " Your welcome | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it" This is the gentleman he is refering to- Dr. Michel Osterholm,director of infectious diceases, minnesota University | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news ...83% Of the people they asked are cowards. And 17% are idiots eh..." There is no evidence of that the only evidence provided here is that 83% of people asked are cowards, too scared to leave their houses and want to make sure that everyone lives the same way they do. 83% of people that are able to continue their lives while others are on the bread line able but not allowed to work but sod them eh ... they don’t matter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it This is the gentleman he is refering to- Dr. Michel Osterholm,director of infectious diceases, minnesota University" Dont forget to give him a bump | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news ...83% Of the people they asked are cowards. " Some of us have a good chance of dying should we get this virus... Yep, it's cowardly of me to want to fucking survive instead of dying an awful and painful death alone. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Know better in what respect? That the experts,there seems to be quite a few lately, actually I only listen to one now, his podcast is straight talk, no sugar coating anything,it's quite scary what he thinks will happen The problem with these experts is that they all say different things, you can pick and choose whichever one supports your own opinion. " Not true, most are sugar coating it, how can you dismiss the credibility of a man who has fought sars, mers,swine flu,lime decease for over 40 year, surely he knows what he is talking about yes? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From a quick search, he is not really stating anything different from what we really know. He done made a bloody good effort of the Ebola vaccine though." Should say "from what we already know". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news ...83% Of the people they asked are cowards. " If it means keeping my loved one alive & not exposing them to any potential serious illness I'll happily take the coward tag | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Know better in what respect? That the experts,there seems to be quite a few lately, actually I only listen to one now, his podcast is straight talk, no sugar coating anything,it's quite scary what he thinks will happen can you direct me to podcast. Be interested in hearing his views. thanks." I'll PM you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Stick your hair under a baseball cap when you do go out " Baseball cap? I'd rather go bald... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news ...83% Of the people they asked are cowards. " Opinion or fact? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Stick your hair under a baseball cap when you do go out Baseball cap? I'd rather go bald... " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But you can't even spell "disease". Hmmmm ok though to your 40yrs fighting disease." Maybe he didn't mean disease.. Maybe decease was right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts? 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? " 83% of members of the public whom were asked. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts? 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? 83% of members of the public whom were asked." 83% want another holiday on 80% pay. Nice walks on the beach. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts? 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? 83% of members of the public whom were asked. 83% want another holiday on 80% pay. Nice walks on the beach." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts? 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? 83% of members of the public whom were asked." So 83% of the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland and the Isles were asked in the survey? Can you post a link to who carried out the survey | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Know better in what respect? That the experts,there seems to be quite a few lately, actually I only listen to one now, his podcast is straight talk, no sugar coating anything,it's quite scary what he thinks will happen The problem with these experts is that they all say different things, you can pick and choose whichever one supports your own opinion. Not true, most are sugar coating it, how can you dismiss the credibility of a man who has fought sars, mers,swine flu,lime decease for over 40 year, surely he knows what he is talking about yes? " I could search for 'experts' opinions on Google and find some that support every different opinion of people on this forum, all of them with qualifications in the relevant subjects. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts? 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? 83% of members of the public whom were asked. So 83% of the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland and the Isles were asked in the survey? Can you post a link to who carried out the survey " There may be some survey results on you gov. I've done surveys on there but it just takes me to my homepage | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts? 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? 83% of members of the public whom were asked. So 83% of the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland and the Isles were asked in the survey? Can you post a link to who carried out the survey There may be some survey results on you gov. I've done surveys on there but it just takes me to my homepage " Thank You | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts? 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? 83% of members of the public whom were asked. So 83% of the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland and the Isles were asked in the survey? Can you post a link to who carried out the survey There may be some survey results on you gov. I've done surveys on there but it just takes me to my homepage Thank You " No problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts? 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? 83% of members of the public whom were asked. So 83% of the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland and the Isles were asked in the survey? Can you post a link to who carried out the survey There may be some survey results on you gov. I've done surveys on there but it just takes me to my homepage Thank You No problem " The only poll from the YouGov web page is under Covid-19 - "70% of key workers are worried for families health" Nothing regarding the stated 83%. I'm curious now of where the op obtained his stats? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts? 83% of who? The entire UK. Or 83% of the 75 members of the public that were asked? 83% of members of the public whom were asked. So 83% of the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland and the Isles were asked in the survey? Can you post a link to who carried out the survey There may be some survey results on you gov. I've done surveys on there but it just takes me to my homepage Thank You No problem The only poll from the YouGov web page is under Covid-19 - "70% of key workers are worried for families health" Nothing regarding the stated 83%. I'm curious now of where the op obtained his stats?" Ahh I don't know where OP has got the information, that was my best guess. Thanks for sharing that tho | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts?" I am very glad at least it shows the people have more sense than I often give them credit for.If Boris wants to be popular he should bring back strict lockdown if a secomd wave,borders should be closed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But you can't even spell "disease". Hmmmm ok though to your 40yrs fighting disease." Mocking my bad spelling, big man | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Realistically there will always be a 2nd wave as you return from lockdown, it’s how that is managed at a regional basis that counts. We all need to just get back to work and bring money in, surely it is not sustainable to pause the economy indefinitely. Generations upon generations will be paying for all this in taxes for years to come. " This . It's a very tight balancing act. People need to get out there and back to work. Keep the people that need to shield safe. But let's get the rest back out working. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In other news 83% support getting 80% of their salary for sitting in the house doing fuck all" Now that's the truth! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In other news 83% support getting 80% of their salary for sitting in the house doing fuck all" Absolutely wonder how many would support lockdown when there’s no money coming in ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In other news 83% support getting 80% of their salary for sitting in the house doing fuck all Absolutely wonder how many would support lockdown when there’s no money coming in ? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So we are coming out of lockdown trying to mix and get back to normal, but no the 2nd wave is going to kill us all. But must come out of lockdown for the economy, and just watch people die. We have to follow spain,Italy, France and the rest,who are mixing now and dying in there thousands . Wake up coming out of lockdown is not going to kill us." Les will die as they know how to treat it better and anyway,but will be nowwhere near as bad | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand - is this saying 83% think we’ll suffer a 2nd wave? Or 83% think we should go back into lockdown, right now? I agree that we’ll probably see a 2nd wave, but we at least have to try coming out of lockdown - otherwise we’ll just go bankrupt, both individually and as a nation." In all fairness whatever the government does is a risk,if people are carefull it will work but so many are stupid,the pubs opening is a worry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand - is this saying 83% think we’ll suffer a 2nd wave? Or 83% think we should go back into lockdown, right now? I agree that we’ll probably see a 2nd wave, but we at least have to try coming out of lockdown - otherwise we’ll just go bankrupt, both individually and as a nation.In all fairness whatever the government does is a risk,if people are carefull it will work but so many are stupid,the pubs opening is a worry" Yep, got to dip a toe in, test the water. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You gov did ask me yesterday if I would support another lockdown There was a fairly even split across the answers though so I can't see the support option jumping up that high " I voted and am not against another lockdown if needed,local ones will happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t understand - is this saying 83% think we’ll suffer a 2nd wave? Or 83% think we should go back into lockdown, right now? I agree that we’ll probably manufacturing see a 2nd wave, but we at least have to try coming out of lockdown - otherwise we’ll just go bankrupt, both individually and as a nation." More like 83% of people who want to continue getting paid for doing nothing. I can't blame though because I'd like that as well.. But it doesn't work like that for all of us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Hear*" Several more corrections needed love. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Hear* Several more corrections needed love. " Iv said earlier in my post I'm not good at spelling,so carry on taking the piss | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Hear* Several more corrections needed love. Iv said earlier in my post I'm not good at spelling,so carry on taking the piss " Actually I'm not. I just thought it strange you'd only correct one error. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Hear* Several more corrections needed love. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"fine by me either way, as long as I can isolate from the virus. 2nd lockdown inevitable because there are Americans sneeking into the country. " Yep a bit like boris's dad sneaking into Greece via Bulgaria... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Hear* Several more corrections needed love. Iv said earlier in my post I'm not good at spelling,so carry on taking the piss Actually I'm not. I just thought it strange you'd only correct one error. " So this is what all that studying has come down to....a fab spelling cop. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. " I wonder how much support would drop off for a second wave lockdown if the Government stopped paying for the majority of the country to sit at home | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is this the sky news poll? Sure I heard it on there yesterday they had done a poll and 80 odd % were in favour of a 2nd lockdown or something. " 80 % said they don’t mind sitting out the summer away from work and drawing there money whilst watching the country sink into unprecedented debt | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news ...83% Of the people they asked are cowards. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In other news 83% support getting 80% of their salary for sitting in the house doing fuck all" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"83% of people who don't have a business on its arse, a pub about to close, a job in aviation or some one who goes to work every day with a mortgage to pay. Let's all go back into lockdown and live like a third world country." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news ...83% Of the people they asked are cowards. " And 100% of THE mindless selfish like you have no brian but more important no soul The purpose of lockdown is to protestr hospitals so the can still treat morons who need medical attention heart transplant any one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is this the sky news poll? Sure I heard it on there yesterday they had done a poll and 80 odd % were in favour of a 2nd lockdown or something. 80 % said they don’t mind sitting out the summer away from work and drawing there money whilst watching the country sink into unprecedented debt " I go to work every day FULL LOCKDOWN IMMEDIATELY. WHAT VALUE DO YOU GIVE TO LIFE!! 65K ADDITIONAL DEATHS FACT OR DON'T YOU CARE ABOUT SOMEONE'S PARENT OR GRANDPARENT WHAT A SELFISH COUNTRY WE LIVE IN | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news ...83% Of the people they asked are cowards. " I've been doing everything I can to protect myself, my loved ones, those around me and those at risk. I've been doing all I can to reduce the risk of catching it or passing it on. That's not cowardly, that's being a sensible, caring, thoughtful, considerate human being. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a bit of a twat. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is this the sky news poll? Sure I heard it on there yesterday they had done a poll and 80 odd % were in favour of a 2nd lockdown or something. 80 % said they don’t mind sitting out the summer away from work and drawing there money whilst watching the country sink into unprecedented debt I go to work every day FULL LOCKDOWN IMMEDIATELY. WHAT VALUE DO YOU GIVE TO LIFE!! 65K ADDITIONAL DEATHS FACT OR DON'T YOU CARE ABOUT SOMEONE'S PARENT OR GRANDPARENT WHAT A SELFISH COUNTRY WE LIVE IN" so all the cancer patents and other people who haven’t been treated don’t matter ? About 1 per cent of people who get virus actually succumb to it and 98 percent of them are in the high risk group ,Ian surprised you ever venture out of your house with all the risks of life but then again being in the house has risk as well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news ...83% Of the people they asked are cowards. Some of us have a good chance of dying should we get this virus... Yep, it's cowardly of me to want to fucking survive instead of dying an awful and painful death alone. " Is tragic there are things out the can even think coward it is only because of them some are sentenced to solitary confinement hopefully not a death sentence A bit of proper solitary in a dark box for a week with no phone might see who s a coward | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Really can’t believe people on here ..... no 2nd lockdown and there never should have been a 1st one either..... " Tell 65 k people who died that Also the 250 k who woukd died without lockdown YOU ARE SELFISH AND COWARD IF YOU DON'T WANT HELP THE VULNERABLE I WOULD CALL THAT A COWARD | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted before winter Goverment needs replacing lost the plot and I support initially Sack prime minster cummings and assistant boris World beating at getting it wrong. Full lockdown now before 2 late " If the Labour party were in power and making the same decisions as the incumbent party, would you still be demanding the government be replaced and the PM be sacked? It's a yes or no question. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wether its needed or not I don't see how the country can afford another lockdown. We're already in crippling debt with unprecedented unemployment." What price do you put on a life?? Where u outside liver Buildings breaking social distance rules | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wether its needed or not I don't see how the country can afford another lockdown. We're already in crippling debt with unprecedented unemployment." you have it so right , when people lose there jobs ,homes ,see there children have no prospects see there attitudes suddenly change ,all for a virus that we know only really affects the declared at high risk who could have been better isolated | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted before winter Goverment needs replacing lost the plot and I support initially Sack prime minster cummings and assistant boris World beating at getting it wrong. Full lockdown now before 2 late If the Labour party were in power and making the same decisions as the incumbent party, would you still be demanding the government be replaced and the PM be sacked? It's a yes or no question. " Yes I voted for Boris never voted Labour ever but I think prime minster cummings should be sacked and assistant boris. No bigger failing then not protecting vulnerable lives A government should protect the vulnerable not the greedy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is only the biggining, when will people realise this? This is comming from an infectious decease expert,if you think you know better than a guy who has been fighting deceases for 40 years let's here it Know better in what respect? That the experts,there seems to be quite a few lately, actually I only listen to one now, his podcast is straight talk, no sugar coating anything,it's quite scary what he thinks will happen" While I agree with you that this virus has to be taken seriously I'm not sure that listening to only one expert is right as even experts get things wrong, having said that I listen to a lot of experts to gain a better understanding and the majority view from them is that this is a very real problem and unless the public acknowledge this and start behaving responsibly in public we're going to be fucked again and face many more deaths come winter | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted " Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wether its needed or not I don't see how the country can afford another lockdown. We're already in crippling debt with unprecedented unemployment. you have it so right , when people lose there jobs ,homes ,see there children have no prospects see there attitudes suddenly change ,all for a virus that we know only really affects the declared at high risk who could have been better isolated " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wether its needed or not I don't see how the country can afford another lockdown. We're already in crippling debt with unprecedented unemployment. you have it so right , when people lose there jobs ,homes ,see there children have no prospects see there attitudes suddenly change ,all for a virus that we know only really affects the declared at high risk who could have been better isolated " I read someone bleating that we shouldn't be afraid of Covid 19 because it didn't affect 99.65% of the worlds population. Someone pointed out that the remaining .35% of the population was over 22 million people..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! " No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer" Do you have children? Do you have a partner? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer Do you have children? Do you have a partner?" Yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted before winter Goverment needs replacing lost the plot and I support initially Sack prime minster cummings and assistant boris World beating at getting it wrong. Full lockdown now before 2 late If the Labour party were in power and making the same decisions as the incumbent party, would you still be demanding the government be replaced and the PM be sacked? It's a yes or no question. " I'm not a tory supporter but if Labour were in power and making the same mistake as Boris and his team of clowns I would have no problem labeling Labour clowns as well. This is a Pandemic so having blinkers on and supporting a party who gets things so blatently wrong and that should apply to whatever party is in power. Boris is the current incumbent in Downing Street so he has to take the criticism of being at the top end of countries in dealing with this crisis | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! " But they haven't though have they? Seriously what does a 6,7,8 year old learn at school that 30bminutes with a half decent parent can't teach them each day? A book, some crayons... And then the older ones are being self sufficient, that's a great skill to learn. I admit that it's less than ideal. But to equate 3 or 4 extra months of their life at home with a denial of human right is hyperbole. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer" Liberty and education are both fundamental human rights. You are suggesting forcibly taking these things from children. Children who are naturally less at risk and lower risk of passing it on. As for your query about shielding parents - I would suggest the social services step in and provide temporary foster care for that child. There is no excuse to punish a child for their parents illness, whatever it may be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer Do you have children? Do you have a partner?" Our kids have been back 3 weeks now. No problems at all. They are all allocated thier social bubbles and have staggered timings and areas for playtime. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question" . If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer Do you have children? Do you have a partner? Our kids have been back 3 weeks now. No problems at all. They are all allocated thier social bubbles and have staggered timings and areas for playtime. You OK the kids, seeing grandparents " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer Do you have children? Do you have a partner? Our kids have been back 3 weeks now. No problems at all. They are all allocated thier social bubbles and have staggered timings and areas for playtime. You OK the kids, seeing grandparents " Yes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! But they haven't though have they? Seriously what does a 6,7,8 year old learn at school that 30bminutes with a half decent parent can't teach them each day? A book, some crayons... And then the older ones are being self sufficient, that's a great skill to learn. I admit that it's less than ideal. But to equate 3 or 4 extra months of their life at home with a denial of human right is hyperbole. " I work in education. I can tell you that school life and education is about far more than learning your abc. It’s not hyperbole to suggest that denying the right of a child to education contravenes the child’s human rights. It’s a simple, cold hard fact. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help ," That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help ," Thank you that's the pointing making goverment threatening fines Annd saying child safe to go to school is appropriate most but not those shielding I have sent many worried people asked this question and no answer given and people forum not considering vulnerable thank for your reply It's not us who are wrong we all got our opinions but getting mixed messages from goverment causing misunderstanding between decent people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , Thank you that's the pointing making goverment threatening fines Annd saying child safe to go to school is appropriate most but not those shielding I have sent many worried people asked this question and no answer given and people forum not considering vulnerable thank for your reply It's not us who are wrong we all got our opinions but getting mixed messages from goverment causing misunderstanding between decent people " Are you ignoring me? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school." What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER" Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The goverment gudlines were clear, and the schools in our area are doing fine. I have only praise for all the teachers involved as they had a monumental task to contend with. " You trust the goverment After All the lies and dimminc cummings | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you work education the child well being is priority A child wants to be with their parents No decent parent would want to be away from their child There a solution. In exceptional circumstances child home schools this is exceptional Im sad you believe a child who is worried anyway should be taken away from family home " Okay. Now you are just being rude and hysterical. I’m sad that some children are going to be mollycoddled by their overprotective parents. This generation of children really are going to suffer for the terrible decisions made by the adults in their lives. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you work education the child well being is priority A child wants to be with their parents No decent parent would want to be away from their child There a solution. In exceptional circumstances child home schools this is exceptional Im sad you believe a child who is worried anyway should be taken away from family home " I can see your point, but I do think the family nucleus is inherently variable and some families are closer than others. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The goverment gudlines were clear, and the schools in our area are doing fine. I have only praise for all the teachers involved as they had a monumental task to contend with. You trust the goverment After All the lies and dimminc cummings" I trust the schools and the teachers to carry on with what they are currently doing as it works. Regardless if I trust the goverment or not, the emphasis is on the kids not and not pissing contest about which politician did what. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you work education the child well being is priority A child wants to be with their parents No decent parent would want to be away from their child My children have 100 percent attendance one parent is, a scholl governor Education is priority Protecting family is paramount to any decent person. Additionally not all school teachers act on child's best interest alot just career and money. NOT ALL. Hope your children realise you put education before the family You can't bring people back to life. Friend of mine had a year off with illness when 9. Now has PhD and very senior job. Bit his parent when theyt were 9 and they haven't brought them back to life but did recover education family protection first can't believe any parent would disagree There a solution. In exceptional circumstances child home schools this is exceptional Im sad you believe a child who is worried anyway should be taken away from family home Okay. Now you are just being rude and hysterical. I’m sad that some children are going to be mollycoddled by their overprotective parents. This generation of children really are going to suffer for the terrible decisions made by the adults in their lives." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time." Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also- it is the welfare of the child that is paramount. Wellbeing is a different word." Before pandamic People self school what's the criteria? As I said one parent school govenor | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding .. Thank jobsworth. Each case on merits Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also- it is the welfare of the child that is paramount. Wellbeing is a different word. Before pandamic People self school what's the criteria? As I said one parent school govenor" I think you just need to accept that parents are sending kids back to school. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. " Then as I have said twice now- social services can step in. It’s nothing to do with being a jobsworth. Strange connection there! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Latest news this morning,83 % members of the Public Supports 2nd Wave of Locked Down. How will you cope with Lifting of restrictions from tomorrow as its Super Saturday after months of Locked Down. Pub, hairdressers and some other shops opening tomorrow. Your thoughts?" Inaccurate figures...not everyone has been questioned or surveyed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also- it is the welfare of the child that is paramount. Wellbeing is a different word. Before pandamic People self school what's the criteria? As I said one parent school govenor" Well I don’t agree with home schooling either, but that is another debate!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. Then as I have said twice now- social services can step in. It’s nothing to do with being a jobsworth. Strange connection there! " Social services are probably more under resourced than they have been for decades, and this applied before this Pandemic arrived, and do disadvantaged family's want to be separated, do Foster families want to take on more children in this current climate, do disadvantaged families trust social services??? . Think of previous instances in our history where children have forcibly been separated from their families and this could be a problem waiting to bite back. And I think 'jobsworth' is very apt in this situation. People need to think outside 'the box' adapt and apply a common sense approach | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. Then as I have said twice now- social services can step in. It’s nothing to do with being a jobsworth. Strange connection there! Social services are probably more under resourced than they have been for decades, and this applied before this Pandemic arrived, and do disadvantaged family's want to be separated, do Foster families want to take on more children in this current climate, do disadvantaged families trust social services??? . Think of previous instances in our history where children have forcibly been separated from their families and this could be a problem waiting to bite back. And I think 'jobsworth' is very apt in this situation. People need to think outside 'the box' adapt and apply a common sense approach " Could you please explain how I am being deliberately unhelpful or obstructive by suggesting children could be placed outside of the family home? I’m concession to what you say, I suppose a child shouldn’t be forcibly removed from their home. However, I personally feel that keeping a developing child from their friends, fresh air, freedom and education, to protect my own health, would be incredibly selfish of me. As for social services- yes I realise they are under a lot of pressure. Sadly that will always be the case. However, social services tend to look for temporary foster arrangements within the child’s family in the first instance (unless of course, the family is the problem!!) - so it’s not like I’m talking about ripping children away from their homes and placing them in a dungeon somewhere. As for children being separated in the past- my grandad was sent away from London as an evacuee. His parents didn’t hyperventilate and clutch at their nighties. They did what was right for the children and sent them to a place of safety. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. Then as I have said twice now- social services can step in. It’s nothing to do with being a jobsworth. Strange connection there! Social services are probably more under resourced than they have been for decades, and this applied before this Pandemic arrived, and do disadvantaged family's want to be separated, do Foster families want to take on more children in this current climate, do disadvantaged families trust social services??? . Think of previous instances in our history where children have forcibly been separated from their families and this could be a problem waiting to bite back. And I think 'jobsworth' is very apt in this situation. People need to think outside 'the box' adapt and apply a common sense approach Could you please explain how I am being deliberately unhelpful or obstructive by suggesting children could be placed outside of the family home? I’m concession to what you say, I suppose a child shouldn’t be forcibly removed from their home. However, I personally feel that keeping a developing child from their friends, fresh air, freedom and education, to protect my own health, would be incredibly selfish of me. As for social services- yes I realise they are under a lot of pressure. Sadly that will always be the case. However, social services tend to look for temporary foster arrangements within the child’s family in the first instance (unless of course, the family is the problem!!) - so it’s not like I’m talking about ripping children away from their homes and placing them in a dungeon somewhere. As for children being separated in the past- my grandad was sent away from London as an evacuee. His parents didn’t hyperventilate and clutch at their nighties. They did what was right for the children and sent them to a place of safety. " Children do need education and social interaction and in an ideal world this would be enforced. This is not ideal times and families have to be shown some respect in what their view is best for their child.Very Few children and their families would gain a rightly so good outcome like your grandad did. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. Then as I have said twice now- social services can step in. It’s nothing to do with being a jobsworth. Strange connection there! Social services are probably more under resourced than they have been for decades, and this applied before this Pandemic arrived, and do disadvantaged family's want to be separated, do Foster families want to take on more children in this current climate, do disadvantaged families trust social services??? . Think of previous instances in our history where children have forcibly been separated from their families and this could be a problem waiting to bite back. And I think 'jobsworth' is very apt in this situation. People need to think outside 'the box' adapt and apply a common sense approach Could you please explain how I am being deliberately unhelpful or obstructive by suggesting children could be placed outside of the family home? I’m concession to what you say, I suppose a child shouldn’t be forcibly removed from their home. However, I personally feel that keeping a developing child from their friends, fresh air, freedom and education, to protect my own health, would be incredibly selfish of me. As for social services- yes I realise they are under a lot of pressure. Sadly that will always be the case. However, social services tend to look for temporary foster arrangements within the child’s family in the first instance (unless of course, the family is the problem!!) - so it’s not like I’m talking about ripping children away from their homes and placing them in a dungeon somewhere. As for children being separated in the past- my grandad was sent away from London as an evacuee. His parents didn’t hyperventilate and clutch at their nighties. They did what was right for the children and sent them to a place of safety. Children do need education and social interaction and in an ideal world this would be enforced. This is not ideal times and families have to be shown some respect in what their view is best for their child.Very Few children and their families would gain a rightly so good outcome like your grandad did. " Absolutely. It the families choice to make considering the current risks. There are currently two options, send your child or don't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. Then as I have said twice now- social services can step in. It’s nothing to do with being a jobsworth. Strange connection there! Social services are probably more under resourced than they have been for decades, and this applied before this Pandemic arrived, and do disadvantaged family's want to be separated, do Foster families want to take on more children in this current climate, do disadvantaged families trust social services??? . Think of previous instances in our history where children have forcibly been separated from their families and this could be a problem waiting to bite back. And I think 'jobsworth' is very apt in this situation. People need to think outside 'the box' adapt and apply a common sense approach Could you please explain how I am being deliberately unhelpful or obstructive by suggesting children could be placed outside of the family home? I’m concession to what you say, I suppose a child shouldn’t be forcibly removed from their home. However, I personally feel that keeping a developing child from their friends, fresh air, freedom and education, to protect my own health, would be incredibly selfish of me. As for social services- yes I realise they are under a lot of pressure. Sadly that will always be the case. However, social services tend to look for temporary foster arrangements within the child’s family in the first instance (unless of course, the family is the problem!!) - so it’s not like I’m talking about ripping children away from their homes and placing them in a dungeon somewhere. As for children being separated in the past- my grandad was sent away from London as an evacuee. His parents didn’t hyperventilate and clutch at their nighties. They did what was right for the children and sent them to a place of safety. Children do need education and social interaction and in an ideal world this would be enforced. This is not ideal times and families have to be shown some respect in what their view is best for their child.Very Few children and their families would gain a rightly so good outcome like your grandad did. " I think that parents should be respected - of course I do. I also think that they should be gently encouraged to consider all options and their potential outcomes for the future of their children. It’s not good enough to say- I know my kids, I know what’s best. Some people simply don’t know what is best, because they dont understand exactly what it is that education in schools offer children. The person who suggested that children are fine with a bit of paper and some crayons, for example. If people understood the wider benefits of access to education, perhaps their viewpoints on the importance of education would be different. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. Then as I have said twice now- social services can step in. It’s nothing to do with being a jobsworth. Strange connection there! Social services are probably more under resourced than they have been for decades, and this applied before this Pandemic arrived, and do disadvantaged family's want to be separated, do Foster families want to take on more children in this current climate, do disadvantaged families trust social services??? . Think of previous instances in our history where children have forcibly been separated from their families and this could be a problem waiting to bite back. And I think 'jobsworth' is very apt in this situation. People need to think outside 'the box' adapt and apply a common sense approach Could you please explain how I am being deliberately unhelpful or obstructive by suggesting children could be placed outside of the family home? I’m concession to what you say, I suppose a child shouldn’t be forcibly removed from their home. However, I personally feel that keeping a developing child from their friends, fresh air, freedom and education, to protect my own health, would be incredibly selfish of me. As for social services- yes I realise they are under a lot of pressure. Sadly that will always be the case. However, social services tend to look for temporary foster arrangements within the child’s family in the first instance (unless of course, the family is the problem!!) - so it’s not like I’m talking about ripping children away from their homes and placing them in a dungeon somewhere. As for children being separated in the past- my grandad was sent away from London as an evacuee. His parents didn’t hyperventilate and clutch at their nighties. They did what was right for the children and sent them to a place of safety. Children do need education and social interaction and in an ideal world this would be enforced. This is not ideal times and families have to be shown some respect in what their view is best for their child.Very Few children and their families would gain a rightly so good outcome like your grandad did. I think that parents should be respected - of course I do. I also think that they should be gently encouraged to consider all options and their potential outcomes for the future of their children. It’s not good enough to say- I know my kids, I know what’s best. Some people simply don’t know what is best, because they dont understand exactly what it is that education in schools offer children. The person who suggested that children are fine with a bit of paper and some crayons, for example. If people understood the wider benefits of access to education, perhaps their viewpoints on the importance of education would be different. " In an ideal world I agree but in these unprecedented times I think families should be given more of a say and while I'm sure most of social services offer a good and efficient service I could see that because of many of their well publicised past failings a good many family's would be distrusting of their advice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"83% of who was asked? I wasn't asked, neither were my wife or any of our friends so exactly who were this 83% you talk about, did they only ask 100 people, simply put there's a serious lack of information to go quoting some bloody survey that most of us haven't even seen" Just to clear up everything in the air ,this news came in yesterday morning on Sky news | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Answer this question I saw on bbc If both parents shielding how can child go to school Risk child OK but spreads virus to parents shielding Both parents die Child becomes ORPHAN HOW IS THAT IN CHILDS BEST INTEREST So should child go to school everyone avoids question. If both parents are shielding a high risk child no the child can’t go to school but nor can the parents go out ,it’s a really terrible problem and those are the people who really need help , That child could be placed in temporary foster care, stay with a family member or family friend. There is no reason whatsoever for that child not to go to school. What mother would want to be separated from her child Secondly the harm would do to the child CAN I ASK ARE YOU A MOTHER Yes I am actually. If it was a choice between my child languishing at home for the sake of my own health, or sending them to stay with their beloved aunt until it’s safe to come home. I would choose the latter option every time. Not all children have aunts or other support people they can turn to and these are mainly disadvantaged children in this category. If a disadvantaged family with no support have shielding issues and have no support then the child should be able to remain at home. It's no use being a 'jobsworth' in this type of situation. Then as I have said twice now- social services can step in. It’s nothing to do with being a jobsworth. Strange connection there! Social services are probably more under resourced than they have been for decades, and this applied before this Pandemic arrived, and do disadvantaged family's want to be separated, do Foster families want to take on more children in this current climate, do disadvantaged families trust social services??? . Think of previous instances in our history where children have forcibly been separated from their families and this could be a problem waiting to bite back. And I think 'jobsworth' is very apt in this situation. People need to think outside 'the box' adapt and apply a common sense approach Could you please explain how I am being deliberately unhelpful or obstructive by suggesting children could be placed outside of the family home? I’m concession to what you say, I suppose a child shouldn’t be forcibly removed from their home. However, I personally feel that keeping a developing child from their friends, fresh air, freedom and education, to protect my own health, would be incredibly selfish of me. As for social services- yes I realise they are under a lot of pressure. Sadly that will always be the case. However, social services tend to look for temporary foster arrangements within the child’s family in the first instance (unless of course, the family is the problem!!) - so it’s not like I’m talking about ripping children away from their homes and placing them in a dungeon somewhere. As for children being separated in the past- my grandad was sent away from London as an evacuee. His parents didn’t hyperventilate and clutch at their nighties. They did what was right for the children and sent them to a place of safety. Children do need education and social interaction and in an ideal world this would be enforced. This is not ideal times and families have to be shown some respect in what their view is best for their child.Very Few children and their families would gain a rightly so good outcome like your grandad did. I think that parents should be respected - of course I do. I also think that they should be gently encouraged to consider all options and their potential outcomes for the future of their children. It’s not good enough to say- I know my kids, I know what’s best. Some people simply don’t know what is best, because they dont understand exactly what it is that education in schools offer children. The person who suggested that children are fine with a bit of paper and some crayons, for example. If people understood the wider benefits of access to education, perhaps their viewpoints on the importance of education would be different. In an ideal world I agree but in these unprecedented times I think families should be given more of a say and while I'm sure most of social services offer a good and efficient service I could see that because of many of their well publicised past failings a good many family's would be distrusting of their advice" Many people have distrust of vaccinations, distrust of the police, distrust of the government in general, distrust in 5g, distrust in ... well ... I could go on all morning of what many may people distrust. I have to say though- when I saw places like Harringay on the list of places that may see rising cases/potential localised lockdown, my heart sank. But again- that is another debate! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Confused...What do they support? Do they support locking down before weve even unlocked or do they support it if it ever happens? TBH if 80 odd percent of people supported it and stayed locked down the rest of us would be pretty safe going about our usual business. Wonder what their opinion is on that? " 20% of the population is hell of a lot of people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some of us have worked throughout this. Personally, I would have struggled mentally with staying home all the time." It's good to look at different perspectives. Far too often on here people are expressing jealousy that there are those on furlough. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer Liberty and education are both fundamental human rights. You are suggesting forcibly taking these things from children. Children who are naturally less at risk and lower risk of passing it on. As for your query about shielding parents - I would suggest the social services step in and provide temporary foster care for that child. There is no excuse to punish a child for their parents illness, whatever it may be. " I doubt there are hundreds of Foster parents ready waiting. Social services are always calling for more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"83% of who was asked? I wasn't asked, neither were my wife or any of our friends so exactly who were this 83% you talk about, did they only ask 100 people, simply put there's a serious lack of information to go quoting some bloody survey that most of us haven't even seenJust to clear up everything in the air ,this news came in yesterday morning on Sky news" Cheers OP This is the article you were referring to- https://news-sky-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/coronavirus-britons-would-strongly-back-second-lockdown-if-covid-19-cases-spike-poll-reveals-12019957?amp_js_v=a3&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15938611948462&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.sky.com%2Fstory%2Fcoronavirus-britons-would-strongly-back-second-lockdown-if-covid-19-cases-spike-poll-reveals-12019957 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer Liberty and education are both fundamental human rights. You are suggesting forcibly taking these things from children. Children who are naturally less at risk and lower risk of passing it on. As for your query about shielding parents - I would suggest the social services step in and provide temporary foster care for that child. There is no excuse to punish a child for their parents illness, whatever it may be. I doubt there are hundreds of Foster parents ready waiting. Social services are always calling for more. " If you read my posts you will see where I quite clearly say that social services look to place children with family in the first instant. It’s getting a bit boring having to repeat myself to those who only seem to read what they want to read. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Confused...What do they support? Do they support locking down before weve even unlocked or do they support it if it ever happens? TBH if 80 odd percent of people supported it and stayed locked down the rest of us would be pretty safe going about our usual business. Wonder what their opinion is on that? " "....the rest of us would be pretty safe going about our usual business...." And how will you be going about your 'usual business' if some sectors of the economy is shutdown due to another lockdown ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer Liberty and education are both fundamental human rights. You are suggesting forcibly taking these things from children. Children who are naturally less at risk and lower risk of passing it on. As for your query about shielding parents - I would suggest the social services step in and provide temporary foster care for that child. There is no excuse to punish a child for their parents illness, whatever it may be. I doubt there are hundreds of Foster parents ready waiting. Social services are always calling for more. If you read my posts you will see where I quite clearly say that social services look to place children with family in the first instant. It’s getting a bit boring having to repeat myself to those who only seem to read what they want to read. " Chill out, your statement re family was further down the thread. I had a lot of catching up to do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer Liberty and education are both fundamental human rights. You are suggesting forcibly taking these things from children. Children who are naturally less at risk and lower risk of passing it on. As for your query about shielding parents - I would suggest the social services step in and provide temporary foster care for that child. There is no excuse to punish a child for their parents illness, whatever it may be. I doubt there are hundreds of Foster parents ready waiting. Social services are always calling for more. If you read my posts you will see where I quite clearly say that social services look to place children with family in the first instant. It’s getting a bit boring having to repeat myself to those who only seem to read what they want to read. Chill out, your statement re family was further down the thread. I had a lot of catching up to do. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think we should go to full lockdown now. Kids summer holidays let's get it sorted Children have already been locked up and denied their basic human right of access to education for the last four months. You want them to suffer even more?!? Jeesh! No I don't but no school or loss of life No school no brainer Do you have children? Do you have a partner? Yes " Then you have no idea what it's like to be a single parent at home for the ladt 3 months, with another 6 weeks of summer holidays ahead, looking after 3 children, all under 10. When you do, you might have a very different view. What is it they say about walking in someone else's shoes? By the way, no need to copy and paste your forum post into a PM. Reading it once was more than enough ta. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Dead easy. Stop all furlough and full salary payments now. Teachers/ others who dont work dont get paid. Stop mortgage holidays. Then ask the same people what they want to do..... " So you mean end all lockdown and social distancing. If only. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Dead easy. Stop all furlough and full salary payments now. Teachers/ others who dont work dont get paid. Stop mortgage holidays. Then ask the same people what they want to do..... " Death by covid or death by economics...Hilarious Go have a look at the news ourside outside the UK at 3 world counties where no one is laughing because its reality when they live on £1 a day. We live in a wealthy nation...be grateful the furlough schen has afford many an option to see out covid safely in a way most of the rest of the world hasn't Even in the USA the most help you got was a (delayed) cheque for £1000 and trumps signature on it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I trust the people who have been following the lockdown rules to the letter have also brought their weight into the 'normal' bmi range and reversed their diabetes because that is a far better long-term strategy than hiding under the bed." So everyone that followed the rules are overweight and has diabetes? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I trust the people who have been following the lockdown rules to the letter have also brought their weight into the 'normal' bmi range and reversed their diabetes because that is a far better long-term strategy than hiding under the bed. So everyone that followed the rules are overweight and has diabetes? " People of a healthy weight with no preexisting health conditions have little to fear from the virus. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |