FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Pc or non pc ...rhetorical question
Pc or non pc ...rhetorical question
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...
Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...
I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...
Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...
I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...
"
ww equals wild women? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I doubt many women would bother to reply to what ever WW is what's the point. But then 95% of the time here it is guys contacting women and I doubt there are many saying hello you are not my type so wont meet you! And if they did the recipient would more than likley laugh above anything else. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"White women I assume, can't say I've seen it ever been started in a profile"
Correct ... it’s sort of implied if BBC is big black cock ... ww would be white women ...
I have seen it on profiles over the 5+ years being on and off this site ... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman.
I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options."
Lol Wonder Woman ... that’s limiting it somewhat as you say |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It is OK to have personal choice. It is not OK to question personal choice. Even if it does not include you."
Concisely put ... personal choice that then attracts abuse from others I find distressing and puts a bad taste in ones mouth. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman.
I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options."
I am Wonder woman...well in my pics anyway..  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say that WW means white woman.
I do hope it's not Wonder Woman as that is seriously restricting your options.
I am Wonder woman...well in my pics anyway.. "
Well yes but your also a Nun and a Policewoman ... multiple personalities!!? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...
Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...
I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...
"
Try BBW op, it's a more accepted term than Wide Women  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...
Yet if a man states WW only a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...
I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...
Try BBW op, it's a more accepted term than Wide Women "
Poster wrong term your getting confused lol ww is white women |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
No abuse is acceptable and I don't think I've seen it in the forum in my 10 years here of this reported nature. It ought to be patently clear that tastes and choice are paramount and if someone states their own, it's a healthy aspect of this lifestyle. What amazes me is when someone totally believes they will be wanted by someone because they are What they are looking for', height, interests, age etc, as a fab single man Mk 1.0, when the users want a less basic version that understands and appreciates them as an individual with experience who knows their own tastes. 'I ticked all her boxes'  . Except she found insufficient attraction and compatibility. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ensualMan
over a year ago
Sutton |
People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians".
Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men.
But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians".
Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men.
But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture. "
Please don’t turn this into a racism rant... couldn’t be further from the truth.
I focused on one specific and didn’t mention blacks or Asians because it wasn’t relevant to my post, And If you knew the rules of the forum you’d know you cannot name and shame users or account holders names in threads it’s against the policy.
Additionally if you read other posts, I updated with further more clarifying comments ... it also had nothing to do with exclusion or inclusion.
You are of course entitled to your opinion but I can assure you it has nothing to do with racism... the thread was whether it was pc or not (rhetorical because any abuse is not ok ) and why it’s ok for one acronym but not the other ... please be mindful of calling people racists in a post that is not ok not cool and making a very dangerous assumption ....
please don’t project your personal feelings onto others making them appear the bad guy... you have no basis to make a call of racism about me or based on the very specific topic ( you don’t know if I myself am white, mixed race, coloured, Hispanic, Asian or even identify as black etc ) ... that is all I will say on that.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians".
Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men.
But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture.
Please don’t turn this into a racism rant... couldn’t be further from the truth.
I focused on one specific and didn’t mention blacks or Asians because it wasn’t relevant to my post, And If you knew the rules of the forum you’d know you cannot name and shame users or account holders names in threads it’s against the policy.
Additionally if you read other posts, I updated with further more clarifying comments ... it also had nothing to do with exclusion or inclusion.
You are of course entitled to your opinion but I can assure you it has nothing to do with racism... the thread was whether it was pc or not (rhetorical because any abuse is not ok ) and why it’s ok for one acronym but not the other ... please be mindful of calling people racists in a post that is not ok not cool and making a very dangerous assumption ....
please don’t project your personal feelings onto others making them appear the bad guy... you have no basis to make a call of racism about me or based on the very specific topic ( you don’t know if I myself am white, mixed race, coloured, Hispanic, Asian or even identify as black etc ) ... that is all I will say on that. "
Au contraire, YOU made it a racist comment by questioning why it was okay to state bbc whilst ignoring those who state no blacks or asians.
I say to you what I say to the black and asians who complain about being excluded: get over yourself. Concentrate on those interested in you and respect those people who don't want to fuck you.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
People can choose whoever they want to have sex with them irrespective of any reason given or not. Their body. Their rules. Doesn’t matter if it’s a racist sizest agest decision. It’s their body not yours. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The answer is the same as it is to most questions in life. Power.
If you have the power in a situation you can demand anything. But in these cases it's an extremely effective double whammy as they get to punch down while telling everyone it's punching up |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"People who post threads like this show their racism from the start. He objects to "BBC" (an acronym I hate) but does not mention the profiles that state " no blacks or asians".
Additionally, women that I have spoken to who do put a racial preference for black men on their profile get a load of abuse in private messages from white men.
But as someone said above certain people complain only about their exclusion and do not see the wider picture.
Please don’t turn this into a racism rant... couldn’t be further from the truth.
I focused on one specific and didn’t mention blacks or Asians because it wasn’t relevant to my post, And If you knew the rules of the forum you’d know you cannot name and shame users or account holders names in threads it’s against the policy.
Additionally if you read other posts, I updated with further more clarifying comments ... it also had nothing to do with exclusion or inclusion.
You are of course entitled to your opinion but I can assure you it has nothing to do with racism... the thread was whether it was pc or not (rhetorical because any abuse is not ok ) and why it’s ok for one acronym but not the other ... please be mindful of calling people racists in a post that is not ok not cool and making a very dangerous assumption ....
please don’t project your personal feelings onto others making them appear the bad guy... you have no basis to make a call of racism about me or based on the very specific topic ( you don’t know if I myself am white, mixed race, coloured, Hispanic, Asian or even identify as black etc ) ... that is all I will say on that.
Au contraire, YOU made it a racist comment by questioning why it was okay to state bbc whilst ignoring those who state no blacks or asians.
I say to you what I say to the black and asians who complain about being excluded: get over yourself. Concentrate on those interested in you and respect those people who don't want to fuck you.
"
I focused on one specific aspect I didn’t include the other two because that wasn’t the subject of the pc or non pc .. and it’s not about inclusion either as I’ve said. I know what I meant And it isn’t what you’ve replied with ... but thanks moving on |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ensualMan
over a year ago
Sutton |
You would say that.
There are so many issues with your response and I don't have the energy to deal with them all.
The point is that other people's sexual preferences whether same sex, or inter racial is a non issue. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You would say that.
There are so many issues with your response and I don't have the energy to deal with them all.
The point is that other people's sexual preferences whether same sex, or inter racial is a non issue."
Exactly: struggle to understand why that seems to elude some people. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"You would say that.
There are so many issues with your response and I don't have the energy to deal with them all.
The point is that other people's sexual preferences whether same sex, or inter racial is a non issue."
Original post ;
Why is it ok for Women here to state BBC only ...
Yet if a man states WW only, a fair share of the women take exception and send the chap abuse...
I’m am sure on both counts men send women abuse for the bbc statement as women send men abuse for the WW statement ... It’s not acceptable on either count imo ...
To recap there is no racism in that post... it’s very specific about two acronyms... it’s not about inclusiveness... the rhetorical part is it’s not ok for anyone to send abuse for their preference...
It’s actually quite funny how you’ve read into a statement and seen racism... that speaks volumes about you and your projecting your perception onto this topic ... I say again it is not racist. You also have failed to answer your prev posting which is clear you don’t understand you can not name and shame ...
I certainly won’t be devoting anymore time to explain myself to both of you that cite it as racism...
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
Mr. 
