FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > Dominic Cummings
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Broke lockdown rules. Travelling when he had the virus. GOT TO GO!" Just saw that on the news. Apparently, "Mr Cummings did not break government guidance because he and his wife stayed in a separate building." It also seems that "Labour said No. 10 needed to provide a "very swift explanation" for Mr Cummings' actions." Well, that's easy. He's a cunt. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Broke lockdown rules. Travelling when he had the virus. GOT TO GO! Just saw that on the news. Apparently, "Mr Cummings did not break government guidance because he and his wife stayed in a separate building." It also seems that "Labour said No. 10 needed to provide a "very swift explanation" for Mr Cummings' actions." Well, that's easy. He's a cunt." I think it is one of two things. 1. The media have got him in their sights for some reason. Or 2. Like you say, he is a cunt. (I don't like that word but I really don't like the individual that much either, he does sound like a nasty piece of work. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think he’ll be more difficult to get rid of than Rasputin sadly." Love the analogy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Somebody will be here to defend him shortly..." Defending the indefensible? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Broke lockdown rules. Travelling when he had the virus. GOT TO GO!" Yep, if Boris doesn’t sack him ( or force him to resign ) then it is obvious who is ruining the government. It really is turning into a horror show for the Tories . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He's creepy. He was at a Labour party conference years ago as an independent observer, now he's a Conservative advisor. What's his agenda. Keep him away from power circles for sure. He looks like trouble. " I reckon His agenda is to use populism and other tricks to get enough appeal from the elderly and sheep while he deconstructs the civil service and push through libertarian economic policy. He hates the state and all authority | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im uneasy about him on the one hand he is abit of a creep and isn't liked in Westminster on the other he's a winner, but yes I will defend him here...... He had a kid that he and his partner couldn't care for whilst suffering symptoms, so his parents looked after them whilst he and his partner isolated in a different part of the house. The police investigated this at the time and no action was taken so obviously didn't breech the conditions, this was nearly 2 months ago - why has this come out now? The law was very clear there about kids and what they should do in key workers Difference between this and prof Ferguson or the Scottish CMO is one was looking after the welfare of a kid (after all the welfare of children are paramount) and another was to get a carnel itch scratched multiple times and another was to visit a 2nd home multiple times." There is no excuse to drive 5 hours while ill. If you are well enough to drive then you can mind your kid. According to his Mrs in her magazine he could barely lift his head from the bed; so how did he drive them 5 hours away? You can’t drive 5 hours without stopping with a 3/4 year old so how many other people were out in danger by his stops? His parents are in their 70s so he shouldn’t have been there for childcare even well, let alone with symptoms when he’d been in direct contact with people who already had tested positive | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"if all of the other medical officers had to go then so should cummings... in fact cummins was doubly stupid for doing it whilst he was suppose to be self isolating for having the bloody thing... obviously every tory mp will now go on radio silence... and they will resist the outcry for him to go!" I think you'll find that many backbench Conservative MPs will be very vocal in their condemnation. Should the noise get louder, then he should rightly go. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Travelled 269 miles whilst symptomatic to stay with his parents. Coudln't make this shit up. Surely the Tories will be swift in their condemnation as they were with Neil Ferguson? Mr Hancock said that it was “just not possible” for him to continue his role within Sage, saying he made the right decision to resign. Cummings won't resign though. " Wonder if he re-fuelled on way and if so which fuel service station he used | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh and as for kuennesberg.... I suspect she has been promised a very well paid position once the bbc has been fucked over by the tories" A state broadcaster is a recipe for disaster. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He not only drove 250+ miles "with symtoms"" 37,364 fridge lengths apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In the meantime people pissed off with the different rules for them and us will think “fuck it” and head off out over the bank holiday letting Cummings’ herd immunity and get back to normal plans come to fruition " This will be the real issue if he isn't sacked - right now. How are police officers meant to persuade people to do the right thing, or even fine anyone for persisting in doing the wrong thing, if Cummings gets away with this? Excuse me, officer. Cummings didn't get a fine, just a talking to; so, now you've given me mine, can you just go away and leave me alone? That's what you did with him. Or are we not all equal under the law? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Helped Keep Corbyn out - so therefore I like him. I think he is a keyworker as he was advising the governments response to the pandemic and that was clearly written into the first Bill. But I agree if he has been a naughty boy then he should be treated as so. But then didn't the housing minister do the same and is still in role? We should also ban Madonna from singing too (I mean please do anyways) For leaving the UK to go a B'day Party after having tested positive. I wonder how man people on that flight and at the party caught it from her? I'm going to gather some stones - however I won't be the first to cast them, as I did go out without gloves and mask in the first two weeks so I'll just chip in a rock or two from the back. " Why are you comparing the actions of the government’s chief advisor with Madonna? Cummings actions are indefensible, but I doubt he will go, after all, he is running the government | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Helped Keep Corbyn out - so therefore I like him. I think he is a keyworker as he was advising the governments response to the pandemic and that was clearly written into the first Bill. But I agree if he has been a naughty boy then he should be treated as so. But then didn't the housing minister do the same and is still in role? We should also ban Madonna from singing too (I mean please do anyways) For leaving the UK to go a B'day Party after having tested positive. I wonder how man people on that flight and at the party caught it from her? I'm going to gather some stones - however I won't be the first to cast them, as I did go out without gloves and mask in the first two weeks so I'll just chip in a rock or two from the back. Why are you comparing the actions of the government’s chief advisor with Madonna? Cummings actions are indefensible, but I doubt he will go, after all, he is running the government " If I want to start a campaign to stop Madanno singing that is my right | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Helped Keep Corbyn out - so therefore I like him. I think he is a keyworker as he was advising the governments response to the pandemic and that was clearly written into the first Bill. But I agree if he has been a naughty boy then he should be treated as so. But then didn't the housing minister do the same and is still in role? We should also ban Madonna from singing too (I mean please do anyways) For leaving the UK to go a B'day Party after having tested positive. I wonder how man people on that flight and at the party caught it from her? I'm going to gather some stones - however I won't be the first to cast them, as I did go out without gloves and mask in the first two weeks so I'll just chip in a rock or two from the back. Why are you comparing the actions of the government’s chief advisor with Madonna? Cummings actions are indefensible, but I doubt he will go, after all, he is running the government If I want to start a campaign to stop Madanno singing that is my right " Of course, and I will support that campaign , | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ian Blackford gave a fantastic explanation of what should be done. " Former Scottish Health Secretary, Catherine Calderwood resigned after travelling 45 miles from Edinburgh to her second home in Fife. Meanwhile Boris Johnson, his Dad, the Queen, Prince Charles & entourage Also Jenrick, jack and red Tory Ian Murray travelled to London,during lockdown. and now Dominic Cummings. some whilst ill. Let's observe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If I want to start a campaign to stop Madonna singing that is my right Of course, and I will support that campaign , " And now we are two. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think he’ll be more difficult to get rid of than Rasputin sadly." Do love the analogy with Rasputin ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No 10 says... Cummings behaved 'responsibly and legally' according to reports lol " Of course they will, didn't Boris go to his "holiday" home | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you really think the whole corrupt lot of them are doing the same as us ... hell no .... and us soft shits are abiding by the rules " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Broke lockdown rules. Travelling when he had the virus. GOT TO GO! Just saw that on the news. Apparently, "Mr Cummings did not break government guidance because he and his wife stayed in a separate building." Agreed absolute cunt, all he needs is the uniform.... It also seems that "Labour said No. 10 needed to provide a "very swift explanation" for Mr Cummings' actions." Well, that's easy. He's a cunt." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The man should be sacked how Boris can support him is beyond belief" Maybe because Boris is a lying cunt as well ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The man should be sacked how Boris can support him is beyond belief Maybe because Boris is a lying cunt as well ?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i think that you are going to be able to look back at this point in the future when they ask "at what point did the public lose trust in the government over the lockdown rules".... you could call the act idiotic... the cover up and the defence are making this way way worse!" blame it all on the scientific advice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here....." What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No 10 says... Cummings behaved 'responsibly and legally' according to reports lol Of course they will, didn't Boris go to his "holiday" home" . We'll soon see if Cummings has more enemies than friends amongst the wider conservative party lol, the cabinet will have to toe the line I'm sure though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here....." The advice is that if you are displaying symptoms you and your FAMILY are to isolate at HOME. dies Mr Cummings family, because of thier position, deserve to be afforded differantly? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? " It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... The advice is that if you are displaying symptoms you and your FAMILY are to isolate at HOME. dies Mr Cummings family, because of thier position, deserve to be afforded differantly? " Check transcripts from DMO and look at the official guidelines about looking after kids if parents both have disease | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours " What about every other family in the country in similar positions?? Differant rules for Mr Cummings yes? His actions were stupid, these attempts to defend him are repugnant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours What about every other family in the country in similar positions?? Differant rules for Mr Cummings yes? His actions were stupid, these attempts to defend him are repugnant " No if they have the same circumstances the guidelines allow you to do it, there is not a 2 tier system | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours What about every other family in the country in similar positions?? Differant rules for Mr Cummings yes? His actions were stupid, these attempts to defend him are repugnant No if they have the same circumstances the guidelines allow you to do it, there is not a 2 tier system" While you are staying at home, make sure you do the following things Stay at home You and all household members should remain at home. Do not go to work, school, or public areas, and do not use public transport or taxis. If possible, you should not go out even to buy food or other essentials, and any exercise should be taken within your home. The 14-day period starts from the day the first person in your house became ill. If you require help with buying groceries, other shopping or picking up medication, or walking a dog, you will need to ask friends or relatives. Alternatively, you can order medication by phone or online. You can also order your shopping online. Make sure you tell delivery drivers to leave items outside for collection if you order online. The delivery driver should not come into your home. If you are an employee and unable to work due to coronavirus (COVID-19), please refer to this guidance from the Department for Work and Pensions to find out about the support that is available to you. If you are living with children Keep following this advice to the best of your ability, however, we are aware that not all these measures will be possible. What we have seen so far is that children with coronavirus (COVID-19) appear to be less severely affected. It is nevertheless important to do your best to follow this guidance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People are just using the hatred to sling it at DC and the Government, are forgetting he didn't break the advice " Depends who advice you are talking about, Boris said in one of his rare public briefings that grandparents can not look after their grand kids? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours " the rules were simple... anyone displaying symptoms and the WHOLE family stays at home.... partner and kids!!! his child could have already had it by the time they trotted them up north | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours What about every other family in the country in similar positions?? Differant rules for Mr Cummings yes? His actions were stupid, these attempts to defend him are repugnant No if they have the same circumstances the guidelines allow you to do it, there is not a 2 tier system While you are staying at home, make sure you do the following things Stay at home You and all household members should remain at home. Do not go to work, school, or public areas, and do not use public transport or taxis. If possible, you should not go out even to buy food or other essentials, and any exercise should be taken within your home. The 14-day period starts from the day the first person in your house became ill. If you require help with buying groceries, other shopping or picking up medication, or walking a dog, you will need to ask friends or relatives. Alternatively, you can order medication by phone or online. You can also order your shopping online. Make sure you tell delivery drivers to leave items outside for collection if you order online. The delivery driver should not come into your home. If you are an employee and unable to work due to coronavirus (COVID-19), please refer to this guidance from the Department for Work and Pensions to find out about the support that is available to you. If you are living with children Keep following this advice to the best of your ability, however, we are aware that not all these measures will be possible. What we have seen so far is that children with coronavirus (COVID-19) appear to be less severely affected. It is nevertheless important to do your best to follow this guidance." 23/3/2020 "A small child clearly is a vulnerable individual, so in this case, although we are encouraging everybody to stay in their own households - that's the unit with the same risk exposure - clearly if you have adults who are unable to look after a small child, that is an exceptional circumstance. "If the individuals do not have access to care support, formal care support or to family, they will be able to work through their local authority hubs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The excuse is that he self isolated away from his family. We all know he had the symptoms and had been in contact with Boris, !" The statement said he didn't have the symptoms | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours the rules were simple... anyone displaying symptoms and the WHOLE family stays at home.... partner and kids!!! his child could have already had it by the time they trotted them up north" The guidelines at the time let this trip happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours the rules were simple... anyone displaying symptoms and the WHOLE family stays at home.... partner and kids!!! his child could have already had it by the time they trotted them up north The guidelines at the time let this trip happen " The dark side is strong in this one... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The excuse is that he self isolated away from his family. We all know he had the symptoms and had been in contact with Boris, ! The statement said he didn't have the symptoms" He definitely did, i remember him running out of downing street and it being on the news "Weekend of 28th & 29th- over this weekend Mr Cummings developed coronavirus symptoms downing street later confirmed. " Sky news | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours What about every other family in the country in similar positions?? Differant rules for Mr Cummings yes? His actions were stupid, these attempts to defend him are repugnant No if they have the same circumstances the guidelines allow you to do it, there is not a 2 tier system While you are staying at home, make sure you do the following things Stay at home You and all household members should remain at home. Do not go to work, school, or public areas, and do not use public transport or taxis. If possible, you should not go out even to buy food or other essentials, and any exercise should be taken within your home. The 14-day period starts from the day the first person in your house became ill. If you require help with buying groceries, other shopping or picking up medication, or walking a dog, you will need to ask friends or relatives. Alternatively, you can order medication by phone or online. You can also order your shopping online. Make sure you tell delivery drivers to leave items outside for collection if you order online. The delivery driver should not come into your home. If you are an employee and unable to work due to coronavirus (COVID-19), please refer to this guidance from the Department for Work and Pensions to find out about the support that is available to you. If you are living with children Keep following this advice to the best of your ability, however, we are aware that not all these measures will be possible. What we have seen so far is that children with coronavirus (COVID-19) appear to be less severely affected. It is nevertheless important to do your best to follow this guidance. 23/3/2020 "A small child clearly is a vulnerable individual, so in this case, although we are encouraging everybody to stay in their own households - that's the unit with the same risk exposure - clearly if you have adults who are unable to look after a small child, that is an exceptional circumstance. "If the individuals do not have access to care support, formal care support or to family, they will be able to work through their local authority hubs " there were TWO adults in that house.... one was clearly well enough to drive from london to durham (and back)... i don't think that exception applies!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours the rules were simple... anyone displaying symptoms and the WHOLE family stays at home.... partner and kids!!! his child could have already had it by the time they trotted them up north The guidelines at the time let this trip happen " I posted the guidelines above if you care to read. They say to isolate at home. There has been no suggestion that either Mr Cummings or his with actually had the virus let alone were incapacitated enough to require assistance. And if they were in such an unfortunate state were there any other options available rather than driving 250 miles and leaving thier child who was at very high risk of carrying the virus with other family members and exposing them? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours What about every other family in the country in similar positions?? Differant rules for Mr Cummings yes? His actions were stupid, these attempts to defend him are repugnant No if they have the same circumstances the guidelines allow you to do it, there is not a 2 tier system While you are staying at home, make sure you do the following things Stay at home You and all household members should remain at home. Do not go to work, school, or public areas, and do not use public transport or taxis. If possible, you should not go out even to buy food or other essentials, and any exercise should be taken within your home. The 14-day period starts from the day the first person in your house became ill. If you require help with buying groceries, other shopping or picking up medication, or walking a dog, you will need to ask friends or relatives. Alternatively, you can order medication by phone or online. You can also order your shopping online. Make sure you tell delivery drivers to leave items outside for collection if you order online. The delivery driver should not come into your home. If you are an employee and unable to work due to coronavirus (COVID-19), please refer to this guidance from the Department for Work and Pensions to find out about the support that is available to you. If you are living with children Keep following this advice to the best of your ability, however, we are aware that not all these measures will be possible. What we have seen so far is that children with coronavirus (COVID-19) appear to be less severely affected. It is nevertheless important to do your best to follow this guidance. 23/3/2020 "A small child clearly is a vulnerable individual, so in this case, although we are encouraging everybody to stay in their own households - that's the unit with the same risk exposure - clearly if you have adults who are unable to look after a small child, that is an exceptional circumstance. "If the individuals do not have access to care support, formal care support or to family, they will be able to work through their local authority hubs there were TWO adults in that house.... one was clearly well enough to drive from london to durham (and back)... i don't think that exception applies!!!!" They drove there and self isolated there for over a week/closer to two weeks and weren't in contact with the other family members | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours the rules were simple... anyone displaying symptoms and the WHOLE family stays at home.... partner and kids!!! his child could have already had it by the time they trotted them up north The guidelines at the time let this trip happen I posted the guidelines above if you care to read. They say to isolate at home. There has been no suggestion that either Mr Cummings or his with actually had the virus let alone were incapacitated enough to require assistance. And if they were in such an unfortunate state were there any other options available rather than driving 250 miles and leaving thier child who was at very high risk of carrying the virus with other family members and exposing them? " Today's guidelines and I also posted the admice of the DMO on the 23rd march before this incident | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Meanwhile, his wife wrote an article in the Spectator talking about their isolation in London. Guess she wasn't expecting to be discovered up north!" Call me cynical, but I'd say that they maybe knew the trip was indefensible..? The cover up is always worse than the crime | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours the rules were simple... anyone displaying symptoms and the WHOLE family stays at home.... partner and kids!!! his child could have already had it by the time they trotted them up north The guidelines at the time let this trip happen I posted the guidelines above if you care to read. They say to isolate at home. There has been no suggestion that either Mr Cummings or his with actually had the virus let alone were incapacitated enough to require assistance. And if they were in such an unfortunate state were there any other options available rather than driving 250 miles and leaving thier child who was at very high risk of carrying the virus with other family members and exposing them? " What other options is there without access to family | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours What about every other family in the country in similar positions?? Differant rules for Mr Cummings yes? His actions were stupid, these attempts to defend him are repugnant No if they have the same circumstances the guidelines allow you to do it, there is not a 2 tier system While you are staying at home, make sure you do the following things Stay at home You and all household members should remain at home. Do not go to work, school, or public areas, and do not use public transport or taxis. If possible, you should not go out even to buy food or other essentials, and any exercise should be taken within your home. The 14-day period starts from the day the first person in your house became ill. If you require help with buying groceries, other shopping or picking up medication, or walking a dog, you will need to ask friends or relatives. Alternatively, you can order medication by phone or online. You can also order your shopping online. Make sure you tell delivery drivers to leave items outside for collection if you order online. The delivery driver should not come into your home. If you are an employee and unable to work due to coronavirus (COVID-19), please refer to this guidance from the Department for Work and Pensions to find out about the support that is available to you. If you are living with children Keep following this advice to the best of your ability, however, we are aware that not all these measures will be possible. What we have seen so far is that children with coronavirus (COVID-19) appear to be less severely affected. It is nevertheless important to do your best to follow this guidance. 23/3/2020 "A small child clearly is a vulnerable individual, so in this case, although we are encouraging everybody to stay in their own households - that's the unit with the same risk exposure - clearly if you have adults who are unable to look after a small child, that is an exceptional circumstance. "If the individuals do not have access to care support, formal care support or to family, they will be able to work through their local authority hubs there were TWO adults in that house.... one was clearly well enough to drive from london to durham (and back)... i don't think that exception applies!!!! They drove there and self isolated there for over a week/closer to two weeks and weren't in contact with the other family members" That isn't the guidelines, these are https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus?gclid=CjwKCAjwk6P2BRAIEiwAfVJ0rJ85BRh3gnAyB7-25UurTf-YgWgu2peIBz_lM-zgvR5qz9gnca0yDxoC8gUQAvD_BwE | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family " The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... What about the child ? Can you explain how putting him in a car for 3 hours is protecting him from the virus ? It was before they really got into the heavy debilitating symptoms and putting him in a car to get cared for while both his parents then are unable to care for him for days not just a few hours What about every other family in the country in similar positions?? Differant rules for Mr Cummings yes? His actions were stupid, these attempts to defend him are repugnant No if they have the same circumstances the guidelines allow you to do it, there is not a 2 tier system While you are staying at home, make sure you do the following things Stay at home You and all household members should remain at home. Do not go to work, school, or public areas, and do not use public transport or taxis. If possible, you should not go out even to buy food or other essentials, and any exercise should be taken within your home. The 14-day period starts from the day the first person in your house became ill. If you require help with buying groceries, other shopping or picking up medication, or walking a dog, you will need to ask friends or relatives. Alternatively, you can order medication by phone or online. You can also order your shopping online. Make sure you tell delivery drivers to leave items outside for collection if you order online. The delivery driver should not come into your home. If you are an employee and unable to work due to coronavirus (COVID-19), please refer to this guidance from the Department for Work and Pensions to find out about the support that is available to you. If you are living with children Keep following this advice to the best of your ability, however, we are aware that not all these measures will be possible. What we have seen so far is that children with coronavirus (COVID-19) appear to be less severely affected. It is nevertheless important to do your best to follow this guidance. 23/3/2020 "A small child clearly is a vulnerable individual, so in this case, although we are encouraging everybody to stay in their own households - that's the unit with the same risk exposure - clearly if you have adults who are unable to look after a small child, that is an exceptional circumstance. "If the individuals do not have access to care support, formal care support or to family, they will be able to work through their local authority hubs there were TWO adults in that house.... one was clearly well enough to drive from london to durham (and back)... i don't think that exception applies!!!! They drove there and self isolated there for over a week/closer to two weeks and weren't in contact with the other family members That isn't the guidelines, these are https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus?gclid=CjwKCAjwk6P2BRAIEiwAfVJ0rJ85BRh3gnAyB7-25UurTf-YgWgu2peIBz_lM-zgvR5qz9gnca0yDxoC8gUQAvD_BwE" They are the guidelines now and not of the time, please look for them or the fact that the regulations allowed him to do that and quite easy to find using the NPCC and asking as it's days and not hours | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one" And if both parents have it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He is fine. It’s a free country. He is doing what he sees fit for his family just like anyone else. People need to mind their own. " He is at the top of a government telling people how to restrict thier lives, he is as accountable for hi s actions as you or I, that's how society works | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? " There are other options rather than driving 250 miles as stated in the guidance. Also, if both parents are symptomatic, leaving a child with potential high levels of exposure with uninfected people isn't particularly smart, now is it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? " He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? There are other options rather than driving 250 miles as stated in the guidance. Also, if both parents are symptomatic, leaving a child with potential high levels of exposure with uninfected people isn't particularly smart, now is it? " Did both have symptoms at the time of the drive? Or did they degrade after and was already isolating away from the family getting his sister to deliver shopping to them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Did both have symptoms at the time of the drive? " He didn't have any symptoms, he could have looked after his wife | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? There are other options rather than driving 250 miles as stated in the guidance. Also, if both parents are symptomatic, leaving a child with potential high levels of exposure with uninfected people isn't particularly smart, now is it? Did both have symptoms at the time of the drive? Or did they degrade after and was already isolating away from the family getting his sister to deliver shopping to them " He had symptoms . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home " So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" That isn't the guidelines, these are https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus?gclid=CjwKCAjwk6P2BRAIEiwAfVJ0rJ85BRh3gnAyB7-25UurTf-YgWgu2peIBz_lM-zgvR5qz9gnca0yDxoC8gUQAvD_BwE They are the guidelines now and not of the time, please look for them or the fact that the regulations allowed him to do that and quite easy to find using the NPCC and asking as it's days and not hours " When did the guidelines change? If you can find them can you put the link in please? what were the guidelines between lock down and 31st March? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Did both have symptoms at the time of the drive? He didn't have any symptoms, he could have looked after his wife " So he didn't have symptoms but could of developed them whilst looking after his wife thus neglecting alex, in that situation where you personally don't have symptoms but your partner does and she is bed ridden...... But you could also get that severity of symptoms where both parents are incapable of looking after your 4 year old...... What would you do? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" They drove there and self isolated there for over a week/closer to two weeks and weren't in contact with the other family members" They drove there so the grandparents could care for their son so obviously the child mixed with two people in their 70s despite possibly being a carrier. This is definitely outside the guidelines. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property" Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property " I would imagine any parent would call for help if they thought things where going down hill, so that their child could be looked after. Parents do this all the time when they are ill We could all twist the rules to suit, defending that action just makes people look silly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property I would imagine any parent would call for help if they thought things where going down hill, so that their child could be looked after. Parents do this all the time when they are ill We could all twist the rules to suit, defending that action just makes people look silly" So he called for help by driving and isolating away from the people helping | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think he’ll be more difficult to get rid of than Rasputin sadly. Love the analogy" I second that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? " Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Did both have symptoms at the time of the drive? He didn't have any symptoms, he could have looked after his wife So he didn't have symptoms but could of developed them whilst looking after his wife thus neglecting alex, in that situation where you personally don't have symptoms but your partner does and she is bed ridden...... But you could also get that severity of symptoms where both parents are incapable of looking after your 4 year old...... What would you do? " Clutching at straws springs to mind I answered what most parents do on your other post I quoted. Lets be honest here, there is no excuse to what he did and admitting it would have made him not look so much of an arse For me, if our grown up children had gotten the virus and our grandchildren needed looking after I would be breaking the rules and looking after them, but I would accept it wasn't what I should be doing and accept any slap on the wrist that came my way One of our children did get it who promised they would call if they thought it was getting any worse, happily it didn't, but we didn't break any rules " just in case " it went worse | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property I would imagine any parent would call for help if they thought things where going down hill, so that their child could be looked after. Parents do this all the time when they are ill We could all twist the rules to suit, defending that action just makes people look silly So he called for help by driving and isolating away from the people helping" Sometimes it seems pointless, this is one of those times | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here....." The child who was a potential Covid carrier infecting the grandparents??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" That isn't the guidelines, these are https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus?gclid=CjwKCAjwk6P2BRAIEiwAfVJ0rJ85BRh3gnAyB7-25UurTf-YgWgu2peIBz_lM-zgvR5qz9gnca0yDxoC8gUQAvD_BwE They are the guidelines now and not of the time, please look for them or the fact that the regulations allowed him to do that and quite easy to find using the NPCC and asking as it's days and not hours When did the guidelines change? If you can find them can you put the link in please? what were the guidelines between lock down and 31st March?" https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-stay-at-home-guidance/stay-at-home-guidance-for-households-with-possible-coronavirus-covid-19-infection Can't find the guidelines at the time but even ones updated on the 18th show he didn't break the rules This vitriol is partisan | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home " To add to this, the first post was right after all, if one has no symptoms and the only way to get supplies is for that person to go shopping they can, making sure they stick to all the precautions | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property I would imagine any parent would call for help if they thought things where going down hill, so that their child could be looked after. Parents do this all the time when they are ill We could all twist the rules to suit, defending that action just makes people look silly" . Indeed. Think you're defending the indefensible here lonewolf lol. His wife strongly gave the impression in her Spectator interview that they were isolating in London. Had they come clean and said they did what they did for the sake of their child they would have been better thought of. . Oh and there's no particular hatred of DC here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act " Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... The child who was a potential Covid carrier infecting the grandparents???" Potential...... Yes, did he, no | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... The child who was a potential Covid carrier infecting the grandparents??? Potential...... Yes, did he, no" Did Cummings have really bad symptoms when he set of to Durham? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? " They didn't know if they would become too ill better to not risk that though as too late and that poor child is fucked...... Your outlook is potential to neglect the kid in that situation... Interesting outlook to have | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" That isn't the guidelines, these are https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus?gclid=CjwKCAjwk6P2BRAIEiwAfVJ0rJ85BRh3gnAyB7-25UurTf-YgWgu2peIBz_lM-zgvR5qz9gnca0yDxoC8gUQAvD_BwE They are the guidelines now and not of the time, please look for them or the fact that the regulations allowed him to do that and quite easy to find using the NPCC and asking as it's days and not hours When did the guidelines change? If you can find them can you put the link in please? what were the guidelines between lock down and 31st March? https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-stay-at-home-guidance/stay-at-home-guidance-for-households-with-possible-coronavirus-covid-19-infection Can't find the guidelines at the time but even ones updated on the 18th show he didn't break the rules This vitriol is partisan " We didn't lock down until the 23rd March. The guidelines have been the same since that date. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... The child who was a potential Covid carrier infecting the grandparents??? Potential...... Yes, did he, no Did Cummings have really bad symptoms when he set of to Durham? " No | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" That isn't the guidelines, these are https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus?gclid=CjwKCAjwk6P2BRAIEiwAfVJ0rJ85BRh3gnAyB7-25UurTf-YgWgu2peIBz_lM-zgvR5qz9gnca0yDxoC8gUQAvD_BwE They are the guidelines now and not of the time, please look for them or the fact that the regulations allowed him to do that and quite easy to find using the NPCC and asking as it's days and not hours When did the guidelines change? If you can find them can you put the link in please? what were the guidelines between lock down and 31st March? https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-stay-at-home-guidance/stay-at-home-guidance-for-households-with-possible-coronavirus-covid-19-infection Can't find the guidelines at the time but even ones updated on the 18th show he didn't break the rules This vitriol is partisan We didn't lock down until the 23rd March. The guidelines have been the same since that date. " So then the guidelines allowed him to do it then as they do now, good to know | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" That isn't the guidelines, these are https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus?gclid=CjwKCAjwk6P2BRAIEiwAfVJ0rJ85BRh3gnAyB7-25UurTf-YgWgu2peIBz_lM-zgvR5qz9gnca0yDxoC8gUQAvD_BwE They are the guidelines now and not of the time, please look for them or the fact that the regulations allowed him to do that and quite easy to find using the NPCC and asking as it's days and not hours When did the guidelines change? If you can find them can you put the link in please? what were the guidelines between lock down and 31st March? https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-stay-at-home-guidance/stay-at-home-guidance-for-households-with-possible-coronavirus-covid-19-infection Can't find the guidelines at the time but even ones updated on the 18th show he didn't break the rules This vitriol is partisan " We didn't lock down until the 23rd March. The guidelines have been the same since that date. Pointing out the obvious is not vitriol. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" That isn't the guidelines, these are https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus?gclid=CjwKCAjwk6P2BRAIEiwAfVJ0rJ85BRh3gnAyB7-25UurTf-YgWgu2peIBz_lM-zgvR5qz9gnca0yDxoC8gUQAvD_BwE They are the guidelines now and not of the time, please look for them or the fact that the regulations allowed him to do that and quite easy to find using the NPCC and asking as it's days and not hours When did the guidelines change? If you can find them can you put the link in please? what were the guidelines between lock down and 31st March? https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-stay-at-home-guidance/stay-at-home-guidance-for-households-with-possible-coronavirus-covid-19-infection Can't find the guidelines at the time but even ones updated on the 18th show he didn't break the rules This vitriol is partisan We didn't lock down until the 23rd March. The guidelines have been the same since that date. So then the guidelines allowed him to do it then as they do now, good to know" I think you are just being silly now, the guidelines are the same as they have been since 23rd March. You should stay at home....ah never mind, crack on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? They didn't know if they would become too ill better to not risk that though as too late and that poor child is fucked...... Your outlook is potential to neglect the kid in that situation... Interesting outlook to have " So potentially it could lead to child neglect and potentially lead to infection of others (grandparents ) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... The child who was a potential Covid carrier infecting the grandparents??? Potential...... Yes, did he, no Did Cummings have really bad symptoms when he set of to Durham? No" Then why did he, his wife and child go to Durham? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? They didn't know if they would become too ill better to not risk that though as too late and that poor child is fucked...... Your outlook is potential to neglect the kid in that situation... Interesting outlook to have So potentially it could lead to child neglect and potentially lead to infection of others (grandparents ) " The and should be an or there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act " There has been no suggestion that the child was in any danger at the time they travelled. There were other options available for support at thier home, neighbours, friends, I'm pretty sure he has a P.A.. If they had been both seriously ill and unable to look after the child then that would be a different scanario, and steps could have been taken once that situation seemed likely. But that wasn't the case, and you seem quite determined to ignore these facts, and facts they are | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Everyone is forgetting the child in their vitriol hated for DC here..... The child who was a potential Covid carrier infecting the grandparents??? Potential...... Yes, did he, no Did Cummings have really bad symptoms when he set of to Durham? No Then why did he, his wife and child go to Durham? " The potential of him developing symptoms and neglecting Alexander, so he went to Durham to self isolate with his wife in a separate part of his family home whilst his sister and parents looked after Alex | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The and should be an or there " ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act There has been no suggestion that the child was in any danger at the time they travelled. There were other options available for support at thier home, neighbours, friends, I'm pretty sure he has a P.A.. If they had been both seriously ill and unable to look after the child then that would be a different scanario, and steps could have been taken once that situation seemed likely. But that wasn't the case, and you seem quite determined to ignore these facts, and facts they are" The facts are there was a potential to become severely ill and neglect Alex..... How aren't you getting this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? They didn't know if they would become too ill better to not risk that though as too late and that poor child is fucked...... Your outlook is potential to neglect the kid in that situation... Interesting outlook to have So potentially it could lead to child neglect and potentially lead to infection of others (grandparents ) The and should be an or there " Ah, I find it hilarious when people resort to correcting spelling and grammar when they are losing the argument . Care to answer the question Mr Wolf | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act There has been no suggestion that the child was in any danger at the time they travelled. There were other options available for support at thier home, neighbours, friends, I'm pretty sure he has a P.A.. If they had been both seriously ill and unable to look after the child then that would be a different scanario, and steps could have been taken once that situation seemed likely. But that wasn't the case, and you seem quite determined to ignore these facts, and facts they are" Same question if you personally don't have symptoms but your partner does and she is bed ridden...... But you could also get that severity of symptoms where both parents are incapable of looking after your 4 year old...... What would you do? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act There has been no suggestion that the child was in any danger at the time they travelled. There were other options available for support at thier home, neighbours, friends, I'm pretty sure he has a P.A.. If they had been both seriously ill and unable to look after the child then that would be a different scanario, and steps could have been taken once that situation seemed likely. But that wasn't the case, and you seem quite determined to ignore these facts, and facts they are The facts are there was a potential to become severely ill and neglect Alex..... How aren't you getting this " Was there potential to infect others ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? They didn't know if they would become too ill better to not risk that though as too late and that poor child is fucked...... Your outlook is potential to neglect the kid in that situation... Interesting outlook to have So potentially it could lead to child neglect and potentially lead to infection of others (grandparents ) The and should be an or there Ah, I find it hilarious when people resort to correcting spelling and grammar when they are losing the argument . Care to answer the question Mr Wolf " I did it is neglect of the child OR potential to infect his parents there isn't an and there as if he gave Alex to his parents then Alex isn't being neglected | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act There has been no suggestion that the child was in any danger at the time they travelled. There were other options available for support at thier home, neighbours, friends, I'm pretty sure he has a P.A.. If they had been both seriously ill and unable to look after the child then that would be a different scanario, and steps could have been taken once that situation seemed likely. But that wasn't the case, and you seem quite determined to ignore these facts, and facts they are Same question if you personally don't have symptoms but your partner does and she is bed ridden...... But you could also get that severity of symptoms where both parents are incapable of looking after your 4 year old...... What would you do? " Follow government advice , Stay at home, like everyone else did. Did they both have severe symptoms | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why couldn't Cummings and wife stay in London and sister look after Alex in another part of Durham house ?" So drive up to Durham to drop the kid off and drive back to London........ Or just drive up there and self isolate in a different property | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act There has been no suggestion that the child was in any danger at the time they travelled. There were other options available for support at thier home, neighbours, friends, I'm pretty sure he has a P.A.. If they had been both seriously ill and unable to look after the child then that would be a different scanario, and steps could have been taken once that situation seemed likely. But that wasn't the case, and you seem quite determined to ignore these facts, and facts they are Same question if you personally don't have symptoms but your partner does and she is bed ridden...... But you could also get that severity of symptoms where both parents are incapable of looking after your 4 year old...... What would you do? Follow government advice , Stay at home, like everyone else did. Did they both have severe symptoms " Government advice ALLOWS him to do what he did | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" That isn't the guidelines, these are https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus?gclid=CjwKCAjwk6P2BRAIEiwAfVJ0rJ85BRh3gnAyB7-25UurTf-YgWgu2peIBz_lM-zgvR5qz9gnca0yDxoC8gUQAvD_BwE They are the guidelines now and not of the time, please look for them or the fact that the regulations allowed him to do that and quite easy to find using the NPCC and asking as it's days and not hours When did the guidelines change? If you can find them can you put the link in please? what were the guidelines between lock down and 31st March? https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-stay-at-home-guidance/stay-at-home-guidance-for-households-with-possible-coronavirus-covid-19-infection Can't find the guidelines at the time but even ones updated on the 18th show he didn't break the rules This vitriol is partisan We didn't lock down until the 23rd March. The guidelines have been the same since that date. So then the guidelines allowed him to do it then as they do now, good to know I think you are just being silly now, the guidelines are the same as they have been since 23rd March. You should stay at home....ah never mind, crack on " https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/1023027#message_23676916 A quick question before I go do the gardening, you condemn this person in this thread for breaking the rules, why are you not condemning the person being discussed on this thread for breaking those same rules? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? They didn't know if they would become too ill better to not risk that though as too late and that poor child is fucked...... Your outlook is potential to neglect the kid in that situation... Interesting outlook to have So potentially it could lead to child neglect and potentially lead to infection of others (grandparents ) The and should be an or there Ah, I find it hilarious when people resort to correcting spelling and grammar when they are losing the argument . Care to answer the question Mr Wolf I did it is neglect of the child OR potential to infect his parents there isn't an and there as if he gave Alex to his parents then Alex isn't being neglected " Alex wasn’t being neglected in London ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? They didn't know if they would become too ill better to not risk that though as too late and that poor child is fucked...... Your outlook is potential to neglect the kid in that situation... Interesting outlook to have So potentially it could lead to child neglect and potentially lead to infection of others (grandparents ) The and should be an or there Ah, I find it hilarious when people resort to correcting spelling and grammar when they are losing the argument . Care to answer the question Mr Wolf I did it is neglect of the child OR potential to infect his parents there isn't an and there as if he gave Alex to his parents then Alex isn't being neglected Alex wasn’t being neglected in London ? " If both parents became unable to look after their kid in London then Alex would be neglected.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Government advice ALLOWS him to do what he did " So during lockdown anyone can say they are feeling a bit poorly and go along with their children to stay with grandparents or relatives for a couple of weeks ? The advice still clearly says no overnight visits. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? They didn't know if they would become too ill better to not risk that though as too late and that poor child is fucked...... Your outlook is potential to neglect the kid in that situation... Interesting outlook to have So potentially it could lead to child neglect and potentially lead to infection of others (grandparents ) The and should be an or there Ah, I find it hilarious when people resort to correcting spelling and grammar when they are losing the argument . Care to answer the question Mr Wolf I did it is neglect of the child OR potential to infect his parents there isn't an and there as if he gave Alex to his parents then Alex isn't being neglected Alex wasn’t being neglected in London ? If both parents became unable to look after their kid in London then Alex would be neglected...." If, could, potential ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To sum up my argument Dominic Mrs got ill, he didn't have symptoms but with the virus as it is he deemed it necessary, and within guidelines then and now, that the risk of him getting it and potential for bad symptoms (as we know it gives you) to go give Alex (vulnerable person in his household) to his sister/parents whilst they self isolated for weeks in a different part of the property." Does Alex have underlying health conditions? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home So stay at home and potentially both parents get symptoms so severe that the needs of the child aren't being met or give the child to his parents and both he and his wife self isolate at another part of the property Yes. How do you think thousands of families dealt with it when one of them became ill? Becoming ill with flu and this is a different kettle of fish and negligence to the child is against section 1 of the child act Was either parent unable to look after the child when they set off? How did they know that they would become too ill to look after their child? Was it Cummings mother’s birthday? They didn't know if they would become too ill better to not risk that though as too late and that poor child is fucked...... Your outlook is potential to neglect the kid in that situation... Interesting outlook to have So potentially it could lead to child neglect and potentially lead to infection of others (grandparents ) The and should be an or there Ah, I find it hilarious when people resort to correcting spelling and grammar when they are losing the argument . Care to answer the question Mr Wolf I did it is neglect of the child OR potential to infect his parents there isn't an and there as if he gave Alex to his parents then Alex isn't being neglected Alex wasn’t being neglected in London ? If both parents became unable to look after their kid in London then Alex would be neglected.... If, could, potential ? " Any parent would error on the side of caution when it comes to their child I would of thought and even if the potential was small to be unable to give a 4 year old the needs that it requires then it doesn't matter if the potential is miniscule. Im sure any parent would think the same with this virus | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To sum up my argument Dominic Mrs got ill, he didn't have symptoms but with the virus as it is he deemed it necessary, and within guidelines then and now, that the risk of him getting it and potential for bad symptoms (as we know it gives you) to go give Alex (vulnerable person in his household) to his sister/parents whilst they self isolated for weeks in a different part of the property. Does Alex have underlying health conditions? " Doesn't matter, classed as vulnerable by the government | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To sum up my argument Dominic Mrs got ill, he didn't have symptoms but with the virus as it is he deemed it necessary, and within guidelines then and now, that the risk of him getting it and potential for bad symptoms (as we know it gives you) to go give Alex (vulnerable person in his household) to his sister/parents whilst they self isolated for weeks in a different part of the property." So , he wasn’t ill at the time? He decided it was worth the risk of driving 250 miles to his elderly parents because he could ‘potentially’ catch the virus and ‘ if ‘ he became unwell it ‘could’ ‘potentially’ lead to Alex being neglected . Why didn’t he drive up with Alex alone then return to look after his sick wife | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To sum up my argument Dominic Mrs got ill, he didn't have symptoms but with the virus as it is he deemed it necessary, and within guidelines then and now, that the risk of him getting it and potential for bad symptoms (as we know it gives you) to go give Alex (vulnerable person in his household) to his sister/parents whilst they self isolated for weeks in a different part of the property. Does Alex have underlying health conditions? Doesn't matter, classed as vulnerable by the government" Children aren’t vulnerable. Hence schools being open. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To sum up my argument Dominic Mrs got ill, he didn't have symptoms but with the virus as it is he deemed it necessary, and within guidelines then and now, that the risk of him getting it and potential for bad symptoms (as we know it gives you) to go give Alex (vulnerable person in his household) to his sister/parents whilst they self isolated for weeks in a different part of the property. So , he wasn’t ill at the time? He decided it was worth the risk of driving 250 miles to his elderly parents because he could ‘potentially’ catch the virus and ‘ if ‘ he became unwell it ‘could’ ‘potentially’ lead to Alex being neglected . Why didn’t he drive up with Alex alone then return to look after his sick wife " He did have the virus like I said if there's a miniscule chance that he's not asymptomatic then the child comes first | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What other options is there without access to family The same as anyone else in that position, if one needs to go out for shopping when they come back they self isolate themselves from the infected one And if both parents have it? He didn't However thinking about this, he wouldn't have been able to go out either as he would be isolating for 14 days as the statement said he didn't have the virus In which case maybe the friend who gives him a lift to work who lives two doors away from him could have done? If not another friend one of them may have? Or a charity that are delivering food to people who can't get out? Or the Fire Brigade who are delivering essentials when people can't get out? I am guessing he should have done what we all would be expected to do? which is stay home " He also has other family who live in London......plenty other options. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To sum up my argument Dominic Mrs got ill, he didn't have symptoms but with the virus as it is he deemed it necessary, and within guidelines then and now, that the risk of him getting it and potential for bad symptoms (as we know it gives you) to go give Alex (vulnerable person in his household) to his sister/parents whilst they self isolated for weeks in a different part of the property." . Spectator magazine... Wakefield said that Cummings rushed home to look after her when she began showing symptoms. A day later he began feeling “weird” and then couldn’t get out of bed. “Day in, day out for 10 days he lay doggo with a high fever and spasms,” she said. Wakefield’s article does not say where they were during quarantine, but it adds: “After the uncertainty of the bug itself, we emerged from quarantine into almost comical uncertainty of London lockdown.” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Possibly asked to resign but will be brought back for the next election I guess" He’s going nowhere. Sycophantic Tory M.P.s and press will have his back. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To sum up my argument Dominic Mrs got ill, he didn't have symptoms but with the virus as it is he deemed it necessary, and within guidelines then and now, that the risk of him getting it and potential for bad symptoms (as we know it gives you) to go give Alex (vulnerable person in his household) to his sister/parents whilst they self isolated for weeks in a different part of the property. Does Alex have underlying health conditions? Doesn't matter, classed as vulnerable by the government" It wasn't within guidelines, the guidelines have always been the same even since before the lock down. If you have symptoms stay at home, if someone you live with has symptoms, stay at home longer It is is hypocritical to say one person should stick to the rules then say another person can bend them As this all happened on 31st March I am now wondering why it was released now ,so makes me think what is being hidden from todays news | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |