FabSwingers.com > Forums > USA > Most americans have cut cocks
Most americans have cut cocks
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"It's generally considered to be a cleaner look. Obviously everyone has their own preferences, but it's definitely more common and popular in America."  | |||
| |||
"Who cares?" The person who asked the question. | |||
| |||
| |||
"80% of Americans are circumcised according to care.com and wiki" Yep and not sure what % it is in the Uk. | |||
| |||
| |||
I know some people have a preference but i have to say that it has never impacted in any of the fun i have had there, which tends to be group stuff, even though i myself am uncut. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Yep. They like to mutilate babies over there." No we just don't like our cocks to look like elephant trunks  | |||
| |||
"Yep. They like to mutilate babies over there. No we just don't like our cocks to look like elephant trunks "Not sure If you're aware but babies don't have the cognitive ability to make a penis trunk based desicion resulting in genital mutilation. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Yeah, a lot of Brits are surprised to hear about this and some Americans are surprised that the Brits don't really do it." I was one that was surprised when I started swinging here in the UK and seeing that all the guys were not cut. It doesn't matter cut or not cut. Its the guy that the cock is attached to is what counts..lol | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Is that true?" . I'm snipped | |||
| |||
 | |||
| |||
| |||
"80% of Americans are circumcised according to care.com and wiki" Wiki is the last source of information that someone can possibly rely on. It's not true at all. Most Americans aren't cut just like most Europeans. Jew's and muslims are cut. These groups aren't the majority in America and Europe. Wikipedia? Absolute BS  | |||
"A cut cock having less "chance of infection or STD" is a myth, and has been shown by medical research to be totally unproven. It was promoted by doctords in the 19th century. Still believed by many. " | |||
"As an uncut UK guy I can not understand in this day and age why you would say it is more hygienic to be cut. I shower every day and am always nice and clean down there. I agree that if it were personal choice each to his own but it sounds like most men don't get the choice - having it done to them when they are too young to decide." Spot on!
There are only 2 reasons for circumcision : religion and medical necessity.
Well, you can throw in the rare personal choice to be "fashionable". | |||
| |||
| |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. " Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. | |||
| |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason." You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import.... | |||
"the guys my wife had fun with in Vegas were uncut and all from USA" That's because those guys are like over 80% of the Americans - uncut. | |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import.... "You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin. | |||
| |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import....
You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin. "My apologies! You didn't say "from". I'd better stop engaging in forums half asleep in the wee hours of the morning and from a small phone... But presumably that's what all who claim that most Americans are cut, did too. They must have confused it with Africa. As far as the origin of life is concerned... Well, no one knows. A number of theories but that's what they all are - just theories and beliefs. No conclusive evidence. But I certainly don't accept the theory of Evolution. | |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import....
You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin.
My apologies! You didn't say "from". I'd better stop engaging in forums half asleep in the wee hours of the morning and from a small phone...
But presumably that's what all who claim that most Americans are cut, did too. They must have confused it with Africa.
As far as the origin of life is concerned... Well, no one knows. A number of theories but that's what they all are - just theories and beliefs. No conclusive evidence. But I certainly don't accept the theory of Evolution."Apology accepted. Others have already given proof that the majority of Americans are indeed circumcised. So far all the evidence we have shows that humans did evolve from Africa around 200,000 years ago. Can you prove that this isnt the case and show older human remains in other parts of the world? | |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import....
You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin.
My apologies! You didn't say "from". I'd better stop engaging in forums half asleep in the wee hours of the morning and from a small phone...
But presumably that's what all who claim that most Americans are cut, did too. They must have confused it with Africa.
As far as the origin of life is concerned... Well, no one knows. A number of theories but that's what they all are - just theories and beliefs. No conclusive evidence. But I certainly don't accept the theory of Evolution.
Apology accepted.
Others have already given proof that the majority of Americans are indeed circumcised.
So far all the evidence we have shows that humans did evolve from Africa around 200,000 years ago. Can you prove that this isnt the case and show older human remains in other parts of the world? "The "evidence" of others is as good as the old wives' tales. The facts are quite the opposite, so about 20% of the Yankees are circumcised. Regarding you other question, I'm concerned that we'll be hijacking the thread. Yet very briefly, no evidence that humans evolved. More evidence that humans were created and that the first people inhabited what is today the Middle East. We can start another thread on this though. Send me a link if you do so. Have a great day! | |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import....
You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin.
My apologies! You didn't say "from". I'd better stop engaging in forums half asleep in the wee hours of the morning and from a small phone...
But presumably that's what all who claim that most Americans are cut, did too. They must have confused it with Africa.
As far as the origin of life is concerned... Well, no one knows. A number of theories but that's what they all are - just theories and beliefs. No conclusive evidence. But I certainly don't accept the theory of Evolution.
Apology accepted.
Others have already given proof that the majority of Americans are indeed circumcised.
So far all the evidence we have shows that humans did evolve from Africa around 200,000 years ago. Can you prove that this isnt the case and show older human remains in other parts of the world?
The "evidence" of others is as good as the old wives' tales. The facts are quite the opposite, so about 20% of the Yankees are circumcised.
Regarding you other question, I'm concerned that we'll be hijacking the thread. Yet very briefly, no evidence that humans evolved. More evidence that humans were created and that the first people inhabited what is today the Middle East. We can start another thread on this though. Send me a link if you do so.
Have a great day! "Whether or not you believe in evolution or not, the oldest human remains have been found in Africa, not the middle east. If you just dismiss academic research out of hand, I'm going to assume that you haven't spent much time conducting or studying such research. | |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import....
You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin.
My apologies! You didn't say "from". I'd better stop engaging in forums half asleep in the wee hours of the morning and from a small phone...
But presumably that's what all who claim that most Americans are cut, did too. They must have confused it with Africa.
As far as the origin of life is concerned... Well, no one knows. A number of theories but that's what they all are - just theories and beliefs. No conclusive evidence. But I certainly don't accept the theory of Evolution.
Apology accepted.
Others have already given proof that the majority of Americans are indeed circumcised.
So far all the evidence we have shows that humans did evolve from Africa around 200,000 years ago. Can you prove that this isnt the case and show older human remains in other parts of the world?
The "evidence" of others is as good as the old wives' tales. The facts are quite the opposite, so about 20% of the Yankees are circumcised.
Regarding you other question, I'm concerned that we'll be hijacking the thread. Yet very briefly, no evidence that humans evolved. More evidence that humans were created and that the first people inhabited what is today the Middle East. We can start another thread on this though. Send me a link if you do so.
Have a great day!
Whether or not you believe in evolution or not, the oldest human remains have been found in Africa, not the middle east.
If you just dismiss academic research out of hand, I'm going to assume that you haven't spent much time conducting or studying such research. "Your assumption is correct. I'm not a researcher as I have more important things to do with my life. There is a tiny minority in any given profession who are the true professionals and who have dedicated their lives to a certain cause. The rest of the society merely learn from what they tell us, rightly or wrongly. Every intelligent person will tell you that science isn't a finite subject. It develops. The more a true scientist know the more they realise how little do they know. It's only the narrow minded pseudo scientists who claim that that's it, this is all there is and nothing further can be known because it doesn't exist. Mind you, evolutionists who claim with absolute certainty that their theory is right and nothing further can be discovered, fall into that category. Oldest man in Africa? Perhaps by 2017 it may be true. Not that it is, because if you were to do just a quick research, you'll discover a whole new world out there. But in a year or 10 a new discovery may show how wrong the conclusion of today are, etc. The Examples from history are plenty. There's evidence that the first humans were living in today's Iraq / Iran and then spread out through Turkey to other parts of the world.
Believe what you will. | |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import....
You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin.
My apologies! You didn't say "from". I'd better stop engaging in forums half asleep in the wee hours of the morning and from a small phone...
But presumably that's what all who claim that most Americans are cut, did too. They must have confused it with Africa.
As far as the origin of life is concerned... Well, no one knows. A number of theories but that's what they all are - just theories and beliefs. No conclusive evidence. But I certainly don't accept the theory of Evolution.
Apology accepted.
Others have already given proof that the majority of Americans are indeed circumcised.
So far all the evidence we have shows that humans did evolve from Africa around 200,000 years ago. Can you prove that this isnt the case and show older human remains in other parts of the world?
The "evidence" of others is as good as the old wives' tales. The facts are quite the opposite, so about 20% of the Yankees are circumcised.
Regarding you other question, I'm concerned that we'll be hijacking the thread. Yet very briefly, no evidence that humans evolved. More evidence that humans were created and that the first people inhabited what is today the Middle East. We can start another thread on this though. Send me a link if you do so.
Have a great day!
Whether or not you believe in evolution or not, the oldest human remains have been found in Africa, not the middle east.
If you just dismiss academic research out of hand, I'm going to assume that you haven't spent much time conducting or studying such research.
Your assumption is correct. I'm not a researcher as I have more important things to do with my life. There is a tiny minority in any given profession who are the true professionals and who have dedicated their lives to a certain cause. The rest of the society merely learn from what they tell us, rightly or wrongly.
Every intelligent person will tell you that science isn't a finite subject. It develops. The more a true scientist know the more they realise how little do they know. It's only the narrow minded pseudo scientists who claim that that's it, this is all there is and nothing further can be known because it doesn't exist.
Mind you, evolutionists who claim with absolute certainty that their theory is right and nothing further can be discovered, fall into that category.
Oldest man in Africa? Perhaps by 2017 it may be true. Not that it is, because if you were to do just a quick research, you'll discover a whole new world out there. But in a year or 10 a new discovery may show how wrong the conclusion of today are, etc. The Examples from history are plenty.
There's evidence that the first humans were living in today's Iraq / Iran and then spread out through Turkey to other parts of the world.
Believe what you will. "Right, well getting back to the OP, Iraq, Iran and Turkey are all hot countries, and humans have foreskins. So the theory about it being too hot to have one doesn't hold much water. | |||
| |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import....
You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin.
My apologies! You didn't say "from". I'd better stop engaging in forums half asleep in the wee hours of the morning and from a small phone...
But presumably that's what all who claim that most Americans are cut, did too. They must have confused it with Africa.
As far as the origin of life is concerned... Well, no one knows. A number of theories but that's what they all are - just theories and beliefs. No conclusive evidence. But I certainly don't accept the theory of Evolution.
Apology accepted.
Others have already given proof that the majority of Americans are indeed circumcised.
So far all the evidence we have shows that humans did evolve from Africa around 200,000 years ago. Can you prove that this isnt the case and show older human remains in other parts of the world?
The "evidence" of others is as good as the old wives' tales. The facts are quite the opposite, so about 20% of the Yankees are circumcised.
Regarding you other question, I'm concerned that we'll be hijacking the thread. Yet very briefly, no evidence that humans evolved. More evidence that humans were created and that the first people inhabited what is today the Middle East. We can start another thread on this though. Send me a link if you do so.
Have a great day!
Whether or not you believe in evolution or not, the oldest human remains have been found in Africa, not the middle east.
If you just dismiss academic research out of hand, I'm going to assume that you haven't spent much time conducting or studying such research.
Your assumption is correct. I'm not a researcher as I have more important things to do with my life. There is a tiny minority in any given profession who are the true professionals and who have dedicated their lives to a certain cause. The rest of the society merely learn from what they tell us, rightly or wrongly.
Every intelligent person will tell you that science isn't a finite subject. It develops. The more a true scientist know the more they realise how little do they know. It's only the narrow minded pseudo scientists who claim that that's it, this is all there is and nothing further can be known because it doesn't exist.
Mind you, evolutionists who claim with absolute certainty that their theory is right and nothing further can be discovered, fall into that category.
Oldest man in Africa? Perhaps by 2017 it may be true. Not that it is, because if you were to do just a quick research, you'll discover a whole new world out there. But in a year or 10 a new discovery may show how wrong the conclusion of today are, etc. The Examples from history are plenty.
There's evidence that the first humans were living in today's Iraq / Iran and then spread out through Turkey to other parts of the world.
Believe what you will.
Right, well getting back to the OP, Iraq, Iran and Turkey are all hot countries, and humans have foreskins. So the theory about it being too hot to have one doesn't hold much water."If heat and hygiene were the reasons for circumcision, body hair all over, would be the first to go. But it isn't. It's all about religion. I don't know who came up with this tosh that Christian protestant Americans go to churches with cut dicks   | |||
| |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import....
You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin.
My apologies! You didn't say "from". I'd better stop engaging in forums half asleep in the wee hours of the morning and from a small phone...
But presumably that's what all who claim that most Americans are cut, did too. They must have confused it with Africa.
As far as the origin of life is concerned... Well, no one knows. A number of theories but that's what they all are - just theories and beliefs. No conclusive evidence. But I certainly don't accept the theory of Evolution.
Apology accepted.
Others have already given proof that the majority of Americans are indeed circumcised.
So far all the evidence we have shows that humans did evolve from Africa around 200,000 years ago. Can you prove that this isnt the case and show older human remains in other parts of the world?
The "evidence" of others is as good as the old wives' tales. The facts are quite the opposite, so about 20% of the Yankees are circumcised.
Regarding you other question, I'm concerned that we'll be hijacking the thread. Yet very briefly, no evidence that humans evolved. More evidence that humans were created and that the first people inhabited what is today the Middle East. We can start another thread on this though. Send me a link if you do so.
Have a great day!
Whether or not you believe in evolution or not, the oldest human remains have been found in Africa, not the middle east.
If you just dismiss academic research out of hand, I'm going to assume that you haven't spent much time conducting or studying such research.
Your assumption is correct. I'm not a researcher as I have more important things to do with my life. There is a tiny minority in any given profession who are the true professionals and who have dedicated their lives to a certain cause. The rest of the society merely learn from what they tell us, rightly or wrongly.
Every intelligent person will tell you that science isn't a finite subject. It develops. The more a true scientist know the more they realise how little do they know. It's only the narrow minded pseudo scientists who claim that that's it, this is all there is and nothing further can be known because it doesn't exist.
Mind you, evolutionists who claim with absolute certainty that their theory is right and nothing further can be discovered, fall into that category.
Oldest man in Africa? Perhaps by 2017 it may be true. Not that it is, because if you were to do just a quick research, you'll discover a whole new world out there. But in a year or 10 a new discovery may show how wrong the conclusion of today are, etc. The Examples from history are plenty.
There's evidence that the first humans were living in today's Iraq / Iran and then spread out through Turkey to other parts of the world.
Believe what you will.
Right, well getting back to the OP, Iraq, Iran and Turkey are all hot countries, and humans have foreskins. So the theory about it being too hot to have one doesn't hold much water.
If heat and hygiene were the reasons for circumcision, body hair all over, would be the first to go. But it isn't. It's all about religion. I don't know who came up with this tosh that Christian protestant Americans go to churches with cut dicks
"CLCC, are you following the news? It was reported today that archeologists discovered evidence in Australia that people inhabited the land tens of thousands of years earlier than the oldest remains found in Africa. Let them keep digging. One day they'll discover the truth. It's the Middle East where everything begun... Remember what I told you a week ago about science etc? | |||
| |||
"I am cut as born in africa and pretty standard out there. As I understand it is not for sensitivity or too reduce std, its more about hygeine on the extreme heat. Bollocks, Africa is the cradle of life, it's where all human's evolved from. We evolved with a foreskin in that environment for a reason. You evolved from a foreskin? In Africa? Which one is this theory? It's not about Creation, Evolution, The Big Bang, Alien import....
You need to work on your comprehension. Humans evolved IN Africa, and evolved WITH a foreskin. No where did I say that humans evolved FROM a foreskin. "You're probably correct though, even if you didnt intend to say that. Theres a lot of folks in fab who are living proof of it! | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say "Couple of questions for you... The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design? Boobs. Evolution or design? Foreskin. Evolution or design? Where did humans evolve from? | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?"The answer is that there was never evolutionary process. We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school. It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ. It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle. I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed? | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed? "So it is all design? We were designed to have farmable spare parts? Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand. | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand."I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach. It has it's function but it isn't a stomach. As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer... Wish you well! | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand.
I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach.
It has it's function but it isn't a stomach.
As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer...
Wish you well! "I was suggesting that evolution rendered a second stomach redundant, but the appendix was a remnant of that. The rich diversity of life on this planet is nothing more than a very lucky coincidence. However, to go back to my original point, the foreskin is there for a reason. | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand.
I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach.
It has it's function but it isn't a stomach.
As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer...
Wish you well!
I was suggesting that evolution rendered a second stomach redundant, but the appendix was a remnant of that.
The rich diversity of life on this planet is nothing more than a very lucky coincidence.
However, to go back to my original point, the foreskin is there for a reason."It must have been an extremely lucky coincidence , so extreme and so lucky that is impossible to believe. But I agree, the foreskin is for a reason and I'd rather keep it that way. | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand.
I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach.
It has it's function but it isn't a stomach.
As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer...
Wish you well!
I was suggesting that evolution rendered a second stomach redundant, but the appendix was a remnant of that.
The rich diversity of life on this planet is nothing more than a very lucky coincidence.
However, to go back to my original point, the foreskin is there for a reason.
It must have been an extremely lucky coincidence , so extreme and so lucky that is impossible to believe.
But I agree, the foreskin is for a reason and I'd rather keep it that way.
"Impossible to believe it isn't a coincidence? Care to elaborate? | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand.
I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach.
It has it's function but it isn't a stomach.
As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer...
Wish you well!
I was suggesting that evolution rendered a second stomach redundant, but the appendix was a remnant of that.
The rich diversity of life on this planet is nothing more than a very lucky coincidence.
However, to go back to my original point, the foreskin is there for a reason.
It must have been an extremely lucky coincidence , so extreme and so lucky that is impossible to believe.
But I agree, the foreskin is for a reason and I'd rather keep it that way.
Impossible to believe it isn't a coincidence? Care to elaborate?"You know the usual arguments between evolutionists and creationists - which theory requires more blind faith? Well, you said it - life on the Earth is the result of a very lucky coincidence. Out of absolutely nothing, matter came about. Then it formed by itself in almost perfect order and became living organisms... Would you believe me if I told you that my Rolex came out of nothing, formed some tiny particles, in wheels and bolts and gears and started to tell the time? All by itself? I believe what is easier and more logical - someone who knows his stuff, made it! | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand.
I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach.
It has it's function but it isn't a stomach.
As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer...
Wish you well!
I was suggesting that evolution rendered a second stomach redundant, but the appendix was a remnant of that.
The rich diversity of life on this planet is nothing more than a very lucky coincidence.
However, to go back to my original point, the foreskin is there for a reason.
It must have been an extremely lucky coincidence , so extreme and so lucky that is impossible to believe.
But I agree, the foreskin is for a reason and I'd rather keep it that way.
Impossible to believe it isn't a coincidence? Care to elaborate?
You know the usual arguments between evolutionists and creationists - which theory requires more blind faith?
Well, you said it - life on the Earth is the result of a very lucky coincidence. Out of absolutely nothing, matter came about. Then it formed by itself in almost perfect order and became living organisms...
Would you believe me if I told you that my Rolex came out of nothing, formed some tiny particles, in wheels and bolts and gears and started to tell the time? All by itself?
I believe what is easier and more logical - someone who knows his stuff, made it! "I know where this is going so I'm going to bow out. However, who created the creator? | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand.
I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach.
It has it's function but it isn't a stomach.
As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer...
Wish you well!
I was suggesting that evolution rendered a second stomach redundant, but the appendix was a remnant of that.
The rich diversity of life on this planet is nothing more than a very lucky coincidence.
However, to go back to my original point, the foreskin is there for a reason.
It must have been an extremely lucky coincidence , so extreme and so lucky that is impossible to believe.
But I agree, the foreskin is for a reason and I'd rather keep it that way.
Impossible to believe it isn't a coincidence? Care to elaborate?
You know the usual arguments between evolutionists and creationists - which theory requires more blind faith?
Well, you said it - life on the Earth is the result of a very lucky coincidence. Out of absolutely nothing, matter came about. Then it formed by itself in almost perfect order and became living organisms...
Would you believe me if I told you that my Rolex came out of nothing, formed some tiny particles, in wheels and bolts and gears and started to tell the time? All by itself?
I believe what is easier and more logical - someone who knows his stuff, made it!
I know where this is going so I'm going to bow out. However, who created the creator?"Noone. That's why He is the ultimate Creator. Without a beginning and end. Life originates with Him. This isn't something that I can prove or understand. But at least it makes it more understandable from that point onwards. While evolution faces hurdles at every step and every corner. Look, as a Christian I have no animosity towards evolutionists. It is all about choices what to believe. No one can prove the other wrong. Thank you for your involvement in the discussion . We digressed again, but OP has abandoned the thread anyway... | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand.
I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach.
It has it's function but it isn't a stomach.
As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer...
Wish you well!
I was suggesting that evolution rendered a second stomach redundant, but the appendix was a remnant of that.
The rich diversity of life on this planet is nothing more than a very lucky coincidence.
However, to go back to my original point, the foreskin is there for a reason.
It must have been an extremely lucky coincidence , so extreme and so lucky that is impossible to believe.
But I agree, the foreskin is for a reason and I'd rather keep it that way.
Impossible to believe it isn't a coincidence? Care to elaborate?
You know the usual arguments between evolutionists and creationists - which theory requires more blind faith?
Well, you said it - life on the Earth is the result of a very lucky coincidence. Out of absolutely nothing, matter came about. Then it formed by itself in almost perfect order and became living organisms...
Would you believe me if I told you that my Rolex came out of nothing, formed some tiny particles, in wheels and bolts and gears and started to tell the time? All by itself?
I believe what is easier and more logical - someone who knows his stuff, made it!
I know where this is going so I'm going to bow out. However, who created the creator?
Noone. That's why He is the ultimate Creator. Without a beginning and end. Life originates with Him.
This isn't something that I can prove or understand. But at least it makes it more understandable from that point onwards. While evolution faces hurdles at every step and every corner.
Look, as a Christian I have no animosity towards evolutionists. It is all about choices what to believe. No one can prove the other wrong.
Thank you for your involvement in the discussion . We digressed again, but OP has abandoned the thread anyway... "How do you know the creator didn't create evolution? | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand.
I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach.
It has it's function but it isn't a stomach.
As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer...
Wish you well!
I was suggesting that evolution rendered a second stomach redundant, but the appendix was a remnant of that.
The rich diversity of life on this planet is nothing more than a very lucky coincidence.
However, to go back to my original point, the foreskin is there for a reason.
It must have been an extremely lucky coincidence , so extreme and so lucky that is impossible to believe.
But I agree, the foreskin is for a reason and I'd rather keep it that way.
Impossible to believe it isn't a coincidence? Care to elaborate?
You know the usual arguments between evolutionists and creationists - which theory requires more blind faith?
Well, you said it - life on the Earth is the result of a very lucky coincidence. Out of absolutely nothing, matter came about. Then it formed by itself in almost perfect order and became living organisms...
Would you believe me if I told you that my Rolex came out of nothing, formed some tiny particles, in wheels and bolts and gears and started to tell the time? All by itself?
I believe what is easier and more logical - someone who knows his stuff, made it!
I know where this is going so I'm going to bow out. However, who created the creator?
Noone. That's why He is the ultimate Creator. Without a beginning and end. Life originates with Him.
This isn't something that I can prove or understand. But at least it makes it more understandable from that point onwards. While evolution faces hurdles at every step and every corner.
Look, as a Christian I have no animosity towards evolutionists. It is all about choices what to believe. No one can prove the other wrong.
Thank you for your involvement in the discussion . We digressed again, but OP has abandoned the thread anyway...
How do you know the creator didn't create evolution? "I know about the Creator from the Bible. It says clearly how the world was created. It wasn't by the process of evolution. Yet again, accepting that Bible is an accurate account is a matter of personal belief. If you don't, then the whole thing about God and creation as opposed to self evolving life, goes out of the window. | |||
| |||
"Apparently is done to baby boys shortly after birth Is that right American forumites? What purpose it serves besides another item on the bill I am not sure..." yes, most are cut just after birth (patents choice but most choose to) the reason is for cleanliness and less chance of infection due to the fact that moisture can not collect there. because, as i am sure you know, not everyone cleans themselves like they should all the time. | |||
| |||
| |||
"I prefer cut men. I'll tell you privately." Always nice hear when a lady likes them circumcised and does seem to be more and more in the UK these days. | |||
| |||
| |||
"Do you really think it's like FGM?" It can be if done at birth without consent. Obviously if it is done for medical reasons, or when the man is over 18 and is consenting to the procedure it's different. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"positive part of circumsised is clean and generally less bugs! negative is less sensitive or positive as I last alot alot and alot longer" Less bugs?? Jesus, what the fuck do you have growing on yours?? | |||
| |||
"There was an article that said if more men in africa were circumcised the aids rate would be less. " Was that nonsense in the Beano or the Dandy? | |||
| |||
"Apparently is done to baby boys shortly after birth Is that right American forumites? What purpose it serves besides another item on the bill I am not sure..." A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men. Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners. Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin). Hope that helps. | |||
"Or what about the reports in May this year, claiming Europe as the birth place? 200 000 years earlier than the remains in Africa. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/ In fact all of these theories are wrong. Humans didn't evolve from apes. It's utter BS to even suggest it. Go and trust what scientists say
Couple of questions for you...
The human appendix is believed to exist from when we had an aditional stomach. As our diet changed, the stomach became redundant. So is the appendix an evolutionary remnant or there by design?
Boobs. Evolution or design?
Foreskin. Evolution or design?
Where did humans evolve from?
The answer is that there was never evolutionary process.
We were designed that way. Nothing is rudimentary, even the appendix. This outdated claim that the appendix wasn't needed. Told by evolutionist when I was at school.
It has long been established that the appendix contains bacteria that aid in the digestion of food. It also helps the immune system like a lymphatic organ.
It can also be used as a transplant for a bladder or even in rebuilding a sphincter muscle.
I suppose you didn't mean to say that the stomach isn't needed?
So it is all design?
We were designed to have farmable spare parts?
Sorry for not clarifying that I was referring to a second stomach being redundant. Clearly you'll pick out the bits you want to understand.
I thought your intention was a well mannered and meant conversation. I'm not picking up anything. Simply clarifying that I understood you correctly. No one ever suggested that humans need a second stomach and I wouldn't call the 11cm max of appendix to be a second stomach.
It has it's function but it isn't a stomach.
As to spare parts? - modern medicine discovered it. It doesn't matter what the human Instruction Manual says parts should be used for. Dunno, ask the Designer...
Wish you well!
I was suggesting that evolution rendered a second stomach redundant, but the appendix was a remnant of that.
The rich diversity of life on this planet is nothing more than a very lucky coincidence.
However, to go back to my original point, the foreskin is there for a reason.
It must have been an extremely lucky coincidence , so extreme and so lucky that is impossible to believe.
But I agree, the foreskin is for a reason and I'd rather keep it that way.
"why do we have eyebrows? | |||
"Up until recently; curcumcision was approximately 80% in the US. The rate is starting to fall slightly, though the US CDC continues to endorse this mutilation on an unfounded ( and wrong) belief that it somehow aids health and hygiene. In opposition to the rest of the world where it is recognised as a totally futile procedure. The exception being those places where it is done for religious reasons. There are numerous reasons behind the US fanaticism for mutilating their children; It can be traced back to snake oil " doctors" in the 18th and 19th century, who came up with all sorts of bollocks about how it prevented mental illness. It was also seen as an indicator of higher social status. Later, in the 1920s, it was believed by many that it was more hygienic. The latest utter dangerous nonsense is that it helps prevent the transmission of aids ( the reality is that , if anything, the opposite is true), and also that it lessens transmission of other STDs. Also not true. The circumcision rate in the US is still around 70%, depending on the state Globally circumcision is about 30% ( which includes Muslims, Jews, and other religions that require it) " A reduced risk of some sexually transmitted diseases in men. Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners. Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin). | |||
"A cut cock having less "chance of infection or STD" is a myth, and has been shown by medical research to be totally unproven. It was promoted by doctords in the 19th century. Still believed by many. " Additionally, a recent study of Senel et al.37 that examined the long-term effects of circumcision on sexual function concluded that circumcision did not adversely affect sexual functions, but it caused a significant improvement in erectile function and overall sexual satisfaction.. | |||
| |||
| |||
"Which ones taste better?" sucket and see! | |||
"Which ones taste better?sucket and see! ". Great pictures | |||
"Which ones taste better?sucket and see! " | |||
"Which ones taste better?" CUT. of course. | |||
"Is that true?" it sure is true. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Hate cut cocks. I don't meet guys that have had it done. I just don't like how they look. It's not natural. If they were meant to be cut then guys would be born that way. Unless it's for a medical reason, leave them be. " mmm you must love the tangy taste! | |||
| |||
"Is that true?" yep it's because jews dominate and control America and there very powerful in getting what they want.no matter how discusting and aborant and unfair it might seem to the rest of the world.!  | |||
"Is that true?yep it's because jews dominate and control America and there very powerful in getting what they want.no matter how discusting and aborant and unfair it might seem to the rest of the world.! "That is an extremely racist statement. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
