FabSwingers.com > Forums > Virus > one rule for them and one for us
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 " You sound surprised? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He does have a more important job. So need to get back to work. " What's her job? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"my daughter is a frontline worker and not been tested" Michaels goves daughter takes priority I'm afraid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 " So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else." You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Her job is of no relevance.He was self isolating as his daughter was showing symptoms. Now she has been tested and given the all clear he can go back to work." I knew he was self isolating because of a family member. Didn't see a report that said was his daughter. Thanks for clearing that up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Guess I need to Google who Michael Goves is then.." Just Google incompetence..he will be near the top | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Her job is of no relevance.He was self isolating as his daughter was showing symptoms. Now she has been tested and given the all clear he can go back to work." Good news. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Being Gove's daughter is already a disgrace, shouldn't we be a little compassionate? " And her mum is a Daily Mail columnist. Six of One, half a dozen...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He’s part of the team that runs the country. And runs it fantastically well. Good bless him. May he continue as he has been for many a year to come. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Being Gove's daughter is already a disgrace, shouldn't we be a little compassionate? " What an odd thing to say - hope my daughter doesn't feel it's a 'disgrace' with me being her father | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested?" So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Being Gove's daughter is already a disgrace, shouldn't we be a little compassionate? What an odd thing to say - hope my daughter doesn't feel it's a 'disgrace' with me being her father " Yeah a very nasty comment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts!" Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He’s part of the team that runs the country. And runs it fantastically well. Good bless him. May he continue as he has been for many a year to come. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked" So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shes been tested so a working member of our current crisis team of government can go back to work... makes perfect sense. " Agreed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested?" I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. " So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus?" I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important." I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important?" I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The government needs to stay strong. We can’t have it falling apart like cheap furniture. He needs to get back to work. Lives depend on people like him as well as doctors " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested." But they don’t work in isolation. They need support and that includes people in government. So would you rather a cabinet member was unable to work? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"why can he not work from home technology the way it is governments in other countrys do video meetings ect" Because secret documents aren’t safe to send over unsecured networks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"why can he not work from home technology the way it is governments in other countrys do video meetings ect" I think he was self isolating? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested." No one is arguing with you mate you dont have to keep repeating yourself.Getting an important member of the cabinet back is important to whats hard to understand about that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"why can he not work from home technology the way it is governments in other countrys do video meetings ect Because secret documents aren’t safe to send over unsecured networks. " Yeah because we are using Chinese technology for our network infrastructure. Whose great idea was that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"why can he not work from home technology the way it is governments in other countrys do video meetings ect Because secret documents aren’t safe to send over unsecured networks. " I've used vc's regularly for work and meetings and they really are crap. Did you see today's briefing? The q&a session was abysmal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested. But they don’t work in isolation. They need support and that includes people in government. So would you rather a cabinet member was unable to work?" You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested. But they don’t work in isolation. They need support and that includes people in government. So would you rather a cabinet member was unable to work? You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about." There are a number of MP'S from different parties that have been tested. Some of which have been tested whilst at home. You can not just point the finger at one party. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested?" So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about." Sorry to jump in but isn't it a matter of volume testing? 1.3 million NHS workers and i think only 150K tests have been carried out so far. I'd also love to know how many of those are repetitive tests on the same people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist " Of course not. People with VIP status and their families should get preference while NHS personnel infect people rather than treat them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about. Sorry to jump in but isn't it a matter of volume testing? 1.3 million NHS workers and i think only 150K tests have been carried out so far. I'd also love to know how many of those are repetitive tests on the same people " I thought we were doing about 18 k tests a day now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested. But they don’t work in isolation. They need support and that includes people in government. So would you rather a cabinet member was unable to work? You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about." No, no. You’re avoiding my question. I agree that more testing should be done on NHS staff. So. I’ll ask again. Would you rather that a member of the cabinet was unable to work? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about. Sorry to jump in but isn't it a matter of volume testing? 1.3 million NHS workers and i think only 150K tests have been carried out so far. I'd also love to know how many of those are repetitive tests on the same people I thought we were doing about 18 k tests a day now?" But that would still take 70 days to test all and in theory people would need testing at least every week They really need to get up to the 100k per day target, which seems a long way off | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist " Apparently so..... Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern. As I'm often saying, trying to score cheap political points during an international crisis is, well, cheap..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Much like some other topics if you want to criticise the government, pick your battles because this really isnt one that can be won. Testing her means that a member of the cabinet can return to work without continuing to isolate for upto 14 days, there is an undeniable logic to that decision. On it's own merits, the decision to test Gove's daughter is perfectly justifiable and yes there should be enough kits to test frontline staff but equally this test doesnt significantly alter that lack of testing. " Nailed it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist Apparently so..... Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern. As I'm often saying, trying to score cheap political points during an international crisis is, well, cheap....." Do you mean Lenin over there? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern" This comment seems backed by a lot of prejudice and no evidence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it sound like they are saying they were given "special permission" to get his daughter tested.... in which case.... then i think the public has a right to be angry that she jumped the queue to be tested before NHS workers for example..... " Her father was self isolating as she daughter was showing symptoms. Now she has been tested and given the all clear he can go back to work. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern This comment seems backed by a lot of prejudice and no evidence." Just green arrow him and have a read. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a lot of this is agenda driven. so a lot of nhs staff haven't been tested, fine. a lot of bus drivers haven't either and many of them have died, who is beating the drum for them? this is the way it is. deal with it. if you haven't got symptoms a test is wasted on you. over 3000 firefighters are currently off and unable to work are all firefighters up and down the country going to be tested? no? oh wait yes. but only if your home is on fire. give it a rest. " The point is that everyone should be tested. Testing asymptomatic people is even more important. The problem is that this country is failing doing what, in other countries, is not that difficult. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it sound like they are saying they were given "special permission" to get his daughter tested.... in which case.... then i think the public has a right to be angry that she jumped the queue to be tested before NHS workers for example..... Her father was self isolating as she daughter was showing symptoms. Now she has been tested and given the all clear he can go back to work." Does he do work that he can't do from home? What's the forum title again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a lot of this is agenda driven. so a lot of nhs staff haven't been tested, fine. a lot of bus drivers haven't either and many of them have died, who is beating the drum for them? this is the way it is. deal with it. if you haven't got symptoms a test is wasted on you. over 3000 firefighters are currently off and unable to work are all firefighters up and down the country going to be tested? no? oh wait yes. but only if your home is on fire. give it a rest. The point is that everyone should be tested. Testing asymptomatic people is even more important. The problem is that this country is failing doing what, in other countries, is not that difficult." Please name one country that has tested 100% of its population. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist Apparently so..... Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern. As I'm often saying, trying to score cheap political points during an international crisis is, well, cheap....." As the labour party arent in power your post is irrelevant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it sound like they are saying they were given "special permission" to get his daughter tested.... in which case.... then i think the public has a right to be angry that she jumped the queue to be tested before NHS workers for example..... Her father was self isolating as she daughter was showing symptoms. Now she has been tested and given the all clear he can go back to work. Does he do work that he can't do from home? What's the forum title again?" I'm guessing there are some jobs that just can't be done from home. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a lot of this is agenda driven. so a lot of nhs staff haven't been tested, fine. a lot of bus drivers haven't either and many of them have died, who is beating the drum for them? this is the way it is. deal with it. if you haven't got symptoms a test is wasted on you. over 3000 firefighters are currently off and unable to work are all firefighters up and down the country going to be tested? no? oh wait yes. but only if your home is on fire. give it a rest. The point is that everyone should be tested. Testing asymptomatic people is even more important. The problem is that this country is failing doing what, in other countries, is not that difficult. Please name one country that has tested 100% of its population. " You don't need to test 100% of your population if everyone is under genuine quarantine. Germany was doing 500 000 tests a day with pressure to do more while we were barely able to do 8000 per week. That's a huge difference given both authorities had the same time to prepare. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist Apparently so..... Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern. As I'm often saying, trying to score cheap political points during an international crisis is, well, cheap..... As the labour party arent in power your post is irrelevant" Question for you. You're political hue, which colour? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Much like some other topics if you want to criticise the government, pick your battles because this really isnt one that can be won. Testing her means that a member of the cabinet can return to work without continuing to isolate for upto 14 days, there is an undeniable logic to that decision. On it's own merits, the decision to test Gove's daughter is perfectly justifiable and yes there should be enough kits to test frontline staff but equally this test doesnt significantly alter that lack of testing. " Yep suppose it's a bit like the 100k story. Thats not to say if I were the family of a dr or a nurse who had died through lack of ppe I'd be feeling slightly annoyed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a lot of this is agenda driven. so a lot of nhs staff haven't been tested, fine. a lot of bus drivers haven't either and many of them have died, who is beating the drum for them? this is the way it is. deal with it. if you haven't got symptoms a test is wasted on you. over 3000 firefighters are currently off and unable to work are all firefighters up and down the country going to be tested? no? oh wait yes. but only if your home is on fire. give it a rest. The point is that everyone should be tested. Testing asymptomatic people is even more important. The problem is that this country is failing doing what, in other countries, is not that difficult. Please name one country that has tested 100% of its population. " Reductio ad absurdum. Italy does 300000 tests per week, Germany does 500000 tests per week. How many tests did UK in the last 7 days? We don't even have a working a antibody test! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist Apparently so..... Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern. As I'm often saying, trying to score cheap political points during an international crisis is, well, cheap..... As the labour party arent in power your post is irrelevant Question for you. You're political hue, which colour?" Why does it matter? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a lot of this is agenda driven. so a lot of nhs staff haven't been tested, fine. a lot of bus drivers haven't either and many of them have died, who is beating the drum for them? this is the way it is. deal with it. if you haven't got symptoms a test is wasted on you. over 3000 firefighters are currently off and unable to work are all firefighters up and down the country going to be tested? no? oh wait yes. but only if your home is on fire. give it a rest. The point is that everyone should be tested. Testing asymptomatic people is even more important. The problem is that this country is failing doing what, in other countries, is not that difficult. Please name one country that has tested 100% of its population. You don't need to test 100% of your population if everyone is under genuine quarantine. Germany was doing 500 000 tests a day with pressure to do more while we were barely able to do 8000 per week. That's a huge difference given both authorities had the same time to prepare. " I know that. Our man said "The point is that everyone should be tested". I'm merely curious as to which country's have tested all of their population. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested. But they don’t work in isolation. They need support and that includes people in government. So would you rather a cabinet member was unable to work? You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about. No, no. You’re avoiding my question. I agree that more testing should be done on NHS staff. So. I’ll ask again. Would you rather that a member of the cabinet was unable to work?" Hmmmm. You accused me of avoiding your question.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" We don't even have a working a antibody test!" In fairness I don't think anyone does | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a lot of this is agenda driven. so a lot of nhs staff haven't been tested, fine. a lot of bus drivers haven't either and many of them have died, who is beating the drum for them? this is the way it is. deal with it. if you haven't got symptoms a test is wasted on you. over 3000 firefighters are currently off and unable to work are all firefighters up and down the country going to be tested? no? oh wait yes. but only if your home is on fire. give it a rest. " A lot of NHS staff havent been tested..no not fine actually. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it sound like they are saying they were given "special permission" to get his daughter tested.... in which case.... then i think the public has a right to be angry that she jumped the queue to be tested before NHS workers for example..... Her father was self isolating as she daughter was showing symptoms. Now she has been tested and given the all clear he can go back to work." under nhs 111 guidence, "showing symptoms" isn't enough.... now is she wasn't well enough that she had to go to hospital then she would get the test.... other than that they are not testing anyone and presuming if the symptoms stay with you for more than 7 days then you have it so again... "special permission" isn't going thru the normal procedures... thats queue jumping! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a lot of this is agenda driven. so a lot of nhs staff haven't been tested, fine. a lot of bus drivers haven't either and many of them have died, who is beating the drum for them? this is the way it is. deal with it. if you haven't got symptoms a test is wasted on you. over 3000 firefighters are currently off and unable to work are all firefighters up and down the country going to be tested? no? oh wait yes. but only if your home is on fire. give it a rest. The point is that everyone should be tested. Testing asymptomatic people is even more important. The problem is that this country is failing doing what, in other countries, is not that difficult. Please name one country that has tested 100% of its population. Reductio ad absurdum. Italy does 300000 tests per week, Germany does 500000 tests per week. How many tests did UK in the last 7 days? We don't even have a working a antibody test!" Italy and Germany haven't tested their entire population either then. Shocking. Truly shocking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist Apparently so..... Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern. As I'm often saying, trying to score cheap political points during an international crisis is, well, cheap..... As the labour party arent in power your post is irrelevant Question for you. You're political hue, which colour? Why does it matter?" I feel it's relevant to the tone and hyperbole of your posts. But no, it's doesn't matter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested. But they don’t work in isolation. They need support and that includes people in government. So would you rather a cabinet member was unable to work? You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about. No, no. You’re avoiding my question. I agree that more testing should be done on NHS staff. So. I’ll ask again. Would you rather that a member of the cabinet was unable to work? Hmmmm. You accused me of avoiding your question...." I was getting to you. Personally I think doctors and nurses should be the uttermost priority and I appreciate there is a lot more of them to be tested. However as the other posted pointed out we are on a loser here..so yes I appreciate a member of a gmnt has to be tested. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"a lot of this is agenda driven. so a lot of nhs staff haven't been tested, fine. a lot of bus drivers haven't either and many of them have died, who is beating the drum for them? this is the way it is. deal with it. if you haven't got symptoms a test is wasted on you. over 3000 firefighters are currently off and unable to work are all firefighters up and down the country going to be tested? no? oh wait yes. but only if your home is on fire. give it a rest. The point is that everyone should be tested. Testing asymptomatic people is even more important. The problem is that this country is failing doing what, in other countries, is not that difficult. Please name one country that has tested 100% of its population. Reductio ad absurdum. Italy does 300000 tests per week, Germany does 500000 tests per week. How many tests did UK in the last 7 days? We don't even have a working a antibody test! Italy and Germany haven't tested their entire population either then. Shocking. Truly shocking." Ergo. UK infinitely MORE shocking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist Apparently so..... Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern. As I'm often saying, trying to score cheap political points during an international crisis is, well, cheap..... As the labour party arent in power your post is irrelevant Question for you. You're political hue, which colour? Why does it matter? I feel it's relevant to the tone and hyperbole of your posts. But no, it's doesn't matter." I didnt bring up the completely irrelevant..oh labour wouldnt do any better argument. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested. But they don’t work in isolation. They need support and that includes people in government. So would you rather a cabinet member was unable to work? You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about. No, no. You’re avoiding my question. I agree that more testing should be done on NHS staff. So. I’ll ask again. Would you rather that a member of the cabinet was unable to work? Hmmmm. You accused me of avoiding your question.... I was getting to you. Personally I think doctors and nurses should be the uttermost priority and I appreciate there is a lot more of them to be tested. However as the other posted pointed out we are on a loser here..so yes I appreciate a member of a gmnt has to be tested." Thank you. Probably the first and last time I’ll win an argument with you so I’ll savour it! No hard feelings. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it sound like they are saying they were given "special permission" to get his daughter tested.... in which case.... then i think the public has a right to be angry that she jumped the queue to be tested before NHS workers for example..... Her father was self isolating as she daughter was showing symptoms. Now she has been tested and given the all clear he can go back to work. under nhs 111 guidence, "showing symptoms" isn't enough.... now is she wasn't well enough that she had to go to hospital then she would get the test.... other than that they are not testing anyone and presuming if the symptoms stay with you for more than 7 days then you have it so again... "special permission" isn't going thru the normal procedures... thats queue jumping! " So..should she have been tested? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked So are you saying she shouldn’t have been tested? I'm saying nurses and drs should have been at the front of the queue. So a member of the cabinet isn’t an important part of the whole fight against the virus? I'm saying drs and nurses who actually save people's lives are important. I’m not saying they’re not. Is the a member of the cabinet not important? I'm saying drs and nurses are important..drs and nurses..who .what..3 months into this situation have still not been tested. But they don’t work in isolation. They need support and that includes people in government. So would you rather a cabinet member was unable to work? You are avoiding my question.I appreciate the gmnt needs to be checked but the fact that 1000s of nhs staff are still waiting is shocking. I think that's the part of the story that people are annoyed about. No, no. You’re avoiding my question. I agree that more testing should be done on NHS staff. So. I’ll ask again. Would you rather that a member of the cabinet was unable to work? Hmmmm. You accused me of avoiding your question.... I was getting to you. Personally I think doctors and nurses should be the uttermost priority and I appreciate there is a lot more of them to be tested. However as the other posted pointed out we are on a loser here..so yes I appreciate a member of a gmnt has to be tested. Thank you. Probably the first and last time I’ll win an argument with you so I’ll savour it! No hard feelings. " You better get that framed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist Apparently so..... Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern. As I'm often saying, trying to score cheap political points during an international crisis is, well, cheap..... As the labour party arent in power your post is irrelevant Question for you. You're political hue, which colour? Why does it matter? I feel it's relevant to the tone and hyperbole of your posts. But no, it's doesn't matter. I didnt bring up the completely irrelevant..oh labour wouldnt do any better argument. " I'm not suggesting Labour wouldn't do any better. I seriously doubt any party would have handled this differently. So, back to my question, which colour....? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debates are often televised anyway, Cabinate meetings are different. " Cabinet even | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debates are often televised anyway, Cabinate meetings are different. " If we have no secure way of communicating with each other than face to face then that is yet another failing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52128502 Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is calling on the government to allow a "virtual Parliament" so that MPs can take part in debates from home when the Commons returns to work, still expected later this month. This post does two things. It take the argument that politicians can't work from home and that the internet is too unsecured for the same...... and kicks them both out the park." House of commons only ever seems to have a handful of people there most of the time. I'm sure a zoom meeting can handle that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So no one else can be tested until the entire NHS has been tested first otherwise people will get their knickers in a twist Apparently so..... Of course if the Labour party were in power our man here would have nothing to moan about. So many of his posts appear determined by political hue, as opposed to real concern. As I'm often saying, trying to score cheap political points during an international crisis is, well, cheap..... As the labour party arent in power your post is irrelevant Question for you. You're political hue, which colour? Why does it matter? I feel it's relevant to the tone and hyperbole of your posts. But no, it's doesn't matter. I didnt bring up the completely irrelevant..oh labour wouldnt do any better argument. I'm not suggesting Labour wouldn't do any better. I seriously doubt any party would have handled this differently. So, back to my question, which colour....?" Some things are best left to the imagination | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debates are often televised anyway, Cabinate meetings are different. If we have no secure way of communicating with each other than face to face then that is yet another failing. " There are secure, end to end encrypted, means of communicating, in plenty of institutions. It’s just unfortunate that most people don’t have these options in their homes. Incidentally, whose failing is it? The ruling party? The security services? The telecoms networks? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52128502 Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is calling on the government to allow a "virtual Parliament" so that MPs can take part in debates from home when the Commons returns to work, still expected later this month. This post does two things. It take the argument that politicians can't work from home and that the internet is too unsecured for the same...... and kicks them both out the park. House of commons only ever seems to have a handful of people there most of the time. I'm sure a zoom meeting can handle that." If politicians need to talk face to face because the internet isn't safe enough. Then its the same for corporations to be discussing the trade secrets over the internet. What's the thread title again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" House of commons only ever seems to have a handful of people there most of the time. I'm sure a zoom meeting can handle that." house of commons for the 10 days before recess had been holding all select committee hearings via video link anyway... also... both scottish parliament and welsh assembly have been holding debates and FMQ's via video link..... so its not something that can't be done! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52128502 Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is calling on the government to allow a "virtual Parliament" so that MPs can take part in debates from home when the Commons returns to work, still expected later this month. This post does two things. It take the argument that politicians can't work from home and that the internet is too unsecured for the same...... and kicks them both out the park." It's an interesting idea but how would you be able to see all 650 MP's on your desk to PC? To ask a question the MP stands up and the speaker they choses who asks the next question. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debates are often televised anyway, Cabinate meetings are different. If we have no secure way of communicating with each other than face to face then that is yet another failing. There are secure, end to end encrypted, means of communicating, in plenty of institutions. It’s just unfortunate that most people don’t have these options in their homes. Incidentally, whose failing is it? The ruling party? The security services? The telecoms networks? " I don't think in those terms. If there's a problem then it meeds to be fixed. Assigning blame never fixed anything. If parliamentarians don't have secure internet then who needs to fix that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52128502 Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is calling on the government to allow a "virtual Parliament" so that MPs can take part in debates from home when the Commons returns to work, still expected later this month. This post does two things. It take the argument that politicians can't work from home and that the internet is too unsecured for the same...... and kicks them both out the park. It's an interesting idea but how would you be able to see all 650 MP's on your desk to PC? To ask a question the MP stands up and the speaker they choses who asks the next question. " You can click the “raise your hand” button in zoom, which alerts the meeting organiser you have a question. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debates are often televised anyway, Cabinate meetings are different. If we have no secure way of communicating with each other than face to face then that is yet another failing. There are secure, end to end encrypted, means of communicating, in plenty of institutions. It’s just unfortunate that most people don’t have these options in their homes. Incidentally, whose failing is it? The ruling party? The security services? The telecoms networks? I don't think in those terms. If there's a problem then it meeds to be fixed. Assigning blame never fixed anything. If parliamentarians don't have secure internet then who needs to fix that?" Oh it’s just that you said “it’s a failing”, I assumed you meant of someone/a group in particular. To have a fully secure means of discussing stuff which may be classed as classified, I would think they need dedicated lines, rather than the internet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52128502 Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is calling on the government to allow a "virtual Parliament" so that MPs can take part in debates from home when the Commons returns to work, still expected later this month. This post does two things. It take the argument that politicians can't work from home and that the internet is too unsecured for the same...... and kicks them both out the park. It's an interesting idea but how would you be able to see all 650 MP's on your desk to PC? To ask a question the MP stands up and the speaker they choses who asks the next question. " Whether virtual parliament will be effective isn't the issue. It's a question of whether it's absolutely necessary for them to leave their homes. All the arguments opposed have been pretty feeble considering our NHS personnel lives are at stake. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He’s part of the team that runs the country. And runs it fantastically well. Good bless him. May he continue as he has been for many a year to come. " Must be drinking a lot at home! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52128502 Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is calling on the government to allow a "virtual Parliament" so that MPs can take part in debates from home when the Commons returns to work, still expected later this month. This post does two things. It take the argument that politicians can't work from home and that the internet is too unsecured for the same...... and kicks them both out the park. It's an interesting idea but how would you be able to see all 650 MP's on your desk to PC? To ask a question the MP stands up and the speaker they choses who asks the next question. You can click the “raise your hand” button in zoom, which alerts the meeting organiser you have a question. " You could automate functions with buttons for. - mumble mumble - here here - phillibust for 5, 10, 20 minutes - cheer when NHS pay rise bills are defeated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debates are often televised anyway, Cabinate meetings are different. If we have no secure way of communicating with each other than face to face then that is yet another failing. There are secure, end to end encrypted, means of communicating, in plenty of institutions. It’s just unfortunate that most people don’t have these options in their homes. Incidentally, whose failing is it? The ruling party? The security services? The telecoms networks? I don't think in those terms. If there's a problem then it meeds to be fixed. Assigning blame never fixed anything. If parliamentarians don't have secure internet then who needs to fix that? Oh it’s just that you said “it’s a failing”, I assumed you meant of someone/a group in particular. To have a fully secure means of discussing stuff which may be classed as classified, I would think they need dedicated lines, rather than the internet. " Something that should already be in place. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debates are often televised anyway, Cabinate meetings are different. If we have no secure way of communicating with each other than face to face then that is yet another failing. There are secure, end to end encrypted, means of communicating, in plenty of institutions. It’s just unfortunate that most people don’t have these options in their homes. Incidentally, whose failing is it? The ruling party? The security services? The telecoms networks? I don't think in those terms. If there's a problem then it meeds to be fixed. Assigning blame never fixed anything. If parliamentarians don't have secure internet then who needs to fix that? Oh it’s just that you said “it’s a failing”, I assumed you meant of someone/a group in particular. To have a fully secure means of discussing stuff which may be classed as classified, I would think they need dedicated lines, rather than the internet. Something that should already be in place. " lol if only it were that simple. For the record, I’m sure he can conduct 95% of his job from home. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts!" Let's try not to get bitchy? Obviously the privileged people will always pull strings to get priority? It's just a fact of life? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He’s part of the team that runs the country. And runs it fantastically well. Good bless him. May he continue as he has been for many a year to come. " Fantastically well.....you do realise that Gove is a proven liar?? Again, more evidence of just overlooking the truth when it suits you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debates are often televised anyway, Cabinate meetings are different. If we have no secure way of communicating with each other than face to face then that is yet another failing. There are secure, end to end encrypted, means of communicating, in plenty of institutions. It’s just unfortunate that most people don’t have these options in their homes. Incidentally, whose failing is it? The ruling party? The security services? The telecoms networks? I don't think in those terms. If there's a problem then it meeds to be fixed. Assigning blame never fixed anything. If parliamentarians don't have secure internet then who needs to fix that? Oh it’s just that you said “it’s a failing”, I assumed you meant of someone/a group in particular. To have a fully secure means of discussing stuff which may be classed as classified, I would think they need dedicated lines, rather than the internet. Something that should already be in place. lol if only it were that simple. For the record, I’m sure he can conduct 95% of his job from home. " If all our NHS people were being tested regularly then I would have nothing to say on this. I just think it's no use to stand outside and clap for them and then have them at the back of the queue for testing. That we are having to prioritise testing at this level is a position we shouldn't be in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" This is funny. " How many people have to die per day for this to stop being funny, and for it to be acceptable to question the government policy? We're at 1000. Can we start asking questions at 2000 dead a day, 10,000 dead a day? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" This is funny. " He isn't a liar. Jeez, you like being lied to then? It's no surprise to see people doing the most utterly mind bending contortions to believe what they want. You are not alone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" This is funny. How many people have to die per day for this to stop being funny, and for it to be acceptable to question the government policy? We're at 1000. Can we start asking questions at 2000 dead a day, 10,000 dead a day? " That's a very complex question. I think you need to start with simple question.... like why don't you use reply + quote? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The government needs to stay strong. We can’t have it falling apart like cheap furniture. He needs to get back to work. Lives depend on people like him as well as doctors " Totally agree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's the amount of money you you have. Money talks as they say." My money talks. But all it ever says to me is "Goodbye"... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see nothing wrong with it A lot of the looney left have been spreading false stories and anti government rhetoric at the moment." I'm so glad that there is no political hue here... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see nothing wrong with it A lot of the looney left have been spreading false stories and anti government rhetoric at the moment." How many daily deaths do you think we need to get to before we're allowed to question the government policy? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He’s part of the team that runs the country. And runs it fantastically well. Good bless him. May he continue as he has been for many a year to come. " Everything has being going like clockwork. 10 years of austerity, running the NHS down, voting against pay rises for NHS staff. Unlike Life of Brian, when someone asks what the Tory’s have done for us, in the case the answer will be they have screwed us all & not one aquaduct! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"At work i can get tested any time i like too. Just open my mouth and get swabbed, done. But logistically there is no point. If i see a patient with covid or susoecrex the team snd myself with put all the clobber on. If i have no symptoms there is no point testing me. I will only be in with another parient with suspected covid an hour later. What do i do, get tested again? Lol" Keep up the good work mate. How’s the PPE Situation? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"At work i can get tested any time i like too. Just open my mouth and get swabbed, done. But logistically there is no point. If i see a patient with covid or susoecrex the team snd myself with put all the clobber on. If i have no symptoms there is no point testing me. I will only be in with another parient with suspected covid an hour later. What do i do, get tested again? Lol" It's a fair argument. Perhaps you can tell us. How soon after a person becomes infected do they start "shedding"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see nothing wrong with it A lot of the looney left have been spreading false stories and anti government rhetoric at the moment. How many daily deaths do you think we need to get to before we're allowed to question the government policy?" You can question when ever you like for me. I just think in unprecedented times when there is no real consensous of how to tackle this pandemic it can just come across as cheap point scoring at times. Plus what always horrifies me is where would we be with A government with Diana Abbot in it with all her mathematical wizardry Each to their own though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see nothing wrong with it A lot of the looney left have been spreading false stories and anti government rhetoric at the moment. How many daily deaths do you think we need to get to before we're allowed to question the government policy? You can question when ever you like for me. I just think in unprecedented times when there is no real consensous of how to tackle this pandemic it can just come across as cheap point scoring at times. Plus what always horrifies me is where would we be with A government with Diana Abbot in it with all her mathematical wizardry Each to their own though" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority " This democracy lark is a bugger huh? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Really - Is that the same team that 1. Knew we had Covid cases in february and did nothing 2. Didn't get the appropriate safety gear fro our hospitals 3. Cheered at not giving NHS workers a pay rise 4. Lost over 1/3 of nurses at ST Thomas's (We know 3 staff members there who confirm this - don't know about other hospitals) through Brexit 5. Encouraged people to go to pubs with the budget and then backtracked 6. Shook hands with Covid 19 patients and said it could not be spread by asymptomatic patients and then caught it 7. Said it was no more damaging than the flu 8. Is only counting people that die in hospital (and encouraging ill people to die at home) in its statistics - unfortunately the idiot majority who have absolutely no idea that Germany and China with much larger populations and yet far, far fewer deaths because they actually have people that can govern elected - still believe that our government are doing a good job? sorry what planet did you just come from?" They come from planet NineYearsOfBrainwashing in a galaxy far far away... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked" A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority This democracy lark is a bugger huh? " Don’t forget that we were all hoodwinked though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority This democracy lark is a bugger huh? " Is that the only part of that post that registered? At least with all these deaths there is still a time to gloat... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see nothing wrong with it A lot of the looney left have been spreading false stories and anti government rhetoric at the moment. How many daily deaths do you think we need to get to before we're allowed to question the government policy? You can question when ever you like for me. I just think in unprecedented times when there is no real consensous of how to tackle this pandemic it can just come across as cheap point scoring at times. Plus what always horrifies me is where would we be with A government with Diana Abbot in it with all her mathematical wizardry Each to their own though" Nice little kick to someone who isn't in Government and has no responsibility in any way for this crisis. Deflection is a weakness of arguement. Collective responsibility of Cabinet government means technically all the Cabinet have responsibility for the crisis. Currently they appear rudderless. As far as I understand there is still not enough PPE and Hancock took a swipe at NHS staff about it's use. Perhaps concentrating on the facts could be more illuminating | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it always the same faces always wanting to make a big deal when anyone from our government have some kind of curveball. So agreed doctors and nurses should be tested. But so should Goves daughter, he is very much a part of the UK getting out this mess. So thus anyone round him that should have this virus must be tested to ensure that the government can work as a complete unit. " You can't see the other faces... Because their heads are in the sand | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see nothing wrong with it A lot of the looney left have been spreading false stories and anti government rhetoric at the moment. How many daily deaths do you think we need to get to before we're allowed to question the government policy? You can question when ever you like for me. I just think in unprecedented times when there is no real consensous of how to tackle this pandemic it can just come across as cheap point scoring at times. Plus what always horrifies me is where would we be with A government with Diana Abbot in it with all her mathematical wizardry Each to their own though" You seem to contradict your earlier point about "loony left". And no idea what Dianne Abbott has to do with being allowed to question government policy without being attacked. Also, not everyone who wants the government to perform well at the time of crisis is "loony left". We're from all over the political spectrum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority This democracy lark is a bugger huh? Is that the only part of that post that registered? At least with all these deaths there is still a time to gloat... " No, no. I read the whole post. Some I agreed with, some I didn’t. But I do detest those who engage in political debate who think that a different view equates to someone as an ‘idiot’ or as you put it ‘brainwashed’. It’s a special kind of arrogance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority This democracy lark is a bugger huh? Is that the only part of that post that registered? At least with all these deaths there is still a time to gloat... No, no. I read the whole post. Some I agreed with, some I didn’t. But I do detest those who engage in political debate who think that a different view equates to someone as an ‘idiot’ or as you put it ‘brainwashed’. It’s a special kind of arrogance. " I think the fact that it's a criticism of government doesn't make it a politically motivated argument. If someone does something wrong. It's wrong regardless. Saying something is right when it's clearly wrong is just as equally arguably due to political bias. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority This democracy lark is a bugger huh? Is that the only part of that post that registered? At least with all these deaths there is still a time to gloat... No, no. I read the whole post. Some I agreed with, some I didn’t. But I do detest those who engage in political debate who think that a different view equates to someone as an ‘idiot’ or as you put it ‘brainwashed’. It’s a special kind of arrogance. I think the fact that it's a criticism of government doesn't make it a politically motivated argument. If someone does something wrong. It's wrong regardless. Saying something is right when it's clearly wrong is just as equally arguably due to political bias." No, but the ‘idiot majority’ and ‘brainwashed’ aren’t criticisms of government are they? And because someone’s wrong on one thing doesn’t mean they’re wrong on everything. Indeed, with reference to government, if you believe everything is wrong then arguably you’ve got to be looking at it solely through political bias. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority This democracy lark is a bugger huh? Is that the only part of that post that registered? At least with all these deaths there is still a time to gloat... No, no. I read the whole post. Some I agreed with, some I didn’t. But I do detest those who engage in political debate who think that a different view equates to someone as an ‘idiot’ or as you put it ‘brainwashed’. It’s a special kind of arrogance. " At the risk of being pedantic you can't use quotes there. But if don't think that a predominantly right wing newspaper dictates the sentiment of the nation then find me a country without a predominantly right wing press with a left wing government. I can agree with you that people who jump on the political bandwagon to milk the deaths of others are despicable. A good example of that was the politician who used the Tower Bridge attack for his election campaign after the parents of one of the victims begged politicians not to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority This democracy lark is a bugger huh? Is that the only part of that post that registered? At least with all these deaths there is still a time to gloat... No, no. I read the whole post. Some I agreed with, some I didn’t. But I do detest those who engage in political debate who think that a different view equates to someone as an ‘idiot’ or as you put it ‘brainwashed’. It’s a special kind of arrogance. I think the fact that it's a criticism of government doesn't make it a politically motivated argument. If someone does something wrong. It's wrong regardless. Saying something is right when it's clearly wrong is just as equally arguably due to political bias. No, but the ‘idiot majority’ and ‘brainwashed’ aren’t criticisms of government are they? And because someone’s wrong on one thing doesn’t mean they’re wrong on everything. Indeed, with reference to government, if you believe everything is wrong then arguably you’ve got to be looking at it solely through political bias. " So with that point of view anyone who criticised Hitler, for example was simply against National Socialism? Anyone who criticised Stalin was against communism? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Plus what always horrifies me is where would we be with A government with Diana Abbot in it with all her mathematical wizardry Each to their own though" a) now you made it political... b) you must have missed priti patel's mathematical gymnastics on saturday........ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Plus what always horrifies me is where would we be with A government with Diana Abbot in it with all her mathematical wizardry Each to their own though a) now you made it political... b) you must have missed priti patel's mathematical gymnastics on saturday........" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority This democracy lark is a bugger huh? Is that the only part of that post that registered? At least with all these deaths there is still a time to gloat... No, no. I read the whole post. Some I agreed with, some I didn’t. But I do detest those who engage in political debate who think that a different view equates to someone as an ‘idiot’ or as you put it ‘brainwashed’. It’s a special kind of arrogance. I think the fact that it's a criticism of government doesn't make it a politically motivated argument. If someone does something wrong. It's wrong regardless. Saying something is right when it's clearly wrong is just as equally arguably due to political bias." I agree someone to your pint but I think we disagree that some criticism is not politically motivated. I hope this is starting to come through a little. I certainly ave critism of some of the handling of this crisis. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Plus what always horrifies me is where would we be with A government with Diana Abbot in it with all her mathematical wizardry Each to their own though a) now you made it political... b) you must have missed priti patel's mathematical gymnastics on saturday........" a) Guilty as charged b) Ohhh fill me in, I have not seen this as I have been on nights!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" the idiot majority This democracy lark is a bugger huh? Is that the only part of that post that registered? At least with all these deaths there is still a time to gloat... No, no. I read the whole post. Some I agreed with, some I didn’t. But I do detest those who engage in political debate who think that a different view equates to someone as an ‘idiot’ or as you put it ‘brainwashed’. It’s a special kind of arrogance. I think the fact that it's a criticism of government doesn't make it a politically motivated argument. If someone does something wrong. It's wrong regardless. Saying something is right when it's clearly wrong is just as equally arguably due to political bias. I agree someone to your pint but I think we disagree that some criticism is not politically motivated. I hope this is starting to come through a little. I certainly ave critism of some of the handling of this crisis. " No one said some of it wasn't politically motivated. It isn't all politically motivated. My point is that people needlessly dying should be a problem for EVERYONE regardless of their political allegiances. If you have some criticism of the handling of this crisis that shows you are open minded. Nice. Now who did that handling? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"“Nice little kick to someone who isn't in Government and has no responsibility in any way for this crisis. Deflection is a weakness of argument” No idea what you are trying to get at with that line. I think I know what you are trying to say about deflection (I think). “You seem to contradict your earlier point about "loony left". And no idea what Dianne Abbott has to do with being allowed to question government policy without being attacked” Has the government handled this well? Only history will judge them I guess and do think it is a very unique challenge and unprecedented times. As for my point about the “looney left”, I have many friends/collages who say the most ridicules things about this current government and posting them on other platforms (not on here) clearly false stories and petty political point scoring. This a jibe really so if it comes across as an attack I apologies for the tone I can see why you think there is a contraction, but people are free to voice their views, and rightly so. However when some people just critise virtually everything it can come across as very politically motivated especially when the evidence or claim they make is weak or false, if you know what I mean? The Diane Abott comment is not defection, or certainly the authorial intent was not so. The point was meant to be, whatever your thoughts of this current cabinet is, it is my opinion (and it is only an opinion) is that the present lot are the lessor of the two evils compared to McDonnell, Corbyn, Thornberry and Abbott. I just think this pandemic in their hands would be a catastrophe. This is pure speculation on my part. This post reads a bit muddles, I tried to address to may points in one sitting I feel. " The point about using phrases like "loony left" is that it weakens any argument. As soon as you start labelling people who express dissent as "loony left" you start trying to attack people's character instead of their argument. By death counts, the government doesn't seem to be doing a good job. And maybe not you, but there are plenty of people round here who jump on you as soon as you question government policy, as if 1000 people dying a day isn't enough reason to start asking questions. I have no opinion on any speculation regarding how Labour would be possibly handing this should the maybe have won the last GE. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK then. Can someone please explain to me WHY we have have a higher rate of death in the UK than anywhere else in Europe?" I am still waiting for someone to answer this. What has caused our exceptionally high tragic loss of life? What is it? Something in the water? The Gulf Stream? Genetics? Please. I am asking for a reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. " Makes sense to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. Makes sense to me." Doesn't make sense to me. Firstly "the whole world" isn't clamouring for PPE. Many countries have this virus under control. Something that isn't being spoken about for obvious reasons. Secondly we have a powerful currency. Why are we struggling to compete to buy PPE? Why does the excuse for this keep changing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"“Nice little kick to someone who isn't in Government and has no responsibility in any way for this crisis. Deflection is a weakness of argument” No idea what you are trying to get at with that line. I think I know what you are trying to say about deflection (I think). “You seem to contradict your earlier point about "loony left". And no idea what Dianne Abbott has to do with being allowed to question government policy without being attacked” Has the government handled this well? Only history will judge them I guess and do think it is a very unique challenge and unprecedented times. As for my point about the “looney left”, I have many friends/collages who say the most ridicules things about this current government and posting them on other platforms (not on here) clearly false stories and petty political point scoring. This a jibe really so if it comes across as an attack I apologies for the tone I can see why you think there is a contraction, but people are free to voice their views, and rightly so. However when some people just critise virtually everything it can come across as very politically motivated especially when the evidence or claim they make is weak or false, if you know what I mean? The Diane Abott comment is not defection, or certainly the authorial intent was not so. The point was meant to be, whatever your thoughts of this current cabinet is, it is my opinion (and it is only an opinion) is that the present lot are the lessor of the two evils compared to McDonnell, Corbyn, Thornberry and Abbott. I just think this pandemic in their hands would be a catastrophe. This is pure speculation on my part. This post reads a bit muddles, I tried to address to may points in one sitting I feel. " I'm afraid your comment was both deflection and irrelevant. As is any mention of so called 'looney left'. The issues regarding the crisis are that there is a lack of PPE which is putting medical staff and their patients at risk. And that the government needs to be showing more leadership both in this, testing and in explaining the exist strategy. Using the current behavioral view that 70 to 80% of people are following the current 'rules" it should be understood that this will increasingly reduce if a) there is no firm end in sight and unfortunately also b) they have no one in their close knit relationships that have been affected. So very soon more and more people will flout | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK then. Can someone please explain to me WHY we have have a higher rate of death in the UK than anywhere else in Europe? I am still waiting for someone to answer this. What has caused our exceptionally high tragic loss of life? What is it? Something in the water? The Gulf Stream? Genetics? Please. I am asking for a reason." *Tumble* . . . *Dustdevil* Silence.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK then. Can someone please explain to me WHY we have have a higher rate of death in the UK than anywhere else in Europe? I am still waiting for someone to answer this. What has caused our exceptionally high tragic loss of life? What is it? Something in the water? The Gulf Stream? Genetics? Please. I am asking for a reason. *Tumble* . . . *Dustdevil* Silence...." Relatively low level of testing, only those going into hospital for the main part. The population density, small country + high population. And the density of the population, 500 mile round trip for fishing !!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK then. Can someone please explain to me WHY we have have a higher rate of death in the UK than anywhere else in Europe?" Evidence please, as far as I've seen we are at comparable death rates to some other countries, not a higher rate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. Makes sense to me. Doesn't make sense to me. Firstly "the whole world" isn't clamouring for PPE. Many countries have this virus under control. Something that isn't being spoken about for obvious reasons. Secondly we have a powerful currency. Why are we struggling to compete to buy PPE? Why does the excuse for this keep changing?" The WHO is reporting a worldwide shortage of PPE. The great majority of countries are still struggling. The ones with it under control are continuing to use PPE effectively to contain it. Interestingly how many countries do you think are doing a great job of containing it? I can think of only a handful | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. Makes sense to me. Doesn't make sense to me. Firstly "the whole world" isn't clamouring for PPE. Many countries have this virus under control. Something that isn't being spoken about for obvious reasons. Secondly we have a powerful currency. Why are we struggling to compete to buy PPE? Why does the excuse for this keep changing? The WHO is reporting a worldwide shortage of PPE. The great majority of countries are still struggling. The ones with it under control are continuing to use PPE effectively to contain it. Interestingly how many countries do you think are doing a great job of containing it? I can think of only a handful " Well starting with Greenland. 11 cases. 11 recoveries no deaths. China 108 new cases today 2 deaths S.Korea 3 deaths Germany 21 deaths Thailand 2 deaths India 27 deaths Let me make this easy for you. Apart from the USA with a population far higher than ours and Trump in charge we have the highest rate of new cases in the world. The same goes for deaths. The closest anyone comes to us is France with 4,188 new cases vs our 4,342 but have a death count of 574 vs our reported 717. There are many countries with double digit new cases and single digit fatalities. So again. Not "the whole world". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. Makes sense to me. Doesn't make sense to me. Firstly "the whole world" isn't clamouring for PPE. Many countries have this virus under control. Something that isn't being spoken about for obvious reasons. Secondly we have a powerful currency. Why are we struggling to compete to buy PPE? Why does the excuse for this keep changing? The WHO is reporting a worldwide shortage of PPE. The great majority of countries are still struggling. The ones with it under control are continuing to use PPE effectively to contain it. Interestingly how many countries do you think are doing a great job of containing it? I can think of only a handful Well starting with Greenland. 11 cases. 11 recoveries no deaths. China 108 new cases today 2 deaths S.Korea 3 deaths Germany 21 deaths Thailand 2 deaths India 27 deaths Let me make this easy for you. Apart from the USA with a population far higher than ours and Trump in charge we have the highest rate of new cases in the world. The same goes for deaths. The closest anyone comes to us is France with 4,188 new cases vs our 4,342 but have a death count of 574 vs our reported 717. There are many countries with double digit new cases and single digit fatalities. So again. Not "the whole world". " Fucking Greenland!!! hardly a fair comparison!!!! Watch India by the end of this. I can tell you now they are not accurate figures. And do you believe China’s figures? Germany and South Korea have been excellent in their response I would be the first to say that. And where did I say “whole”? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. " That’s just what my friend says as well. She can get a test but there’s just no point without symptoms when she’s going to be facing it the next day. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. Makes sense to me. Doesn't make sense to me. Firstly "the whole world" isn't clamouring for PPE. Many countries have this virus under control. Something that isn't being spoken about for obvious reasons. Secondly we have a powerful currency. Why are we struggling to compete to buy PPE? Why does the excuse for this keep changing? The WHO is reporting a worldwide shortage of PPE. The great majority of countries are still struggling. The ones with it under control are continuing to use PPE effectively to contain it. Interestingly how many countries do you think are doing a great job of containing it? I can think of only a handful Well starting with Greenland. 11 cases. 11 recoveries no deaths. China 108 new cases today 2 deaths S.Korea 3 deaths Germany 21 deaths Thailand 2 deaths India 27 deaths Let me make this easy for you. Apart from the USA with a population far higher than ours and Trump in charge we have the highest rate of new cases in the world. The same goes for deaths. The closest anyone comes to us is France with 4,188 new cases vs our 4,342 but have a death count of 574 vs our reported 717. There are many countries with double digit new cases and single digit fatalities. So again. Not "the whole world". Fucking Greenland!!! hardly a fair comparison!!!! Watch India by the end of this. I can tell you now they are not accurate figures. And do you believe China’s figures? Germany and South Korea have been excellent in their response I would be the first to say that. And where did I say “whole”? " You didn't my original response wasn't to you. Read up. "the world is clamouring for it at once" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. Makes sense to me. Doesn't make sense to me. Firstly "the whole world" isn't clamouring for PPE. Many countries have this virus under control. Something that isn't being spoken about for obvious reasons. Secondly we have a powerful currency. Why are we struggling to compete to buy PPE? Why does the excuse for this keep changing? The WHO is reporting a worldwide shortage of PPE. The great majority of countries are still struggling. The ones with it under control are continuing to use PPE effectively to contain it. Interestingly how many countries do you think are doing a great job of containing it? I can think of only a handful Well starting with Greenland. 11 cases. 11 recoveries no deaths. China 108 new cases today 2 deaths S.Korea 3 deaths Germany 21 deaths Thailand 2 deaths India 27 deaths Let me make this easy for you. Apart from the USA with a population far higher than ours and Trump in charge we have the highest rate of new cases in the world. The same goes for deaths. The closest anyone comes to us is France with 4,188 new cases vs our 4,342 but have a death count of 574 vs our reported 717. There are many countries with double digit new cases and single digit fatalities. So again. Not "the whole world". Fucking Greenland!!! hardly a fair comparison!!!! Watch India by the end of this. I can tell you now they are not accurate figures. And do you believe China’s figures? Germany and South Korea have been excellent in their response I would be the first to say that. And where did I say “whole”? You didn't my original response wasn't to you. Read up. "the world is clamouring for it at once"" But we can agree that most of the world is? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. Makes sense to me. Doesn't make sense to me. Firstly "the whole world" isn't clamouring for PPE. Many countries have this virus under control. Something that isn't being spoken about for obvious reasons. Secondly we have a powerful currency. Why are we struggling to compete to buy PPE? Why does the excuse for this keep changing? The WHO is reporting a worldwide shortage of PPE. The great majority of countries are still struggling. The ones with it under control are continuing to use PPE effectively to contain it. Interestingly how many countries do you think are doing a great job of containing it? I can think of only a handful Well starting with Greenland. 11 cases. 11 recoveries no deaths. China 108 new cases today 2 deaths S.Korea 3 deaths Germany 21 deaths Thailand 2 deaths India 27 deaths Let me make this easy for you. Apart from the USA with a population far higher than ours and Trump in charge we have the highest rate of new cases in the world. The same goes for deaths. The closest anyone comes to us is France with 4,188 new cases vs our 4,342 but have a death count of 574 vs our reported 717. There are many countries with double digit new cases and single digit fatalities. So again. Not "the whole world". Fucking Greenland!!! hardly a fair comparison!!!! Watch India by the end of this. I can tell you now they are not accurate figures. And do you believe China’s figures? Germany and South Korea have been excellent in their response I would be the first to say that. And where did I say “whole”? You didn't my original response wasn't to you. Read up. "the world is clamouring for it at once"" Oh and I wasn't asked for a fair comparison. What you should have got from my reply is that no one apart from the country being managed by trump has managed to do worse than us. No I don't believe China's figures. I don't believe ours either. I've posted at least two articles today that back that up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. Makes sense to me. Doesn't make sense to me. Firstly "the whole world" isn't clamouring for PPE. Many countries have this virus under control. Something that isn't being spoken about for obvious reasons. Secondly we have a powerful currency. Why are we struggling to compete to buy PPE? Why does the excuse for this keep changing? The WHO is reporting a worldwide shortage of PPE. The great majority of countries are still struggling. The ones with it under control are continuing to use PPE effectively to contain it. Interestingly how many countries do you think are doing a great job of containing it? I can think of only a handful Well starting with Greenland. 11 cases. 11 recoveries no deaths. China 108 new cases today 2 deaths S.Korea 3 deaths Germany 21 deaths Thailand 2 deaths India 27 deaths Let me make this easy for you. Apart from the USA with a population far higher than ours and Trump in charge we have the highest rate of new cases in the world. The same goes for deaths. The closest anyone comes to us is France with 4,188 new cases vs our 4,342 but have a death count of 574 vs our reported 717. There are many countries with double digit new cases and single digit fatalities. So again. Not "the whole world". Fucking Greenland!!! hardly a fair comparison!!!! Watch India by the end of this. I can tell you now they are not accurate figures. And do you believe China’s figures? Germany and South Korea have been excellent in their response I would be the first to say that. And where did I say “whole”? You didn't my original response wasn't to you. Read up. "the world is clamouring for it at once" But we can agree that most of the world is? " There are a lot of countries with far less buying power than us competing with us on the market. Yet we either can't procure any or we can't distribute it. Depends on the story of the day. Will you agree with me we wouldn't need so much PPE if we didn't have so many people in critical condition. Back to my question. Why do we have so many of those people vs other countries? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. That’s just what my friend says as well. She can get a test but there’s just no point without symptoms when she’s going to be facing it the next day. " Is there a window period between becoming infected and becoming infectious? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it,s been reported that Michael Goves daughter as been tested for covid 19 So, what's the problem? She's just as entitled to be tested as anyone else. You realise a lot of NHS staff have still not been tested? So? Does that make her exempt from being tested? She was tested for good reason, check your facts! Last time I checked people who were saving our lives had not been checked A friend of mine who's a Paramedic explained this to me as I was flabbergasted by it, but her explanation made perfect sense. Firstly they ate testing any NHS workers who are showing symptoms so they can stand them down if necessary, then once they're good they'll know they've had it and can get them back in the fight quicker. The other thing was to say that there's no point testing them if they've shown no symptoms as even if they're found to be clear they could still get it the very next day, so pointless, plus the tests at present don't show antibodies in those who have already had it, plus there aren't enough to just test everyone at present. Any NHS worker can book themselves a test if they display any symptoms though. If that explanation was good enough for her it's good enough for me, although I'd agree they should be getting all the reasonable protections they can and its just not available as every healthcare service in the world is clamouring for it at once. Thank god its now starting to be better stuff and more of it,but sooner would have been better. Makes sense to me. Doesn't make sense to me. Firstly "the whole world" isn't clamouring for PPE. Many countries have this virus under control. Something that isn't being spoken about for obvious reasons. Secondly we have a powerful currency. Why are we struggling to compete to buy PPE? Why does the excuse for this keep changing? The WHO is reporting a worldwide shortage of PPE. The great majority of countries are still struggling. The ones with it under control are continuing to use PPE effectively to contain it. Interestingly how many countries do you think are doing a great job of containing it? I can think of only a handful Well starting with Greenland. 11 cases. 11 recoveries no deaths. China 108 new cases today 2 deaths S.Korea 3 deaths Germany 21 deaths Thailand 2 deaths India 27 deaths Let me make this easy for you. Apart from the USA with a population far higher than ours and Trump in charge we have the highest rate of new cases in the world. The same goes for deaths. The closest anyone comes to us is France with 4,188 new cases vs our 4,342 but have a death count of 574 vs our reported 717. There are many countries with double digit new cases and single digit fatalities. So again. Not "the whole world". Fucking Greenland!!! hardly a fair comparison!!!! Watch India by the end of this. I can tell you now they are not accurate figures. And do you believe China’s figures? Germany and South Korea have been excellent in their response I would be the first to say that. And where did I say “whole”? You didn't my original response wasn't to you. Read up. "the world is clamouring for it at once" But we can agree that most of the world is? There are a lot of countries with far less buying power than us competing with us on the market. Yet we either can't procure any or we can't distribute it. Depends on the story of the day. Will you agree with me we wouldn't need so much PPE if we didn't have so many people in critical condition. Back to my question. Why do we have so many of those people vs other countries?" I believe lockdown was too late. Transport in London and the crowding issues. We let people saunter in and out the country without even a temp check. We have kept the air space open. Even now I can catch a flight home four times a week. Didn’t test and contain. But I’m only a layman. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |