FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Most common meet type from Fab

Most common meet type from Fab

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

What does everyone reckon is the most common meet scenario within the Fab community?

MF

MFM

MFMF

FF

MM

Or additions to these

We would guess that it might be MFM if we took a guess from browsing veris (it’s a lot more common than we thought before joining Fab) but just curious if anyone else had an idea?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If talking about private meets and not at a club etc you'd think it would be mfm or mm given the statistical volume of m's.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"If talking about private meets and not at a club etc you'd think it would be mfm or mm given the statistical volume of m's."

Does that mean, in your experience, that in clubs then MFMF is more common than MFM ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If talking about private meets and not at a club etc you'd think it would be mfm or mm given the statistical volume of m's.

Does that mean, in your experience, that in clubs then MFMF is more common than MFM ? "

Clubs are notorious for being very tilted in favour of MFMF meets over MFM ones. If a couple went to a club with the intention of meeting single men there's more chance of them ending up doing a MMMMF or something like that than just a straight up MFM.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If talking about private meets and not at a club etc you'd think it would be mfm or mm given the statistical volume of m's.

Does that mean, in your experience, that in clubs then MFMF is more common than MFM ? "

It probably is as single guys have relatively limited access to clubs.

But, actually meant in terms of purer parameters for the question.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"If talking about private meets and not at a club etc you'd think it would be mfm or mm given the statistical volume of m's.

Does that mean, in your experience, that in clubs then MFMF is more common than MFM ?

It probably is as single guys have relatively limited access to clubs.

But, actually meant in terms of purer parameters for the question."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

In my experience single guys can often meet without any veris being exchanged. I've got to the point now where I turn them down if offered. I think couples are more needy of veris, so tend to seek them out. In short, there may be a whole bunch of MF's going on that the system isn't picking up on.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"In my experience single guys can often meet without any veris being exchanged. I've got to the point now where I turn them down if offered. I think couples are more needy of veris, so tend to seek them out. In short, there may be a whole bunch of MF's going on that the system isn't picking up on. "

Surely you mean MFM's from what you've said?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"In my experience single guys can often meet without any veris being exchanged. I've got to the point now where I turn them down if offered. I think couples are more needy of veris, so tend to seek them out. In short, there may be a whole bunch of MF's going on that the system isn't picking up on.

Surely you mean MFM's from what you've said?"

I've met several women during my time on here and not got a single veri from any of them. Not only do I not need a veri to feel good about the connection we had, but I don't need them to advertise my wares to other women, and I certainly don't need to put another notch on my bedpost.

Couples don't really see veris in this way. So for them the more veris the better. Hence why they collect them

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"In my experience single guys can often meet without any veris being exchanged. I've got to the point now where I turn them down if offered. I think couples are more needy of veris, so tend to seek them out. In short, there may be a whole bunch of MF's going on that the system isn't picking up on.

Surely you mean MFM's from what you've said?

I've met several women during my time on here and not got a single veri from any of them. Not only do I not need a veri to feel good about the connection we had, but I don't need them to advertise my wares to other women, and I certainly don't need to put another notch on my bedpost.

Couples don't really see veris in this way. So for them the more veris the better. Hence why they collect them "

Ah, gotcha. I misunderstood your previous post to mean mf/mf to mfm.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If I had to guess I’d say MFMF (couples) is the most common, followed by MMF

Though in my personal experience it’s rare enough to get any meet at all!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It’ll mostly be MF meetings cos that’s the simplest to organise

Once you add a 3rd or 4th person into the equation then that adds to the complexity.

MF he fancies her she fancies him they shag

Mfm he fancies her she fancies him but she doesn’t fancy his mate

Or his mate doesn’t fancier her

Every extra person adds extra hoops to jump though. So basic statistics suggests the simplest form of meeting will be most numerous

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Im fairly new and would settle for any type of meet lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *kyblue1878Couple  over a year ago

Southport

One would expect MFMF to be the most common meet, followed by MFM. By design this is what swinging is. Not ignoring MFF but this is much rarer than MFM. A single meeting another single is not swinging.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

All our meets have been mmfm

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Iv only done 1 on one mainly tried a couple group things but wasnt for me a case of run before i can walk

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’ll mostly be MF meetings cos that’s the simplest to organise

Once you add a 3rd or 4th person into the equation then that adds to the complexity.

MF he fancies her she fancies him they shag

Mfm he fancies her she fancies him but she doesn’t fancy his mate

Or his mate doesn’t fancier her

Every extra person adds extra hoops to jump though. So basic statistics suggests the simplest form of meeting will be most numerous "

No way is it statistically possible for the single f to be involved in the most common type of meet. I'd be surprised if that demographic was even involved in any of the 5 most common meet types on here.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’ll mostly be MF meetings cos that’s the simplest to organise

Once you add a 3rd or 4th person into the equation then that adds to the complexity.

MF he fancies her she fancies him they shag

Mfm he fancies her she fancies him but she doesn’t fancy his mate

Or his mate doesn’t fancier her

Every extra person adds extra hoops to jump though. So basic statistics suggests the simplest form of meeting will be most numerous

No way is it statistically possible for the single f to be involved in the most common type of meet. I'd be surprised if that demographic was even involved in any of the 5 most common meet types on here."

I’ve organised MFMF ive organised mmf I’ve organised mff I’ve organised mf

Mf is by far the easiest the amount of messing you have to do to find some your other half fancies too.

Let alone finding people that fancy your other half or fancy you.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’ll mostly be MF meetings cos that’s the simplest to organise

Once you add a 3rd or 4th person into the equation then that adds to the complexity.

MF he fancies her she fancies him they shag

Mfm he fancies her she fancies him but she doesn’t fancy his mate

Or his mate doesn’t fancier her

Every extra person adds extra hoops to jump though. So basic statistics suggests the simplest form of meeting will be most numerous

No way is it statistically possible for the single f to be involved in the most common type of meet. I'd be surprised if that demographic was even involved in any of the 5 most common meet types on here."

I'd suggest every time a single female wants a meet she can pretty much have one, even at the drop of a hat. Next come couples, who may need to plan for a meet but, if they're sexy, they can pretty much advertise and make it happen. The single male is definitely the one without any power at all on this site. My own presence here is entirely passive. However those single women meet someone. So there are probably some lucky guys out there racking up their meets.

So yes, all in all, I'd say silent MF's are probably the biggest meets, followed by MMF's then MFMF's

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’ll mostly be MF meetings cos that’s the simplest to organise

Once you add a 3rd or 4th person into the equation then that adds to the complexity.

MF he fancies her she fancies him they shag

Mfm he fancies her she fancies him but she doesn’t fancy his mate

Or his mate doesn’t fancier her

Every extra person adds extra hoops to jump though. So basic statistics suggests the simplest form of meeting will be most numerous

No way is it statistically possible for the single f to be involved in the most common type of meet. I'd be surprised if that demographic was even involved in any of the 5 most common meet types on here.

I’ve organised MFMF ive organised mmf I’ve organised mff I’ve organised mf

Mf is by far the easiest the amount of messing you have to do to find some your other half fancies too.

Let alone finding people that fancy your other half or fancy you.

"

Your personal experience has no relation to the most common meet types on here!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I have met a lot of people mostly single women.

Those single women mostly meet single men.

I’ve played as a single and as part of a couple and I get way more action as a single cos it’s simpler.

So my experience doesn’t dictate the experience of others on the site but it does serve as a barometer for what is happening for others

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’ll mostly be MF meetings cos that’s the simplest to organise

Once you add a 3rd or 4th person into the equation then that adds to the complexity.

MF he fancies her she fancies him they shag

Mfm he fancies her she fancies him but she doesn’t fancy his mate

Or his mate doesn’t fancier her

Every extra person adds extra hoops to jump though. So basic statistics suggests the simplest form of meeting will be most numerous

No way is it statistically possible for the single f to be involved in the most common type of meet. I'd be surprised if that demographic was even involved in any of the 5 most common meet types on here.

I'd suggest every time a single female wants a meet she can pretty much have one, even at the drop of a hat. Next come couples, who may need to plan for a meet but, if they're sexy, they can pretty much advertise and make it happen. The single male is definitely the one without any power at all on this site. My own presence here is entirely passive. However those single women meet someone. So there are probably some lucky guys out there racking up their meets.

So yes, all in all, I'd say silent MF's are probably the biggest meets, followed by MMF's then MFMF's "

Following your logic it is no wonder the fems don't want veris, they must be having 50 meets a week with guys!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I have met a lot of people mostly single women.

Those single women mostly meet single men.

I’ve played as a single and as part of a couple and I get way more action as a single cos it’s simpler.

So my experience doesn’t dictate the experience of others on the site but it does serve as a barometer for what is happening for others"

When I was on here with my ex we racked up loads of socials and meets. But that's because she was slim and sexy. As a guy I've had to be totally passive. But even then I've found it pretty easy to meet. So I don't know what that says haha

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uck-RogersMan  over a year ago

Tarka trail

MM MM MM

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

There is another thread about gangbangs and group fun and a lot of people on there are complaining about how difficult it is to organise them. It kinda reinforces my point

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Fffm

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I have met a lot of people mostly single women.

Those single women mostly meet single men.

I’ve played as a single and as part of a couple and I get way more action as a single cos it’s simpler.

So my experience doesn’t dictate the experience of others on the site but it does serve as a barometer for what is happening for others"

Have any of these women passed comment on your tiny barometer?!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I have met a lot of people mostly single women.

Those single women mostly meet single men.

I’ve played as a single and as part of a couple and I get way more action as a single cos it’s simpler.

So my experience doesn’t dictate the experience of others on the site but it does serve as a barometer for what is happening for others

Have any of these women passed comment on your tiny barometer?!"

Yeah apparently it goes up and down depending on what the weather is

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I have met a lot of people mostly single women.

Those single women mostly meet single men.

I’ve played as a single and as part of a couple and I get way more action as a single cos it’s simpler.

So my experience doesn’t dictate the experience of others on the site but it does serve as a barometer for what is happening for others

Have any of these women passed comment on your tiny barometer?!

Yeah apparently it goes up and down depending on what the weather is"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0312

0