"I heard indirectly the clain from the government that they will not extend furlough payments. Have others seen that? "
They need to ramp it down from 80% to push firms to find ways to get back to work. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I heard indirectly the clain from the government that they will not extend furlough payments. Have others seen that?
They need to ramp it down from 80% to push firms to find ways to get back to work."
There will be a lot of people quite happy to sit at home on 80% of pay, The 20% loss in wages hasn’t made much of a difference on how live and I imagine a lot of other people as well |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I heard indirectly the clain from the government that they will not extend furlough payments. Have others seen that?
They need to ramp it down from 80% to push firms to find ways to get back to work.
There will be a lot of people quite happy to sit at home on 80% of pay, The 20% loss in wages hasn’t made much of a difference on how live and I imagine a lot of other people as well "
I wouldn't say happy to be sitting at home on 80% pay.
But it has brought a piece of mind for now.
Mr is on furlough .
Mrs works in a care home riddled with covid19.
We have both had it by the way. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
"I heard indirectly the clain from the government that they will not extend furlough payments. Have others seen that? "
I've seen this morning they will reduce it to 50% and then 30% because obviously keeping it at 80% is not sustainable. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I heard indirectly the clain from the government that they will not extend furlough payments. Have others seen that?
I've seen this morning they will reduce it to 50% and then 30% because obviously keeping it at 80% is not sustainable. "
If that's true then that will be when it hits the fan. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
"I heard indirectly the clain from the government that they will not extend furlough payments. Have others seen that?
I've seen this morning they will reduce it to 50% and then 30% because obviously keeping it at 80% is not sustainable.
If that's true then that will be when it hits the fan."
Sorry, it was the lib dems who have suggested that...
According to the Liberal Democrats there should be a “tapered” end to the programme, with the Treasury paying 50% of salaries for the first month after people return to work, falling to 30% after the third month, with employers picking up the full bill after the fourth.
Rishi Sunack is still working on a way to 'wind it down'.
They've got to though, it's costing roughly the same as the nhs, apparently. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I heard indirectly the clain from the government that they will not extend furlough payments. Have others seen that?
I've seen this morning they will reduce it to 50% and then 30% because obviously keeping it at 80% is not sustainable.
If that's true then that will be when it hits the fan.
Sorry, it was the lib dems who have suggested that...
According to the Liberal Democrats there should be a “tapered” end to the programme, with the Treasury paying 50% of salaries for the first month after people return to work, falling to 30% after the third month, with employers picking up the full bill after the fourth.
Rishi Sunack is still working on a way to 'wind it down'.
They've got to though, it's costing roughly the same as the nhs, apparently. "
Thank you for that information. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
