FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > A "No Thank You Button" would be good!
A "No Thank You Button" would be good!
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Alternatively how about one convenient button that not only tells the person you're not interested but deletes their message at the same time, thereby helping you keep on top of your inbox. We could call it something like the "delete" button  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *r.BlondeMan
over a year ago
Chester/Wirral |
"Alternatively how about one convenient button that not only tells the person you're not interested but deletes their message at the same time, thereby helping you keep on top of your inbox. We could call it something like the "delete" button "
but that could of been accidental  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Alternatively how about one convenient button that not only tells the person you're not interested but deletes their message at the same time, thereby helping you keep on top of your inbox. We could call it something like the "delete" button "
Exactly.
My view is that an automated "no thanks" button would cause even more anguish and resentment. You get all excited seeing you've got a reply and then discover its actually yet another. "sod off".
I still can't fathom why people want to be explicitly told someone doesn't fancy them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *r.BlondeMan
over a year ago
Chester/Wirral |
"Alternatively how about one convenient button that not only tells the person you're not interested but deletes their message at the same time, thereby helping you keep on top of your inbox. We could call it something like the "delete" button
Exactly.
My view is that an automated "no thanks" button would cause even more anguish and resentment. You get all excited seeing you've got a reply and then discover its actually yet another. "sod off".
I still can't fathom why people want to be explicitly told someone doesn't fancy them. "
I don't get it either why do you want false hope. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Alternatively how about one convenient button that not only tells the person you're not interested but deletes their message at the same time, thereby helping you keep on top of your inbox. We could call it something like the "delete" button
Exactly.
My view is that an automated "no thanks" button would cause even more anguish and resentment. You get all excited seeing you've got a reply and then discover its actually yet another. "sod off".
I still can't fathom why people want to be explicitly told someone doesn't fancy them. "
Between the vile "no thanks. we don't meet ugly people", the well meaning but botched "no thanks. I know we're no oil painting either. but we don't like the look of you", and a simple delete... I'll take the delete every time.
It's just a shame that it is literally every time |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Alternatively how about one convenient button that not only tells the person you're not interested but deletes their message at the same time, thereby helping you keep on top of your inbox. We could call it something like the "delete" button
Exactly.
My view is that an automated "no thanks" button would cause even more anguish and resentment. You get all excited seeing you've got a reply and then discover its actually yet another. "sod off".
I still can't fathom why people want to be explicitly told someone doesn't fancy them.
Between the vile "no thanks. we don't meet ugly people", the well meaning but botched "no thanks. I know we're no oil painting either. but we don't like the look of you", and a simple delete... I'll take the delete every time.
It's just a shame that it is literally every time "
When at least one of you has a vagina, you are clearly royalty on here and you expect penis holders to bow down at your command. Thus, when of such people messages you and says "no", it's as if everything you ever thought about the world had been proved wrong.
In order to avoid such trauma no reply is always preferable. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"In stead of ignoring messages or marking them as unread would you use a "no thank you" button?"
Yes we would and an excellent idea! But it'll be A mammoth task of getting it actually added to the site features   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"In stead of ignoring messages or marking them as unread would you use a "no thank you" button?"
I sometimes set and unset message filters. I don’t reply to say “no thanks” to the ones I’m not interested in because when I set filters again to stop unwanted messages coming through, the user I have replied to, to say “no thanks” can continue to message even when the filters have been set again because of the fact I have replied to them.
So I think this would be a great idea as long as a standard “no thanks” reply would not allow the user to then bypass message filters when I set them again
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
Whilst in principle it's a good idea - in practice it would create an alternate problem - those that moan about not getting a reply, would then moan about getting an automated one that said no thanks or worse still would follow up that automated message with either a question as to why it was no thanks, or the abuse they send now when they are turned down.
A far better feature would be that those that get butt hurt over not getting a reply simply accepted that no reply means no interest  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whilst in principle it's a good idea - in practice it would create an alternate problem - those that moan about not getting a reply, would then moan about getting an automated one that said no thanks or worse still would follow up that automated message with either a question as to why it was no thanks, or the abuse they send now when they are turned down.
A far better feature would be that those that get butt hurt over not getting a reply simply accepted that no reply means no interest "
Perhaps a simple set of options after you press the "no thanks" button...
- Too Ugly
- Too Far Away
- Too Lewd
- Too Fawning
- Too Fake
- Too Married
- You Didn't Bother To Read My Profile, So I Can't Be Bothered To Reply
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Perhaps a simple set of options after you press the "no thanks" button...
- Too Ugly
- Too Far Away
- Too Lewd
- Too Fawning
- Too Fake
- Too Married
- You Didn't Bother To Read My Profile, So I Can't Be Bothered To Reply
"
That last option might as well come automatically ticked for the majority of messages we get. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Alternatively how about one convenient button that not only tells the person you're not interested but deletes their message at the same time, thereby helping you keep on top of your inbox. We could call it something like the "delete" button
Exactly.
My view is that an automated "no thanks" button would cause even more anguish and resentment. You get all excited seeing you've got a reply and then discover its actually yet another. "sod off".
I still can't fathom why people want to be explicitly told someone doesn't fancy them. "
It's to control our behaviour. We must acknowledge their plea for sex. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
