 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I've always wondered what do women prefer - circumcised or not circumcised?
Does it make any difference for you?
What are the benefits and the drawbacks? (no pun intended lol) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I am circumcised myself, the good is it's much cleaner than foreskin, the bad is hard to wank than foreskin lol.
As for women, some prefer it cut and some prefer foreskins.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Cut.. it's so much nicer, cleaner and wont give you HPV.. Looks prettier to in my opinion, and let's face it, any help in the pretty stakes is a good thing    |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Jay is cut & I do prefer it I agree that it is much easier to give head & also if it's a stranger you can see more a less straight away if the cock is clean or not without having to have a bit of a fiddle first |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I prefer uncut... Much better in my eyes.. and I dont think once hard looks much different.
I dont get the cleaner comments.. as I wouldnt play with someone who wasnt clean anyway.
cali |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I wouldn't play with anyone dirty either but........ Someone can appear clean smell all lovely & shower fresh but if they haven't pulled back their foreskin & washed under it properly then yuk! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
i prefer circumcised but i dont mind un cut so long as they dont have loads of forskin, ive met some guys and they have that much is makes me gag when im sucking them as i just feels horrible in my mouth, but if they only have a little that pulls back when they're hard thats fine |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I have never had anyone that the foreskin has been pulled back and it be dirty....
Cali
I have  puts you right off cottage cheese!!!  "
i have too
if i meet a guy with a foreskin i always pull it back and have a look because ive met a few guys that smell down there because they haven't cleaned their cock properly
i dont think cut is cleaner than uncut, if your clean your clean no matter which way but i do think some guys who are uncut dont wash themselves properly down there |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"some answers about being more "clean".. that's like saying a woman without lips would be more "clean" too. Total nonsense."
no i agree if a guy had a foreskin thats dirty thats down to him not the foreskin, it is totally possible to have a wash and clean yourself just some guys dont pull it back and clean behind and thats down to the individual same as some women with lips are clean and some...well some just arnt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Funny this topic came up on another site recently. A guy in the US said he hooked up with a girl he'd be flirting with for months. She got back to his place and after he'd undressed she took one look at his manhood and said, "Oh yuck. I'd never have sex with an uncut guy."
I was even more shocked to discover that being cut is more the norm over there than uncut. I always presumed it was a religious thing but far from it.
Apparently, and I've not checked up on this, the very same guy who gave us Kellogg's corn flakes and the like, went on a big moral crusade back in his day. He was quite a big celebrity back then and basically said, "Wanking is a filthy habit. You need to get your little boy's manhood cut. Not only will this make it harder for him to wank but the pain of the circumcision will always instil fear in him whenever he goes to stick his hands down his trousers." (I may have edited his actual words somewhat)
And so begun a trend over there which is still going strong.
Personally I think it's barbaric and medieval to go chopping up our bodies based on flimsy evidence when a good regular wash will do the job. I mean hell, if I didn't wash my feet then in between my toes could get dirty, so should I just cut my toes off so I don't have an "in between" any more? Crazy!
Besides, evolution made us this way, so I'll happily stick with millions of years of evolution over some crazy cereal maker's gossip from 100 years ago.
Rant over! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Funny this topic came up on another site recently. A guy in the US said he hooked up with a girl he'd be flirting with for months. She got back to his place and after he'd undressed she took one look at his manhood and said, "Oh yuck. I'd never have sex with an uncut guy."
I was even more shocked to discover that being cut is more the norm over there than uncut. I always presumed it was a religious thing but far from it.
Apparently, and I've not checked up on this, the very same guy who gave us Kellogg's corn flakes and the like, went on a big moral crusade back in his day. He was quite a big celebrity back then and basically said, "Wanking is a filthy habit. You need to get your little boy's manhood cut. Not only will this make it harder for him to wank but the pain of the circumcision will always instil fear in him whenever he goes to stick his hands down his trousers." (I may have edited his actual words somewhat)
And so begun a trend over there which is still going strong.
Personally I think it's barbaric and medieval to go chopping up our bodies based on flimsy evidence when a good regular wash will do the job. I mean hell, if I didn't wash my feet then in between my toes could get dirty, so should I just cut my toes off so I don't have an "in between" any more? Crazy!
Besides, evolution made us this way, so I'll happily stick with millions of years of evolution over some crazy cereal maker's gossip from 100 years ago.
Rant over!"
feel better now? lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
J prefers un cut the main reasons being that she likes the look of a hard un cut cock with the foreskin partly pulled back on the head of the cock witha little pre cum on the end but also because she finds it difficult to wank a guy without a foreskin unless uses lube....no probs with her mouth though! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I prefer uncut... Much better in my eyes.. and I dont think once hard looks much different.
I dont get the cleaner comments.. as I wouldnt play with someone who wasnt clean anyway.
cali "
hav 2 agree wit Cali on this 1... I do prefer uncut but at same time I wudnt say no
2 cut if they tick all my other boxes!!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *evilwolfCouple
over a year ago
Leicestershire |
Mine's staying on - he likes to go burrowing when he's pot-holing
Oh and as for not washing it properly. Have been doing that for years. It gets kind of a ritualistic to flare out and wash it well - specially in the hot weather. Blue fluff (why's it always blue?) in the belly button is more of a problem pmsl
Wolf
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Luke is cut, so yes i prefer cut to uncut! As for finding it more difficult to give him a wank, i don't seem to have any problem! Its easy to wank and to suck! And my personal opinion is cut cocks look more pleasing the eye, well my eye anyway, |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
Cut isn't for me. I love foreskin to play with, a total turn on 