 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
On the basis that the chances of meeting are minimal are there any ladies or couples who would like to send me some descent pictures to wank over ?
Gents please don't reply. I'll give you a statistical response later ?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
And what does me sending you some wanking material have to do with honesty prevailing?
If you want to cum. Stick your cock in a running blender. Your cock will explode. Honestly  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
You are clearly not a domestic goddess.
Most chaps know you put your dick in a vacuum cleaner- not a food preparation device that could cause contamination of your pesto. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Okay the stats are in after a very short 24 hour response period:
Pictures received : nil
Messages to profile: nil
Profile "looked at you": 4 (of which 2 were men)
Sarcastic comments: 3
Variables: not all "looked at you" may have shown up as all the ladies and couples who looked at my profile may use the privacy option......
Conclusion: honesty doesn't pay !
If anyone feels moved to comment (any genda!), please feel free
??
(But no serious rubbish please!!!) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
“Gents please don't reply. I'll give you a statistical response later ??”
These stats I want to see. Will you be working of the manual labour scale of wrists pulls or by volume as many of us here love a heavy cummer over a wank any day |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think I actually see his point. If I'm correct what he's done is exceptionally clever albeit not scientific.
His statement was brutally honest to the point of untasteful. So it was honest beyond what it needed to be.
Had he asked for a pic and then when one was sent wanked over it. My opinion is he would have been hiding the truth. Which though not lying is dishonest.
But how many would have sent a pic?
However honestly is not a hammer. Nor is it a fine tool. It's a Swiss army knife. Used correctly it resolves. Incorrectly it cuts.
So for all the stats. Does honesty pay? Well it depends on how you use it.
Here ends my analysis. If someone was wanking over a picture I sent them. I'd be honoured. Or would I?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
