FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Cat amongst the pigeons
Cat amongst the pigeons
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
"So from the forums I see a lot of single males complaining about not being messaged back, or not getting meets. From our limited time on here already I’ve put it down to two things. Firstly, of the literal hundreds of messages we’ve received from single males we’d say that only 5-10% have actually read our profile. So of course you’ll not be messaged back. And secondly, probably the most important, the entitlement the majority of you seem to have. Yes this is a swinging site, but I’m not obligated to fuck you just because I’m on here. I’ve received abuse and slurs for not replying to single males, they’re then blocked. I understand you’re not all like it, and will no doubt message to say you’re not like it. But honestly some of you need to really think about how you’re acting. I know this is long winded but I’d assume we aren’t the only ones dealing with this day in day out? Daisy x " Sorry  | |||
"So from the forums I see a lot of single males complaining about not being messaged back, or not getting meets. From our limited time on here already I’ve put it down to two things. Firstly, of the literal hundreds of messages we’ve received from single males we’d say that only 5-10% have actually read our profile. So of course you’ll not be messaged back. And secondly, probably the most important, the entitlement the majority of you seem to have. Yes this is a swinging site, but I’m not obligated to fuck you just because I’m on here. I’ve received abuse and slurs for not replying to single males, they’re then blocked. I understand you’re not all like it, and will no doubt message to say you’re not like it. But honestly some of you need to really think about how you’re acting. I know this is long winded but I’d assume we aren’t the only ones dealing with this day in day out? Daisy x " Five odd years off site and some things never change. Tis life online. You either ignore it or let it bother you. I recommend the former. 
A
| |||
 | |||
| |||
"So from the forums I see a lot of single males complaining about not being messaged back, or not getting meets. From our limited time on here already I’ve put it down to two things. Firstly, of the literal hundreds of messages we’ve received from single males we’d say that only 5-10% have actually read our profile. So of course you’ll not be messaged back. And secondly, probably the most important, the entitlement the majority of you seem to have. Yes this is a swinging site, but I’m not obligated to fuck you just because I’m on here. I’ve received abuse and slurs for not replying to single males, they’re then blocked. I understand you’re not all like it, and will no doubt message to say you’re not like it. But honestly some of you need to really think about how you’re acting. I know this is long winded but I’d assume we aren’t the only ones dealing with this day in day out? Daisy x Five odd years off site and some things never change. Tis life online. You either ignore it or let it bother you. I recommend the former.
A
"Welcome back, strangers! That was a long break lol | |||
"Guys with one line on their profile who think that’s enough to attract women. " Or just saying in a message to you 'I've been told I have a nice cock' WTF? I mean really? Would they try that line out in a bar? F*cking doubt it! | |||
| |||
"Guys with one line on their profile who think that’s enough to attract women. Or just saying in a message to you 'I've been told I have a nice cock' WTF? I mean really? Would they try that line out in a bar? F*cking doubt it! " I had one message to say “ my friend has said hes fucked you before, send me some pics of you and some nudes so I can see if it’s you”  | |||
"So from the forums I see a lot of single males complaining about not being messaged back, or not getting meets. From our limited time on here already I’ve put it down to two things. Firstly, of the literal hundreds of messages we’ve received from single males we’d say that only 5-10% have actually read our profile. So of course you’ll not be messaged back. And secondly, probably the most important, the entitlement the majority of you seem to have. Yes this is a swinging site, but I’m not obligated to fuck you just because I’m on here. I’ve received abuse and slurs for not replying to single males, they’re then blocked. I understand you’re not all like it, and will no doubt message to say you’re not like it. But honestly some of you need to really think about how you’re acting. I know this is long winded but I’d assume we aren’t the only ones dealing with this day in day out? Daisy x Five odd years off site and some things never change. Tis life online. You either ignore it or let it bother you. I recommend the former.
A
Welcome back, strangers! That was a long break lol "Thanks! Got stuck in traffic on the M5 circa 2013. Fortunately had some haribos and vimto to keep us going. 
A | |||
| |||
"Guys with one line on their profile who think that’s enough to attract women. Or just saying in a message to you 'I've been told I have a nice cock' WTF? I mean really? Would they try that line out in a bar? F*cking doubt it! I had one message to say “ my friend has said hes fucked you before, send me some pics of you and some nudes so I can see if it’s you” " | |||
"Guys with one line on their profile who think that’s enough to attract women. Or just saying in a message to you 'I've been told I have a nice cock' WTF? I mean really? Would they try that line out in a bar? F*cking doubt it! I had one message to say “ my friend has said hes fucked you before, send me some pics of you and some nudes so I can see if it’s you” " haha. Appalling. | |||
"So from the forums I see a lot of single males complaining about not being messaged back, or not getting meets. From our limited time on here already I’ve put it down to two things. Firstly, of the literal hundreds of messages we’ve received from single males we’d say that only 5-10% have actually read our profile. So of course you’ll not be messaged back. And secondly, probably the most important, the entitlement the majority of you seem to have. Yes this is a swinging site, but I’m not obligated to fuck you just because I’m on here. I’ve received abuse and slurs for not replying to single males, they’re then blocked. I understand you’re not all like it, and will no doubt message to say you’re not like it. But honestly some of you need to really think about how you’re acting. I know this is long winded but I’d assume we aren’t the only ones dealing with this day in day out? Daisy x Five odd years off site and some things never change. Tis life online. You either ignore it or let it bother you. I recommend the former.
A
Welcome back, strangers! That was a long break lol
Thanks!
Got stuck in traffic on the M5 circa 2013. Fortunately had some haribos and vimto to keep us going.
A"Was it that long ago? No wonder I am bloody aging lol  | |||
"So from the forums I see a lot of single males complaining about not being messaged back, or not getting meets. From our limited time on here already I’ve put it down to two things. Firstly, of the literal hundreds of messages we’ve received from single males we’d say that only 5-10% have actually read our profile. So of course you’ll not be messaged back. And secondly, probably the most important, the entitlement the majority of you seem to have. Yes this is a swinging site, but I’m not obligated to fuck you just because I’m on here. I’ve received abuse and slurs for not replying to single males, they’re then blocked. I understand you’re not all like it, and will no doubt message to say you’re not like it. But honestly some of you need to really think about how you’re acting. I know this is long winded but I’d assume we aren’t the only ones dealing with this day in day out? Daisy x " You know how it is - the people who need to hear this advice will never read it, and if they read it they’d ignore it - if they ever understood it. Meanwhile, the people who get it don’t need to know it - it’s common sense and courtesy, after all. | |||
"Guys with one line on their profile who think that’s enough to attract women. Or just saying in a message to you 'I've been told I have a nice cock' WTF? I mean really? Would they try that line out in a bar? F*cking doubt it! I had one message to say “ my friend has said hes fucked you before, send me some pics of you and some nudes so I can see if it’s you” ". ..had a guy message to say that his mate from work is bi...so could he come round to fuck me.while his mate played with hubby.. .. | |||
| |||
| |||
"Guys with one line on their profile who think that’s enough to attract women. Or just saying in a message to you 'I've been told I have a nice cock' WTF? I mean really? Would they try that line out in a bar? F*cking doubt it! I had one message to say “ my friend has said hes fucked you before, send me some pics of you and some nudes so I can see if it’s you”
. ..had a guy message to say that his mate from work is bi...so could he come round to fuck me.while his mate played with hubby.. .." genius | |||
| |||
"To the guy who messaged me earlier saying " I want to eat and fuck your pussy " .. I reported you , then deleted you ...just sayin...." #youknowwhoyouare | |||
"Just learn to ignore them, leave the message unread as it pisses them off more "This | |||
"Out of interest, are there many men who message respectively and come across as genuine but turn out to be time wasters?" Yes, I’ve come across a few! | |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there "Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
Yeah we get meets, but for every meet I've sorted through hundreds of crap messages and dozens of abusive or sickening ones. | |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it "True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery | |||
"Oh but women have it so easy here
Yeah we get meets, but for every meet I've sorted through hundreds of crap messages and dozens of abusive or sickening ones. "Exactly, it’s not really easy to be honest but every so often you get that one message that really does make you smile | |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it
True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery"But you don’t come on here moaning about it | |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it
True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery"Everything said was qualified. Most or the majority. Not all, not always. No one is entitled to anything around here and women here have things to do (lives!) other than attending to the Fab inbox. | |||
| |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it
True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery
Everything said was qualified. Most or the majority. Not all, not always.
No one is entitled to anything around here and women here have things to do (lives!) other than attending to the Fab inbox. "I don't feel entitled in the slightest
I'm nice to everyone who messages me and never give abuse, never have
| |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it
True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery
But you don’t come on here moaning about it "That I do not | |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it
True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery
Everything said was qualified. Most or the majority. Not all, not always.
No one is entitled to anything around here and women here have things to do (lives!) other than attending to the Fab inbox.
I don't feel entitled in the slightest
I'm nice to everyone who messages me and never give abuse, never have
"Sadly there are those that do on here and they really do spoil it for guys like you. | |||
 | |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it
True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery
Everything said was qualified. Most or the majority. Not all, not always.
No one is entitled to anything around here and women here have things to do (lives!) other than attending to the Fab inbox.
I don't feel entitled in the slightest
I'm nice to everyone who messages me and never give abuse, never have
Sadly there are those that do on here and they really do spoil it for guys like you. "Personally I think photo verification should be mandatory. That could slash the photoless, textless profiles overnight, less fakes and time wasters signing up daily. Would not eradicate them entirely, but it would help | |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it
True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery
Everything said was qualified. Most or the majority. Not all, not always.
No one is entitled to anything around here and women here have things to do (lives!) other than attending to the Fab inbox.
I don't feel entitled in the slightest
I'm nice to everyone who messages me and never give abuse, never have
"But I don't know who's going to abuse me or not, so I protect myself against everyone. | |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it
True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery
Everything said was qualified. Most or the majority. Not all, not always.
No one is entitled to anything around here and women here have things to do (lives!) other than attending to the Fab inbox.
I don't feel entitled in the slightest
I'm nice to everyone who messages me and never give abuse, never have
But I don't know who's going to abuse me or not, so I protect myself against everyone. "If that works for you then that's the best option. This perhaps explains why women have blocked me after a nice message or even simply viewing their profiles? I thought it was just more whittling down the prospects, as in, block everyone you don't like the look of and then it's only the rest and new visitors that's left | |||
| |||
"Kinda tarring everyine with the same brush there
Great way to prove reading isn’t a strong point. As I clearly put that I understand you’re not all like it
True, but there are a lot of generalisations on your post. And tbh most messages I send go undread, and that's after reading profiles and composing appropriate responses with the required pics attached etc etc. Its a lottery
Everything said was qualified. Most or the majority. Not all, not always.
No one is entitled to anything around here and women here have things to do (lives!) other than attending to the Fab inbox.
I don't feel entitled in the slightest
I'm nice to everyone who messages me and never give abuse, never have
But I don't know who's going to abuse me or not, so I protect myself against everyone.
If that works for you then that's the best option.
This perhaps explains why women have blocked me after a nice message or even simply viewing their profiles?
I thought it was just more whittling down the prospects, as in, block everyone you don't like the look of and then it's only the rest and new visitors that's left "Either is plausible. Protect against abuse, stop getting messages from people you won't be interested in, oh shit I know him, etc. | |||
"I would like a the option of knowing if someone read my message 6 months down the line. When you click to send someone a message and it turns out you have sent them one before, There's quite a high chance they never read it in the first place as women get so many messages. IMO it's OK to send someone a second message if they never read the first one. Or am I wrong? Another good feature would be a button which when clicked means "thanks for the message but I'm not interested" Going off thread here somewhat " Those are good points. The menu on the top right has an option for notes. Like you could leave a note saying, messaged once - ignored. Or "smells like cat pish" avoid lol | |||
| |||
| |||
"I think a lot of this is way off thread. " Which parts? I thought it was all conducive to making improvements to the quality of communications on fab, which is the original subject? | |||
| |||
"I think a lot of this is way off thread. Which parts? I thought it was all conducive to making improvements to the quality of communications on fab, which is the original subject? " The original topic was the way mostly men write to women and couples. Honestly, the benefits of relative popularity notwithstanding, we need more space for "this is exhausting and demoralising sometimes". Men discussing among themselves how they'd like women to interact with them (appreciating that here it's been quite constructive, which it isn't always) gets done a lot. | |||
| |||
| |||
"From a purely selfish point of view, the apparent majority of monosyllabic men displaying a lack of empathy only goes to highlight my sparkling wit and charm. It does surprise me to hear of my peer's approaches to women and couples, it is frankly quite worrying. However, I guess Fab might attract some people who find social interaction difficult and therefore think that it may be easier here to get laid. Pro tip: It isn't. But it's great fun trying. Right, back to my basement. " It's hard for a sparkling with to be heard over the din of the crowd, however. | |||
| |||
"I think a lot of this is way off thread. Which parts? I thought it was all conducive to making improvements to the quality of communications on fab, which is the original subject? The original topic was the way mostly men write to women and couples. Honestly, the benefits of relative popularity notwithstanding, we need more space for "this is exhausting and demoralising sometimes". Men discussing among themselves how they'd like women to interact with them (appreciating that here it's been quite constructive, which it isn't always) gets done a lot. " Well I'm afraid I have to politely disagree, myself and the gentleman above were focussing on ways to prevent women being demoralised and exhausted by implementing vetting procedures. It is an open forum, and a forum is a place for discussion, I believe we are within the rules here 
Feel free to disagree, read, not read, delete or block as applicable | |||
| |||
"Guys with one line on their profile who think that’s enough to attract women. Or just saying in a message to you 'I've been told I have a nice cock' WTF? I mean really? Would they try that line out in a bar? F*cking doubt it! I had one message to say “ my friend has said hes fucked you before, send me some pics of you and some nudes so I can see if it’s you” "That is totally wrong. How dare another guy say you have fucked. What happened to being discreet.... just block them Hun don't let them get to you, their loss not yours | |||
| |||
"I think a lot of this is way off thread. Which parts? I thought it was all conducive to making improvements to the quality of communications on fab, which is the original subject? The original topic was the way mostly men write to women and couples. Honestly, the benefits of relative popularity notwithstanding, we need more space for "this is exhausting and demoralising sometimes". Men discussing among themselves how they'd like women to interact with them (appreciating that here it's been quite constructive, which it isn't always) gets done a lot. Well I'm afraid I have to politely disagree, myself and the gentleman above were focussing on ways to prevent women being demoralised and exhausted by implementing vetting procedures. It is an open forum, and a forum is a place for discussion, I believe we are within the rules here
Feel free to disagree, read, not read, delete or block as applicable "A no thank you button would get the same issue. Some people do mind being messaged again, some don't, but you can't tell which. For repeat messages, try a different approach and think about being considerably slower than what might be considered pestering (days minimum). Private notes are in site supporter features if you have them. Ultimately what needs to change is the lazy, obnoxious, rude/ threatening/ abusive attitude many guys here have. (and occasionally others) Every real profile represents a real person or couple, all of whom deserve respect. (although respect can unfortunately include "briefly consider but still delete message") | |||
"I think a lot of this is way off thread. Which parts? I thought it was all conducive to making improvements to the quality of communications on fab, which is the original subject? The original topic was the way mostly men write to women and couples. Honestly, the benefits of relative popularity notwithstanding, we need more space for "this is exhausting and demoralising sometimes". Men discussing among themselves how they'd like women to interact with them (appreciating that here it's been quite constructive, which it isn't always) gets done a lot. Well I'm afraid I have to politely disagree, myself and the gentleman above were focussing on ways to prevent women being demoralised and exhausted by implementing vetting procedures. It is an open forum, and a forum is a place for discussion, I believe we are within the rules here
Feel free to disagree, read, not read, delete or block as applicable
A no thank you button would get the same issue.
Some people do mind being messaged again, some don't, but you can't tell which. For repeat messages, try a different approach and think about being considerably slower than what might be considered pestering (days minimum).
Private notes are in site supporter features if you have them.
Ultimately what needs to change is the lazy, obnoxious, rude/ threatening/ abusive attitude many guys here have. (and occasionally others) Every real profile represents a real person or couple, all of whom deserve respect. (although respect can unfortunately include "briefly consider but still delete message") "When dealing with people I think unfortunately those issues will persist. They are people after all  | |||
| |||
"I think a lot of this is way off thread. Which parts? I thought it was all conducive to making improvements to the quality of communications on fab, which is the original subject? The original topic was the way mostly men write to women and couples. Honestly, the benefits of relative popularity notwithstanding, we need more space for "this is exhausting and demoralising sometimes". Men discussing among themselves how they'd like women to interact with them (appreciating that here it's been quite constructive, which it isn't always) gets done a lot. Well I'm afraid I have to politely disagree, myself and the gentleman above were focussing on ways to prevent women being demoralised and exhausted by implementing vetting procedures. It is an open forum, and a forum is a place for discussion, I believe we are within the rules here
Feel free to disagree, read, not read, delete or block as applicable
A no thank you button would get the same issue.
Some people do mind being messaged again, some don't, but you can't tell which. For repeat messages, try a different approach and think about being considerably slower than what might be considered pestering (days minimum).
Private notes are in site supporter features if you have them.
Ultimately what needs to change is the lazy, obnoxious, rude/ threatening/ abusive attitude many guys here have. (and occasionally others) Every real profile represents a real person or couple, all of whom deserve respect. (although respect can unfortunately include "briefly consider but still delete message")
When dealing with people I think unfortunately those issues will persist. They are people after all "Sure. But, it sucks, and it's important for those subject to the abuse to discuss it. The whole, it's universal not just something I've done wrong. I have developed an immunity to it, but I often avoid my inbox because ugh I do not want to hear it. | |||
 | |||
| |||
"I wonder how many times someone writes a fancy a fuck message before realising it doesn't work. And imagine the feeling he must get if on his 1000th message he gets a 'yes come round now' reply. Lottery winner "It’s even more direct on Fabguys but still it’s a case of Meet now... 2am Meet even though I’m a hundred miles away Do something that your profile suggests your not into Time wasters Picture hunters etc | |||
"I wonder how many times someone writes a fancy a fuck message before realising it doesn't work. And imagine the feeling he must get if on his 1000th message he gets a 'yes come round now' reply. Lottery winner "I've heard that some guys use the scattergun approach. It's worth sending 1000 messages and pissing off 999 women if one says yes. Problem is when hundreds of men do this. | |||
"I wonder how many times someone writes a fancy a fuck message before realising it doesn't work. And imagine the feeling he must get if on his 1000th message he gets a 'yes come round now' reply. Lottery winner
It’s even more direct on Fabguys but still it’s a case of
Meet now... 2am
Meet even though I’m a hundred miles away
Do something that your profile suggests your not into
Time wasters
Picture hunters etc
"Lol I get all of that. | |||
"I think a lot of this is way off thread. Which parts? I thought it was all conducive to making improvements to the quality of communications on fab, which is the original subject? The original topic was the way mostly men write to women and couples. Honestly, the benefits of relative popularity notwithstanding, we need more space for "this is exhausting and demoralising sometimes". Men discussing among themselves how they'd like women to interact with them (appreciating that here it's been quite constructive, which it isn't always) gets done a lot. Well I'm afraid I have to politely disagree, myself and the gentleman above were focussing on ways to prevent women being demoralised and exhausted by implementing vetting procedures. It is an open forum, and a forum is a place for discussion, I believe we are within the rules here
Feel free to disagree, read, not read, delete or block as applicable
A no thank you button would get the same issue.
Some people do mind being messaged again, some don't, but you can't tell which. For repeat messages, try a different approach and think about being considerably slower than what might be considered pestering (days minimum).
Private notes are in site supporter features if you have them.
Ultimately what needs to change is the lazy, obnoxious, rude/ threatening/ abusive attitude many guys here have. (and occasionally others) Every real profile represents a real person or couple, all of whom deserve respect. (although respect can unfortunately include "briefly consider but still delete message")
When dealing with people I think unfortunately those issues will persist. They are people after all
Sure. But, it sucks, and it's important for those subject to the abuse to discuss it. The whole, it's universal not just something I've done wrong.
I have developed an immunity to it, but I often avoid my inbox because ugh I do not want to hear it. "Abusive, abrupt and shite messages and a sense of entitlement isn't limited to single males though. It's just don to numbers that it appears more prevalent from them. Having spent many a year as a single male as well as a couple I've seen more than my fair share of 'inappropriate behaviour' from women and couples towards single men. There's often a sense of a pecking order with guys firmly at the bottom. Couples and single women can expect to be chased, treated as the objects of desire and generally allowed to sit and wait for messages to come to them, rather than any need to go looking themselves. Those that suffer the most from 'abuse' and unwanted attention would probably benefit from ignoring all incoming messages and starting to send initial enquiries out themselves, rather than expect others to do the groundwork. You get out what you put in. Not happy with what's hitting your inbox? Start looking for what you want instead of waiting for it to come looking for you. Or - as I always used to say - try clubs. A | |||
"I wonder how many times someone writes a fancy a fuck message before realising it doesn't work. And imagine the feeling he must get if on his 1000th message he gets a 'yes come round now' reply. Lottery winner
I've heard that some guys use the scattergun approach. It's worth sending 1000 messages and pissing off 999 women if one says yes.
Problem is when hundreds of men do this. "Personally I’m playing hard to get and it turns out I’m really good at it so it seems. | |||
| |||
| |||
"I'd like the option of being able to filter people with less than a certain amount of veris. But that would push the newbies out of the options. Have it so you can choose the minimum amount of veris over a chosen time period. I think the vast majority of people with one verification are fakers. 5 verifications over 8 months is about optimum in my opinion " Ladies and gentlemen... the elitists, cliques and in-crowd have arrived. Trouble is suddenly ppl would be suddenly over your ideal and no one new would get to meet. It’s a caste system in disguise. | |||
"I'd like the option of being able to filter people with less than a certain amount of veris. But that would push the newbies out of the options. Have it so you can choose the minimum amount of veris over a chosen time period. I think the vast majority of people with one verification are fakers. 5 verifications over 8 months is about optimum in my opinion Ladies and gentlemen... the elitists, cliques and in-crowd have arrived. Trouble is suddenly ppl would be suddenly over your ideal and no one new would get to meet. It’s a caste system in disguise. " A bit extreme to call it a caste system. It just gives people more options on their preferences. My last sentence was a joke which could well have been a shit joke knowing my history of joking | |||
| |||
"Out of interest, are there many men who message respectively and come across as genuine but turn out to be time wasters?" In short yes. | |||
"Those that suffer the most from 'abuse' and unwanted attention would probably benefit from ignoring all incoming messages and starting to send initial enquiries out themselves, rather than expect others to do the groundwork. You get out what you put in. Not happy with what's hitting your inbox? Start looking for what you want instead of waiting for it to come looking for you." This is what works best for me! I keep my profile hidden until I come across someone that takes my fancy, then I'll send them a message and unhide myself until they've taken a look. I've found that proactive messaging leads to better conversations and a much better chance of actually meeting. Even when I would respond to someone else's initial message, the majority of the time they'd go quiet when it actually came to arranging a meet. It's no fun when slogging through an inbox of dross becomes a chore, and makes me disinclined to continue using the site. | |||
"Calibre of messages for a single on here as I’ve a single profile. 1. Can I breed you 2. Are you on your period? As I’ve a period fetish 3. Use me a cum dump 4. Kik me babe 5. Can my wife watch If every single woman moaned on here as much as men the forums would be that about that. I occasionally read them out to hubby who is like do they really think your going to message back. Guys on here don’t do themselves any favours. I’ve sadly no sympathy for them. Kitty xx" But you’re not looking for single guys so presumably they’re blocked anyway! | |||
"Guys with one line on their profile who think that’s enough to attract women. Or just saying in a message to you 'I've been told I have a nice cock' WTF? I mean really? Would they try that line out in a bar? F*cking doubt it! I had one message to say “ my friend has said hes fucked you before, send me some pics of you and some nudes so I can see if it’s you”
That is totally wrong. How dare another guy say you have fucked. What happened to being discreet.... just block them Hun don't let them get to you, their loss not yours"I knew it was BS as I’ve slept with three guys and I’m now married to the third. It was just a bizzare ploy to get me to send him a message | |||
| |||
"So from the forums I see a lot of single males complaining about not being messaged back, or not getting meets. From our limited time on here already I’ve put it down to two things. Firstly, of the literal hundreds of messages we’ve received from single males we’d say that only 5-10% have actually read our profile. So of course you’ll not be messaged back. And secondly, probably the most important, the entitlement the majority of you seem to have. Yes this is a swinging site, but I’m not obligated to fuck you just because I’m on here. I’ve received abuse and slurs for not replying to single males, they’re then blocked. I understand you’re not all like it, and will no doubt message to say you’re not like it. But honestly some of you need to really think about how you’re acting. I know this is long winded but I’d assume we aren’t the only ones dealing with this day in day out? Daisy x " Well said !! I must block 5- 10 people a day, who haven't read my profile or aren't what Iam seeking. It's not too be rude, it's to save time and hopefully ( although I doubt it ) they might one day learn | |||
| |||
| |||
"I had a guy message asking 'does your cunt still bleed' I give up, I really do "And who said romance is dead? 80% of men on here don’t pull in the “vanilla” world why do they assume they can in this world | |||
"I had a guy message asking 'does your cunt still bleed' I give up, I really do "I used to get messages telling me that my dresses were short and they were going to bend me over and fuck me in a pub. These days now it's clear that they're not short, I'm usually told that they're going to destroy my dresses to get at me. | |||
"So from the forums I see a lot of single males complaining about not being messaged back, or not getting meets. From our limited time on here already I’ve put it down to two things. Firstly, of the literal hundreds of messages we’ve received from single males we’d say that only 5-10% have actually read our profile. So of course you’ll not be messaged back. And secondly, probably the most important, the entitlement the majority of you seem to have. Yes this is a swinging site, but I’m not obligated to fuck you just because I’m on here. I’ve received abuse and slurs for not replying to single males, they’re then blocked. I understand you’re not all like it, and will no doubt message to say you’re not like it. But honestly some of you need to really think about how you’re acting. I know this is long winded but I’d assume we aren’t the only ones dealing with this day in day out? Daisy x Great photo Daisy, can I fuck your cunt with a cucumber as I wank with a pair of your worn lacy knickers " Pmsl | |||
"So from the forums I see a lot of single males complaining about not being messaged back, or not getting meets. From our limited time on here already I’ve put it down to two things. Firstly, of the literal hundreds of messages we’ve received from single males we’d say that only 5-10% have actually read our profile. So of course you’ll not be messaged back. And secondly, probably the most important, the entitlement the majority of you seem to have. Yes this is a swinging site, but I’m not obligated to fuck you just because I’m on here. I’ve received abuse and slurs for not replying to single males, they’re then blocked. I understand you’re not all like it, and will no doubt message to say you’re not like it. But honestly some of you need to really think about how you’re acting. I know this is long winded but I’d assume we aren’t the only ones dealing with this day in day out? Daisy x " Great photo daisy, can I fuck your cunt with a cucumber as I wank my cock with a pair of your worn lacy knickers pmsl | |||
| |||
" Yes, I’ve come across a few!" I bet they enjoyed that! | |||
| |||
