FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > UK > Russell Brand

Russell Brand

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *chochamber OP   Woman  over a year ago

Munster

Can't say I m surprised by the allegations, he was the perv hiding in plain sight. A younger, next generation version of Jimmy Saville. Expectation of more and more allegations and other celebrities to be embroiled in this circle of mysogyny.

At least the unpicking of the 90's/00's lad culture might encourage more respect for boundaries and caution about power dynamics.

Any of these clown-men, with over exaggerated personalities, just seem like sleaze bags now, and the wild body movements and boundary breaking antics are just a mask to hide their abusive, entitled tendencies.

All the enablers protecting and promoting them, boil my blood.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

*applause*

This is it exactly.

He established a horrible idea of what a "lothario" was supposed to be. He was completely openly breaching consent. This has the potential to make a real dent in a horrible toxic culture. No more "boys will be boys"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eamworkboyMan  over a year ago

Irvine

It's actually very hard to disagree with one word of your post

He's an absolute creep of an individual. Always has been, hopefully he'll get what's coming to him, I expect more allegations soon.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *idnight RamblerMan  over a year ago

Pershore

He's a creep in my book, and there's definitely something of the night about him. That said, I'm not keen on the 'trail by TV' trend, but when you read all the support for Brand it's small wonder victims don't come forward to the Police.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *londebiguyMan  over a year ago

Southport

I'd say it's upto the actual hard evidence, the police and courts to decide.

We can all just speculate while the press throw about their accusations and slurs as usual.

I'd rather hear the actual facts.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I have never liked the man, loud and egotistical. However you do have to remember he went full scale against the covid scamdemic, and it wouldn't surprise me if this is somehow connected. Drum roll conspiracy theory

Accusations are one thing and I hope if she has made allegations she has done genuinely.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icki555Man  over a year ago

Newbridge

My thoughts: -

1 - maybe unsurprising, as others have said.

2 - similar to other views, my first thought was ‘let’s wait to see what the case against him looks like’, we all know some individuals will see an opportunity to make money, where celebrity is involved.

But…currently at least 3 individuals have come forward with claims. There were apparently text messages sent and received, and witnesses who allegedly stood by and did nothing (and many years later apologised to the victim). If these pieces of evidence are still recoverable and witnesses are made to provide testimony, then he’ll be doing bird quicker you can say ‘alright, guv’nor, it’s a fair cop’… and that’s just given what we know and assuming no others will come forward with similar claims.

So - while a certain number of acolytes to the church of brand will continue to say that he’s being persecuted by the media, given what we know so far I think this particular false idol is about to come crashing down.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouchofgrayMan  over a year ago

Dumfries

I have never been a fan of RB. I detest some of his past antics, he may well be guilty of these accusations and more.

However, I believe this is a move to silence him. He is obviously obviously right on target with his anti globalists remarks.

While he is most likely a misogynistic twat... an attack on free speech cannot be acceptable.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icki555Man  over a year ago

Newbridge


"I have never been a fan of RB. I detest some of his past antics, he may well be guilty of these accusations and more.

However, I believe this is a move to silence him. He is obviously obviously right on target with his anti globalists remarks.

While he is most likely a misogynistic twat... an attack on free speech cannot be acceptable. "

Not sure I agree that this is a move to silence him, but ok - let’s assume that perhaps someone could be behind the scenes trying to get these people to come forward and tarnish his reputation. Yes, perhaps that might work.

But - it takes a lot of guts for these women to step up and say that a well known celebrity has sexually assaulted or r*ped them. They risk their own reputation, expect to be hounded by press, and have themselves placed in the spotlight for scrutiny by social media.

So for me, given the strength of the claims, it’s less an orchestrated attack, and more likely that he’s a bad egg and has finally gotten what he deserves. But in any case I guess we’ll see.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *chupforitMan  over a year ago

Peterborough

Just another TV presenter taking advantage. There has been plenty. I personally don't give it the time. Couple of weeks there will be another one. Don't give it tv time. Just tell us how long the sentence is.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

My next door neighbours dog looks guilty by association..it's a Jack Russell brand

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *mazonwahayMan  over a year ago

Torquay

As usual, people saying let the courts decide.

Under 1% of reported (insert R word here) lead to prosecution. So actually, let's not let the courts decide.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"As usual, people saying let the courts decide.

Under 1% of reported (insert R word here) lead to prosecution. So actually, let's not let the courts decide. "

People can say that if they wish, but I agree with you and not only that, I believe the women on the dispatches programme.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ob198XaMan  over a year ago

teleford


"I'd say it's upto the actual hard evidence, the police and courts to decide.

We can all just speculate while the press throw about their accusations and slurs as usual.

I'd rather hear the actual facts."

He’s a history of throwing about speculation accusations and slurs without any evidence.. so poetic justice

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *regoniansCouple  over a year ago

Oundle


"I have never been a fan of RB. I detest some of his past antics, he may well be guilty of these accusations and more.

However, I believe this is a move to silence him. He is obviously obviously right on target with his anti globalists remarks.

While he is most likely a misogynistic twat... an attack on free speech cannot be acceptable. "

Likely? A colleague of mine was flying to LA on Virgin to finalise her wedding plans with a guy she'd met from the company we all worked for. Who should be sitting behind her in upper class but Russell Brand. He outright asked her if she wanted to join him as a member of the mile high club. This was at the time when Brand was living with Katy Perry. My colleague politely declined explaining that she was going to LA to get married, but that seemed only to spur him on and he pestered her in his laddish way until he went to the bar and worked on another female. I had no time for Brand before that incident and this only confirmed what an arsehole he is.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0