I know one could test negative and pop in the coop for milk on the way home and become infected but when lockdown eventually becomes more relaxed would a negative test result have any bearing on meeting for anyone?
Just wondering. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Personally I'd rather they already had it and if ever possible a positive antibody test 
I fear the country will be split into 2, those shielding and those recovered."
Totally agree. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
And let's be brutally honest, no fucker ever bent the truth before in order to dip their wick etc..
Fairly regularly on here someone falls for someone else then later finds they are attached to another..
Guess it's down to trust, you might trust them when they say they're negative and they may think they are as they have the text to say so but if they have picked it up post that test then you meet?
And yes respect that people will gladly meet and take the chance on catching it and getting through but do you then post meeting another isolate from loved ones who have underlying health issues, elderly relatives..?
Bit of a minefield.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *evaquitCouple
over a year ago
Catthorpe |
Was going to say a certificate to say you've had it and recovered is better than a negative test but can you imagine the criminals rolling the certificates out. A certificate with hidden detail like our passports that can only be seen under ultraviolet light are in order.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think you have to take responsibility for your own health and I wouldn’t rely on the word of others. A rest is only valid at the time of taking it. "
C'mon Babs..... there are long term good effects felt after a good rest. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
